HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 240615-U-83
RESOLUTION NO. 2406
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS EQUALING A TOTAL OF 39,200 SQ. FT,
APPLICANT: Design Analysis (Town Center Associates)
ADDRESS: 1659-A West San Carlos Street, San Jose, California 95128
SUBMITTED: May 2, 1983
LOCATION: Southwest quadrant of De Anza Boulevard and Rodrigues Avenue
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINDINGS AND SUBCONCLUSIONS:
Approval is recommended subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and
subconclusions as set forth in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting
of June 13, 1983.
CONDITIONS:
1-14. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the
special conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does
exist, the special conditions enumerated herein shall apply.
15. The approval is based upon Exhibits A, B, C and D of Application 15-U-83
as may be modified by additional conditions contained herein.
16. The approval is granted for two office buildings equaling a total of 39,200
sq. ft. The development shall not exceed a floor area ratio
of .33 for the entire 10 acre site. Uses may include general office,
corporate administrative office, proto-type research, as defined below,
and incidential and related commercial uses as approved by the Director
of Planning and Development.
Proto-type research and development activities may be conducted in con-
juction with the above mentioned office activities subject to the defin-
ition and guidelines listed below:
T)Pfinitinn
Proto-type R & D refers to research and development activities which
lead to the development of a new product or a new manufacturing and
assembly process. Products which are developed, manufactured and/or
assembled as a part of a proto-type facility are not intended to be
mass produced for sale.
Guidelines for Proto-type Research and Development
1. Control of hazardous materials: The type, use and storage of
hazardous materials for proto-type research and development or
assembly is regulated by the Uniform Building Code, the Uniform
Fire Code and any new ordinance or other regulation which controls
hazardous materials.
2. Control of physical appearance: There shall be no outward appearance
-2-
15-U-83
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2406 (continued)
that a proto-type research and development or assembly process is
in place. There will be no exterior storage, and receiving facilities
shall be limited in scale. Generally, no more than 25% of the total
space occupied by the firm will be devoted to a proto-type research
and development or assembly activity.
The Director of Planning and Development shall review each request for
proto-type research and development or assembly activities. The Director
will review each application based upon the general guidelines above and
may approve, disapprove or modify the submitted plans. The Director's
decision may be appealed to the City Council as provided in the City of
Cupertino's Procedural Ordinance.
17. Reciprocal Ingress/Egress Easement
The applicant shall record a covenant obligating existing and future property
owners to enter into reciprocal ingress/egress easements with all parcels
within the subject ten acre site. Said agreements shall be placed in
escrow and recorded simultaneously with any transfer or sale of any parcel
within the subject site. Additionally, the applicant shall record a covenant
agreeing to provide reciprocal ingress/egress easements with the adjoining
parcels located to the west at such time in the future as the City can
require the same of the adjoining property owners.
1.8. Landscaping
The applicant shall return informally to the Architectural and Site Approval
Committee with a landscaping plan encompassing widened landscape planter
areas at the entrance driveways off of Rodrigues Avenue, landscape plantings
to fill in any sparse areas or gaps in the perimeter landscaping and mature
Evergreen trees (24 inch box or greater) within existing planter islands
located on the site.
19. Architecture
The applicant shall return to the Architectural and Site Approval Committee
informally prior to release of building permits to review the architecture
materials and building form proposed on Buildings A and B. The buildings
shall encompass roof overhangs complementary to existing roofs within the
Town Center project and materials which are compatible with existing
materials.
20. Pedestrian Circulation
The applicant's landscpaing plan shall encompass pedestrian circulation
areas utilizing trellis work, landscaping and texture paving treatment
throughout the subject site. The pedestrian circulation system shall
be reviewed and approved by the Architectural and Site Approval Committee
prior to release of building permits.
21. Off -Site Improvements
The applicant shall participate in the installation of brick paving
treatment across Torre Avenue at the intersection of Torre and Rodrigues
Avenues to match the brick treatment at the City Hall/Library complex, and
-3-
15-U-83
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2406 (continued)
shall agree to share in half the cost of brick paving treatment across
Rodrigues Avenue at the intersection of Torre Avenue, to connect with
the Lincoln properties site to the north in an equitable manner. Further-
more, the applicant shall retain the existing Rodrigues driveway and agree
to move the driveway on Rodrigues Avenue to coordinate with the Wells Fargo
Bank site to the west at such time in the future as the City deems it to
be appropriate and the City can require the mutual cooperation of the ad-
joining property owner.
22. Parking
The applicant is required to provide one
of gross building area for any corporate
corporate office space or general office
parking at the ratio of one space for ev,
Commercial uses shall require parking at
City's Parking Ordinance.
23. Freestanding Signs
parking space for every 285 sq. ft.
administrative office space. Non -
uses within the site shall require
ary 230 sq. ft. of gross floor area.
the ratios as identified in the
Freestanding signs shall not be permitted for individual developments within
the ten acre project area.
24. Bicycle Parking
The applicant shall install one secured bicycle locking facility (bicycle
locker) for every 6,500 sq. ft. of the planned 39,200 sq. ft. of building
area which may be in lieu of equivalent parking spaces. The term "in lieu"
does not require that the parking spaces be eliminated.
25. Truck Movement
Truck movement including refuse pickup on the site shall be restricted in
the same manner as set forth in Section 10.48.062 of the Cupertino Municipal
Code.
26. Modification of the Approved Development Plan or a Building Permit
In the event that the applicant or subsequent property owner shall desire
to make any minor change, alteration or amendment in the approved development
plan or building permit, a written request and revised development plan or
building permit shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development.
If the Director of Planning and Development makes a finding that the changes
are minor and do not affect the general appearance of the area or the interests
of owners of property within or adjoining the development area, the Director
of Planning and Development may certify the change on the revised plan. If
such approval is withheld, the applicant may appeal to the Planning Commission.
If the changes are material, the Director of Planning and Development shall
submit the change to the Planning Commission for approval. If the change
is denied by the Planning Commission, the applicant may appeal to the City
Council as provided in Ordinance No. 652 of the City of Cupertino. If the
change is approved, an appeal may be made by an interested party. Further,
any member of the City Council may request a hearing before the City Council,
said request to be made within ten (10) days from the date of approval -
when the change has been approved by'the Planning Commission.
-4-
15-U-83
I' mining Commission Resol,ul ion No. 2405 (continued)
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th clay of June, 1983, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Blaine, Claudy, Chairman Adams
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Koenitzer
APPROVED:
_/s/ Victor J. Adams
Victor J. Adams, Chairman
Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Is/ Robert Cowan
Robert Cowan
Assistant Planning Director
-5-