HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso 216129-U-80
RESOLUTION NO. 2161
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
A USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 36,000 SQ. FT.
OFFICE BUILDING.
APPLICANT: Barry Swenson Builders
ADDRESS: 701 North First Street, #200, San Jose, California 95112
SUBMITTED: November 7, 1980
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Finch Avenue.
Approval is recommended subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and
subconclusions as set forth in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting
of December 8, 1980.
CONDITIONS:
1-14. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the
special conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does
exist, the special conditions as enumerated herein shall apply.
15. This approval is based upon Exhibits A and B of Application 29-U-80
as may be modified by additional conditions contained herein.
16. That land use intensity shall be limited to an intensity that will not
generate more than 16 one-way trips per acre during the peak hour period.
For the purpose of the 16 one-way trip Traffic Intensity Performance
Standard, the following accounting of trips is hereby incorporated into
the project approval:
Trips Allocated to the Project Area:
2.3 x 16 acres = 36.8
Trips Generated
36,000 sq. ft. x 1 trip per 1,000 sq. ft. = 36.0
surplus = .8
In the event a development does not utilize a full 16 trips per acre allotted
by the Trip End Performance Standard, the owner of record shall have the ability
to either retain, sell, or transfer trips with other property owners within the
Stevens Creek Boulevard area subject to the procedures and requirements as
listed in the Traffic Intensity Performance Standard Policy Manual as adopted by
the City Council. All sales or transfers of trips shall be filed with the
Planning Director and City Clerk. No sale or transfer shall be finally consummated
until a use permit has been approved for the property to which the trips are to be
applied. The applicant shall reccrd a covenant to describe the trip acre constraint
and the total number of trips allocated to the particular development at the time
of development approval. The covenant shall be worded in a manner to suggest that
the future purchaser of properties consult the individual use permit files to obtain
an up-to-date status report of trips allocated to each particular property.
- 2 -
29 -U -SO
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2161 (continued)
17. The applicant shall install one secured bicycle locking facility for every
6,500 sq. ft. of building area which may be in lieu of equivalent parking
spaces. The term "in lieu" does not require that the parking spaces be
eliminated.
18. Truck movements including refuse pickup on the site shall be restricted
in the same manner as set forth in Section 10.45.030 of the Cupertino
Municipal Code.
19. The applicant (or its successors in interest) shall enter into an agree-
ment to join a car pool/van pool program to be established by the City of
Cupertino. Said agreement, may at City's option, include provisions
requiring applicant (or its successors in interest) to provide, by lease
or purchase, up to one (1) 12 -passenger van for each 25,000 sq. ft. of
employee -occupied floor area. Provision of said vans is to be contingent
upon the success of the pilot program, success being defined as securing
an unpaid driver and sufficient paying passengers to pay the costs of
acquisition and operation.
20. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a
document detailing measures to be employed to mitigate adverse impacts
resulting from on -site construction activities. Said document shall include
a proposal for delivery truck routing, noise attenuation for equipment,
dust control, rodent control and hours of construction activity satisfactory
to the Director of Planning and Development. No outside heavy construction
or grading will be permitted on Saturdays or Sundays and all permitted
work shall not commence before 7:00 a.m. and shall cease at 6:00 p.m.
21. The approval is for a 36,000 sq. ft. one-story office building which may
include industrial administration offices but shall speciff:i.�-a11v preclude
manufacturing uses. All new uses or change in use which is not reflective
of the office uses shall require use permit review.
22. The applicant shall submit a cash deposit to the City, to cover the cost
of installing and modifying the sidewalk around the public street frontage
of the subject property and shall cover the costs of modification
to existing landscape areas to accommodate the walk. Additionally, the
applicant shall agree to dedicate a public service easement on the
subject property if deemed necessary at some future date.
23. The applicant shall eliminate the northerlymost driveway off Finch Avenue
and replace the pavement area with landscaping. Also, the applicant shall
modify the two ingress/egress driveways off Stevens Creek BouLevard, to
conform to the City's 32 ft. commercial curb -cut standard. The waesterlvmost
driveway enlargement shall be shifted in an easterly direction to place
the entrance as far from the intersection as possible.
24. The applicant/owner shall provide reciprocal ingress/egress easements
between Parcels A and B. Said easements shall he approved by the City,
placed in escrow, and recorded simultaneously with any transfer of ownership
at no cost to the City. Additionally, the applicant shall record a
covenant agreeing to provide reciprocal ingress/egress easements between
Parcel B as identified on Exhibit A of Application 21 -TM -80 ar.d the
property to the east, at such time in the future as the City can require
the same of the adjoining property owner.
-3-
29-U-80
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2161 (continued)
25. The applicant must demonstrate approval to connect up to the sanitary
sewer system prior to obtaining building permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 1980, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Adams, Blaine, Claudy, Chairman Koenitzer
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
APPROVED:
Is/ R. Koenitzer
R. D. Koenitzer, Chairman
Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Robert Cowan
Assistant Planning Director
- 4 -