Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Signal Interconnect Feasibility Study - JHK Associates Consultants - 1976 City - JHK Associates Consultants Q�_ t INFORMATION ONLY C*4 of Cu ,,kertiro TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council and the City ?Manager DATE: May 14, 1976 FROM: Bert J. Viskovich, Dir. of Public Works SUBJECT: JHK - Summary of Traffic Signal Interconnect Survey Attached for your information is a digest of the JHK & Associates project report on Traffic Signal System Surveys. This is the same report the staff has made reference to in the past. There are only a few preliminary reports from the research agency. The City has requested for one in an effort to assist the City in evaluating the traffic signal interconnect system presently programmed for Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard. The interconnect project has been delayed for the purpose of obtaining the above document and al€o to gain the experience of Washington, D.C. presently utilizing the latest software generation for traffic signal interconnect. BJV:s m attach. t •� - y -�°.'�� �; �'. i�a.7.�;���e��i tom/ .� 'svr✓.�at`.� �_�J �.a� �. .r DIGEST 88 - MARCH 1976 2se Digests .3"e .ss,;=_ ."9 -e-es: :)rz. ! 3:. e3r y Zf:3re^_ss =s }. Summary of Project 3- 15(3) Traffic Signal System Surveys An NCHRP staff digest of the eseential findings from the ,irst objective (survey task) of ?roject 3-1V3), "Traf- fic Signal System Surveys, " by Thomas L. Stout, JHK and Associates, A.t Zanta, -,A THE PROBLEM AND THE RESEARCH APPROACH NC?iRP Project 3-18(3) , "Cost-Effectiveness Methodology for Evaluation of Signalized Street Network Surveillance and Control System" began in May 1975, with the objectives of developing and demonstrating a practical cost-effectiveness methodology for evaluating alternative traffic signal control systems. The methodology will take into consideration all factors bearing on the choice of the best control techniques, including such factors as types of. hardware components used; extent of real-time human operator interface required or desired; degree of automatic traffic sensing employed for either on-line control or off-line system support purposes; physical and traffic flow characteristics of the street network being controlled; the technical skills and other resources of the operating agency; and any other fa-tors having an important effect on control system requirements. The first major task of the project was described as follows: to identify and define the range of traffic surveillance and control system alternatives to which the cost-effectiveness methodology is to be applied. In order to carry out the task, and to aid in determining the methodology design, the research agency developed questionnaires for circulat{on to two different groups. One questionnaire was circulated to 50 representative researchers, signal system designers, and manufacturers. The second was distributed to 199 representative public agencies at the federal, state, and local levels. Some addressees, as both researchers and System users, received both questionnaires. - 2 - The results of analyzing the survey returns are given in a preliminary report from the research agency. Because these interim findings may have immediate value to traffic engineers, this Digest has been prepared to announce their availability on a loan basis. INTERIM FINDINGS The returns from the surveys have been analyzed and compiled into a report of 105 pages, the contents of which can be only briefly abstracted here. Even- tually, the data and the conclusions drawn from the analysis will appear in the final report on the project. 1. Survey of Researchers, Designers, and Manufacturers Nineteen returns were received from these recipients, who were asked for both qualitative and quantitative answers to questions about preliminary studies; plans, specifications and estimates; construction management; and system effectiveness. The summary report contains tables and commentary on their responses. For example, Table 5 indicates that application software caused the greatest management diffi- culty for six respondents. Communications systems were identified in four replies as being difficult to control, whereas computer main frame and peripherals created no difficulties for most respondents. 2. Survey of System Users A total of 80 responses, or a 40 per cent return, was obtained for the 12-page questionnaire sent to public agencies. This survey was intended to collect system characteristics and selection criteria concerning: a) the range of alternative systems in use; b) the evaluation, design, and implementation of systems; c) the operational and maintenance aspects. The returns provided listings of the charac- teristics of 114 signal systems. These have been fully tabulated in summary charts. In all, the report contains a total of 20 tables on the results of this survey. 3. Some General Findings From Both Surveys A. There seems to be no broad consistency in the expectations of traffic engineers for traffic control systems. Thus, evaluation methodologies must be sensitive to local policies and a range in traffic control philosophies and expected system :revels of performance. B. Respondents from agencies with digital computer systems reported a greater need for engineering personnel, rated components as having lower reliability than agencies with non-digital systems, needed and used more timing plans, and felt system flexibility was more important. C. Backup capabilities of the reported systems were generally equal to or greater than the operations level of the systems replaced.. - 3 - D. Agencies having a display map reported that its greatest value was in public relations, but that its use to display system status was nearly as valuable a function. E. Researchers and designers reported that the most important aspect of an evaluation study was to establish performance criteria for the system. APRLICATICNS The two surveys were conducted to aid the project in arriving at its objec- tives by identifying the range of system design alternatives and by suggesting methods that might be suitable for evaluating them. Yet the fact that there is not now a "consistency in expectations" among users is evidence that the survey results may also be directly and immediately useful to traffic engineers faced with design choices. The summary report may be helpful, for example, as a yardstick against which to compare criteria and characteristics for proposed traffic systems. This Digeet has been prepared in order to advise possible users of such potential vaZuea. As only a Limited number of copies of the report have been prepared, hooever, it can be grade available only on a ahort term loan basis upon receipt of requests directed tc the 9Ch P Program Director. AGRMIE25* FOR TRAFFIC ENGMEERI:R; CONSULTING SERVICES CITY OF CUPERTINO TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT FEASIBILITY STUDY THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 20t1, day of September 19 76 by and between the CITY OF CUPERTINO, hereinafter called "CITY", and Jffi and Associates. here-inafter called the "CONSULTANT". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City desires a Study to determine the econc-.sic feasibility of installing a Traffic Signal Interconnect System zlong with an estimate of benefits to be derived by the City and public; and WHEREAS, such a Study requires specialized expertise in traffic signal interconnect design and operation and extensive knowledge of interconnect systems currently in operation; and WHEREAS, the City desires the services of a professional Traffic Engineer skilled in these fields; and WHEREAS, the Consultant is qualified, experienced and has facilities to provide the required professional traffic engineering services; NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant agree as follows: I. LMPLOYMENT OF CONSULTANT The City hereby agrees to engage the Consultant to perform the technical and professional services as hereinafter set forth. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. The Consultant will provide those services described in Exhibit "A" attached. - 1 - B. The. Consultant w-:11 furnish a draft final report nc later than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of execution of this agreement by the City and the Consultant. C. Thm CoamItant will review the records of the City's Traffic f_ tr to determine the extent of available information that is applicable to this Study. The City will provide all necessary additional information required. III. SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY In cooperation with the Consultant, the City will obtain or otherwise provide if requested: A. Planning &Rta, policy guidance and technical staff coordination and revierw as required for timely completion of the project. B. City crdinat:es applicable to the project. C. Other planning data, surveys, reports or documents in City tiles applicable to the conduct of the project. IV. COMPENSATION It is agreed that the total cost. to City will be Fourteen Thousand Eight H=,—;--ed Fifty Dollars ($14,850.00) , and Consultant agrees to perform the services within such cost. �'. CHANGES IN SCOPE OF PROJECT If conditions necessitate a change in the scope of work, such change shall be cause for renegotiation of the contract for that portion of thz project. Vi. RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULIANT The Consultant is retained as a professional. consultant to the City and agrees to utilize his professional skill and best efforts in the perfor-..lance of the specified serr ices. - 2 - AM VII. DELAYS In the event Consultant is delayed in the timaly prosecution of technical studies hereunder by City, its staff or employees, "oy other agencies, or is delayed by an act of God, or through no fault on the part of the Consultant; Consultant shall present to City a writter, request for an extension of time for the performance of the project. Approval of such extension of time by City shall not be unreasonably withheld and such additional time as City approves shall be added to the time for completion. VIII. CONSULTANT AS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR It is expressly agreed that in the performance of the services necessary for the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant shall be, and is, an independent contractor. The Consultant has and shall retain the right to exercise full control and supervision of t:e services, and full control giver the employment, direction, compensation, and discharge of all persons assisting him in the perfoxmanc-� of his services hereunder. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for all matters relatin6 to the payment of his employees, including compliance with social security, withholding, and all other regulations governing such matters, and shall be - -olely responsible for his own acts and those of his subordinates and employees. IY. MON-ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEXT This agreement shall not be assigned, sublet or transferred by the Consultant in whole, or in part, without the written consent of the City. Y. OWNMHIP OF DOCL'ME.ti'TS The City shall become owner of all data, reports and drawings, plans or other material collected pursuant to this agreement. 3 - %I. UnZWT OF PUHLIC OFFICIALS No member, officer or employee of City or of a local public body during his teir"re or for one year thereafter shall have an interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof. IN WITN*. s Wes'", the City, through its duly authorized representative, and the: Consultant, have affixed their hands the: day and year first above written. CITY OF CUPERT12140 A municipal corporation of the State of California BY__L (-r�i Lil Mayor By APPROV= AS TO FORM: City erk / JHR and associates Dav d H. Adams City Attorney By 4 - 'hk« 1-1 EXHIBIT A 1. I1S1TwDucT ioN This proposal describes the work necessary to complete a feasibility study for the implementation of an interconnected traffic control system in Cupertino. Initially, the system would control Stevens Creek Boulevard from Bubb Road to Tantau Avenue, and De Anna Boulevard from Homestead Road to Bollinger Road. However, consideration mutt be given to the desirability of in- creasing the number of signals under central control during the lifetime of any proposed new system. OVERVIEW There are six basic categories of analysis to be undertaken in this project, as follows : 1. What are the traffic conditions at the present time in terms of delay to motorists? 2. How much of that delay could be reduced with an :interconnected traffic control system? 3. What is the value of that reduction in delay in terms of reduced vehicle operating costs , savings in tim;--, savings in fuel consumed, and reductions in air pollu- tion? 4. Of the many types of traffic control sys'"ems available, which type would be best suited to the specific needs cf Cupertino? 5. What would be the cost of such a system? 6. How do the identifiable dollar benefits compare to the costs? The and result of the project, will be a recommendation as to whether or not an interconnected traffic control system would be feasible at this time. If a system is recommended, it will be described in sufficient detail to be a guideline for the prepara- tion of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates. Jhk 1 .2 OBJECTIVE ATM a In carryinq out this study, J X would serve as an objective outside agent of the City. JHR has no involvements or vested interests which would preclude such service, and in no instances has the firm entered into relationships with system suppliers which would introduce any potential conflict of interest. JHR does have direct experience with system implementation--but as an agent of the public and not as a supplier of hardware or soft- ware. PROPOSAL ORGA41ZATION The proposal presents JHR's approach and qualifications, as follows: Section 2. Scope of Stork Section 3. Staffing Section 4. Qualifications Section S. Time and Cost Appendix A. JHR Resumes Appendix B. Related Experience: summaries of Selected Signal System Projects w 2-1 2. SCOPE OF WORK As defined by the City, the scope of work for the proposed study can be summarized in ten steps. These steps and a brief description of the work to be performed are indicated below: 1. Determine existins travel times, intersection delals, and average number of stops at intersections on the arterial system of Stevens Crean. Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard. The purpose of this step is to describe the current traffic flow conditions for motorists on Stevens Creek and De Anna Boulevards. The data will be collected and reduced by the City. The results will be analysed and summarized by JHK. Phis would include establishing the level of service at each intersection at present and estimate the changes in level of service approximately 5 and 10 years in the future. In addition to the peak period data which exists in City files, the City will collect additional data reflecting off-peak conditions. The City would provide all field data, including traffic counts, zur`ni.rg movements, and growth projections and trends. 2. Uport experiences of other cities or counties with systems of comparable size and their benefits, if any, from interconnecting traffic signals. A brief investigation will be made of the results obtained throughout the country where systems of comparable size have been recently installed. In addition, a summary will be included of the results of the U.T.C.S. evaluations performed by JHK for the Federal Highway Administration. 2-2 3. Predict and substantiate changes in trip travel time, numbers of stops at intersections and total intersection delay that the City can reasonably 2sMect throu�h intercotnection of its traffic sig al system. An estimate will be made of the Improvement in traffic floe that would likely result from interconnection of the traffic signal system. The estimate will be based on the following factors: a The analysis of the current situation in 1. above. ® Comparable experience as noted in 2. above. • The general level of flexibility of systems which are considered to be appreprIAte for Cupertino and are to be evaluated in 7. below. In addition, a quantitative assessment of the traffic which would potentially shift, based on estimated origins and destinations as well as comparative travel times. The City would provide peak and off-peak travel time runs on both the freewa,. and the local streets. 4. Estimate changes in gasoline consumption and air pollution with and without interconnect of the system. Based on studies performed in other cities relating changes in traffic signal control with changes in air quality, a general discussion of the effect or. air quality will be presented. In particular, the type and magnitude of the potential change in various pollutants will be discussed. The estimated change in gasoline consumption will be based on the Winfrey's "Economic Analysis for Highways". The savings will be indicated in terms of gallons per year. 5. Should the City of Cupertino )roceed with the design of an interconnect system for the Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anna Boulevard arterials. The activities of 1. through 44. above will be reviewed, and a summary of the benefits of interconnection of traffic flow will be prepared. Based on experience with feasibility studies performed in other communities, a recommendation will ha made as to whether to proceed. JHK will take into account_ both the approximate cost z-3 range ,L modern traffic control systems and the benefits developed above. Only if the benefits are clearly greater than costs will a recommendation to proceed be ice_ In addition, should a system not appear feasible at this time, an assessment will be made of the anticipated growth of traffic flow as well as possible changes in traffic patterns over the next several years, to determine if it would be j•istified in the near future. 6. Evaluate alternative system concepts and select the concept that is most appropriate for Cupertino. For example, should the City pursue a desk that could be accommodated by predesigned standard interconnect 3zstems, or should the City desiAn a custom-made system designed for its particular system characteristics? There are several different system concepts available on the market. each with somewhat different functions, features and costs. In this step, an assessment will be made of the system ec:=nept which is most suited to the traffic needs of Cupertino and the staffing capacilities of the Department of Public Works. It is iypartant to select a system concept whici: provides the necessary =eexibility without imposing maintenance demands which are beyond that which can be reasonable accomplished by the Traffic Engineer. Included in the assessment of the most appropriate concept are the following items: e The existing traffic conditions identified in 1. above. • The need for additional "special event" timing. A The need for (and eesirability of) emergency vehicle preemption. • Me need for controller monitoring. ® The usefulness of data collection. 0 The usefulness of visual displays. 2-4 • Thr- usefuL%ess of a CRT with an acoustical coupler. e The space available for the master, and its location. Various other functions than appear to have potential for application in Cupertino. In addition, an assessment must be made of the ant" )ated growth of system control during the lifetime of the system. It is import that the City not purchase a system without sufficient capability for eapanaion; on the other hand, purchase of too large a system may increase the complexity and cost of the system unnecessarily. 7. Estimate and substantiate total pro sect coots for the interconnect hardware including interface units and intersection controller changes required. ..a estimate of the cost of all system components shall be prepared by JHK. The estimate shall be based on the most recent traffic control system bids and projected cost increases 1z Ons near future. The estimate prepared in this task. shall be for goneral budgeting purposes only and is not intended to replace the Engineer's Estimate which would be prepared along with Plans and Specifications. S. Estimate and substantiate annual maintenance costs. Annual costs would include both City staff maintenance and outside contract maintenance (e.g. , many computers are serviced by the manufacturer wider an annual maintenance agreement) . The estimate of City staff activities would indicate any changes from the existing operation which would be caused by the implementation of the recommended system concept. 9. Estimate demand on personnel in man hours per month to bring the system on line, and after it is operating, estimate continual demand in man hours per month to maintain the interconnect orograms. 2-5 The purpose of this step is to define the traffic engineering tasks that will have to be performed, both during the implementation period and on a continuing basis. Included will be a discussion of the computer programs available for signal timing and data analysis which would be applicable to Cupertino. The type of skill and amount of time required for implementation and recommended for a continuing update of settings will be discussed. 10. Provide a general description of the recommended system. The purpose of this step is to provide a functional description of the recommended concept as a guideline for the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates. The description should include all items of egiipmenr , the functions to be performed by the master, the functions too be performed by field equipment, and any other features or characteristics of the system which would need separate or special treatment in the Plans and Specifications.. i 3-1 3. JR$ STAFFING This section provides information regarding the staff which JRK Associates proposes to assign to the Cupertino signal system feasibility project. The backgrounds of the primary participants are highlighted below. More detailed resumes are provided in Appendix A. Res22nsible Officer It is the policy of JHR a Associates to assign the responsi- bility for each project to an officer of the firm. Mr. Barnard C. Johnson, Vice President, will assume responsibility for the successful completion of the work effort. Project Director Mr. Barry S. Marrus, Senior associate in the San Francisco Office, will serve as the Project Director fo.:- the Cuperti o sig- nal system feasibilitCy project. Mr. Marrus has been involved in a senior technical capacity in many of JHX's major signal system projects. He is currently completing signal system feasibility studies for the cities o' Scottsdale, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico. fir. Marrus also supervised the design and provided imolementatio: . assistance for the computer-controlled system recently installec in 2hoenix, Arizona. The majority of ' he analytical work on the Cupertino project will be carried out by Mr. Marrus. Traffic Engineer Mr. Marrus will be assisted by JHR traffic engineers and technicians as required. Depending upon the nature of the speci- jhk. ..� 3-2 fie task, Mr. Marrus will draw upon one or more of the following individuals from JBX°s professional staff: Donald E. Lepie Benjamin H. Goff Edward Mona, Jr. 4-1 40 QUALIFICATIONS A brochizze describing the general qualifications and exper- ience of JHK & Associates has been submitted separately. The following, more specific information relates to signal system control projects in which JKK is or has been involved. Each is significant to the Cupertino project in that overall system analy- sis and design was performed by JHK. Further, through review of detailed design proposals for the projects, JHK is knowledgeable of current and proposed industry developments. For almost a decade, JHR & Associates and its predecessor firms have been involved in designing and implementing traffic signal system projects. Exhibit 4-1 indicates the scope of acti- vities on representative projects. Selected projects are further described in Appendix B. MIDIT 4-1 REPRESENTATIVE TRAFFIC COt9i IAOL PROJECTS Covina Som or TAM soon tle9wpw � •16 «� 4a : • MOwwOp O ; or r g u e r a s, o e e• .r r .. CC0WMTM 01 RAC ep F € S .. .. ra ro wd 3✓ w0 : • im fE6HI�tY!'Sli o..' nt a a °' o' a•.� .•. � ":� A e evr .•.': a � 0' Z .Ai w 06 .Oi • v • y w g O'�. to a • ✓r .r a .. • a rt a A 4 a » �. C w .r C 1•i t l a l Espoee8r�1 t �r, u .t ie se +. m ► .► .a u a � a ae City of s+ol tore: raryla•0 ON 1200 O O 01 O O _O 0 ® O 01 0 0 0 ® O ® O ssal.sco city of riz+te.yoiis. rimaesots Esc e50 O Q © ® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 0 0 0 0 s6CJ.coo e-rtt:eta Virginia Ketropollta.� Area. Viryi•ia 420 700 ® Q _O O s 96•003 Otte.o - Corlston 6 atoll. con"a 260 SOO C 0 0 O O O O 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O 3171.0]0 C:tr of ►hn,!n1a. Arica., 260 410 0 O O O O O O O O O O O ® ® O O O s:al,cz0 Tel Aviv rttte;.olitaa %too. Israel i7S e50 O O ® 3 51,00 eito of {.re•- toaco. "rth e,eoli+ts 160 300 ® 0 0 0 0 0 O O_ O O O O O O m m 0 3210.oc] Cite cf S,iti-1h. t-arth cotollea D6o 254 0 O_ O A �' J_ ® O O 0 O O O O © @ ® :itr CC T—am, Arlr.se 130 :so O O O O 4D O 0 O O 0 O m m ® ® 0 0 s2:l.o_a o: C,:.•.a-e city, 6kl+tk4 110 no O O 3 O 0 3 $0.000 C�t� o: S�.arn+9, Ceor�to 100 120 O 0 O. O © O 0 O 0 city of Gs:rclt, rticttlyea 6S Ino 0 O Q 0 Q O 0 ® City of cri�.-�b,.c, c-oroia +' 7S O O O C O O O O m O O O O 8 u,ago Caty of ►A1nvt Creek. CalifOenla yS 61 0 0 O O Q O O 0 8 46.3:0 e1:r of st ►toe, e.luoraia u 60 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 8 33,030 11cra ® took eoop1ete4 by JIM 8 Associates, ® Task in pr097e29 ® took to be perfoiae0 by in a Associates -:&A raspensibiilty either tm04tawRIA04 at to be pactermed by local syaney ds N s • S-1 5. TIIM AND COST TIC JMK feels that up to 90 days may be required to develop a draft final report. JHK will make every attempt to minimize the amount of time needed to complece the study. PRESENTATIONS JHK suggests that two presentations be made in conjunction with this project as follows: 1. A presentation of the first phase, Tasks i through 5, will be made to the Cupertino City Council. 2. A presentation of the final report, if required, will be made to the Cupertino City Council. REPORT Three copies of -:he draft final report will be prepared for the discussion with the Director of Public 'Works and the Traffic Engineer. Within 30 days following approval of the draft by the Director of Public Works, JHK will deliver 25 copies of the final report to Cupertino. COST JHK proposes to undertake this study for L fined fee as follows: Phase i - Tasks 1 thru 5 - S8,350.00 Phase 2 - Tasks 6 thru 10 - $6,500.00 The Study may be terminated at the conclusion of Phase 1 without exceeding the Phase 1 cost. Additional meetings or presentations beyond the two described above would be billed at Cost of Service plus 150 percent. RESOLUTION NO. 4258 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AGRM1ENT WITH JHK 6 ASSOCIATES FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES - TRAFFIC SIGNAL —";M- CONNECT FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, the City is desirous of engaging the services of a traffic con- sultant to perform a feasibility study as to the merits of a traffic signal interconnect system on Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the firm of JHK b Associates is qualified and willing to perform the required study; and WHEREAS, an agreement between the City of Cupertino and JHR 4 associates , outlining the terms and conditions of the performance of the desired study , has been presented to the City Council; and said agreement having been approved by the Director of Public Works and the City attorney; NOW, THEIt.L'FORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the agreement herein referred to in behalf of the City of Cupertino. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a -regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 20th _ da; of September 1976, by the following vote : Vote Members o.c the City Council AYES: Frolicb, Jackson, Nellis, O'Keefe, Meyers NOES: `done ABSENT: :done ABSTAIN: None APPROVED: /s/ Robert W. Meyers vavor, Cicy of Cupertino ATTEST: /s/ Wm. E. Ryder City Clerk ' hk & associates i •James H. Kell, president i September 28, 1976 City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95034 Attention: Mr. Bert J. Viskovich Director of Public Works Dear Mr. Viskovich: Enclosed is the original and one copy of the executed Agreement for traffic engineering consulting services. As discussed, we will submit invoices monthly, heed on percentage completion. Any work outside the scope of the study which JHY. is directed to do (eg ad- ditional meetings or presentations) will be billed at Cost of Service plus 150 percent for staff, and at actual cost for expenses. Please return a fully executed copy. Sincerel yours, W. Weber Controller 'i 275 Fifth Street San Fi-;uu•iscn, t'alifrn'nia 94103 415 362-3141 I: atif of Cwpertwo 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino,California 95014 Telephone (408) 252-4505 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES October 4, 1976 JHK & Associates 275 Fifth Street San Francisco, Calif. 94:1.03 Attention: W.P. Weber, Controller AGRE'EIHENT FOR TRAFFI:.0 CONSULTING SERVICES Enclosed for your perusal and file is a i ui j v F•:ec•uted ropy of the Agreement between the City and JIIK & Associates for Consulting Servi.cus. ELLEN FAGNINI DEPUTY CITY CLERK EP;sc Enclosures