Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ASA-2000-22b
10300 Torre ,4verrire Cupertino, Califprnia 95014 Telephone: (408) 7~7-3308 F,4.X.• (408) 777-3333 ca~rn~uvrT~ ~,~v~r,o~~~,~T September 2f, 2(}~0 Carmen Uruena l ©~99 Merriman Road. Cupertino, CA 95014 SUBJECT: Ta-ESIGI`+1 REVTEW COMMITTEE ACTIOI'~1 LETTER -Application ~2- ASA-aa. This letter confirms the decision of the Design Review Committee, given at the meeting of September 25, 2a0~Q, giving architectural and site approval to add 56© square foot, single story addition at the back of an existing duplex, according. to Design Review Resolution No. 23. Please be aware that if this permit is not used within one year, it shall expire nn September 25, 2Q01. Also note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days of the decision. If this occurs, you will be notified of a public hearing, which will be scheduled before the Planning Commission. Sir nc~rely, ,, d -~ r Peter Gilli Assistant Planner Enclosures: Resolution. No. 23 g:plar~ninglDrc/22-ASA-4~Actiun letter Panted on Recycled Paper 22-ASA-00 CITY OF CUPERTINO 103 00 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California '95x14 RESOLUTION 23 OF' THE DESIGN REVIEW OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL TO ADD A 560 SQUARE FOOT, SINGLE STORY ADDITION AT THE SACK OF AN EXISTING DUPLEX SECTION I; PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: 22-ASA-00 Applicant: Thomas Slee and Kurt Takara (Carmea7 Uruena) Location:. 103'99 Merriman Road SEC"I"ION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval., as described in this Resolution; and W1-IEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that. the changes are beneficial and compatible with the surrounding area: 1. The proposal, at t1~e proposed location, will eat be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the Vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general. welfare, ar convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance, and tl~e General flan. a, The design will not result in abrupt changes in building scale between the subject site and neighboring properties, as the potpasal is single story and located at the rear oftl~e structure. 4. The porpasal will use materials that campiment neighboring sturestures. NOW, TIdEREFOI2.E, l~L IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of leaps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the app~licatian no. 22-ASA-00, are hereby approved, and That the subconclusians upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based. and. contained in the public hearing record concerning Application 22-ASA-00 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design. Review Committee Meeting of September 25, 2x00, and are incorporated by reference herein.. Resolution Na. 23 22-ASA-a0 jeptember 25, X000 Page 2 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXI-IIBITS Approval. is based on submitted sheet entitled "Proposed Addition Floor flan -- 10399 Merriman Road, Cupertino," dated August 28, 2000; and sheet entitled "Proposed Addition Elevation Plan 10399 Merriman Raad, Cupertino," dated August 29, 2000. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval. set Earth. herein may include certain fees, dedications,. requirements, reservation requirements, and tither exactions. Pursuant to Government Cade Section 6602.0{d) {l ), these Conditions constitute written native of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section. 66020{a}, has begun. If you fail. to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section G6020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25"' day of September, 2000, at a Regular Meeting of the 1=?esign Review Co-ntnittee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Corr, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Doyle ATTEST: fs/ Ciddy Wordell Ciddy Wordell Community Development Department Chairperson Stevens APPROVED: f s/ Jerry Stevens Jerry Stevens, Chairperson Design. Review Committee gl~>I~nnin~/dea~~n rwi~GV comn7itbeel22-t1SA-0~ resia.elcrc °;~~~ SIDE VIEW 6 G ti w V ~ 44JJ ~; /"+ ~ .; ~ ~ ~ n~Y ~ ~ - ~~ ~ pP .n aAC~rAaD ~ pu a a ~" .•v I`~ATEFt~A~~" .m ~ ~.m........M.u ~ ,~ . will match existing house: wand trim and siding, light blue paint and White trim. see photos below ~~ ~H, BAC~C VIEW .~ +- . rya ; ,tiab, _ .. .^..F.. Front of duplex Back. of duplex PROPOSEC} AC?D6TION ELEVATION PLAN - I x399 Merriman Road, Cupertino C:r,~rirv~tne {).'I~ak.~ra ~il'i)!O(1 ,~, m a ~ ' o ., ~ i __ - _ - " n a ;c - - _ ~~ 0 d _ va `U ro O ~ i d 'a ~ . .~ C L NN ` c L ..... _. ~ ~ ~ g a O O i ~ _ °,; ~u ~ LL O ~ ~~ "\~ ~ ~ y ~ f Q ' C fuI u ( w N . A _ _. d l _ _ __ ~ _ _ s F 0 I .y v a U v 0 c ! ~-.. E •~ :' E __. ~ a~ M O ` b J LL Z W A~ ~~ __.. - V