Loading...
ASA-2000-16b10300 Torre venue Cupertino, California 9S(J14 Telephone: (408) 777-33'08 F.AX.• (4fJ8) 777-3333 C0~1~MUNITY DEYELpPMENT August 25, 2000 Mr. and Mrs. Michael DeGroot 1041 ~ Meadow Place Cupertino, CA X5014 SUB.TECT: DESIGN REVIEW C©MMITTEE ACTIC)1`1 LETTER -Application 1~-ASA-00. This letter confirms the decision of the Design Review Committee, given at the meeting of August 24, 2000, giving architectural and site approval. to allow a 37 square foot addition to an existing duplex, according to Design Review Resolution No. 19. Please be aware that if this perrr~it is not used within one year, it shall expire on August 24, 2001.. Also note that an appeal of this decision can be rr~ade within 14 calendar days of the decision. If this occurs, you will be notified of a public hearing which will be scheduled before the City Council. Sincerely, Peter Gilli Assistant Planner Enclosures:. Resolution Na. 19 g:planninglDrc/ 1 G-t~.SA-©OActia~n letter P~iitteci tarp Aecycleo" Aaper CITY OF CLiPERTII+IC~ 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 950I4 RESOLIJTIQN 19 1&-ASA-00 QF Tf-IE DESIGN REVIEW COMIVIITTEE t~F TIIE CITY of CUPERTINQ APPROVING AN ARCHITECTI]RAL SITE APPROVAL OF A 37 SQUARE Fool ADDITIQN Ta AN E;~15TTNG DUPLEX. SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: 16-ASA-00 Applicant: Katja c4~ Mike DeGroat~(John Walsh) Location: 10413 Meadow Place SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application far ara Architectural anal Site Approvals as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and compatible with. the surrounding area; 1. The prapasal, at the proposed location, will. not be detrimental or injurious to property ar improvements in the vicinity, and. will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance, and the General Plan. 3. The design will not result in abrupt changesrn building scale between the subject site and neighboring properties, as the proposal is single story and located at the rear of the structure. ~. The proposal will use materials that compliment neighboring structures. N©W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application no. 1.6-ASA-00, is here by approved; and That the subconclusians upon.. which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing retard concerning Application 16-ASA-00 as set forth in the Minutes of the 1_)esign Reviewv Committee Meeting.. of August 24, 2000, and are incorporated by reference herein. Resolutzon No. 19 Page 2 16-A5A-00 Au;ust 24, 2000 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMTNISTERED BY TIdE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT, 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on submitted plan sets entitled "DeGroot Residence," dated July I8, 2444. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTI-IER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein. may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Governmezt Code Section 66Q24(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees,. dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66024(x), has begun. If you fail. to file a protest within this 94-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 6602x, yciu will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. f PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of August, 204(}, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll Ball vase: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NaES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: /s/ Ciddy ~Jordell Ciddy Wardell City Planner APPROVED; /sl Jerry Stevens Jerry Stevens Design Review Committee g: /planningldrdl b-.4SA-OJ resa.dnc Applkation Nurtibsi ~ ~~ f ~~~~,~a~~..,~ ^ ~ + :I ~+7P~~ Case Manager _ ~ . ,~ ICI I,I r u z r e~~ ~~ '~ o~~~ 0 r e r 0 k a t ~ i~~ F ~~ PLAGE ~,~ oz~~ U _.. _ . _AN ~ ~ ~~ 'P; ir' 1i~ g y.~~7,~ ~~1 APPRpVAL /gyp -% S-~ _ ~. ~v DRC ~ Nurr._:yr ~ -~ t ~ Signature ____ i Casa ~&~ --^-- PROPOSED NEW KITCHEN / 1=AMILY ROOM PLAN SCALE. in" . f-O' Q~ =, r u z r o .~ r ~ O ~(E( O ~ r ` K a d r O rl,ltl z o ,~ z~~ ~~~ i ~I t€( RICsHT ELEVATION G~~~ _~ W 0 O ~ ~ I( ~ ~ ^ Y CaI r e 0 rl.l:l ~"..~,..~.r__.._......_._...ter---~.~~_~--_.......~s~._.. - ~~! LEFT ELEVATION ~ APPROVAL /~ _ ~ s~ _~,1 i FRONT ELEVATION oRC ^ ~w~er CC// '~ O _ Gl(J ~ EXISTINCs SUIL.DINGz ELEYAtIONS WITH NEW ~4DDITION A7 KItCHEN q Ca.e Manager o ~~ ~~; Zt s~~ ~~ wwoau ar+c vocr+a ro narc,+ ex~srM~ ca.oR aHO erne ~rwooo ercrr+~ wtN vcxricet sane to natra+ ex18TMG r uGUt [.w.r Boor wn~ uA+rre nau+ ~ More, er+rwe aoomor+ ro oe urroex rx~erna RooF ov~rsua~