No preview available
ASA-2001-17b10300 Tarre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 T'eFephone: (408} ???-3308 FAX: (408) ???-3333 COMMUNITY DEY'ELCPMENT July 19, 2001. Mr. Gerry Ploaf The O'Brien Group 2001 Winward Way, Ste. 200 San Mateo, CA 94404 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW COTv1MITTEE ACTION LETTER -Application 1.7-ASA-01 This letter confirms the decision of the Design Review Committee, given at the meeting of June 1$, 2001, approving an architectural and site approval for a new 4,644 square foot residence, according to Design Review Resolution No. 59. Please be aware that if this permit is not used within two years, it shall expire on July 18, 2003. Also note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days of the decision. Tf this occurs, you will be notified of a public hearing which will lac scheduled before the City Council, Sincerely, ~~~,~ Ciddy Wor City Planner Eiaclosures: ~~ L~ Resolution No. S9 ~:plannngflDRC Committee/action letter 17-ASA-ol Printed' on Recycled Paper 17-ASA-~ Y CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION 59 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW' COMII`vIIITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAII I~ OR A NEW 4,644 S(~UARE FOOT RESIDENCE. (OAI~ VALLEY) SECTION I: PRO:IECT DESCRIP"PION Application No.: l 7-ASA-01 Applicant: Gerry Ploof (The O'Brien Group} Location: 104$1 Serra Street (Oak Valley) SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and compatible with the surrotu~ding area; 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will. not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance, and the General Plan, as new restaurant will occupy a building historically used as a restaurant in a commercial center. 3. '-I'he design will not result in abrupt changes in building scale between the subject site and neighboring properties, as the project does not propose significant exterior changes. 4. `I,l~e proposal will use materials that compliment neighboring structures, as the proposal does not propose significant exterior changes.. NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testinxony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application no. 17-ASA-01, is here by approved; and. That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application 1?-ASA-Ol as set forth in t1-ie Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of .luly 18, 2001, and are incorporated by reference herein. R~sohation 1W©. 5'9 17-A5A-bl .ku~y l8, 2Da1 Pale 2 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval. is based on Sheets 1 _~ and the submitted color and material board except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. SHU'1"TER SIZE The size of the shutters shall be changed to appear to fully cover the windows, prior to building permit approval. ~. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein. may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation re~quire~nents, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Cade Section 66020(d) (1}, these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of [he amount of such fees, and a description of tl~e dedications, reservations, and. other exactions. Yau are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which. you may protest these fees,. dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 6f~020~(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18t~' day of .Iuly, 2001, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: /s/ Cidd Wordell Liddy Wordell City Planner Auerbach and Chairperson Corr APPROVED: /s/ Charles Corr Charles Corr, Chairperson Design Review Committee ~:/plannang/dre/`17-t.~'A-~1 res.c~"©c