Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ASA-2001-02b
10307 Tr~rre,4w~m~e Cupertino, CczZifor~~aaa X5014 Telephone: (4G'8) 777-33!)~~3 F~1X: (=tL1~) 777-33.3 C'C7rLlML~".~1r11'~' 17EY'f I C1!'1~IE,"JT January 25, 2001 Gerry Ploof (The O'Brien group) 2.1.170 Canyon ©alc 5~'ay Cupertino, CA 95[? 14 ~L1I3JECT: DESIC~1~1 REV`IF~,W CC)iV1Nil'I 7'l?l~ .AC'T[C)l~~ L>/TTER -Application 02-ASA-01 This letter confirms the decision of the Design Review Comrr~ittee, given at the mcetit2g of ,lanuary 2~1, 2001, approving an Architectural at~d site approval of a ~61~) scl. ft. residence (C-al{ ~r'alley), according to Design Review Resolution I'~o.~6 Please be aware that if this perrtzit is not used wi.tktin one year, it shall expire an January 2~1, 2002. Also n©te that an appeal of t17is decision cart be made within 14 calendar days of the decision. I1~ this occurs, volt ~~~i.ll be; rt.otified of a public hearing which tivill be schedatled before the City l'lannin~; Con~nlissiort. Sincerely, ~~ . ~~ Ciddv V4 ordell City- Planner l.nclosures: lt.csolution I~3o. 3t~ ~v-~~o ~:planningll7r~ lot-ASA-f71 Action letter !~ r r, y err ~r ~ -r ad F'apEr CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION N0.36 02-ASA-O1 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE REVIEW OF A 5,619 SQUARE FOOT RESIDENCE AT 21151 CAPON OAK WAY AT THE OAK VALLEY DEVELOPMENT SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: 02-ASA-O1 Applicant: O'Brien Group Location: 21151 Canyon Oak Way SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and compatible with the surrounding area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application no. 02-ASA-O1, is here by approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application 02-ASA-O1 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of January 24, 2001, and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on submitted plan sets and accompanying material board, except as may be amended by conditions contained within. 2. MAXIMUM HOUSE SIZE The loggia area shall be modified as shown in Exhibit A so that the maximum house size is not exceeded. Resolution No.36 02-ASA-01 January 24, 2001 Page 2 SECOND STORY DECK The front setback of the second story deck shall be modified to conform to the accessory structure ordinance. 4. ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS The architectural details recommended by Larry Cannon in his January 17, 2001 letter shall be included in the building permit plans, and approved by the Director of Community Development, except that the front balcony does not need to be modified. 5. NOTICE OF FEES. DEDICATIONS. RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of January, 2001, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN ABSENT: ATTEST: COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS /s/ Ciddy Wordell Ciddy Wordell City Planner APPROVED: /s/ Chuck Corr Chuck Corr Chairperson Design Review Committee g/planning/dre/02-ASA-O1 reso.doc ~Jl^,4 ~? r ~y~~~~~ i.~ 1 ;? ~~;i; .i ~:j~y.r',86 t• . ~~:. ~< ~~ •e j`C~ G~IA iF~"77fI ;' ~ A~ •GI~ V i .. ~, .__.-ter- f .JJ ~~, I.. ~. `- i ~ -~ ~~ ~r .a r ~ s~aL~rrl _ _ ... .. LOT 2.07 The O'Brien Group ,' ~~ i !~ St : 1 n.+ ~s=~. ~_.. Iii: ': _~ ~_ ._. `, _ Vf APPROVAL ~~ . ~~,_ Q~ DRC APp~icah ~ Number -~ "~4-~-~ ~ l S(gnature~~~~/°aje ~a~e Mana OAK VALLEY / CUPERTINO 0 :J (" C`. 3 ('~ 7 - L Gase Manager `~ 1 C O C c ~; ~- L SECOND FLOOR PLAN 4 APPiication Number I / DRC ~ ~ ' ale Signature ~r=~2P~,~ Case Manager L ~. '~ __ it a ~ i ~ I 0 0 ~ o o ~ __ o __ ( ~~~ 1_j i-~1 il! i I~~ ,~ r{--1j o0 ~ I ~ ~LI 11 v o .. G d I ~-' o o o .-._.-. _ .~ p - q _'__ - _- _- • ____ -- ,.. I _ i 4 ~ ; I a ~r, bl I/ q vi - - x RE4R ELEVATION Appllca ion Number DRC Date Signature ~G(~c~7~C~-~'" Case Manager --r _® ~_ -- e M Y Y F u r :. ~, RGPiT ELEVATION -~ n -- o q i ,-. - REAR GGURTYARD -~`. ',~. ~ ~ e o- o u o N C `. u L APPROVAL ,~ ~ ~ ~-,~`/~- - .-~ Appil ion Number oRC / - ~ , -- a / j ~; Date ~ Signature ~i/~n !.~/ Case Manager ,s j i~: ~ r i i i ~ Y i8 ~J~I ~I s II I ~t ' I I ~ 9 . _... ) < 1 FRGNT GGURIYARD ELEVATION 4 ~ ._. ~. e ~ i i I - I { _ 1 1 LEFT ELEVATION 4 n ~ .,..~ ....e ~J ( .~.. RIGti7 GG4RTYARD ELEVATIGN 4