ASA-2002-02b
~.r.~.~.
~'
CITY OF
CUPERJINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
August 28, 2002
Mr. Stanley Panko
Panko Architects
311 7th Avenue, Suite 1
San Mateo, CA 94401
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION LETTER - ASA-2002-02
This letter confirms the decision of the Planning Commission, given at the
meeting of August 26, 2002, approving an architectural and site approval to
renovate an existing commercial building and site, according to Planning
Commission Resolution No. 6155.
Please be aware that if this permit is not used within a two-year period, it shall
expire on August 26,2004.
Also, please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar
days. If this happens, you will be notified of a public hearing which will be
scheduled before the City Council.
Sincerely,
#-Gk(}~
Aarti Shrivastava
Senior Planner
Cc : Barbara Kalman, 875 Arcturus Circle, Foster City 94404
Kathy Baker, 369 Ann Circle, Indiana, P A 15701
g:jplanning/post hearing/action letter A SA -2002 -02
Printed on Recyr::'/ed Paper
ASA-2002-02
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6155
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE REVIEW FOR A F AC:ADE
IMPROVEMENT AND SITE AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS.
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
ASA-2002-02
Stanley Square (Panko Architects)
21666-21686 Stevens Creek Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for
Architectural and Site Approval, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposal is beneficial and compatible
with the surrounding area; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the following
requirements:
1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
general welfare, or convenience;
2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance, and the General
Plan, in that the design is consistent with the Monta Vista Design Guidelines and an
enhanced pedestrian experience.
3. The proposal will use materials and design elements that compliment neighboring
structures and are consistent with the Manta Vista Design Guidelines.
4. The proposal includes landscaping and a pedestrian-oriented streetscape that will soften
the appearance of the structure.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the Application No. ASA-2002-02, is hereby approved; and
Resolution No. 6155
Page 2
ASA-2002-02
August 26, 2002
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution
are based are contained in the public hearing record concerning Application ASA-2002-02 as
set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of August 26, 2002 and are
incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on the submitted plan set entitled "Stanley Square" by Panko
Architects last revised August 5, 2002 and material board and color elevations
received on August 19, 2002, except as may be amended by the conditions contained
in this Resolution.
2. SIGNAGE
All signage shall be consistent with the Sign Code Title 17. Alternatively, a master
sign program will need to be approved by the Planning Commission.
3. BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL
The Director of Community Development shall review the final building permits for
full conformance with this approval and the design approval prior to issuance of
building permits.
4. LANDSCAPING
All trees shall be a minimum of 36" box and the shrubs shall be 15 gallon.
5. INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT
The applicant shall record a deed restriction for necessary reciprocal ingress and
egress easements to and from the subject property and adjacent properties to the west
subject to approval of the City Attorney. The easement shall be recorded prior to
issuance of building permits.
6. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
Pedestrian easements over the sidewalk area and through the interior courtyard shall
be prepared by the developer, approved by the City Attorney and recorded against
the subject property prior to issuance of building permits.
7. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults, backflow preventers and similar above
ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or
located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas.
Said equipment locations shall be determined prior to issuance of building permits.
Resolution No. 6155
Page 3
ASA-2002-02
August 26, 2002
8. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020( d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of
a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications,
reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day
approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations and
other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail
to file a protest within this 9o-day period complying with all of the requirements of
Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with
City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
2. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance
with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
3. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Surface flow across
public sidewalks may be allowed in the R-1, R-2 and R-3 zones unless storm drain
facilities are deemed necessary by the City Engineer. Development in all other zoning
districts shall be served by on site storm drainage facilities connected to the City storm
drainage system. If City storm drains are not available, drainage facilities shall be
installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
4. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of
Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices for any new utility installation associated with this
project. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground
provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility
provider and the City Engineer. Applicant is not required to underground existing
utilities along Stevens Creek Boulevard or Imperial Avenue as part of this project.
5. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of
Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and
Resolution No. 6155
Page 4
ASA-2002-02
August 26, 2002
inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of
utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits.
Fees:
a, Checking & Inspection Fees:
$ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or
$2,268.00 minimum
N/A
$ 1,000.00
N/A
b. Grading Permit:
c. Development Maintenance Deposit:
d. Storm Drainage Fee:
e, Power Cost:
f. Map Checking Fees:
g. Park Fees:
h, Street Tree
**
N/A
N/A
By Developer
** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC
Bonds:
a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements
b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement
c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by
the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of
recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change
or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
NOTE: Fees and bonds paid previously for required improvements not completed
but required to be completed will be credited towards current fees and bonds.
6. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources
Control Board, for construction activity which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be
included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment
control plan shall be provided.
7. TREE GRATES
Tree grates along Imperial Avenue must adhere to the Manta Vista Design guidelines.
The encroachment permit shall cover for this work within the City's right of way.
8. PARKING
'rhe entire proposed Imperial Avenue road section adjoining the site, induding the
dimensions necessary for diagonal street parking, as called for by the Monta Vista
Plan, shall be shown. on the final site plans.I'he section shall include previously
Resolution No. 6155
Page 5
ASA-2002-02
August 26,2002
required reconstruction of the Imperial Avenue sidewalk adjacent to the building and
reconstruction of the curb. Final design of the diagonal street parking will reflect the
optimal configuration in conformance vvith City of Cupertino Standard Details.
CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF
ACCEPT ANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS
(Section 66474.18 California Government Code)
/ s/ Ralph Qualls
Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works
City Engineer CA License 22046
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August 2002, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Auerbach, Chen, Saadati, Wong and Chairperson Corr
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
/ s/ Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki, Director
Department of Community Development
/ s/ Charles Corr
Charles Corr, Chairperson
Planning Commission
c: \Planning\ PDREPORT\RES \ASA-2002-02 res.doc
~ ~~
Ii" !~
~~ H
;;~ ]I
~~ "~
..
~Z
Z::: v
tj~~
l.) ::2 " ~
~ ~ ~ ~
0.. -< l;\llr
01:0 fu 4
:r: . I \)
VI W II) 0
0; ~ ~
Z -""
o 5?'~ ~
~ ~ ~ \)
>.....'"
OZN
Z~
.... '"
..
c
LEFT-SIDE ELEVATION
~
II
.
I
I ""I""".I.~~Q,=_
~I
I 'l<!"-,,,,,,,,m>Xl<""'''''__
I
I
I L(fI~,f~~
i I
I I~
_-b~~\-~;i~,>;;:-~
~~I
.-~
t I
\ ~ ."n"~.
_ L--__
\
\ '^"=,~,-,~
\
~
rosrm"'1Y.c....~
~;''' ~:;gl m,~?m
~fl'r1[~
;;:'i!lli!Jkir~
...............
;;:'m:nf'1lli
.......
GUlllAHI "'~uu.. ""L
jMl)STE\fEtjSCllED<BLW..STE.2~
;;:r:i::r=
~ ~
'" ~"
ZW \l 0:
a:: ~ ~ ~
15~~~
mli.. 0
~ ~ ~ ~
oz'" "
z"<" f
o Iii' a
~ :ll
> '"
o "
~
rorM.SllEAAEk
TOTAL BUlI.DoN~ IdlEk
H
14.:!7t5.F".
.1.~ SF
2,117"'-
1,76~ sc
{su....., ..,,)'''"~ ,",f""~_}
(\>.'PEJWl'Ol'O\\lfIG)
(GU,I'IA':sPIllERIA)
(o;Pffi~NO i"l0T0 CEN1EI':)
(H~=CEl'TJ
~ ~
P~:~::~':;~l 1m- <::ALCS. "EUJW) .3Il
(M4 + 1214 + 21'.7 + 176g) I "'" _ ,.. "fl(lS
B.RESTA\JR....'IT.~jo~""AlE"""
~ DoW. + (+I':il:i\TS X 1/i)
H~~MRV (I~CI... W:) c 2J ,IJ.ITO$
~F'I>.CT (oIOX~ -l~lII.Iros
HIIIOCIIl' P~.RKiNC
(I "'~CE V.oJ< * olE)
- ffiiASIC
.:.:;" Itl. O!'2~
A1
2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN
P AW US~
B('ITN,IC~.L NAME CnlMC'N NAME SIZE _ __ S=W:;ING SUN E:>;~OS'"RE
~
8::R8ER!St-lUM8ERG
'CR'MSCN ~i~Mv'
>ETE:~ eICOlO~
~SC"'LLO~IA 'COMPAKTA
HEMERCCALI$ '$1tLLA DE ORO'
RHAPHIOLEr>lS ItlOlCA
GALERINA'
GROLJ~J[)(~OVFR
CI5WS$I(NlOERQII
CO~ONEI\STER [)~MME~ BEARBE~RY COTONEMHER
GAZANIA 'Wf-ITE'
ROSMARINl'S 'HUWINcm". CARFET
ffiACHELOSPERML'>lASIATlCUM
""'-
BOUGAINvilLEA 'SAN DIEGO RED'
J.o.St.lINUM POLYANTHUI.<
fRAa-IELOSPERMUM ASIAT]'~UM ASIA JASIv:~::
2 PROPOSED PLANT LIST
CRHK eOULEV"'~D
//' '\
,/ ".
=_~__li__~,o
i!1i Q 0 e <: :
I I
uJ .1
1
I
--- m _nnn.uu ,. uni nn nu....
EXISTING BJILDING I
I
I
I
L~~-l
I
I
,-"""'-~
,/ -6,\.,..,.;,'>f<",'
~-
- ~~r;1IIl'1C-'o
.a' o~M;; ml1
.--
, -+Ff,R."'....""".I._~
.-
1i\',"""""WI!F.->WO!<;."lio
I
I
1 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
Iii-II
~
-. i "I
II
~
~
o~Jt
z< IJ)lI\
E:>~~
Ol'Y~"
a;iVjIj}Q
O~~I'~Z
~~ii
1;;'
'"
i ~
..
D
~~
-~A2
I
II
~
I~~
~i ~!
:r: . ~"
'" LU If) ~
O~~ ~
~::t" ~
~~ ~ \)
i~~
2 FRONT ELEVATION
HI,
""'N>"I~ E ! ~ ~
~ . ~"
aI~ ~
;! Ii
~ N ~
~ ~ ~"
i~~
I
LEFT-SIDE ELEVATION
LEFT.SIOE ELEVATION
4 SIGN CRITERIA - FRONT ELEVATION
SIGN CRITERIA ~ FRONT ELEVATION
5 SIGN CRITERIA- LEFT-SIDE ELEVATION
SIGN CRITERIA - LEFT-SIDE ELEVATION
II
~
~i ~ X
!~~!
"'!::j"!j
"'<~F
o i1. '" Ii
Zit i'i ~
e >.>: ~"
f:l~
~~N
..
$CJoI.t. M!'. 1"0'
D
-"A4
+
If
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~
f~-
~----,1'.:~~~ --i
.:~T~::", :~m .OUlE;;~~,,""
~'"' ~ ""':s;-~~___
(E;!>=>,,:".::_ _ ___ _.....
~,;,,;,~~-;;;.~I
~"'.
-~-'\
. /
~'
~
I
I
~I
I
I
I
It----:t,JC;OI(:...~"l,
I I
I I
I I
I ~~ ","me""
I "'~:;", i \
-~~m~
__uj- L~-rij
1,,--- I ..
2 EXISTING SITE PLAN
i Ii
~ I ~I
ll'I. I=~~I
=W'~ 1- __t_
~='Ne ~iLDIN6n I
I
@i<']
,~.
lIl'.>.:IMi:l.1
""""'"'
''''''''E''''"'''''''''''
~
II
~
~
~
%
UI,
E~'2::
o;li ~ ~
:J: . I! _
"'... '" 2
O~~ ~
e>.: i il
i<::::I"
:p
Ii;
..
D
~ s"p
~ OAl'I" ct-<l~"'~
~ "'-'"-" M5+JIoN
~ ::. :~~
! -~A5
!lCo/IU!oI'.1l)' ..-.Qf.
1 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN
Ih,
Z~oll"
E ~.-
o <
:r:. "
"'~ollci
15:d~
e~~ !
~'<~i"
~ii
Iii
..
4 EXISTING RIGHT-SIDE ELEVATION
D
3 EXISTING REAR ELEVATION
--
A6
~~.I'.c'