TR-2025-013 - Approval Action Letter
June 18, 2025
Charles Rosenberg
6033 Shadygrove Dr.
Cupertino, CA 95014
SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT ACTION LETTER – Application TR-2025-013
This letter confirms the decision of the Director of Community Development, given on
June 18, 2025 approving the Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal of one 21 3/8-inch-
DBH, specimen Cedrus deodara (Deodar Cedar) located in the front yard on the left side of
the driveway of a residence located at 6033 Shadygrove Drive in Cupertino.
Staff has made the necessary findings contained in CMC 14.18.180 that the tree proposed
for removal can cause potential damage to existing essential structures and cannot be
controlled or remedied through reasonable relocation or modification of the structure,
and that the protected tree(s) are a detriment to the subject property and cannot be
adequately supported according to good urban forestry practices due to the
overplanting or overcrowding of trees on the subject property.
The 21 3/8” DBH Deodar Cedar is located 5’-3” from the wall of the residence (within the
15’ to 20’ Deodar Cedar canopy span), tree branches overhang the residence’s roof and
the homeowner has received an inspection report from their property insurance
company identifying that there are tree hazards in close proximity to the home.
Additionally, per the photographs submitted with the application, the tree’s roots are
uplifting the homeowner’s driveway and has caused it to crack and is uplifting the
neighbor’s driveway. Finally, there are three Deodar Cedar trees planted in a row to the
left of the driveway, spaced 5’-6” apart and so the trees will become overcrowded as
they mature.
These findings are necessary to grant the Tree Removal Permit in accordance with
Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC) Section 14.18.180 (A)(1) and CMC 14.18.180(A)(3).
The application is approved with the following conditions:
TR-2025-013 Page 2 of 4
6033 Shadygrove Drive
June 18, 2025
1. APPLICATION AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
This approval for tree removal is based on the photographs, measurements and
insurance property inspection report submitted by the owner of the property, Charles
Rosenberg, on May 7, 2025 and May 31, 2025, as well as the arborist evaluation dated
3/18/2025, composed by certified arborist, James R. Lewis (#WE3984A) with The Tree
Team, Tree Care Professionals.
2. ACCURACY OF THE PROJECT PLANS
The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data
including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property
size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records.
Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may
require additional review.
3. IN-LIEU TREE REPLACEMENT FEE
The required replacement for the removal of one 21’-3/8”-diameter protected tree is
two 24-inch-box trees. However, the owner of the property has chosen to pay the in-
lieu replacement tree fee for two 24-inch-box trees since the property has multiple
existing trees which limits replanting locations.
In-Lieu Fee Calculation for Two 24-Inch-Box Trees: The City uses the cost of a coast
live oak tree to determine the in-lieu fee. Per the Public Works division’s arborist 24-
inch-box oak trees are $225 each which is $450 for two, while one 36-inch-box oak
tree is $595, so I will use the less expensive amount of $450. Then the cost of
installation is from the 2025 Northern California Director of Industrial Relations
Wage Determination for a Landscape Maintenance Laborer in Santa Clara County
which is $16.50 per hour multiplied by 8 hours (4 hours to install each of the two 24-
inch-box tree, confirmed by the City’s Public Works arborist) which equals $132. So,
$450 plus $132 equals $582 multiplied by 1.5 which equals $873 for the in-lieu fee for
the two required 24-inch-box replacement trees.
4. NESTING BIRDS
Nests of raptors and other birds shall be protected when in active use, as required by
the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Department of Fish and
Game Code.
a. Construction and tree removal/pruning activities shall be scheduled to
avoid the nesting season to the extent feasible. If feasible, tree removal
and/or pruning shall be completed before the start of the nesting season to
help preclude nesting. The nesting season for most birds and raptors in the
San Francisco Bay area extends from February 1 through August 31.
b. If construction activities and any required tree removal occur during the
nesting season (February 1 and August 31), the owner of the property or
tree removal service shall conduct a preconstruction visual inspection of
TR-2025-013 Page 3 of 4
6033 Shadygrove Drive
June 18, 2025
the tree prior to removal. Preconstruction surveys shall be conducted no
more than 14 days prior to the start of tree removal, pruning or
construction. Preconstruction surveys shall be repeated at 14-day intervals
until construction has been initiated in the area after which surveys can be
stopped.
c. If the survey does not identify any nesting birds that would be affected by
construction activities, no further mitigation is required. If an active nest
containing viable eggs or young birds is found sufficiently close to work
areas to be disturbed by these activities, their locations shall be
documented, and protective measures implemented under the direction of
a qualified ornithologist until the nests no longer contain eggs or young
birds.
d. Protective measures shall include establishment of clearly delineated
exclusion zones (i.e. demarcated by identifiable fencing, such as orange
construction fencing or equivalent) around each nest location as
determined by the qualified ornithologist, taking into account the species
of birds nesting, their tolerance for disturbance and proximity to existing
development. In general, exclusion zones shall be a minimum of 300 feet
for raptors and 75 feet for passerines and other birds. The active nest within
an exclusion zone shall be monitored on a weekly basis throughout the
nesting season to identify signs of disturbance and confirm nesting status.
The radius of an exclusion zone may be increased by the qualified biologist,
if project activities are determined to be adversely affecting the nesting
birds. Exclusion zones may be reduced by the qualified biologist only in
consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The
protection measures and buffers shall remain in effect until the young have
left the nest and are foraging independently or the nest is no longer active.
e. A final report on nesting birds and raptors, including survey methodology,
survey date(s), map of identified active nests (if any), and protection
measures (if required), shall be submitted to the Planning Manager,
through the building permit review process, and be completed to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director prior to the start of
grading.
5. INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
As part of the application, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall
agree to indemnify, defend with the attorneys of the City’s choice, and hold harmless
the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees, and agents (collectively, the
“indemnified parties”) from and against any liability, claim, action, cause of action,
suit, damages, judgment, lien, levy, or proceeding (collectively referred to as
“proceeding”) brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties
or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant related to any Ordinance,
Resolution, or action approving the project, the related entitlements, environmental
TR-2025-013 Page 4 of 4
6033 Shadygrove Drive
June 18, 2025
review documents, finding or determinations, or any other permit or approval
authorized for the project. The indemnification shall include but not be limited to
damages, fees, and costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys’
fees, and other costs, liabilities, and expenses incurred in connection with such
proceeding whether incurred by the Applicant, the City, or the parties initiating or
bringing such proceeding.
The applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City its actual
attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. Such attorneys’ fees and
costs shall include amounts paid to the City’s outside counsel and shall include City
Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs
directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. The applicant shall
likewise agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the indemnified parties from
and against any damages, attorneys’ fees, or costs awards, including attorneys’ fees
awarded under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, assessed or awarded against
the indemnified parties. The Applicant shall cooperate with the City to enter a
Reimbursement Agreement to govern any such reimbursement.
The Applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City for all costs
incurred in additional investigation or study of, or for supplementing, redrafting,
revising, or amending, any document (such as an Environmental Impact Report,
negative declaration, specific plan, or general plan amendment) if made necessary by
proceedings challenging the project approvals and related environmental review, if
the applicant desires to continue to pursue the project.
The Applicant shall agree that the City shall have no liability to the Applicant for
business interruption, punitive, speculative, or consequential damages.
6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.
Please note that an appeal of this decision may be made within 14 calendar days
from the date of this letter. If an appeal is filed, you will be notified of a public
hearing, which will be scheduled before the Planning Commission. Please wait to
remove the tree until the
Sincerely,
Catherine Tarone
Planning Permit Technician
(408) 777-3297
catherinet@cupertino.gov