Loading...
CC 09-03-2025 Item No. 19. Commission Oversight of Transportation Matters_Staff PresentationCITY OF CUPERTINO commission Oversight of Transportation Matters CUPERTINO Current Practice • Bicycle Pedestrian Commission (BPC) sole commission to review and advise regarding transportation matters • Review includes transportation policy documents, as well as conceptual and construction plans • Focus on bike/ped, but input can extend to broader issues per Muni Code charter: • "...City transportation matters including, but not limited to, bicycle and pedestrian traffic, parking, education and recreation within Cupertino." • Planning Commission not involved, as transportation projects generally do not affect land use • Exception: General Plan conformance Why Are We Here? • City Council has expressed interest in potentially involving Planning Commission (PC) in review of transportation matters • This requires re-evaluation of structure of commission review, to clearly define roles of PC and BPC in the review of transportation projects • Any changes require CMC modification to redefine commission charters Some Alternatives to Consider Option 1 - Split responsibilities between BPC and PC • PC reviews: • Vision and Master Plans with longer term goals and defined project lists • BPC reviews: • Transportation conceptual and construction plans; policy documents focused on bike/ped that have little to no vehicle impact • Pros: • Retains BPC expertise on transportation construction projects and bike/ped-related policy docs • PC engagement on long-term docs provides broader planning lens • Cons: • May result in confusion regarding boundaries of responsibility as line between vision studies and concept plans can blur Some Alternatives to Consider Option 2 - Expanded PC Role • PC reviews: • Broader planning docs, as well as conceptual and design plans for projects that may impact vehicular travel • PC would provide approval for projects and plans that don't require CC approval • BPC reviews: • Remaining design plans focused on multimodal elements with no impact on vehicular travel • Pros: • PC input on potentially impactful projects supports broader citywide goals • BPC continues role in multimodal-focused project review • Cons: • BPC loses ability to advise on bike/ped projects if the project has the potential to impact vehicular operations Some Alternatives to Consider Option 3- Rename BPC to "Transportation and Mobility Commission" • PC reviews: • No transportation project review unless specifically requested by CC • BPC reviews: • All transportation matters, including projects relating primarily to vehicular travel even if not focused on bike/ped • Pros: • Maintains current structure with minimal disruption • Cons: • May not address CC interest in broader PC engagement Some Alternatives to Consider Option 4 - Transition all transportation matters to PC • PC reviews: • All transportation matters. PC renamed as "Planning and Transportation Commission" • BPC reviews: • None. BPC is disbanded. • Pros: • Centralizes decision making for land use and transportation projects • Potentially improves coordination between planning and mobility efforts • Cons: • Loss of specialized bike/ped advisory body, with potential impact to active transportation grant eligibility • Risk of reducing focus on multimodal projects Additional Considerations • Any single transportation project should ideally be reviewed by no more than one commission. Multiple commission review could result in: • Confusion or conflict if PC and BPC offer differing recommendations • Disenfranchisement of commissioners whose input is disregarded • Additional staffing effort and cost resources • Clear criteria to differentiate which commission to review is necessary. • Assign CM the authority to make determination when unclear • Changes to current review process could influence scope, timing, and costs of transportation projects • $5k -$30k potential impact per project, depending on complexity Next Steps • CC provides direction to staff this evening. • If changes to current process are recommended, staff will return to CC with necessary ordinances and/or policies to implement changes to CMC. Thank you