CC Resolution No. 8379
RE3OIlJI'ION 00. 8379
A RE3OIDl'ION OF THE Cl'I'Y CXXJNCIL OF THE Cl'I'Y OF aJPERl'INO
AtJIH:,IU:ZIr«; EXEX:m'ION OF Þ.GREEMFNl' AND APPRJPRIATION OF FUNDS
WHmEAS, a scc:pa of services far a study to determine the relationship
between larñ uses am hoosing needs and possible hoosing mitigation
methods has been ~ SCllt:ed to the City O::Iun::il and said scc:pa of services
is accept:able¡ am
WHmEAS, the Affordable Housing cœmittee has reviewed ~"PC""'1" for
this study and has J:ec> ........n!ed that the firm of planning ResOOrCe
AssOCiates be selected to con:iUct the study am that O::Iun::il authorize an
éIHJL~iation of $26,750 in æR in-lieu fees fran the Affordable Housing
Furñ far this CQ ILLaet¡
lU'l ~úRE, BE IT REIDLVED that the City O::Iun::il authorizes an
awLl.¥Liation of $26,750 in æR in-lieu fees fran the Affordable Housing
Furñ to funj the aforementioned study am authorizes the Director of
Cœmmity Develcpnent to execute an agreement with the consulting firm of
planning ResOOrCe AssOCiates to perform the services referenced in said
Scope of Services¡
PASSED AND ADOPl'ED at a regular meeting of the city O::Iun::il of the
City of OJpertino this 6th day of May, 1991 by the follCMing' vote:
~:
MEMB~ OF THE Cl'I'Y mr1NC'TT,
AYES:
OOES:
ABSENl':
ABSTAIN:
Rogers, Sorensen, Szabo, Koppel
None
Goldman
None
APPRJ\1ED:
/s/ Barb Koppel
MAYeR, Cl'I'Y OF aJPERl'INO
A:J.'.l'="l':
/s/ Dorothy Cornelius
Cl'I'Y c:::LmK
SCDPE OF ~I'"R<:
'IO cx:NXJCl' A S'lU)Y 'IO EXAMINE THE RErATIœSHIP OF lAND USE
AND THE æEATIœ OF AIDITIONAL HXJSIN:; NEED
I. BAŒGRCUND:
state law requires that the City of Q¡pertino address identified
regional hœsing needs am the relatiooship between job creation and
hœsing needs. Hoosing infarmatioo shows that a number of factors
oontriJ:ute to a hœsing shartage in 0Jperti.n0. 0Jperti.n0 is an
enployment center which provides DX:Ire jots than enployed residents,
resulting in a ,^"I~tioo far hœsing.
'Ihe city Council is considering the ~oo of new policies am
¡n...,p;ams to encx:PJrage ar require the provision of lltproved housing
UM,JULLünities in CUpertino.
As the first stage in a majar General Plan reviE!lil7, the City Ca.mcil
has adcpted revised Hoosing Element Policy 3-4 which states that the
City shall:
"Conduct a study to determine the relatiooship between land uses
am hœsing needs am possible a6'''r~rrt: ~. <Oe(b¡res far paying
fees, providing hœsing units, ar oontrib.Iti.n1 toward mitigation
in other ways. 'Ihe City shall then require that all kims of
devel'¥""'lt where such a relatiooship is established shall
mitigate increased needs far affordable hœsing thJ:a.1gh fees and
in other ways such as direct provisioo of ~ units as part
of the develcpœnt."
II. SCDPE OF w:>RK:
'Ihe study will potentially consist of trNo p¡ases. RIase I is a
nexus study to analyze the relatiooship bebieen develcpœnt
(residential, Cu....... cial am i.rñustrial) am the creatioo of
additional hœsing needs far varioos inoane groops. If this nexus
is established, RIase II of the study ~ analyze alternative
hœsing mitigatioo methcds.
A. RIase I:
1. Calsider the kind am aun.mt of develcpœnt prevalent in
0Jpertin0 am analyze projecticns far future devel'4,'lIellt in
relatioo to the hœsing needs created.
2. Identify am analyze the direct am in:li.rect adverse inpacts
of varioos types of new devel'¥""'lt (residential,
'^",..........ial, i.rñustrial, etc.) upcn the projected hœsing
needs of the city.
3. Quantify these iopacts in such a manner as to furnish
su¡:port am justificatim for the iDp:Jsitim of hoosing
mitigatim """''''IreS upcn new develcpoent.
4. Pl~ specific criteria regarding the degree and extent
that hoosing mitigatim measures can be required of
particular types of new devel~rt; based upcn the :i.Dpacts
which have been quantified. O::1'Isider whether certain
thresholds or types of devel~rt; sha.ù.d be limited or
exeupted am/or the annmt of fees be graduated depen;iing on
the Jdn:i of devel~rt;.
B. R1ase II:
1. DL"C'lSS the relative advantages am disadvantages of
collecting hoosing mitigatim fees versus man:1atory bJilding
of m site-haJsing. As part of the analysis, consider the
annmt of larñ available for hoosing under CUl.Lelrt; zoning.
DiEo1SS when hoosing shœld be required versus when an
in-lieu fee shœld be accepted.
2. Develq:¡ alternative farnulas which cx:W.d be used if a
hoosing mitigatim fee is paid in lieu of providing hoosing
units. Disn,,= the merit of using one farm.ùa versus
another am why the I'eC' .......J)jed method is preferred.
DL<><:"'..... hew it cœpares to alternative methods used in other
jurisdictions.
3. O::1'Isidering projecl:ej devel~rt; in CUpertino, est:iJnate the
number of hoosing units or annmt of fees that waùd be
generated when the alternative methods are a¡:plied.
4. Analyze what pe1:oe1Jtage of hoosing units in residential
develq:ments am hoosing units that are provided t'hJ:'Q.¡gh ,_
mixed use devel~rt; shœld be affordable to low am very
low imcme hcuseholds.
repartB\nexsocpe\