TR-2023-058 Action Letter (dead) Comm . F lopme t De+2U,161 jeLG4ITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PIE M�3-05
sion - upe?FANNING DIVISION
�CUPERTIN4 ROVE
CITY HALL
Case # 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
LM—MMMINM Numbers TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 • FAX: (408) 777-3333
CUPERTINO CUPERTINO.ORG
Approval Body: Director/ Staff
Approva I Date 12/15/23
Signature VAI 'J&ZD23
Case Manager
Wendell Kerr
7954 Sunderland Drive
Cupertino, CA 95014
SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT ACTION LETTER-Application TR-2023-058
This letter confirms the decision of the Director of Community Development, given on
December 15,2023 approving a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal of one(1)dead
21-inch-diameter Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) protected specimen tree in the front
yard of a single-family residence located at 7954 Sunderland Drive in Cupertino.
Staff has made the finding that the protected tree is dead based on the definition provided
in CMC Section 14.18.020 of the City's Protected Tree Ordinance.The finding is necessary
to grant the tree removal permit in accordance with Cupertino Municipal Code CMC
Section 14.18.150 (B)(2).
The application is approved with the following conditions:
1. APPROVED PROJECT
This approval is based on the certified arborist report prepared by Ann Northrup(ISA
Certified Arborist, #WE-1613A), dated December 3, 2023 with an addendum added
dated December 10,2023 consisting of 4 pages that include an evaluation of the health
of the tree,a photo of the dead tree, and an evaluation of the lack of planting space on
the property for replacement trees.
2. ACCURACY OF THE PROTECT PLANS
The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data
including but not limited to property boundary locations,building setbacks,property
size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records.
Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may
require additional review.
7954 Sunderland Court Page 2 of 4
Comm
niJ ev8Q�,lozgpent Department
ec er 15
Planning Division — Cupertino
cuPERTINo 3. TRFAR&OWAMMENT
Case # Tom .$*5bas chosen to pay the in-lieu replacement tree fee instead of planting
la, omam bEtd( es. The City uses the cost of a coast live oak tree to calculate the in-lieu
fee. Per the City's consultant arborist, the wholesale cost of a 24-inch-box coast live
Approval Body: Dky o /2 eta&
oa is e required replacement is two 24-inch-box trees, which would be $225
Approval Date 12a5�33d lay 2 dhi clg ;s T_- And the cost of installation is determined by the
Signature CathVbathT�nCalifornia Director of Industrial Relations Wage Determination which is
$15. VWM1 it multiplied by 8 hours (4 hours to install each 24-inch-box tree which
are work hours confirmed by the City's arborist)which equals$126.72.Then$450 plus
$126.72 equals$576.72 which is the total in-lieu fee that was paid.
4. NESTING BIRDS
Nests of raptors and other birds shall be protected when in active use, as required by
the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Department of Fish and
Game Code.
a. Construction and tree removal/pruning activities shall be scheduled to
avoid the nesting season to the extent feasible. If feasible, tree removal
and/or pruning shall be completed before the start of the nesting season to
help preclude nesting.The nesting season for most birds and raptors in the
San Francisco Bay area extends from February 1 through August 31.
Preconstruction surveys (described below) are not required for tree
removal or construction activities outside the nesting period.
b. If construction activities and any required tree removal occur during the
nesting season (February 1 and August 31), a qualified ornithologist shall
be required to conduct surveys prior to tree removal or construction
activities. Preconstruction surveys shall be conducted no more than 14
days prior to the start of tree removal, pruning or construction.
Preconstruction surveys shall be repeated at 14-day intervals until
construction has been initiated in the area after which surveys can be
stopped. During this survey, the ornithologist shall inspect all trees and
other possible nesting habitats in and immediately adjacent to the
construction areas for nests.
c. If the survey does not identify any nesting birds that would be affected by
construction activities, no further mitigation is required. If an active nest
containing viable eggs or young birds is found sufficiently close to work
areas to be disturbed by these activities, their locations shall be
documented,and protective measures implemented under the direction of
the qualified ornithologist until the nests no longer contain eggs or young
birds.
d. Protective measures shall include establishment of clearly delineated
exclusion zones (i.e. demarcated by identifiable fencing, such as orange
construction fencing or equivalent) around each nest location as
determined by the qualified ornithologist, taking into account the species
7954 Sunderland Court Page 3 of 4
Comm
niJ ev8Q�,lozgpent Department
ec er 15
Planning Division — Cupertino
C u P E RT i n o A P P R aV IDrds nesting, their tolerance for disturbance and proximity to existing
Case # TR-2023-(0581opment. In general, exclusion zones shall be a minimum of 300 feet
Application Nu r(r)aptors and 75 feet for passerines and other birds.The active nest within
an exclusion zone shall be monitored on a weekly basis throughout the
Approval Body: Director/Stting season to identify signs of disturbance and confirm nesting status.
Approval Date 12/15/23 The radius of an exclusion zone maybe increased by the qualified biologist,
Signature Catherine Taron4f project activities are determined to be adversely affecting the nesting
case Mands. Exclusion zones may be reduced by the qualified biologist only in
consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The
protection measures and buffers shall remain in effect until the young have
left the nest and are foraging independently or the nest is no longer active.
e. A final report on nesting birds and raptors,including survey methodology,
survey date(s), map of identified active nests (if any), and protection
measures (if required), shall be submitted to the Planning Manager,
through the building permit review process, and be completed to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director prior to the start of
grading.
5. INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
As part of the application, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall
agree to indemnify, defend with the attorneys of the City's choice, and hold harmless
the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees, and agents (collectively, the
"indemnified parties") from and against any liability, claim, action, cause of action,
suit, damages, judgment, lien, levy, or proceeding (collectively referred to as
"proceeding")brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties
or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant related to any Ordinance,
Resolution, or action approving the project, the related entitlements, environmental
review documents, finding or determinations, or any other permit or approval
authorized for the project. The indemnification shall include but not be limited to
damages, fees, and costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys'
fees, and other costs, liabilities, and expenses incurred in connection with such
proceeding whether incurred by the Applicant, the City, or the parties initiating or
bringing such proceeding.
The applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City its actual
attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. Such attorneys' fees and
costs shall include amounts paid to the City's outside counsel and shall include City
Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs
directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. The applicant shall
likewise agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the indemnified parties from
and against any damages, attorneys' fees, or costs awards, including attorneys' fees
awarded under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, assessed or awarded against
7954 Sunderland Court Page 4 of 4
Comm
niJ ev8Q�,lozgpent Department
ec er 15
Planning Division — Cupertino
CUPERTINO the MM2.19WEQi parties. The Applicant shall cooperate with the City to enter a
Case # IT$RP$02a4O6i8 Agreement to govern any such reimbursement.
Application Number(s)
The Applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City for all costs
Approval Body: DipRt& 64�AaMditional investigation or study of, or for supplementing, redrafting,
Approval Date or amending, any document (such as an Environmental Impact Report,
Signature Cat*ggatjy @claration, specific plan, or general plan amendment) if made necessary by
proceediuSsEehallenging the project approvals and related environmental review, if
the applicant desires to continue to pursue the project.
The Applicant shall agree that the City shall have no liability to the Applicant for
business interruption, punitive, speculative, or consequential damages.
6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS,RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.
CMC 14.18.150(B)(2) Exemptions, permits the removal of dead trees before the
approval is granted provided that a retroactive tree removal permit is submitted
within 5 days. If an appeal is filed,you will be notified of a public hearing,which
will be scheduled before the Planning Commission.
Sincerely,
Catherine Tarone
Permit Technician
Planning Division
(408) 777-3297
catherinet@cupertino.gov
Enclosure: arborist report