The URL can be used to link to this page

ASAC 1992 - 1993 ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE MINUTES 1 of 3 1992 & 1993 OIL _ �.—._ ..___ .- - •r [/ „t •.:t•' .tom .. •I' •Y:It 3c'{i 4fs.`11i1:: •?' 1 L' .`;f't Y, a'7tJ Ir'7• • 11 a. Y' - N I.`� •� y;. air •.d 'f-_�} .' t I �.: - - _ _ _ « .i ;1.•.•v' >.• ..ter — - 11. -" a :•:•t_. = r • .,_ r.to, .'.• a » •.It • . •t. t•-• '.•.•, • Via• .- =• IF•' 1. t •f c•:r ca _ _ Ire � rI. }• .. '•1 �at •_ sue.: ... - .pr-r.-A "IG •1 - r f Fi e • y 13, 1992 Page 2- Continued Ommittee Ylember Lim stated that he Was happily with the appearance of the SSgnia. Ctemittee Member LrAos stated that the rendering has awayed her toward approval of the pact identification signs an the Me did stator that the other signs which staff was referring to fog p ioutian are very different in context and are not necessarily cotVarable with this approval. Cbmittee Member Weber stated that pmoduict Identi4ficatim on restaurants are different and that people need to know cat restaurants sell more so loan what furni ttn1e stamen sell. av& arson 3adman said that she was in support of the proposal. C7a mitt a Ymbet' Iavios questiaied the colors on the monument sign. It was discussed among the ommittee members and the applicant which color would be moot mate for the lines an the sign. It was agreed that sacddlebroun or tan as indicated ion the c.olarr' exhibit would be most aptz opriate. i siara: On a 4-0 vote appli,ceti an 23-ASAL`-91 was approved acanrding to "ie findings and tiaras contained in the model rss©lutien with condition eleven (21) modified to read as follows: Ue colors of the lines behind the tree an the mcmmaent sign shall be scitdcal film sadtdlebrown 7725-139 or tan 7725-39. 2. ligation S-ith & MLtb - Paquesting review and to add two new 3utrmatie teller machines at an existing bank located on the 94rx�M Drive. of C2vek Boulevard a p!aa+orsimately 170 ft. Gast of B and W Tbm fthillard reviewed the staff comments rota ig the scope of the project and stating that staff had no corg=rs with the prgx eyed AMMIS. Michael. Doran, Smith & Smith, reviewed staff cammnts and answered questions of the comittee members. A general consensus of the ocamittee members was that the proposal was acoeptable- Dec s On a 4-+0 vote application 1-ASAC:-92 was approved a%.=Zdinq to the findings and conditions contained in the mock 1 reselu`..ion. Ali I till 5A to 41 44 49 P91 to so r4 44 8104 to log >4.5 .8 EM Am Kimutes Jammy 13, -4- • ®coca I'M 3 - Lod ChaimJadom eWlaineed the histrcmy of the YWA. sae that tics is a hardsbip of ideaificatian, bui ing caonf t.�aari, and location., and tbaat ideratifi0atiensa is . so saw that 91ble' is In mWat of all Ores signs. Mo added that WW's role Im fmr to the sign mtinance and sibaUcins, if the Ma did not neaed an exceptim they would follow, the ordimm. Mr. BWALI=d eqgained that the existing monument sign in not in oonf5=== with the sick ardinaim. 11he sign ordinanca allows ftw graaand sign to be illuminated by ground lie is only and that the existing sign was internally illuminated. He stated that %hLle AMC is reviowing the sign e'smptian for the two sib they ay take into rx sideratian the granting of an emeption for that situation as well. mr. walker egp1aiaaed that he disagreed with ASAC's direction regnding the " " sign. He explained that the could add an a second portion to sign nzber thm oriented towards Saiah Way but could rat ineaoa ate it itato the existing sign or moor.a 1 ;I e it: into the htiildirg• O=aittee der Lavics explained that the majority of the ASAC members would rat approve the third "Ringo" sign and would only comer the sign emotion as a ccuplets package and nr' in in l parts. The cmmdttee member r that the anplicant work with staff and find a way in which all the signs oark far the site. s Ora a 3-0 vote, with Claaitpersar► Jaakan abstaining, application 2 ASAC-92 was continued to the meeting of January 27th in carder far the applicant to return with a move acceptable proposal. 4. AW 3 2 City of - Requesting review and %**oval of architecture for a stru�t to be built around an icy Qatar. Z4ze site is located an Prancio Court appr+oQtimately 140 ft. south of Homestead Load. Ttm Hobillard review the staff coannents noting the of the project and the reason why ASAlC is reviewing this proposal. Zhe general consensus of the crAuaittee members was that the proposal was astable. fon�s s On a 4-0 vote application 3-MAC-92 was aRprav+ed according to the findings and conditicns contained in the model resolution. IMMUMMEM 5. ication 14-X"l Ne"M - Requesting early review of a Use ® Permit for offices and storage in an existing 2,564 sq. ft. building located an the north side of Peninsula Avenue fly of and adjacent to Stevens Creek Boulevard. ul rt Nil jiv . aPtir 101 ID B g �}& .-�-s� "R:st� "� r'��s' "7' - v 4 ».:q ,r� �'> ; .- �it• �'n�" ��,"• `}xr ,.1 1" :7 s4Y 9 •' ... a ,-. r9 •��Il:�t i•+.__ Ott.•-:- _ •" : M' .i�_: y.v.i1 �♦f 71 4r:;i1,.7 � �:.. Kati-c 1,.:: i1. .c__t. _�+ �. irk: • -iU..c.,: u:c •1 `t"'_ 10300 MM AVOO, cmaam, cmuomm 9M4 E4083 -4505 ��qq�� OF i S ifT�7�LW�Zi4 {� W �M iJLV Sr 3iii �f60ilyM am = Cm OF CUPBMW MUM 27, 1992, HMMIG WD 1M CMQ7M= WM A, CUT ., XT 10300 MM AVD=# OO M# aMUMM 7he meting ids celled to aoder at 7:37 P.M. by vice Chaiir' aRobert Hmmie. VAmims Present., Howie, LAm, iavics, Weber, Jadcsoin Menters Abet: crane Staff Present: Tbm Iobi.11ard, Planner II -tee. -mane. 1. l ilic tion 2 2 Pit , - Requesting review aand approval for an emeption to the sign ordinance for signs in an institutional district. The site is mated on the North side of Alves Drive at the terminus of Saich ray. Tft Robillard revia and the staff ems, noting the direction given by ASAC at the previous mec*_ing. Jim Walker and Elizabeth Gallegos, from the YMM, review-ed the staff its and answered questions of the Omnittes Mom. Camittee Members Lim, lavias and Jackson, felt that the dal was aorzptalble as presented. Canuttee Member Weber felt that the Bingo sign should be placed on the existing monument sign. Chairperson, Homie expressed concern with previously installed illegal signs. It was agreed among the Oommitte MaW3ers that no otter building mounted signs w4.11 be allowed and that the lights inside the existing monument ent. sign should :s reduced U, cut down on the apt of glare. Mr. Walker asked for clarification of buildity mounted signs and der the existing YNM portion above the front entrance was accepta'xle. ,c .L l,( fib., •'.� �� - I-�. ..�.t}.R.: ,� ?' :. �.,•..� .:: `;is :<:. _c.: ca;c�•e' .'..•s.- ..�:a st . .. - .a i •I •l L� •. •. !+'r. t" � ;i. _ .}:5- •.i-.• a•''. •- s: tC�- t G• •:r'�. •,-y;� r •L' iLi • ✓:�� ; s)-' - .1 ..,=• s:,. - •.•:!!'^-t �. :• �1.: '•L' :•..1: ..IIL + ^ 'drr} F iC4..A � ♦, _ L.• r'•:1 i 11•••=7 - � •: � • ♦_�'• _.•-=�• 11 • • tli�l �.n ' .J .:.J � ►_ . .�- .Lal::.=.` �,. _r.lr . - tr. •.,'":IF. . w �. ;. v ••�-<. •- •r. ♦far=.,. ti, - •- t �w •}_ -_ i -.:�. - �•:Il'�1 -- .,=III i C:a'-_ 717. •• III =.al✓•J s�La �6.9 t. ",..r • .:•'•• -•ICJ' .•. Y':•i. •�.��•. • :1:1 '•.•J-. .I11. a �' r,LL •I TAi r II•' I •. rl' ♦1 �. _ - ��•' •" ire +1•;••I:v •. •'•-•.-,-.. WIt so it r +. a'-•� w-'r••---•.'_:•` •.•--w. - ,•. it. • :• •. - :.r r :r •L , �,. ;..� ♦'•TI DTI '^ :.:.11�•:.=1." N 'v.._ .:err." _ - _ _ .. - •T •.. rf f•t _ r- rt 1� -1• _tit... •:�:Ti tt r CAI'•; it C. re •'' • •1 .Jh•:. •i all �1. If im ` C o 1. d .. � i. - - .'�i.'.-war -. �tl'.•.,G. q '. :}.... ,«-11;•..'C'a A :r.lt •r ._ " r• •t. - - • _ •! _:•'_ •^ •:' •T:=• :r =.,► �'.�"I7 it — .=)II•.� N — �! a ' v _ t<- . •v9pti _ .III-•'. •.� — .'•• al. _•, •L..�. ..•.r —.� • — ;_T, a •�'.'1rU - f:;.,t�. :ha w •'c -`r� 1 ..� e.'ii=- :.nsi a.:'i_y "it:<. •7 .,1 ii'_. '1'. 't,F-. M, •�Y� •.i.,� �:.i1-i1} •'_ / L'7 1 n -. .. ,- .•f. r: �'+ s..ti' - .e): ..is-•- � •��•:•; -rJ _ Wit. •. r.(i' .i ".. - �. :. ••:1111 .' _ t - _• •... �:1'- �Y' ill: .3k.4�-... �.�� .:f.•+ ♦' ;.t�-. if�.S.•r. .) ':i"t�=� t+��_ .<i 1, rl -`l. .. :. .::It. ti 1'iY'1':i 1.'i-"•;'. AflD w9'.! i'•'ofI %:*a'p�• 1, ...+rv� 1 .`i7 t ti<:rw !�" -.t;I: `2JL"#/ : "'1�1..7-,f 1 •J" t_i12 'L�.,is � . j:" ?D. f �;. '�e' w�. k.ii y�l" *" t-`f: M �)" ••`.T*:x`d 1- 's s:�' "S .46 tO 4c"u1'Jf' ""IN ► A ••' i a !� 'fit. -.�.� l..777, 1 • • .'mil•::,. •: r; - •3 - J'1: ;•:� • YS F. • • '•;JI ��•�• F is =• • 6.w 71 lI - Gi'•:•^ •; ••s • 00:110 got- I1•J 0 r> 150 r Rx ill . '' AM WIDAMS 2- wry 1 ,..1992 C n a 4-0 vote - AGAC 12-"1 was t* the contained ined in the mode, resolution with FindiW 1, d82eted, Finding 3, modified; Cxditicn 9, modified and 0011dition 10, a€lded, to read as follow: Findings: 3) dhat the pylon with the sign is in keeping with tln � of the golf in the area. Cbrditionns: 9) Flans 1 and is based duop E� sign elevation revised ruaxy 10, 1992. February 10, 1992. L3ndsC'ape and irrigation plans, 2 sheets, dated February 10, 1992 and Xerisc ape cartific;ation, 4 Pam, dated January 23, 1992, accept as may be anended by the aarditions enumerated herein. 10 'he -14 ddambar trees are e=Waged to be replaced because of their invasive roots. Replacement trees shall be subject to staff review and approval. The dess<ripticn shall also be cad to read as follows: Of the Architectural and Site Approval C mdttee of the City of Cjpertino aR,Iin4 a sue, precise, landscaping plan, and the design and colors of a pylon at the entzance of an existing golf course. 2. DEGcation 4-AstQ-92 Monta Vista - Paquesting view and approval for a planned deve]. yt sign WxWm for an euistang office center. Located on the kftth side of Stevens Creek Boulevard Ebsterly and adjacent to the st r of Peninsula Avenue. Zt® Dillard reviewed tie staff comments noting the criteria set forth in the sign ordinance and stated that the particular site and sign did not meet those criteria. Staffs recommendation is for denial of the pied sign. Bob Slavik, Manta Vista Associates, explained the need for his tenants to have OTormum on Stemens Cheek Boulevard. He explained the problems with C31-'&am fearing and walls which are in place. He showed examples of other monuments signs in the Monta Vista area with multiple tenant names. Committee ASember Lavios explained that she felt the site does need a MUM* sign, but that eight (S) tenant names were to many. She suggested that the applicant provide more inforcation on the sign diagram and that the words Stevens Creek Boulevard does not reed to be on the sign and not repeat the address numbers. Omdttaee Member Weber agreed that the site needs a monument sign but that it should just have the center name, the address fi2Wxm and no tenant rmmm on the sign. He suggested that the sign can be shortened significantly to acoonmeodate this criteria. .. � ♦-i t?.?/." .w _ -=t9 r.•..=1 .�Ye .:. r_L..='e. r.''.,'� �:- -�.w:. r Z•;•f �... p. . 'tt�-�,! {q,.'?lt aP; �s:1..`..'3 r .:..I {I••.� V: � •: "f '• :.rJ p.�- -• _' d;r'll..t1 .. •1 •{. �r•1'-..I IT •), =i-' • 'd �� ma's.It-11 =-Il•.•' .. •::-i r:.• ".• .:•-a _ J. ... :• _ • - • �.N••! d:',. 7,•al is .•:•' < •FI - _• •`:[' - .. 1: �'.it it' - GIt ,.<. .._• '... :.._ ".• •- ...il. :S '.. ' -• .1� ,.-� .' >lll- •1 "3 = it .:^ •). � .._ il•.rf�11 � -- =:Ir•=t •:. �•; 1. •} �•S :•)i.. ; - - �•1- _{=- Gti� - .111:` _ •.. ._r ••'trn: - mil:._l_o !4t �:x" .1•.'•1 -• '•.:��•. l••) as • ,• .••1, •: :.i. .• • G• ^'•1 - � - IVY. +a:1: "f": .1�. • :?: at:A:-� *.F i?.e1 • .} i=:i. Ynr :s#, =T• �-r efm: - c:'n raa; :.;t '-s 1 ,- �•1t 11 - �Il � _ ll!1 '=- �/.� - 5.. -- M11��a::i � .�1 ' C•. ♦; .114.'r-.. •. i•aFf1:G "�:^ ., .• _♦ -++..- 'r,__ �i.4 •1..• _Y.:may .: � C,..,r.)':s •: ' _., .-• - . �� 1. a tits •_ A 11 1 at 1 � �y '.k `.?.:.�� ',•! '.1►� 't�- .tt` *J .�:al:: 07 f�' •/F'.>c d, -. • ^'9: 7,01 .r" .a O, a G1 •'.:-1 � _ram -'�_I ALI ni �.t� ��).._.i'�2 _ «..�#t.�t% .�'_i.,:�__ s!1l: Lr.t#a-.[S:1!�. �}. •mot r - _ �:•lflf - :-.'tires-_]. _ ,� 4 A� Page -2- PWMMrY 24, 1M TtU XSVIeWed the sWf this item been the with Am ncting Far the of the . O=dttee NWbW Lime4zessedW OMICOWns with the prcpaged 8JAP. CaNdttee Hember lavic® eMWessed with OW-Mn with Un quality of the color baa �be to AMC. 91 Minted. Wwtion,6 what Oa m ittee Member Jackson MWested minx' the bac�und of the tenant names for ease in changing tim tar n* names. *m,dttee tamer Basle 9uwtiaaed the orImtatian of the sign and vls'Creek k - NO SUgg&Jted that the B1vd. to inca the vi ity p�c� fir. ar toStevem Ommittee Nmbw Iavios suggested allowing the appliow* to c h apse which m' A best suit the center's need and place a matching side Panel on the otter side of the sign. a�ttee Mom' is fe prefers no tenv and a smaller sign and sugsted ding be added to the resolution far waiving the 200 ft l�. a. xuae arfter i . OmMittee HwbW Jackson questioned why the O mtmws East bound car West bma d or, Stems Creek Blvd.; or off Hig are �9 frcfrom.hway-85. AD: On a! 3-1 vote, with Omm ttee Imo° die dissenting, l �atian 4 A 2, was according to the fudis ags and mined in the model resolution with Finding 2 mad,Om aditim 9 modified, and oanditians 10 and 11 added to read as follms: Finding: 2. Due to the uniclue orientation and limited visibility of the building, the 200 ft. rule m i.teria is waived for this application Oonditicns: 9• The 4p0ral is basest upon Site Plan dated , February elevation �thibit OWsf apt as 2y trih1p39(2��xt� ii��ns emamarated . �.�+ a/A R6Lt�Vd L.7 10. The tenant name bad panel shall be raised in arder to allow easy rolacamit. 11. The backside of the panel shall be painted broom to mate the building. .y ''`'L.. !', .z. t '�:r`+- ..i:..li. IJ.a�i.i.'.''.•r "i.•. - TO •.1:- - .:y- -♦i .f:-`.- .I, is _ - - .. ei all 41, t _ - •T . __ ►•fig.= - - - u. . : 1" 6•:♦.' � ..•1"• • ... S:• '•.:-:11 ram.-M_ .. • • - �_.�.. �,,._k �: • 1 .,, ,w _: Il '��.r: "..}-'w C-1 "'. ♦.:�Bt': . ;,r ...:•P'w"0...T..• ♦ill-Ira-�.. � _ - .. •} 'i'.-it-I1. - �Il�a�=1 �� - � .- it-.. •:• _ -•.� _:• •I ... ti •` _:• - Dili• f-: v3. r - N'•: .,i:. / .1.J it ee 7 •.•f111 =- R.LP 1 y sell a` •t `• •, {1 it - • If.J •- � - _- • 'C•;' � 1Y).=# r•1 1 .- . .ice. •~ ,..♦-7I= • CI - 01 04 _c• 1 tlr Pl :•, y ` r• r •j •7 •.rY. -tll •)� _). _ o•.. •, _ - III, f r :r '4� kd1g )•�'e' Cr' « Y 11• -G:hlt •�. _T.. '••S'."^j' .b'4 " - - •.•A y` — •r-Y314. .- �.� :n}r-330• •3� - .i' •.,1•' fir, �l '.-3 �l :�' • _• ^ - . . mot+ �+= -►- • • •- �..a 1f _- =at•=a, _ ••1 •hk1= ••.. � va mil. f =• �:_ ••.11.=.l •.] � - •IS � ^ i• °'��; ':u,, "�.��,.-�. .'� �^,� "`tom �v �."' u • .z. F. 6•.11:.1i1 :ii w !;-It-:3.-_ 3' �T1 r�' •) .•� .1- -Y11i. • .� _ . - ;1:.,- -••I.....��.. .fit:•E.F F. ♦' _/. 11.•• ' .1. .� '�� ••ll"•1. •) '•a) ,all •) �- •}-� .•,�' i _ - _ - •a. = n 1 -` yr :a' •.` =1 . .h -- •^t- �.- '/ ..• _ =.n .:. I. `=• .. • Rom- -.c. ..)- • - age i4=.Jv ' tt••: I -_:• �-.' •.•:1.1=J-' •]. ..•.•S. .lil -'�I -1 G• ,•'1'• �-1:• - • .- 06 •' - • i rIF 11 ,It•»-7 G y - /• _•: -1 •: }. •ram:= s f. - +!�I 0 lilt Iwa, III of 1 41,.•'11'I Jil��1 JF - H }• - •j - ^4;. _-a _. .1,II� r/--= �•'•aA.;#,� .�;7, •.;:T...,. .1 •i —_'i .Ys l` At 10 1 �:•Il It =.At 4.=4r •) • •.' .:• ,•. — •f • — •. ..•^ — • Own 11 • • . • ♦l =• Am P -a- EW 94, 1992 CM that t J 8tat"d that use of thS IS vEty li;Rited andi with the y he sm� would appromed the r line I meted that she Cmuittee Member felt that the =kbwsdme was vat �Oatible with a GraeTc lmk in Cie but that it m neat be veay =ttfirale far here in �• On a 4-0 vote, A�licatiaei 1 .92, was cmtinued to the ve M 9, 1992 in car for the applicant to PmVide a clLawing and to Ccs ve i,der a different cmlar Scheme. 9• Nim*es of the regular meeting of I' ' 10, 1992. on a 3-0 vote the minutes were approved as sutmittred. Ommdttee fiber LiM reported that there was still several political advertisement signs cn De Area Blvd. Omoittee Member Lwios asked if staff mild bring the application for WOOamcks bads to ASAP on the MW& 9 meeting. amImittes Mm b?r Jackson a of hoes to regulate the In-ightness of signs. ccrxxM Om atittee Member Iavios expressed cwWSrn with the type of information an appl$catiort and the quality of exhibits. information explained to the Ommittee /t�hat�,. she has spoken with Planning C=ir loner FazeIm s regarding the Mir�aite :d which was sent to ASAC. It was d theCommittee Rembers of a proper method of am oaminic aticns between OCUMittee's and Cmnissiens. It was agreed that OmirPwscn H a would �k to �w Sor w—n It was also agreed a mig the abut them lade � red rS ar. mieAsAC �d speak to m yor sox�enr-en 00 mnittee Memb, Iavios spoke of improving the effectiveness of ASAC. CtWkittee Member Jackson expressed =1082m with neon signs and the best way to regulate them. She stag that they seem to be getting to be a problem thrOL34hout the city. Frank Strazzarino, duo Chaftw of CmVerce, addressed the C mmittee Megmbexs an the issue of new signs. ® NEWod+ Tbw Robillard OVIained to the C m mittee than rubs of the fcvdn Act in reTdrds to AW members attending a 1 for the of CmWCG regarding solution f� � He �]ained that the best lam. than two (2) ASAC meso attend the S W, • ' F es blMyi 24, 1M t M�s �4�16m1� - ths CIMittee that In repxft to the rW,,t :e r a ratio of hS MXW not be able to lack Irft that: Mtn • ZaBUYI b 001ai ed that a CWaElf Office did not iise any cif fc r t%n ft=B ®iSM within the tillage. 7he C=Ittee Mmime asked if it was qWrqglate far the Code Enforcement Officer to be signswithin time Center Mddi am not visible to the pt aic rf�trt-erg- , 71m E that there was no awtber Wdate than that was stated in the staff cmmmft. iI At 11:30 P.M• to the negtt raPlar to be held an Mil 9, 1992, 7:30 P.M•, Confewerm Deem at. PAMED BY: APPROVEDBY• itAiSms R.Planner —:2- - and Site AvprGvaL Camittee ATTEST City Clerk amended 3/24/92 asac/Min2--24 ly' 1. , 1.1 'f, v'}� ''1 �+z/1." lit.,. N/,'� •'':: y •--�•"/P � 1,. _'=.4s `11, t =� .•x^ 1:1" :`t�r.tf ' '' I�S:Nii(,".". '+.` S';i� ','wl L";?`.N- iI�!> 41 =3 V �-.r t'- 4•;.- {, V,T.{�: .��" 1'7 ,;y �,. ll)-•,s{ � • �,•», '+• ;�.':' •1�!alVilr` ,1:,''.1 J' -er.:l":,a;tCt''.at; ^.is •i' ;1. .��. :1 ii •,'S"lC '?'� 'U:i ♦ai a"d ii'.1. .• ✓� .I;a•'."+i.F. e.e7 . •.�L.- .:�5 is- '1..`/F:�/ `�.5v`,r��Jt�:. 1 ". I:`�)i ''✓:.•1L.. {Y i:rT ��v }"'" • ZZ ;r ter• �"'1_._ •�1 ..Ic*.:'�:�E�_ -7_L='. �.•ri-....>_._.. • .^,• ••i' lot-, _ ►" •Y •3 Mir .. •; 'i. I.�C�i: 1" '• •_.' 1 fib • - 7 r aT ,..•'- ry. i t ..:[• ►2 ;v •^ Yl: `-3._-'. ' • `•'l' If•r.' r.•, ' cl -1. • •(.. a.1 ••i -.IJl •d =�' •:It `ice� _: r - _:,�=• .' .. -.: s vi3'It::J' C •. • ... - - -.:x14 .:♦: •��. '. J 1 if •- •1 � _� Ilt•:•',t, •,- •' • •" I •r •G • � � �•. - p � Page -2- He quastialled the aim of the signs " Prcpartlagd to accqptabloe athe letbar . Ha that the trim and sign Hors awere y l® fa Sim Of be 28 Ommtttee HWher Wdxr qwstItzied the co1w.s of the past and the building. He stated that the propowd was acceptable. Caemtit tee VAsuber Rawls concern rAdt:h the co1ore of the building and stated that sly the bailding was fry standing, has its own are�titara] style, and the calms portrayed a Greek appearance, that the prqmmd was acceptable. Decision: On a 3-0 vote, ti,oee 10- 2 was approved according to the finding and caranditiera in the maul resolutions with �`3mUng 2 and iticn 10 modified of the l�rda$t l modification resolution and Cbnditien 10 added Mt.�c�+�ay-.t the sign solution to read as fellmss: `y.es..- r aaM= 2) 7hat the wed blue trim is fitting f(W the et MW character of the Greek Restaurant. CCNDIsl= 10) The building parapet calm shall match the body color of the building. SIM HOWN QH: aQI+IDI` MM: 10) 'the sign lettering shall be 13" high and spaced Pmpirticnally. MR : Item 4, 5 and 6 were continued to the end of the agenda due to the applicants not bed present. 2. Amliotican Sr , ijdway Sjqn _ Axpe tirIg review and apgarsoval to modify a Planned Development Sign program for an existing stxaiM center. The site is located at the Southwest .r of Stevens Creek Blvd. and De Anza Blvd. T W ,Illard reviewed the staff camments nOtlntg that the two neon window signs do meet the 25% coverage requirement. Gary Anderson, Midway Signs, reviewed staff cents and arwmared questions Of the OM mfttee Mmlbers. He stated that the neon signs are not readable and scarcley visible ftm Stevens Creek Blvd.. ' HnVh t 9, FaP s3.. like the Mean sue. He stated I I . signs awe bemvkqaver peeoli4 t+ed In 00 City. Va stated the Signs t�L1i►�ab,,.@a Lim wei ftm . yyam,,.,,,, dam tastaftUy and that he dram m* h3 a pmWm with the ptcpasal. He Stated the sigm we rot readily VISIble from Stevens C3 c JUVd. He Suggested. a Minn to remme the window decals so as to redze the amount. of sigzap in the w:Lidma. He expressed oono= that ASAC approval was an a from installing the signs. If MW were reviawed earlier by AM they would harms bed approved for smaller signs. Cbaait p Hmcsie stated t$tess s�.,Ww are fairly abusive. He stated that ASAtC has a&MVved neon window sus befcre but they were aaxb smalier. He offered a cw&atmise which would be to cellar one of the roan signs in the window. He stared that if this aplolioation was presented to A= prior to it being installed, AM may have allwaved nwh smaller neon signs. Mr. Andersm suggested removing the signs and replacing them with teller neon signs brirging the total ax a dom to tely 20%. CSialil W : - Hoxsie re�t1 9Hd cM*4rRLtM the item with the direction that the appli rye the amount of sup square footage. Decision: On a 3-0 vote Application 8-AMC-92 was continued to the meeting of Vardi 23, 1992. On a 3-0 vote Appliea1 11-SAC-92, 12-ASAC-92, and ASAC 36-U-86 were all continued to the meeting of March 23, 1992 date to the applicants not being ANOWL 9E 7. 7he minutes of Fury 24, 1992, were oontinued to the meeting Of March 23, 1992 dais to a quorum for approval of the minutes not being presem. 8. On a 3-0 vots, the minutes Of the regular meeting of January 27, 1092 were approved as submitted. Ooamittes Member Ism expressed cavern with politiL-41 signs on North De Anza Blvd. left Ove fr m the last elections. He asked staff to look into whether a new tenant nam an the building on N. De Anza conformed with sign Ordinance. Committee Member weber expressed concern regarding neon signs throughout the city. He stated that scmeUung needs to be dome regarding this over proliferation Of neon, signs. Oarmittee Nor Lim asked staff to look into an enforcement Of all the billboard signs, such as Cart Show, and U.S.R./China Games, etc., that are ® posted taut the city. a I . • _ :-€. a ,.{ m:— _ OF&M i 11 X.. Y.. -.5,sl�z ..-.trli .sJ571'• FJ ! .1 )I ' 1y��__.-_--�— 'F�'r83 1 0. e •, " • U��µ1..:; L:t. i.l! �.y: 1 w v bh.n,". 1'e' .C 1ll 41 At i r; i 1,i 1' .,t�•:1.. i,'-1a':�"" r. .: •.i 1 =s. •� .a . 1�.'1'I it` _ ,1 . _I.:r1 •: .a oil GO Wil emu. ..ti •♦; ' � _� � - ••II=._ _ mot_,. .. �' - .•i�__J ♦Ir IP.7 1 III J �I :It•� . ,.. },.,. ..2 4n , f 8Mirth 23' 092 PagD -2- Camittee member Jbcksm stated that do would not apm to anymme than • am additicral sign, either the E�.lrlim sign or the sign but not both. emnittes Yienber Weber eqzessed concernthat the amw willreturnIn the fubim with a request far a morament sign and that if a secand building mmaat®d sign is approved far the site, and a mamment sign is approved in the future, there would be an avr of sue. Ile eitated that he would not vote far approval for a send building mounted spa. cmm4oittee FAmber Lavias agreed with amn ttee VAnber Weber and questiarvsd the owneas intent for the mmment sign. Chairperson HmaMa stated 'chat a ma-mment sign will overwhelm the site and that a se=d building mm&cec3 sign is ,one: iate. committee Vawaxw Weber reiterated that a seom%d building mom sign is not a1 r.priate. Cimanittee Y"*ers and the applicant discussed different lities for sign a for ale, site. tbmittee W-unber Jadso'1 stated she would approve the building mid signs but no mmmoent sigh. Me sLvjgested rescinding the sign which web approved previously. 7he c%vinittee members agreed. of a 3-1 vote, with Cmmittes Ylember Weber dissenting, Applicatiari 11-AMC-92 was approved according to the findings and cotiiticris a mtained in the model resoluticaa with Finding 2 and ccmditions 10 and 31 added to r ea das follows: �a 2. 7hat approving a mmmment sign will make the center sign program inconsistent with Title 17 of the Oqpertino Mzicipal code, further, the builditkj has adequate visibility from both De An--a Blvd. and Homestead lid. QMftLti lo. 'iris resolution makes null and void the met sign approval in Application ASAC 51,820.2. 11. The building letters on the Homestead side of the building shall be a mwdml of. 12" high. u x r rN Page 3- 23, 1N2 Stevens4. Blvd, MW=Juftly, 120 fPt. But Of Swdley Qeive. the � t that staff h� with with a plan9�te t t exte wly in the pat t� and omma up Can be Zeoor ed ateapproml. He ligRtInW aran d a A'ti+t machine as PIZIancial r-TliredState Code a� the t Pes and size Of gi ,M being Omlmittee Mmber twins owessed owicernwith the appeatancet of the two new f after d$ atssion with the aFPli r�tt. 0= tree . Iaivios agIme , that r1m plan was 0=dtt ee Mmber Jadmm stag she mWwts the applicatian because of the increased safety and that no glare will be seen on Stevow Creek Blvd. Cogmittee Member Weber e2qpressed cKsloem wj* 1 the height of the poles stating t they dMild be lower and in Order to cmpmsate for the lower may be added. OlairPmmm Hwis factorsff l ie stated that in c�.sicie ati� of the site and limitingicfi*JM fixtures that he would approve the WAicaticn. pgwgim: III a 3-1 vote, with Cctuittes r Weber 12-ASA 92 CeP1e s , AM.$Caticn in the .a l resolutic n. the Fiatdings and aatditiom contained 5. 36-U-86 - app va`1 for a handicapped parking y for an reviewstIM and building. 918 sii a is located at the Southeast corner of Stevens Gbeek Blvd. and Tcmre Avenue. Tbm Robillard reviewed the staff ocrMents noting that the cry o tAw two handier pwking stalls is requfrW in order to the of t� 24 of the Uniform Building Code. He stated that the appearance of canopy will match that of the office building. Than Hermt3 Architects, reviewed the staff its and ansmred questions of the Committee Members. Committee Member Weber used no concerns for the Proposal. 00amnittee Member Jadcsoat e4ressed om'cern for the planted and with the type of IM-193tion. types of plants to be I+ 21s log Pago -4- ttM VAubw lavics aggested reqdrbq a condition fdr aWxaml for • PlantIng and Irrigation. She equissed cmzwn that no =Ior surles were availablP for the pal. It van OVIained that the roof mid colors dNould match that of the office building. oereolaHMISie stated that the strunhze shad lack lidce the office building rather than adjacentrtQikxdrdunits. s On a 4-0 vote, liaa ara ASAC 36-U-86 was appvved a=mdiyq to the findings and conditions contained in the model rewILUm with Findling 2 modified and Cotdit.ions 10 and 11 added to read as follows: 2. That the cwxPY colors and ma!'13rW f4 match the adJacent office building. 10. Both side planter areas shall be irrigated and maintains regularly. Each planter shall be planted with llOn star jasmine vines. 11. 2he oolcrs and mils of the canopy shall match the adjacent office building. HISP s lL 6. A licatiaar 10-ANAL!9. Yiassa4's - Raquest.,ingf review and approval for as planned d�eg�nellgzent.�sign g ;=gram for ,�,a,�n..exfs�tinsj restta�yuyrmt^ located an the East side o De Anna Blvd. q F m & te1Y 2SO f. Nbr Gil o Balling Rd. Tom Robillard reviewed the staff c onimmt•s rx ting that the site does not meat the 200 ft. rule criteria for mm ment signs utd ch is the reason for .�: - -n ung denial. Roula and George saris reviewed the staff comments and answered questicm of the amittee VAnbws. They a pLuned that the Taco Bell rest,virant previously had a mm nent sick of the same size and that they were simply moving it to a different location. Committee fiber Jackson enwessed cmxwn with the colors and materials and that there were no solar draw-L-irgs or material samples to look at in axder to make a decision. Om m lttee Member Iavius expressed the Sam cmx=n that she dial not have end information to make a decision on the colors. Pag MOM 23 j, the ant sign was qp1proptimte for the location, and •• so,, wand require a c entinca m In arder for the applicant to drag bwk color samples and a color drawing. ClOmmittee Member Jackson stated that she felt the sign makes good sew in the location and would approve the maimment sign. Committee Ylember W-ber stated that he cannot agree with the motament sign. Be stated that the site is to short for a mmrument sign and would corm an over proliferation of maimment signs an De Anza Blvd. He stated that the building sign is visible from both dir�..fans. Committee Member Iavias stated that she is leaning in favor of the morwimt sign. W. Isagaris explained in more detail the location of the moment sign. Committee Member die explained to Mt. his that ASAC rxw has the oio�awbndty to bring the site up to conformance with the sib ordinance. Be stated that the site is too sea]1 and that approving a met sign would set a precederoet for breaking the 200 ft. rule criteria. oomittes Member Iavics agreed with Omrinittee Member Hm sie. A motion for denial was not passed by the committee mom. The Cmmittee Members discussed that a monuneart sign for the site would not be approjiate but that an addition to the building mounted sign explaining the type of res�aurant would be more a;Frogriate. ASAC agreed teat a sign on the side of the building may not be reoona�tded but should be in:luded on the building sign as previously ate. gecirian• On a 4-0 vote, Application 10-AW -92 was cm*Inued to the meeting of April 13, 1992. 7. &Tlicatian 14-AgG 2 The Driving Maditne - RequesLujg review and approval for an extortion to the sign ordinance for an existing building located in a light industrial zone. The site is located on the East side of Bubb Fed. appradmtely 300 ft. South of Stevens Creek Blvd. Tom Robillard reviewed the staff gents noting that the site is located in a conventional MG zone. The pr+rposal is for a sign exception to grant approval of a morrmmimt sign for a site which is ap% vxinately 20 ft. short of meeting the 200 ft. rule criteria. Rwther, the applicant is reciussttng approval of a freeway oriented sign. Mr. Rabillard explained the criteria for ASAC approving a freeway oriented sign. G<, v z' /+�ma�'tirCs 23, INIMM Jars ! She Diving may@, rsviOmd thB staff cmmft and answered westims of the mmdttae mmftm. Chairperson , 4jusstiaeaed the size of the sign. After a brief dimmmi n it ms aWeed that the sign shcu dmtChthat of the Apple bj sigrOWWLchare 5' 86" hick by 45" w3cde. "I"ImIttee Mwler I,m4m stat®d that the site is close to meeting the 200 ft. rule criteria and that the Wilding signs are limited and maw and the mmmment sign is a good design. Omiaitt"m JadM m stated that she MWarts the bemm "t � , e design ty and is need for visiwutty. � Cmuittee Aber Webw stated he OWOrts the montnaent sign but d not support a cried sign. He stated that ASAC should be aamistent with grenous menials for freeway oriented signs sft as the IP station on EbMestead and highway 85. ClairPersOn Hmmie statted that the M=ment sign Is very wire, clean not and of 9 He stated that two aadit$a ,l building signs mwe a sign. as ASACsas already for the Mtet &,scussicn the a O=Ittee Mmftm agreed that they mild M=w the moa'naneat sign and Nurth facing Wilding sign but would =ftinm d sion of the East facing freeway oriented sign until the next meeting. Decsi_ghs On a 4-0 vote, Application 14-ASkC-92 was approved a=xding to the firdings and it.i(mss om*aimed in the model resolution with F�imUngs 1 and 2 deleted and a new, Finding, 1 added and Concditicnr 10, it road 12 added to read as follows: Fib 1. Mat the mmment sign is needed for better site visibility and is compatible with other signs in the area. For these reasons ASAC has WNW the 200 ft. rule require m*. 9onditim 10. The me mment sign shall be a maxim m of 5' We hig h by 45" snide. 11. Zhe mwnmmnt.. sign shall be located outside the sidewalk site triangle as depicted an 04xrtim Standard Detail 7-6. 12, the dust facing building sign is not approved as pit of this application and is eantimied to the next meeting of April 13, 1992. M 23, 1992 Page 7- MINUM S. On a 2-0 vote, the minubas of the regulew meeting of March 9, 1992 were aid as spitted. 9. On a 3-0 `rote, the Washes of Feftuary 24th were with the foLlwingrrodifiatfan: Item 3, secu d Paragraph - Ocmoittee Mm bw Jackson stated that able, would abstain from discussicn of this item duce to conflict of interest. mattes YAWber Jackson asked staff to look into an 4 Uepl sign for Sys Liquors at the camw of Homestead and Blaney. 91he discussed the issue of nem signs throughout the city and suggested that the other camuttse members lac at ctter cities and see that they also have a grcblem with an over proliferaticn of neon signs. Cmuittee asked staff to find coat what other cities do abut nem signs. Ommittee Ymdmr Weber asked staff to rg9aae the neon lights in OwXere m Ron A tG true color lights. He asked staff to look into the sign at An-jan Feed store. He also asked staff to Look into ompliance with the sign: cue for billboard signs throu0jout the city. 7he Conamittee Members then discussed aendizing the sign cridumme an the next ASAc agenda in oast to discs a work plan, scope of work, and to sat goaas for the sign ordinance. RE Wvw- COW S1PP Staff updated the Committee Members on code aroement actions. b Ttm Robillard stated that: there was no further update from the last aeetmV. k =...> �.'.2� � Men.,'..-. +'S` �i? x� F•'k � '.h...i." £ _ U s r.. �q 1 IC Cm or ,"s. w 2600 '1 Ate, CMWMW, SSA (408) 252-4505 CW 'Yf1E ==M nam CW 3 '8Y dl AND SEM AFFF4 TAL OMMM OF SM MY OF CM S EM APn 13, 1992, HMV= MD = GMEMM MM A. CI't9l Ems, AT 10300 == Ate, emmaw OWUM 7he meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.1L by *Wxpe am Kwole. NaL Members Present: Hmmie, Lim, Jet, der, Lav'ics Members Absent: None Staff Present: Thomas Robillard, Platter 11 1 W WE AGOM OEM 2. Agtplicatiari 9- 4C:g2 -ac3eiro - Est om*imanoe toe meetingym- of Aptril 27, 1992. of a 5-0 'vote the applicatImi was om*Jraaed per the appllmnts request. Aw Nomm ammil - Neute. BAR[Jti � � 1. Apg► 1-4J-92 Jack iD the - l equest$Tq early revue of Use lFexmit for a freestanding fast-food restaurant, at the nest cam' of Ste mns Coaeek Etivd. and Saicd;i Way. Cc u mittree Newber Jam stated she would abstain from caLventing eat this appliemeticn due to a conflict: of inter. James Jae7man, a+e;rr ese:tting the applicant, introduced the prqjec:tt to the puttee Members atditessing staff coatoetts and the changes W h have taken place. Ttm RdAllard reviewed the staff ommwts noting staffs concern with the land .ir q, arc hitecturet, and signacle. He reiterated sane of ASAC's conoerns from the previous "early review". lastly, 11r. Rnbill ar d cent:;cued that he would transmit t ASAC's caments to t-w Planning Ccmaissicn as scan as ASAC is finished. Walt Goodseal, eject architect, rreviet ted time scope of the project and described the architeabitral style. He patted several sketches which portrayed different architecttra]. style. He stated the Foodtmher is more than wzllizxj to wark with the City in order to develop an arc titecbtaral style which is acineptable and they are root held to any particular style. He also anst+m-ed questfemm of the Committee Members. sov j44y n # y 149 $58 8 & gbggfi � 9 • O � Apie'l 13, 1992 3- Gary Anderson, midway Ste, reviewed the staff CoamentS and ardMered s t3oss of the cxumittee Members. He Stated that the n8M sign had been swiped around and calculated to cover less than 17% of the window . oasmittee Member ia'svics stated that the neon sus still to stake the store front appear may. Committee der Lim stated that the proposal was aCCRAable with the aunt of signage. O=ittee Member Jackson stated that until a clear policy on dealing with neon signs .is formulated, she would approve the neon signs. committee member Weter stated there was shill too =xh neon sigrage in the windows. Be stated that it is obtrusive and visible from Stevens Creek Blvd. Cha.,xperson Hcxs e stag the signs are very amble but that iLs "deli" siS., is better looking than the "Baked goods" sign. He stnt d the "moo and (Veal" supw are too =xh and too bright for the window. As a Ozqxomise he would reoom and approval if the " sign was remuved leaviszg just the Mali" sign and the "oper-i" sign. Committee Member IAm moved to approve the al n with the, additional condition to move the red bordw around the °'G esso" sign and to move the "opens" signs to the same side as ttse "Deli" signs. on a 2-3 vote, the notion was not approved. on a 3-2 vote, with CM=ittee Members Jadtsarn and TAvics desc entiYng, Application 8 ASAC-92 was approved aocording to the findhrw and conditions curtained in the -* del resolution with Finding 2 deleted, aonditi,'<,-. 3 modified, and Ccndi cion 10 added to read as follows: 9. The approval is based upon. site plarss and pho dated April 13, 1992, except as may be aamendW by the conditions amm rated herein- 10. The "Bqpressd' sign is not approved as part of this application. 4. Am)1 oatian 10-ASAC-92 xiassoo's Restauxa t - Requesting reviewand approval for a planned developmOnt sign Program for an Odsting rerstasrar-t located on the Fast side of De Anza Blvd. tely 250 ft. North of Bollingw Rid. Mom Robillard reviewed the staff comments noting that the direction from ASAC, from the previous meeting, was for the applicant to =v.1der adding the words "Greets: Specialties" underneath the building mounted sign. . t ASi4C4Wil, 23, $992 Page -4- Geoff Tsagaris stated that he felt it was not fadr not to l+et him have a monment sign. He stated that he needs a montment sign to iklent4fy the site w�a�nyd� the he is selling and to tell who they are and what they Sen. Ommittee Member Jades suppcwts the wilding mmxdmd signs only with the words, "Greek Slaecialtie8" on the windows instead. Ommittee MmWxw Lnins agreed with Ccomittes VAmber JWkson. Om mittes Mwbw Lim agreed that the vends Specialties" should be aid on the building. Cmuittes Membw WJ= stated that the building colors, Ummlves, make the building very visible. In addition, the site does not meet the 200 ft. rule criteria for building mow*,ed signs. Cmnittee Member Lim stated that there are many sestaa�cats in ®qmn-tim which do riot have motment. signs, such as, Marie CIalerubms, C=utons, and Flontana Is. Ommittee Member Jacksm stated that the building calms act Ulm a sign. necisiog: On a 5-0 vote - ApplicaI 10-A.SAC-92 was denied according to the findings contained in the model resolution. On a 5-0 vote, the Oaanittee VAmg=s continued Item 8, ASAC 3-"2 (Modified) to the meeting of April 27, 1992 due to the hen of the evening and the nnmiaer of items on the tea. 5. AMjjc_jtian 147ASAC-92 The ®r jV jW - Pagv9sting review and approval for a freeway oriented sign for an Ming building located in a light industrial zone. The site is located on the &nst side of Bubb Rd. approximately 300 ft. South of Stevens Creek Blvd. Tbm Dillard reviewed the staff cmments rusting the direction from ASAC from the last meeting. Jim Fame, The Driving Macioce, submitted plums of the site with a mock-up of the sign placed on the building. W, also presented ya video tape shoring the views from Stevens Creek Blvd. and the 85 may. Ommittee Member Weber felt that approving the additional sign on the East elevation would cause an over proliferation of signs. t ASACAWMM ApdI 13v 1992 Page -5- Ctmmitte s Neubw Lim state he would not sqVOrL the wing Sigu Cn tris East aawtim. 'The m==Mt sign ors Bubb rd., the sign en the Narth elevation and ite, clear visibility an Stems Creek Blvd., ace m=+e than sufficient. C�aitt eeyAubw Iavics stated she does not have a prcblm V`:h approving trw East ele%wtian sue, but sbe is not convinced of the nod fog it. C itt�ee yie= jadcsm m4Vorts the sign. Me stated that the b bluing need visibility at Fly 85 and stsvew trek Blvd. I MtIM because of lu ted view of the sign fr m Stevens, Creek Blvd. Ommnittee stated that he feat the building has ena and visibility is adequate. e a s On a 3-2 vote, with COWittee Jackson and havics desoenti ng, d4 li cation 14 Ash-c-92 was cried according to the foUnwing findings: 1. That the nature of the business dkx . spot require ftmeway criented Ste• 2. 7hat the building sign an the North el,e vtian maw the visibility and identification needs of the applic Mt. Pffi^thar that the Fruposed East eleva`aicn sign is not r-xUly visible fnA StevensCreek Blvd. and Freeway 85 making the sib xMBOSSISMY. S—So 6. Alioa 7b CMcw - requesting u t �r review and ap=wml to modify the Wilding oole s and sign for an existing restaurant located at the southeast carver of Stevens Omk Blvd- and Portal Ave. Tom imbillard reviewed the staff comments rooting that the scope of the a�pplicatiaai was to repaint the restaurant and modify the sign proga m- Earen Lejman, restaurant Ent. eroW, reviewed the staff comments and answered questions of the Cumitteeet Members. 7he Ctumittee Members discussed concerns regarding the repair of the siding on the Fast side of the building which was in poor repair. Cxmmittee Members Lim and Lavios stated that the application was acceptable. Cx�amittse Member Lavios added thc,t`, the white badaground an the sign should be clanged to an off-%bite or ivory. a ` st y.,r.." page -6- 13, 1902 cmdtbee NeWbW Jackson agrwd. C21331 felt the app tiaan wet$ acceptable of sign %" notpart is ,v20, of th app"cation. ma OzJgesbEld that the sign Should be of a ., sj;. rthe findings and t r. 'ed inwamodasUng, to FInatng 11 and �nait 9 erne 1® theWWIr and OmAtion 11 a*W to the toreso as f®alms on MzCV1. a �tim to a dev 1' 7hat � sign ,a as aonclitfaned hw�+ain, is consistent with Title 17 of Code. izMAEMM 9• 1992 tas is based � sign Crs`erf a dated 24, may be MMXW by the Conditions emumvftad bmdn 10. Ttne �he a na color for both the buildin? and d sign s1iall match vat 2148. 11. Option "2" of sign "B" on the edLtbit is riot aMlicaticn. as of this Model resolution vWom ceding aFFrOval of a modification to the building colors was amendedto add condition 11 to rmd as f®llowss gm t 11. MW hd1dings wood siding shall be repaired and treated as 7• nol]iCatio �6�2 Ad 74r� �i,r,.aQ o ti ng and gyp.. Inc an extericr neon building sign � r� located Vall00 FBshic�n Pads. The center is located at the nit . of Stevens C��t Blvd. and Wolfe Road. Tba Robillarci reviewed the staff coa ments rx*JM staff Is Omxmn with the sign and remmueme1ed denial. Scott Prop�l�the described the b leading to the sign Restatarait. George Britt, Ad Art Signs, explain the signconstruction. Peter Jcrdca answered questions of the Ommitte e Members. ® Cmmittee Member Jacacson aqoressed wirndo►a►• signs. cornaem with the brightness of the neon ,fn ,tV AS�1C 130 1 Paget 7- - C m aittee Menber : gym stated he was Wt =Mkl ad that thO WLga will hav the restaurant, be-,use sales and the number of p3cple In VaUm IS U w and the variety of food, types, in the fad =Rz t, a&b to the M Es of the stated that the is a to the Probim center. oommittee Member Ueber stated that VxDonalds is highly visible t= WOl f1a p,oad. Ha suggested a smaller direct3azi sign may be accede but a neon sign is too much. Committee VAnber Lavics agreed with Cmz itter, sma)er Um stating that the sign is not the solution and may end tqp bating tla cmter m wo than helping- In o�,�,,,,.�,,, to Ct�a xper�s�� ie's aeon# r not a notWit' Of the ,.on golden n Otf.6dies, Mrs RdAllard respMxW that they won Hamie agreed with Committee Member Lim that awing the nem sign would be the wrong direction for ASAC to follow since the ,majority of the Ctumittee Members agree that region signs at the mall are not acceptable. Chai4 Iimmie, and 0anmittee Metes Lim and Weber agreed that t2 a non- mall. ill�sm .�ted sign or r, attached to the post acing .trancet, would be an accieptable soluts.+ots to Maids problem. Decision: Chi a 5-0 vote, with from tt� applicant, AM' 't"'d this item to an ,, date in �' for the applicant to d�+elc:p a n�trT sign program for the oenfi r. slow R *IIA+i 9. Ilt tlo9n 81 004 7n Sign - Discussion of pL—'kimiraaay work pi cis, goals and objectives. Hobillard discussed tr~ different options relating to timing for ASAC review. He stated twatASACneeds to start their meetings at 7:00 P.M. as ' by the gUnic..V j, Code, If AW wants to change it to 7:30 P.M. then an Oteinance need:, to be approved by the City oaancil. He stated that if ASAC wants to farm z 1 sub-committee bin I-SACr Chaidber of CCII'C8 and soma other possibl:a partieiPants that it would be aamptabla to staff as lrmg as the meetings were held during normal business hours. John statton, Cupertino chamber of Commerce, discussed the 0,nbers direction for the sign ordinance and suggested a special committee with ASAC, almber, staff, .ud otters to be determined- It was discussed among the Qammittee Members the advantages of having a sub-caamittes. It war- agreed that a Minute Comer should be bit back to ASAC at th3 neoet meeting ruing City l'.01 roil to appoint a sub-Ccmmittee for review of the sign ordinance. l►- r:.e : f. ",III• — r ..ytr r Del 0 b - �-1 it�_.. � .�, �.Y _ • ��` 71. wl Q . _ - y'•{'I' '3 1L:: ••/4d>"7 'i:'s- sr�- .:,�,.y -<':Y:O•. ...:1 ..1-' ;.�"y:` 33�- If. 1 i1� .ot" 7� f� '3JC1`, �' :'1w.;1(YO`_'. !i< L.J" 'is_:fjiY3'a•. ad' . (> ^i� "..,•:-Y-. ♦.i.;-, i11.�.�y:;�;, FI" L,G: mifJ� .9a,. O'49..:-�.,1 1 a, �"s�• Y'il'H :4-�: ",};7s i r` c.rx Y"�r #a.:at'' ,a,•,.. M�`. " '.7,t.. e,9 ./-:.-1 i f;:•�-t= �, j1:p- Rtir:.yi,"� l -� v' 'Y •`�'J1<. ,f. 1_Yi�a.ii.x,l.E':'l>r: 1 .1,. L-,.1��.iL. /. (;Y: C�'i-i� • a��►._`.� C - - -it il'•• •p• - .;t •1 •• .:ul is ..,•_� .�.•.. �.•>#_ -- Ir- _ �. • '...._�.. •'.•1 : `a till 1 c r',- j :1 ♦ c !.•-t1.11 -- �,:aIL•-�I - 11. .. •�❑1-'. 3 •►J �- r �,.•_ - .t` IMP d C/ 1 27, 2992 Page 2- 4. implicationTeresa Ommledm - Ra*z sting sedw w dt appraval for yennmt 1r door dWplays at of Stevems g n oditfrq�.��s.�m�*�d. and Do mow Blvd.bq c .. slits is located at t2m Soutbwwt corner`cm,,�aAWAl3zard the staff a39d of the OMM dt . Tevm �go�aVleibied that she was unable to make =ntaft with the company, Fi bersta s, who mWwthe fiber' ► ropes. Om m$ttee Member Lin felt the display was acceptable. Cionittee Meter cmwern with the clew badJtgrnund. She stated that a peram does see the bad even though it is clear but would generally agree with Cumittee Mcdber Lim. Omwittee Member states tl ' she would vote against the primal. She does rat see the need for addittml displays wd that the store already has + • committee Member Weber stated he does not li1m this type of display and expressed concemns that it would look like the neon displays, in the McDmuilds Restaurant. Ommdttee Mir Hmmi e felt unoaofo rtable with c ombing the app]ication because of possible obtrznsion. He stated that he was not convinced for the weed of the sign and that it world not be obtrusive. It was suggested to the applicant that the proposal either could be cm*bwed or denied. Ms. stated that she would rather have it eontizuzed in order to explore tl%e fiber optic ropes. CmzAttee Member LwIm offered to help Ms. combiro in contacting FUxwstass. On a 5-0 vote - A licatian 9--ASAC-2 was continued to the meeting of May 11, 1992. I�1 : FUFML REiTM S. Applicatiara 19-ASAP42 E.J. Imm Assoaj@&ffi - Requesting review and approval for architecb2 ral, colors, and modifications for an existing church located on the North side of Bollinger Rd. approximately 680 ft. Wear of Blaney Ave. Y Dap -3- #, L32 tie staff CQ=Mft notAny his with the hUffi presstwe sSodf n fhftays and aMesbed that the irrigation pUm be by staff one it in damigred. NUB Horton, E.J. 10jum Associatm, xvviewed the staff cumda and answered questioris of the Ommdtbee Newbers. OMMittar< Member Lavics, Jackson, Wter, .Lain and H=sie found the Fmposal acceptable. Deoi.si : on a 5-0 vote - 19-AWC-92 was appvowd according to the findings and conditions in the made] mesoLution. 6. Apglicatioaa 20nASD -92 Oalifoa s3n*+ - Pequesting review and approval to modify the colors of a planned sign proWm for an existing restmzant located at the Northwest oommer of De Anna Blvd. and MoCIsllan Rd. Tom Dnbillard reviewed the staff marts noting the scope of thePrWasal. Demitri, Rendev� (life, Wlained that the P above the door would be all ]black with no stripes. Jay Dyer, California Sign Co., eMlafned the caollos and the design comept behind the sign pram. ® Ommittee Member Jaen had no ins with the proposal. with the wwthering of -�he vinyl lettering on the sign. Cao mittee Member LWdos stMasted adding the address nu*ers oat the =mzent sign. C7rrmittee Member H ramie eqzessed cairn w°ath the briers of the sign d►e to its existing height and size. Committee Memo Jackson asked the applicant to reconsider the palm trees and gold trim craps on the alien stating that in the past palm trews have not been an acceptable design for moubers of the coo muni ty. Dion: On a 5-0 vote - Application 20-ASAC-92 regarding the sign dam was approved according to the findings and om ditior:a stained in the model resolution with Condition 1G and it added to read as follow: cmditions 10. 3he applicant shall add the mabers on the mataa<imment sign, 11. Zhe green palm trees on the signs arr riot awed as part of this ® application. .. - a v :�.Itt •-f.l ..•s•7 •�-1.. •:i• •: •.1 - ••llll Gli`•'C1 7,� _}-/•k _ '-.Ca ••, s-'�!: - > r. : •1•.._ �..- - _ i1 .1•• ram_ _ .<: . .. a _la• FT ti➢7 �' ••`..ti. •.C.1 ...,••'' ..• <; �. ... -s 1. ♦•'II IC -- Cal•�� •:: >-�• _• -�,•lf'�Cr` �•.11'.11 -- `il'i•.=f �..Ca•:� -;•i. =�• �:•tlil i.. - =�I1•=f ,.•y:c - �1 •" • ems; •. •` ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE MINUTES 2 of 3 1992 & 1993 AMU "' M 8. DisMMSiM a goals and directions for a< Sign tb8s. 'xm Rcbillard presented the Viaaxte Order and Wised the of the . 7he G=itt s I�Y,aabws then, disoussed tho mwbership of the Sign ttteey and consIdered� the may, ty of having members��of,�tthey publiOf c large, be on the 9� L • it uns ^ Instead mmbers of the �� an the ttee that the ttes should hold at least on® public is sessimr.. Alm, M%s-, will hold Public r+evie ang the prelimirwrY Sign on a 5-0 vote - Mve date C?r+sub-�ttee was approved � the findings and she ofttee cmtained in the draft MiTute Order with the following ications: ZOOM i. giat the sub-co®nittes will be beneficial to the resident cmMmity. 2. - fry and kusiaass cmmmity will be beneficial to the sub-ommit-tee, and AS,O in reviewiM the Sign Ordinarce changes. ggM Of 9A,<kmmdttee 1. The voting membecd4 of the Mb-0=ittee stall om*rise of... 3. The Snb-Cmuttea shall hold one public input session in -Aden to gain direction and insight from the public for the sign arditanve d angel By cis of all ASAC mks, C=ittee Member Hm sie and Committee Member Lim were d=n to be the ASAC rqz es., tatives on the signSub-committee. The Ommittaie Members discussed possible gmls and objectives for items which need to be reviewed by the sign arsdinanoe ittse. Items z ed for discussion are as follows: * issue of enforcement of noaT cmxforming signs * the definition of signs to add illuminated or new signs • impact of interior signs that are dire..ted tamft streets • ivaaact of window signs Ff-,'`1 A Jr3' a k �li Yx � 5 :91,r 2992 timing of sign qwLvvals• � wall the review J�nvcess signs versus belojht of signs MICS the Mtdnance UN , Cam, * pre 2b]a and easy to read bir agglamts iad panic swbmit tat crilEria * Ysigns, per, and bmwrs dirseotion for the ardirgam to be mare tnnifewmadi tbwou0mat the City ratbrx ided Into distidcts anew the than anzaval of mayor sign dhanges Overall goal of sign aerdinanoe is to adequately identify businesses so as to be successful without degrading the aestheLIc appearance of the city. CW 9. The mir� of the regular meeting of April 13, 2992 were app road with the following modlificat im Page 5, Item 6, fourth paragraph, replace C mdttee Member Webw enzessed, with, Ihe Committee Membeur z discussed. Page 7, add, after the third parawaph, In response to Clranirpersorn die'6 question of the legality of the nee golden ashes sign, Mr. &JAllard reqxrded that they were not legal.. Oa mittee Member vwxw eotpressed c anoezn regarding the number of mean sires in the new liquor store on Bk. d Road and De Anza Blvd. Committee Member Iavias asked staff to have applic wets pent colored mac copies and/or provide specific color chip exanples for all Cwmittee Members. Committee Member Bain asked staff to look into the weed Pint along Parlett Place and Basaneo Drive. Chairperson Hcoole asked staff to look into plarntirrg the vines which were required to be planted on the McClellan wall. ChanVerson Huxsie also stated that he has been with meeting with the Mayor to dismiss the items as previously requested. ' OF Tm Rabillard stated that Yiassco°s Pastaurarnt had appealed the ASAC decision and is s&A&Iled for the City omnail meeting of May 4, 1992. Itu Webw stated that he would attend the meeting and a-rower questions as required- +r. k � .�� l.j.�y a-� a'� -_ .i ask...♦ .,t t- - ►It •i -r- - AN Js r u, a CAr91 ®F CUPBRTINO i �p y 1° , Li * IX 95M4 (408) 2 505 no SME AVFWML � SM Cr2V OF COMM I= ��ggyyIS�Y� 11, 1g9�9g2ps .. yp g y y�MM MR /��MW Af �5�+� CM iai L, Ii 1F 300 iVe{iM 4f7►J;i=t , �d7iri�'idLSb= 014 the meeting was called to order at 7:10 l.M. by C '1 'r PAbert Smage. MSS 3 Smade, Lire, Weber, and lavios Mks A Jbdson Staff P It= Dillard, Pla ner n JDO MBIGEMC 1. AVqJ 3-V-!92 01240M PEA - tipq E'+,Am and appro; to modify as sign, po�.= to � email Stye locates at be S�st corner of C Blvd. and BIanW Ave. 2. AEpl i 9-ASPJ"2 'dot - paquesting r -im and appvmral for a paimmumt windw disPPlay at an eldsting shoPPing . the sits is located at the Soutbuest corner of Stevens Creek Blvd. and Do Ann Blvd. ® On a 4-0 vote It®s 1 and 2 were amtbiled to the meeting of May 26, 1992. 3. City 99 e'ht>er ;hM Sign c�diaranros Si g% 120 - Finalize directive of Sign ttee. nu Robflza rd explained why the Minute fir, to the City mil, was tarn off the agenda for the last City Cauroi.l vesting. lire committee Umbers expressed disaRpo3nI rx 1 1 with the wig of the Minute order. On a consensus, the committee menbers astted to bwop the Minutes order refers to the City Cavrcil. amain. 2W asked that the goals and objectives, as c.*JAned in the memorandum, 4ated May 7, 1992, be sent as well. 7y stated that the meinarandum of the goals and objectives was well donee and aMested suction j and k be added to Objective 1 of coal 3 stating, "specific definitim of a sign", and "amortization of non-oonforming Ape, be added. it was also discussed that a copy of the goals and objectives be sent to the C3maber of Commerce for their Sian 0minittee to review. C mdttes Member Iavioe stated thst the Model Ordinance in the Sign Fegulation Hook, pot out by the APA, was a good Starting poir c. It was also discussed among the Committee Members that the Sign Ordinance should be kept simple with simile forms for sign size and number of signs. rs „t+2'� " .`�.' 3 u-`i`a a �''1::'r "5 :�"'" - .,�.. - es,.5�" Y "1"`�b�4ry.•` D 5. y e•r -P•a" - _sue •1# rs. J' � ;' .i.•Ilat -' =:IP.►'=-T c ', ta• -1 ':.. -+1 -•. • • .I - M, �'. a- Y•1'. �•:.YICIF. G C:IT•.:a IF a•I G • rl_. - TV : off A. 77Z M- is I' • _ ..: ..� .l' -�.P • �I:�,. ..,.•_.� _ •: - •.: i..-a .7 •rvv7• Lt - �.•1' - :J •'^ •'tom•11: -. .a, it �:= iK,1.i.. Y•L`:'1" ,,I..a 1 �Y#'A'Jij i. •� vh. / �.''`i jf t; .i.- 7 : x: ..-il.;. -',CI' ��., !I' 4.,1" :'?.9r'61 :• �17L� 1,.' ii;9` i.,;� sa.t14�:��. �.:�':. ,•♦ 1 ."tt�i," !'_ 1:.,1V: _HST.. ®It .�11*CY`-.J. i •`-' y. ;1Diad Y ' :;iH?: e. f'. -.f•.i"�"Y� ;ri^ '.b r: y .�.. �.� 1 P -1.•.^�"t. � :i J^ c.-IJ`�&J. `;io%a ,.:+. i'+•l'?.l l�•.: i �.y. `.:• .ID 15 �.:�• / 1` �xl� •: 4'i ai6+:1 ; o •:Yr;�, •It '•..- '• •- - G• _ fir.•.-.. •� ►•. •1'. ��•'IPIl III•_ •.' =� � - � ;�•••J •. - - • •. �.• s- •• - - - • = _- :•. :• .•III. - - M - f!_t -2" Matto 10. Us facia backgrOu's1 ill be a unify off-mite Ocacc. 3. Am oPaTAO&AM review and approval for an OOWI= sign at an existing restaurant ]mated. at Va11co lam Park. 210 site is ]mated at the rmthwOst =nor. of Stems DIvid. and Wolfe Rd. 2tn RObillard presented the staff rq= t noting AMC's direction from the part �t$ng a� romanded appowal.. G8nrge Britt, Ad Art sip, and eso t .-Uy4n, y4om lds, reviewed staff comments and answered questions of the ®an®ittee rues. Committee Member Lin stated that the was acceptable. Committee Member Jad(Sw questioned the lighting sauce for the sign and stated that the application was acceptable. Committee Member Weber stated that the sign was acceptable and expressed concern with the illegal winolaw signs. chairperson Foie, felt that the sign was acceptable and also expressed Cmwern regarding the illegal window signs. It was discussed amOng the COMMittee Members that a condition should be added that the neon golden axis sign facing the parking lot would be acceptable and that the neon golden arm facing Wolfe Rd. be removed prior to issuance of building permits. Decision: Cn a 4-0 vote, applic aticc 16-AS C-92 was approved atom ding to the findings and conditions stained in the Model Resolution with Ccnditim 10 and 11 added to read as follows: 10. shal Odsting l non—raf 'To den pia si;" facing Wolfe Yid. d prior to issiance of building permits. 11. 2be existing neon "Olden Arr?les" sign facing the parking lot is approved as part of this application, Fteva� 4. Apali tion 22-ASAC-92 S MgDtec ggM - gequesting review a j approval to nmdif a planned Development sign Program for an existing office building located at the northwest corner of 2brre Ave. and Rodriguez Ave. Tom Rcbillard reviewed the staff cmwnts noting which signs being replaced and which One was being added. •SIP 11 __ C:II•- •�. _ . .•=r• 6.411 it IMF- 7 Mm — l4 ell •'.1 . ._. h •.•.'l ill. _- III•- .... •r - •" • .•- _..• ':•)a, - •mil. ,_� c• ••. �_. �•. -rJ• ..M •� =-ter+- .1'.• .a:.' c•A =-. t a..' '...'-✓Il �: 1 __ �CaU�- tt - ��1-. �h'ti.�• -•'r.-`r.__. .r f i.-.' ��•:!1`'.4� -al� - 1„ t►�•:1tal _ - ...: _ .;a = u r l rtl- :F r .1. — - .r . . - :�._. - , �r. i rrl:=r _ •r =�It, 1. • 7 • 5t' ' 51 •.a'. Jl. '{1` ;}s �" L'::f r.FS?C`tA •}�^a "a.. :.. •}" :E'.IC • 'ii1.i# Y��,.�,v�.;., it .y � �.��.t ., i<•-: I iXc Y:r`' ed' kaw itK. ��., ♦�} ..�31►"H ,;• �,, 1 41 •7. -77 i 1 •. •.•.IP{I - l J •-.. ram" •. i - • - d fill ' J• • _ i• 'l.•��.: 1. •.II fit•• •.. :• `.• .=1 e�� a { ram, .,h I J•r ^'�r .y.s` r 3, =7.`=::.» •'wl-. �._. .,.•. i �.V. G• 1.= -••fb:.• r•"�_ _ ".R :r3 •y,Iwo - .�. .. • • ...•:•".i= :.►'•ice•.-. :.r.' - w). - •7 :- . k"_ ."•U. �iT.• :'••y is _ _ _• ', - Div".• .,r..., ., ..� :•......• '.,•- 'e= �.`'c .: � ,. •T--..•fir._T. ►'� •. ;: y-. y-�_ � -- ",•:. ., rt"'.sue •l •.s: ✓:••• • • 2 -w I I ow •1 •J _ ;.. �, .', -_ _..• .,. .,� •- • ,. .•': `.:� 1, •). ..��^.r.-.�"�� '•. � .^ ^ '•:.1.. ._ -.�4v- •' � II:.. r- .:.II-_" •.,• •: - •'s; + : •; tir a 1 411 -I ._• � -- �•lIP 1 :.:> •- _•Ll E-- _• I•• - •1 _•.,: _ a). •: HIV ,. � '�i*`,.:�^Ex"x-+,�fskip ?�•�x#• � �.,lax .�-Xy* � �.+t':. tir _tR` 1 ati �p in '64 it 1j 1 t VA - � �:_ 1 "ram' ,�.,- ,�.._ .^-�^�Y'^�a• ==>t. ' �,a -a�' "a'�-`�f - - �„ ,. - f:��'1'1 +`�.`i: :.: 5' lip: `.f�' ^r"J;Y{`o v.. e'.•^;6 t: ,:.4 .,t; '.,;1 ,/ =i<ftY' ie •.i yI �:;��' s;' i .t' sA':it" �-' .-tam 'l .a a �; M.Y .J5 _ t s+..) •'+`i' � } ✓°I'!J" #a.{r'S`�Y.r .e r •"�'a',�. !!: ,! •• �: � _ ly�.' is Grp :••: s7 •a. 1 tj.". :a. c �°• ,. �-z fit...- ;►'.. Ni Erg ��-•:.1r • ."��:•y�Int41�t�1,.�f.� �. • 1:1: i'_ .�.>,.t `::z S�C�L flu a'• _ ✓:S:_, .1 mot^ .r ,r�•,1-7_,i- _ �•.1'� t:'�".^'_'1 r,2. :>'it ' t. 1. i--• - P :•; - - ;:.:.=r - - r•Ii7 t1_d -� s •. - .ws _�_], =c • r.1= - ,rl Owl 4 5J MR x?t a^ r Mom.' er 22# 1992 pap 2— 2. 1- 92 AAA in the - Fopiesting Infdrmal review of a Use Permit to demob. h an existing building and aNstruct a now 2,848 sq. ft. �fast L--foo�d� restaurant. 7his site is looated. at the of Stevem Creek Bland. and Saidi Why. Zb® Robillard reviewed the past plans and design schomes leading up i1A this Virginia far*AU, Wilt Goodseal and Say Mojica, Jadc t i the Bois, intraduued the project, discussed the assign aonoept and mmiezed questions of the committee members. Commies Member Weber reiterated his past view point that the bW lding should be moved back on the lot. :ie expressed concern with the 1+Narth and We-at elevations stating that the wallsa need to be broken up with, landscaping of different arrlaital details. He stated that them- should be no mmument sign. Committee Member Jackson stated that she would rather see wood siding than stucco. Sloe stated that landscaping and an arbor should be placed along the West and North elevats wn. Committee Member Levies weed with Ommittee WAmrs Jackson and Weber regarding the need to x A the wrap. plans an the North and West elevations. Committee Air Lim stated that the design of the building :is good. He expressed concern with the amount of shoo® on the tawer Gdoments and suggested that red tiles be placed on the walls to help break up the stucco. He stated that the bike rao m in front of the building make the building look more like a fast-food restaurant. Lastly, ha expressed cow that if the restaurant is approved, large amounts of signs, flags and banners should not be installed. - -irpeYson Hmmie stated that the design is moving forward and the architecture and is good. He agreed with the other Committee ors that trellis and vises dwuld be added on the North and West elevations. Lastly, he expressed concern with the toner element stating that they are goo big. John Volckman, owner of the Stevens Creek Office Building, stated that the bu�ildug may look fine in Palm Springs but is port the look that Oapertinno should be excepting into their city. He stager', that he is very cord with the amount of trash and litter which may be produced by fast-food restaurants. Lastly, he stated that the building is not in keeping with the Grand Blvd./Parkway cat for 04mrtino. Mt. Nojica suggested that a maintenance agreement could be developed requiring that Jack in the Bans keep the site clean. In response to Committee Mwber Jackson's question, Mr. Mojica explained that t Incurs of gwraticn are from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. i • n It.�9 1� 1 a�P� ' a zedw Page 3• for an q at Lbe V of Stevens Creek� m�aa WiR>� sign un rid raviewa the staff acmuffft and argwimed qpesticm of tb-- cMllifb 'bMee, VASUbm.yqV gi jM am 4,, • the time application• 6+ZY l itte. VM&W wbw stated he wlW2 d tacit SUPPOrt t W a s Decision: on a 4-3. vote, With Cmittw Mwber � � aYmd 2 C 92 �1i p► 2 aY 3 ar ®oa�itfo� nanta d A : ti�on it Eindim 2. "at the SIM is for i! ifcatfcO to f 3. That 08 new W=IcW 'ay Win not setaWWeftm but i , $an will be egaltmated at that tim. n. Me aRAIcant sball wcxk with the owner of the sbgVi 4. on a 5-0 vats the minutes of the regu armetingof Mm a, 1992 were as submitted. In respcjWto CXumitt s Nor Jac kscm's question, Mr. Rabillar+d eoalaiawd the timing of when the meetings may start at 7:30 P.M. c=ittee pbmut the rg m sib at the Cmter and wWrewed ern regarding the' "A" sign at Fmt&M'G- Camittee Member Iaviae stated that Castro meet in Mcuntain view sews to have a very qwd sign Program. c mmittee Member fir eqwessed conoern regw'Un9 tim Oaks YAMWMt SUP, Taco Bell, Yiasso's and %b m sign Pr • a - '16,, • jR f •115 L _.� .1 r . Ap CIO 14 0015 h" •�I 'M 4W r� r 1030 AVM, CaMMMv j7j 95014 (408' OFF FMMM MEN= (V2HE �e • AND ME AP'PA0TAL OF 9M CZN OF MAW= FOR JMY 13, 1992, MMM =0 IN QMOMMM MM At 7hiS meting Vas called to ardsr at 7:eO5 P.N. by Chairperson Bowie. ML Yfinbers Absent: None Staff Present, Ttm Robillard, Planner 11 None. Zett$2 from Howardyy n itemi No. 2. s M NUMUM 2?-AS�2 Santee 9M. - Requesting review and approval to modify a Planned Development Sign Progm for an existing office building loc3ted at the Nast corner of TWre Ave. and Rodrigues Ave. Tcm Robillard revisaed tbe staff CCOMMft noting that the sign is the same sign as presented at the last mee,`famg. He reviewed YMCess oonoamns, as aqpressed at the last meeting. MdUP Wire, Matrix Design , reviewed staff comments and maw z eed questions s Of the Ommittee Members. He stated that Symenbec will be the only tarot and that the old sign prow= will be replaced if and uhm spmantec leaves. He described the purpose and intent of the sign program and rdesign. •ft y Fella, &jmw ac Corp., described the corps ations pzposee and needs- Wayland Lim abstained from vatinrg an this apgaliaatian due to being a reaen" fa mw employee of Symantec. Mt. Lim spoke as a member of the p1blic. Re stated he was diasappointed that *mantec did not modify the sign. He reiterated his past cmxmrm regarding th!,; flexibility of design and stated that the sigh simuld be rednc:ed in size. �b y9 � ^q ` ,��,. '� •" ', �"} �, - '` liar_ - '�' P�^;s,. ' I WOMEN Fa I M. IN • � 4C�7 � iiiiT i�G PaP —3— findinp and amsfi7ticm contained In tto model resolutim with condition nine zoWied to read as follan: amdtim 9. 7 he anavval is be4d upmvMrIa=S plan eot 4-V-92 (5 ) z+ ised JUy 1, 1992 and a sicced p oLitim fan adjoining awnem in favor of the project a9 Bney M ananded by conditicas (7n a 9-0 vote the minutes of the repilar meeting of atus 22, 2992 were approved as submitted. Cmuittes ituaer Lim expressed ern repNUM Tam Bell Restaurant signs. 2ta Ocircular 9latiow sigra and tally Dean's political. sign still posted on North Do lea Blvd. otitt®e Ned3er Jackson asked staff to bring ma's, shatdies and apWavalLs fram the maple R & D Maps to the next meeting. cmmfttee Nember weber expressed cow reqjmmUng the Town oar and Taco Sell sib. son asked when ASW will start their sign review ptooem. cwmittse Bar Lim expressed aoenomm rewding wad abatement at the fallowing locaticm: �.y� 1. D�ut Meal (in he rear) 2. Texaco Statim (Steen Coesk Blvd. and De Anna Blvd.) 3. S-ell statim (Stever tic Blvd. and Wolfe Ed.) Q Ow None. /''S`.. 3/ '.` r= �. �,,;.� _ S.:ry� a..'.'�°� .r.�y' �'• .l � �'� / f l` __ ,� ,1fci a � � /. N :-:, �:, �. � <}, ", .w•. � �Y(t`: �,� �.. a: q 1 a , ML'3si Ir•l #C — IW 12 • aal•a'fL1 ;i r� e i � �•a .11r 1 ., - M • o i CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPE11TINO,CALM)RNIA 35014(.408)252-4505 b4DR 1`ES OF THE REGULAR bOMMO OF THE ARCHIIMCTURAL .AND SITE APPROVAL COMMPI TEE OF THE OTY OF CUPERTINO FOR. AUGUST 24, 1992, MEETING HELD IN CONFi RENCE ROOM A,CITY HALL,AT 10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALWORMA The meeting was called to order at 7:32 P.M.by Chairperson Hoxsie. II®LL CALL Members Present: 1loxsie,Weber, Lim Members Absent: Lavios and Jackson Staff Present: Thomas R. Robillard,Planner 11 POSTPiCI IAIYJII STO T=AgENDA ORA --None. WKLI`I-E AND VEM"lCDM1Vii2TICA1'J0AS -- None. IrO.IAL RRVdE : ME RIMMSS 1. Application 27-ASAC7!-9-2 Sabrina-The Day Spa,- Requesting review and approval for a planned development sign program to an existing commercial building located on the North side of Stevens Creek Blvd. approximately 430 feet West of Vista Dr. Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments noting the height and size of the proposed sign. V vni Burgess, Osten Sign, answered questions of the Committee Members. Committee Member Weber, had no comnitnts regarding the proposed sign. Committee Member Lim, and Chairperson Moxise, expressed concern with the 36" high letter. ASAGMMU MS lint 24,19E Page-2- It was discussed among the Committee Members the sign program for the building should other tenants in the building request signs. DECISIOIeI On a 3-0 vote, Application 27-ASAC-92 was approved according to the findings and conditions contained in the Model Resolution with conditions 10 and I I added to read as follows: Condi ions 10. Signs for future tenant:;shall be centered on the facia band above the tenant space and limited to 70%of the tenant frontage. The letters shall be limited to 24 inches. 11. The color pallet shall be shiny gold viral letters. I FORMAL RE31f A 2. Application 91 004 120 Sign Ordinance update - To review final direction for the Sign Ordinance Review Committee. It was suggested by the Committee Members that flags be added to Item I; and on page 2 an additional Item L be added to read "Garage Sale Signs". There was a consensus among the Committee Members that the goals and directives reflected ASACs wishes for the direction of the Sign Ordinance Review Committee. APPROVAL OF MIMIC M 3. On a 3-0 vote, the minutes of the regular meeting of August 10, 1992 were approved as submitted. COMMITTEE REPORTS The following items were brought up by the Committee Members for staff to address: 1) Feed abatement behind the Donut Wheel, 2) The large amount window signs and "MusicNideo" sign at the Warehouse, 3) Town Center Sign Program,4) The 24-hour neon sign at Taco Bell, 5) The YMCA bingo sign, 6) The sign for _ Iandarin Books at T'..: Bottegas Center, 7) Landscaping at the Southeast corner of Stevens Creek and De Anaa Bivds. �y�y�� ws A$A .,+o Auger 24,19 .ftv.3. They al%j MMUMW and mWessed their coke WO the amouM of slPS being placed at the Sports Center steel tl�at Cupertino*Wd be held by its own r r siSns a w*' the Committee?Aembm diwassUl the SyMtec sign APPp • E—FOO T OF S ['E _None At 8:40 P.M. to the text rogtlar meeting of September 14, 1992,7:30 P.M.,Conference Room A PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: r Thomas R. Robillard Archit. and Site Approval COMM Planner E ATTEST: Doro y Co us,City Clok Msw/AMM924 -I T I W-M f. a CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 1r 0RRE AVENM CWWWO,CAUFORI'UA 95014(40 252.4_ M OF THE R MWMG OF THE C7't11tAL ARID SrM APPROVAL IN COMMMM OF THE Cny OF '17 O FOR AIBt3=10,1992,Ml'�'Mr—,�RI?lA CO OM A,CONFERENCE ROM C1TX HALL,AT 10300 AVENUE,CUpER O' ne meeting was called to order at 7:30 PAL bgr Chairperson Hoxsie. ROLE ALL Members Present: Home.We i,Lavios,Lim,Jackson Members Absent: Alone Staff Present: Thomas R.Robillard,Planner H PtAST1'O NTS/A1liITSTMP.NTS TO T AER G ORD —Alone. WitiTTRPI AN19 Vp;,RBAL C`t �i�'g`I® S — Alone. pQRi19AL RRV1E : OLD USd1VRSS e�m c•+rnantec Corn. • R� View, and ePPraW to modify a Ph8v 1. Application 22-AS. fo an existing office building located at the northwest corner,of Tare Ave. Development Sign program ; and Rodrigues Ave. Tom Robiliard rem w�staff comments noting that the�aplifi nt would explain the modifications from the last submittal and stated that stab's mommendation 4d. Design,stated that they have reduced the impact of lighting and stag that in order to Philip Wire,Matrix ons wmp and public perception of the company, than the meet the clients needs. Project remained r ��Sam- Wayland and shape of the sign on icatitur. However,he spoke as a member of the public. Wayland Lira abstainer news ,the dui and suggested that the circle and the oblong holes be He stated that the Height would remain but would look hen like a floppy disk. He stated that removed He slated that the shape as the existing sign' sign"A°should be one-sided and in the same Position Committee Member Lavtos stated that she would have the same concerns'meats as last time and that slo was disappointed that the applicant had not addressed any Of ASACs Committee Member Jackson felt that Wayland Lines suggestion for removing the holes was goal She suggested reducing the amount of lighting. Committee Member Weber stated that he is still disappointed in the sign and his comments would rfeemWn the same as past meetings and would recommend denial. Chairperson Home stated that removals of the circle and oblong holes wocicoul beereduced.significant difference in the image the sign portrays. He stated because of that the sign ght •° � �exW ASAGMINUTES August 10,1992 Page-2- Mr. Wire stated that he could reduce the size of the signs by six inches and still keep the 1 s large enough to read and in porportion to the sign. Committee Member Weber moved to deny the application. The motion died for lack of a second. IDECISID On a 3-1 vote, with Committee Member Weber desoenting and Committee Member tam abgahft Application 22-ASAC-92 was approved according to the findings and conditions contained in the Model Resolution with Condition 9 modified and Condition I0, 11 and 12 added to read as follows: Condition 9. The approval is based upon the sign criteria plan set dated August 3, 1992 with the addition of the burgmddy color sample except as may be amended by the conditions enumerated herein. In The maximum height of the sign shall be six feet as measured from the base of the sign 11. The circle and the oblong holes shall be removed from the sign. 12. Sign°A"shall be a single face sign located in the same position as the existing monument sign BUSIIVElgB: 2. Application 2LASAC-92 Mandarin GoUnag - Requesting review and approval for architectural modifications to the existing restaurant located at the southwest corner of De Anna Blvd.and Awes Dr: Mr. Robillard reviewed staff comments noting the scope of the architectural modifications He gtated staffs only concern was with the location of the monument sign and that it should be moved outside the sidewalk side triangle. Committee Member Lim expressed concern with the sign stating that he felt that the Committee needs more information as to the size and color of the letters and that he feels the lettering is too small compared to the sign. He asked for pictures of existing signs of existing Madarin Gourmet restaurants and stated a preference for externally illuminated signs. He Stated that he had no problems with the architectural modifications. Committee Member Lavios stated she has no problems with the architecturai modifications and likes the proposal to upgrade the building. She suggested, however, that the trellis be left a natural wood color rather than being painted. She also expressed some concern regarding the color palette and that the colors are too close and sutdc to have a good contrast. She agreed with Committee Member Lim's comments regarding the sign and stated the address should be on the sign. She stated she prefers external illuminated signs. Committee Member Jackson agreed with Committee Members Lim and Lavios and stated she has a preference for externally illuminated signs. Committee Member Weber stated that the address should be on the sign and that the sign should be externally illuminated Chairperson Hoxsie agreed with the improvements to the building and agreed with the other Committee Members regarding the sign d boom -R AsAMNLMES August Pap 3- 11 I On a 5-0 vats,application 26-ASAC-92 was approved accarding to the findings and conditions contahW in the Model Resolution with Conditions 10 and 11 added to read as follows: COMM 10. The sign program is not approved for this application and shall return at a future dam it. T'ae trellis work stall not be painted but left natural wood color. APPROXAL OF MITES 3. On a 5.0 vote, the minutes of the regular meeting of July 13, 1992 were approved with the following modifications: Page two under item one,Chsirpersca Hoxsie stated he was disappointed that no changes were Made to the application as directed by ASAC. He expressed concern with the large floppy Aisle as being the focal point and stated that it should be reduced In size to make less of a focal point. He stated if more tenants are added to the building then the sign program should return to ASAC. Lastly,he stator that the addiesg numbers should be piz-^ed on the Torre.Avenue sign and that a color chip should be brought to ASAC. Page three under Committee Reports, Committee Member Lim expressed concern regarding weed abatement at the following Dons: 1. Donut Wheel(in the rear) 2. Texico station(Stevens Creek Blvd.and De Anna Blvd.) 3. Shell station(former one at 4. The minutes of the regular meeting of July 27,1992 Stevens Creek Blvd,and Wolfe Rd.) were accepted by consensus. i C01Di1Ir'ME HAPOMS Mr.Rabillard reporated our the progress toeing made with Taco Bell,Pima Hut and the McClellan wall. Committee Member Lira expressed concern regarding the landscaping planting for the park area at the southeast corner of Stevens Creek Blvd.and De Am Blvd. Committee Mealber Jackson announced that Nancy Hertert has been very III and that a group of citizens are getting together to plant a tree at McClellan Ranch Park in her honor. REPORT Off'ST—&— Mr. Robilla d reported that the City Council will act on the Sign Ordinance Sub-committee at the meeting of August 17, 1992. ADJOPRNMENT At 8:45 P.M.to the next regular meeting of August 24, 1992,7:30 P.M.,Conference Room P D APPROVED BY: - Thomas R. billard Robert HOXSie Planner H Chairperson,Aieldicafiml and Site Approval Committee ATTEST• r Doroth Comelidd,City Clerk MMAMIN818 •` yy 5ni NO t I o300 TORRE AV ME,CtAftIN4 CALI CIA 95014(408)2ZO MINtT s OF THE REGULAR bUMTIIW OF THE ARCs&.tECTURAL AND ME AMOVAL �i COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUMTINO FOR MnSWER,14, 1942,NMTING qELD IN CONIFEMCE ROOM A.MY HAM,AT 10300 TC1ItRE A CUPERTINO �CALIFORMA 954�14 The meeting was called to order at 7:38 P.M. by Chairperson Hoxsie. ROLL CALL Members Present: Hoxsie,Lavios, Lim Members Absent: Weber and Jackson Staff Present: Thomas R.Robillard,Plann"11 POSTIPON§hg TS AND�I1 JUIXMEN�_IQ in A fiKVA CIIhIAEIi - None WRIXFEN AND VERRA_L-gOMMUNICATTOIgS+ None CONSENT C& / 1. Ar, ication 12-ASAC-92 2 Bank of America-Requesting review and approval to add an automatic teller machine to an existing bank located on the North side of Stevens Creek Blvd. approximately 150 ft. East of Bandiey Drive. DECISION On a 3-0,vote,the Consent Calendar was approved. NEW y 1S In ormal Review 2. Application 9-U-92 Charles Fang-Requesting early review of a Use Permit to construct a new 2,496 sq. ft. commercial building located on the East side of Peninsula Avenue approximately 50 ft. North of Stevens Creek Blvd, Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments noting that staffs concerns w-re with conformance of the Monta Vista Guidelines as outlined in the sta- report. Fuhuan Ho, Project Designer, stated that she had revised the drawings in order to address staff comments s izin the exception of the hipped roof elements. She stated that most of the buildings in the ® Monta Vista area had gabbled roofs and presented photos showing that was,the rase. Mr. Robillard confirmed that the Monts. Vista Design Guide Lines allcvwed both tripped or gobbled roofs. x. x r ASAC MINUTES Septanber 14, 1992 Page-2- Committee Member Lim expressed concern with the left elevation stating that it was quite stark in appearance. He asked that a color and material board be submitted as well as a light f3x<'um an sheet. Committee Member Lavios stated that she liked the design of the building but prefers the first scenario rather than the revision for its architectural appearance and massing ofthe second story. She stated there are many options for treatment of the left elevation that are economical, low maintenance and effective, including redwood or metal trellis, changes in materials, or architectural details. She stated'.hat she would like to see a landscaping aid irrigation plan; a color and material board and a lighting fixture cut sheet. The applicant should think about signs for future tenants. Lastly, she stated that regardless of which design was approved, that the oak tree should be saved. In response to Chairperson Hoxsie's concern regarding saving the elm tree. Ms. Ho stated that an arborists report is being done to assess the health of the trees on the site. Chairperson Hoxsie, expressed concern with the closeness of the building to the adjacent residents, especially the second floor and with the side and front setbacks.. He stated that he would like to see wood siding rather then stucco siding, stating that it goes better with the Monta Vista Design Guidelines. He also stated that he preferred the first scenario but would like to see the second story flipped and moved to the right side of the building. Chairperson Hoxsie stated that it will make the building appear less imposing on the street, and the tree will still be able to be saved. Also, it will cause less of an intrusive impact ca the adjoining residents and have better architectural treatment. FORMAL REVIEW 3. Application 28-ASAC-92 Frank and Rosalind Cardia - Requesting architectural review and approval for a storage container behind an existing shopping center located on the East side of De Anaa Blvd. approximately 125 ft. South of Silverado Ave. Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments and explained that ASAC's review of the proposal is for architectural appearance only and the use of the container is being dealt with by the Planning )epartment. He stated that staff is recommending denial of the storage container. Frank and Rosalind Cardia addressed the Committee Members and explained that the use of the container is essential to the operation of their business. They suggested a compromise by placing the container along the Northeast corner of the site, making it invisible to the adjoining residences by lan6caping or along the side of the building on the North property fine. Susan Adrian, an adjoining resident, stated that the big issue is noise and not necessarily the appearance of the container. She stated that she is very concerned with the use of the buildings as a light industrial uses rather than retail sales. Her concern was regarding the noise generated by the plumbing shop, kitchen shop, and the the shop. Committee Member Lavios, clarified the noise, appearance, and location of the container. al F f ASAC hINUM fttmbw Id, I992 P e-3- Hn response, the applicant stated that app the.Horse as not being generated by the container but probably from the equipment in the shop and$Om the other shops in the center. Committee IV ember Lim stated that the appearance of the container would be acceptable if placed in the Northeast corner of the site. He expressed concern that the larger problem with the uses at the center seems to be with the landlord and that the landlord should be involved in this prods. Chairperson Hoxsie felt that the container was an inappropriate use and expressed cones with the disturbances with the neighbors. He stated that he cannot support the exception for the container. Committee Member Lim moved to deny the application Chairperson Hoxsie seconded the denial for discussion purposes.. Committee Member Lavios stated that she was uncomfortable with denying the application and would rather see it continued in order to be oonvinced that the container will not Snake the situation worse. She stated that if the storage container will keep the business in operation, then she does not have a problem with approving the container as long as the situation is not made worse. Committee Member Lien stated his motion for denial was bec aup of the use and disturbances Wised ® by tie container and that they should be heard at the City Council level. ® The motion for denial was rescinded. DECISIOI�T On a 3-0 vote, the application was continued to the meeting of September 29, 1992 for the Committee Members to determine whets;whetl;7, a different location for the storage container would be more acceptable and to see if the disturb;-aces from the center can be mitigated. ALMOVAL OF MMTES 4. On a 3-0 vote,the minutes of regular meeting of August 24, 1992 were approved as submitted. CONiMY'>1"ME REPORTS Committee Member Lim discussed the letter he hRd written to the Council Members regarding the Symantec sign application. The Committee Members discussed eliminating the use of the word "Hit List" for code enforcement referrals. Committee Member Lavios discussed the meeting Bob Hoxsie and herself had with the Mayor Sorenson and Council Member Dean. Chairperson Hoxsi,- discussed the Sign Ordinance Review Committee mating and asked staff to send all ASAC Members the agenda and staff reports for the Review Committee meetings. He expressed ASACUMUMS - Page 4- of r ' ' on • may.he d with concern with tho p . ,up at the Sign the signs at the Sport C uw stag that . with terse -= Or .wm thew Comnium by i e"6vmws in the commift- REpORLOF STAP' Pion ABDJtA�1�11'6�1�T At 9:50 P.M.to the next regealat meeting of September 2g, 1��3`Z,7:30 P.M.,Conference ROOM A PREP r,EI9 BY: APPROVED BY: o r on Thomas obillard 4iW and Site Approval COmu ittee Planner II ATTEST: Dorothy Co elves City Clerk ASMIN914 M R. WPM zr CITY '� " A10300 T te.�RRTWO,CAI WORMA 9SA14(4�r �4 0S P REGULAR G OF THE ARC l`ECTi1RAL SrM APPROVAL ORRE Nm%qmO lg a 1992. MO CO O$'1`M CffY OF C OLTINO FOR, Una IN ROOM Ao C ' y�AT 10300 TORRE AMM CLJI ERTWO CALIFORNA 95014 The meWra was called to order at 7:36 PIC by Can RQ1,I�,f'AL Members Present: Hoxst%i WAM 1AM Vile ber Members Abe: 8acksm Staff Present: Thomas R.Robillsad,Planaer II - ��'�"�Ar11ID AlC' g... - AROM ara a� None �wt a�tt�CA'1'il�tT+l� - None �1tRto►�AI.�tE�iE� - mug recommener behin daions and 1. of a storage c,;�tttainn d an existing comments regardt appearance and iv *-PM* 125 f" South of shopping meter located on the East side of De Anza B► d. appro Silverado Ave. Tom Robillud stated that the applicant is 11'11i* a two-week continuance* on a 4-0 vote,the application was continued to the meeting of October 12, 1992. _ Requesting comments for modifying a Use 2. is 'on 20- -g6 is an existing retail center located at the Northwest Permit Condition regarding tree Preservation corner of Stevens Creek Blvd. and Mary Avenue. sed the SAC. Tom ltobillard reviewed staff�gmments noting the four issues before A�trees.eHe�stated that background of the tree removals for the site and the of the restrequired aurant from adjoining residential staff is concerned r� the lack of screening properties. He statal staffs recommendation is to replace the Tree with two new oak trees City��• meeting the same criteria as previously requiredby i S TV � * ASAC MI14t1TES IM Pap-2- Kimbaty Thurston, Coate, Have Factor, Dave Mackey, and 10 FAximm owners and arborists, representing the Oaks Center, addressed ASAC and expb&wd the background and reasons behind the small caliber oak trees which were used for mp They stated that at the tine of the rep 8" cafta freer were not aveable any whae in the sty. It was sad that the caliber sin of an oak tree is not an appropriate measure of the sin of a try but rather the canopy spread of a tree would be more appropriate. Mr CA%=wed that the crown spread between a 5"and 5"cahber size is very m;nirns►1. He stated that a 6V bore tree has an approximate 15 foot spread. A 48"box tree is approximately 12 feet tag,has an 8 foot spread and an 4"diameter trunk. Committee Member Lim ;,fated that the island, where tree No. 70 is, should be modified in order to hold a larger tree. He felt it was fine to remove the limb on tree No. 55 and would accept the tree removal of No. 70 with the replacement of two trees. The arborists were in agreement that the tree is in decline and will eventually die and that there is an opportunity now to get new healthier trees. Committee Me,,ioer Lavios agreed with the arborist to remove the tree. She stated that the two replacement trees should be placed where tree No. 70 is being removed and in a new island closer to the restaurant. She stated that the new location should be as big as possible to allow the largest tree possible. Committee Member Weber stated he would go along with the removal of tree No. 70 but it should be replaced with two 8" cah1w trees as previously required by City Council for replacement of the other oak trees. He stated that the island's size and hole should be modified in order to accept that size of tree. He also agreed with the ra- movat of the drab on tree No. 55. Chairperson Hoxsie stated that he is very hesitant to recommend removal of the large oak tree but it may be in the best interest for the long term goal of the center to remove the tree and replace it with two ne a trees. He stag that he would like to have the arborists choose the largest and best tree for the two locations. He questioned wiry smaller trews were planted and questioned the long term tree care plan. In response, the applicant addmitted that they should have returned to the City for approval of the smaller trees prior to planting them. The arborists from CC&S, OAfpA- his firm has aggressively ;rovtded the necessary tree care since they have been contracted to do so. The general consensus of the Committee Members was that tree No. 70 may be removed and replaced with two large specimen oak trees. One located where tree No. 70 is currently standing and the other directly South of tree No. 70 in a new planter, to be constructed. ASAC recommends removal of the large limb on tnw No. 55. They found the location of the replacement tree to be acceptable. ASAC agreed that the applicant should have returned to the city for approval of the smaller caliber tree sues of the replacement, but f mud the eplacemant trees to be acceptable. ASAC MENUTES September 28, 1992 Pap.3.0 - 3. App9i ion -SAC 14401 Nelson Chao - Requesting review and appmml of a precise development plan for an of c rUstorage building located at the Northeast sector of Stevens Creek Blvd. and Peninsula Avenue. Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments adid noted the scope of the precise development Flan. Frank Oldham, project architect, reviewed sty comments and answered questions of the Committee Members. Committee Member Lavios stated that is was acceptable to defer the landscaping until the area had been abandoned by the slate. She stated she prefers elevations labeled 2B and that the Spanish Sand color was acceptable. Committee Members Weber and Lim concurred. Committee Member Lim stated that the sip should be submitted under a separate application and that the lightings at the front of the building may be approved by staff Chairperson Hoxsie clarified that only three trees are to be planted at this time and the irrigation should be installed. He stated it is acceptable to have staff approve the lighting. Lastly, he expressed concern with the landscaping on the State right-of-way land. He stated ahat he agrees with staff that a permanent landscaping plan should be approved at this time. IDECISION On a 3-1 vote, with Chairperson Hoxsie disenting, Application 14-U-91 was approved according to the fktdings and conditions contained in the model resohition with Finding 2 deleted, Condition 9 modiS-td,and Conditions 10, 11, 12,and 13 added to read as follows: CONDITIONS 9. The approval is based upon site plan dated August 17, 1992. Elevations labeled 2B dated Septembe-r 9, 1992. An Kelly Moore Paint colors No. 231, Spanish Sand and No. 27 Bone, except as may be amended by the conditions enumerated herein. 10. Lighting at the front of the building shall be approved by staff prior to issuance of building permits. 11. The sign program for the building shall be approved by ASAC prior to its installation. 12. The landscaping plan dated September 8, 1992 is not approved as part of this application but shall be returned to ASAC as such time as the land between the driveway and Stevens Creek Blvd. is abandoned to the property owners. .. K 4r ASAC MINUTES September 28, IM Page-4 13. The three eucalyptus trees on the Eau$side of the building shall bey to 10 gallons in size and fifigation shall be installed prior to occupanq of the The landscaping shall be properly On a 3-0 vote, with Committee Merry Weber abstaining, the minutes of September 14, 1992 were approved with the following modifications. Page two (21 fifth (56) paragraph, ... economical, low mainte;iance, and eve, including redwood or metal trellis, changes in atatedak or architectural details. Also, ... a lighting fixture cut sit. The applicant should think about *w for feature tenants. Sixth (6th) paragraph replace period after Iree with a comma and unlace access math assess. Seventh (7th)panWaph, fist(1st.)sentence add, ... and with the side-Ad AW setbacks. Page three(3), eighth (8th) paragraph add, ... for discussion purposes. Page four (4) under Committee Reports add second (2nd)paragraph, The Commies Members discussed eliminating the use of the word "Hit Lists for code enforcement referrals. CQDEM=SORTS Committee Member Weber asked about the status of the Pizza Hut window mural and the sign program for Town Center. Committee Member Lavios discussed the up coming joint meeting with City Count. Committee Member Lim expressed concerns regarding unused signs which were stud being illuminated. He also reported on the Mayors luncheon. Chairperson Hoxsie reviewed the status of the Sign Ordinance Review Committee and expressed concern regarding the planting of the McClellan Avenue crib wall. Committee Member Lim asked staff:to look into ASAC receiving sound-off cards and minutes of the Planning Commission and City Council mugs. REPORT OF STAFF - None r • ��may. Wi At 10:00 PAL do the nen reguhr meeft to be held on timber 12, IM 7:30 PAL,coAremee Room A. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: f Z—. Thomas R. bi lend _ Planner H &Sit4eA r committee ATTEST: G Dorothy tL%car auk Alsw/mN92s e 1 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALF ORNIA 9SO14(408)252-4505 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ARCHIT1ECI UM AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR OCTOBER 12, 1992,MEE`MG HELD IN CONFERENCE ROOM A,CITY HALL,AT 10300 TORRE AVE14M CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 The meeting was tailed to order at 7:32 P.M. by Chainerson Hoxsie. F.OLL CALL Members Present: Hoxsie,Lavios,Weber; Committee Member Lim arrived at appi oximately 7:50 P.M. Members Absent: None Staff Present: Thomas R.Robillard,Planner II POSTPONEMENTS AND A133[1STMEN'I'S TO TIl<E AGEN)!DA®RIDER 3. Application ASAC 51 934.2 Batch Brothers-Applicant request continuance for two weeps due to health reasons. On a 3-0 vote, item 3 is continued to the meeting of October 26, 1992. WRITTEN AND VERBAL COMhfl CATIONS - None INFORMAL REVIEW: 1. Application 28-ASAC-92 Frank and Rosalind Cardia - Requesting recommendations and comments regarding appearance and screening of a storage container behind an existing shopping center located on the East side of De Anza Blvd. approximately 125 ft. South of Silverado Ave. Tom Robillard reviewed the staff continents noting that under the new Zoning Code Codification rules the Director has the authority to make minor modifications to existing Use Permits. In this case the Director will grant approval of the storage container for a one year period with the condition that the appearance and location of the storage container be reviewed by ASAC. Frank and Rosalind Cardia addressed staff comments stating that they would rather put the ® storage container'on the Northeast corner, which would take up one pairing stall. The video of the site was shown. .C a ASA LIB EYMS Oar 12, 1992 Page-2- Susan Adrian,adjacent residence,expressed concern with the use of a plumbing shop in the center and the use of a storage container as extra square footage for the center. She also expressed concern regarding the large hub container salting drectly behind her fence and a number of smaller trash containers spread throughout the property. Committee Member Weber asked staff to look at the floor area ratio with the outside storage shed by the pet store. He expressed concern regarding the garbage containers not placed in enclosures. Committee Member Lavios expressed concern with a large trash container and where it was placed. She stated that if it is placed at the Northeast corner it will be visible for the neighbors. Chairperson Hoxsie expressed concern with the trash containers not being placed in enclosures. He stated that the storage building should be on the North side of the building. He stated that he does not see a clean solution to the problems but that staff should find a way to resolve all the tra:-,h problems behind the building. Ms. Cardia suggested building a higher fence adjacent to the residence in order to help screen the rear area. Committee Member Lavios suggested placing a trellised fence in front of the container. The Committee Members discussed looking into making the wall adjacent to the residences higher. Committee Membtw. Weber stated that he was apposed to any approval of the storage container. 2. Application ASAC 5-U-74 Siemens Corporation - Requesting recommendations and comments regarding the architectural treatment of modifications to the exterior of an existing industrial building. The site is located at the Southeast corner of Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue. Tom Robillard stated that this case is similar to the previous and that the Director is making a minor modification to the Use Permit with a condition that the changes be reviewed by ASAC. Mr. Robillard reviewed the scope of the modifications. Dick Campbell, consulting architect, reviewed the scope of the modifications and answered questions of the Committee Members. Committee Member Lim stated that he had no problems with the proposal. Committee Member Lavios expressed concern with the removal of the tree and landscaping along the South end of the property. She suggested planting vines along the wall on the South side of the property to help break it up. Committee Member Weber suggested placing a tree at the Southwest island adjacent to the wall. He also reiterated Committee Member Lavios'comment for planting vines along the South wall. ASACtAdMt3'F October 12, 1;992 Page-3- Chairperson Home expressed concern wkh do removal of the large specimen tree which was identified as an 191 diameter Japanese Bht . Committee Member Lavios stated that an oboists report should be done to see if the wall can be built around the tree. The Committee Members dis aissed the ides dw the wall should stop and start on either side of the tree with a chain-link fence in-between. FORMAL.tEVIM 4. Application 30-ASAC-92 Bank of America-Meeting review and approval to install three new AIM automatic teller machines at an exisft bank located on the South side of Stevens Creek Blvd. approximately 200 feet West of Finch Aveiiue. Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments soling that the condition of approval is included to require approval from the Santa Clara County Sheriff Department prior to installation. ® Larry Sato,project architect, answered questiow of the Committee Members. By general consensus,the Committee Membera fift the application was acceptable. DECISIQN On a 4-0 votes - Application 30-ASAC-92 was approved according to the findings and conditions contained in the Model Resolution. 5. Application 29-ASAC-92 Micro Module System- Requesting review and approval to modify a planned development sign program for an asisting officelndustrial building located at the terminus of Ridgeview Court. Tom Robillard reviewed the s, >ps of the project Ming that the signs are simple replacements of existing approved signs. He noted that the freeway oriented sign, which Digital had before, was denied by ASAC but approved by City Council with a clear direction that they wanted the business to have freeway oriented signage. Clare Wilde, Sign Classics, reviewed staff commests and answered questions of the Committee Members. Committee Member Weber stated that he will not approve a freeway oriented sign. He stated that it does not conform with the requirement of the Sign Ordinance, that the use identified by the sign does not require freeway oriented signage. ASACfiWn dUTES October 12, 1992 Page-4- Conmrittee Member Lavios mWessed concern with the future illumination of the monument sign given that the background color is white and when illuminated tend$to be very bright. Committee Member Lam expressed no concerns with the proposal. Chairperson Hoxsie stated that he feels the building sign does not meet the criteria for freeway oriented signs but would approve the application due to the direction of City Council. DECISION On a 3-1 vote, with Committee Member Weber descenting, Application 29-ASAC-92 was approved according to the findings and conditions contained in the Model Resolution. NIIIVUTES 6. On a 4-0 vote, the minutes of the regular meeting of September 28, 1192 were approved as submitted. COUMIT rEE REPORTS Committee Member Lim expressed concern with the final design of the Mc Donalds Play Land Structures. He stated that he feels that the appearance is not very good. He also asked 9#-tff to look into the building color change at P.J. Mulligan, stating that the new green color does not look good. Committee Member Weber asked staff to have the City Council minutes placed in the ASAC packets. He also;asked about the progress of the Pizza Hut wall mural and the broken up car in the parking lot next to Pizza Hut. Tom Robillard stated that the Public Works Department is looking into cashing the landscape bond and planting the required landscaping on the McClellan Road retaining wall. Chairperson Hoxsie reviewed the progress of the Sign Ordinance Sub-Committee. REPORT OF STAFF Tom Robillard stated that Pat Jackson had officially resigned from the Committee due to health reasons. ASAC/iu[WUTES Page-S- AifO �+t14 .1dT71' a� rlat. ASAC, to be held en At 9:00 P.R . to the joint City CoaQ�i!lASAC October 26, 1992,7:30 P.M..Confcmm R C. PREP BY: APPROVED EY: -L- 14dz C erson Thomas R. Robillard rp Site Approval COMMi . Planner H ATTE�' Dorothy Cornelius. City Clerk m[NJ0Ivm=udW ,z x. . MWMAI 0 a CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALIFORNIA 95014(408)252-4505 MINUTES OF'f 1E REGULAR MEETING OF THE AR.CIUTECTURAL AND WE APP&"" /AL COMMITTEE OF THE CYTY OF CUPERTINO FOR OCTOBER 26, 1992,MEETING HELD IN CONFERENCE ROOM C,WY MALL, AT 10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPERTINO,CALIFORNIA 95014 The meeting was called to order at 7:32 P.M. by Chairperson Hoxsie. ROLL CALL Members Present: Hoxsie,Lavios,Weber,Lim All City Council Members were present for the joint meeting. Members Absent: Alone Staff Present: Robert Cowan,Director of Community Development,Thomas R. Robillard,Planner II, Dorothy Cornelius, City Clerk,Chuck Kilian,City Attorney 1. A joint meeting between City Council and Architectural and Site Approval Committee to discuss items of mutual concern. The items include the basic roll and purpose of the city government, perceived problems with current system, what do we want Cupertino to loot: like?, examples of applications; ASAC responsibilities mZarding architecture signs, siding and landscaping. Please see minutes of joint City Council/ASAC meeting of October 26, 1992. The joint meeting concluded at 9:10 P.M. The regular ASAC meeting commenced immediately following. FORMAL REVtEW 2. Application ASAC 51.834.2 Bateh Brothers - Requesting r,;-riew and approval to p"-,:ce architectural barriers around an unimproved lot to prevent parking. The site is located at the Southwest corner of Stevens Creek and Foothill Boulevards. Albert Bateh reviewed staff comments and answered questions of the Committee Members. He asked if he could place the bollards approximately 15 feet in from the property line in order to allow trucks to park. Staff responded that no parking can take place on an unimproved surface. The heights, spacing, location, and materials of the bol!:�,rds was discussed by the Committee Members. It was decided that the bollards should be rude of wood with a minimum size of 6" x 6", be 3 feet high and spaced at 6 foot intervals. It was also decided that the exact location of the bollards would be decided by staff. e ASACiMMMS October 26, 1992 Page-2- DEC ON On a 4-0 vote,application ASAC 51,834.2 was approved according to the findings and conditions contained in the Model Resolution with Condition 10 added to read as faiiows: condition 10. The applicant shall place 3 foot high wood bollards at 6 feet on center around the perimeter of the unimproved portions of the applicants lot. The wood bollards shall be a minimum.of 6"x 6" size. The precise location of the b-llards shall be approved by staff. 3. Application 31-ASAC-92 John Ash Group- This application was withdrawn at the applicants request. APPROVAL OF MUYUTES 4. On a 4-0 vote the minutes of the regular meeting of October 12, 1992 were approved with the following modifications: 4 Page two,third paragraph, second sentence,replace he with she. • Sixth paragraph to read... Committee Member Lavios suggested placing a trellised fence in front of the container. Sevent''.paragraph to state... The Committee Members discussed looking into making the wall adjacent to the residences higher. Page three, second paragraph to read... Committee Members Lavios stated that an arborists report should be done to see if the wall can be built around the tree. Third paragraph should read... The Committee Members discussed the idea that the wall should stop and start on either side of the tree with a chain-link fence in- between. COMMITTEE REPORTS The Committee Members asked staff to look into the Mc Donald's Playland, the Pizza Hut wall mural, the colors for PJ Mulligans, the signs at Ross Dress for Less, and new landscaping that was planted at the Community Church on Foothill Blvd. and Cristo Rey Drive. REPORT OF STAFF None ASACUINtMS Odobw 26L 102 Page-3- A®JOiJRtylihi�' At 9:45 p.ra. to the next regular meeting of ASAC to be held on November 9, 1992, 7:30 p.m.,in Conference Room A. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: 'Thomas . Robillard Robqt Planner 11 Ar- Site Approval Committee ATTEST: ® 1 orothy Cornelius City Clerk MIN 1026 r CITY OF CUF'll '$ No 10300 TOMME AVENUE,CS1I?ERT0,CALAKMNIA 9SO14(408)232- 5 IMMUTES OF TM REGULAR b§MTM OF THE ARCMECTMAL AND SM APPROVAL COMME (W Th%MY OF CUPERTWO FOR NOVOMM 9, 1M MIEB G EWD IN CONFERE14CE ROM C,MY EIAIA AT 103M TORRE AVENE)E,CMERTM,CALIFOR-MA, 9S014 AWOUh81e1>tWENT Adjourned for lack of qwffuw to the next regular> ft&g of ASA,,%to be held on Ncwenber 23, 1992, 7:30 p.m.,in Ckmfimmw Room A. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: e homas R. Robillard 11 d` o !e, Planner and Site Approval Committee ATTEST: Dorothy City Clerk MNI 1992 9 ^+: .7 ham"_ j a}' 4,. Y,Ff, y if✓ ai . r OF W CITY OF CUFZRTINO AVENUE,C EO,C OI 95014( 252-4 50 10300'TORRE APPROVALIE OF THE-EM" �•E`MG OF THE CCU 11 ,�G� Tli+lO POR. Now" CO1 owns OF THE CITY OF CUI Ot R A,CTTy AT HEDINC® Q'CIF®R� 45014 10300 TORRE A'� The meeting was culled to or&r at 4:04 PIL by Imo• RO___A Mem1r preseaHoxsie,Lavin,Wes,Lem Members Absent: bone Staff Present: Thomas I•Robillatd'planner U ER POS'i'IP0 1tii11;*a"a�ptyLD QSTlU1Eh aS TO Tffi;A44_ �_.ORD -None N CAI.C CATIONS -None CONSENT t_'A""_ARftpgsf mg review and approvalfor a growd SIV locawd at the 1. Aveffum p lication 34-ASAC-92��°-�-�� Northeast darner of Tar►tau and ge 2 Cancellation of the w'Wae meeting ofDecengm28'1992 On a 4-0 vote,the Cwk%M Calendar wasWwve& IrORTiRAL._ �, and mmments on a proposed pig Ouctim in the ►ication 10-U-92 W_ el and Blvd. 3' Sure�g lot between the Sears building �Ong ASAC's ideas and ca��on the prono�� Tom Robillard reviewed stab rO11 rnents noting that staff Planning ®n at tonight's (Navembe parking structure. Those comments will be forwarded to the 1992)meeting the pedestrian lain the login and a a&ed locatio°e°f the��• He dish Sohn Endicott,Westfield Inc-,exp side not n linkages and bridges. He explained that the easterly He feels that it is a dot to the vrs'bility of Committee Member Lim stated that he does not like the sue• Ceeek Blvd is not good fat the city or for Sears. He •,that the aesthetic appearanceredesigning the ing MIMM to Bouts He suggested t ��be the diction t�ce city is going towards for subterranean or covered with other businesses. ASAC SPECIAL rd=TJNO.'; MIND I:S Novaaber 23,4992 Pap 2- Member Lavios concern with the appearance and the lack of any intelests. She stated that she would like to see more ardftctmal inter designed into the state and the the walkway should be visible and inviting,but vat bright or garish. N=W]Brunet,resident, expressed concern with the a mp and futon signs on the sue,eVecift for the ems. Mr.Endicott explained the sign proposals. He stated that there would be a madmboard at tin man entgam near McDonalds and a readaboard sign on the South elevation of the panting structure. Committee Member Weber stated that if this structure is a copy r :isting psntittg guagm it will no be a good looking structure. He stated that he would like to see sub' parking. He suggesteil instead c°having the pedestrian linkage jog around the building, the walkway a.. ,be made through the parsing strucaue into Sears. Lastly,he stated that he would recommend denial;,-'the project. Chairperson Hoxsie stated that he felt the location of the structure is not the best. However, taking all things into consideration, the city must make the best out of a poor situation. He stated that more architectural interests should be built into the structure. Commits Member Lim so-gested that there must be a better solution to the parking structure. He feels the city is rup,Lang too fast into the situation,that it would not look goad and that it will last a very long time. He sad more serious consideration should be made into alhmnatives, 4. 4ualicaiion 81,954.5 Cih of Cuupertmo. Adding Chag_tea : 15, Xeriscape jMftyging of the Cupertino haunicigal Cade -Requesting review and comments on the prop Xeuiscape Ordinance. Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments nosing why the City needed to adopt a Xenscape Ordinance. He outlined the changes proposed from the Xenscape Guidelim to the Xenscape Ordinance and discussail the different enforcement possibilities. Committee Member Weber made the following corrections to the Ordinance: 1. Section 4- should exempt single-family hLms. 2. Section 7.2 larger aree wells should be required for oak trees. 3. Se.�ion 10,41h paragraph to read,the efftc lent opci ation of irrigation equipment maybe subject to city inspection. . . All Committee Members agreed with Committee Member W&-n—b suggestions Chairperson Hoxsie stated that Section 7.10 is inconsistent with Number 3 of the compliance checklist. Section 7.10 states that the minimum dimension of any turf area should be 15 feet. Number I of the compliance checklist states that the minimum turf area should be h feet. He also stated the City should at least follow th "spirit"of the ordinance. 5. Application 2-U-81 (Modifiedi Scott Design Associates -Requesting early review of a use permit modification to add a second story Adition, increase the floor area ratio and coverage, and reduce the ground floor rear yard setbacks. The house is located at 22573 Woodridge Court. Tom Robillard reviewed staff comments nosing the scope of the projects:;relationship to the ltl Ordinance. ® Scott Cunniu,g,`am also reviewed the scope of the project and aasweered questions of the Committee Members. Committee Member Lavuos questioned the appearance of the mass of the patio enclosure as it is viewed from the adjoining,esidential neighbors. RPM- ►SAC SPECUL ti+d=TING MI OJM Nevada 23,1g92 Pap-3- Mt Cunningham explained that Me POO WU made of Skims wtdch tcduces do Wmance of - f Muse Member LaWas stall that she would Mw to ads sure that the nei&=to the rear knew about ft hanges- Ali the Committee Members Weed that the plan shouts be signed off by all staining neighbom ComnAn—Member Weber fdt tho the lot and tttel4 foot setback are to small,and the Saar area ratio is too high. He suggested eliminating the green house. Chairperson Hoxsie also vqmsed concern ceding the setlmick and the floor area ratio. 6. A mhandon 11-U-92 Bradw-lnt'i (OtiDr% - Ong early review of a use permit to demolish an existing restaurant and construct a new 4,693 square foot restaurant, low on the South side of Stevens Creek Blvd. approximately 380 AM West of Blaney Avenue. On a 4-0 vote,item Six(6)was conSnued to the re, w meeting at 7:30 PAL 7. Attatication 33-ASAC-92 Arrow n-Reque9bg a tigtt exception Yor a graurtd sign located on North D Anaa Blvd.approximately 3-A fecs South of Homestead Road. Tom Robillard reviewed staff comments noting that,if'the center was considered as a whole shopping center,there are already two existing signs. However,if the ceaw was split into its existing separate parcels,then the proposed sign will be an off-site sign. I D. Vanderlaan,representing the owner,and Lori fA' ham,Arrow Sign,reviewed staff comments and answered questions of the Committee Members, Committee Member Lim suggested replacing the Payless sign with an upgraded sign including Payless,REl and Michael's. He stated he has heard that Michaels would like a monument sign as well. He suggested staff check with the fire department regarding any sedock restrictions for the sign and the water pump. Lastly,he stated that De Anna Blvd.is not the best place for a sign due to visibility and the speed of cars. Committee Member Lavios stated that a makes more sense to view the center as a whole rather than two separate parcels. She suggested redoing one of the signs so that there is no more than two signs. Committee Member Weber stated that the center already has three signs including Carl's Jr. He stated that the sign, is proposed, is too high and that an 8 font sign would be more acceptable. lastly, he stated that since ivfi%;hael's will also want a ground sign,they should be integrated together. It was decided that the applicant would prefer that this item be continued so that they can propose an alternate plan. Decision On a 4-0 vote,application 33-ASAC-92 was continued to the meeting of December 14, 1992. t 'h - �� ASACMMaALPAZMGMMVM page 4- Alld®URNMRl At 6:15 p nL to the ngda maeft November 23,lMst7-30PMCorfae=Room& P1tEP oiY: APPROVED BY- j 4F/ OMMM lt. Planner I1 --PVK and M A pA Committee ATTEST: Dorothy ConwlKm City Calear1c Mini 123s max, xF :s v z ' f a% 9 - CITY OF CUPERTINO m00 Tom AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALMOPUNIA 95014(409)252-4505 MINUTES®F THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ARCI31TECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL. COADUT TEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR NOVEMI3ER 23, 1992,MEETING HELD IN COWERENCE ROOM A,CITY HALIy AT 10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALIFOILY►11A 95014 The meeting was called Z.s order at 7.40 P.M.by Chairperson Hotnde. Rt�CALL Member Present: Hoxse,l.avios,Weber,Lien Members Absent: None Staff Present: Tbomw R.Robillard,Planner 11 t rrtirr M trtrn FROM THE SPECIAL MR MG QF 1VOi►ERdBER 23.1292 2"MEMAL RENEW 6. Application I1-U-92 Brinker LnA Chili's - Requesting cagily review of use permit to demolish an existing res inm and construct a new 5,693 square foot restaurant, located on the South side of Stevens Creek Blvd. approximately 390 feet West of Blaney Avenue. Torn Robi lard reviewed the staff comments noting the scope of the project. Kim Woodard,Brinker Intl.,reviewed staff comments and answered questions Lfithe Committee Members. Committee Member Lim stated that he felt the fame looks odd;especially because it is not connected with the main building. He stated that it tends to look like a HdVwaod set. He suggested connecting the facade with a trellis work or some other similar structure to the,.am building and add more vegetation. Committee Member Lavios exprsecd concern of the missed opportunity,for the City, to get people and bring a liveliness out to the street with the building being set so far back and with no proposals for outside seating. She stated that more vegetation should be added to liven up the front. The Committee Members discussed signs on the fasmdc and on the building. They determined that two signs on the facade and one sign on the building would be acceptable. Committee Member Weber felt that the faces will be interesting. Chairperson Hoxsie stag that he fell that the facade will not work for the site and that the building is set too far back. REGULAR ITEMS; INFORMAL.REVIEW 1. Application ASAC I-U-90 Terry_Brawn-Requesting informal review of colors, materials, and landscaping for a single family home located at 10342 Scenic Blvd. Tom Robiliard reviewed the staff comments noting that the scope of ASAC review is for the color of thee materials and landscaping. ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE MINUTES 3 of 3 1992 & 1993 -2- Terry the tt� ann8 Sntt�tere atd and taft� , Tom Rdeam reviewed tare paumwhich were btonplit up izt of k�er fit�►'� Mr- ®lack, dom�► presented pge�hs of�alto and his con�r+s. MemW Weber had no piablerns withdWnatingthe drWcmy at am top and stated do the decks show not be built arithin tlic drip line of the tree. not have. to address the landscaprng• Committee Member LOVIDS Sb led that she doesdwk within the drip line would be accOWAe as long as an tt tam SU Stated��d�a ftprdmg the line was artrig�lt stating that MOOCOOn review and�di to modify a precise d,, elopment plan Rid opposite g ,;�++ASAC 7 U-87 Temt_Brawn - Mira vista Road. for tl�moping of a retaining wall on McClellan Hoxsie excused bitn�self from voting on this application dare to his living across the street from the wall" heed to ozrme 0 a Committee Member Weber stated drat Plants will rro8 grow itt the> �and t and water �callyr along the wall to help and to fertiiiz+e �1 He st p ng this application in one yam. mare aftm He suggested Committee Members Lavtos,lam and Weber,agreed. ,ft Committee dish to approve the application or oontlrare it inao"*MW the Plants have grown Deci�oa On a 2-1 vote, with Coinmi Member Weber d ' with F?inding l modaded and a todre Ftndmp editions dontamed in Conditions 2,and 3 added to'ad as Findin That the proposed landscaping plan will paver the wallCier�dy an3 will use low water. 1. Conditions a second opinion from a registered 1a�s�architect,approved by 1 The applicant shall obtain, aping scheme to meet the intent- staff,to determine if the pmposed landscaping is the best landsc 2. The applicationin one Year, shall be reviewed 3. Strings shall be placed verticaUY along the wall to help the vines grow. The applicant shall fiertilize and water the plants f g*"O'• hffROVA OF NdlNf]'fES on a 1-0 vote,the minutes of the regular Meetingof October 26, 1992 wee approved as srehmitted. is r consensus,the Minutes of November 9,1992 were found to be aoceptable- (t i •{1 • o •. :(' t �A Ft( ''%i'-0l L'S"'1'.. .-Usldt)Yi tie' i.:�M'"r:'d ♦ll't 13 f[+^., .:,�1{f,.:t' :1� :...i:a :w`:'rf Sf. )l.t',� s: -.+�1'/t(J.t,.0 '''f'- _ _ .r �. •!! f I' 1 G"1' a:� 7:. IIFa�CI_ '(/- i"- 1;?{ 1' 5:11 J1 .1 .•j� [. t- i[I if 'UF.' it S C • tl . - °ya : - .r a - u±r M wlrt� 103-00'fORM AVENW CUPERTWO,CAWOHMA 95014(408)252-4505 AMDWED MVWIW OF THE REGULAR 11r1EET NO OF THE MCH[TECTURAL Ai+1O SITE MPROVAL COARAWM OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR DEMgM 14, 1992, MWWO HUM IN CONMENCE ROOM A.CITY HAU AT IMW TORRE AVENUk C[hERT'INO.CAL1FORNU 95014 The meeting was COW to ordar at 7:30 P.M.by Chdrpmon ate. ROLL CALL Member Present: Home,Lavim Weber,Lint anived at 7:35 Members Absent: None Staff Present: Thomas IL Planner It POSTPONEMENTS AND rO THE AGLNDA ORDER -None WRnrTEN AND 3%BRAL e9M2909-CA- —l"N -None FORMAL REVItEW I. Al2lication 1AMON (modifiedi Bank of AMM - Requesting Vie, and approval to moft a Planned d0v`010111110ot sign program to allow two monk signs at an mshng bank building located on the South side of Stevens Crack Boulevard approAmately 200 fed West of Irm ch Avenue Tom Robillard reviewed&a staff comments noting the scope of the project and recommended denial. George Helleric h. Mina-tree Signs incorporated, reviewed the staff comments and answered questions of the Committee Myers. Committee Member Tani stated that he had no problem with the main ant sign as long as an address was Placed on it. He stated he felt the drive-up telter directional sign was not needed,especially in the Proposed location as the driveway in that location was very narrow and hard to use. Committee Member Lavios agreed with Committee Member Lim that the smaller dirational sign was not needed and that the new proposed sign looks better than the existing sign. Committee Member Weber and Chairperson Home felt thee:approving the monument signs would canes an over proliferation of signs at the site. DECISION On a 3-1 vote, with Committee Member Lim descantio& application I-ASAC-90 (modified)was denied according to the findings contained in the Model Resolution. f l I'&WUM 6•ii7AJ3'b7 bw now for denial mu betty the *WWOW s ch*wVftft"dftWouuddpwoWbr mmtb=WLUwoumnwmfttmamwdaloyatbalft in Ehe Qty. A?MO-X L QF men= 2.and 3. On a 4-0 V0% the minutes of the regular meedu of Nuvember 23, 1992 ad Ehe mhow d the Spedal Mceft of November 23,1992 were appwved as SdRDittc COMB ) Committee Member lane ash staff to check the Symantec sib fbr conibrmance with dtY appravN. Committee Member Weber asl£ed to look into the Town Cash signs. REPORT OF STAR Staff reported on the City Cumicil decisions regarding the parking sbuctnre for Westfield Inc., the P109=of t: xeriseape Ordinance and dud City QwnW had graved the kndscgmfor the McClellan Road=Wning wall. ANPURWUNT At 8:15 P.M.to the neat FROM mpg to be held On JaMINY 11, 1"2,7:30 P.M.Ca fhem Rom A. BY: APPROVED BY: Thomas R.Robillaad � - Planner Il wd Site Approval ComMMC ATTEST;,, Dorothy Co City Clerk ��m�nsztsn CITY OF C'Vpzx—TINO, .;'I APPROVAL MMUM VT 3O REGMAR W 0,OF ARCHUSCrURAL COW&Tr E OF vM CTTY jIF CUpMTW0 FOR JANUARY 11, 1 ,hMMG HEW a4 CONFEWNCE ROOM A.CITY HAU-,,AT lOM TO E;AVENt1E CUPERTINO C O 95014 The meding was called to order at 7.37 P.K by R®f.Y.CALL Member Prey Haulai,Lavaca►Weber Members Absent: Lima Staff Present: Throw R.Robillard,Planar 11 gAg� NTS A,NIf Alal�T�i,`r"°e Tn�a[�.t��►Afltilll� -NOW VE]RUM f�M1VIL>SIN[t^AATdON� -Now AIF®WAL RED 1. AWli on 1 AAM Westfield Inc -Rig review and commmem on ft atichitectumd appearazwe of a new parking saucum located at Vallee Fashion Patk a¢paent to Sears and Stevens Creek Bawls vard. Tom Robillasd reari,e vd staff comml meting that staff preffe;s the ongmal design c=CW of the paIWg ire. �:outlined the commits as state in the staff repaart. Jim Ellar.rqMwHtWWesf M I=,mbioduc ed the project and the praM architect. Terry Ferrera,psojea ambitead,tel the scope and mdftcWM derails of Wesffid s puftned design and 9 -so"ted vasm of the original desiga concept Committee Member Lavios stated that she prefferr+ed the os pnd design pr l- She expressed concern with the design of the oovemd v-W]may stating that it did not p well with the W&ftcWd style of the budding- She reaw vA sWS Comments stating comems with the colored flood lights and the possible to the building. She stated she prefers the amount of ambitec kmIl dowiling as shown on the original design concept and if a neon ban was placed on the building it should be subtle and used only to big 'igbt the architecdual details. She stated that she pn feas vines on the fmat trellis weak lather than shrubs. Committee Member Weber stated that he prefers the original design concept as well,but stated that the Meow leading to the matt should be an integral awbita*val feaEme of the building rather than an attached canopy The other Committee Members agreed. Chairperson Hmm stated he also preffets the original design concept and agreed with the oammefitS,hem the other Committee Members. Committee Member Lawos Mated that this is an opportunity to retura vivaciousness to an otherwise doll shopping center and that it should be taken advantage Of. ASACbMOYM lnaitdin$�18s txx tt►be e3 no e stated that the vivadousnessof do bAWWg should be aftemed in a tewpmy or seasonal basis tether t permanent of thctas go acid out o?PsEy . 2. Ae"Mdm 36A 6 ( Nod 1 VS review and coxnamb far alchitactasat to=eidsting offia builtling. IU toodfficakm Include mbft a toond Story balcony on the Noth won. The site is located at the SouftM Corner®d Stc Cicalaftfivmdawl Torre Avenue. Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments mpg that the 100 sq. I =closure does men the Gw al flan and Zoning Gail Boettcher,Design Advauiage,and C. Donald Allen,Cupertino National Bank,mviewed the scow of the project and the need to eliminate the ballcoay. Committee Member Weber stated that the building may look odd with only on balcony,and stated that the balcony is a needed architectund fi mum of the building to provide rdid Commmme Amber lavios stated that she will support the proposal because tiro building was desigasd poorly in the first place and that reMOT21 ofthe baksM will not maloe a diffimm in its Committee Member Hanie stated that he would support the proposal agreeing with Committee Member lavios. E—OHNAI.RRVIE®Il 3. Application 35-ASAC-42 Sonlite Sim& Inc - Ytequ�ing review and approval to math fy a planned development sign program to allow tm n m window signs for a siagte tenant in an a dstmg shopping center. The site is loud at the Soudn p-corner of De Am Boulevard and Fkmnstmd Road. Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments noting that N--ff is recommendmig denial for two reasons: ij that the Sign Ordinance Committee has developed criteria,for�aeon window no for commercial centers and this proposal does not mat those miteria;2' Three neon window signs in such a small)store faont would muse a over proliferation of signs at the Center since other tenants in the Center would be allowed the am number of signs to be egdtability. Dan and Karen Nitta wvwwW the staff comments and stated that there an mating micutiLumm to this particular type of business in that the nay of the business, Motto photo, does M dearly indicate that the services provided at the site also include a poitm audio,passport photos,dnd one hour;film processing. The applicant also indicated that the store front was 2S fed wide rsether than 20 feet as staff had bee$ told previously. Mr. Robillard then explatnad that this would deange leis reeommaadation slightly and based on the proposed criteria for the new sign ordinance would allow one 4 sq.ft.aeon sign for the shop. Committee Member Lavws stated that one neon sign for the store would be acceptable. Committee Member Weber stated that be would not support any signs except for maybe one neon sign. Chairperson HOKSic stated that he would support an neon sign of 4 sq.ft.with an additional 4 sq.ft.of vinyl or ® other type of lettering on the window. The Committee Members discussed the appropriate size of permanent window signs for the shop. it was decided that a 4 sq. & neon window sign in the lotion of the one4mur film prop%ft sigh would be r ,FT y . Wgb S nd 4 41 is am WOM be �oo On a 3-0vw,OPPlimfin 33-I1SAM wn 4PProwd Occufft tO 00 llndl4Pis the Model Resolution with Haft I MOMW and Condidw 10 added to Ual SS gawr 1' corium�. are whit Tick 17 of the d Code as kafo 10. The approval is for ODD(1)nt sip of 4 square fett located wheys ft oow4Ww film PUCUW hmald. An additional 4 mpmne feet of wWOw OP00�80 wider than 30 ink wig is with 6 inch high letters maybe placed in the same window paneand below the approved sign, 4. Iication 36•A�AC-92 Iialoer and 13�viQ[� .RequesOM WA w and landscape plait and for fbr Mm t0 a use permit for archit 10cmd at the Southwest corm of DeAm Boulevard and ftnestead Rod. 7`he so ig Tom on ofard explained.that the moons to the lands pbm ng y AW aad the addition of w for lam/ w01 be granted as a to the Use pennk with with the Ile also stated that the t pit is n with the Xai$cVe 0-9-exertion that the tmfwm ems 2P/.of the total l area. uldoMm Homestead Square, reviewed staff? and Members, q of the COlumillee Memba weber stated that b2th k Committee Membet Lawos steed the erne supp"L Chairperson)~loxde stated that he hid nD concerns with the wig but had some terns rdth the amouut Of the turf area being proposed, It was discussed among the Committee Membazs the WWiatgnm of the amount of t4: area. On a 3-0 vote aPplication 3&ASAC-92 was approved accordWS to thefmdiopand boas COMBnod in the Model Resolution with Finding I modified,Condition 9 mmodified,and Condition 10 added to read as Wovs+s: Fines 1 ape Gtiuidelirm as condWon herci Proposed Aanuqg and kaptica plan are in substandal°onformance with the CM o ndi ® 9. The approval is based upon the planting plan dam March 20, 1992 and irr*dm plaza dated Decongm 10, 1992 except as may be amend by the oandit=WnnoaWd herein. at�S aid i`n' APPRCIVAL QF ls � 5. b8i m=offt regular a g CfDMmzft 14,lye we appuwd with ft Cbmmittor McMhW LSVWS SWW dB dws M reoll staft the second amum atpantSM&S of IMM_l W d fcgUWM that it bn 19MOW& Also t3te fiW PuBgrgh an pp 2 to Vie: Cbmmftw her for dmW was be==tie buUng mid dgm WMW be big*vY Ltd ftpund alga would be am than what would now be allowed at any other site in do may, CXDMMi'd'l�RI�QRTS Commida umber Wd w asimd staffto took uga the nm wmdow signs at the Suer Craven Bogs Stom. Chafrpe M Kmade ashd Offto send the mmuto in ft FMIMI ofthe Sign OrMnarn Committee to ASAC. REPORT C)F STAIW Staff stated that the second stony addition an Wood mop Court was q prowd by City C.a and with a 47%floor area ratio. ADICIUPIeR' At 9:35 p.m.to the newt regular me*29 to be held on lannaay 25,M,7:30 p m.,Cie Room A. ® PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY, I` <VU ---� Thomas R. 'Robert ei Planner Et Arch. Site A�:vt.Committee ATTEST. 1 �1 4e� 000 MY Corns" City Clerk �:asacse�,iugt pAn� r��103�pM'&`�3 THE�ig�� .1�'p y�'t�3P�.�y�C PERTI M� ..,, �w. �,' I4L4, ......... .'APPROVAL s NMHt Ayi.U,rf3U6pd�['q �}�Y$�i'ig ls4'�/67�1 akYti��ryl��A`�,`G�d�d+FpY�i�S�y'i/��iq} 8i KTMAL 'fly 9v cVh�[Si�Jbi iL^m o Tim c&i�d^�6��i$c�LiSiii668� o FoR-iA Y 2s, 1993, ]F o DEED IN COMMENCE ROOM A,CITY EWXw AT 10300 TOIL AVE CUPgRTIRtO,CALEOM9A 95014 The meeting was ealfrd to orda at 7:33 F.K by RQX CALL Member Present: Haxsic, Weber,Tunis,FwHch Members Absent: Line Staff Present: '*leorms R Robillard„Planner it F®S1'PONEN,4FN°!'SAMP AID►JUSSTid/E TO TOR r��A OR�DFIIt -None MSMPt AtsID RBAL COMM�CA710N3 -None 9LECT QN OF OFFICERS- Committee Member Harris pointed out that all ASAC members need to be prjemt for an Election of Officers. On a 4-0 vote,item I was continued until all ASAC members are present. FORMAL REVIEW: 2. Applicatime ASAC 51908.2(Ameade0 Bilk Mire and Assoc, - g review and approval to modify planned development sign,proparn for an casting regional shWAS mail, looted on the West side of Wolfe Rd.bawcon Stevens Crook Blvd.and I-290. Torre JRobillard renewed staff emmeets noting did staf h main object w to the neon sign is that it is redundant,being close to the main wall sign facing Wolfe Rd. He noted that the main wall sign has 4 R. lush letters facing Wolfe Rd. The neon sign can also be seen fiam the soudoty direction of Wolfe Road. Wendy Norgaard and Wade McClure rep=Qmg Ross Dress for Less, explai od that the intent of the now sign is that it be seen from the parking lot to direct people to Ross. Committee Member Harris asked about a similar sign on the opposite side of Ross which can also be seen frrnn Wolfe Road. Mr.Robillard explained that he would look into that sign to verify whether or not it had been approved. Committee Member Weber stated that he felt that the now sign caused too many signs in one location. He stated the neon sign could be better used m a locations directed towards the parking lot rather than Wolfe Rd. Committee Member Harris agreed with staff comments and felt that the sign was i duplication of signs alroady in that location. A Jar Z5, 1993 Page-2- finftft Member Frolich sty be filt that the am sign was to man compared to v"s going ou M the is not ftmcfwc.and is useful to pedcsWans and pea&is ft pddfe kc ChaffPcMan Hoxde agreed with waff comments that ft sign is rednftt D-MS10N On a 3-1 vote with Committee Member Frolirh ion ASAC 31,908.2 was denied according to the findings and moons dined in the Model Resoludom APPROVAL OF MINiJTF.S On a 2-0 vote, with Committee Members Harris and Frolich abstaining, the minutes of the regular meetiog of January 11, 1993 were approved as submitted. CQNdRRITTEE RE O '!'S Committee Members Harris and Frolich asked questions of staff and the CommWee regarding ASAC and ASAC procedures. The Comm tt c discussed too City Council's disces ion of eliminating ASAC. The Connufte asked staff to provide a copy of the minutes of the City Council meeting when they discussed eliminating ASAC. Chairpersion Hoxsie and C.ommitbw Member Weber expressed can that ASAC°s 'on for Westfield Inc.parking garage was misreprese ad to the Planning Cmmissiom and City Council. They wanted it made elm that their reconmundation was for the original desk concept and not the revised dsmvmM of the oq&W deMp concept as prod by Plannut Director Cowan. Committee Member Weber asked to see the minutes of the January+ 11, 1993 Planning Commission nwaft and the Jamary 19. 1993 City CO=W meeting when this issue was discussed. REPORT OF STAFF -None AR OURINId M At 8:40 P.M.to due next regular meeting to be held on February 8, 1993,7:30 P.M.,Conference Room A. PRE RED BY: APPROVED BY. Thomas R.R illar'd Rob person Planner R Site Aprvl. Comte ATTES i D City Clerk ASAM=203 U3 s" t CITY OF CUBERTI p 10300 TORRE AVEIM CUl ERE N0.CALIFORNIA 95014(408)252-4505 NMglUTlES OF THE REGULAR NIEE'TING OF THE ARC.EIniFURAL AND STYE APPROVAL COACWTTEE OF THE CTTY OF CUPERTINO FOR FEBRUARY 8, 1993,METING HELD IN COIe1FEIMCE ROOM A,CITY HALL,AT 10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUFERTIINO,CALIFORNIA 95014 The meeting,was called to order at 7:30 P.M.by Chabperson Koxsie. DOII.14 CALL Membay Present: Hoxne, Weber,Harris,Frohch Members Absent: Lira Staff Prneat: Thomas R Robillard,Planner 11 WSTPDPtEMEN`l'S AND ADJ LT-V M TA Tn A% A®inDER •None VVDMM MM.*4%1tBAL COMMUMCATIONS Patsy Lueieowski expressed concern to ASAC regarding um in pang lots of several shopping off. She stated that the shopping centers were pruning their um so lwjv as to keep them as small as bushes. She asked if:he City could do anythi% Mr. Robillard explained that as long as the trees were kept in goal order that there was nothing the City could do. He stated that the reason the trees were trunmed so small was probably to maximize die�paddng lot lighting for the safety of thcir customers. He stated that he would be glad to provide Ms. L iewski with the names and addresses of the property owners of the shopping centers and she could write them regarding her concerns. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Agglicagion 26 ASAC•92 (modifie% James Sievers • Requesting review and approval for a planned development sign program for an existing restaurant located tit the Southwest corner of De Anza Blvd. and Alves Drive. On a 4-0 vote,the item was continued to the end of the meeting due to the ap hc&.A not being present. AEPkOVAL OF AMTFS 2. On a 4-0 vote, the minute ,of the regular meeting;of January 25, 1993 we.,--approved as amended. Committee Members Frolich and)Harris pointed cmt several typographical errors. Cmmuiftee Member Frolich pointed out that item 2,paragraph 2, last sentence should read... The neon sign can also be seen from the southerly direction of Wolfe. Rd. Paragraph 4 should read... Committee Member Harris asked about a similar sign on the opposite side of Ross which can also be seen from Wolfe Rd. "au in I WON AUCAUNUIS FComnium Member djM i rAW MMUEMURAM WP'Jw adwd siadfft StdOw_ with tic Pim lint ply nand. B`Vow4 an the . stating that ASAC wdl start mvig%* at the zadt,me9ftW 90 vW=SCd coOCern rcPnft the Paw awning on De Ana BEFORE'OF Mr. Robillard stated that do Ras Dms For Lem sign denial was appealed and will be heard at the February 15, 1993 City Council Committee Mlembers Fwhch and Ham stied that d wy would attend the meeting and commCM on ASAC's position. On a 4-0 vote,hm 1 was c094inaied to to nweftof February 22, 1993. ADdOUMMM At 8:10 PA-1.to am=a regdlat mecting to be hdd on February 22, 1993,7:30 P.M.,Co&reace Rom A. PREP BY. APPROVED RYY: owns R. bill W Planaar ll and Site Aprvt.Counnimm A Dorothy City Cleric r a low TMEA�IBB. hlIEltP 31w,R MRJU MEWG R A f`RNAL AM UM MMVAL OF TM C1`I'f OIL CLvmnm FM kg" Ey=IM MWMG CAIjFOR CIA M14 HELD IN CU ICR ROOM AT 1 A VW The movtiag was adled to onkc;-C: 7:33 P.M.by ChRhPWW HWMIC- KQIL Weber.LAM FwliC a Members Absent Harris Staff Prscnt: Thom R.Roblihm',Planner 11 PS�STI<':Dl�'EM11N'�AND Ad�*es > '1°D T1#E A A OR •None ::'P..�a a HAND VRIt113AI.�11CATIQNS -Now CONSENT 6;.',�NAAH 1. ;i, nn 2f- SAG-9Z {�,.�a �fines 5iavRcWxsftgnor and qVwW fia a glmmd dfvdQPw9Ut sign program fa an cxWjng reMlantlocated at the Sow ciorner dDe Am Blvd.and AWO Drive. 0 On a 4.0 M vote,the item was vemoved foam the Consent Cat - Chakyerson Roxde asked to see samples of the ldttering. Committee Member Weber asked to see the address numbaas placed an tb l 1111011UMOnt sign jam Sievers.applicant,stated that he was om=nW tbaL if the add=is plate an the sign it may cleteact£tntn the aesthetics of the sign. Mr.Robillard stated that the address numbers were going to be plae W an the bruit ng as required by ASAC 1wAou*• DctgWa vats.Apiplis tion 2ti-A5AC-92 was app3oved to the findings and motions contained in the Model Resolution with Condition 10 added to read as follows: Condition lo: Prior to installation of the sign staff along with the applicwv will More adAno AdreSs numbers on the gmund sign. FORA9A1.IEtEVIEW 2. Apgification $1,_.�__004,154 Heritage Tree Nomination: RWatmgappraval to dmguate a Coast Live Oak tree as a heritage tree in acoorda=with,Ordinance No. 1373. The tree is located at 22344 RWws*Drive. D i i n- findings and conditions contained in the Madel On a"vote, Application 81,W4.134 was approved a000rdirsg to the Resolution. PS ASAOMOMM 3. WVkW W d WWVjd of the QVItine, sip Oranance revision. Mora Rob>'llard reviewed do h sad scope Gfravkwefft Sign Ovdiamme Review Committem Cam Member Sletrer sed do be fact the Sip Otiluma was tivivards badness and dial he was mit happy with the Can Hoxsie a+eviMW the goats and objectim of the Sign Osdinam Review Committee and a&4mmd tin items which he felt were and were no addressed by the Committee. He asked if staff would have drawl'ugs and carts ready for the Sip Onfinance before it MA ASAC. Mt RoUbid stated that he would. Chairs Hoxsie suggested that m the special signs sec= that the square botage and heights of the various types of signs be,consistent. In Section 17.24.080,he felt the S,GD 4 fr.si c was too small Chairpaisan Hgxde stated that the design criteria in 17.24.230 did not go for enough to design criteria. He.gated in S 17.52.090,that it should be made dear tit a person guilty of an . c wld be fined for every day of the fiactisn as in vlolaf m of a code. The Commies agrd that the definition of illegal signs should be added back in. 7UCommitteediendiscassedhowto format,' document for presenMion to the Ong Commission and City Council while MeM the comments from ASAC and the Sign Review Commme A1.ROVA&OF MBiEM 4. On a 3-0 vote,with Committee Member Lim abodaing,the nri from the regular meeting of wary 8, 1993 were approved as amended as fallow&: Prior to atournment of the meeting:On a 4-0 vote,Item 1 was to the meeting of Fdnuary 22,1993. COZi�HKEPM Tom Robillard reviewed the action of the City Council regardmg the Ross Drm For Less sign. RWORP kF_STAFF -Now. A1D.10U1s1�Tli°IENT At 9:35 P.M.to the next regular meeting to be held on March 8, 1993,7:30 P.M.,Conferem Room A. PREP R31: APPROVED BY: //_1AA �— Thomas R Ro011ard Planner li and Site Approval Coma ittee ATTEST: Dow*_ City Clerk e r C .. .. S i.- 'rf: r.'ta .� t :':tici' IF,lFi r•ti -�-itt `rs i1.a: '.a[Y 1 a i >la�ttu I' ttI. t 1ta;•' IrNr I i ' A: N'It tl t: t: .t;llutslar� w t i'i ul [r:. rr 1Ahttgt ['11tr. r• -�A :1. .0 aac n! .0 �Ir r�' I to ,.a. :'i t.". :1- :+t,irtnart. fit: �;:[.,{ }-}• 1 •:rI tfyA) lets+ �`_:i). ' ' ar r -ai la• [ A: ►{h.-t h r,r _lt 't t`ut� (,.. 7 ur — .II I flf rf .t'i to a-J, i1---1 1.11•.4ff 1;'2 1 lut 1.1 Y•r 'nt. rA.0!. u.[: t r. �JI =!,x'tl:M1t'•" rtutuA a,tn�l L.t .t,- r- 1 I.11 it 1`7 r •tt.Il:ti'-ir,t {.• ;r r•IJ t. - 'IJ: fA •1l. :� + 11:.A 1`..•. t 1 r'.: i 1.iq t{•,1I I+:J f✓, ;.i , 11+'.-'i IMI.. a =1 It 1 1 }.;.1. -1 {...lit 1K1a,: L! h•I itt-1 t.P -a` of-' •[Iit I1.:�r 1�_ 'A 1.11.1 4i•- litil i'i l' P I'ii ta. 4 v it•.w'' D' t} 1`! is 1. 'f.1'r..i K' lM '".i 1),;Y I1, .'1::. 'llitltl ti'1.[.: 8.-!.s•1. It. :.•r -1' *tl.1 t -41 t-11:�:' {l: ilY_.`:v-M1 til } t ... y1111111 Fill •tl l 1I'l l l A4 r176'1 1777,l-11. - �!Y.�!•1'-•: r.•. -11;-f.. .1�. '17 1.' •; t-J:1 r1.=. �.. -t: r. �.t. 1." t{' S.;-lt. =I(1. L i'. .tt✓.; S Kttd.l,TT— i,i l' r y [ - ►1 1.1` al:t M1 ":'ri 'Y 1'. 1 1 r�.Ir..' I, i III.M.%i'Ill. '1 'r:. •t I u N tt is .M14 ✓tr tJll; A . -�: - 1- a JI il' !'-- 1 I "•�,=, ;.:1,J-t.1.:• r•.•1=t t:. .' .• 'i I. a it.i •i i,•=1. I,.-.t r: '...1' lt: i�..'1:t-1 tt' :t 1..=!" 1,;'l irltl ll�l M: fy. 1 II II.'�1� - 1.1.1%i ^1�-{•.(«.`.- t :1,ft 1",,(:- =ari. :f .1 nL=�:1 1 t •1 :rAr 1 ;Li A :It %11,Y ••"1. - 1 7 ' ' t 1 I it at ry M1I t. x r ar� [;•[a.i ,t. .. 9III I il I Y =i 11Y 'a' IWTI'J I i.t Ar:1 '.A.fl• "JS.-..� 1 `. '.11✓a l'1:.[ 1)3. I A '.ia'16N':`�':-7C: ,Yia L1. l-el '1.:. ttr. (.. - tf, .t �alpg4,a.4711: 7 t.4 [+i-s 't�4ti {fl L 7-.: �i'�f 1.It• . ".r. 1 I.. 1.." r I1.'.Il l'1 - •1'*1 �-tll.:•-11"[ i't I'1;17 Y'I.-r,.w l::tll't';� '�I�i ll' 1. 7':" 't 'sr'1 i 1.•.' . I 1-.1 1r7 XVr.'Iml 1P 1 / F`�� :r-:;f r Xy"; �i�a s2..s:. ��, "^� "� �e f:d� .a¢.�a.1 4*„•� `�.ar�sg�\�135�•ir At . i :' ! lilt:}i rf:Ir Y "i1n i- :'La• :, 1 Ja .i a lux 11!:•11T' -t k*:`-i'�311 f T;��111 Y'; �t•-t t'= .. ..•:'1:-, f}`:1...1� G.: '�'1'i:I',f ,:: 1:. :ti,-^1 4,f1.. ::+:;i a:l':1.•:1-:i' ;1:`.IIY:- :}I'.t ._ 1)tT'it l[I[-.:. -5ii i-!: t'.1;«7 :•.}:11.•.T `I lt`: /.. 1-+i'•Tt ltT•S.l l+ 7 !ititrl [A., J ;MJ,•c.,.i �':- fl}}J;;-..{7,y;t ii :1:. lid w st. •t :q.-..•l "-.1 1'dL-17G`i3iP " 1-1l:lll '1 111'�•+ al • �{ ,i l .1"t-;tlf 1 :1-�11. •1: '..i-t 7.' •1':.• ,H :�vJ �-1. -45 1: ltllti 1"µ .t f•- {YlllilP •::'al 11 ".'J A7l'4b E. a-Y/. tF �Y- 11111tt-1 i.b i. t•'t1.='i 535. yA l' I4 j ;i-at '. tlf7l11iil:Y IY t- 11711(fJ:117 AIL i:• K t:! '4`_7� :'•I..IiC I.t.t -rJ t)1 1- 1 1'}to '�:/ . :xl ,t 4 t l «.t:uJJ 1131 •rn ? 1:11Lt 1':11,:-: t•5v! 1 1' •IJtlti y.all 1. Iflilt:.i. ! ,l3' `'. - fT. t.'-'t , , �:/!ITY(1 '•� 13 �-•I15= }'.1 � 1:-f'F:II. 11.11,�1 /'1 '1 } .1` .'tt'> 11:4.•dli tl. 1 t t flltx lT Ji-. f - .tt;::, 1 :It :ii P; 1 : 1 f •{ .{'� 1 11 t.;I.itftl 1 1 If" 1 1: . � ':�. 1•' ,1"� ,, l: 1 nJ�'ars.: '• ,Ina 11.•�.:a 1.I 1 . l nw{ •11. ,,1'Tit l s di=i i a • 11 , i �• ♦i .`�• .aA ,..1. "r. f." F' '-J': .T. ,a .�..�.ttl ;,1 �i'; ::v: ..i• .i8'�Y j':: C , 1.=� r a �� i- +' :A �� a e; , ;W" rc.ia '+;tt• ' 1"- .!� ;. t*-:�.•°�€ ;. : ;l'ra3' (; t t • i.= 'f}'.�•!..i 11. '.I:. _.-; i `,- ;. -� t;{ :l �11Ci1'{.+':l...I:t r.Y3=1a� - -Prl Alt .. •?f l :}n.�1:N--k If111r A M. It `i}:1 A. -�"-ilY I:e SP:I#:1: -t5-'. :7 f. '-i:t�i/•r: .�, It W.W IJINIW I'll, ,.� , ..,� �1 at;l•' fit. �T' _:�:.'1!k=.Y_Y�k�:�.>,ll�" ;si+ :{: .� �'h�.lt x. .i ,•7:;�"y c cr 1 -^lI J. II •:� J l` r -�'-3P- --1:' Ulr Fll}II Ir •P;t Ttc1I>a n ''t:'a+: sa19 L i;f: -sd't l f"t• �s.c�.itf.;-.,YJt.. 2:_ -'_ �ty�l �srri�f� .Ifl -;y} I� - :.Prig ai°ri i t' $rt d4', itits>sn - li+! f.11 «:11 il.f; i ,II -�`f SCYI `-1 :`!Y.0 flt. :.ram:rJ:;i�. Ct i.- .it.�-i'.1.•• '+f)l.=t i3" #�Y- .tt �! %E7:J .P' :1'i J. -•1-h.f -.i" li tl- •"t.1 : -1� -1 1:' .'!f:l l' +:i.11tilt.-SitL• .1�5-:i it`. _a'I' •Y..li .11i1 �l}I..�-a I .N It, 1«-fti' li UCt,illl i! Y.I G1. ✓.i7 { ' " t -}r.:ilk�, I I=,a7. lit�•S U: nc.311.i i 1 "-! c i-.1 i-I fIW4 tjW-1 1'-avotll flit•I I.' '.i iWll 1- -iSl ill i... f.} it.. tliir}i '.a'lf";till f; ";.+ •f i?y.:r- JII.i I1.1` .II_f" Slfial' 1.+'l A 1. i -t :11'liil - • 1..-f. "1':1 I.,' -i'i.�.141.•- IS t•'M1- •:f li 11 Lr 'I � ?I1 %? � �N"d: ;11:.IE:-:+� i.f l li�i. I .II t I- :.•1.i'1. { 11. .p',1, :.Lt r 111 w .II-f "✓..kl 1-' �1 V.tf . •`i i'- - ,I • fi.•11 i" Ii rq .J1.'.-1H1 t! :I II,1 c;.11 i'I :.It ti C 11- i• •0-7. J 6 r, •1(I- 'L' :1. l.. �1.: -.�. 11-fi'i '".'it t C.rlli lir a 7L1 r1 '1 1 1�'. P i ✓,:LI L, 'v 116- :.Lt.r:'i' i :If t �yl'j; 'X.. pK �;,ll �1 ' 1 t .F:t.t"'d , I,t `1.,: :..,•t r;dk.�1 .P t 1. H •.I: ,.,1. 1 f' snr n. •--:• :,-.«.-..t is -liti • 1 .. - r ' ,- '::i:'a '-1: - :.:_1 •rI.1 a„i f 1 : IaIll is i a, ASACM Manh 22, I I'll Tom..Rabiffaid handed m the pertinent smdons of the Draft General Ftm and the Draft Environmental Its Rcpwt for ASAC,review. He vWnW do the ASAC members may review dw documents and submit commub He 91ted W the fart dwumcm will be made wailabb to any ASAC member at their aqua . Lastly,he Stated 09 this iOW will be Fly on the April M 1993 ASAC agenda. CQ+ll"OrMB It Committed member Weber expressed came regarding the own signs at Pro Hut and Crown Books. Commiuve Member Harris expressed concern rqplftg the orange awning at the PETCO building. Committee ndember Fralich questioned staff actions regarding the orange awning at the PETCO building- Lim cWcssed concern agardio-an address numbers for Marisa Foods. He stated the numbers are a Bandley Drive addreo-a and sot a Stevens Creek Boulevard address for which they Sce. FOR REVIEW 2. &uplication 81. 004,120 Sign Or�j&-Me(Rev130d)-Review and approval of the Cupertino Sign OrUnanae WWsion. Tb_. Committee Members reviewed the changes which were made at the L-A meeting and made the following ,moons: 17.04.020. Purpose and Latent-Sub-60clion C-add a number 6 to state...Be attractive Mon a citizens point of view. 17.24.060- Wall Sign Size- Sub mmon A.crass the smteno which states... Each basins shall be allowed a minimum 20 square foal sign Sub4action B,item 1 to statd... 18 inches for signs setback 50 kd or h= item 2 to state... 24 inches for sips soft&more than 30 fad for business with 3,000 square feet or more rem of the item 3 to ate... 36 inches for signs setback more than 100 feet for busies of 10,000 square feet or maw,item 4 to state..48 inches for signs more than 100 feel for businesm of 20,000 square feet or more. 17.24.130- Ground Sims: information Cozutainad-Sub�ion S-shed address numbers for the range of numbers for businesses shall be clearly displayed on the ground sip for easy vis%ihW for by passing motorists. If no g owid sign eat, the sow address no uber or range shall be clearly displayed on the bmitdin& Street address numbers shall be a minimum of S ids high as required by section 16.04.050 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. The Committee teen discussed the review procedure for die Sign Ordinance. They discussed having an annual review and a 3 year review to be done by the director of Community Development and to send a report to the City Council as to whether or not a public hearing should take place. Mr.Rabilhod stated that he would discuss this issue with the Planning Director and City Attorney to determine whether it would be appropriate in the Ordinance or not. The Committee then reviewed other portions of the ordinansoe and made the following changes: Under "Cornea triangle",delete the description of uncontmW intersections and refer it to Appendix A which will contain a copy of C<upertim, Standard Detail 74. Thuy stated that else same should be done for the "Sidewalk site triangle°and simply refer to Appendix A wa.:r-h will contain Cupertino Surd Detail 7.6. ASACAMM at sips e •. �C than tam 1%12:11t1 ve� f -Cf Section Wft 17.24-M aad 17.31110. d ail be 1E►tha7�•1�WWft ��rs�... a=of air 17.24.090 and tootaWmpomy sban Vat mooed of,�o vdvdSW win&w by EvW=x to ft CbWL 17.32.M sesviw. JAU 1124.M,ft COMMIM dhOOMdthe 32 Sstompfix,v to be ofa dp gmd 8 A.ft was mare Were Maltby do Dinctoratcommunity Mr.RobgWd then exPlaicI'4 the pie of the memo sib go tbm pr��which he felt ASAC shanld addrem to 11irWof Of Community . �effi • w,,,,� d with lefed -- of Director. a+^�J ar. de d"to 1�item 2 BMI&S oficad and Plaa>=to Dit ►hm s W to UM men 17.24.030 E,as is and add alone. makethe tag 3 and item qned by ilte Dicer% 'MY ag=PW" an additionral item to state.••Of by toe f 17.24.090. Iton 9 and 10,tt�q dcoided to change in item 6. Rom 7 and w leave as ia. I*gaW thaz Cammm Member an FretidA��ed his veasl�i oaf the Sight Otdinam to the as the%pl Ordus=m he sM'AD his vet of the Sign stated be is these to win. rawa.� the erne or a+o *ft CommW% C r 1lards stated that she fd1 that C Member Fmlich's version wanld bdittle tlta efforts whasd,have been tataea 1 a by the Saga tDtdinaatce and ASAC. wouhl be w to look at C;o =Ww M Fmlib's 'ons Commt�Members Weberand wotabd aft at if it waswri n a bow- ►• as teat$as them were no CbWtpm=lam slated that he felt the same sq. He stated that the Comminwd=W take a doter bole at COMMIM Member frua h's version of the At Ibis time(9:45)09110M Lim kR. 3. on a 4-0 vW,,with�1m a�nl'ttm'' a[tb a reFW of B,1993 wore�as submitted. At 10:15 P.M.to the need regular to be held on AFrat 12, 1993,7:30 P.M.,Coa►ferenoe 1tGOm A APPROVED R.ltobillard Aicbu%jorgand Planner II A G . City Clesk s . _ CITY OF CUP TINO 10300 TiORRE2M.M.20M.- .CelL 1gFA 9IOP4(4M 2S2a4�S S�'13�BRR Off' ARCHrnXMMAL AND RM APPROVAL COMMUM OF THE CITY OF CIJPWWO FOR AFR&It 1"3,MEMWO HEM 1N COd+}'PiMCE ROOM A.Cfff RAU.,, AT 10300 7 Ma M C i 3 M M C.M..Z.M.M.A 9g014 The meefing was cn:;i to order at 7.34 P.M,by Chairperson LiaL ROLL ff.�. Members Present Hmft HwIk FwHe4 Linn Member absent Weber Staff Present: Thomas Planner 11 POSMON W—M AND Aamunm=MM.r.Ey;;M..�.."a. On a 4.0 vote,the Commaw agreed to hear.the New Busnessitem first and move item one alter item toter. MmIr ANIMAL C�MtaiilNt��rrnmr� -None FO :•� VIEW:Neer Badwn 2) Application 3-ASAL-93 Wen Coast Sign Co. •Requesting mvkw and approval to mot a ply ® development Mg,p�'�for a bank locate on the North aide of Sttveas Cnvk Blvd app mmaWy 122&Wept of De Anna.81vd. Tom ltobillard mviewed flee staff comments and notaal haw the proposed sign pwgram implies with the proposed Sign Ordinance. He stated that he made an error on fibs square footage calculation for the round sign in the staff mport. Mitchell Franklin, West Coast Sign Co., aamwal staff ommeds and answered questions of the Con mifte M mbers. lb clarified the size and height of tine aigas. Committee Member Hoxm"that the emus-sore acceptable. C0nmUttea Member Harris stated that sbe felt the number and sip of signs was acceptable. Chairperson lam rated that the adds=numbers should be placed on the ground sighs. Committee Member Frolich questioned the comparison of the proposed Sign Ordmanee, the mstmg Sign Ordinam and the proposed Sign Program. Dads gg OH a " vote Application 3 ASAC-93, was approved aging to the &dlqpandWW. contained in the Model Resolution with Conditions 1 and 2 added to read as follows: C°n 1. Five inch high rnWrmw address numbers sW be places on the ground sign ASAC MUMS PR 2. 110 mchmm of*e,sip cabinet shall be is inokes. Sigh Syss- r and WWW to a Ply 3) Applic3dmi 44SAC-93 Superiorat the N c ee of Stevens Crack . development 6P prwgeaan of as exist bank located and Wolfe Road. Tom Rabiltard reviewed the staff notih�g teat be "� the scope RdAllard of the proposed dg stud PrOSMOL �,wo she applicant,aft"the staff repo'was ,Torn sip he would c1Lge his �denial to good. tie sty that � an she propried ground signs would be coRmstent color with the,color of all odh�r tenant name and�she seal color for the wall signs was an amble color. TOMMS Cht�Basin,Eureka Bank,Earl Gbbings,Superior Sign'- and Charles P the land owner,reviewed staff comments and answered questiow of Camnumn Members. CommiM Member Frolich gnesbio�d diecomparw of ft pwposed and Seri and proposed changes tothe sip program;and SWA that do pwVoW vwas * questioned the colors, y wi= P n0d to siges of Cr,w Member Harris and colors in the car. She stated that sle fel3 that there wereo many Seri®r direr mf mational �, of sire COIRIAW Member Hoxsies gar�orn regatdmS doe ongPhat! ten wasting Newman. t°mounted Ma. He sta d that the wer sqp e�by the CIP/ xistir�budding years ago,in order to help ftc&Mec tienam needs for stated if CommitwMembor Hoxsie s first since dx SW are he will support it. Bethat tated this wars a now program be would not support it Chairperson T.Lm stated the sign proposal vwas ale. On011 On a 4.0 vote,�yplication 4-ASAC 93 was approved according to the and condom c in the Model Resolution- rMew and appwW for=himd�a'a1 design of 4) Application 5-SA Richard t terted on the West mUo ,Ann Way. a single familyhome Use paud corrditam require that ASAC wvww d0 Planner Ytobillard ercplai�the Seven SpringsDQCO*y Affii Way. He that architectural and site layait of the caiston4 lots ore Stauffer azce w� � of she the Pmp°� house s all the r� returned to ASAC prior to issuance of landscaping design. He sh WSW that the 10016 0 ca 16 d but die site and architeataral building P as the landscaping does not of ' City Council ` " design does. He sagWAW shot ASAC apprM do at this tinge. Richard Hartman, project architect and Chris and Cindy Hwy, Ate' owners, reN staff comments and answered questions of rho Committm Members. Commii'.ee Member Harris stated that the application was acceptable. Aw ASAC Rl nutes 4-UM Commium gibed Hoxwe questioned whether the walnut tree is on use applies property and whether it will be saved or noL ng appHc=stated that they were under the 'unpresdou that the wait two was not on their property; but if so,they would retain the tree. Comma Member Hods stated that he felt the pry base is a good design. Cc nnume Member Frahc h questioned the laadscal►mg plan and where the trees would be placed. Committee Member Lim stated that the house is a good design. On a 4.0 vote,application 5-ASAC-93 was approved acwfft to the fiuft and conditions contained in the Model Resohation, FORMAT.RHVIEW:Ole!Buw- s 1) ASAC 81,004.120 Sim Onfinance revised. Review and approval of the Cupertino Sign Owe revision. Conunme Member Harris stated tiaat she had two issues to consWer. 1) She felt the bet&of sighs being S feet was to bigb;and 2) That we should make provisions to allow For a second wall sign if ant facing the public right-of-way but facing a parlwg lit or Oder shops. After discussion between flue Comfew members, Ciouninee Member Harris agreed that S feet was acceptable. The Commmc Members agreed*a there sbm:d be a prmsime in sectim 17-24.050 to allow second wall signs if they are not racing the public q&-d way, but face parking tots or other shops. After discussion of this issue,Planner Robillard suggested that he rewrite this Sew and return it for ASAC review. Committee Member Harris asked Planner Robillard what he fiwnd out regarding periodic review if the Sign OMmance. Planner Robillard responded that after wscussmg dais issue with the Planning Director that placing a periodic review requirement in the Sign Ordinance is not the most apprc>lariate answer and suggest that ASAC send a Minute Order to City Council requesting that the Sign Ordinances be reviewed on a periodic basis. Committea Member Frokch stag that he felt that a should be in the Ordinance. Cbairpersma Lim and Committee Members Home and Harris,stated than they were comfortable with a Minute Order. Comnittee Member Hum moved to approve the Side OWmance with the suggested changes made ® previous to this time. The motion died for lack of a second. •1 ASAC Mlmutes 4-VA3 chairpersonum addressed several of his comments. 'tom being 1) 1b felt the order of sign nguhWons in Chapter 17.24 should be reordered,in a4ftbstscal order so that E#rd Sign specificadons would be first, Wall San specifications would be second and Window Sign specifications would be third. Planner ltoblIkA sib that the ream Sur having Wall Signs first in flee Ordinance and G=W Sign soccIA is that every business is allowed Wall Sigars, where as, Ground Signs are only allowed under certain criteria. After discussuig this issue,the conmutto Members decided that the existing format of this Chapter is acceptable- Next, Chairperson lama addressed section 17.24.090. W shod that this serer should be labeled for Pr*ectioos of signs and that it is a bit Musing on how the Sign Or&wance regulates rough mountd sips. M stated do section 17.24.200f should be removed and placed in 17.24.090. cmmmcmkmbmamosseddwconoqmofwdsigns=dwhWwftsbmWbeWkwWoram it was agreed auwg the Committee Members that roof signs should mot be allowed and that it should be plot in flee Frobibitd Signs Chapter 17.20. The majority of the mermbe-n agreed d a t roof signs tend to be tadW and not anchivmcbrrally integrated. ® Committee Member Frolich disagreed- Chairperson, Lama asked float a fiwther example be placed WO the appedm des 009 how to use diffino fo=W, mpfed m fie Oydmanre,such as,how to figure haw much Vaud mp area a sib would be allowed. Chairperson Lam suggesmi, father changes ton section 1724.060 and 17.24.090,stating that they should be combined wig sew 17.24.060A be rewritten to read; For all commercial businesses or buildings and industrial districts wall signs shall not. . . Section 13 remains as wrist®and sec&m C to be added to rid,Wail Sign that are internally illuminated shall be designed in a manor so that the H&source is not directly visible. Neon lighting used m an ktterimg doh or ac cm of any wall sign shall require approval f om the Architectural and Site Approval Committec. -Fhe Commaec Members discussed this issue and agreed in concept of Chairman.Lim's Napstim Chairperson Jinni also suggested fiat section 17.24.100 should be rewritfn as follows: 1"itld: Widow Signs-Section A) Window signs shall be permitted for all free standing commercial businesses and in all roam ercial districts. B) Window signs intended to be our display for more than 30 days sb-11 be considered wuww signs and shall be conmdereed part of the tonal allowable wall sign area as permitted in section 17.24.060. C) Should read the same as Subsection B; D) Fad commercial business may be permitted up to 4 square feet of neon sign IU C.onmittce Members discussed this suggestion.and agreed in concept. Lastly,Com mmee Member Lim stated that office districts should be allowed internally and if so ties section 17.24.160 should be eliminated and all sections regarding ground signs should bc rewritten to inclink office and institutiord districts and section 17.24.070 clirni nate the refuence to not allowing internally illuminated signs. n i i. 1'.;.1J(11'ISf�:. r{7:3 t.:.a.:. ii v.i a�Y. 1-. /1l< mil=u.- 1! ='1If fi ,✓1.'t ILY....[ 1. ' isi} � i'll:}Ylf;r. '-.1-t. 'l r.:�l. - C . ;,;j -.r.. .,.f.: 1 ^.is Ir7i'.� -�r �u-t. .�•{I r._sli.!s�. t _.x cl�'., �I_1 .11 fill'.1 y:�a ' r it... /,1. 11.1.q 1;IA l-I II'i/> :.:1'1 Yi. vf.7 / t!:1•.'7 'li:�i' F1. ..!'l: .t ii IS'Wa .-i•'Y. L It 6i'.Via.. :,,it'1 f K i<i(. t[1{r'f.li111t, 1.,:-.f. '..:I .{1} �s.f3 f-.r ♦:1. :17- >:; 1i1'1. I i' .'.III',%f:. . ..1 '.. :1' i'+,l f3-I�:Y �:I1 r:" 1. 1.: .:j fY. 1Y{ r`• '1'-Ili /„114t" 1.1- .:: Y31t 'If-ii1" �( 1=.;i F..-:t '.e smillo-. =f 11 i ti f, n ' 1f 3 rYir! rr i1, ..I .yi.L kf,—Ill ! :aV, It, 1333Y7ll i = p:. s.�:.�.If=i✓ f 1 S, y ' Iit•.{'J ,v 1 a:dl 1 'J`i=t ii1; :i i;,. i } 1 - . K41' NlAu 1.:, p t J. it I All �Y'- „may .•a: 1 alrl -1 9'I K iFl ill. «i+:a.t. ea,ss4 !i'- •!,• rtl:lt.t.t-> :u ulu:rl a. .a.{ • ,i}I ✓il R,C 1 " < - - ♦- Y: :.`1 17 CT=} '..al:la ]1 .f,.. :tlb 1 •l�Jl y1.i_:7;.J rS '.1'. .r! K�:'SAIl+: {'t t If= ,1 w,is+t S.l 1�• .} S" `.(wi.l'. ftl - [Y. 1'- II i:. w(11 S;•' '1:� I`. it l: :11':i 1.v.t:f.L•1 .k'. I.1:.1 -..-1. 1Y I i -+!1.1 - am' 1 AJ I �1V "I.1 l.•: �L" . �. 'r1.4r.ri.r-' •a } ._I Clr- v1:1 i'1 i':•,lE:t a:1 t•I ,r?:r[.a 7..1;I-1. I,I11, rg117f9T yj .✓.i rll.%} � 1„ 1 !.•lrt.,.� ,: i 11 ! t r .-! : arrJl.•. Y,171 Jr.l: . t. C,t .•. I '1,'. iy/r$ aC.•.-ti ,1�.. -. .:.�1:1 L�t !li` 1 1 11�.+p�- •:it y,- . f•Jfl(�1 1. 1 Ia.YI. ..Ili• �.1.. 1 1., dl_ 1 1 YN 1..:1�. 11 i.1!'i:Gi.. 1: L111r1Y ai' l d J�' •;{. 11! `t Nl1.-1 'YP.0 IJ 11.' 11.,` 1� v114l I11 l!"- il. 1 iltru 1 aF{.,a -2- Mm Cminittee Members ffiscussed this ismhre and the issue 19M in FUML Tt VW suggested that Chairperson, loam meet with Dam Stamm to rasoh,the if$m. It wn a pus that the ferr very disappointed that nobody fmw the Chamber of C the Meeting in order to discuss the issuer. All Camittee Metes fift 9=it was impertant thud ASAC and the Chaniba t OWO their difflunces and pnsent to COund all ordinance which has been ally too by Ccmnmittee Members decided that they would,am last time,have each Cornmittee Member address anyoutstandingitems which they felt wereimportauttodiscuss. Committee Member Hoxsie felt do the owe was acceptable as is. CommiftoMember Weber stated that he disWood with Swoon 17.24.100 staring that a minimm of 200 feet of fide should be requhv& He&Wgraod with Section 17.24.110 sag 919 the mwdu urm height of a sign should be h feet rather than S f xt. He disagreed with Sew 1724.120 stating that 5 town names were too many. With Section 17.24.170 he felt that Section Al shy be eliminated. MwCommanMembm discussed this item agreeing to she Al,make A2 sewn B and reletter the subsequent sabous. The last She in seams A should read; Signs may b c WOMW to the freeway subject to approval of the Arcb banal and Site Approval Cam• Section B s1kmId state; Signs must be intended for Company Mcgificalim purposes only;be building mounted and Cagy not e the sire limitations for kidding odd� P IW in the title. cruet far identification purposes shall be kept as smtple as passible t0 ai�md clutter and to aid the legibility of the signs . Lastly,he stated that in SeChm 17.24.090, subsection B and section 17.32.100 subsection B,should both read the saw IU Members agreed that bath sections should read as follows: The total area of any window obscured by any combination of permanent and temporarY window signs shall not exceed 25%of the window surface. Coo mittee Member Harris asked staff whether the suggestion by Chairimmm L k reordering the sections in Chapter 24,had been done. Afwr some discussion, Planner Robillard stated he had slightly misunderstood the intent of the Conwiaee and would correct it. Committee Member Harris stated that she felt internal directory signs should be regulated in some form. ,no Committee Members discussed this issue and it was agreed upon that the issue is covered in Chapter 17.16 regarding exempt sib. 1< was agreed that Section A should deal with directory signs only and directional signs are covered under Section E. Committer Member Frolich stated that he disagrees with Swum 17.12.030 requiring ASAC's review of Electronic Reader Board signs, freeway oriented signs, decative statuary► and neon lighting. Section 17.12.100,subsection B,ability Should be champed to a 5'• -The Committee Members agreed to that change. u�a shoug be � bbothib ad tw 6,0 ` than miduad awl es# mtd ss�a s%of l •I Zak as s�av F.he s�tit ASAC all that ft foof 17.24.1�f,Samcdon lag tM should be dew. 'lie Commim Manbas agreed• M 17.20.010, F raaof sEated 'I lae C �y and allow • S 17.24.tf50, the h d a� to d-aWy the of 04 A� ' . subsection A, ft CamdUm w anW emmutm members agreed wit&the Excqpt for mdonfial dhibicts each bum slH be pamaed am wag SW abed to their Premises. 1n seetm R,cbmW eachto any. coamnismMeaaa m Frolich stated that Sadon 17.24.060 wOS " � Od wislmed that to be elegy better• 'lam ated that setb A as Y as bows fsmn� F i� and awed to leave as it is. ii vase agreed amm the C aAWawa lefmmffm prqperty lire and dimW staff to delcde any► whams contadicted that_ chakpmm Than stated that in Sag m 17.24.060 there was soave canted amsf8 wh7ch wem at the pwmw meemg• Plaamer Robillaad sad that he iafmWOCCUOY left the C Drat vahiclt is stated in the Cho lam tla aerate in the Appadx means that Appgn&A3 should be Ap A8 �Fle of cmucted fang office ad Wag""lids h the 701%m of t0 Wall sWs slued he The C Mks&cussed.Agp®dm A9 ad asked staff to omkv smo c M.6ers was to '.M..*0 neon to the of May to,e 1993 in order for Chairf e ljm to atoms¢with John Stanton to discos*e OutMnft Lssm. 1, On a 5-0 vote,COMRAW Members comfmued the item to the mccfmg of May 10, 1993 doe to the aploiic ant not being presem• INFOgciv`�'` nmerrcaau• ntel 1$aa�iaaes9 3. Cats on the Dmtia General Pion and DEIR. C Member Harris asked the other Ca»ttee P wl ' waaatsd to submit asaC amp a s f N Wanda PM MWcam CamftoW AEEBQ AIG QE NMEM 4. On a 4.0 vim,vdth CmMhW Mmbcr Weber domWuWof ftuVdar mwftof April 12,1993 qpwvcd as obmftM& COMN ARi9'1' E RE�3 Member Noatie asked staff to look iota haves addum mmbm ,placed at tie Oaks Cent and.Pacific Fres& lb also asked stall:tO 100k WtO the GDIM Offt94M far om Beach stating that tag►do not appear to conform vA&the sip prqpm cmmm Mier webef asks smffto look into StMYS BWYCI=Sign On tlra si'do of dw dekveay vehicle. He,also asked staff to lwk into*0 temgorasy sign at the Mado Ply which has been up for apply S Membr Harm asked staff what was being din 69 Symoto Eak an Soll De Affix B.Wva�d regarding the hg o. TheCumnimegMM&O that the H&ing oo tho balding vm a safeEy haWd as it V slag&Ccwy into the stet The Ian rqpmud an the MaWs hmdmm ® A�DURNMEI�T At 10:25 p.m.to the nest apilar mocog of May 10. 1993,9:30 per.,Cmfmm Room A• PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: ium ms R.Robillaed �d Site A�C�itUee Planter 11 A'1TES Ila City Clerk � dyfwAM c CifY or Cu tB?>la � l A al =�Ali! aA1 +' + ) WWWWIMBEGULARM3 !' 'M ARCINISCIANIAL AND Slid APPROVAL COMMU E tp MM CrrY cr CUP==FCRMAY 10. IM. HUDIN ROOM A, AT I # IM Sja' � 950I4-The ruing was card to order a 7.35 P.M.by We ChdW=W ROLL.ICAU Mew Regent: wed,Hwaik Hmres Committee Member Lim arrived at 9:35 pm. Members Ate: Fidicb Staff Prewa Tlmsnas R Planner 11 POS i`MOPtEM"n AN��D SiTi 'F37"3 T °�'�AGELl11lA�AIE�3ER -None N AlFtli�RHAL C+D14QN�LCA`1TQii1S •None R®RAItAL ttEaillil;�V` 19ta[ '1) AliNAM AMC II U-9►0QWggn ggW= &MM RcWcgingreview and approval for a plate dmvlopmm sign prop m far a new offiwIR&D/Womercial CWTIex.Tbo site is loci at the Southeast quadrant of 1.290 and Dc Arm Blvd. Tram Robillard reviewed staff=nunents noting that do to ft mv4w naW a of the dwdopinak the numbered signs being prnpWW are qWWtau and meet ft spirit and agent of both the existing and proposed sign wftanees. He gated do signs A, B and one C sip are the only signs visible to the public right-of gray. Ail aver signs are interinal to the project. Jamie June Horton,Cupertino Gateway Pats,presented flees overA site Sign program. She reviewed the design concept of each she and reviewed the bist mcal badWound of the sign damp Committee Member Harm daw hat she was concerned with tie height of sign B and deaf She prefers the taller scale radw ban the wider sCale of C signs. In response to Conmn;ttee Member Hoxne's question, Mr. Robdiard explained that under the existing and proposed ordinance does site would only be allowed only two nxmument signs. Conguittee Member Hox=stated that the two A signs on Mariann Avenue Slrould be soled down. He stated that a diet solution should be provided for sign B. He stated that it does not work in tie overall design oonc%4 of the project;do it clashes with Sign A due to its design and cloSeneSS and that the tenant names should fit wdbin the sign rather d= "bein ° dre sign. He stated fiat he WW the overall design concept of the sign program;stating that IV felt dmt dw C signs were very nice but Sign C-6 seemed a bit tall for being so close to Mariam Avenue. t .l4 w-.1 M r6.1 ..S.d Y).•T I °s jq • - 0.( } it'kT! t'_/ 1 1 Y `,t 81 ^.� "l 91 +i6i i-.� '.-.K b itz 1+}'-• 4: t 'nr •mot t i.'•( ..if..t• te_Itra- 2J f • - 1 -fi-7 :� t 1 A.-:- {.L 1 /i � ,.,ri:; t i •a. I '.t'4�+t _ - ..Y: vt J•Aft. .A.i )'- ',yF'. �3. r �.. 9-• i I'n i.1-� It irf f j'.. 9 s�A f It�.0= •{d 1..1..-<. '91k. _ 'r yi-K/ TJi:= # U-i .{•.{.t :. ,:'{I •";: "w9 i .-i.-._t v f, ty, -( .,L.jS .h if J.itiifr.. '1 t_t.' li• is t,7J f. :.i l'i ...• •1.1,''.:. it ('�. 1-• :{1:�.: afi ✓, .2.�f: ri'fFIF!:1..2 fl: :l,t`N. i.+ x-.) f1.F:. TL l±'1 .i179,. ii,•-t; � .y +. 311.. h G .YY"t }•',1..1, tV: .ii 1:}••t x- ' 2�:J Y:•l i. v,•.-•t ia.e -f1.!'. %t•}1 ,.f- (,r( %itb ] rlll;tl`.- i i Yta.att. nrtl' s Jl.t=1 •.}0• Y., ,i_ t. � .Y7.- Y-Y.tl"rh '1✓.-1 "f-" 0'-=f = :1 tt{ 'i - a t:fll It 1.113= '"ii t'i t. ,xt?71. %i 1.1 YI 1 •"t l.': Yi .Ail J_...�.. Y: .;r.' - `,b!.Ci.t l:y i C ',✓t�.'I`a i'l..LilNfi �:2- i SI.' :I,l".e- .F31� 'r3' ' ,. A ', .. ;, . . _!Y'r :11itr'.t /• IfG 1'1( 1 {,` I I fle.( fit1' f',y. Nfill �Ifr•'1. 't.. 1 t'i.':A 1.1..4�:•c. I-.- .; },f-{ �t% it fV :rx It9'� ' - I a_<,.;1 $il'1{IJOf it it If; I.I,,I I r �a f 1- ti- A xJd.. :ii .' i, ;;. :....:. W�Cyi.. 4..1 ,.::t 1 •-'.�a rF`l:{ :1 i.rf ,`.111 Jl r �'id-.y.' C(.- 'stir -� :� v,.S:i f...1}.. 1�.J.. :k.7.1 ea' 1.1 iw;� K.I T LUS_d.•. ' l b' `.� ... .`�{:,IL 1,i i(.a7.1:> Lti.o`3.1...._'.F�', •- . t� <a.G'4' i. �-� rl {; :mil •ter:Y{i:i �.{._.r- � t. Inr.J r,`�: ti idf .'._ ".:,.,,YI (-11:' 1..- '{':�.-..ItJll: -A':. •.:::n.( .Tk.t ,t�tk. t4'1: 1:61'1 r. •e. .:..1 :.a. ':it J, k I'.w: A a:7- NI-� �-w :CI.:"tl } I l.,y:. t4•,:i}: #-1 4)- 1 fa 'A IJ.� 1-.. s`dl•1 ,.J y! Iv,it..✓.r :.t `, ..1 i.{.....�:..e -i:� ibl a:r. ct1t(r '�lY..+tl1 1 •ii.: Y..1f'.t t.{ uli 1 qkn• T'+i ^_#) :.ittt d .. ✓.rJtc;li:' '.•F 1 O' t=tT dl c _r iddl ` ;�.aii:' im 11 "'•�='1'-.I.I:f I �f l:�'.i CSi-•' ': t4+'t' - d✓,• Y..l�1� �.-� 1- r 14.1 _{IH K Tit 1. II� :hilt li tllt!%1{ �• :/:1 Y1 ^. 7kil ,d/:•l.frt J(. .',4- '•'n+ S • { 1 'I •;fiF IIIII :•TI 7::1'� i)•xI=2' t +1 ,.IN �71Fh*PP 1 lir .1 f 1FKdf. - i. .iY t ♦ 1- { .11 1'-i r.� ♦' '.� , 1 f ✓,.I' 111 it t,, 'i... 1' -3 al+ •� 1 a:war; J1 t': _ (r �iIY lll.Xl' �• 1��-�'i d^ �1` t 1:.' »t -1.., a k 1 711)+)1Pf II 3%d.61 'Ytt9 J- 1.id'r;#Itd Y =1J1 i d.' 14y i.i { lFi a' >ill 1.�:y v:.1:1 .l•i+ d1-1. ''{vl ti'Fll •,1'11 tt1 t:{J% -:xi1 i�?. ,1{i '.: k`f,i` ,. 1%d ;t•:T :Ik• t l - �,i'.I r:+i.. '•.. i T.LC.�. L: 13 FX'+.{{1H' •'d.-. 1 -✓'.1.1.1'11. -.1-;111-Cil {C;1, :e C`- r-.may.11!. �.P 1,.i.- •. } i. .. 1:IJJJ I111':� ::.L{):-1 - ..U-:1:-. 1 `F>+tI'jl + l:) I A: 1,• . .yl. All i tit •1i.r:u 1 CIF/ �d `i.uli.� I: ..I.I:1 1. - 1 1 v• 1'1fT1,�111.4. 4111411 1 •.r. � Ikk- p� Y - i too gr•; t. -•7 Y'. It .irt. � • }.;t:1+.. is •_,-F1 :ut-:, t, •, �:�< 1�iti[/: :F :w,.a-t t, . 9. - '? y dt.. t.=1•l. ^_d .1 -ii"—.:'LA1'` IF: Or .A t•. � ,•, r IIc lty,wF,:=1 :It1t:a 1 ,a CIT1i �P CtD�EBt'YBI�0 IBM 10300 Ti3 � � p �4 �5►�-4i ' 11+41i1�6 � S t A1ttC �� AM Ai.�� CW THE CITY CW CUpMMW FM MAY 24, IW3, MWMG Una U4 COMMCS ROM A.Crff HALL. AT 103l1b'i E 17A1® CAINUI� IA S id The mwft was aalM to order at 9:37 P.M.by CMMOO'B Lim RQUf CALL Members Present: Lim.Weber,fie.HwV,Frolich Members Absent: None p it staff PreseSt sTn PL trNDA Llt -None WHiTT�N AND VENAL CpA�VIU1�iHCATItDNS -None FOltlttiA[.1$��' N to ill a 8II 1) Anulication AAC S-Af;A�C-93 Ct�'d;n Sim- and ata 130 ftbd Sum►of emsting mop center.located on the FA9 of Do Ana Silveiado Daulevaad. the sign met all tlm of the planner Robillard wAgwW the staff Commits noting in the siaSf He stall the the new and current SIPwi* of the item ouffiniedapplicant was willing to work with the staff to con wih the height dtlre to as and members. Craig Maynard,Cal Neon signs, wvw%,ed staff oamments and answerer!quastWw of the Committee Mom• Committee Member Frolich had no MMUS with the Pam' Committee Member Harris felt the tenant letters should be the same knight as the addw s numbers. The address numbers should be grew to match the sign Colors Committee Member Weber whether the CarrotsRestaufam was Partof the same Center as thejr Dave an misft sign ally. planner Robillard state Cw"Ws was part of the whole Cceter• Commmitiee Member Weber s he had Concerns that this was a second ground sign.for the center which did not meet the frontage criteria,and further tee sign does not have a center name. Committee N&xg er Hoxsie stated that he felt the same as Committee Member Weber. s with the and stated that a sign is needed as the tenants have Chairperson lam stated he had A problemsip i and a.existing De Anna Ceram sign are too close and a very little viss'bilit!!but that the proposed gn combined sign or modifications of either one should be devetolvd. or lack of a second Committee Member Weber moved to ding the application,which died f Counnitte�e Member Harris moved to CGIOnVe the item to the meeting of June 14 in order for the applicant to De Anna Center sign be modified to revise the sign plan with the direction that possibly ceW ilto the proposed sign- advertise CWTOWs only and that the Oe Anaa Center IN ASAC*bfivaks Moy 24,1 3 7U qVk=was elm directed to bring in color WWk%pbotagrapbs,and have sty resre$on the badkgmund of ft CaraWs4k!tea Cenr sign. WowL 1MM:tlils 01d Aphnn fern Zs j�� ASAC 11 IJ90 - phmmd Pry for a new offs &D/ ' camplex.Ths site is at the Souftast quadrant of 1280 and De Am Blvd~ Torn Robillard reviewed staff Commem noting that ASAC rcqmted the appl,carrt to MIU1 with ens to signs B and C6 and signs A on Marian Avcm- Cmmuttee Member Harris will abstain fim this item due to met of interest. Jades June Horton,Cupertino,Gateway Parma,and Seca Cuyler,sq p designer,presented fe scope of dse Pmlm and reviewed die badWound of bow the signs were designed and developed- TheY addressed der scale of dw signs and how nary relate to the building,. Committee Member HDxcje stated he him the veriiad scale of signs C6 at the 10 foot height. Ile stated that he Wees with the sued down version of the A m p for Marian Avenue but feels drat the size oould be increased so that it would be in between the size and the sew proposed vers100- Lasdy,he stated ire does not Mo sign B;feeling the sign is too big and clasbes with der design of sign A. Member VrJeber stag he bikes the overall sign pry with the won of sign B. He stag that he feels sign B does not match the quality of"rat of the signs designs. He stated he prelbrs the sealed down A version at the end of Marian Avenue and Possrbly a sign 9OW down in between the original versions and the smaller version for the Srst cmgm on Mariam Avam Ludy.he stated he pr&rs dw C6 sign to be 8 feet bigh. committeeMember Frolics felt that the A sign was okay,the tcaoant pand on do B signs should be reduce to ow.foot;the A sign at*0 end of Marian Avenue should be reduced to the 6 foot height and sign C,as orig4mlly Proposed,is ale. amuperso►Lim stag the A sign was acceptable and that the.A sip at the end of der C sign but should be scaled downs. He stated he had no problems with the original height pressed comm °t A'h the B Op. He stated dw B sign was too high aril books hbe a temporary SIP. ex • In response to Coa mittee Member Lim`s question,Mr.Cuyler stag be can reduce the size of the sign Proportionately but would refrain fiom simply shnakng eats of dre Panels. Chairperson Lim suggested that the Cormmom vote on each of the signs seParately as dsere does not seem to be a consensus on the entire Package. Committee Member Frolich made a motion to approve the A signs on De Anza Boulevard and the first entrance on Marian Avenue as originally proposed and dw A sign at the se=d entrance on Mariam Avenue should be scaiied down to the 6 foot 4 inch height. II&motion was approved on a 3-1 vote with C.ommiUW Mead weber dissenting. Committee Member Hoxsie moved to approve the C signs at dw 10 foot height limit. On a 2 to 2 vote, with Coma mee Members Weber.and Frolics dissenting,the motion was denied. ASACtfiniiin r Commftw Member Wdbu ma&a modw,w approve do C sAp at the S fixt hatabt It d 3 fiir luk of Cmmaw Member FWIM moved to Wwo that>C sign as originally pwpowd at do l l Not IU motion was decied can a 2 to 2 vc to wfth Committee N cubWs Weber and gl'n* Committee Member Ifcocsie amwed his mofwn to approve the C signs at the 10 fixt hdgbL On a 3 to 1 voter,wfth Committee Member Weber disseaft and Cmmittee Manber Harris the C sign was approved at 10 W high. Ater dmwssmg the potatial options for the B sign with the whet,the Committee unanmm*. agreed to contimie approval of do B sip until the meeting of June 14 so the applicant cmild rada r it v db the Mowing duacdow 'iron cent of flat B sign was not accgoble,sash d=M be styled more in line vide the concepts of flee A and C signs. Mw letbmdag line went is too small and wOUJd be difrcuh to read, IU pctcatial ides would be to cluster do tenant wanes as styled after the D signs. Derision On a 3-1 vote,application ASAC 11.U-90,was approved accoift to do fiv&V contained in the Model Resohntion wiffi Ffiufing 4 dcbftd rmd CondWous 1 and 2 added to read as follows: onrlat M 1. The approval is based upon the sign criteria palge dated May 24, 1993 cog 9 sheets. 2., IU B sips are not approved as part of"Resohidion and are cmthuA to the of Juv 14, 1993 with the direction as given by A.SAC at flee mactimg of Mr y 24, 1993. 3) AMC_91004120 Sigg Oxdinancc(itedao-Review and approval of the Cupertino Sign revision. Committee Member Harris moved to approve the Sign Ordinance as submitted accoift to the findwp contained in the Model Resolution. Committee Members Fwhch and Weber stated they would am vote for approval. Chairperson Lim,Committee Membees Harris and Name dismsed the snake-rep of the Rooiutiow Committee Member Harris hated out a model resolution for the C,ommittec to acoept regudmg approval of the Sign Ordinance. After dissanssion,it was agreed that the Committee MemWs Harris'resohdion and the model resolution,as prepared by stall;should be combbmA Committee Member Harris'version of the resolution is labeled as such and dated May 24, 1993. ,s ® `iU last pmouph of Commium Member Harris'resolimm should be written to state: and*wcftw-, be it further resolved that any Sign Ordinance proposal written by anyone individual be filed for oonsideration when ASAC or any other cemmium is charged in the fitture with further Mvisions. x s � s ,51,004.120 on a 3-2 VM with W ate Fv*& in tbO t Sim wss Harris. combiaw with an resohilim submitted by C4mmism Member MWM OF Mm*a Fwh& tbO Mn oftb@ May 4) On a 4.0 fie.with COMMAX 10, 1993 wore qw..d vath the Pap �h to the a m ' 3,it�3,last dwV pongtaph with the same item o :mEfflEMM of abaft dm Pizza Hot OF WUML Comfivo Member FrOU&q=fi0WW the P 1n response,Player saifiard gtwd the City AMUNY was wftft lids kssue. Co..w.Member Weber OW staff on the pm ofthO bw *the pSTW aw=*and the Chiba Beach 94. Member Harris had no c Member Haxsie stated be win submit hn front ASAC this wegk and"wt71 be his ® Lid • ' Mew the C�awards� at 7:00 P.M. 1:.e Lim ASAC. tbau 11R..W Hoxsie fcr his 6M mph+ wd BlgQitT OF STR Plate Robifiard had nothing'o ICIPW4. eess[9L1(tt+1MMEEI�IT A. At 10:?0 P.,M.to the nod��T of Ium 14, 1993, 7:30 P.M., PREPARE®BY: APPROVED By: XO� Lam, Thomasl; R,ebillar�l dual and Site AppWral COnmftw Plasm"II AITEST. J 4k&-47 norms►COMclius City clerk 0,tl gumVAS •12493 ( Wa4rss) I N s i.laet„I � 1.= al. .,1a1 •. L i:::t n c,. t.+a' i� iir>rr-r-� ;>:.a :.•Ji ITT r ' r .r... i¢' tt r.ttnr;t' a; r t, :rul I{ • r;1, VT 17 r:A: A' +`I;1 'd.i:- ..?jt^�'rl'I '• --i G•' Y{'t afi it:l= � lr It^il I' !-L'-011 7 .'1 9b 11 'tl _ +►: .er.!•- ;l .( .Alin uarra:r ! c' :r'i t E'.. a:i,.l -i t '•'I 11" 1, 1't 319' �:+11 tSi .1.K!"-1�. 171 ! r-. + 7 J'- t'' ', 5+111. 1.,•f' •.7 \:'ill 1 l) '.-L'.^ Y`-rl :1 '.i .�11. :f- ;11!d /t .::.':i lt(:t �: A' 1? r.i.T:..'L� - ,.t Iritl llitr' ,-14r'1.-1 r �'r'�. .`.I.TI...� 1`. � 'lf H�')t«r i. It I :' ";1J.j: .1•} >,_;. /',. 1-r.l':":1. `r%I t. tO it .,,a {i' r'-Fr✓.rO _ .ir- a i' •�ar�r lr.�.ri-�# ai.r ra•• 'tllr A 1'alru" r•. I'.� A'.Il Irli li'-- 11.✓G'l-='i 1 ... :..... -:t11. �:.t•il .rr • «y Yfli..A 11 f"i�it -:.`I'/r 7 +:'17' 4M 13:',++'- 1`"i.• li'.Y: �i .14'A3 rJ.t 111:li" t w:;i.'' 1:.1' 11 1 1 Ill.i•=1Ik 7"_At'ti ' '1 vi' -.5.111 •-fill Li I11.' .K:t-1 �.i' .Il i 1,� . - i 1'I.I(1:1 11- Il::l:+, '.A, 1. ...1 I'.j,�.1' .i,: ;i'-a 1, •ti. 1-. A', Y'•.7C :.L,l .I'II I U.i 'L1nrI..1=;.? '1?. .�lr'R'. .I it a t 1 :r .11• ,. 1, 1'. 1 r{.di111P1 .1 :1�!71 -,T .'If r :1.1''L) 1 = •17 �-'1! 1.,� :l I AI t',Ji : l i e,tl,/.'i Y I' . 1 v r rt r a 1 1 p ,,,. ;r,.A ✓11 Ail ' ' � .t Ilt:l.r':.l 1. 1."• II{:A�= -�":f I IA.11"I '�1.1 1.1'.il'i 'J: :I1.1 If!Illly:/. 1.l,rl `A: I,{ r_I:-A M.Ifi J'III' '1'1.1.frlj:f :111 +:111;11 1 Y11 :'LY I;F.:f 1 P •, f... >v ' ` A&W Mhmo Jane 14. 1l1931' Page-2- I. Thtd the Fwased sign is caiisfted a third mommuM sign f w the &j and oval of the sip is an euq9w ito the dp code. 2. Tbal the liturd eriftegmew of the provisions of this odium will nub in jesmictions inconsistew with 11m spirit and I I I of this 3. TbW the gr nft of the exceptim will not result in a condition which is mate Way denimental to the public health,safety and weliime. 4. That the viception to be granted 6 one that will require the hwst modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accompm this paw 9. The approval is based upon the sign elevation criteria as approved by ASAC on June 14, 1993 camps as may be amended by the conditions enumerated herein. 12. The sign body shall be a maser of 61 in height. 13. The namnber of tenant names shall be limited to S. 14. TU root structure on the DeAma C,ents(CarroWs sip shall be removed conciumudy with lion of the approved sign 2. Application ASAC 11-U-90 Cupertino Gateway Partners - Requesting review and approval for a planned development sign program for a new office R&D Cammexcial Complex. The sign is located at the souticast quadrant of A 280 and DeAm Blvd. Jadde Jrme4iorton,Cupertino Gateway Pa¢tms, reviewed the scope of the pwject noting that the redesigned the sign according to ASACs dire him at the last meeting and that Apple Comer found the propoosl unacceptible, She requested a decision flom ASAC regarding the proposal as presented at the lax€ meethig Chdqwson Iam restated the reasons why they thought the sign was unacceptable at the last meaft that being it was tam high and did not wak well with the other signs for that center Cwmftw Member Wdxr seated that he did not lace the proposed sign at the last two meedngs6 had not changed his mind and would reoonumn I denial. C unittee Member Weber moved to deny elm application,the motion died for lack of a second. CommOn Member Frolich moved to approve the application with an overall height of 8 it. Committee Member lam secondcO the motim On a 2-1 vote with Committee Member WdWr dissenft Application ASAC 11 U-90 was approved according to the findings and conditions coonmiedt in the Model Resolution with con(knon 1 modified to rpsd as follows: Condition 1: The retail tenant sign B dated Jone 14, 1993 is approved as part of this application with the overall bight reduced to 8 A.maximum 3. Application 9-ASAC-93 T.W. International Company - Requesting review and approval of Architectural Detailing for Agnes Site layout of a single family located on lot 188,Dorothy Ann Way. City Planner Wordell renewed the scope of the project and taiwated oft concern regarding the landscaping and architectural detailing on the left side of the brWding. Site also stated that this lot is in covered under the new hillside policies in the General Plan. She stated that areas with a 30%or greater slope are considered unbuildablc. In her calculation,a portion of the building is lid on an area where the slope is greater than 30'�/a She stated as the applicant was in the process of submittal at the time the General Plan was approved that staff would consider thi d test case and as staff considers the location of the building to be the best location on the lot. . A l 8 Sty am and TMy Wamra. tho le8el¢3e offhe b $which addedand doa►s Oft tl�aril and the atanOM Of The go an fhe food was old shaold be �the lot. mintmftd in T� " Weber '� also&=PA doluvz on the right � of flea an adiftiond condition levidins �s. wilh go plea add more archhccMddr..r to 1e11 elevation. a. �AMCM � toResohdon ti Oa a 3-0 vote vM Candy 11 aVA 12 adde'd to read as folYm WM coneained in the Model Coaditloax shall flee armed to & loft as on the 11. mWification 1ba dam lM 14.1"3. shall ftpo=PW alien be ubmMW to Maalb whh the The t'"W 12. btinPb"l ?A8ny on fire dte. end aplmvat fxm to 4. 1 - comer at the soutboM car=of Stcvts Cs& an ar�dng Boalevard and Poreal Avenue. ® Cyly ply W that elms is thea minor on of the use grra�crhich the Director is val repvding ASAC apPto oMMiM Shemod Marshall, A flee MP Of flee Pry ad answand of the o ambers. The the s3-ie a hour hm of aft dU fde buitdi `M of Flee ass Ouffi iaa and since them b Was developld in an incnmcnW MOM- Ded&x On a 3-0 via, a5-ASAC-92.2 was M11W--Mtmg to the fi~and MdWmm conwAsed in the moM dam with 5. Approval of -On a 3-0 vote.the mimaes of fltie NOW m d �•1993 were the followinS : s1�4ald read"Vise and member Fad 3,third paragraph. shanld tad .�a 3-1 vote w�itic� Ch�+*9d�n w pap 3, sew l��h at 10 ft.high.• llarr;s was Page 4,leaf para"h for item 3 should seato the WO Md Web" � APFhcoon ASAC y� O,: pee a 3-2 vote with C combined with�won was to the cormined in teh Model AesolemOn as omb a 1 c 0 Sign mnbanitted by CowmOmba}lams. Corr��l>fE a ked staff to r ors tt�China Beach sign, the Petao Sign and the Town Ceeeter Committee Member Weber Signs. s W.ltobiilard stated that he wasso worbgg on the China Beach PPand he *A flee StWs Bicycle sign on their at Fond Plus was legal ` {}i Ed liAV 1:.. :c wtl l'.n- s ta,l.3r Y. 1�% •x f...# 1. '.f."4. l,_-Y 'F.'v A •:.1_ �-kl�l"i_. �.93. .yW - ."�"'- .. ,.. ..aa- 1„a.. �:,:. '.;ram 4 .;" 4'�:A ..:i=-. �t.q:.:"n: .,.yq-L .�s�"' t;o:, t-- w#a.; ♦t_fr, - 77 .1T _ ta+ r ` Tit tl#- rip . t !p; .�,` -,�.- ry_�y�yp •'+,�,8-. .' ;,;��.'r� s xl—•-a -Z' - -T�'y`.��:. }.�.>.. .+�'�� 4' 'I. .. 4- }' ' yt } � y. • r>tl f it '-�: o, I' I:1�;•. i'.! ✓,,Y-c-.- i. .•hi ,i , ..l'IfII ry �r 1 l r r r ri P i _ F ? J a r, y: ti. j Y sa' 0-101- IS t, CITY Oft c 7 - s8 10300 TORR1E rWO,CALWOFMA 95014(40*252.4505 bM I M OF ME REGR AR hOMMM OF THE ARCHITEMRAL At&SfM APPROVAL COU%ff'M OF THE CIw or CUPERTM FOR RILY 1% 1993.AGFnNG HUD IN CONFERENCE ROOM A.CffY HALL. AT 10300 TORRE AVENM CUMTM t'AUFORNIA 93014 The meeting was called to order at 7:40 P.M.by Chairrmon Umi LOLL CALL Members Present: Lion,Weber,Harris.Frolich Members Absent: None Staff Present: 'no 'is R. Planner ff POSTPONEMENTS AND AD.'UST'e7[E29'F5 TO THR AG1E14DA -None WRITTEN AND VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS -None CONSENT�CALENDAR On a 3-1 vote with Committee Member Harris dessend g,Items 1 and 2 were removed ffoin the Consent Calendar. EMAI.1IEVl-W: New Hnsiness 1) Aonllcatlon 13-ASAC-93-Aeadla Ve�nnry Clime-RequestiaStaview and approval of a ground sign for an existing office building located on the northeast corner of Stevens Creek and Foothill Boulevard. Committee Member Weber Westioned how the base was going to be constructed and questioned whether the site had over 200 R.of frontage. Decision: On a 4-0 vote,Application 13-ASAC-93 was approved according to ilia findings and conditions contained in the Model Resolution,with Condition 2 added to read as follows: Conditions: 2. The address number shall be added to the bottom of the sign. 2) Application WASAC-93 Center for Sm4ems Management- review and approval for a ground sign located at an existing office building on the southwest corner of Tantau r vemw and Pruneridge Avenue. Committee Members Lim and Weber questioned the appearance of the posed sign. Planner Robillard presented a photograph of the sign. Decision: On a 4-0 vote, Application 14-ASAC-93 was approved according to ft findings and conditiom contained in the Mod--I Resolution. " 71 MR,�7 rr ws ASAC MhuMa duly 12,1993 Page-2- F(DPJ"L SF �Y: old 13rrsrnesir 3) Appllcation l-ASA -CpmmOao Coax lop of.fah Re4tiostitig faview and approval of minor modifications to the landscap plan for an existing church located on the south side of McClellan Read east of and a*certt to Highway 83 Corridor. Decisi-u: On a 4.0 vole, Item 4, Application 1I-ASAC-93, was moved to the end of the agenda due to the applicant not being present. FOPJ4AL AKVIK : View&smm 5) Application 20-U-96 -JMB Pe+Wz tea (The Adis) - Requesting review and approval of a minor dmnge to a use permit to allow outside seating and landscape review for an existing remm= located at the Oaks CenW at Stevens Creek Boulevard and Mary Avenue. Manner Robillard reviewed the scope of the changes being proposed by the Colhe Society. He stated a planting area with low shrubs and vines would be constnict( ';hound the outside seating area. Committee Member Harris questioned the eoliv and materials of the seating. Committee Member Weber questioned whether there were going to be outside speakers, and what kind of impact that would have. Committee Member Harris also reiterated that concern. Planner Robillard suggested that this concern be request to the Planning Director rather than being put as a condition of approval for the landscaping. Decision: Or a 4-0 vote, Application ASAC 20-11-86 was approved according to the findings and conditions contained in the Model Resolution with Finding 1 modified to read as follows: P`indings: 1) That the proposed exterior remodeling and landscaping will be a benefit and asset to the center and community and impr-ove the atmosphere for the applicant and the center. 4) Application 12-ASAC-93 - Brinker Intl, LQM's) - Requesting review and approval for minor architectural modifications and a sign program approval for an existing restaurant located on the south side of Stevens Creek Boulevard approximately 3001 east of Blaney Avenue, Planner Robillard placed a conference call to Kim Woodard,Brinker International. Planner Robillard reviewed the scope of the project noting ASAL needs to approve the colors and materials being used to remodel the exterior of the building and approved the new proposed signs. Committee Member Frolich questioned whether the existing monument sign would remain and be changed. In response,Mr.Woodard stated the monument sign would remain as is. Committee Member Frolich stated the signs size are reasonable due to the length of the building. Coro,-itwa Member Harris felt the signs wr a acceptable and suggested increasing the number seats in the restaurant as it is a popular avourant. t ASAC Mbrites Ally 12, 1"3 Page-3- Committee Member Weler stated he had Iudiems with ft signs,that they are too and m e many and does not reflect the two modification to the prescribe requivonents in the Ordinance. Maas Ward stated that they are cartaidering am installing the neon sign over the front eattance due to economic c.astmints and stated that it would to her to have that sigh not approved with the sign fang Stevens Cry Boulevard approve. The Committee Members felt that this was acceptable. Decision: On a 4-0 vote,Application 12-ASAC,*13 was approved warding to the findings and conditions contained in the Model Resolution with Finding 3 modified ana Condition 10 added to read as follows: landing: 3) That the proposed sign is approved as as exception to ilea existing and proposed Sigh Ordi umm whereas;neon sign SD 3.02 is consistent with the spirit and intent of the Sign Ordinance,is beneficial to the public health,safety and welfare and the proposed sign is the least modification'n the prescribed and the proposed regulations. Condition: 10) Neon sign No. 1 SD 3.01 is not 4 proved as part of this sign program. 3) Annlig ien 11 ASACA--Cntrer4hno CongMgjtion of d1ova6 Witness on a 4-0 vote was continued to the muting of July 26, 1993 due to the applicant not being present. Annnov�J of Minutes 6) On a 3-0 vote with Committee Member Harris abstaining, the Minutes of June 14, 1993 were approved with the following change: Under members present: Committee Member Hoxste should not be included 7) The Committee felt that no minutes should be approved for June 29, 1993,as there was no meeting. Comm jft RenoM Committee Member Weber asked staff to look into the monument sign where Pacific Fresh used to be to verify c.hether it meets the sign program or not. Committee Member Lim asked staff to look into 11he condition of the gas station at the southeast corner of Wolfe and Miller Avenue. He stated that weeds seemed to be a big problem there. Report of Staff Staff reported on the City Council action regarding the Sign Ordinance. ASAC OWN My 12,1993 A1�arnm�a4 At 9:15 to the aead tamer neeft t®be hdd an Agy 26, 1993,7:30 p.m.GORhfeM ROM k p by: Thomas IL Rdbi WayLfDt 1�awmam Arc --eaWW aW Site AppMW Cwumfttw Rob t.Deputy City C1 Robert Wt. W=V sWWin71293 WE CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORCKE AVENUE,CUPERTINO.CALIFORNIA 95014(408)252.4505 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MELTING OF THE ARCHITECrURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR AT I ,GU,aT 9, 1993,MEETING HELD IN CONFERENCE ROOM A,CITY HALL, AT 10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALIFORNIA 95014 The miming was called to Dower at 7:40 P.M.by Vice Chairman Weber ItOLL CALL Members Present: Weber,Harris,Frolich Members Absent: Lim Staff Present: Tom Robilhgr&Planner B POSTFMMENTS AND AMSTWNTS TO THE AGENDA ORDER -None WRITTEN AND VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS -None EQ_4 &L REVIEW Old Business 1) AnnlisOl n S-ASAC-93 Richard Hartman - Request of review and approval of i t !aatdscape and grading plan for a single family home located on the west side terminus of Dorothy Anne Way. Planner Robillard reviewed the scope of the project. K-noted that the applicant indicated that preserving the walnut tree is an important priority for them and used his concern with the amount of grading which is proposed on the lot. Planner Robillard stated that the new General Plan policies require developers of hillside lots to pork with the natural contours of the land and minimize the amount of grading. He suggested that the lawn area be eliminated and left in its natural state. Richard Hartman,Project Architect,and Cindy Henry addressed staffs concerns as follows: The walnut tree will be preserved as it is an important aspect of the land to the owner. The gradir:g plan was redone in order to allow the guest parking to be placed closer to the house and to add a small lawn area. Mr.Hartman indicated that the civil engineer indicated he could grade the lot without importing any fall. Committee Member Harris stated that she did not have any problems with the grading plan and the lawn area She expressed some concern regarding the width of the driveway saying that it should accommodate two cars passing each other. The other committee members agreed. Decision: On a 3-0 vote Application 5-ASAC-93 was approved according!o the findings and conditions contained in the Model Resolution with Condition 3 added to read as follows: 3) The driveway width shall be a minimum of!6 ft. Approval of Minutes 2) On a 3-0 vote the minutes of July 26, 1993 were approved with the following modifications: Page 2,Sth paragraph to read: Board Member Vernon indicated that no residents had spoken on the landscaping issue at the Planning Commission Hearing. Paragraph S.last sentence: Additional should read addition Fpy + A$R+C Miks Awn 9.IM Faarsagra�pl4 9, Comma Harris moved to end the gpogd Mohatiitn created by Staff to require that the p Weny GwM Mostby Me be� and o1 one to three UM 15 gallon size up to a mwdmum of$ISO-0W*OM0 pV tab ;,laming ctmM with the tree typechosen by t gtpb 1D,1a to read: p tgr arm. If the proms}+GWM does wm tree pisnw g,the plantatag shaft be--Weted prior to the final biding im mon. NP 3,under report Of IMM.Mond and tblyd sentenew to rUd: Committee Membins were gives a CW of the Were+Si. inane,which will be On September 16, lace. Staff s that ASAC wodd through 0,, ., lace and stated that dte Phu 18 the later part of Dgsiga Chatette woWd take Committee Member Frolich asked if staff?VWd come back with a CodeEnforcementaction on Aas y Mountun spwal sal�activities. Committee Frolich stated that he would not be a4 the ASAC Meeting on amefing of for the Septes „r. R Wort of Sta Alone. Ad �tfleiat At 8:40 to the neat Mgolaf meeting to be held on August 23, 1993,7:30 p.m.Conference Room A, Prepared by: Approved by: (!mo�ww �Jr1 Thomas illard,Nammmef it Tom Weber,Vice Chairman Architectural and Site k,Paval Committee Attest: Kim Smith, City Clerk g/mm/aaWming"3