HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC 1992 - 1993 IC
Cm or ,"s. w
2600 '1 Ate, CMWMW, SSA (408) 252-4505
CW 'Yf1E ==M nam CW 3 '8Y dl
AND SEM AFFF4 TAL OMMM OF SM MY OF CM S EM
APn 13, 1992, HMV= MD = GMEMM MM A.
CI't9l Ems, AT 10300 == Ate, emmaw OWUM
7he meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.1L by *Wxpe am Kwole.
NaL
Members Present: Hmmie, Lim, Jet, der, Lav'ics
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Thomas Robillard, Platter 11
1 W WE AGOM OEM
2. Agtplicatiari 9- 4C:g2 -ac3eiro - Est om*imanoe toe meetingym-
of Aptril 27, 1992.
of a 5-0 'vote the applicatImi was om*Jraaed per the appllmnts request.
Aw Nomm ammil
-
Neute.
BAR[Jti � �
1. Apg► 1-4J-92 Jack iD the - l equest$Tq early revue of Use lFexmit
for a freestanding fast-food restaurant, at the nest cam' of
Ste mns Coaeek Etivd. and Saicd;i Way.
Cc u mittree Newber Jam stated she would abstain from caLventing eat this
appliemeticn due to a conflict: of inter.
James Jae7man, a+e;rr ese:tting the applicant, introduced the prqjec:tt to the
puttee Members atditessing staff coatoetts and the changes W h have
taken place.
Ttm RdAllard reviewed the staff ommwts noting staffs concern with the
land .ir q, arc hitecturet, and signacle. He reiterated sane of ASAC's
conoerns from the previous "early review". lastly, 11r. Rnbill ar d cent:;cued
that he would transmit t ASAC's caments to t-w Planning Ccmaissicn as scan
as ASAC is finished.
Walt Goodseal, eject architect, rreviet ted time scope of the project and
described the architeabitral style. He patted several sketches which
portrayed different architecttra]. style. He stated the Foodtmher is more
than wzllizxj to wark with the City in order to develop an arc titecbtaral
style which is acineptable and they are root held to any particular style.
He also anst+m-ed questfemm of the Committee Members.
sov
j44y n # y
149
$58 8 &
gbggfi � 9
• O �
Apie'l 13, 1992
3-
Gary Anderson, midway Ste, reviewed the staff CoamentS and ardMered
s t3oss of the cxumittee Members. He Stated that the n8M sign had been
swiped around and calculated to cover less than 17% of the window .
oasmittee Member ia'svics stated that the neon sus still to stake the
store front appear may.
Committee der Lim stated that the proposal was aCCRAable with the
aunt of signage.
O=ittee Member Jackson stated that until a clear policy on dealing with
neon signs .is formulated, she would approve the neon signs.
committee member Weter stated there was shill too =xh neon sigrage in the
windows. Be stated that it is obtrusive and visible from Stevens Creek
Blvd.
Cha.,xperson Hcxs e stag the signs are very amble but that iLs "deli"
siS., is better looking than the "Baked goods" sign. He stnt d the
"moo and (Veal" supw are too =xh and too bright for the window. As a
Ozqxomise he would reoom and approval if the " sign was remuved
leaviszg just the Mali" sign and the "oper-i" sign.
Committee Member IAm moved to approve the al n with the, additional
condition to move the red bordw around the °'G esso" sign and to move
the "opens" signs to the same side as ttse "Deli" signs.
on a 2-3 vote, the notion was not approved.
on a 3-2 vote, with CM=ittee Members Jadtsarn and TAvics desc entiYng,
Application 8 ASAC-92 was approved aocording to the findhrw and conditions
curtained in the -* del resolution with Finding 2 deleted, aonditi,'<,-. 3
modified, and Ccndi cion 10 added to read as follows:
9. The approval is based upon. site plarss and pho dated April 13,
1992, except as may be aamendW by the conditions amm rated herein-
10. The "Bqpressd' sign is not approved as part of this application.
4. Am)1 oatian 10-ASAC-92 xiassoo's Restauxa t - Requesting reviewand
approval for a planned developmOnt sign Program for an Odsting rerstasrar-t
located on the Fast side of De Anza Blvd. tely 250 ft. North of
Bollingw Rid.
Mom Robillard reviewed the staff comments noting that the direction from
ASAC, from the previous meeting, was for the applicant to =v.1der adding
the words "Greets: Specialties" underneath the building mounted sign.
.
t
ASi4C4Wil, 23, $992
Page -4-
Geoff Tsagaris stated that he felt it was not fadr not to l+et him have a
monment sign. He stated that he needs a montment sign to iklent4fy the
site w�a�nyd� the he is selling and to tell who they are and what
they Sen.
Ommittee Member Jades suppcwts the wilding mmxdmd signs only with the
words, "Greek Slaecialtie8" on the windows instead.
Ommittee MmWxw Lnins agreed with Ccomittes VAmber JWkson.
Om mittes Mwbw Lim agreed that the vends Specialties" should be
aid on the building.
Cmuittes Membw WJ= stated that the building colors, Ummlves, make
the building very visible. In addition, the site does not meet the 200 ft.
rule criteria for building mow*,ed signs.
Cmnittee Member Lim stated that there are many sestaa�cats in ®qmn-tim
which do riot have motment. signs, such as, Marie CIalerubms, C=utons, and
Flontana Is.
Ommittee Member Jacksm stated that the building calms act Ulm a sign.
necisiog: On a 5-0 vote - ApplicaI 10-A.SAC-92 was denied according to
the findings contained in the model resolution.
On a 5-0 vote, the Oaanittee VAmg=s continued Item 8, ASAC 3-"2
(Modified) to the meeting of April 27, 1992 due to the hen of the evening and
the nnmiaer of items on the tea.
5. AMjjc_jtian 147ASAC-92 The ®r jV jW - Pagv9sting review and approval
for a freeway oriented sign for an Ming building located in a light
industrial zone. The site is located on the &nst side of Bubb Rd.
approximately 300 ft. South of Stevens Creek Blvd.
Tbm Dillard reviewed the staff cmments rusting the direction from ASAC
from the last meeting.
Jim Fame, The Driving Macioce, submitted plums of the site with a
mock-up of the sign placed on the building. W, also presented ya video tape
shoring the views from Stevens Creek Blvd. and the 85 may.
Ommittee Member Weber felt that approving the additional sign on the East
elevation would cause an over proliferation of signs.
t
ASACAWMM ApdI 13v 1992
Page -5-
Ctmmitte s Neubw Lim state he would not sqVOrL the wing Sigu Cn tris
East aawtim. 'The m==Mt sign ors Bubb rd., the sign en the Narth
elevation and ite, clear visibility an Stems Creek Blvd., ace m=+e than
sufficient.
C�aitt eeyAubw Iavics stated she does not have a prcblm V`:h approving
trw East ele%wtian sue, but sbe is not convinced of the nod fog it.
C itt�ee yie= jadcsm m4Vorts the sign. Me stated that the b bluing
need visibility at Fly 85 and stsvew trek Blvd. I MtIM because
of lu ted view of the sign fr m Stevens, Creek Blvd.
Ommnittee stated that he feat the building has ena
and visibility is adequate.
e a s On a 3-2 vote, with COWittee Jackson and havics
desoenti ng, d4 li cation 14 Ash-c-92 was cried according to the foUnwing
findings:
1. That the nature of the business dkx . spot require ftmeway criented
Ste•
2. 7hat the building sign an the North el,e vtian maw the visibility and
identification needs of the applic Mt. Pffi^thar that the Fruposed East
eleva`aicn sign is not r-xUly visible fnA StevensCreek Blvd. and
Freeway 85 making the sib xMBOSSISMY.
S—So
6. Alioa 7b CMcw - requesting
u t �r
review and ap=wml to modify the Wilding oole s and sign for an
existing restaurant located at the southeast carver of Stevens Omk Blvd-
and Portal Ave.
Tom imbillard reviewed the staff comments rooting that the scope of the
a�pplicatiaai was to repaint the restaurant and modify the sign proga m-
Earen Lejman, restaurant Ent. eroW, reviewed the staff comments and
answered questions of the Cumitteeet Members.
7he Ctumittee Members discussed concerns regarding the repair of the siding
on the Fast side of the building which was in poor repair.
Cxmmittee Members Lim and Lavios stated that the application was
acceptable.
Cx�amittse Member Lavios added thc,t`, the white badaground an the sign should
be clanged to an off-%bite or ivory.
a
` st y.,r.."
page -6- 13, 1902
cmdtbee NeWbW Jackson agrwd.
C21331 felt the app tiaan wet$ acceptable
of sign %" notpart is ,v20,
of th app"cation. ma
OzJgesbEld that the sign Should be
of a ., sj;.
rthe findings and t r. 'ed inwamodasUng, to
FInatng
11 and �nait 9 erne 1® theWWIr and OmAtion 11 a*W to the
toreso as f®alms on MzCV1. a �tim to a dev
1' 7hat � sign ,a as aonclitfaned hw�+ain, is consistent with Title
17 of Code.
izMAEMM
9• 1992
tas is based � sign Crs`erf a dated 24,
may be MMXW by the Conditions emumvftad bmdn
10. Ttne
�he a na color for both the buildin? and d sign s1iall match
vat 2148.
11. Option "2" of sign "B" on the edLtbit is riot
aMlicaticn. as of this
Model resolution vWom ceding aFFrOval of a modification to the
building colors was amendedto add condition 11 to rmd as f®llowss
gm t
11. MW hd1dings wood siding shall be repaired and treated as
7• nol]iCatio �6�2 Ad 74r� �i,r,.aQ o ti ng and
gyp.. Inc
an extericr neon building sign � r� located
Vall00 FBshic�n Pads. The center is located at the nit . of
Stevens C��t Blvd. and Wolfe Road.
Tba Robillarci reviewed the staff coa ments rx*JM staff Is
Omxmn with the
sign and remmueme1ed denial.
Scott
Prop�l�the described the b leading to the sign
Restatarait.
George Britt, Ad Art Signs, explain the signconstruction.
Peter Jcrdca answered questions of the Ommitte e Members.
® Cmmittee Member Jacacson aqoressed
wirndo►a►• signs. cornaem with the brightness of the neon
,fn ,tV
AS�1C 130 1
Paget 7- -
C m aittee Menber : gym stated he was Wt =Mkl ad that thO WLga will
hav
the restaurant, be-,use sales and the number of p3cple In VaUm IS U w and
the variety of food, types, in the fad =Rz t, a&b to the M Es
of the
stated that the is a to the Probim
center.
oommittee Member Ueber stated that VxDonalds is highly visible t= WOl f1a
p,oad. Ha suggested a smaller direct3azi sign may be accede but a neon
sign is too much.
Committee VAnber Lavics agreed with Cmz itter, sma)er Um stating that the
sign is not the solution and may end tqp bating tla cmter m wo than
helping-
In o�,�,,,,.�,,, to Ct�a xper�s���� ie's aeon# r not a notWit' Of the
,.on golden n Otf.6dies, Mrs RdAllard respMxW that they
won Hamie agreed with Committee Member Lim that awing the nem
sign would be the wrong direction for ASAC to follow since the ,majority of
the Ctumittee Members agree that region signs at the mall are not
acceptable.
Chai4 Iimmie, and 0anmittee Metes Lim and Weber agreed that
t2 a non-
mall.
ill�sm .�ted sign or r, attached to the post acing
.trancet, would be an accieptable soluts.+ots to Maids problem.
Decision: Chi a 5-0 vote, with from tt� applicant, AM' 't"'d
this item to an ,, date in �' for the applicant to d�+elc:p a n�trT
sign program for the oenfi r.
slow R *IIA+i
9. Ilt tlo9n 81 004 7n Sign - Discussion of pL—'kimiraaay work
pi cis, goals and objectives.
Hobillard discussed tr~ different options relating to timing for ASAC
review. He stated twatASACneeds to start their meetings at 7:00 P.M. as '
by the gUnic..V j, Code, If AW wants to change it to 7:30 P.M.
then an Oteinance need:, to be approved by the City oaancil. He stated that
if ASAC wants to farm z 1 sub-committee bin I-SACr Chaidber of CCII'C8 and
soma other possibl:a partieiPants that it would be aamptabla to staff as
lrmg as the meetings were held during normal business hours.
John statton, Cupertino chamber of Commerce, discussed the 0,nbers
direction for the sign ordinance and suggested a special committee with
ASAC, almber, staff, .ud otters to be determined- It was discussed among
the Qammittee Members the advantages of having a sub-caamittes. It war-
agreed that a Minute Comer should be bit back to ASAC at th3 neoet
meeting ruing City l'.01 roil to appoint a sub-Ccmmittee for review of
the sign ordinance.
l►-
r:.e : f. ",III• —
r
..ytr
r
Del 0
b
- �-1 it�_.. � .�, �.Y _ • ��`
71. wl
Q .
_ -
y'•{'I' '3 1L:: ••/4d>"7 'i:'s- sr�- .:,�,.y -<':Y:O•. ...:1 ..1-' ;.�"y:` 33�-
If. 1 i1� .ot" 7� f� '3JC1`, �' :'1w.;1(YO`_'. !i< L.J" 'is_:fjiY3'a•. ad' .
(> ^i� "..,•:-Y-. ♦.i.;-, i11.�.�y:;�;, FI" L,G: mifJ� .9a,. O'49..:-�.,1 1 a, �"s�•
Y'il'H :4-�: ",};7s i r` c.rx Y"�r #a.:at'' ,a,•,.. M�`. "
'.7,t.. e,9 ./-:.-1 i f;:•�-t= �, j1:p- Rtir:.yi,"� l -� v' 'Y •`�'J1<.
,f.
1_Yi�a.ii.x,l.E':'l>r: 1 .1,. L-,.1���.iL. /. (;Y: C�'i-i� • a��►._`.�
C - - -it il'•• •p•
- .;t •1 •• .:ul
is ..,•_� .�.•.. �.•>#_ -- Ir- _
�. • '...._�.. •'.•1 : `a till 1 c r',-
j :1 ♦ c !.•-t1.11 -- �,:aIL•-�I - 11. .. •�❑1-'. 3 •►J �- r �,.•_ -
.t`
IMP
d C/ 1 27, 2992
Page 2-
4. implicationTeresa Ommledm - Ra*z sting sedw w dt appraval for
yennmt 1r door dWplays at of
Stevems g
n oditfrq�.��s.�m�*�d. and Do mow Blvd.bq c .. slits is
located at t2m Soutbwwt corner`cm,,�aAWAl3zard the staff a39d of the
OMM dt .
Tevm �go�aVleibied that she was unable to make =ntaft with the
company,
Fi bersta s, who mWwthe fiber' ► ropes.
Om m$ttee Member Lin felt the display was acceptable.
Cionittee Meter cmwern with the clew badJtgrnund. She
stated that a peram does see the bad even though it is clear but
would generally agree with Cumittee Mcdber Lim.
Omwittee Member states tl ' she would vote against the primal.
She does rat see the need for addittml displays wd that the store
already has + •
committee Member Weber stated he does not li1m this type of display and
expressed concemns that it would look like the neon displays, in the
McDmuilds Restaurant.
Ommdttee Mir Hmmi e felt unoaofo rtable with c ombing the app]ication
because of possible obtrznsion. He stated that he was not convinced for the
weed of the sign and that it world not be obtrusive.
It was suggested to the applicant that the proposal either could be
cm*bwed or denied.
Ms. stated that she would rather have it eontizuzed in order to
explore tl%e fiber optic ropes.
CmzAttee Member LwIm offered to help Ms. combiro in contacting
FUxwstass.
On a 5-0 vote - A licatian 9--ASAC-2 was continued to the meeting of May
11, 1992.
I�1 : FUFML REiTM
S. Applicatiara 19-ASAP42 E.J. Imm Assoaj@&ffi - Requesting review and
approval for architecb2 ral, colors, and modifications for an
existing church located on the North side of Bollinger Rd. approximately
680 ft. Wear of Blaney Ave.
Y
Dap -3-
#, L32
tie staff CQ=Mft notAny his with the hUffi
presstwe sSodf n fhftays and aMesbed that the irrigation pUm be
by staff one it in damigred.
NUB Horton, E.J. 10jum Associatm, xvviewed the staff cumda and
answered questioris of the Ommdtbee Newbers.
OMMittar< Member Lavics, Jackson, Wter, .Lain and H=sie found the Fmposal
acceptable.
Deoi.si : on a 5-0 vote - 19-AWC-92 was appvowd according to
the findings and conditions in the made] mesoLution.
6. Apglicatioaa 20nASD -92 Oalifoa s3n*+ - Pequesting review and approval to
modify the colors of a planned sign proWm for an existing restmzant
located at the Northwest oommer of De Anna Blvd. and MoCIsllan Rd.
Tom Dnbillard reviewed the staff marts noting the scope of thePrWasal.
Demitri, Rendev� (life, Wlained that the P above the door would be
all ]black with no stripes.
Jay Dyer, California Sign Co., eMlafned the caollos and the design comept
behind the sign pram.
® Ommittee Member Jaen had no ins with the proposal.
with the wwthering of -�he vinyl
lettering on the sign.
Cao mittee Member LWdos stMasted adding the address nu*ers oat the
=mzent sign.
C7rrmittee Member H ramie eqzessed cairn w°ath the briers of the sign
d►e to its existing height and size.
Committee Memo Jackson asked the applicant to reconsider the palm trees
and gold trim craps on the alien stating that in the past palm trews have not
been an acceptable design for moubers of the coo muni ty.
Dion: On a 5-0 vote - Application 20-ASAC-92 regarding the sign
dam was approved according to the findings and om ditior:a stained in
the model resolution with Condition 1G and it added to read as follow:
cmditions
10. 3he applicant shall add the mabers on the mataa<imment sign,
11. Zhe green palm trees on the signs arr riot awed as part of this
® application.
.. - a v :�.Itt •-f.l ..•s•7 •�-1..
•:i• •: •.1 -
••llll Gli`•'C1 7,� _}-/•k _ '-.Ca ••, s-'�!: - > r. : •1•.._ �..- - _ i1
.1•• ram_ _ .<: . .. a _la• FT ti➢7 �' ••`..ti. •.C.1 ...,••'' ..• <; �. ... -s 1.
♦•'II IC -- Cal•�� •:: >-�• _• -�,•lf'�Cr`
�•.11'.11 -- `il'i•.=f �..Ca•:� -;•i. =�• �:•tlil i.. - =�I1•=f ,.•y:c - �1 •" •
ems; •. •`
ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE MINUTES 2 of 3
1992 & 1993
AMU
"' M
8.
DisMMSiM a goals and
directions for a< Sign tb8s.
'xm Rcbillard presented the Viaaxte Order and Wised the of the
. 7he G=itt s I�Y,aabws then, disoussed tho mwbership of the
Sign ttteey and consIdered� the may, ty of having members��of,�tthey
publiOf c large,
be on the 9� L • it uns ^ Instead
mmbers of the �� an the ttee that the ttes
should hold at least on® public is sessimr.. Alm, M%s-, will hold Public
r+evie ang the prelimirwrY Sign
on a 5-0 vote - Mve date C?r+sub-�ttee was approved � the findings and she ofttee
cmtained in the draft MiTute Order with the following ications:
ZOOM
i. giat the sub-co®nittes will be beneficial to the resident cmMmity.
2. - fry and kusiaass cmmmity will be beneficial to
the sub-ommit-tee, and AS,O in reviewiM the Sign Ordinarce changes.
ggM Of 9A,<kmmdttee
1. The voting membecd4 of the Mb-0=ittee stall om*rise of...
3. The Snb-Cmuttea shall hold one public input session in -Aden to gain
direction and insight from the public for the sign arditanve d angel
By cis of all ASAC mks, C=ittee Member Hm sie and Committee Member
Lim were d=n to be the ASAC rqz es., tatives on the signSub-committee.
The Ommittaie Members discussed possible gmls and objectives for items which
need to be reviewed by the sign arsdinanoe ittse. Items z ed for
discussion are as follows:
* issue of enforcement of noaT cmxforming signs
* the definition of signs to add illuminated or new
signs
• impact of interior signs that are dire..ted tamft streets
• ivaaact of window signs
Ff-,'`1 A Jr3' a k �li
Yx � 5
:91,r 2992
timing of sign qwLvvals• � wall
the
review J�nvcess
signs versus belojht of signs
MICS the Mtdnance UN , Cam,
* pre 2b]a and easy to read bir agglamts iad panic
swbmit tat crilEria
* Ysigns, per, and bmwrs
dirseotion for the ardirgam to be mare tnnifewmadi tbwou0mat the
City ratbrx ided Into distidcts
anew the than anzaval of mayor sign dhanges
Overall goal of sign aerdinanoe is to adequately identify businesses so as to be
successful without degrading the aestheLIc appearance of the city.
CW
9. The mir� of the regular meeting of April 13, 2992 were app road with the
following modlificat im
Page 5, Item 6, fourth paragraph, replace C mdttee Member Webw enzessed,
with, Ihe Committee Membeur z discussed.
Page 7, add, after the third parawaph, In response to Clranirpersorn die'6
question of the legality of the nee golden ashes sign, Mr. &JAllard
reqxrded that they were not legal..
Oa mittee Member vwxw eotpressed c anoezn regarding the number of mean sires in
the new liquor store on Bk. d Road and De Anza Blvd.
Committee Member Iavias asked staff to have applic wets pent colored mac
copies and/or provide specific color chip exanples for all Cwmittee Members.
Committee Member Bain asked staff to look into the weed Pint along Parlett
Place and Basaneo Drive.
Chairperson Hcoole asked staff to look into plarntirrg the vines which were
required to be planted on the McClellan wall.
ChanVerson Huxsie also stated that he has been with meeting with
the Mayor to dismiss the items as previously requested.
' OF
Tm Rabillard stated that Yiassco°s Pastaurarnt had appealed the ASAC decision
and is s&A&Iled for the City omnail meeting of May 4, 1992.
Itu Webw stated that he would attend the meeting and a-rower questions as
required-
+r.
k � .�� l.j.�y a-� a'� -_ .i ask...♦ .,t t- -
►It •i -r- -
AN
Js
r
u, a
CAr91 ®F CUPBRTINO
i �p
y 1° , Li * IX 95M4 (408) 2 505
no SME AVFWML � SM Cr2V OF COMM I=
��ggyyIS�Y� 11, 1g9�9g2ps .. yp g y y�MM MR /��MW Af �5�+�
CM iai L, Ii 1F 300 iVe{iM 4f7►J;i=t , �d7iri�'idLSb= 014
the meeting was called to order at 7:10 l.M. by C '1 'r PAbert Smage.
MSS 3 Smade, Lire, Weber, and lavios
Mks A Jbdson
Staff P It= Dillard, Pla ner n
JDO MBIGEMC
1. AVqJ 3-V-!92 01240M PEA - tipq E'+,Am and
appro; to modify as sign, po�.= to � email Stye locates at be S�st
corner of C Blvd. and BIanW Ave.
2. AEpl i 9-ASPJ"2 'dot - paquesting r -im and appvmral for
a paimmumt windw disPPlay at an eldsting shoPPing . the sits is
located at the Soutbuest corner of Stevens Creek Blvd. and Do Ann Blvd.
® On a 4-0 vote It®s 1 and 2 were amtbiled to the meeting of May 26, 1992.
3. City 99 e'ht>er ;hM Sign c�diaranros Si g% 120 - Finalize directive of Sign
ttee.
nu Robflza rd explained why the Minute fir, to the City mil, was
tarn off the agenda for the last City Cauroi.l vesting.
lire committee Umbers expressed disaRpo3nI rx 1 1 with the wig of the
Minute order. On a consensus, the committee menbers astted to bwop the
Minutes order refers to the City Cavrcil. amain. 2W asked that the
goals and objectives, as c.*JAned in the memorandum, 4ated May 7, 1992, be
sent as well.
7y stated that the meinarandum of the goals and objectives was well donee
and aMested suction j and k be added to Objective 1 of coal 3 stating,
"specific definitim of a sign", and "amortization of non-oonforming
Ape, be added. it was also discussed that a copy of the goals and
objectives be sent to the C3maber of Commerce for their Sian 0minittee to
review.
C mdttes Member Iavioe stated thst the Model Ordinance in the Sign
Fegulation Hook, pot out by the APA, was a good Starting poir c.
It was also discussed among the Committee Members that the Sign Ordinance
should be kept simple with simile forms for sign size and
number of signs.
rs „t+2'� " .`�.' 3 u-`i`a a �''1::'r "5 :�"'" - .,�.. - es,.5�" Y "1"`�b�4ry.•` D 5.
y
e•r
-P•a" - _sue •1# rs.
J' � ;' .i.•Ilat -' =:IP.►'=-T c ', ta• -1 ':.. -+1 -•. • • .I - M, �'. a- Y•1'.
�•:.YICIF. G C:IT•.:a IF a•I G • rl_. -
TV
:
off
A. 77Z
M- is I' • _ ..: ..� .l' -�.P • �I:�,. ..,.•_.� _ •: - •.: i..-a
.7 •rvv7• Lt -
�.•1' - :J •'^ •'tom•11: -.
.a,
it �:=
iK,1.i.. Y•L`:'1" ,,I..a 1 �Y#'A'Jij i. •� vh. / �.''`i jf t; .i.- 7 : x: ..-il.;.
-',CI' ��., !I' 4.,1" :'?.9r'61 :• �17L� 1,.' ii;9` i.,;� sa.t14�:��. �.:�':.
,•♦ 1 ."tt�i," !'_ 1:.,1V: _HST.. ®It .�11*CY`-.J. i •`-'
y. ;1Diad Y ' :;iH?: e. f'. -.f•.i"�"Y� ;ri^ '.b r:
y .�.. �.� 1 P -1.•.^�"t. � :i J^ c.-IJ`�&J. `;io%a ,.:+. i'+•l'?.l l�•.: i
�.y. `.:• .ID 15 �.:�• / 1` �xl� •: 4'i ai6+:1 ; o •:Yr;�,
•It '•..- '• •- - G• _ fir.•.-.. •� ►•. •1'.
��•'IPIl III•_ •.' =� � - � ;�•••J •. -
- • •. �.• s- •• - - - • = _- :•. :• .•III. - -
M -
f!_t
-2"
Matto
10. Us facia backgrOu's1 ill be a unify off-mite Ocacc.
3. Am oPaTAO&AM review and approval
for an OOWI= sign at an existing restaurant ]mated. at Va11co lam
Park. 210 site is ]mated at the rmthwOst =nor. of Stems DIvid.
and Wolfe Rd.
2tn RObillard presented the staff rq= t noting AMC's direction from the
part �t$ng a� romanded appowal..
G8nrge Britt, Ad Art sip, and eso t .-Uy4n, y4om lds, reviewed staff
comments and answered questions of the ®an®ittee rues.
Committee Member Lin stated that the was acceptable.
Committee Member Jad(Sw questioned the lighting sauce for the sign and
stated that the application was acceptable.
Committee Member Weber stated that the sign was acceptable and expressed
concern with the illegal winolaw signs.
chairperson Foie, felt that the sign was acceptable and also expressed
Cmwern regarding the illegal window signs.
It was discussed amOng the COMMittee Members that a condition should be
added that the neon golden axis sign facing the parking lot would be
acceptable and that the neon golden arm facing Wolfe Rd. be
removed prior to issuance of building permits.
Decision: Cn a 4-0 vote, applic aticc 16-AS C-92 was approved atom ding to
the findings and conditions stained in the Model Resolution with Ccnditim
10 and 11 added to read as follows:
10. shal Odsting l non—raf 'To den pia si;" facing Wolfe Yid.
d prior to issiance of building permits.
11. 2be existing neon "Olden Arr?les" sign facing the parking lot is
approved as part of this application,
Fteva�
4. Apali tion 22-ASAC-92 S MgDtec ggM - gequesting review a j approval to
nmdif a planned Development sign Program for an existing office building
located at the northwest corner of 2brre Ave. and Rodriguez Ave.
Tom Rcbillard reviewed the staff cmwnts noting which signs being
replaced and which One was being added.
•SIP 11 __ C:II•- •�. _
. .•=r•
6.411 it IMF-
7 Mm
— l4
ell
•'.1 . ._.
h
•.•.'l ill. _- III•- .... •r - •" •
.•- _..• ':•)a, - •mil. ,_� c• ••. �_.
�•. -rJ• ..M •� =-ter+- .1'.• .a:.' c•A =-. t a..' '...'-✓Il �:
1
__ �CaU�- tt - ��1-. �h'ti.�• -•'r.-`r.__. .r f i.-.' ��•:!1`'.4� -al� - 1„
t►�•:1tal _
- ...: _ .;a = u r l rtl- :F r .1. — - .r . . - :�._. - , �r. i rrl:=r _ •r
=�It,
1. • 7
• 5t' ' 51 •.a'. Jl.
'{1` ;}s �" L'::f r.FS?C`tA •}�^a "a.. :.. •}" :E'.IC • 'ii1.i# Y��,.�,v�.;.,
it .y � �.��.t ., i<•-: I iXc Y:r`' ed' kaw itK. ��., ♦�} ..�31►"H ,;• �,,
1
41
•7.
-77
i 1 •. •.•.IP{I - l J •-.. ram" •. i - • -
d fill
' J• • _ i• 'l.•��.: 1. •.II fit•• •.. :• `.• .=1
e�� a { ram, .,h I J•r ^'�r .y.s` r 3,
=7.`=::.» •'wl-. �._. .,.•. i �.V. G• 1.= -••fb:.• r•"�_ _ ".R :r3 •y,Iwo
- .�. .. • • ...•:•".i=
:.►'•ice•.-. :.r.' - w). - •7 :-
. k"_ ."•U. �iT.• :'••y is _ _ _• ', - Div".• .,r..., ., ..� :•......• '.,•- 'e= �.`'c .: � ,.
•T--..•fir._T. ►'� •. ;: y-. y-�_ � -- ",•:. ., rt"'.sue •l •.s: ✓:••• •
• 2 -w I I ow •1
•J
_ ;.. �, .', -_ _..• .,. .,� •- • ,. .•': `.:� 1, •). ..��^.r.-.�"�� '•. � .^ ^ '•:.1.. ._
-.�4v- •' � II:.. r- .:.II-_" •.,• •: - •'s; + : •; tir a 1 411 -I ._• � --
�•lIP 1 :.:> •- _•Ll E-- _• I•• - •1 _•.,: _ a). •: HIV
,. � '�i*`,.:�^Ex"x-+,�fskip ?�•�x#• � �.,lax .�-Xy* � �.+t':.
tir _tR`
1
ati �p
in
'64 it
1j 1
t
VA
- � �:_ 1 "ram' ,�.,- ,�.._ .^-�^�Y'^�a• ==>t. ' �,a -a�' "a'�-`�f - - �„ ,. -
f:��'1'1 +`�.`i: :.: 5' lip: `.f�' ^r"J;Y{`o v.. e'.•^;6 t: ,:.4 .,t; '.,;1
,/ =i<ftY' ie •.i yI �:;��' s;' i .t' sA':it" �-' .-tam 'l .a a �;
M.Y .J5 _ t s+..) •'+`i' � } ✓°I'!J" #a.{r'S`�Y.r .e r •"�'a',�. !!: ,! •• �:
� _ ly�.' is Grp :••: s7 •a. 1 tj.". :a. c �°• ,.
�-z fit...- ;►'..
Ni
Erg
��-•:.1r • ."��:•y�Int41�t�1,.�f.� �. • 1:1: i'_ .�.>,.t `::z
S�C�L flu
a'• _ ✓:S:_, .1 mot^ .r ,r�•,1-7_,i- _ �•.1'� t:'�".^'_'1 r,2. :>'it
' t. 1. i--• - P :•; - - ;:.:.=r - - r•Ii7 t1_d -� s •. - .ws _�_], =c • r.1= - ,rl
Owl
4 5J
MR
x?t a^ r
Mom.'
er
22# 1992
pap 2—
2. 1- 92 AAA in the - Fopiesting Infdrmal review of a Use
Permit to demob. h an existing building and aNstruct a now 2,848 sq. ft.
�fast
L--foo�d� restaurant. 7his site is looated. at the of Stevem
Creek Bland. and Saidi Why.
Zb® Robillard reviewed the past plans and design schomes leading up i1A this
Virginia far*AU, Wilt Goodseal and Say Mojica, Jadc t i the Bois, intraduued
the project, discussed the assign aonoept and mmiezed questions of the
committee members.
Commies Member Weber reiterated his past view point that the bW lding
should be moved back on the lot. :ie expressed concern with the 1+Narth and
We-at elevations stating that the wallsa need to be broken up with,
landscaping of different arrlaital details. He stated that
them-
should be no mmument sign.
Committee Member Jackson stated that she would rather see wood siding than
stucco. Sloe stated that landscaping and an arbor should be placed along
the West and North elevats wn.
Committee Member Levies weed with Ommittee WAmrs Jackson and Weber
regarding the need to x A the wrap. plans an the North and West
elevations.
Committee Air Lim stated that the design of the building :is good. He
expressed concern with the amount of shoo® on the tawer Gdoments and
suggested that red tiles be placed on the walls to help break up the
stucco. He stated that the bike rao m in front of the building make the
building look more like a fast-food restaurant. Lastly, ha expressed
cow that if the restaurant is approved, large amounts of signs, flags
and banners should not be installed.
- -irpeYson Hmmie stated that the design is moving forward and the
architecture and is good. He agreed with the other Committee
ors that trellis and vises dwuld be added on the North and West
elevations. Lastly, he expressed concern with the toner element stating
that they are goo big.
John Volckman, owner of the Stevens Creek Office Building, stated that the
bu�ildug may look fine in Palm Springs but is port the look that Oapertinno
should be excepting into their city. He stager', that he is very cord
with the amount of trash and litter which may be produced by fast-food
restaurants. Lastly, he stated that the building is not in keeping with
the Grand Blvd./Parkway cat for 04mrtino.
Mt. Nojica suggested that a maintenance agreement could be developed
requiring that Jack in the Bans keep the site clean. In response to
Committee Mwber Jackson's question, Mr. Mojica explained that t
Incurs of gwraticn are from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.
i
• n It.�9 1� 1 a�P� ' a zedw Page
3• for an q at Lbe
V of Stevens Creek� m�aa WiR>� sign
un rid raviewa
the staff acmuffft and argwimed qpesticm of tb--
cMllifb 'bMee, VASUbm.yqV gi
jM am
4,, •
the
time application•
6+ZY l itte. VM&W wbw stated he wlW2 d tacit SUPPOrt t W a s
Decision: on a 4-3. vote, With Cmittw Mwber
� � aYmd
2 C 92 �1i p► 2 aY 3 ar
®oa�itfo� nanta d A :
ti�on it
Eindim
2. "at the SIM is for i! ifcatfcO
to f
3.
That 08 new W=IcW 'ay Win not setaWWeftm
but i
, $an will be egaltmated at that tim.
n. Me aRAIcant sball wcxk with the owner of the sbgVi
4. on a 5-0 vats the minutes of the regu armetingof Mm a, 1992 were
as submitted.
In respcjWto CXumitt s Nor Jac kscm's question, Mr. Rabillar+d eoalaiawd the
timing of when the meetings may start at 7:30 P.M.
c=ittee pbmut the rg m sib at the
Cmter and wWrewed ern regarding the' "A" sign at Fmt&M'G-
Camittee Member Iaviae stated that Castro meet in Mcuntain view sews to
have a very qwd sign Program.
c mmittee Member fir eqwessed conoern regw'Un9 tim Oaks YAMWMt SUP, Taco
Bell, Yiasso's and %b m sign Pr •
a -
'16,,
• jR
f
•115 L _.� .1 r .
Ap CIO
14
0015
h"
•�I 'M 4W
r�
r
1030 AVM, CaMMMv j7j 95014 (408'
OFF FMMM MEN= (V2HE �e
• AND ME AP'PA0TAL OF 9M CZN OF MAW= FOR
JMY 13, 1992, MMM =0 IN QMOMMM MM At
7hiS meting Vas called to ardsr at 7:eO5 P.N. by Chairperson Bowie.
ML
Yfinbers Absent: None
Staff Present, Ttm Robillard, Planner 11
None.
Zett$2 from Howardyy n itemi No. 2.
s M NUMUM
2?-AS�2 Santee 9M. - Requesting review and approval to
modify a Planned Development Sign Progm for an existing office building
loc3ted at the Nast corner of TWre Ave. and Rodrigues Ave.
Tcm Robillard revisaed tbe staff CCOMMft noting that the sign is the same
sign as presented at the last mee,`famg. He reviewed YMCess oonoamns, as
aqpressed at the last meeting.
MdUP Wire, Matrix Design , reviewed staff comments and maw z eed questions
s
Of the Ommittee Members. He stated that Symenbec will be the only tarot
and that the old sign prow= will be replaced if and uhm spmantec
leaves. He described the purpose and intent of the sign program and
rdesign.
•ft y Fella, &jmw ac Corp., described the corps ations pzposee and needs-
Wayland Lim abstained from vatinrg an this apgaliaatian due to being a reaen"
fa mw employee of Symantec. Mt. Lim spoke as a member of the p1blic. Re
stated he was diasappointed that *mantec did not modify the sign. He
reiterated his past cmxmrm regarding th!,; flexibility of design and stated
that the sigh simuld be rednc:ed in size.
�b y9 � ^q
` ,��,. '� •" ', �"} �, - '` liar_ - '�' P�^;s,. '
I WOMEN Fa I M. IN
• � 4C�7 � iiiiT i�G
PaP —3—
findinp and amsfi7ticm contained In tto model resolutim with condition
nine zoWied to read as follan:
amdtim
9. 7 he anavval is be4d upmvMrIa=S plan eot 4-V-92 (5 ) z+ ised
JUy 1, 1992 and a sicced p oLitim fan adjoining awnem in
favor of the project a9 Bney M ananded by conditicas
(7n a 9-0 vote the minutes of the repilar meeting of atus 22, 2992 were approved
as submitted.
Cmuittes ituaer Lim expressed ern repNUM Tam Bell Restaurant signs.
2ta Ocircular 9latiow sigra and tally Dean's political. sign still posted on
North Do lea Blvd.
otitt®e Ned3er Jackson asked staff to bring ma's, shatdies and
apWavalLs fram the maple R & D Maps to the next meeting.
cmmfttee Nember weber expressed cow reqjmmUng the Town oar and Taco
Sell sib.
son asked when ASW will start their sign review ptooem.
cwmittse Bar Lim expressed aoenomm rewding wad abatement at the
fallowing locaticm: �.y�
1. D�ut Meal (in he rear)
2. Texaco Statim (Steen Coesk Blvd. and De Anna Blvd.)
3. S-ell statim (Stever tic Blvd. and Wolfe Ed.)
Q Ow
None.
/''S`.. 3/ '.`
r=
�.
�,,;.�
_ S.:ry�
a..'.'�°� .r.�y'
�'• .l
� �'�
/ f
l` __ ,�
,1fci
a � � /.
N :-:,
�:, �.
� <},
",
.w•. � �Y(t`:
�,�
�..
a:
q
1 a ,
ML'3si Ir•l
#C —
IW
12 • aal•a'fL1 ;i r�
e
i � �•a .11r 1 ., -
M
• o
i
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPE11TINO,CALM)RNIA 35014(.408)252-4505
b4DR 1`ES OF THE REGULAR bOMMO OF THE ARCHIIMCTURAL .AND SITE
APPROVAL COMMPI TEE OF THE OTY OF CUPERTINO FOR. AUGUST 24, 1992,
MEETING HELD IN CONFi RENCE ROOM A,CITY HALL,AT
10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALWORMA
The meeting was called to order at 7:32 P.M.by Chairperson Hoxsie.
II®LL CALL
Members Present: 1loxsie,Weber, Lim
Members Absent: Lavios and Jackson
Staff Present: Thomas R. Robillard,Planner 11
POSTPiCI IAIYJII STO T=AgENDA ORA
--None.
WKLI`I-E AND VEM"lCDM1Vii2TICA1'J0AS
-- None.
IrO.IAL RRVdE : ME RIMMSS
1. Application 27-ASAC7!-9-2 Sabrina-The Day Spa,- Requesting review and approval for a
planned development sign program to an existing commercial building located on the North
side of Stevens Creek Blvd. approximately 430 feet West of Vista Dr.
Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments noting the height and size of the proposed
sign.
V vni Burgess, Osten Sign, answered questions of the Committee Members.
Committee Member Weber, had no comnitnts regarding the proposed sign.
Committee Member Lim, and Chairperson Moxise, expressed concern with the 36" high
letter.
ASAGMMU MS lint 24,19E
Page-2-
It was discussed among the Committee Members the sign program for the building should
other tenants in the building request signs.
DECISIOIeI
On a 3-0 vote, Application 27-ASAC-92 was approved according to the findings and
conditions contained in the Model Resolution with conditions 10 and I I added to read as
follows:
Condi ions
10. Signs for future tenant:;shall be centered on the facia band above the tenant space
and limited to 70%of the tenant frontage. The letters shall be limited to 24 inches.
11. The color pallet shall be shiny gold viral letters.
I FORMAL RE31f A
2. Application 91 004 120 Sign Ordinance update - To review final direction for the Sign
Ordinance Review Committee.
It was suggested by the Committee Members that flags be added to Item I; and on page 2
an additional Item L be added to read "Garage Sale Signs". There was a consensus among
the Committee Members that the goals and directives reflected ASACs wishes for the
direction of the Sign Ordinance Review Committee.
APPROVAL OF MIMIC M
3. On a 3-0 vote, the minutes of the regular meeting of August 10, 1992 were approved as
submitted.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
The following items were brought up by the Committee Members for staff to address: 1) Feed
abatement behind the Donut Wheel, 2) The large amount window signs and "MusicNideo" sign
at the Warehouse, 3) Town Center Sign Program,4) The 24-hour neon sign at Taco Bell, 5) The
YMCA bingo sign, 6) The sign for _ Iandarin Books at T'..: Bottegas Center, 7) Landscaping at
the Southeast corner of Stevens Creek and De Anaa Bivds.
�y�y��
ws
A$A .,+o Auger 24,19
.ftv.3.
They al%j MMUMW and mWessed their coke WO the amouM of slPS being placed at the
Sports Center steel tl�at Cupertino*Wd be held by its own r r siSns a w*' the
Committee?Aembm diwassUl the SyMtec sign APPp •
E—FOO T OF S ['E
_None
At 8:40 P.M. to the text rogtlar meeting of September 14, 1992,7:30 P.M.,Conference Room A
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
r
Thomas R. Robillard Archit. and Site Approval COMM
Planner E
ATTEST:
Doro y Co us,City Clok
Msw/AMM924
-I T I W-M
f.
a CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 1r
0RRE AVENM CWWWO,CAUFORI'UA 95014(40 252.4_
M OF THE R MWMG OF THE
C7't11tAL ARID SrM APPROVAL
IN
COMMMM OF THE Cny OF '17 O FOR AIBt3=10,1992,Ml'�'Mr—,�RI?lA
CO OM A,CONFERENCE ROM C1TX HALL,AT 10300 AVENUE,CUpER O'
ne meeting was called to order at 7:30 PAL bgr Chairperson Hoxsie.
ROLE ALL
Members Present: Home.We i,Lavios,Lim,Jackson
Members Absent: Alone
Staff Present: Thomas R.Robillard,Planner H
PtAST1'O NTS/A1liITSTMP.NTS TO T AER
G ORD
—Alone.
WitiTTRPI AN19 Vp;,RBAL C`t �i�'g`I® S
— Alone.
pQRi19AL RRV1E : OLD USd1VRSS
e�m c•+rnantec Corn. • R� View, and ePPraW to modify a Ph8v
1. Application 22-AS. fo an existing office building located at the northwest corner,of Tare Ave.
Development Sign program ;
and Rodrigues Ave.
Tom Robiliard rem w�staff comments noting that the�aplifi nt would explain the modifications from
the last submittal and stated that stab's mommendation 4d.
Design,stated that they have reduced the impact of lighting and stag that in order to
Philip Wire,Matrix ons wmp and public perception of the company, than the
meet the clients needs. Project remained
r ����Sam-
Wayland
and shape of the sign
on icatitur. However,he spoke as a member of the public.
Wayland Lira abstainer news ,the dui and suggested that the circle and the oblong holes be
He stated that the Height would remain but would look hen like a floppy disk. He stated that
removed He slated that the shape as the existing sign'
sign"A°should be one-sided and in the same Position
Committee Member Lavtos stated that she would have the same concerns'meats as last time and that slo was
disappointed that the applicant had not addressed any Of ASACs
Committee Member Jackson felt that Wayland Lines suggestion for removing the holes was goal She
suggested reducing the amount of lighting.
Committee Member Weber stated that he is still disappointed in the sign and his comments would rfeemWn
the same as past meetings and would recommend denial.
Chairperson Home stated that removals of the circle and oblong holes
wocicoul beereduced.significant
difference in the image the sign portrays. He stated because of that the sign ght
•° � �exW
ASAGMINUTES August 10,1992
Page-2-
Mr. Wire stated that he could reduce the size of the signs by six inches and still keep the 1 s large
enough to read and in porportion to the sign.
Committee Member Weber moved to deny the application. The motion died for lack of a second.
IDECISID
On a 3-1 vote, with Committee Member Weber desoenting and Committee Member tam abgahft Application
22-ASAC-92 was approved according to the findings and conditions contained in the Model Resolution with
Condition 9 modified and Condition I0, 11 and 12 added to read as follows:
Condition
9. The approval is based upon the sign criteria plan set dated August 3, 1992 with the addition of the
burgmddy color sample except as may be amended by the conditions enumerated herein.
In The maximum height of the sign shall be six feet as measured from the base of the sign
11. The circle and the oblong holes shall be removed from the sign.
12. Sign°A"shall be a single face sign located in the same position as the existing monument sign
BUSIIVElgB:
2. Application 2LASAC-92 Mandarin GoUnag - Requesting review and approval for architectural
modifications to the existing restaurant located at the southwest corner of De Anna Blvd.and Awes Dr:
Mr. Robillard reviewed staff comments noting the scope of the architectural modifications He gtated
staffs only concern was with the location of the monument sign and that it should be moved outside the
sidewalk side triangle.
Committee Member Lim expressed concern with the sign stating that he felt that the Committee needs
more information as to the size and color of the letters and that he feels the lettering is too small compared
to the sign. He asked for pictures of existing signs of existing Madarin Gourmet restaurants and stated a
preference for externally illuminated signs. He Stated that he had no problems with the architectural
modifications.
Committee Member Lavios stated she has no problems with the architecturai modifications and likes the
proposal to upgrade the building. She suggested, however, that the trellis be left a natural wood color
rather than being painted. She also expressed some concern regarding the color palette and that the colors
are too close and sutdc to have a good contrast. She agreed with Committee Member Lim's comments
regarding the sign and stated the address should be on the sign. She stated she prefers external
illuminated signs.
Committee Member Jackson agreed with Committee Members Lim and Lavios and stated she has a
preference for externally illuminated signs.
Committee Member Weber stated that the address should be on the sign and that the sign should be
externally illuminated
Chairperson Hoxsie agreed with the improvements to the building and agreed with the other Committee
Members regarding the sign
d
boom
-R
AsAMNLMES August
Pap 3-
11 I
On a 5-0 vats,application 26-ASAC-92 was approved accarding to the findings and conditions contahW
in the Model Resolution with Conditions 10 and 11 added to read as follows:
COMM
10. The sign program is not approved for this application and shall return at a future dam
it. T'ae trellis work stall not be painted but left natural wood color.
APPROXAL OF MITES
3. On a 5.0 vote, the minutes of the regular meeting of July 13, 1992 were approved with the following
modifications:
Page two under item one,Chsirpersca Hoxsie stated he was disappointed that no changes were Made to
the application as directed by ASAC. He expressed concern with the large floppy Aisle as being the focal
point and stated that it should be reduced In size to make less of a focal point. He stated if more tenants
are added to the building then the sign program should return to ASAC. Lastly,he stator that the addiesg
numbers should be piz-^ed on the Torre.Avenue sign and that a color chip should be brought to ASAC.
Page three under Committee Reports, Committee Member Lim expressed concern regarding weed
abatement at the following Dons:
1. Donut Wheel(in the rear) 2. Texico station(Stevens Creek Blvd.and De Anna Blvd.)
3. Shell station(former one at 4. The minutes of the regular meeting of July 27,1992
Stevens Creek Blvd,and Wolfe Rd.) were accepted by consensus.
i
C01Di1Ir'ME HAPOMS
Mr.Rabillard reporated our the progress toeing made with Taco Bell,Pima Hut and the McClellan wall.
Committee Member Lira expressed concern regarding the landscaping planting for the park area at the southeast
corner of Stevens Creek Blvd.and De Am Blvd.
Committee Mealber Jackson announced that Nancy Hertert has been very III and that a group of citizens are
getting together to plant a tree at McClellan Ranch Park in her honor.
REPORT Off'ST—&—
Mr. Robilla d reported that the City Council will act on the Sign Ordinance Sub-committee at the meeting of
August 17, 1992.
ADJOPRNMENT
At 8:45 P.M.to the next regular meeting of August 24, 1992,7:30 P.M.,Conference Room
P D APPROVED BY: -
Thomas R. billard Robert HOXSie
Planner H Chairperson,Aieldicafiml and Site Approval Committee
ATTEST•
r
Doroth Comelidd,City Clerk
MMAMIN818
•` yy 5ni
NO
t I o300 TORRE AV ME,CtAftIN4 CALI CIA 95014(408)2ZO
MINtT s OF THE REGULAR bUMTIIW OF THE ARCs&.tECTURAL AND ME AMOVAL
�i COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUMTINO FOR MnSWER,14, 1942,NMTING
qELD IN CONIFEMCE ROOM A.MY HAM,AT
10300 TC1ItRE A CUPERTINO �CALIFORMA 954�14
The meeting was called to order at 7:38 P.M. by Chairperson Hoxsie.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Hoxsie,Lavios, Lim
Members Absent: Weber and Jackson
Staff Present: Thomas R.Robillard,Plann"11
POSTIPON§hg TS AND�I1 JUIXMEN�_IQ in A fiKVA CIIhIAEIi
- None
WRIXFEN AND VERRA_L-gOMMUNICATTOIgS+
None
CONSENT C& /
1. Ar, ication 12-ASAC-92 2 Bank of America-Requesting review and approval to add an automatic
teller machine to an existing bank located on the North side of Stevens Creek Blvd. approximately
150 ft. East of Bandiey Drive.
DECISION
On a 3-0,vote,the Consent Calendar was approved.
NEW y 1S In ormal Review
2. Application 9-U-92 Charles Fang-Requesting early review of a Use Permit to construct a new 2,496
sq. ft. commercial building located on the East side of Peninsula Avenue approximately 50 ft. North
of Stevens Creek Blvd,
Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments noting that staffs concerns w-re with conformance of the
Monta Vista Guidelines as outlined in the sta- report.
Fuhuan Ho, Project Designer, stated that she had revised the drawings in order to address staff
comments s izin the exception of the hipped roof elements. She stated that most of the buildings in the
® Monta Vista area had gabbled roofs and presented photos showing that was,the rase.
Mr. Robillard confirmed that the Monts. Vista Design Guide Lines allcvwed both tripped or gobbled
roofs.
x.
x r
ASAC MINUTES Septanber 14, 1992
Page-2-
Committee Member Lim expressed concern with the left elevation stating that it was quite stark in
appearance. He asked that a color and material board be submitted as well as a light f3x<'um an sheet.
Committee Member Lavios stated that she liked the design of the building but prefers the first
scenario rather than the revision for its architectural appearance and massing ofthe second story. She
stated there are many options for treatment of the left elevation that are economical, low maintenance
and effective, including redwood or metal trellis, changes in materials, or architectural details. She
stated'.hat she would like to see a landscaping aid irrigation plan; a color and material board and a
lighting fixture cut sheet. The applicant should think about signs for future tenants. Lastly, she stated
that regardless of which design was approved, that the oak tree should be saved.
In response to Chairperson Hoxsie's concern regarding saving the elm tree. Ms. Ho stated that an
arborists report is being done to assess the health of the trees on the site.
Chairperson Hoxsie, expressed concern with the closeness of the building to the adjacent residents,
especially the second floor and with the side and front setbacks.. He stated that he would like to see
wood siding rather then stucco siding, stating that it goes better with the Monta Vista Design
Guidelines. He also stated that he preferred the first scenario but would like to see the second story
flipped and moved to the right side of the building. Chairperson Hoxsie stated that it will make the
building appear less imposing on the street, and the tree will still be able to be saved. Also, it will
cause less of an intrusive impact ca the adjoining residents and have better architectural treatment.
FORMAL REVIEW
3. Application 28-ASAC-92 Frank and Rosalind Cardia - Requesting architectural review and approval
for a storage container behind an existing shopping center located on the East side of De Anaa Blvd.
approximately 125 ft. South of Silverado Ave.
Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments and explained that ASAC's review of the proposal is for
architectural appearance only and the use of the container is being dealt with by the Planning
)epartment. He stated that staff is recommending denial of the storage container.
Frank and Rosalind Cardia addressed the Committee Members and explained that the use of the
container is essential to the operation of their business. They suggested a compromise by placing the
container along the Northeast corner of the site, making it invisible to the adjoining residences by
lan6caping or along the side of the building on the North property fine.
Susan Adrian, an adjoining resident, stated that the big issue is noise and not necessarily the
appearance of the container. She stated that she is very concerned with the use of the buildings as a
light industrial uses rather than retail sales. Her concern was regarding the noise generated by the
plumbing shop, kitchen shop, and the the shop.
Committee Member Lavios, clarified the noise, appearance, and location of the container.
al
F
f
ASAC hINUM fttmbw Id, I992
P e-3-
Hn response, the applicant stated that app the.Horse as not being generated by the container but probably
from the equipment in the shop and$Om the other shops in the center.
Committee IV ember Lim stated that the appearance of the container would be acceptable if placed in
the Northeast corner of the site. He expressed concern that the larger problem with the uses at the
center seems to be with the landlord and that the landlord should be involved in this prods.
Chairperson Hoxsie felt that the container was an inappropriate use and expressed cones with the
disturbances with the neighbors. He stated that he cannot support the exception for the container.
Committee Member Lim moved to deny the application
Chairperson Hoxsie seconded the denial for discussion purposes..
Committee Member Lavios stated that she was uncomfortable with denying the application and would
rather see it continued in order to be oonvinced that the container will not Snake the situation worse.
She stated that if the storage container will keep the business in operation, then she does not have a
problem with approving the container as long as the situation is not made worse.
Committee Member Lien stated his motion for denial was bec aup of the use and disturbances Wised
® by tie container and that they should be heard at the City Council level.
® The motion for denial was rescinded.
DECISIOI�T
On a 3-0 vote, the application was continued to the meeting of September 29, 1992 for the
Committee Members to determine whets;whetl;7, a different location for the storage container would be
more acceptable and to see if the disturb;-aces from the center can be mitigated.
ALMOVAL OF MMTES
4. On a 3-0 vote,the minutes of regular meeting of August 24, 1992 were approved as submitted.
CONiMY'>1"ME REPORTS
Committee Member Lim discussed the letter he hRd written to the Council Members regarding the
Symantec sign application.
The Committee Members discussed eliminating the use of the word "Hit List" for code enforcement referrals.
Committee Member Lavios discussed the meeting Bob Hoxsie and herself had with the Mayor
Sorenson and Council Member Dean.
Chairperson Hoxsi,- discussed the Sign Ordinance Review Committee mating and asked staff to send
all ASAC Members the agenda and staff reports for the Review Committee meetings. He expressed
ASACUMUMS -
Page 4-
of r ' ' on • may.he d with
concern with tho p . ,up at the Sign
the signs at the Sport
C uw stag that . with terse -=
Or .wm thew Comnium by i e"6vmws in the
commift-
REpORLOF STAP'
Pion
ABDJtA�1�11'6�1�T
At 9:50 P.M.to the next regealat meeting of September 2g, 1��3`Z,7:30 P.M.,Conference ROOM A
PREP r,EI9 BY: APPROVED BY:
o r
on
Thomas obillard 4iW
and Site Approval COmu ittee
Planner II
ATTEST:
Dorothy Co elves
City Clerk
ASMIN914
M
R.
WPM
zr
CITY '� "
A10300 T
te.�RRTWO,CAI WORMA 9SA14(4�r �4 0S
P REGULAR G OF THE ARC l`ECTi1RAL SrM APPROVAL
ORRE
Nm%qmO lg a 1992. MO
CO O$'1`M CffY OF C OLTINO FOR,
Una IN ROOM Ao C ' y�AT
10300 TORRE AMM CLJI ERTWO CALIFORNA 95014
The meWra was called to order at 7:36 PIC by Can
RQ1,I�,f'AL
Members Present: Hoxst%i WAM 1AM Vile
ber
Members Abe: 8acksm
Staff
Present: Thomas R.Robillsad,Planaer II -
��'�"�Ar11ID AlC' g... -
AROM
ara a�
None
�wt a�tt�CA'1'il�tT+l�
- None
�1tRto►�AI.�tE�iE�
- mug recommener behin daions and
1. of a storage c,;�tttainn
d an existing
comments regardt appearance and iv *-PM* 125 f" South of
shopping meter located on the East side of De Anza B► d. appro
Silverado Ave.
Tom Robillud stated that the applicant is 11'11i* a two-week continuance*
on a 4-0 vote,the application was continued to the meeting of October 12, 1992.
_ Requesting comments for modifying a Use
2. is 'on 20- -g6 is an existing retail center located at the Northwest
Permit Condition regarding tree Preservation
corner of Stevens Creek Blvd. and Mary Avenue.
sed the
SAC.
Tom
ltobillard reviewed staff�gmments noting the four issues before
A�trees.eHe�stated that
background of the tree removals for the site and the of the restrequired aurant from adjoining residential
staff is concerned r� the lack of screening
properties. He statal staffs
recommendation is to replace the Tree with two new oak trees
City���•
meeting the same criteria as previously requiredby
i
S
TV
� *
ASAC MI14t1TES IM
Pap-2-
Kimbaty Thurston, Coate, Have Factor, Dave Mackey, and 10 FAximm owners and
arborists, representing the Oaks Center, addressed ASAC and expb&wd the background and
reasons behind the small caliber oak trees which were used for mp They stated that at
the tine of the rep 8" cafta freer were not aveable any whae in the sty. It was
sad that the caliber sin of an oak tree is not an appropriate measure of the sin of a try but
rather the canopy spread of a tree would be more appropriate. Mr CA%=wed that the crown
spread between a 5"and 5"cahber size is very m;nirns►1. He stated that a 6V bore tree has
an approximate 15 foot spread. A 48"box tree is approximately 12 feet tag,has an 8 foot spread
and an 4"diameter trunk.
Committee Member Lim ;,fated that the island, where tree No. 70 is, should be modified in order
to hold a larger tree. He felt it was fine to remove the limb on tree No. 55 and would accept the
tree removal of No. 70 with the replacement of two trees.
The arborists were in agreement that the tree is in decline and will eventually die and that there is
an opportunity now to get new healthier trees.
Committee Me,,ioer Lavios agreed with the arborist to remove the tree. She stated that the two
replacement trees should be placed where tree No. 70 is being removed and in a new island closer
to the restaurant. She stated that the new location should be as big as possible to allow the
largest tree possible.
Committee Member Weber stated he would go along with the removal of tree No. 70 but it
should be replaced with two 8" cah1w trees as previously required by City Council for
replacement of the other oak trees. He stated that the island's size and hole should be modified in
order to accept that size of tree. He also agreed with the ra- movat of the drab on tree No. 55.
Chairperson Hoxsie stated that he is very hesitant to recommend removal of the large oak tree
but it may be in the best interest for the long term goal of the center to remove the tree and
replace it with two ne a trees. He stag that he would like to have the arborists choose the
largest and best tree for the two locations. He questioned wiry smaller trews were planted and
questioned the long term tree care plan.
In response, the applicant addmitted that they should have returned to the City for approval of
the smaller trees prior to planting them. The arborists from CC&S, OAfpA- his firm has
aggressively ;rovtded the necessary tree care since they have been contracted to do so.
The general consensus of the Committee Members was that tree No. 70 may be removed and
replaced with two large specimen oak trees. One located where tree No. 70 is currently standing
and the other directly South of tree No. 70 in a new planter, to be constructed. ASAC
recommends removal of the large limb on tnw No. 55. They found the location of the
replacement tree to be acceptable. ASAC agreed that the applicant should have returned to the
city for approval of the smaller caliber tree sues of the replacement, but f mud the eplacemant
trees to be acceptable.
ASAC MENUTES September 28, 1992
Pap.3.0
-
3. App9i ion -SAC 14401 Nelson Chao - Requesting review and appmml of a precise
development plan for an of c rUstorage building located at the Northeast sector of Stevens Creek
Blvd. and Peninsula Avenue.
Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments adid noted the scope of the precise development Flan.
Frank Oldham, project architect, reviewed sty comments and answered questions of the
Committee Members.
Committee Member Lavios stated that is was acceptable to defer the landscaping until the area
had been abandoned by the slate. She stated she prefers elevations labeled 2B and that the
Spanish Sand color was acceptable.
Committee Members Weber and Lim concurred.
Committee Member Lim stated that the sip should be submitted under a separate application and
that the lightings at the front of the building may be approved by staff
Chairperson Hoxsie clarified that only three trees are to be planted at this time and the irrigation
should be installed. He stated it is acceptable to have staff approve the lighting. Lastly, he
expressed concern with the landscaping on the State right-of-way land. He stated ahat he agrees
with staff that a permanent landscaping plan should be approved at this time.
IDECISION
On a 3-1 vote, with Chairperson Hoxsie disenting, Application 14-U-91 was approved according
to the fktdings and conditions contained in the model resohition with Finding 2 deleted, Condition
9 modiS-td,and Conditions 10, 11, 12,and 13 added to read as follows:
CONDITIONS
9. The approval is based upon site plan dated August 17, 1992. Elevations labeled 2B dated
Septembe-r 9, 1992. An Kelly Moore Paint colors No. 231, Spanish Sand and No. 27
Bone, except as may be amended by the conditions enumerated herein.
10. Lighting at the front of the building shall be approved by staff prior to issuance of building
permits.
11. The sign program for the building shall be approved by ASAC prior to its installation.
12. The landscaping plan dated September 8, 1992 is not approved as part of this application
but shall be returned to ASAC as such time as the land between the driveway and Stevens
Creek Blvd. is abandoned to the property owners.
.. K
4r
ASAC MINUTES September 28, IM
Page-4
13. The three eucalyptus trees on the Eau$side of the building shall bey to 10 gallons
in size and fifigation shall be installed prior to occupanq of the The landscaping
shall be properly
On a 3-0 vote, with Committee Merry Weber abstaining, the minutes of September 14, 1992 were
approved with the following modifications. Page two (21 fifth (56) paragraph, ... economical, low
mainte;iance, and eve, including redwood or metal trellis, changes in atatedak or architectural
details. Also, ... a lighting fixture cut sit. The applicant should think about *w for feature tenants.
Sixth (6th) paragraph replace period after Iree with a comma and unlace access math assess. Seventh
(7th)panWaph, fist(1st.)sentence add, ... and with the side-Ad AW setbacks. Page three(3), eighth
(8th) paragraph add, ... for discussion purposes. Page four (4) under Committee Reports add second
(2nd)paragraph, The Commies Members discussed eliminating the use of the word "Hit Lists for code
enforcement referrals.
CQDEM=SORTS
Committee Member Weber asked about the status of the Pizza Hut window mural and the sign program
for Town Center.
Committee Member Lavios discussed the up coming joint meeting with City Count.
Committee Member Lim expressed concerns regarding unused signs which were stud being illuminated.
He also reported on the Mayors luncheon.
Chairperson Hoxsie reviewed the status of the Sign Ordinance Review Committee and expressed concern
regarding the planting of the McClellan Avenue crib wall.
Committee Member Lim asked staff:to look into ASAC receiving sound-off cards and minutes of the
Planning Commission and City Council mugs.
REPORT OF STAFF
- None
r
• ��may.
Wi
At 10:00 PAL do the nen reguhr meeft to be held on timber 12, IM 7:30 PAL,coAremee Room
A.
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
f Z—.
Thomas R. bi lend _
Planner H &Sit4eA r committee
ATTEST:
G
Dorothy tL%car auk
Alsw/mN92s
e
1
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALF ORNIA 9SO14(408)252-4505
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ARCHIT1ECI UM AND SITE APPROVAL
COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR OCTOBER 12, 1992,MEE`MG
HELD IN CONFERENCE ROOM A,CITY HALL,AT
10300 TORRE AVE14M CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014
The meeting was tailed to order at 7:32 P.M. by Chainerson Hoxsie.
F.OLL CALL
Members Present: Hoxsie,Lavios,Weber;
Committee Member Lim arrived at appi oximately 7:50 P.M.
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Thomas R.Robillard,Planner II
POSTPONEMENTS AND A133[1STMEN'I'S TO TIl<E AGEN)!DA®RIDER
3. Application ASAC 51 934.2 Batch Brothers-Applicant request continuance for two weeps due
to health reasons.
On a 3-0 vote, item 3 is continued to the meeting of October 26, 1992.
WRITTEN AND VERBAL COMhfl CATIONS
- None
INFORMAL REVIEW:
1. Application 28-ASAC-92 Frank and Rosalind Cardia - Requesting recommendations and
comments regarding appearance and screening of a storage container behind an existing shopping
center located on the East side of De Anza Blvd. approximately 125 ft. South of Silverado Ave.
Tom Robillard reviewed the staff continents noting that under the new Zoning Code Codification
rules the Director has the authority to make minor modifications to existing Use Permits. In this
case the Director will grant approval of the storage container for a one year period with the
condition that the appearance and location of the storage container be reviewed by ASAC.
Frank and Rosalind Cardia addressed staff comments stating that they would rather put the
® storage container'on the Northeast corner, which would take up one pairing stall. The video of
the site was shown.
.C a
ASA LIB EYMS Oar 12, 1992
Page-2-
Susan Adrian,adjacent residence,expressed concern with the use of a plumbing shop in the center
and the use of a storage container as extra square footage for the center. She also expressed
concern regarding the large hub container salting drectly behind her fence and a number of
smaller trash containers spread throughout the property.
Committee Member Weber asked staff to look at the floor area ratio with the outside storage shed
by the pet store. He expressed concern regarding the garbage containers not placed in enclosures.
Committee Member Lavios expressed concern with a large trash container and where it was
placed. She stated that if it is placed at the Northeast corner it will be visible for the neighbors.
Chairperson Hoxsie expressed concern with the trash containers not being placed in enclosures.
He stated that the storage building should be on the North side of the building. He stated that he
does not see a clean solution to the problems but that staff should find a way to resolve all the
tra:-,h problems behind the building.
Ms. Cardia suggested building a higher fence adjacent to the residence in order to help screen the
rear area.
Committee Member Lavios suggested placing a trellised fence in front of the container.
The Committee Members discussed looking into making the wall adjacent to the residences
higher.
Committee Membtw. Weber stated that he was apposed to any approval of the storage container.
2. Application ASAC 5-U-74 Siemens Corporation - Requesting recommendations and comments
regarding the architectural treatment of modifications to the exterior of an existing industrial
building. The site is located at the Southeast corner of Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue.
Tom Robillard stated that this case is similar to the previous and that the Director is making a
minor modification to the Use Permit with a condition that the changes be reviewed by ASAC.
Mr. Robillard reviewed the scope of the modifications.
Dick Campbell, consulting architect, reviewed the scope of the modifications and answered
questions of the Committee Members.
Committee Member Lim stated that he had no problems with the proposal.
Committee Member Lavios expressed concern with the removal of the tree and landscaping along
the South end of the property. She suggested planting vines along the wall on the South side of
the property to help break it up.
Committee Member Weber suggested placing a tree at the Southwest island adjacent to the wall.
He also reiterated Committee Member Lavios'comment for planting vines along the South wall.
ASACtAdMt3'F October 12, 1;992
Page-3-
Chairperson Home expressed concern wkh do removal of the large specimen tree which was
identified as an 191 diameter Japanese Bht .
Committee Member Lavios stated that an oboists report should be done to see if the wall can be
built around the tree.
The Committee Members dis aissed the ides dw the wall should stop and start on either side of
the tree with a chain-link fence in-between.
FORMAL.tEVIM
4. Application 30-ASAC-92 Bank of America-Meeting review and approval to install three new
AIM automatic teller machines at an exisft bank located on the South side of Stevens Creek
Blvd. approximately 200 feet West of Finch Aveiiue.
Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments soling that the condition of approval is included to
require approval from the Santa Clara County Sheriff Department prior to installation.
® Larry Sato,project architect, answered questiow of the Committee Members.
By general consensus,the Committee Membera fift the application was acceptable.
DECISIQN
On a 4-0 votes - Application 30-ASAC-92 was approved according to the findings and conditions
contained in the Model Resolution.
5. Application 29-ASAC-92 Micro Module System- Requesting review and approval to modify a
planned development sign program for an asisting officelndustrial building located at the
terminus of Ridgeview Court.
Tom Robillard reviewed the s, >ps of the project Ming that the signs are simple replacements of
existing approved signs. He noted that the freeway oriented sign, which Digital had before, was
denied by ASAC but approved by City Council with a clear direction that they wanted the
business to have freeway oriented signage.
Clare Wilde, Sign Classics, reviewed staff commests and answered questions of the Committee
Members.
Committee Member Weber stated that he will not approve a freeway oriented sign. He stated that
it does not conform with the requirement of the Sign Ordinance, that the use identified by the sign
does not require freeway oriented signage.
ASACfiWn dUTES October 12, 1992
Page-4-
Conmrittee Member Lavios mWessed concern with the future illumination of the monument sign
given that the background color is white and when illuminated tend$to be very bright.
Committee Member Lam expressed no concerns with the proposal.
Chairperson Hoxsie stated that he feels the building sign does not meet the criteria for freeway
oriented signs but would approve the application due to the direction of City Council.
DECISION
On a 3-1 vote, with Committee Member Weber descenting, Application 29-ASAC-92 was
approved according to the findings and conditions contained in the Model Resolution.
NIIIVUTES
6. On a 4-0 vote, the minutes of the regular meeting of September 28, 1192 were approved as
submitted.
COUMIT rEE REPORTS
Committee Member Lim expressed concern with the final design of the Mc Donalds Play Land
Structures. He stated that he feels that the appearance is not very good. He also asked 9#-tff to look into
the building color change at P.J. Mulligan, stating that the new green color does not look good.
Committee Member Weber asked staff to have the City Council minutes placed in the ASAC packets. He
also;asked about the progress of the Pizza Hut wall mural and the broken up car in the parking lot next to
Pizza Hut.
Tom Robillard stated that the Public Works Department is looking into cashing the landscape bond and
planting the required landscaping on the McClellan Road retaining wall.
Chairperson Hoxsie reviewed the progress of the Sign Ordinance Sub-Committee.
REPORT OF STAFF
Tom Robillard stated that Pat Jackson had officially resigned from the Committee due to health reasons.
ASAC/iu[WUTES
Page-S-
AifO �+t14 .1dT71' a� rlat. ASAC, to be held en
At 9:00 P.R . to the joint City CoaQ�i!lASAC
October 26, 1992,7:30 P.M..Confcmm R C.
PREP BY: APPROVED EY:
-L- 14dz
C erson
Thomas R. Robillard rp
Site Approval COMMi .
Planner H
ATTE�'
Dorothy Cornelius. City Clerk
m[NJ0Ivm=udW
,z
x. .
MWMAI
0 a
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALIFORNIA 95014(408)252-4505
MINUTES OF'f 1E REGULAR MEETING OF THE AR.CIUTECTURAL AND WE APP&"" /AL
COMMITTEE OF THE CYTY OF CUPERTINO FOR OCTOBER 26, 1992,MEETING
HELD IN CONFERENCE ROOM C,WY MALL, AT
10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPERTINO,CALIFORNIA 95014
The meeting was called to order at 7:32 P.M. by Chairperson Hoxsie.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Hoxsie,Lavios,Weber,Lim
All City Council Members were present for the joint meeting.
Members Absent: Alone
Staff Present: Robert Cowan,Director of Community Development,Thomas R. Robillard,Planner II,
Dorothy Cornelius, City Clerk,Chuck Kilian,City Attorney
1. A joint meeting between City Council and Architectural and Site Approval Committee to discuss
items of mutual concern. The items include the basic roll and purpose of the city government,
perceived problems with current system, what do we want Cupertino to loot: like?, examples of
applications; ASAC responsibilities mZarding architecture signs, siding and landscaping.
Please see minutes of joint City Council/ASAC meeting of October 26, 1992.
The joint meeting concluded at 9:10 P.M.
The regular ASAC meeting commenced immediately following.
FORMAL REVtEW
2. Application ASAC 51.834.2 Bateh Brothers - Requesting r,;-riew and approval to p"-,:ce
architectural barriers around an unimproved lot to prevent parking. The site is located at the
Southwest corner of Stevens Creek and Foothill Boulevards.
Albert Bateh reviewed staff comments and answered questions of the Committee Members. He
asked if he could place the bollards approximately 15 feet in from the property line in order to
allow trucks to park.
Staff responded that no parking can take place on an unimproved surface. The heights, spacing,
location, and materials of the bol!:�,rds was discussed by the Committee Members. It was decided
that the bollards should be rude of wood with a minimum size of 6" x 6", be 3 feet high and
spaced at 6 foot intervals. It was also decided that the exact location of the bollards would be
decided by staff.
e
ASACiMMMS October 26, 1992
Page-2-
DEC ON
On a 4-0 vote,application ASAC 51,834.2 was approved according to the findings and conditions
contained in the Model Resolution with Condition 10 added to read as faiiows:
condition
10. The applicant shall place 3 foot high wood bollards at 6 feet on center around the
perimeter of the unimproved portions of the applicants lot. The wood bollards shall be a
minimum.of 6"x 6" size. The precise location of the b-llards shall be approved by
staff.
3. Application 31-ASAC-92 John Ash Group- This application was withdrawn at the applicants
request.
APPROVAL OF MUYUTES
4. On a 4-0 vote the minutes of the regular meeting of October 12, 1992 were approved with
the following modifications:
4 Page two,third paragraph, second sentence,replace he with she.
• Sixth paragraph to read... Committee Member Lavios suggested placing a trellised
fence in front of the container.
Sevent''.paragraph to state... The Committee Members discussed looking into
making the wall adjacent to the residences higher.
Page three, second paragraph to read... Committee Members Lavios stated that an
arborists report should be done to see if the wall can be built around the tree.
Third paragraph should read... The Committee Members discussed the idea that
the wall should stop and start on either side of the tree with a chain-link fence in-
between.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
The Committee Members asked staff to look into the Mc Donald's Playland, the Pizza Hut wall
mural, the colors for PJ Mulligans, the signs at Ross Dress for Less, and new landscaping that was
planted at the Community Church on Foothill Blvd. and Cristo Rey Drive.
REPORT OF STAFF
None
ASACUINtMS Odobw 26L 102
Page-3-
A®JOiJRtylihi�'
At 9:45 p.ra. to the next regular meeting of ASAC to be held on November 9, 1992, 7:30 p.m.,in
Conference Room A.
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
'Thomas . Robillard Robqt
Planner 11 Ar- Site Approval Committee
ATTEST:
® 1
orothy Cornelius
City Clerk
MIN 1026
r
CITY OF CUF'll '$ No
10300 TOMME AVENUE,CS1I?ERT0,CALAKMNIA 9SO14(408)232- 5
IMMUTES OF TM REGULAR b§MTM OF THE ARCMECTMAL AND SM APPROVAL
COMME (W Th%MY OF CUPERTWO FOR NOVOMM 9, 1M MIEB G
EWD IN CONFERE14CE ROM C,MY EIAIA AT
103M TORRE AVENE)E,CMERTM,CALIFOR-MA, 9S014
AWOUh81e1>tWENT
Adjourned for lack of qwffuw to the next regular> ft&g of ASA,,%to be held on Ncwenber 23,
1992, 7:30 p.m.,in Ckmfimmw Room A.
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
e
homas R. Robillard 11 d` o !e,
Planner and Site Approval Committee
ATTEST:
Dorothy
City Clerk
MNI 1992
9 ^+: .7 ham"_ j a}' 4,. Y,Ff, y if✓ ai
. r
OF W
CITY OF CUFZRTINO
AVENUE,C EO,C OI 95014( 252-4
50
10300'TORRE APPROVALIE
OF THE-EM" �•E`MG OF THE CCU
11 ,�G�
Tli+lO POR. Now"
CO1 owns OF THE CITY OF CUI Ot R A,CTTy AT
HEDINC® Q'CIF®R� 45014
10300 TORRE A'�
The meeting was culled to or&r at 4:04 PIL by
Imo•
RO___A
Mem1r preseaHoxsie,Lavin,Wes,Lem
Members Absent: bone
Staff Present: Thomas
I•Robillatd'planner U
ER
POS'i'IP0 1tii11;*a"a�ptyLD QSTlU1Eh aS TO Tffi;A44_ �_.ORD
-None
N
CAI.C CATIONS
-None
CONSENT t_'A""_ARftpgsf
mg review and approvalfor a growd SIV locawd at the
1. Aveffum
p lication 34-ASAC-92����°-�-��
Northeast darner of Tar►tau and ge
2 Cancellation of the w'Wae meeting ofDecengm28'1992
On a 4-0 vote,the Cwk%M Calendar wasWwve&
IrORTiRAL._ �, and mmments on a proposed pig Ouctim in the
►ication 10-U-92 W_ el and
Blvd.
3' Sure�g lot between the Sears building
�Ong ASAC's ideas and ca��on the prono��
Tom Robillard reviewed stab rO11 rnents noting that staff Planning ®n at tonight's (Navembe
parking structure. Those comments will be forwarded
to the 1992)meeting the pedestrian
lain the login and a a&ed locatio°e°f the��• He dish
Sohn Endicott,Westfield Inc-,exp side not n
linkages and bridges. He explained that the easterly
He feels that it is a dot to the vrs'bility of
Committee Member Lim stated that he does not like the sue• Ceeek Blvd is not good fat the city or for
Sears. He •,that the aesthetic appearanceredesigning the
ing MIMM to
Bouts He suggested t ��be
the diction t�ce city is going towards
for subterranean or covered with other businesses.
ASAC SPECIAL rd=TJNO.'; MIND I:S Novaaber 23,4992
Pap 2-
Member Lavios concern with the appearance and the lack of any intelests. She
stated that she would like to see more ardftctmal inter designed into the state and the the walkway
should be visible and inviting,but vat bright or garish.
N=W]Brunet,resident, expressed concern with the a mp and futon signs on the sue,eVecift for the
ems.
Mr.Endicott explained the sign proposals. He stated that there would be a madmboard at tin man entgam near
McDonalds and a readaboard sign on the South elevation of the panting structure.
Committee Member Weber stated that if this structure is a copy r :isting psntittg guagm it will no be a
good looking structure. He stated that he would like to see sub' parking. He suggesteil instead c°having
the pedestrian linkage jog around the building, the walkway a.. ,be made through the parsing strucaue into
Sears. Lastly,he stated that he would recommend denial;,-'the project.
Chairperson Hoxsie stated that he felt the location of the structure is not the best. However, taking all things into
consideration, the city must make the best out of a poor situation. He stated that more architectural interests
should be built into the structure.
Commits Member Lim so-gested that there must be a better solution to the parking structure. He feels the city is
rup,Lang too fast into the situation,that it would not look goad and that it will last a very long time. He sad more
serious consideration should be made into alhmnatives,
4. 4ualicaiion 81,954.5 Cih of Cuupertmo. Adding Chag_tea : 15, Xeriscape jMftyging of the Cupertino
haunicigal Cade -Requesting review and comments on the prop Xeuiscape Ordinance.
Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments nosing why the City needed to adopt a Xenscape Ordinance. He
outlined the changes proposed from the Xenscape Guidelim to the Xenscape Ordinance and discussail the
different enforcement possibilities.
Committee Member Weber made the following corrections to the Ordinance:
1. Section 4- should exempt single-family hLms.
2. Section 7.2 larger aree wells should be required for oak trees.
3. Se.�ion 10,41h paragraph to read,the efftc lent opci ation of irrigation equipment maybe subject to
city inspection. . .
All Committee Members agreed with Committee Member W&-n—b suggestions
Chairperson Hoxsie stated that Section 7.10 is inconsistent with Number 3 of the compliance checklist. Section
7.10 states that the minimum dimension of any turf area should be 15 feet. Number I of the compliance checklist
states that the minimum turf area should be h feet. He also stated the City should at least follow th "spirit"of the
ordinance.
5. Application 2-U-81 (Modifiedi Scott Design Associates -Requesting early review of a use permit modification to
add a second story Adition, increase the floor area ratio and coverage, and reduce the ground floor rear yard
setbacks. The house is located at 22573 Woodridge Court.
Tom Robillard reviewed staff comments nosing the scope of the projects:;relationship to the ltl Ordinance.
® Scott Cunniu,g,`am also reviewed the scope of the project and aasweered questions of the Committee Members.
Committee Member Lavuos questioned the appearance of the mass of the patio enclosure as it is viewed from the
adjoining,esidential neighbors.
RPM-
►SAC SPECUL ti+d=TING MI OJM Nevada 23,1g92
Pap-3-
Mt Cunningham explained that Me POO WU made of Skims wtdch tcduces do Wmance of -
f Muse Member LaWas stall that she would Mw to ads sure that the nei&=to the rear knew about ft
hanges-
Ali the Committee Members Weed that the plan shouts be signed off by all staining neighbom
ComnAn—Member Weber fdt tho the lot and tttel4 foot setback are to small,and the Saar area ratio is too high.
He suggested eliminating the green house.
Chairperson Hoxsie also vqmsed concern ceding the setlmick and the floor area ratio.
6. A mhandon 11-U-92 Bradw-lnt'i (OtiDr% - Ong early review of a use permit to demolish an existing
restaurant and construct a new 4,693 square foot restaurant, low on the South side of Stevens Creek Blvd.
approximately 380 AM West of Blaney Avenue.
On a 4-0 vote,item Six(6)was conSnued to the re, w meeting at 7:30 PAL
7. Attatication 33-ASAC-92 Arrow n-Reque9bg a tigtt exception Yor a graurtd sign located on North D Anaa
Blvd.approximately 3-A fecs South of Homestead Road.
Tom Robillard reviewed staff comments noting that,if'the center was considered as a whole shopping center,there
are already two existing signs. However,if the ceaw was split into its existing separate parcels,then the proposed
sign will be an off-site sign.
I D. Vanderlaan,representing the owner,and Lori fA' ham,Arrow Sign,reviewed staff comments and answered
questions of the Committee Members,
Committee Member Lim suggested replacing the Payless sign with an upgraded sign including Payless,REl and
Michael's. He stated he has heard that Michaels would like a monument sign as well. He suggested staff check
with the fire department regarding any sedock restrictions for the sign and the water pump. Lastly,he stated that
De Anna Blvd.is not the best place for a sign due to visibility and the speed of cars.
Committee Member Lavios stated that a makes more sense to view the center as a whole rather than two separate
parcels. She suggested redoing one of the signs so that there is no more than two signs.
Committee Member Weber stated that the center already has three signs including Carl's Jr. He stated that the
sign, is proposed, is too high and that an 8 font sign would be more acceptable. lastly, he stated that since
ivfi%;hael's will also want a ground sign,they should be integrated together.
It was decided that the applicant would prefer that this item be continued so that they can propose an alternate
plan.
Decision
On a 4-0 vote,application 33-ASAC-92 was continued to the meeting of December 14, 1992.
t 'h -
��
ASACMMaALPAZMGMMVM
page 4-
Alld®URNMRl
At 6:15 p nL to the ngda maeft November 23,lMst7-30PMCorfae=Room&
P1tEP oiY: APPROVED BY-
j 4F/
OMMM lt.
Planner I1 --PVK and M A
pA Committee
ATTEST:
Dorothy ConwlKm City Calear1c
Mini 123s
max, xF :s v
z '
f
a%
9 -
CITY OF CUPERTINO
m00 Tom AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALMOPUNIA 95014(409)252-4505
MINUTES®F THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ARCI31TECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL.
COADUT TEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR NOVEMI3ER 23, 1992,MEETING
HELD IN COWERENCE ROOM A,CITY HALIy AT
10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALIFOILY►11A 95014
The meeting was called Z.s order at 7.40 P.M.by Chairperson Hotnde.
Rt�CALL
Member Present: Hoxse,l.avios,Weber,Lien
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Tbomw R.Robillard,Planner 11
t rrtirr M trtrn FROM THE SPECIAL MR MG QF 1VOi►ERdBER 23.1292
2"MEMAL RENEW
6. Application I1-U-92 Brinker LnA Chili's - Requesting cagily review of use permit to demolish an existing
res inm and construct a new 5,693 square foot restaurant, located on the South side of Stevens Creek Blvd.
approximately 390 feet West of Blaney Avenue.
Torn Robi lard reviewed the staff comments noting the scope of the project.
Kim Woodard,Brinker Intl.,reviewed staff comments and answered questions Lfithe Committee Members.
Committee Member Lim stated that he felt the fame looks odd;especially because it is not connected with the
main building. He stated that it tends to look like a HdVwaod set. He suggested connecting the facade with a
trellis work or some other similar structure to the,.am building and add more vegetation.
Committee Member Lavios exprsecd concern of the missed opportunity,for the City, to get people and bring a
liveliness out to the street with the building being set so far back and with no proposals for outside seating. She
stated that more vegetation should be added to liven up the front.
The Committee Members discussed signs on the fasmdc and on the building. They determined that two signs on
the facade and one sign on the building would be acceptable.
Committee Member Weber felt that the faces will be interesting.
Chairperson Hoxsie stag that he fell that the facade will not work for the site and that the building is set too far
back.
REGULAR ITEMS;
INFORMAL.REVIEW
1. Application ASAC I-U-90 Terry_Brawn-Requesting informal review of colors, materials, and landscaping for a
single family home located at 10342 Scenic Blvd.
Tom Robiliard reviewed the staff comments noting that the scope of ASAC review is for the color of thee materials
and landscaping.
ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE MINUTES 3 of 3
1992 & 1993
-2-
Terry the tt� ann8 Sntt�tere atd and
taft� ,
Tom
Rdeam reviewed tare paumwhich were btonplit up izt of
k�er fit�►'�
Mr- ®lack, dom�►
presented pge�hs of�alto and his con�r+s.
MemW Weber had no piablerns withdWnatingthe drWcmy at am top and stated do the decks
show not be built arithin tlic drip line of the tree.
not have. to address the landscaprng•
Committee Member LOVIDS Sb led that she doesdwk within the drip line would be accOWAe as long as an
tt tam SU Stated��d�a
ftprdmg the line was
artrig�lt stating that MOOCOOn
review and�di to modify a precise d,, elopment plan
Rid opposite g ,;�++ASAC 7 U-87 Temt_Brawn - Mira vista Road.
for tl�moping of a retaining wall on McClellan
Hoxsie excused bitn�self from voting on this application dare to his living across the street from the
wall" heed to ozrme 0 a
Committee Member Weber stated drat Plants will rro8 grow itt the> �and t and water
�callyr along the wall to help and to fertiiiz+e
�1 He st p ng this application in one yam.
mare aftm He suggested
Committee Members Lavtos,lam and Weber,agreed.
,ft Committee dish to approve the application or oontlrare it inao"*MW the Plants have grown
Deci�oa
On a 2-1 vote, with Coinmi
Member Weber d
' with F?inding l modaded and
a todre Ftndmp editions dontamed in Conditions
2,and 3 added to'ad as
Findin
That the proposed landscaping plan will paver the wallCier�dy an3 will use low water.
1.
Conditions
a second opinion from a registered 1a�s�architect,approved by
1 The applicant shall obtain, aping scheme to meet the intent-
staff,to determine if the pmposed landscaping is the best landsc
2. The applicationin one Year,
shall be reviewed
3. Strings shall be placed verticaUY along the wall to help the vines grow. The applicant shall
fiertilize and water the plants f g*"O'•
hffROVA OF NdlNf]'fES
on a 1-0 vote,the minutes of the regular Meetingof October 26, 1992 wee approved as srehmitted.
is r consensus,the Minutes of November 9,1992 were found to be aoceptable-
(t
i •{1
• o
•. :(' t �A Ft( ''%i'-0l L'S"'1'.. .-Usldt)Yi tie' i.:�M'"r:'d
♦ll't 13 f[+^., .:,�1{f,.:t' :1� :...i:a :w`:'rf Sf. )l.t',� s: -.+�1'/t(J.t,.0 '''f'- _ _
.r
�. •!! f I' 1 G"1' a:� 7:. IIFa�CI_ '(/- i"- 1;?{ 1' 5:11
J1
.1 .•j� [. t- i[I if 'UF.'
it
S C •
tl .
- °ya : -
.r a
-
u±r
M wlrt�
103-00'fORM AVENW CUPERTWO,CAWOHMA 95014(408)252-4505
AMDWED MVWIW OF THE REGULAR 11r1EET NO OF THE MCH[TECTURAL
Ai+1O SITE
MPROVAL COARAWM OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR DEMgM 14, 1992,
MWWO HUM IN CONMENCE ROOM A.CITY HAU AT
IMW TORRE AVENUk C[hERT'INO.CAL1FORNU 95014
The meeting was COW to ordar at 7:30 P.M.by Chdrpmon ate.
ROLL CALL
Member Present: Home,Lavim Weber,Lint anived at 7:35
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Thomas IL Planner It
POSTPONEMENTS AND rO THE AGLNDA ORDER
-None
WRnrTEN AND 3%BRAL e9M2909-CA- —l"N
-None
FORMAL REVItEW
I. Al2lication 1AMON (modifiedi Bank of AMM - Requesting Vie, and approval to moft a
Planned d0v`010111110ot sign program to allow two monk signs at an mshng bank building located on
the South side of Stevens Crack Boulevard approAmately 200 fed West of Irm ch Avenue
Tom Robillard reviewed&a staff comments noting the scope of the project and recommended denial.
George Helleric h. Mina-tree Signs incorporated, reviewed the staff comments and answered questions of
the Committee Myers.
Committee Member Tani stated that he had no problem with the main ant sign as long as an
address was Placed on it. He stated he felt the drive-up telter directional sign was not needed,especially in
the Proposed location as the driveway in that location was very narrow and hard to use.
Committee Member Lavios agreed with Committee Member Lim that the smaller dirational sign was not
needed and that the new proposed sign looks better than the existing sign.
Committee Member Weber and Chairperson Home felt thee:approving the monument signs would canes
an over proliferation of signs at the site.
DECISION
On a 3-1 vote, with Committee Member Lim descantio& application I-ASAC-90 (modified)was denied
according to the findings contained in the Model Resolution.
f l
I'&WUM 6•ii7AJ3'b7
bw now for denial mu betty the *WWOW
s ch*wVftft"dftWouuddpwoWbr mmtb=WLUwoumnwmfttmamwdaloyatbalft
in Ehe Qty.
A?MO-X L QF men=
2.and 3. On a 4-0 V0% the minutes of the regular meedu of Nuvember 23, 1992 ad Ehe mhow d the
Spedal Mceft of November 23,1992 were appwved as SdRDittc
COMB )
Committee Member lane ash staff to check the Symantec sib fbr conibrmance with dtY appravN.
Committee Member Weber asl£ed to look into the Town Cash signs.
REPORT OF STAR
Staff reported on the City Cumicil decisions regarding the parking sbuctnre for Westfield Inc., the P109=of t:
xeriseape Ordinance and dud City QwnW had graved the kndscgmfor the McClellan Road=Wning wall.
ANPURWUNT
At 8:15 P.M.to the neat FROM mpg to be held On JaMINY 11, 1"2,7:30 P.M.Ca fhem Rom A.
BY: APPROVED BY:
Thomas R.Robillaad � -
Planner Il wd Site Approval ComMMC
ATTEST;,,
Dorothy Co
City Clerk
��m�nsztsn
CITY OF C'Vpzx—TINO, .;'I
APPROVAL
MMUM VT 3O REGMAR W 0,OF ARCHUSCrURAL
COW&Tr E OF vM CTTY jIF CUpMTW0 FOR JANUARY 11, 1 ,hMMG
HEW a4 CONFEWNCE ROOM A.CITY HAU-,,AT
lOM TO E;AVENt1E CUPERTINO C O 95014
The meding was called to order at 7.37 P.K by
R®f.Y.CALL
Member Prey Haulai,Lavaca►Weber
Members Absent: Lima
Staff Present: Throw R.Robillard,Planar 11
gAg� NTS A,NIf Alal�T�i,`r"°e Tn�a[�.t��►Afltilll�
-NOW
VE]RUM f�M1VIL>SIN[t^AATdON�
-Now
AIF®WAL RED
1. AWli on 1 AAM Westfield Inc -Rig review and commmem on ft atichitectumd appearazwe of a
new parking saucum located at Vallee Fashion Patk a¢paent to Sears and Stevens Creek Bawls vard.
Tom Robillasd reari,e vd staff comml meting that staff preffe;s the ongmal design c=CW of the paIWg
ire. �:outlined the commits as state in the staff repaart.
Jim Ellar.rqMwHtWWesf M I=,mbioduc ed the project and the praM architect.
Terry Ferrera,psojea ambitead,tel the scope and mdftcWM derails of Wesffid s puftned design and
9 -so"ted vasm of the original desiga concept
Committee Member Lavios stated that she prefferr+ed the os pnd design pr l- She expressed concern with
the design of the oovemd v-W]may stating that it did not p well with the W&ftcWd style of the budding-
She reaw vA sWS Comments stating comems with the colored flood lights and the possible
to the building. She stated she prefers the amount of ambitec kmIl dowiling as shown on the original design
concept and if a neon ban was placed on the building it should be subtle and used only to big 'igbt the
architecdual details. She stated that she pn feas vines on the fmat trellis weak lather than shrubs.
Committee Member Weber stated that he prefers the original design concept as well,but stated that the Meow
leading to the matt should be an integral awbita*val feaEme of the building rather than an attached canopy
The other Committee Members agreed.
Chairperson Hmm stated he also preffets the original design concept and agreed with the oammefitS,hem the
other Committee Members.
Committee Member Lawos Mated that this is an opportunity to retura vivaciousness to an otherwise doll
shopping center and that it should be taken advantage Of.
ASACbMOYM
lnaitdin$�18s txx tt►be e3 no
e stated that the vivadousnessof do bAWWg should be aftemed in a tewpmy or
seasonal basis tether t permanent of thctas go acid out o?PsEy .
2. Ae"Mdm 36A 6 ( Nod 1 VS review and coxnamb far
alchitactasat to=eidsting offia builtling. IU toodfficakm Include mbft a toond Story
balcony on the Noth won. The site is located at the SouftM Corner®d Stc Cicalaftfivmdawl
Torre Avenue.
Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments mpg that the 100 sq. I =closure does men the Gw al flan
and Zoning
Gail Boettcher,Design Advauiage,and C. Donald Allen,Cupertino National Bank,mviewed the scow of the
project and the need to eliminate the ballcoay.
Committee Member Weber stated that the building may look odd with only on balcony,and stated that the
balcony is a needed architectund fi mum of the building to provide rdid
Commmme Amber lavios stated that she will support the proposal because tiro building was desigasd poorly
in the first place and that reMOT21 ofthe baksM will not maloe a diffimm in its
Committee Member Hanie stated that he would support the proposal agreeing with Committee Member
lavios.
E—OHNAI.RRVIE®Il
3. Application 35-ASAC-42 Sonlite Sim& Inc - Ytequ�ing review and approval to math fy a planned
development sign program to allow tm n m window signs for a siagte tenant in an a dstmg shopping center.
The site is loud at the Soudn p-corner of De Am Boulevard and Fkmnstmd Road.
Tom Robillard reviewed the staff comments noting that N--ff is recommendmig denial for two reasons: ij that
the Sign Ordinance Committee has developed criteria,for�aeon window no for commercial centers and this
proposal does not mat those miteria;2' Three neon window signs in such a small)store faont would muse a
over proliferation of signs at the Center since other tenants in the Center would be allowed the am number of
signs to be egdtability.
Dan and Karen Nitta wvwwW the staff comments and stated that there an mating micutiLumm to this
particular type of business in that the nay of the business, Motto photo, does M dearly indicate that the
services provided at the site also include a poitm audio,passport photos,dnd one hour;film processing. The
applicant also indicated that the store front was 2S fed wide rsether than 20 feet as staff had bee$ told
previously.
Mr. Robillard then explatnad that this would deange leis reeommaadation slightly and based on the proposed
criteria for the new sign ordinance would allow one 4 sq.ft.aeon sign for the shop.
Committee Member Lavws stated that one neon sign for the store would be acceptable.
Committee Member Weber stated that be would not support any signs except for maybe one neon sign.
Chairperson HOKSic stated that he would support an neon sign of 4 sq.ft.with an additional 4 sq.ft.of vinyl or
® other type of lettering on the window.
The Committee Members discussed the appropriate size of permanent window signs for the shop. it was
decided that a 4 sq. & neon window sign in the lotion of the one4mur film prop%ft sigh would be
r ,FT
y .
Wgb S nd 4 41 is am WOM be �oo
On a 3-0vw,OPPlimfin 33-I1SAM wn 4PProwd Occufft tO 00 llndl4Pis the
Model Resolution with Haft I MOMW and Condidw 10 added to Ual SS gawr
1' corium�. are whit Tick 17 of the d Code as
kafo
10. The approval is for ODD(1)nt sip of 4 square fett located wheys ft oow4Ww film PUCUW hmald. An additional 4 mpmne feet of wWOw OP00�80 wider than 30 ink wig is
with 6 inch high letters maybe placed in the same window paneand below the approved sign,
4. Iication 36•A�AC-92 Iialoer and 13�viQ[� .RequesOM WA w and
landscape plait and for fbr Mm t0 a use permit for archit
10cmd at the Southwest corm of DeAm Boulevard and ftnestead Rod. 7`he so ig
Tom on ofard explained.that the moons to the lands pbm ng y AW aad the
addition of w for lam/ w01 be granted as a to the Use pennk with
with the Ile also stated that the t pit is n with the Xai$cVe 0-9-exertion that the tmfwm ems 2P/.of the total l area. uldoMm
Homestead Square, reviewed staff? and
Members, q of the
COlumillee Memba weber stated that b2th k
Committee Membet Lawos steed the erne supp"L
Chairperson)~loxde stated that he hid nD concerns with the wig but had some terns rdth the amouut
Of the turf area being proposed,
It was discussed among the Committee Membazs the WWiatgnm of the amount of t4: area.
On a 3-0 vote aPplication 3&ASAC-92 was approved accordWS to thefmdiopand boas COMBnod
in
the
Model Resolution with Finding I modified,Condition 9 mmodified,and Condition 10 added to read as Wovs+s:
Fines
1 ape Gtiuidelirm as condWon herci Proposed Aanuqg and kaptica plan are in substandal°onformance with the CM o
ndi
® 9. The approval is based upon the planting plan dam March 20, 1992 and irr*dm plaza dated Decongm
10, 1992 except as may be amend by the oandit=WnnoaWd herein.
at�S aid i`n'
APPRCIVAL QF ls �
5. b8i m=offt regular a g CfDMmzft 14,lye we appuwd with ft
Cbmmittor McMhW LSVWS SWW dB dws M reoll staft the second amum atpantSM&S of IMM_l W d
fcgUWM that it bn 19MOW& Also t3te fiW PuBgrgh an pp 2 to Vie: Cbmmftw
her for dmW was be==tie buUng mid dgm WMW be big*vY Ltd ftpund alga
would be am than what would now be allowed at any other site in do may,
CXDMMi'd'l�RI�QRTS
Commida umber Wd w asimd staffto took uga the nm wmdow signs at the Suer Craven Bogs Stom.
Chafrpe M Kmade ashd Offto send the mmuto in ft FMIMI ofthe Sign OrMnarn Committee to ASAC.
REPORT C)F STAIW
Staff stated that the second stony addition an Wood mop Court was q prowd by City C.a and with a 47%floor area
ratio.
ADICIUPIeR'
At 9:35 p.m.to the newt regular me*29 to be held on lannaay 25,M,7:30 p m.,Cie Room A.
® PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY,
I` <VU
---�
Thomas R. 'Robert ei Planner Et Arch. Site A�:vt.Committee
ATTEST.
1 �1
4e� 000
MY Corns"
City Clerk
�:asacse�,iugt
pAn� r��103�pM'&`�3 THE�ig�� .1�'p y�'t�3P�.�y�C PERTI M� ..,, �w. �,' I4L4, ......... .'APPROVAL
s NMHt Ayi.U,rf3U6pd�['q �}�Y$�i'ig ls4'�/67�1 akYti���ryl��A`�,`G�d�d+FpY�i�S�y'i/��iq} 8i KTMAL 'fly 9v
cVh�[Si�Jbi iL^m o Tim c&i�d^�6��i$c�LiSiii668� o FoR-iA Y 2s, 1993, ]F o
DEED IN COMMENCE ROOM A,CITY EWXw AT
10300 TOIL AVE CUPgRTIRtO,CALEOM9A 95014
The meeting was ealfrd to orda at 7:33 F.K by
RQX CALL
Member Present: Haxsic, Weber,Tunis,FwHch
Members Absent: Line
Staff Present: '*leorms R Robillard„Planner it
F®S1'PONEN,4FN°!'SAMP AID►JUSSTid/E TO TOR r��A OR�DFIIt
-None
MSMPt AtsID RBAL COMM�CA710N3
-None
9LECT QN OF OFFICERS-
Committee Member Harris pointed out that all ASAC members need to be prjemt for an Election of Officers.
On a 4-0 vote,item I was continued until all ASAC members are present.
FORMAL REVIEW:
2. Applicatime ASAC 51908.2(Ameade0 Bilk Mire and Assoc, - g review and approval to modify
planned development sign,proparn for an casting regional shWAS mail, looted on the West side of Wolfe
Rd.bawcon Stevens Crook Blvd.and I-290.
Torre JRobillard renewed staff emmeets noting did staf h main object w to the neon sign is that it is
redundant,being close to the main wall sign facing Wolfe Rd. He noted that the main wall sign has 4 R. lush
letters facing Wolfe Rd. The neon sign can also be seen fiam the soudoty direction of Wolfe Road.
Wendy Norgaard and Wade McClure rep=Qmg Ross Dress for Less, explai od that the intent of the now
sign is that it be seen from the parking lot to direct people to Ross.
Committee Member Harris asked about a similar sign on the opposite side of Ross which can also be seen frrnn
Wolfe Road.
Mr.Robillard explained that he would look into that sign to verify whether or not it had been approved.
Committee Member Weber stated that he felt that the now sign caused too many signs in one location. He
stated the neon sign could be better used m a locations directed towards the parking lot rather than Wolfe Rd.
Committee Member Harris agreed with staff comments and felt that the sign was i duplication of signs alroady
in that location.
A Jar Z5, 1993
Page-2-
finftft Member Frolich sty be filt that the am sign was to man compared to v"s going ou M the
is not ftmcfwc.and is useful to pedcsWans and pea&is ft pddfe kc
ChaffPcMan Hoxde agreed with waff comments that ft sign is rednftt
D-MS10N
On a 3-1 vote with Committee Member Frolirh ion ASAC 31,908.2 was denied according
to the findings and moons dined in the Model Resoludom
APPROVAL OF MINiJTF.S
On a 2-0 vote, with Committee Members Harris and Frolich abstaining, the minutes of the regular meetiog of
January 11, 1993 were approved as submitted.
CQNdRRITTEE RE O '!'S
Committee Members Harris and Frolich asked questions of staff and the CommWee regarding ASAC and ASAC
procedures. The Comm tt c discussed too City Council's disces ion of eliminating ASAC. The Connufte asked
staff to provide a copy of the minutes of the City Council meeting when they discussed eliminating ASAC.
Chairpersion Hoxsie and C.ommitbw Member Weber expressed can that ASAC°s 'on for Westfield
Inc.parking garage was misreprese ad to the Planning Cmmissiom and City Council. They wanted it made elm
that their reconmundation was for the original desk concept and not the revised dsmvmM of the oq&W deMp
concept as prod by Plannut Director Cowan.
Committee Member Weber asked to see the minutes of the January+ 11, 1993 Planning Commission nwaft and the
Jamary 19. 1993 City CO=W meeting when this issue was discussed.
REPORT OF STAFF
-None
AR OURINId M
At 8:40 P.M.to due next regular meeting to be held on February 8, 1993,7:30 P.M.,Conference Room A.
PRE RED BY: APPROVED BY.
Thomas R.R illar'd Rob person Planner R Site Aprvl. Comte
ATTES i
D
City Clerk ASAM=203
U3 s"
t
CITY OF CUBERTI p
10300 TORRE AVEIM CUl ERE N0.CALIFORNIA 95014(408)252-4505
NMglUTlES OF THE REGULAR NIEE'TING OF THE ARC.EIniFURAL AND STYE
APPROVAL COACWTTEE OF THE CTTY OF CUPERTINO
FOR FEBRUARY 8, 1993,METING
HELD IN COIe1FEIMCE ROOM A,CITY HALL,AT
10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUFERTIINO,CALIFORNIA 95014
The meeting,was called to order at 7:30 P.M.by Chabperson Koxsie.
DOII.14 CALL
Membay Present: Hoxne, Weber,Harris,Frohch
Members Absent: Lira
Staff Prneat: Thomas R Robillard,Planner 11
WSTPDPtEMEN`l'S AND ADJ LT-V M TA Tn A% A®inDER
•None
VVDMM MM.*4%1tBAL COMMUMCATIONS
Patsy Lueieowski expressed concern to ASAC regarding um in pang lots of several shopping off.
She stated that the shopping centers were pruning their um so lwjv as to keep them as small as bushes. She
asked if:he City could do anythi% Mr. Robillard explained that as long as the trees were kept in goal
order that there was nothing the City could do. He stated that the reason the trees were trunmed so small
was probably to maximize die�paddng lot lighting for the safety of thcir customers. He stated that he would
be glad to provide Ms. L iewski with the names and addresses of the property owners of the shopping
centers and she could write them regarding her concerns.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Agglicagion 26 ASAC•92 (modifie% James Sievers • Requesting review and approval for a planned
development sign program for an existing restaurant located tit the Southwest corner of De Anza Blvd.
and Alves Drive.
On a 4-0 vote,the item was continued to the end of the meeting due to the ap hc&.A not being present.
AEPkOVAL OF AMTFS
2. On a 4-0 vote, the minute ,of the regular meeting;of January 25, 1993 we.,--approved as amended.
Committee Members Frolich and)Harris pointed cmt several typographical errors.
Cmmuiftee Member Frolich pointed out that item 2,paragraph 2, last sentence should read... The neon
sign can also be seen from the southerly direction of Wolfe. Rd. Paragraph 4 should read... Committee
Member Harris asked about a similar sign on the opposite side of Ross which can also be seen from
Wolfe Rd.
"au
in I WON
AUCAUNUIS
FComnium Member djM i
rAW
MMUEMURAM
WP'Jw adwd siadfft StdOw_ with tic Pim lint ply nand.
B`Vow4 an the . stating that ASAC wdl start mvig%*
at the zadt,me9ftW 90 vW=SCd coOCern rcPnft the Paw awning on De Ana
BEFORE'OF
Mr. Robillard stated that do Ras Dms For Lem sign denial was appealed and will be heard at the
February 15, 1993 City Council
Committee Mlembers Fwhch and Ham stied that d wy would attend the meeting and commCM on ASAC's
position.
On a 4-0 vote,hm 1 was c094inaied to to nweftof February 22, 1993.
ADdOUMMM
At 8:10 PA-1.to am=a regdlat mecting to be hdd on February 22, 1993,7:30 P.M.,Co&reace Rom A.
PREP BY. APPROVED RYY:
owns R. bill W
Planaar ll and Site Aprvt.Counnimm
A
Dorothy
City Cleric
r
a low TMEA�IBB.
hlIEltP 31w,R MRJU MEWG R A f`RNAL AM UM MMVAL
OF TM C1`I'f OIL CLvmnm FM kg" Ey=IM MWMG CAIjFOR CIA M14
HELD IN CU ICR ROOM AT 1 A
VW
The movtiag was adled to onkc;-C: 7:33 P.M.by ChRhPWW HWMIC-
KQIL
Weber.LAM FwliC a
Members Absent Harris
Staff Prscnt: Thom R.Roblihm',Planner 11
PS�STI<':Dl�'EM11N'�AND Ad�*es > '1°D T1#E A A OR
•None
::'P..�a a HAND VRIt113AI.�11CATIQNS
-Now
CONSENT 6;.',�NAAH
1. ;i, nn 2f- SAG-9Z {�,.�a �fines 5iavRcWxsftgnor and qVwW fia a glmmd dfvdQPw9Ut sign
program fa an cxWjng reMlantlocated at the Sow ciorner dDe Am Blvd.and AWO Drive.
0
On a 4.0
M vote,the item was vemoved foam the Consent Cat -
Chakyerson Roxde asked to see samples of the ldttering.
Committee Member Weber asked to see the address numbaas placed an tb l 1111011UMOnt sign
jam Sievers.applicant,stated that he was om=nW tbaL if the add=is plate an the sign it may cleteact£tntn the
aesthetics of the sign.
Mr.Robillard stated that the address numbers were going to be plae W an the bruit ng as required by ASAC 1wAou*•
DctgWa vats.Apiplis tion 2ti-A5AC-92 was app3oved to the findings and motions contained in the Model
Resolution with Condition 10 added to read as follows:
Condition lo: Prior to installation of the sign staff along with the applicwv will More adAno AdreSs numbers on the
gmund sign.
FORA9A1.IEtEVIEW
2. Apgification $1,_.�__004,154 Heritage Tree Nomination: RWatmgappraval to dmguate a Coast Live Oak tree as a
heritage tree in acoorda=with,Ordinance No. 1373. The tree is located at 22344 RWws*Drive.
D i i n- findings and conditions contained in the Madel
On a"vote, Application 81,W4.134 was approved a000rdirsg to the
Resolution.
PS
ASAOMOMM
3. WVkW W d WWVjd of the QVItine, sip Oranance
revision.
Mora Rob>'llard reviewed do h sad scope Gfravkwefft Sign Ovdiamme Review Committem
Cam Member Sletrer sed do be fact the Sip Otiluma was tivivards badness and dial he was mit happy
with the
Can Hoxsie a+eviMW the goats and objectim of the Sign Osdinam Review Committee and a&4mmd tin items
which he felt were and were no addressed by the Committee. He asked if staff would have drawl'ugs and carts ready for
the Sip Onfinance before it MA ASAC. Mt RoUbid stated that he would.
Chairs Hoxsie suggested that m the special signs sec= that the square botage and heights of the various types of
signs be,consistent. In Section 17.24.080,he felt the S,GD 4 fr.si c was too small Chairpaisan Hgxde stated that the
design criteria in 17.24.230 did not go for enough to design criteria. He.gated in S 17.52.090,that it
should be made dear tit a person guilty of an . c wld be fined for every day of the fiactisn as in vlolaf m of a
code.
The Commies agrd that the definition of illegal signs should be added back in. 7UCommitteediendiscassedhowto
format,' document for presenMion to the Ong Commission and City Council while MeM the comments from
ASAC and the Sign Review Commme
A1.ROVA&OF MBiEM
4. On a 3-0 vote,with Committee Member Lim abodaing,the nri from the regular meeting of wary 8, 1993 were
approved as amended as fallow&:
Prior to atournment of the meeting:On a 4-0 vote,Item 1 was to the meeting of Fdnuary 22,1993.
COZi�HKEPM
Tom Robillard reviewed the action of the City Council regardmg the Ross Drm For Less sign.
RWORP kF_STAFF
-Now.
A1D.10U1s1�Tli°IENT
At 9:35 P.M.to the next regular meeting to be held on March 8, 1993,7:30 P.M.,Conferem Room A.
PREP R31: APPROVED BY:
//_1AA
�—
Thomas R Ro011ard
Planner li and Site Approval Coma ittee
ATTEST:
Dow*_
City Clerk
e
r
C
.. ..
S
i.- 'rf: r.'ta .� t :':tici'
IF,lFi
r•ti -�-itt `rs i1.a: '.a[Y 1 a i >la�ttu I'
ttI. t 1ta;•' IrNr I i ' A: N'It tl t: t: .t;llutslar� w t i'i ul [r:. rr 1Ahttgt
['11tr. r• -�A :1. .0 aac n! .0 �Ir r�' I to ,.a. :'i t.". :1- :+t,irtnart.
fit: �;:[.,{ }-}• 1 •:rI tfyA) lets+ �`_:i). ' ' ar r -ai la• [ A: ►{h.-t h r,r _lt 't t`ut� (,.. 7 ur —
.II I flf rf .t'i to a-J, i1---1 1.11•.4ff 1;'2 1
lut 1.1 Y•r 'nt. rA.0!. u.[: t r. �JI =!,x'tl:M1t'•" rtutuA a,tn�l L.t .t,- r-
1 I.11 it 1`7 r •tt.Il:ti'-ir,t {.• ;r r•IJ t. - 'IJ: fA •1l. :� + 11:.A 1`..•. t 1 r'.: i 1.iq t{•,1I I+:J f✓, ;.i , 11+'.-'i IMI..
a =1 It 1 1 }.;.1. -1 {...lit 1K1a,: L! h•I itt-1 t.P -a` of-' •[Iit I1.:�r 1�_ 'A 1.11.1 4i•- litil i'i
l' P I'ii ta. 4 v it•.w'' D' t} 1`! is 1. 'f.1'r..i K'
lM '".i 1),;Y I1, .'1::. 'llitltl ti'1.[.: 8.-!.s•1. It. :.•r -1' *tl.1 t -41 t-11:�:' {l: ilY_.`:v-M1 til } t ...
y1111111 Fill •tl l 1I'l l l
A4 r176'1 1777,l-11. - �!Y.�!•1'-•: r.•. -11;-f.. .1�. '17 1.' •; t-J:1 r1.=.
�.. -t: r. �.t. 1." t{' S.;-lt. =I(1. L i'. .tt✓.; S Kttd.l,TT— i,i l' r y
[ - ►1 1.1` al:t M1 ":'ri 'Y 1'. 1 1 r�.Ir..' I, i III.M.%i'Ill. '1 'r:. •t I u N tt is .M14 ✓tr tJll;
A
. -�: - 1- a JI il' !'-- 1 I "•�,=, ;.:1,J-t.1.:• r•.•1=t t:. .' .• 'i I. a it.i •i i,•=1. I,.-.t r: '...1' lt: i�..'1:t-1 tt' :t 1..=!" 1,;'l irltl ll�l M:
fy.
1 II II.'�1� - 1.1.1%i ^1�-{•.(«.`.- t :1,ft 1",,(:- =ari. :f .1 nL=�:1 1 t •1 :rAr 1 ;Li A :It %11,Y ••"1. - 1 7
' ' t 1 I it at ry M1I t. x r ar� [;•[a.i ,t.
.. 9III I il I Y =i 11Y 'a' IWTI'J I i.t Ar:1 '.A.fl• "JS.-..� 1 `. '.11✓a l'1:.[ 1)3. I A '.ia'16N':`�':-7C:
,Yia L1. l-el '1.:. ttr. (.. - tf, .t �alpg4,a.4711: 7 t.4 [+i-s 't�4ti {fl L 7-.: �i'�f 1.It• .
".r. 1 I.. 1.." r I1.'.Il l'1 - •1'*1 �-tll.:•-11"[ i't I'1;17 Y'I.-r,.w l::tll't';� '�I�i ll' 1. 7':" 't 'sr'1 i 1.•.' .
I 1-.1 1r7 XVr.'Iml 1P
1 /
F`��� � :r-:;f r Xy"; �i�a s2..s:. ��, "^� "� �e f:d� .a¢.�a.1 4*„•� `�.ar�sg�\�135�•ir
At .
i
:' ! lilt:}i rf:Ir Y "i1n i- :'La• :, 1 Ja .i a
lux
11!:•11T' -t k*:`-i'�311 f T;��111 Y'; �t•-t t'=
.. ..•:'1:-, f}`:1...1� G.: '�'1'i:I',f ,:: 1:. :ti,-^1 4,f1.. ::+:;i a:l':1.•:1-:i' ;1:`.IIY:- :}I'.t ._
1)tT'it l[I[-.:. -5ii i-!: t'.1;«7 :•.}:11.•.T `I lt`: /.. 1-+i'•Tt ltT•S.l l+
7 !ititrl [A., J ;MJ,•c.,.i �':- fl}}J;;-..{7,y;t ii :1:.
lid w st. •t :q.-..•l "-.1 1'dL-17G`i3iP
" 1-1l:lll '1 111'�•+ al • �{ ,i l .1"t-;tlf 1 :1-�11. •1: '..i-t
7.' •1':.• ,H :�vJ �-1. -45 1: ltllti 1"µ .t f•-
{YlllilP
•::'al 11 ".'J A7l'4b E. a-Y/. tF �Y- 11111tt-1 i.b i. t•'t1.='i 535. yA l' I4 j ;i-at '.
tlf7l11iil:Y IY
t- 11711(fJ:117 AIL i:• K t:! '4`_7� :'•I..IiC I.t.t -rJ t)1 1- 1 1'}to '�:/
. :xl ,t 4 t l «.t:uJJ 1131 •rn
? 1:11Lt 1':11,:-: t•5v! 1 1' •IJtlti y.all 1. Iflilt:.i. ! ,l3' `'. - fT. t.'-'t , ,
�:/!ITY(1 '•� 13 �-•I15= }'.1 � 1:-f'F:II. 11.11,�1
/'1 '1 } .1` .'tt'> 11:4.•dli tl. 1 t
t flltx lT Ji-. f - .tt;::, 1 :It :ii P; 1 : 1 f •{ .{'� 1 11
t.;I.itftl
1
1 If"
1 1:
. � ':�. 1•' ,1"� ,, l: 1 nJ�'ars.: '• ,Ina
11.•�.:a 1.I 1
. l
nw{ •11. ,,1'Tit l s
di=i i
a
• 11
,
i �•
♦i .`�•
.aA ,..1. "r. f." F' '-J': .T. ,a .�..�.ttl ;,1 �i'; ::v: ..i• .i8'�Y j'::
C ,
1.=� r a �� i- +' :A ��� a e; , ;W" rc.ia '+;tt• ' 1"- .!� ;. t*-:�.•°�€ ;. : ;l'ra3' (; t t
• i.= 'f}'.�•!..i 11. '.I:. _.-; i `,- ;. -� t;{ :l �11Ci1'{.+':l...I:t r.Y3=1a�
- -Prl Alt .. •?f
l :}n.�1:N--k If111r A M. It
`i}:1 A. -�"-ilY I:e SP:I#:1: -t5-'. :7 f. '-i:t�i/•r: .�,
It W.W IJINIW I'll,
,.� , ..,� �1 at;l•' fit. �T' _:�:.'1!k=.Y_Y�k�:�.>,ll�" ;si+ :{: .� �'h�.lt x. .i ,•7:;�"y
c cr
1 -^lI J. II •:� J l` r -�'-3P- --1:' Ulr Fll}II Ir •P;t Ttc1I>a n ''t:'a+: sa19
L
i;f: -sd't l f"t• �s.c�.itf.;-.,YJt.. 2:_ -'_ �ty�l �srri�f� .Ifl -;y} I� - :.Prig ai°ri i t' $rt d4', itits>sn
- li+! f.11 «:11 il.f; i ,II -�`f SCYI `-1 :`!Y.0 flt. :.ram:rJ:;i�. Ct i.- .it.�-i'.1.•• '+f)l.=t i3" #�Y- .tt �! %E7:J .P' :1'i J. -•1-h.f -.i"
li tl- •"t.1 : -1� -1 1:' .'!f:l l' +:i.11tilt.-SitL• .1�5-:i it`. _a'I' •Y..li .11i1 �l}I..�-a I .N It, 1«-fti' li UCt,illl i! Y.I G1. ✓.i7 { ' "
t -}r.:ilk�,
I I=,a7. lit�•S U: nc.311.i i 1 "-! c i-.1 i-I fIW4 tjW-1 1'-avotll flit•I
I.' '.i iWll 1- -iSl ill i... f.} it.. tliir}i '.a'lf";till f; ";.+ •f i?y.:r- JII.i I1.1` .II_f" Slfial' 1.+'l A 1. i -t :11'liil - •
1..-f. "1':1 I.,' -i'i.�.141.•- IS t•'M1- •:f li
11 Lr 'I � ?I1 %? � �N"d: ;11:.IE:-:+� i.f l li�i. I .II t I- :.•1.i'1. { 11. .p',1, :.Lt r 111 w .II-f "✓..kl 1-' �1 V.tf
. •`i i'- - ,I • fi.•11 i" Ii rq .J1.'.-1H1 t! :I II,1 c;.11 i'I :.It ti C 11- i•
•0-7. J 6 r, •1(I- 'L' :1. l.. �1.: -.�. 11-fi'i '".'it t C.rlli lir a 7L1 r1 '1
1 1�'. P i ✓,:LI L, 'v 116- :.Lt.r:'i' i :If t �yl'j; 'X.. pK �;,ll �1 ' 1 t .F:t.t"'d , I,t `1.,: :..,•t r;dk.�1 .P t 1.
H
•.I: ,.,1. 1 f' snr n. •--:• :,-.«.-..t is -liti • 1 .. - r ' ,- '::i:'a '-1: - :.:_1 •rI.1 a„i
f 1 : IaIll is i
a,
ASACM Manh 22, I
I'll
Tom..Rabiffaid handed m the pertinent smdons of the Draft General Ftm and the Draft Environmental Its Rcpwt for
ASAC,review. He vWnW do the ASAC members may review dw documents and submit commub He 91ted W the
fart dwumcm will be made wailabb to any ASAC member at their aqua . Lastly,he Stated 09 this iOW will be Fly
on the April M 1993 ASAC agenda.
CQ+ll"OrMB It
Committed member Weber expressed came regarding the own signs at Pro Hut and Crown Books.
Commiuve Member Harris expressed concern rqplftg the orange awning at the PETCO building.
Committee ndember Fralich questioned staff actions regarding the orange awning at the PETCO building-
Lim cWcssed concern agardio-an address numbers for Marisa Foods. He stated the numbers are a Bandley
Drive addreo-a and sot a Stevens Creek Boulevard address for which they Sce.
FOR REVIEW
2. &uplication 81. 004,120 Sign Or�j&-Me(Rev130d)-Review and approval of the Cupertino Sign OrUnanae WWsion.
Tb_. Committee Members reviewed the changes which were made at the L-A meeting and made the following
,moons:
17.04.020. Purpose and Latent-Sub-60clion C-add a number 6 to state...Be attractive Mon a citizens point of view.
17.24.060- Wall Sign Size- Sub mmon A.crass the smteno which states... Each basins shall be allowed a
minimum 20 square foal sign Sub4action B,item 1 to statd... 18 inches for signs setback 50 kd or h=
item 2 to state... 24 inches for sips soft&more than 30 fad for business with 3,000 square feet or
more rem of the item 3 to ate... 36 inches for signs setback more than 100 feet for
busies of 10,000 square feet or maw,item 4 to state..48 inches for signs more than 100 feel
for businesm of 20,000 square feet or more.
17.24.130- Ground Sims: information Cozutainad-Sub�ion S-shed address numbers for the range of numbers
for businesses shall be clearly displayed on the ground sip for easy vis%ihW for by passing motorists. If
no g owid sign eat, the sow address no uber or range shall be clearly displayed on the bmitdin&
Street address numbers shall be a minimum of S ids high as required by section 16.04.050 of the
Cupertino Municipal Code.
The Committee teen discussed the review procedure for die Sign Ordinance. They discussed having an annual review and a
3 year review to be done by the director of Community Development and to send a report to the City Council as to whether or
not a public hearing should take place.
Mr.Rabilhod stated that he would discuss this issue with the Planning Director and City Attorney to determine whether it
would be appropriate in the Ordinance or not.
The Committee then reviewed other portions of the ordinansoe and made the following changes:
Under "Cornea triangle",delete the description of uncontmW intersections and refer it to Appendix A which
will contain a copy of C<upertim, Standard Detail 74. Thuy stated that else same should be done for the "Sidewalk site
triangle°and simply refer to Appendix A wa.:r-h will contain Cupertino Surd Detail 7.6.
ASACAMM
at sips e •.
�C than tam 1%12:11t1 ve� f -Cf Section
Wft 17.24-M aad 17.31110. d ail be 1E►tha7�•1�WWft ��rs�... a=of air
17.24.090 and tootaWmpomy sban Vat mooed of,�o
vdvdSW
win&w by EvW=x to ft CbWL 17.32.M
sesviw. JAU 1124.M,ft COMMIM dhOOMdthe 32 Sstompfix,v to be ofa dp gmd 8
A.ft
was mare Were Maltby do Dinctoratcommunity
Mr.RobgWd then exPlaicI'4 the pie of the memo sib go tbm
pr��which he felt ASAC shanld addrem
to 11irWof Of Community . �effi
• w,,,,� d with lefed -- of Director. a+^�J ar. de d"to 1�item 2
BMI&S oficad and Plaa>=to Dit ►hm s W to UM men 17.24.030 E,as is and add
alone. makethe tag 3 and item qned by ilte Dicer% 'MY ag=PW"
an additionral item to state.••Of by toe f 17.24.090. Iton 9 and 10,tt�q dcoided to
change in item 6. Rom 7 and w
leave as ia. I*gaW thaz Cammm Member an
FretidA��ed his veasl�i oaf the Sight Otdinam to the
as the%pl Ordus=m he sM'AD his vet of the Sign
stated be is these to win.
rawa.� the erne or a+o *ft CommW%
C r 1lards stated that she fd1 that C
Member Fmlich's version wanld bdittle tlta efforts whasd,have been tataea 1 a by the Saga tDtdinaatce
and ASAC.
wouhl be w to look at C;o =Ww M Fmlib's 'ons
Commt�Members Weberand wotabd aft at if it waswri n a bow- ►•
as teat$as them were no
CbWtpm=lam slated that he felt the same sq. He stated that the Comminwd=W take a doter bole at
COMMIM
Member frua h's version of the
At Ibis time(9:45)09110M Lim kR.
3. on a 4-0 vW,,with�1m a�nl'ttm'' a[tb a reFW of B,1993 wore�as
submitted.
At 10:15 P.M.to the need regular to be held on AFrat 12, 1993,7:30 P.M.,Coa►ferenoe 1tGOm A
APPROVED
R.ltobillard Aicbu%jorgand
Planner II
A G .
City Clesk
s .
_ CITY OF CUP TINO
10300 TiORRE2M.M.20M.- .CelL 1gFA 9IOP4(4M 2S2a4�S
S�'13�BRR Off'
ARCHrnXMMAL AND RM APPROVAL COMMUM
OF THE CITY OF CIJPWWO FOR AFR&It 1"3,MEMWO
HEM 1N COd+}'PiMCE ROOM A.Cfff RAU.,,
AT 10300 7 Ma M C i 3 M M C.M..Z.M.M.A 9g014
The meefing was cn:;i to order at 7.34 P.M,by Chairperson LiaL
ROLL ff.�.
Members Present Hmft HwIk FwHe4 Linn
Member absent Weber
Staff Present: Thomas Planner 11
POSMON W—M AND Aamunm=MM.r.Ey;;M..�.."a.
On a 4.0 vote,the Commaw agreed to hear.the New Busnessitem first and move item one alter item toter.
MmIr ANIMAL C�MtaiilNt��rrnmr�
-None
FO :•� VIEW:Neer Badwn
2) Application 3-ASAL-93 Wen Coast Sign Co. •Requesting mvkw and approval to mot a ply
® development Mg,p�'�for a bank locate on the North aide of Sttveas Cnvk Blvd app
mmaWy
122&Wept of De Anna.81vd.
Tom ltobillard mviewed flee staff comments and notaal haw the proposed sign pwgram implies with
the proposed Sign Ordinance. He stated that he made an error on fibs square footage calculation for the
round sign in the staff mport.
Mitchell Franklin, West Coast Sign Co., aamwal staff ommeds and answered questions of the
Con mifte M mbers. lb clarified the size and height of tine aigas.
Committee Member Hoxm"that the emus-sore acceptable.
C0nmUttea Member Harris stated that sbe felt the number and sip of signs was acceptable.
Chairperson lam rated that the adds=numbers should be placed on the ground sighs.
Committee Member Frolich questioned the comparison of the proposed Sign Ordmanee, the mstmg
Sign Ordinam and the proposed Sign Program.
Dads gg
OH a " vote Application 3 ASAC-93, was approved aging to the &dlqpandWW.
contained in the Model Resolution with Conditions 1 and 2 added to read as follows:
C°n
1. Five inch high rnWrmw address numbers sW be places on the ground sign
ASAC MUMS
PR
2. 110 mchmm of*e,sip cabinet shall be is inokes.
Sigh Syss- r and WWW to a Ply
3) Applic3dmi 44SAC-93 Superiorat the N c ee of Stevens Crack .
development 6P prwgeaan of as exist bank
located and Wolfe Road.
Tom Rabiltard reviewed the staff notih�g teat be "� the scope RdAllard of the proposed
dg stud
PrOSMOL �,wo she applicant,aft"the staff repo'was ,Torn
sip he would c1Lge his �denial to good. tie sty that � an she
propried
ground signs would be coRmstent color with the,color of all odh�r tenant name and�she
seal color for the wall signs was an amble color.
TOMMS
Cht�Basin,Eureka Bank,Earl Gbbings,Superior Sign'- and Charles P
the land owner,reviewed staff
comments and answered questiow of Camnumn Members.
CommiM Member Frolich gnesbio�d diecomparw of ft pwposed and Seri and
proposed changes tothe sip program;and SWA that do pwVoW vwas *
questioned the colors, y wi= P n0d to siges of
Cr,w Member Harris and
colors in the car. She stated that sle fel3 that there wereo many Seri®r direr
mf mational �, of sire
COIRIAW Member Hoxsies gar�orn regatdmS doe ongPhat! ten
wasting
Newman. t°mounted Ma. He sta d that the wer
sqp e�by the CIP/
xistir�budding
years ago,in order to help ftc&Mec tienam needs for
stated
if
CommitwMembor Hoxsie s
first since dx SW are he will support it. Bethat
tated
this wars a now program be would not support it
Chairperson T.Lm stated the sign proposal vwas ale.
On011
On a 4.0 vote,�yplication 4-ASAC 93 was approved according to the and condom c
in the Model Resolution-
rMew and appwW for=himd�a'a1 design of
4) Application 5-SA Richard t terted on the West mUo ,Ann Way.
a single familyhome
Use paud corrditam require that ASAC wvww d0
Planner Ytobillard ercplai�the Seven SpringsDQCO*y Affii Way. He that
architectural and site layait of the caiston4 lots ore Stauffer azce w� � of she
the Pmp°� house s all the r� returned to ASAC prior to issuance of
landscaping design. He sh WSW that the 10016
0 ca 16 d but die site and architeataral
building P as the landscaping does not of ' City Council ` "
design does. He sagWAW shot ASAC apprM do at this tinge.
Richard Hartman, project architect and Chris and Cindy Hwy, Ate' owners, reN staff
comments and answered questions of rho Committm Members.
Commii'.ee Member Harris stated that the application was acceptable.
Aw
ASAC Rl nutes 4-UM
Commium gibed Hoxwe questioned whether the walnut tree is on use applies property and
whether it will be saved or noL
ng appHc=stated that they were under the 'unpresdou that the wait two was not on their property;
but if so,they would retain the tree.
Comma Member Hods stated that he felt the pry base is a good design.
Cc nnume Member Frahc h questioned the laadscal►mg plan and where the trees would be placed.
Committee Member Lim stated that the house is a good design.
On a 4.0 vote,application 5-ASAC-93 was approved acwfft to the fiuft and conditions contained
in the Model Resohation,
FORMAT.RHVIEW:Ole!Buw- s
1) ASAC 81,004.120 Sim Onfinance revised. Review and approval of the Cupertino Sign Owe
revision.
Conunme Member Harris stated tiaat she had two issues to consWer. 1) She felt the bet&of sighs
being S feet was to bigb;and 2) That we should make provisions to allow For a second wall sign if ant
facing the public right-of-way but facing a parlwg lit or Oder shops.
After discussion between flue Comfew members, Ciouninee Member Harris agreed that S feet was
acceptable. The Commmc Members agreed*a there sbm:d be a prmsime in sectim 17-24.050 to
allow second wall signs if they are not racing the public q&-d way, but face parking tots or other
shops.
After discussion of this issue,Planner Robillard suggested that he rewrite this Sew and return it for
ASAC review.
Committee Member Harris asked Planner Robillard what he fiwnd out regarding periodic review if the
Sign OMmance. Planner Robillard responded that after wscussmg dais issue with the Planning Director
that placing a periodic review requirement in the Sign Ordinance is not the most apprc>lariate answer and
suggest that ASAC send a Minute Order to City Council requesting that the Sign Ordinances be reviewed
on a periodic basis.
Committea Member Frokch stag that he felt that a should be in the Ordinance.
Cbairpersma Lim and Committee Members Home and Harris,stated than they were comfortable with a
Minute Order.
Comnittee Member Hum moved to approve the Side OWmance with the suggested changes made
® previous to this time. The motion died for lack of a second.
•1
ASAC Mlmutes 4-VA3
chairpersonum addressed several of his comments. 'tom being 1) 1b felt the order of sign
nguhWons in Chapter 17.24 should be reordered,in a4ftbstscal order so that E#rd Sign
specificadons would be first, Wall San specifications would be second and Window Sign
specifications would be third.
Planner ltoblIkA sib that the ream Sur having Wall Signs first in flee Ordinance and G=W Sign
soccIA is that every business is allowed Wall Sigars, where as, Ground Signs are only allowed under
certain criteria.
After discussuig this issue,the conmutto Members decided that the existing format of this Chapter is
acceptable-
Next, Chairperson lama addressed section 17.24.090. W shod that this serer should be labeled for
Pr*ectioos of signs and that it is a bit Musing on how the Sign Or&wance regulates rough mountd
sips. M stated do section 17.24.200f should be removed and placed in 17.24.090.
cmmmcmkmbmamosseddwconoqmofwdsigns=dwhWwftsbmWbeWkwWoram it
was agreed auwg the Committee Members that roof signs should mot be allowed and that it should be
plot in flee Frobibitd Signs Chapter 17.20.
The majority of the mermbe-n agreed d a t roof signs tend to be tadW and not anchivmcbrrally integrated.
® Committee Member Frolich disagreed-
Chairperson,
Lama asked float a fiwther example be placed WO the appedm des 009 how to use
diffino fo=W, mpfed m fie Oydmanre,such as,how to figure haw much Vaud mp area a sib
would be allowed.
Chairperson Lam suggesmi, father changes ton section 1724.060 and 17.24.090,stating that they should
be combined wig sew 17.24.060A be rewritten to read; For all commercial businesses or buildings
and industrial districts wall signs shall not. . . Section 13 remains as wrist®and sec&m C to be added
to rid,Wail Sign that are internally illuminated shall be designed in a manor so that the H&source is
not directly visible. Neon lighting used m an ktterimg doh or ac cm of any wall sign shall require
approval f om the Architectural and Site Approval Committec.
-Fhe Commaec Members discussed this issue and agreed in concept of Chairman.Lim's Napstim
Chairperson Jinni also suggested fiat section 17.24.100 should be rewritfn as follows: 1"itld: Widow
Signs-Section A) Window signs shall be permitted for all free standing commercial businesses and in
all roam ercial districts. B) Window signs intended to be our display for more than 30 days sb-11 be
considered wuww signs and shall be conmdereed part of the tonal allowable wall sign area as
permitted in section 17.24.060. C) Should read the same as Subsection B; D) Fad commercial
business may be permitted up to 4 square feet of neon sign
IU C.onmittce Members discussed this suggestion.and agreed in concept.
Lastly,Com mmee Member Lim stated that office districts should be allowed internally
and if so ties section 17.24.160 should be eliminated and all sections regarding ground signs should bc
rewritten to inclink office and institutiord districts and section 17.24.070 clirni nate the refuence to not
allowing internally illuminated signs.
n
i i. 1'.;.1J(11'ISf�:. r{7:3 t.:.a.:. ii v.i a�Y. 1-. /1l< mil=u.- 1! ='1If fi ,✓1.'t ILY....[ 1. ' isi} � i'll:}Ylf;r. '-.1-t. 'l r.:�l. -
C .
;,;j -.r.. .,.f.: 1 ^.is Ir7i'.� -�r �u-t. .�•{I r._sli.!s�. t _.x cl�'.,
�I_1 .11 fill'.1 y:�a
' r
it...
/,1. 11.1.q 1;IA l-I II'i/> :.:1'1 Yi. vf.7 / t!:1•.'7 'li:�i' F1. ..!'l: .t ii IS'Wa
.-i•'Y.
L It 6i'.Via.. :,,it'1 f K i<i(. t[1{r'f.li111t,
1.,:-.f. '..:I .{1} �s.f3 f-.r ♦:1. :17- >:; 1i1'1. I
i'
.'.III',%f:. . ..1 '.. :1' i'+,l f3-I�:Y �:I1 r:" 1. 1.: .:j fY. 1Y{ r`• '1'-Ili /„114t" 1.1- .:: Y31t 'If-ii1" �( 1=.;i F..-:t '.e
smillo-. =f 11 i ti
f, n ' 1f 3 rYir! rr i1, ..I .yi.L
kf,—Ill ! :aV, It, 1333Y7ll i =
p:.
s.�:.�.If=i✓ f 1
S,
y '
Iit•.{'J ,v 1 a:dl 1 'J`i=t ii1; :i i;,.
i
}
1 -
.
K41'
NlAu 1.:, p t
J.
it
I All
�Y'- „may .•a: 1 alrl -1 9'I K iFl ill. «i+:a.t. ea,ss4 !i'- •!,• rtl:lt.t.t-> :u ulu:rl a. .a.{
• ,i}I ✓il R,C 1 " < - - ♦- Y: :.`1 17 CT=} '..al:la ]1 .f,.. :tlb 1
•l�Jl y1.i_:7;.J rS '.1'. .r! K�:'SAIl+: {'t t If= ,1 w,is+t S.l 1�•
.} S" `.(wi.l'. ftl - [Y. 1'- II i:. w(11 S;•' '1:� I`.
it l: :11':i 1.v.t:f.L•1 .k'. I.1:.1 -..-1. 1Y I i -+!1.1 -
am' 1 AJ I �1V "I.1 l.•: �L"
. �. 'r1.4r.ri.r-' •a
} ._I Clr- v1:1 i'1 i':•,lE:t a:1 t•I ,r?:r[.a 7..1;I-1. I,I11, rg117f9T
yj
.✓.i rll.%} � 1„ 1 !.•lrt.,.� ,: i 11 ! t r .-! : arrJl.•. Y,171 Jr.l: .
t. C,t .•. I '1,'. iy/r$ aC.•.-ti ,1�.. -. .:.�1:1 L�t !li` 1 1 11�.+p�-
•:it
y,-
. f•Jfl(�1 1. 1 Ia.YI. ..Ili• �.1.. 1 1., dl_ 1 1 YN 1..:1�. 11 i.1!'i:Gi.. 1: L111r1Y
ai' l d J�' •;{. 11! `t Nl1.-1 'YP.0 IJ 11.' 11.,`
1� v114l I11 l!"- il.
1 iltru 1 aF{.,a
-2-
Mm Cminittee Members ffiscussed this ismhre and the issue 19M in FUML Tt VW
suggested that Chairperson, loam meet with Dam Stamm to rasoh,the if$m. It wn a
pus that the ferr very disappointed that nobody fmw the Chamber of
C the Meeting in order to discuss the issuer. All Camittee Metes fift 9=it
was impertant thud ASAC and the Chaniba t OWO their difflunces and pnsent to COund all
ordinance which has been ally too by
Ccmnmittee Members decided that they would,am last time,have each Cornmittee Member address
anyoutstandingitems which they felt wereimportauttodiscuss.
Committee Member Hoxsie felt do the owe was acceptable as is.
CommiftoMember Weber stated that he disWood with Swoon 17.24.100 staring that a minimm
of 200 feet of fide should be requhv& He&Wgraod with Section 17.24.110 sag 919 the
mwdu urm height of a sign should be h feet rather than S f xt. He disagreed with Sew 1724.120
stating that 5 town names were too many. With Section 17.24.170 he felt that Section Al shy
be eliminated.
MwCommanMembm discussed this item agreeing to she Al,make A2 sewn B and reletter
the subsequent sabous. The last She in seams A should read; Signs may b c WOMW to the
freeway subject to approval of the Arcb banal and Site Approval Cam• Section B s1kmId
state; Signs must be intended for Company Mcgificalim purposes only;be building mounted and
Cagy
not e the sire limitations for kidding odd� P IW in the title.
cruet far identification purposes shall be kept as smtple as passible t0 ai�md
clutter and to aid the legibility of the signs . Lastly,he stated that in SeChm 17.24.090,
subsection B and section 17.32.100 subsection B,should both read the saw
IU Members agreed that bath sections should read as follows: The total area of any
window obscured by any combination of permanent and temporarY window signs shall not exceed
25%of the window surface.
Coo mittee Member Harris asked staff whether the suggestion by Chairimmm L k
reordering the sections in Chapter 24,had been done.
Afwr some discussion, Planner Robillard stated he had slightly misunderstood the intent of the
Conwiaee and would correct it.
Committee Member Harris stated that she felt internal directory signs should be regulated in some
form.
,no Committee Members discussed this issue and it was agreed upon that the issue is covered in
Chapter 17.16 regarding exempt sib. 1< was agreed that Section A should deal with directory
signs only and directional signs are covered under Section E.
Committer Member Frolich stated that he disagrees with Swum 17.12.030 requiring ASAC's
review of Electronic Reader Board signs, freeway oriented signs, decative statuary► and
neon lighting. Section 17.12.100,subsection B,ability Should be champed to a 5'•
-The Committee Members agreed to that change.
u�a
shoug be
� bbothib ad tw 6,0 `
than miduad awl es# mtd ss�a s%of l •I
Zak as s�av F.he s�tit ASAC all
that ft
foof
17.24.1�f,Samcdon
lag tM should be dew.
'lie Commim Manbas agreed•
M 17.20.010, F raaof sEated
'I lae C �y and allow • S 17.24.tf50,
the
h d a� to d-aWy the of 04 A� ' .
subsection A, ft CamdUm w
anW
emmutm members agreed wit&the
Excqpt for mdonfial
dhibicts each bum slH be pamaed am wag SW abed to their
Premises.
1n seetm R,cbmW eachto any.
coamnismMeaaa m Frolich stated that Sadon
17.24.060 wOS " � Od
wislmed that to be elegy better•
'lam ated that setb A as Y as bows fsmn� F i� and
awed to leave as it is.
ii vase agreed amm the C aAWawa lefmmffm prqperty lire and
dimW staff to delcde any► whams contadicted that_
chakpmm Than stated that in Sag m 17.24.060 there was soave canted amsf8 wh7ch wem
at the pwmw meemg•
Plaamer Robillaad sad that he iafmWOCCUOY left the C Drat vahiclt is stated in the
Cho lam tla aerate in the Appadx means that Appgn&A3 should be
Ap A8 �Fle of
cmucted fang office ad Wag""lids h
the 701%m of t0 Wall sWs slued he
The C Mks&cussed.Agp®dm A9 ad asked staff to omkv smo c
M.6ers was to '.M..*0 neon to the of May
to,e 1993 in order for Chairf e ljm to atoms¢with John Stanton to discos*e OutMnft Lssm.
1, On a 5-0 vote,COMRAW
Members comfmued the item to the mccfmg of May 10, 1993 doe to the
aploiic ant not being presem•
INFOgciv`�'` nmerrcaau• ntel 1$aa�iaaes9
3. Cats on the Dmtia General Pion and DEIR.
C Member Harris asked the other Ca»ttee P wl ' waaatsd to submit
asaC amp
a s
f N Wanda
PM
MWcam CamftoW
AEEBQ AIG QE NMEM
4. On a 4.0 vim,vdth CmMhW Mmbcr Weber domWuWof ftuVdar mwftof
April 12,1993 qpwvcd as obmftM&
COMN ARi9'1' E RE�3
Member Noatie asked staff to look iota haves addum mmbm ,placed at tie
Oaks Cent and.Pacific Fres& lb also asked stall:tO 100k WtO the GDIM Offt94M far
om Beach stating that tag►do not appear to conform vA&the sip prqpm
cmmm Mier webef asks smffto look into StMYS BWYCI=Sign On tlra si'do of dw dekveay
vehicle. He,also asked staff to lwk into*0 temgorasy sign at the Mado Ply which has been up
for apply S
Membr Harm asked staff what was being din 69 Symoto Eak an Soll
De Affix B.Wva�d regarding the hg o. TheCumnimegMM&O that the H&ing oo
tho
balding vm a safeEy haWd as it V slag&Ccwy into the stet
The Ian rqpmud an the MaWs hmdmm
® A�DURNMEI�T
At 10:25 p.m.to the nest apilar mocog of May 10. 1993,9:30 per.,Cmfmm Room A•
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
ium ms R.Robillaed �d Site A�C�itUee
Planter 11
A'1TES
Ila
City Clerk
� dyfwAM
c
CifY or Cu tB?>la �
l A al =�Ali! aA1 +' + )
WWWWIMBEGULARM3 !' 'M
ARCINISCIANIAL AND Slid APPROVAL COMMU E
tp MM CrrY cr CUP==FCRMAY 10. IM.
HUDIN ROOM A,
AT I #
IM Sja' � 950I4-The ruing was card to order a 7.35 P.M.by We ChdW=W
ROLL.ICAU
Mew Regent: wed,Hwaik Hmres
Committee Member Lim arrived at 9:35 pm.
Members Ate: Fidicb
Staff Prewa Tlmsnas R Planner 11
POS i`MOPtEM"n AN��D SiTi 'F37"3 T °�'�AGELl11lA�AIE�3ER
-None
N AlFtli�RHAL C+D14QN�LCA`1TQii1S
•None
R®RAItAL ttEaillil;�V` 19ta[
'1) AliNAM AMC II U-9►0QWggn ggW= &MM RcWcgingreview and approval for a
plate dmvlopmm sign prop m far a new offiwIR&D/Womercial CWTIex.Tbo site is loci at
the Southeast quadrant of 1.290 and Dc Arm Blvd.
Tram Robillard reviewed staff=nunents noting that do to ft mv4w naW a of the dwdopinak the
numbered signs being prnpWW are qWWtau and meet ft spirit and agent of both the existing and
proposed sign wftanees. He gated do signs A, B and one C sip are the only signs visible to the
public right-of gray. Ail aver signs are interinal to the project.
Jamie June Horton,Cupertino Gateway Pats,presented flees overA site Sign program. She reviewed
the design concept of each she and reviewed the bist mcal badWound of the sign damp
Committee Member Harm daw hat she was concerned with tie height of sign B and deaf She prefers
the taller scale radw ban the wider sCale of C signs.
In response to Conmn;ttee Member Hoxne's question, Mr. Robdiard explained that under the existing
and proposed ordinance does site would only be allowed only two nxmument signs.
Conguittee Member Hox=stated that the two A signs on Mariann Avenue Slrould be soled down. He
stated that a diet solution should be provided for sign B. He stated that it does not work in tie
overall design oonc%4 of the project;do it clashes with Sign A due to its design and cloSeneSS and that
the tenant names should fit wdbin the sign rather d= "bein ° dre sign. He stated fiat he WW the
overall design concept of the sign program;stating that IV felt dmt dw C signs were very nice but Sign
C-6 seemed a bit tall for being so close to Mariam Avenue.
t
.l4
w-.1
M r6.1 ..S.d Y).•T
I °s
jq
• - 0.( } it'kT! t'_/ 1 1 Y `,t 81 ^.�
"l 91 +i6i i-.� '.-.K b itz 1+}'-• 4: t
'nr •mot t i.'•( ..if..t• te_Itra- 2J f
• - 1 -fi-7 :� t 1 A.-:- {.L 1 /i � ,.,ri:; t i •a. I '.t'4�+t _
- ..Y: vt J•Aft. .A.i )'- ',yF'. �3. r �.. 9-•
i I'n i.1-� It irf f j'.. 9 s�A f It�.0= •{d 1..1..-<. '91k. _
'r yi-K/ TJi:= # U-i .{•.{.t :. ,:'{I •";: "w9 i .-i.-._t v f, ty, -( .,L.jS .h
if J.itiifr..
'1 t_t.' li• is t,7J f. :.i l'i ...• •1.1,''.:. it ('�.
1-• :{1:�.: afi ✓, .2.�f: ri'fFIF!:1..2 fl: :l,t`N. i.+ x-.) f1.F:. TL l±'1 .i179,. ii,•-t; �
.y +. 311.. h G .YY"t }•',1..1, tV: .ii 1:}••t x- '
2�:J Y:•l i. v,•.-•t ia.e -f1.!'. %t•}1 ,.f-
(,r( %itb ] rlll;tl`.- i i Yta.att. nrtl' s Jl.t=1 •.}0• Y.,
,i_ t. � .Y7.- Y-Y.tl"rh '1✓.-1 "f-" 0'-=f = :1 tt{ 'i -
a
t:fll It 1.113= '"ii t'i
t. ,xt?71. %i 1.1 YI 1 •"t l.': Yi .Ail J_...�.. Y: .;r.' - `,b!.Ci.t
l:y
i C ',✓t�.'I`a i'l..LilNfi �:2- i SI.' :I,l".e- .F31� 'r3'
' ,. A ', .. ;, . . _!Y'r :11itr'.t /• IfG 1'1( 1 {,` I I fle.( fit1'
f',y.
Nfill
�Ifr•'1. 't.. 1 t'i.':A 1.1..4�:•c. I-.- .; },f-{ �t% it fV :rx It9'� '
- I a_<,.;1
$il'1{IJOf
it it If;
I.I,,I I r
�a f
1-
ti- A xJd..
:ii .' i, ;;. :....:. W�Cyi.. 4..1 ,.::t 1 •-'.�a rF`l:{ :1 i.rf ,`.111 Jl r �'id-.y.' C(.- 'stir -� :� v,.S:i f...1}..
1�.J.. :k.7.1 ea' 1.1 iw;� K.I T LUS_d.•.
' l b' `.� ... .`�{:,IL 1,i i(.a7.1:> Lti.o`3.1...._'.F�', •- .
t� <a.G'4' i. �-� rl {; :mil •ter:Y{i:i �.{._.r- � t. Inr.J r,`�:
ti idf
.'._ ".:,.,,YI (-11:' 1..- '{':�.-..ItJll: -A':. •.:::n.( .Tk.t ,t�tk. t4'1:
1:61'1
r. •e. .:..1 :.a. ':it J, k I'.w: A a:7-
NI-� �-w :CI.:"tl } I l.,y:. t4•,:i}: #-1 4)- 1 fa 'A IJ.�
1-.. s`dl•1 ,.J y! Iv,it..✓.r :.t `, ..1 i.{.....�:..e -i:�
ibl a:r.
ct1t(r '�lY..+tl1 1 •ii.: Y..1f'.t t.{ uli 1 qkn• T'+i ^_#) :.ittt d
.. ✓.rJtc;li:' '.•F 1 O' t=tT dl c _r iddl ` ;�.aii:'
im
11 "'•�='1'-.I.I:f I �f l:�'.i CSi-•' ': t4+'t' -
d✓,• Y..l�1� �.-� 1- r 14.1 _{IH K Tit 1. II� :hilt li tllt!%1{ �• :/:1 Y1 ^.
7kil ,d/:•l.frt J(. .',4- '•'n+
S • { 1
'I •;fiF IIIII :•TI 7::1'� i)•xI=2' t
+1 ,.IN �71Fh*PP 1 lir .1 f 1FKdf. - i. .iY t ♦ 1- { .11 1'-i r.� ♦' '.�
, 1 f ✓,.I' 111 it t,, 'i... 1'
-3 al+ •� 1 a:war; J1 t':
_ (r �iIY lll.Xl' �• 1��-�'i d^ �1` t 1:.' »t -1..,
a k 1 711)+)1Pf II 3%d.61 'Ytt9 J- 1.id'r;#Itd Y =1J1 i d.' 14y i.i { lFi
a' >ill 1.�:y v:.1:1 .l•i+ d1-1. ''{vl ti'Fll
•,1'11 tt1 t:{J%
-:xi1 i�?. ,1{i '.: k`f,i` ,. 1%d ;t•:T :Ik• t l -
�,i'.I r:+i.. '•.. i T.LC.�. L: 13 FX'+.{{1H' •'d.-.
1 -✓'.1.1.1'11. -.1-;111-Cil {C;1, :e C`- r-.may.11!.
�.P 1,.i.- •. } i. .. 1:IJJJ I111':� ::.L{):-1 - ..U-:1:-. 1 `F>+tI'jl + l:) I A:
1,•
. .yl.
All i tit
•1i.r:u 1 CIF/ �d `i.uli.� I:
..I.I:1 1. - 1 1 v• 1'1fT1,�111.4. 4111411 1
•.r. �
Ikk-
p�
Y
- i
too gr•;
t.
-•7 Y'. It
.irt. � • }.;t:1+.. is •_,-F1 :ut-:, t, •, �:�< 1�iti[/: :F :w,.a-t
t,
. 9. - '? y dt.. t.=1•l. ^_d .1 -ii"—.:'LA1'` IF:
Or .A
t•.
� ,•, r IIc lty,wF,:=1
:It1t:a 1
,a
CIT1i �P CtD�EBt'YBI�0
IBM
10300 Ti3 � � p �4 �5►�-4i
' 11+41i1�6 � S t
A1ttC �� AM Ai.��
CW THE CITY CW CUpMMW FM MAY 24, IW3,
MWMG
Una U4 COMMCS ROM A.Crff HALL.
AT 103l1b'i E 17A1® CAINUI� IA S id
The mwft was aalM to order at 9:37 P.M.by CMMOO'B Lim
RQUf CALL
Members Present: Lim.Weber,fie.HwV,Frolich
Members Absent: None p it
staff PreseSt sTn
PL
trNDA Llt
-None
WHiTT�N AND VENAL CpA�VIU1�iHCATItDNS
-None
FOltlttiA[.1$���' N to ill a 8II
1) Anulication AAC S-Af;A�C-93 Ct�'d;n Sim- and ata 130 ftbd Sum►of
emsting mop
center.located on the FA9 of Do Ana
Silveiado Daulevaad.
the sign met all tlm of the
planner Robillard wAgwW the staff Commits noting in the siaSf He stall the the
new and current SIPwi* of the item
ouffiniedapplicant was willing to work with the staff to con wih the height dtlre to as and members.
Craig Maynard,Cal Neon signs,
wvw%,ed staff oamments and answerer!quastWw of the Committee Mom•
Committee Member Frolich had no MMUS with the Pam'
Committee Member Harris felt the tenant letters should be the same knight as the addw s numbers. The
address numbers should be grew to match the sign Colors
Committee Member Weber
whether the CarrotsRestaufam was Partof the same Center as thejr
Dave an misft sign ally.
planner Robillard state Cw"Ws was part of the whole Cceter•
Commmitiee Member Weber s he had Concerns that this was a second ground sign.for the center which did
not meet the frontage criteria,and further tee sign does not have a center name.
Committee N&xg er Hoxsie stated that he felt the same as Committee Member Weber.
s with the and stated that a sign is needed as the tenants have
Chairperson lam stated he had A problemsip
i and a.existing De Anna Ceram sign are too close and a
very little viss'bilit!!but that the proposed
gn
combined sign or modifications of either one should be devetolvd.
or lack of a second
Committee Member Weber moved to ding the application,which died f
Counnitte�e Member Harris moved to CGIOnVe the item to the meeting of June 14 in order for the applicant to
De Anna Center sign be modified to
revise the sign plan with the direction that possibly ceW ilto the proposed sign-
advertise CWTOWs only and that the Oe Anaa Center
IN
ASAC*bfivaks Moy 24,1 3
7U qVk=was elm directed to bring in color WWk%pbotagrapbs,and have sty resre$on the
badkgmund of ft CaraWs4k!tea Cenr sign.
WowL 1MM:tlils 01d Aphnn fern
Zs
j�� ASAC 11 IJ90 -
phmmd Pry for a new offs &D/ ' camplex.Ths site is at
the Souftast quadrant of 1280 and De Am Blvd~
Torn Robillard reviewed staff Commem noting that ASAC rcqmted the appl,carrt to MIU1 with
ens to signs B and C6 and signs A on Marian Avcm-
Cmmuttee Member Harris will abstain fim this item due to met of interest.
Jades June Horton,Cupertino,Gateway Parma,and Seca Cuyler,sq p designer,presented fe scope
of dse Pmlm and reviewed die badWound of bow the signs were designed and developed- TheY
addressed der scale of dw signs and how nary relate to the building,.
Committee Member HDxcje stated he him the veriiad scale of signs C6 at the 10 foot height. Ile stated
that he Wees with the sued down version of the A m p for Marian Avenue but feels drat the size
oould be increased so that it would be in between the size and the sew proposed vers100-
Lasdy,he stated ire does not Mo sign B;feeling the sign is too big and clasbes with der design of sign A.
Member VrJeber stag he bikes the overall sign pry with the won of sign B. He
stag that he feels sign B does not match the quality of"rat of the signs designs. He stated he prelbrs
the sealed down A version at the end of Marian Avenue and Possrbly a sign 9OW down in between the
original versions and the smaller version for the Srst cmgm on Mariam Avam Ludy.he stated he
pr&rs dw C6 sign to be 8 feet bigh.
committeeMember Frolics felt that the A sign was okay,the tcaoant pand on do B signs should be
reduce to ow.foot;the A sign at*0 end of Marian Avenue should be reduced to the 6 foot height and
sign C,as orig4mlly Proposed,is ale.
amuperso►Lim stag the A sign was acceptable and that the.A sip at the end
of der C sign but
should be scaled downs. He stated he had no problems with the original height
pressed comm °t A'h the B Op. He stated dw B sign was too high aril books hbe a temporary SIP.
ex •
In response to Coa mittee Member Lim`s question,Mr.Cuyler stag be can reduce the size of the sign
Proportionately but would refrain fiom simply shnakng eats of dre Panels.
Chairperson Lim suggested that the Cormmom vote on each of the signs seParately as dsere does not
seem to be a consensus on the entire Package.
Committee Member Frolich made a motion to approve the A signs on De Anza Boulevard and the first
entrance on Marian Avenue as originally proposed and dw A sign at the se=d entrance on Mariam
Avenue should be scaiied down to the 6 foot 4 inch height.
II&motion was approved on a 3-1 vote with C.ommiUW Mead weber dissenting.
Committee Member Hoxsie moved to approve the C signs at dw 10 foot height limit. On a 2 to 2 vote,
with Coma mee Members Weber.and Frolics dissenting,the motion was denied.
ASACtfiniiin
r
Commftw Member
Wdbu ma&a modw,w approve do C sAp at the S fixt hatabt It d 3 fiir luk of
Cmmaw Member FWIM moved to Wwo that>C sign as originally pwpowd at do l l Not
IU motion was decied can a 2 to 2 vc to wfth Committee N cubWs Weber and gl'n*
Committee Member Ifcocsie amwed his mofwn to approve the C signs at the 10 fixt hdgbL
On a 3 to 1 voter,wfth Committee Member Weber disseaft and Cmmittee Manber Harris
the C sign was approved at 10 W high.
Ater dmwssmg the potatial options for the B sign with the whet,the Committee unanmm*.
agreed to contimie approval of do B sip until the meeting of June 14 so the applicant cmild rada r it
v db the Mowing duacdow 'iron cent of flat B sign was not accgoble,sash d=M be styled more in
line vide the concepts of flee A and C signs. Mw letbmdag line went is too small and wOUJd be difrcuh
to read, IU pctcatial ides would be to cluster do tenant wanes as styled after the D signs.
Derision
On a 3-1 vote,application ASAC 11.U-90,was approved accoift to do fiv&V contained in the
Model Resohntion wiffi Ffiufing 4 dcbftd rmd CondWous 1 and 2 added to read as follows:
onrlat M
1. The approval is based upon the sign criteria palge dated May 24, 1993 cog 9 sheets.
2., IU B sips are not approved as part of"Resohidion and are cmthuA to the of Juv 14,
1993 with the direction as given by A.SAC at flee mactimg of Mr y 24, 1993.
3) AMC_91004120 Sigg Oxdinancc(itedao-Review and approval of the Cupertino Sign
revision.
Committee Member Harris moved to approve the Sign Ordinance as submitted accoift to the findwp
contained in the Model Resolution.
Committee Members Fwhch and Weber stated they would am vote for approval.
Chairperson Lim,Committee Membees Harris and Name dismsed the snake-rep of the Rooiutiow
Committee Member Harris hated out a model resolution for the C,ommittec to acoept regudmg
approval of the Sign Ordinance.
After dissanssion,it was agreed that the Committee MemWs Harris'resohdion and the model
resolution,as prepared by stall;should be combbmA
Committee Member Harris'version of the resolution is labeled as such and dated May 24, 1993. ,s
® `iU last pmouph of Commium Member Harris'resolimm should be written to state: and*wcftw-,
be it further resolved that any Sign Ordinance proposal written by anyone individual be filed for
oonsideration when ASAC or any other cemmium is charged in the fitture with further Mvisions.
x
s �
s
,51,004.120
on a 3-2 VM with W ate Fv*& in tbO t
Sim wss Harris.
combiaw with an resohilim submitted by C4mmism Member
MWM OF Mm*a Fwh& tbO Mn oftb@ May
4) On a 4.0 fie.with COMMAX
10, 1993 wore qw..d vath the
Pap �h to the a m '
3,it�3,last dwV
pongtaph
with the same item
o :mEfflEMM of abaft dm Pizza Hot OF WUML
Comfivo Member FrOU&q=fi0WW the P
1n response,Player saifiard gtwd the City AMUNY was wftft lids kssue.
Co..w.Member Weber OW staff on the pm
ofthO bw *the pSTW aw=*and the
Chiba Beach 94.
Member Harris had no c
Member Haxsie stated be win submit hn front ASAC this wegk and"wt71 be his
® Lid •
' Mew the C�awards� at 7:00 P.M. 1:.e
Lim ASAC.
tbau 11R..W Hoxsie fcr his 6M mph+ wd
BlgQitT OF STR
Plate Robifiard had nothing'o ICIPW4.
eess[9L1(tt+1MMEEI�IT A.
At 10:?0 P.,M.to the nod��T of Ium 14, 1993, 7:30 P.M.,
PREPARE®BY: APPROVED By:
XO� Lam,
Thomasl; R,ebillar�l dual and Site AppWral COnmftw
Plasm"II
AITEST.
J 4k&-47
norms►COMclius
City clerk
0,tl gumVAS •12493 ( Wa4rss)
I N
s i.laet„I �
1.= al. .,1a1 •. L i:::t n c,. t.+a' i� iir>rr-r-� ;>:.a :.•Ji
ITT
r ' r .r...
i¢' tt r.ttnr;t' a; r t, :rul I{ •
r;1,
VT 17
r:A:
A' +`I;1 'd.i:- ..?jt^�'rl'I '• --i G•' Y{'t afi it:l= � lr It^il I' !-L'-011 7 .'1 9b 11 'tl
_ +►: .er.!•- ;l .( .Alin uarra:r ! c' :r'i t E'.. a:i,.l
-i t '•'I 11" 1, 1't 319' �:+11 tSi .1.K!"-1�. 171 ! r-. + 7 J'- t'' ',
5+111.
1.,•f' •.7 \:'ill 1 l) '.-L'.^ Y`-rl :1 '.i .�11. :f- ;11!d /t .::.':i lt(:t �: A' 1? r.i.T:..'L� -
,.t Iritl llitr' ,-14r'1.-1 r �'r'�. .`.I.TI...� 1`. � 'lf H�')t«r i. It I :' ";1J.j: .1•} >,_;. /',. 1-r.l':":1. `r%I t.
tO it .,,a {i' r'-Fr✓.rO
_ .ir- a i' •�ar�r lr.�.ri-�# ai.r ra•• 'tllr A 1'alru" r•.
I'.� A'.Il Irli li'-- 11.✓G'l-='i 1 ... :..... -:t11. �:.t•il .rr
• «y Yfli..A 11 f"i�it -:.`I'/r 7 +:'17'
4M 13:',++'- 1`"i.• li'.Y: �i .14'A3 rJ.t 111:li"
t w:;i.'' 1:.1' 11 1 1 Ill.i•=1Ik 7"_At'ti '
'1 vi' -.5.111 •-fill Li I11.' .K:t-1 �.i' .Il i 1,� .
- i 1'I.I(1:1 11- Il::l:+, '.A, 1. ...1 I'.j,�.1' .i,: ;i'-a 1, •ti. 1-.
A', Y'•.7C :.L,l .I'II I U.i 'L1nrI..1=;.? '1?. .�lr'R'. .I it a t
1
:r .11• ,. 1, 1'. 1 r{.di111P1 .1 :1�!71 -,T .'If
r :1.1''L) 1 = •17 �-'1! 1.,� :l I AI t',Ji : l i e,tl,/.'i Y I' .
1 v r rt r a 1 1 p ,,,. ;r,.A ✓11 Ail ' '
� .t Ilt:l.r':.l 1. 1."• II{:A�= -�":f I IA.11"I '�1.1 1.1'.il'i 'J: :I1.1 If!Illly:/. 1.l,rl `A: I,{
r_I:-A M.Ifi J'III'
'1'1.1.frlj:f :111 +:111;11 1 Y11 :'LY I;F.:f 1 P •, f...
>v ' `
A&W Mhmo Jane 14. 1l1931'
Page-2-
I. Thtd the Fwased sign is caiisfted a third mommuM sign f w the &j and oval of the sip is
an euq9w ito the dp code.
2. Tbal the liturd eriftegmew of the provisions of this odium will nub in jesmictions inconsistew with
11m spirit and I I I of this
3. TbW the gr nft of the exceptim will not result in a condition which is mate Way denimental to the
public health,safety and weliime.
4. That the viception to be granted 6 one that will require the hwst modification of the prescribed
regulations and the minimum variance that will accompm this paw
9. The approval is based upon the sign elevation criteria as approved by ASAC on June 14, 1993 camps as
may be amended by the conditions enumerated herein.
12. The sign body shall be a maser of 61 in height.
13. The namnber of tenant names shall be limited to S.
14. TU root structure on the DeAma C,ents(CarroWs sip shall be removed conciumudy with lion
of the approved sign
2. Application ASAC 11-U-90 Cupertino Gateway Partners - Requesting review and approval for a planned
development sign program for a new office R&D Cammexcial Complex. The sign is located at the souticast
quadrant of A 280 and DeAm Blvd.
Jadde Jrme4iorton,Cupertino Gateway Pa¢tms, reviewed the scope of the pwject noting that the
redesigned the sign according to ASACs dire him at the last meeting and that Apple Comer found the
propoosl unacceptible, She requested a decision flom ASAC regarding the proposal as presented at the lax€
meethig
Chdqwson Iam restated the reasons why they thought the sign was unacceptable at the last meaft that
being it was tam high and did not wak well with the other signs for that center Cwmftw Member Wdxr
seated that he did not lace the proposed sign at the last two meedngs6 had not changed his mind and would
reoonumn I denial.
C unittee Member Weber moved to deny elm application,the motion died for lack of a second.
CommOn Member Frolich moved to approve the application with an overall height of 8 it. Committee
Member lam secondcO the motim
On a 2-1 vote with Committee Member WdWr dissenft Application ASAC 11 U-90 was
approved according to the findings and conditions coonmiedt in the Model Resolution with con(knon 1
modified to rpsd as follows:
Condition 1: The retail tenant sign B dated Jone 14, 1993 is approved as part of this application with the
overall bight reduced to 8 A.maximum
3. Application 9-ASAC-93 T.W. International Company - Requesting review and approval of Architectural
Detailing for Agnes Site layout of a single family located on lot 188,Dorothy Ann Way.
City Planner Wordell renewed the scope of the project and taiwated oft concern regarding the landscaping
and architectural detailing on the left side of the brWding. Site also stated that this lot is in covered under the
new hillside policies in the General Plan. She stated that areas with a 30%or greater slope are considered
unbuildablc. In her calculation,a portion of the building is lid on an area where the slope is greater than
30'�/a She stated as the applicant was in the process of submittal at the time the General Plan was approved
that staff would consider thi d test case and as staff considers the location of the building to be the best
location on the lot.
. A
l
8
Sty am and TMy Wamra.
tho le8el¢3e offhe b $which addedand doa►s Oft tl�aril
and the atanOM Of
The go an fhe food was old shaold be
�the lot. mintmftd in
T�
" Weber
'� also&=PA doluvz on the right � of flea an adiftiond condition levidins �s. wilh go
plea add more archhccMddr..r to 1e11 elevation.
a. �AMCM � toResohdon ti
Oa a 3-0 vote vM Candy 11 aVA 12 adde'd to read as folYm WM
coneained in the Model
Coaditloax shall flee armed to & loft as on the
11. mWification 1ba dam lM 14.1"3. shall
ftpo=PW alien be ubmMW to Maalb whh the The t'"W
12. btinPb"l ?A8ny on fire dte.
end aplmvat fxm to
4. 1 - comer at the soutboM car=of Stcvts Cs&
an ar�dng
Boalevard and Poreal Avenue.
® Cyly ply W that elms is thea minor on of the use grra�crhich the Director
is val repvding ASAC apPto
oMMiM
Shemod Marshall, A flee MP Of flee Pry ad answand of the o
ambers.
The the s3-ie a hour hm of aft dU fde buitdi `M of Flee
ass
Ouffi iaa and since them b Was developld in an incnmcnW MOM-
Ded&x On a 3-0 via,
a5-ASAC-92.2 was M11W--Mtmg to the fi~and MdWmm
conwAsed in the moM dam with
5. Approval of -On a 3-0 vote.the mimaes of fltie NOW m d �•1993 were
the followinS :
s1�4ald read"Vise and member
Fad 3,third paragraph. shanld tad .�a 3-1 vote w�itic� Ch�+*9d�n w
pap 3, sew l��h at 10 ft.high.•
llarr;s was
Page 4,leaf para"h for item 3 should seato the WO Md Web" � APFhcoon ASAC
y� O,: pee a 3-2 vote with C
combined with�won was to the cormined in teh Model AesolemOn
as omb
a 1 c 0 Sign mnbanitted by CowmOmba}lams.
Corr��l>fE
a ked staff to r ors tt�China Beach sign, the Petao Sign and the Town Ceeeter
Committee Member Weber
Signs.
s
W.ltobiilard stated that he wasso worbgg on the China Beach PPand he *A flee StWs Bicycle sign
on their at Fond Plus was legal
` {}i Ed liAV 1:.. :c wtl l'.n- s ta,l.3r Y. 1�% •x f...# 1. '.f."4. l,_-Y 'F.'v A •:.1_ �-kl�l"i_. �.93. .yW -
."�"'- .. ,.. ..aa- 1„a.. �:,:. '.;ram 4 .;" 4'�:A ..:i=-. �t.q:.:"n: .,.yq-L .�s�"' t;o:, t-- w#a.; ♦t_fr, -
77
.1T _
ta+
r `
Tit
tl#-
rip
. t
!p; .�,` -,�.- ry_�y�yp •'+,�,8-. .' ;,;��.'r� s xl—•-a -Z' - -T�'y`.��:. }.�.>.. .+�'��� 4' 'I. ..
4- }'
' yt } � y. • r>tl f it '-�:
o,
I' I:1�;•. i'.! ✓,,Y-c-.- i. .•hi ,i , ..l'IfII
ry �r 1
l r r r ri P
i
_
F ? J
a r,
y:
ti.
j
Y
sa'
0-101- IS
t,
CITY Oft c 7 - s8
10300 TORR1E rWO,CALWOFMA 95014(40*252.4505
bM I M OF ME REGR AR hOMMM OF THE
ARCHITEMRAL At&SfM APPROVAL COU%ff'M
OF THE CIw or CUPERTM FOR RILY 1% 1993.AGFnNG
HUD IN CONFERENCE ROOM A.CffY HALL.
AT 10300 TORRE AVENM CUMTM t'AUFORNIA 93014
The meeting was called to order at 7:40 P.M.by Chairrmon Umi
LOLL CALL
Members Present: Lion,Weber,Harris.Frolich
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: 'no 'is R. Planner ff
POSTPONEMENTS AND AD.'UST'e7[E29'F5 TO THR AG1E14DA
-None
WRITTEN AND VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS
-None
CONSENT�CALENDAR
On a 3-1 vote with Committee Member Harris dessend g,Items 1 and 2 were removed ffoin the Consent Calendar.
EMAI.1IEVl-W: New Hnsiness
1) Aonllcatlon 13-ASAC-93-Aeadla Ve�nnry Clime-RequestiaStaview and approval of a ground sign for an existing
office building located on the northeast corner of Stevens Creek and Foothill Boulevard.
Committee Member Weber Westioned how the base was going to be constructed and questioned whether the site had
over 200 R.of frontage.
Decision:
On a 4-0 vote,Application 13-ASAC-93 was approved according to ilia findings and conditions contained in the Model
Resolution,with Condition 2 added to read as follows:
Conditions:
2. The address number shall be added to the bottom of the sign.
2) Application WASAC-93 Center for Sm4ems Management- review and approval for a ground sign located
at an existing office building on the southwest corner of Tantau r vemw and Pruneridge Avenue.
Committee Members Lim and Weber questioned the appearance of the posed sign.
Planner Robillard presented a photograph of the sign.
Decision:
On a 4-0 vote, Application 14-ASAC-93 was approved according to ft findings and conditiom contained in the Mod--I
Resolution.
" 71 MR,�7
rr ws
ASAC MhuMa duly 12,1993
Page-2-
F(DPJ"L SF �Y: old 13rrsrnesir
3) Appllcation l-ASA -CpmmOao Coax lop of.fah Re4tiostitig faview and approval of minor
modifications to the landscap plan for an existing church located on the south side of McClellan Read east of and
a*certt to Highway 83 Corridor.
Decisi-u:
On a 4.0 vole, Item 4, Application 1I-ASAC-93, was moved to the end of the agenda due to the applicant not being
present.
FOPJ4AL AKVIK : View&smm
5) Application 20-U-96 -JMB Pe+Wz tea (The Adis) - Requesting review and approval of a minor dmnge to a use
permit to allow outside seating and landscape review for an existing remm= located at the Oaks CenW at Stevens
Creek Boulevard and Mary Avenue.
Manner Robillard reviewed the scope of the changes being proposed by the Colhe Society. He stated a planting area
with low shrubs and vines would be constnict( ';hound the outside seating area.
Committee Member Harris questioned the eoliv and materials of the seating.
Committee Member Weber questioned whether there were going to be outside speakers, and what kind of impact that
would have.
Committee Member Harris also reiterated that concern.
Planner Robillard suggested that this concern be request to the Planning Director rather than being put as a condition of
approval for the landscaping.
Decision:
Or a 4-0 vote, Application ASAC 20-11-86 was approved according to the findings and conditions contained in the
Model Resolution with Finding 1 modified to read as follows:
P`indings:
1) That the proposed exterior remodeling and landscaping will be a benefit and asset to the center and community and
impr-ove the atmosphere for the applicant and the center.
4) Application 12-ASAC-93 - Brinker Intl, LQM's) - Requesting review and approval for minor architectural
modifications and a sign program approval for an existing restaurant located on the south side of Stevens Creek
Boulevard approximately 3001 east of Blaney Avenue,
Planner Robillard placed a conference call to Kim Woodard,Brinker International. Planner Robillard reviewed the scope
of the project noting ASAL needs to approve the colors and materials being used to remodel the exterior of the building
and approved the new proposed signs.
Committee Member Frolich questioned whether the existing monument sign would remain and be changed. In
response,Mr.Woodard stated the monument sign would remain as is.
Committee Member Frolich stated the signs size are reasonable due to the length of the building.
Coro,-itwa Member Harris felt the signs wr a acceptable and suggested increasing the number seats in the restaurant as
it is a popular avourant. t
ASAC Mbrites Ally 12, 1"3
Page-3-
Committee Member Weler stated he had Iudiems with ft signs,that they are too and m e many and does not reflect
the two modification to the prescribe requivonents in the Ordinance.
Maas Ward stated that they are cartaidering am installing the neon sign over the front eattance due to economic
c.astmints and stated that it would to her to have that sigh not approved with the sign fang Stevens Cry
Boulevard approve.
The Committee Members felt that this was acceptable.
Decision:
On a 4-0 vote,Application 12-ASAC,*13 was approved warding to the findings and conditions contained in the Model
Resolution with Finding 3 modified ana Condition 10 added to read as follows:
landing:
3) That the proposed sign is approved as as exception to ilea existing and proposed Sigh Ordi umm whereas;neon sign
SD 3.02 is consistent with the spirit and intent of the Sign Ordinance,is beneficial to the public health,safety and
welfare and the proposed sign is the least modification'n the prescribed and the proposed regulations.
Condition:
10) Neon sign No. 1 SD 3.01 is not 4 proved as part of this sign program.
3) Annlig ien 11 ASACA--Cntrer4hno CongMgjtion of d1ova6 Witness on a 4-0 vote was continued to the muting of
July 26, 1993 due to the applicant not being present.
Annnov�J of Minutes
6) On a 3-0 vote with Committee Member Harris abstaining, the Minutes of June 14, 1993 were approved with the
following change:
Under members present: Committee Member Hoxste should not be included
7) The Committee felt that no minutes should be approved for June 29, 1993,as there was no meeting.
Comm jft RenoM
Committee Member Weber asked staff to look into the monument sign where Pacific Fresh used to be to verify c.hether it
meets the sign program or not.
Committee Member Lim asked staff to look into 11he condition of the gas station at the southeast corner of Wolfe and Miller
Avenue. He stated that weeds seemed to be a big problem there.
Report of Staff
Staff reported on the City Council action regarding the Sign Ordinance.
ASAC OWN
My 12,1993
A1�arnm�a4
At 9:15 to the aead tamer neeft t®be hdd an Agy 26, 1993,7:30 p.m.GORhfeM ROM k
p by:
Thomas IL Rdbi WayLfDt 1�awmam
Arc --eaWW aW Site AppMW Cwumfttw
Rob t.Deputy City C1
Robert Wt.
W=V sWWin71293
WE
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 TORCKE AVENUE,CUPERTINO.CALIFORNIA 95014(408)252.4505
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MELTING OF THE
ARCHITECrURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE
OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR AT I ,GU,aT 9, 1993,MEETING
HELD IN CONFERENCE ROOM A,CITY HALL,
AT 10300 TORRE AVENUE,CUPERTINO,CALIFORNIA 95014
The miming was called to Dower at 7:40 P.M.by Vice Chairman Weber
ItOLL CALL
Members Present: Weber,Harris,Frolich
Members Absent: Lim
Staff Present: Tom Robilhgr&Planner B
POSTFMMENTS AND AMSTWNTS TO THE AGENDA ORDER
-None
WRITTEN AND VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS
-None
EQ_4 &L REVIEW Old Business
1) AnnlisOl n S-ASAC-93 Richard Hartman - Request of review and approval of i t !aatdscape and grading plan for a
single family home located on the west side terminus of Dorothy Anne Way.
Planner Robillard reviewed the scope of the project. K-noted that the applicant indicated that preserving the walnut tree
is an important priority for them and used his concern with the amount of grading which is proposed on the lot.
Planner Robillard stated that the new General Plan policies require developers of hillside lots to pork with the natural
contours of the land and minimize the amount of grading. He suggested that the lawn area be eliminated and left in its
natural state.
Richard Hartman,Project Architect,and Cindy Henry addressed staffs concerns as follows:
The walnut tree will be preserved as it is an important aspect of the land to the owner.
The gradir:g plan was redone in order to allow the guest parking to be placed closer to the house and to add a small
lawn area. Mr.Hartman indicated that the civil engineer indicated he could grade the lot without importing any fall.
Committee Member Harris stated that she did not have any problems with the grading plan and the lawn area She
expressed some concern regarding the width of the driveway saying that it should accommodate two cars passing each
other. The other committee members agreed.
Decision: On a 3-0 vote Application 5-ASAC-93 was approved according!o the findings and conditions contained in
the Model Resolution with Condition 3 added to read as follows:
3) The driveway width shall be a minimum of!6 ft.
Approval of Minutes
2) On a 3-0 vote the minutes of July 26, 1993 were approved with the following modifications:
Page 2,Sth paragraph to read:
Board Member Vernon indicated that no residents had spoken on the landscaping issue at the Planning Commission
Hearing.
Paragraph S.last sentence:
Additional should read addition
Fpy
+ A$R+C Miks
Awn 9.IM
Faarsagra�pl4 9,
Comma Harris moved to end the gpogd Mohatiitn created by Staff to require that the p
Weny
GwM Mostby Me be� and o1 one to three UM 15 gallon size up to a
mwdmum of$ISO-0W*OM0 pV tab ;,laming ctmM with the tree typechosen by t
gtpb 1D,1a to read: p tgr arm.
If the proms}+GWM does wm tree pisnw g,the plantatag shaft be--Weted prior to the final biding im mon.
NP 3,under report Of IMM.Mond and tblyd sentenew to rUd:
Committee Membins were gives a CW of the Were+Si. inane,which will be On September 16, lace.
Staff s that ASAC wodd through 0,, ., lace and stated that dte
Phu 18 the later part of Dgsiga Chatette woWd take
Committee Member Frolich asked if staff?VWd come back with a CodeEnforcementaction on Aas
y Mountun
spwal sal�activities. Committee Frolich stated that he would not be a4 the ASAC Meeting on amefing of for the
Septes „r.
R Wort of Sta
Alone.
Ad �tfleiat
At 8:40 to the neat Mgolaf meeting to be held on August 23, 1993,7:30 p.m.Conference Room A,
Prepared by: Approved by:
(!mo�ww
�Jr1
Thomas illard,Nammmef it Tom Weber,Vice Chairman
Architectural and Site k,Paval Committee
Attest:
Kim Smith, City Clerk
g/mm/aaWming"3