Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMonta Vista 79-2 Annexation ANNEXATION MONTA VISTA 79-2 1 of 2 1979 ®� f i' son dose.Collfomis 95110 unty Of Sens, Clare t .M9110► Ares Cod*40 lifOM18 tM>0 o G>O---n O Df ryLIA� Ci G Z2 A r O C� Ss OZOO LM mm �Z oxoo �, -i r M c zin o o OP � c CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION I, Paul E. Sagers, the Assistant Executive Officer of the Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission, issue this Certificate of Completion pursuant to Section 64460 644et/35351 of the Government Code. I hereby certify that I have examined the resolution for a change in organization/ a attached hereto and have found this document to be in compliance with the resolution adopted on September 12. 1979 by the Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission approving said change in organization or reorganization. The name of the /City is: Cupertino The entire /City is located in Santa Clara County. The change of organization completed is an annexation A map and description of the boundaries of the change of organization is appended hereto. The title of this proceeding is: MONTA VISTA 79-2 The change of organization was ordered subject to the following terms and conditions: None The date of adoption of the resolution ordering the change of organization/ is October 29, 1979 Dated 11/30/79 AssistantExecuve fficer oSanta Clara my Local Agency Formation Commission 1 2d i [I [fl 17 IC 1-1 It 15 IA / f � i SANTA. CLARA. AVE j P.t Oc n, t.ot 11v Y�lA 1�ISTh 1 t �- �� I 2 9 4. ., 6 7 8 9 10 I I 12 I le IS IE 11 J1 PLNII`61l VA bL.V'►1 ��� rl:to cr,.r.,.r.•..1 rlu�>'.Ic e.r e.r L'h ililf: l- LI O ^,LIH,AM FORA A;'E 26 24 23 ! 31 Y 28 2 2 5 a ; j as z{to 15 rhs si, i s° Lij / 33 i mm "wdw arhw:wMawsw.vycrt.cwawmo:rv+w.vuay.u=ww�uat.urwai.+n.+„.m_�raut+x�-i rS+�uauuaE%wat...ex:+rw'.4wr.o..mwdW°+,.ss.Axr..ace+n.+.�+.�a+,r3+.ueaa�.wwaw'+.ru+.srw,+w....r�..•caF.+�wa+.�+�+�.^n••'Yw.-+`.w Owl' OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR-SANTA LARK :0U-.TY,CALIF0RNIA Compiled in conformance w th Sec. 327 - 03H of she Kcvcnuc and 'Taxation Code Effective Date t-lar. 1 , 191" I1WiC}Cf' L. �111'THIISIEN' - ASSLSSOR 3 EMPIRE 23 AVE. cucarA 326 I 24 DEL�OL �� W 25 2S ,2; —25 25 25 25 25 2s ZS zs '.5 z5 2 a , / c J4 s 49 ik r a _ r 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 !7 ui 1 i 2 3 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 !! 12 13 14 15 16 { L2 p i m 46 18 1 16 3 �l t0 25 25 25 25 25 '_5 25 25 2'- 25 25 25 z5 25 io 72 7Y3G"2�`- SAN T A CLAP,A AVM. 25 BLOCK Nn j FQ zs ZS <:5 25 z5 25 25 25 -- 15 zs I25 ;::5 Z5 (0 1 21- -'. 22 23 24 �`25 w N } ` 7 + t t 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 i MOtvTA Jf S 1 A - _._ - - __ _ ! - z 1 ST ADDITION 0 .. - d 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ;! i2 13 14 15 16 (� 48 34•- 29 29 27 4 10 2s PENINSULA 20 BLVD. FE B 2 8 l`f'w.Cf if 45SESSOA :.A-NIA LAMA tMil-.'{ CA�FFORWIA COMPILE0 IN CONFORW k..�;(. w '^ SEC '2' OF THE R;VENUE A%Z 'ox=—Cti CCCE \ EFFECTIVE �AT[ WIG HT L MATHIttSEty L SESS(�R brax CARE 32Es I 25 23 `11\\ i `A v.. d UJ 35 3 22 -200 a x s - I ST A t— r b- O N up 32 e�o�r f4 to 11 � r S 5 .9 7. a STEVENS CREEK BLVb _ ' 14 r r4 4 a. BK �s �357� w —/ A _ JU�TY.ta�.,FC3rr'.� I t:vY nrl.[C 'M CQNiCP1iSVCE • 'N SEC W Ca TM[ R[v[t+c[ avC 'axaT:J» CGCE [rF[:.Tty( CAT'E ragc k 1, 978 to Cot Gh' _ MATHISEN ASSESSCR �z 6 ' O L.3 f cc WEST VALLEY FREEWAY C CK) a 50 ?3L. A, 22 4n1 W -- — b P.M. 411 - M - 42 s' ALHAM,BRA, AVE `0 Et, Al MONTA V STA 1 ST ADDt i 1ON 1 r v itil of Cuperti"o City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 252-4505 To: Members of the City Council From: Robert W. Meyers, Mayor Subject: RECOGNITION OF ANNEXATION AREA ENTITLED t•IONfA VISTA 79-`_' October 29, 1979 is an historic day for both the City of Cupertino and the unincorporated county area kn.-)wn pride`ully by its residents as 11onta vista. This date is Even more historic than the July 1, 1979 date of annexation of the former San Jose area into Cupertino, because it represents the approval date & - the annexa- tion of the area entitled Monta Vista 79-2 under the MORGA act. The reason that I feel this is so significant is that most of us can remember very vividly the opposition of just a few short years ago by many of these same Monta Vista residents to any annexation into Cupertino, which in fact culminated in efforts to form a separate city of Monta Vista. Fortunately , following the inability of the Monta Vista residents to form a City of Monta Vista, an attitude change on the part of Cupertino came forth to soothe the feelings and to bring more input from the residents into the planning for. the Monta Vis ca area. t I believe than due to involvement by the residents , not the least being citizens like ! Ann Anger who was always around to persuade us to consider the special circumstances and :feelings permeating Monta Vista, that a rapport has been established between C:pertin.o and hionta Vista w:itncssed by the petition of residents of Monta Vista 79-2 to become part of Cupertino one year ago. I have requested that this be an agenda item rather than part of the Cite Clerk's report so that you could join with me in officially recognizing this significant event, and to make note th.at cooperation is by far a better technique to find solutions Chan is confrontation. and to welcome all the new residents to the City of Cupertino. RI%FM: r.w s. KENNETH CORY Gt#raUtr of t4E State of Uifamin SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNIA 95805 (915) 322-5230 February 1, 1980 `rs. Dorothy Cornelius -itv Clerk 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Dear Pds. Cornelius: On February 1, 1980 , we Filed to your County Clerk or Registrar of Voters a request for certification cf the number of registered voters in the annexed territory described as "Monta Vista '1'9-2, Resolution No. 5149." A copy of the certification of completion for this annexation was filed with your County Rec irder on Noi ember 30, 1979. Under the provisions of Section 99 (b) of Chapter 282, Statutes of 1979 (AB 8), for other than a city incorporation or a formation of a district, the governing bodies of all agencies whose service areas or service responsibilities would be altered by such change shall ;'sleet tc determine the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged between and among such affected agencies. Section 99 (b) further provides that notwithstanding any other provision of law. no such jurisdictional nhange shall become effective until each county and city included in such negotiation agrees, by resolution, to accept the negotiated exchange of property tax revenues. Therefore, if you have not already done so, please send us copies of the resolutions adopted by your city and county regarding the negotiated exchange of property tax revenues for the above annexation. Also, please send this office a copy of the annexation ordinance if the City Council has set a date later than the effective date of the annexation as described in the following paragraph. The effective date of annexation of territory to a city is the date the executive officer of the local agency formation comission records a certified copy of the certification of completion with the recorder of the county in which the affected territory is located, the effective date fixed in the resolution orderir:q.., the annexation if one is provided, or the date of the resolu','J.ons adopted by the city council and county board of supervimors in which they agree to accept the negotiated exchange of property tax revenues, whichever date is the later. PAY-23 6v. 1/80) P. 1 -2- As provided in Section 11005 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the population of the above annexation will be determined by multiplying the number of registered electors therein, as certified to us by your County Registrar of Voters, by three. City population is used in the apportionment of cigarette taxes, highway users taxes, and motor vehicle license (fees ("in-lieu" tax). Sincerely, William S. Bierly, Chief Division of Accounting FAM-23 (Rev. 1/80) P. 2 t 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 (408)252-4505 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 42 . AGENDA DATE December 4. 1979 SUBJECT AND ISSUE - Retention. of Consultant for Storm Drain Design - Monta Vista Area BACKGROUND It is requested that authorization be granted to the staff to retain a consultant to design the storm drain facility for the Monta Vista area. This is required due to the spot development that is occurring within, the area which requires certain grade to be set for both street and pad elevations. With a design completed, development may occur utilizing the storm drain grades as the base to establish street and curb grades and allow buildings to be erected at es- tablished pad elevations. Without the design, the development could occur in a haphazard way which will result in poor drainage to the site and portions of street work will have to be deferred which may never be completed. It is therefore advisable that a master plan be developed, grades established, and street improvements implemented at the time of development and avoid deferred improvements as much as possible. The fees established in the master storm drain fee schedule already includes engineering design. The master plan will preclude the need of each development to hire its own engineer to do said work. The City would recover the design cost through the master storm drain fee to be collected from each development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the City Council authorize the staff to retain a consultant and the fee be expended from the master storm drain fund. BJV:sm Subm ted b Certified as to Approved for submission Availability of funds: to the City Council: i Be t J. Visk vic Di ector of ublic Works lame Sn der Robert W. Quinlan Y Finance Director City Manager ! I SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER —AGENDA DATE December 3, 1979 SUBJECT AND ISSUE - Policy Interpretation Regarding the Old Monta Vista General Plan. e joint City County Old Monta Vista General Plan contains hypothetical development plan for the downtown Monta Vista area and policies that pertain to the reconfiguration of Pasadena Avenue and Imperial Avenue to provide for perpendicular on-street parking spaces. The Old Monta Vista Plan does not identify which property owners would benefit by said on-street parking spaces, the degree to which said property owners would benefit and the method of implementation of the reconfigured streets. The purpose of the policy interpretation hearing is to resolve the above described issues. BACKGROUND The attached Planning Commission reports dated October 19, 1979 and November 9, 1979 detail the issues involved in the policy determination. After reviewing the matter during the two public hearings, the Planning Commission reaffirmed the concept of reconfiguring the two -streets to provide on-street parking and determined that the reconfigured design should provide for 60 degree parking spaces. The Planning Commission additionally determined that the property benefited by the off-street parking credit would be 'Limited to that which is bounded by Stevens Creek Boulevard, the Southern Pacific railroad tracks, Granada Avenue as extended to the railroad tracks, and a north/ south line dividing the business block between Orange Avenue and Pasadena Avenue. The Planning Commission determined that the best means of allocating parking space credit is based upon acreage which translates into on-street parking space allocation of 18 spaces per acre of land. That ratio assumes that a yield of 80 spaces will be derived by the final off-street parking design. 1TAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009 recommending City Council endorsement of the above-mentioned recommendations is attached. Since the primary issue involves the distribution of off-street parking credits and since the original project concept was evaluated by the Stevens Creek Boulevard Environmental Impact Report, a separate environmental assessment is not necessary. The staff recommended a 75 degree parking design in lieu of the 60-degree recommended by the Planning Commission. The 75 degree design will provide the ease of movement desired by the Commission with the 60- degree design and will provide marginal two directional movement into opposing stalls which is the chief advantage of a 90-degree plan. Enclosures Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009 Staff Reports of October 19, 1979 and November 9, 1979 Planning Commission, Minutes of October 22, 1979 Exhibits 86,003.3 o ' RESOLUTION NO. 2009 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO CLARIFYING PLAN MAPS AND POLICIES 01 THE OLD MONTA VISTA ELEMENT OF THE STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD PLAN LINE. Figure E of the subject plan is a hypothetical development plan for the commercial district of Old Monta Vista. The figure proposes perpendicular on•-street parking spaces for the reach of Pasadena an Imperial Avenues located between the cross-streets of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Granada Avenue. Policy 1 of Subgoal A and Policy l(d) of Subgoal B contains vague references to the need for a parking district to consolidate parking. The policies additionally describes the objective of minimizing traffic increases which may occur if substantial building area increases are permitted as a result of the credit of on-street parking. The purpose of this resolution is to clarify the map and written policies as follows: 1. All properties fronting on the segments of Pasadena and Imperial. Avenues designated for on-street parking by Figure E of the Old Monta Vista Plan shall be credited with a proportionate share of on-street parking spaces based upon net acreage. Based upon a predicted yield of 80 on-street spaces, the ratio results in a share equaling 18 on-street parking spaces for each each net acre. 2. The allowed building intensity for each property shall be based upon the availability of off-street parking spaces as required by the City of Cupertino zoning ordinance; the application of the 18 on-street parking spaces/net acre rule described above; and by the architectural and site design criteria contained in the Old Monta Vista Plan. 3. The street section for the subject reach of Imperial and Pasadena Avenues shall be configured for 60-degree angled parking. The cross- section is described below: i d 32'�'� 70 4. The City shall retain an engineering consultant to prepare a storm drainage plan for Imperial and Pasadena Avenues which will assist privately retained engineers to design the street plan. The City shall additionally promote the creation of a local improvement district to complete street improvements as a single project. -1- 86,003.3 w RESOLUTION NO. 2009 PASSED :VND ADOPTED this 13th day of Nrvember, 1=179, at a regular meeting of the Plan.•iing Commission of the City of Cupertino, St=to of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Adams, Blaine, Claudy, Chairman Gatto NAYS: Commissioner Koenitzer ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None APPROVED: /s/ John M. Gatto John M. Gatto, Chairman Planning Commission ATTEST: RA�Cmla%- Robert Cowan Assistant Planning Director -2- a•.sue:: ON Of CuPelll * City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, Coiitornio 95014 (408) 252-4505 To: The HonorrLble Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Robert Cowan, Assistant Planning Director DATE: October 19, 1979 SuDiett: Clarification of Old Monta Vista Plan Pertaining to Land Use and Urban. Design Principles The Old Monta Vista Plan provides for the conversion of portions of ImF rial and Pasadena Avenues from a 70 ft. wide industrial. street cross-section to a revised section that incorporates perpendicular parking and limited through vehicular access. The intent of the Plan is to provide an organized parking scheme which accommodates a highly :ragmented ownership pattern. Additionally, the parking lots and accompanying sidewalks and landscaping will provide a functional and visual link between properties. The Old Monta Vista Plan does not contain detailed information regarding the perpendicular parking plan other than to state that increased parking should not permit a building area to land area ratio for the Monta Vista commercial area to be increased beyond 35%. The 35% factor relates to the potential for increased traffic. An additional policy discusses the use of a parking district to implement the off-street prking plan_ The policy makes it clear that the district should not substantially increase the overall intensity of the comtz.:rcial development thereby creating higher levels of traffic. The purpose of this memorandum is to clarify the Old Monta Vista Plan relative to the implications of implementing the perpendicular parking configuration of Pasadena and Imoe rial Avenue. The clarification requires answers to three questions listed below: 1. If parking credit is transferred to owners, how will building intensity be monitored from the point of view of traffic generation? 2. How will parking spaces be credited to individual owners? 3. How will the street improvements including parking stabs be installed and %rho will pay for it? Ouestion 1: Intensity Policy 1 of Subgoal A and Policy ld of Subgoal B are intended to ensure that the reconfig- uration of Pasadena and Imperial Avenues will not result in the over intensification of development which results in traffic increases. Don Goodrich, the City's Traffic Consultant for the Old Monta Vista Plan assigned a trip generation factor of 600 ADT trip ends per acre and 150 ADT trip ends per acre for undeveloped land in the commercial and store front industrial section of the Plan located southerly of Stevens Creek Boulevard. It is, therefore, possible for the Citv co adopt a trip end per acre constraint that coule be applied to individual development proposals. For example, eac'. parcel in a commercial or store front industrial planning area could be allocated its pro rata share of 600 ADT's per acre and future development proposals could be assigned trios based upon established trip generation factors or by special study. Table 1 identifies common all day trip end per acre factor utilized for three land use types. Table 2 is an example of a trip generation analysis prepared for Application 2 -U-79 which is considered for review by the Planning Commission following the clarification of the -1- l ' s Clarification of Old Wonta Vista Plan Pertaining to Land 'se and Urban Design Principles October 19, 1979 issues raised in this memorandum. As indicated by Table 2, the applicant in this case would generate traffic well beljw the generation factor used by :sir. Goodrich. Table 1 Retail Commercial 40 trip ends per acre Office 20 trip ends per acre Industrial 10 trip ends per acre Table 2 Traffic Generation Analysis Example for Application 24-U-79 Trips assigned to site: 600 trips/acre j.288 acres = 137 trips Trips generated by future uses: Commercial: 1,400 sq. ft. x 40 ADT/1000 sq. ft. = 56 Industrial.: 3,300 sq. ft. x 10 ADT/1000 sq. ft. = 33 Total C-eneration = 89 trips Another approach to regulating intensity is to control building square footage through the use of the off-street parking ordinance. The development intens .ty in all conventional, commercial, office, and industrial Zones in town is in fact regulated by off-street parking requirements. For example, in the strip commercial areas, the normal building square footage to land area ratio is 25%. Staff favors the second approach based upon its simplicity and the fact that given the limited area involved, a traffic generation constraint is not warranted. Allocation of Parkin Spaces to Owners Conservatively, approximately 80 spaces will be generated by the conversion of the subject sections of Pasadena and Imperial Avenues. The 80 stall estimate is based upon assumptions involving existing and projected curb cuts and landscaping space. Figure A which is attached to this report identifies the properties that are master planned for strict commercial or store front industrial. The square footage and acreage is listed for each ownership within the various blocks and sub-blocks. The purpose of this segment of the report ;s to provide a staff recommendation as to how the 80 parking spaces will be allocated to th— owners. Table 3 describes three scenarios for distributing the 80 spaces based upon acreage. Table 3 1. Benefit to properties in Blocks 1, 2, and 3. 80 _ 4.41 acres - 18 spaces per acre. (Properties fronting parking lots) . 2. Benefit to properties in Blocks 1, 2, 3a and 3b. 80 T 5.57 = 14.3 spaces per acre (Properties north Granada) . 3. Benefit to properties in Block 1, 2, 3a, 3b, and south of Granada. 80 _ 6.84 = 11.7 spaces per acre. (All commercial and store front industrial properties) . -2- Clarification of Old Monta Vista Plan Pertaining to Land Use and Urban Design Principles October 1- 9, 1979 It may be argued that factors other than acreage such as street frontage could be used to determine the space allocation. In staff's judgment, the acreage factor is most eauitabie. Staff recommends that the first scenario for space allocation be adopted. The recommendation is based upon a finding that the properties that are adjacent to the subject parking lot configured streets will most likely be solely responsible for improvement of said streets. Secondly, since the allocation of parking spaces of property allows slightly greater building intensity,, it makes more sense to limit the intensity within the blocks adjacent to residential areas. Implementation The reconstruction of Imperial Avenue to the parking lot configuration can be accomplished through two general approaches. The first involves the use of a local improvement district. The second involves an incremental approach keyed to major developments. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach will be discussed on October 22, 1979 with the aid of graphic materials. Enclosure: Figure A -3- e ice= C)Yil of C"Ve!'ti"o C;tu of ° jpertino 10300 Torre avenue Cjoertino, Coiifornio 95014 (408) 252-4505 To: -�t1^- Sono-:able Chairman and uembers or the ?lane n2 Commission. From: Robert 1:owan, Assistant Planning D4.rector DATE: November °, 1?79 Subject: Continued Public Hearing Pertaining to the Clarification of Land Use Policies involving the Old Monta Vista General Plan The continued public hearing involves a review of the on-street parking plan for the reach of Imperial and Pasadena Avenues located between the cross streets of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Granada within the Old Monta Vista commercial district. The adopted `?or_ta Vista Plan contains a hypothetical development plan for the commercial istrict which incorporates perpendicular on-street parking spaces for the aforementioned streets. The hearing was scheduled by staff for the pur-pose of clarifying the issue of who benefits by the use of on-street parking spaces and what degree would the commercial district be over intensified in terms of traffic if certain owners are credited for the on-street parking spaces.. At the conclusion of the October 22, 1979 hearing, the Planning Commission determined that additional information was needed rerarra_-.:5 the park.inSZ design_ concept itself prior to making decisions involving traffic intensity and the credit of on- street parking spaces. Therefore, the hearing was continued to the meeting of November 13, 1979. The on-street parking issue must be evaluated in terms of aesthetics and efficiency which eventually evolves into the broader issue of economics . The added width of the street cross-section (70 fc . versus 60 ft.) offers the City and affected property owners design flexibility. In essence, there are two fundamental options : Option 1 - The reconfiguration of streets into perpendicular or angle parking stalls and Option 2 - a conventional street section with parallel parking. Option 2 entails the abandonment of a portion_ of the right of way to adjoining property owners . a brief written and graphic description of each alternative follows : _?tion 1: 90 Degree or Angled Parking within a 70 ft. Right of Way Informational exhibit labeled Option A identifies the design concept for a 90 degree option. As evidenced by the adjoining cross-section, the proposal is to construct a crowned road bed for the traffic aisle between the stalls with the parl•ing spaces to be sloped down from the sidewalks to provide positive drainage. The positive drainage feature is necessary to allow the installation of landscaping pockets that extend perpendicularly from the sidewalk. The informational exhibit for Option A describes a worse case situation in terms of the effect of driveway locations on the parking space yield. The drawing assumes that the DeGrange application will be pursued. The design would result in a yield of approximately 57 spaces. • i. 32' 19 ° V -70J-O` -i - Cont-ailed ?ubiic Hearing Pertaining to the Clarification of Land Use olicies involving the Old Monta Vista General Plan November 9 , 1979 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oot`on Z Informational exhibit labeled Option B describes a conventional 40 ft. pavement section within a 60 ft . right of way. As .indicated by the cross-section, the '.,- tt. pavement allows two parking lanes, two travel lanes and two 5 ft. monolithic sidewalks. The total construction cross-section, including sidewalks, will be 50 ft. it would be possible to abandon approximately 10 ft. of space on either side of sidewalk back to adjoining owners (assuming no utility easements) . under Option B, it is assumed that the need to break up the parking expanse with planters is not required. Therfore, the deletion of planting areas would increase the Potential yield for parallel spaces. :gain, assuming that no planting areas are instalird and assuming that the same curb cuts would be maintained as Option A, the yield would be approximately 43 parking spaces. 10 N i 70 Design Evaluation In the staff's judgment, the 90 degree or 75 degree parking configuration is superior because of the greater parking yield, its' tendency to proviae a greater incentive for development, and 'because it creates the possibility of creating a unifying design link between developments on opposite side of the streets and thus help to promote a coordinating shopping district for the Old Monta Vista. The disadvantage of the perpendicular or slightly angled parking configuration is that it is more difficult to implement because of the large number of property owners . This factor is particularly true near the intersection of Pasadena and Granada avenue where there are two or three occupied residential buildings . Credit of Parking Spaces and Building Intensity Building upon the recommendation that the perpendicular or 75 degree stall configuration be approved, the staff further reaffirms its earlier position that property owners directly fronting on the affected reaches of Pasadena and Imperial be credited on- street parking spaces based upon a ratio of net acreage to the projected number of parking spaces. The resultant ratio of net acreage to the projected number of per acre. The previously submitted staff report of October 10 , 1979 describes the methodology for allocating parking spaces and the staff rationale for the area of benefit. The question of increase in building intensity and resultant increase in traffic Continued Public hearing Pertaining to the Clarification of ' Land Use Policies involving the Old Monta Vista General ?!an November 9, 1979 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ generation was discussed during the October 22, 1979 meeting. As _10u may recall, staff recommended that a new elaborate trip accounting procedure not be established to regulate intensity that may be slightly increased as the result of allocating on-street parking spaces. Staff estimates that crediting of 80 spaces to the 4.4 acres benefited by the allocation system would result in an increase in the theoretical building to land intensity ratio from 25% to 35%. The mathematical computation suppo--ting this assumption is contained below: Typical flocr area ratio = 4.41 acres x 25% = 1.1 acres or 48,025 sc. ft. Additional building square footage permitted by 80 spaces = 80 x 230 sq. ft. = 18,400 sq . ft Total building square footage = 48,025 + 18,400 = 62,425 sq. ft. The new land area to floor ratio = 62,425 sq. ft. t 192,099 sq, ft. = 35%. Recommendation It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution which is designed to clarify the policy intent of the Old Monta Vista Plan. The Public Works staff is preparing a report to City Council containing a recommendation that funds be allocated to obtain a consultant to design the storm system for the affected reaches of Pasadena and Imperial. The storm line plan will assist private developers in the preparation of a more detailed street design plan should the improve- ments be installed on an incremental basis . The ideal approach, and one that will be pursued by staff, is the establishment of a local improvement district to plan and install all improvements concurrently. Enclosures : Rec-mmended Resolution On-Street Parking Plans - Options A and B Submitted for :approval, awes N. Sisk lanning Director -3- MINUTES OCTOBER 22 , 1979 REGULAR PTANNING COMMISSION `1EETI_•IG PC-320 E Page _3 MOTION : Com. Koenitzer , recommend approval of 27-U-79 , I�I Standard Conditions #1 through #14 ; #13 through i -� F19 as per Staff Memo with the Findings and sub- �'conclusions presented therein . Seed : Com. Adams VOTE : AYES : --,Com. Claudy , Adams , Koenitzer , Blaine NO : C Gatto CHR, GATTO wished the Rceord show.-that his "No" vote was simply a preference for Configuration A instead of C . MINUTE ORDER TO COUNICZL:Request t�at� the abandoned portion of Mann Drive have the pavement removed , old curb cuts be taken out and new c,u-rb cuts be installs. MOTION : Com. Koenitzer . Second : ���m. Adams VOTE: AYES : Com. Adams , Gatto , Koenitzer , ,3aine . NO,.-` Com . Claudy COM. C�.AUDY stated that his ..o vote reflected his o, nip tha property owners should be required to make on-site pravements . ITEM #6 , CITY OF CUPERTINO : PUBLIC HEr?RI'NG to clar `T ian� use policies contained within t-e Ole? '21onta Vista "zneral Plan, particularly with respect to the practice of ier- mitting on-street parking to satisfy off-street Sar in >, needs and L_;'.'I't0'_.1 1ENTAL REVIEW : The project was previous assessed hence no action is required . First Hearing . Tentative City Council hearing, date - November 19 , .assistant :lanning Director CoT an reninde,? the C^-• ^:c ' . � - e tr_.=.t " :,rota =sta Plan Had. �-aan decided as - ar-cendlcula park.-n^ treatment For a .apt cn n � imnerial and Pasadena enues for some fragmenta.;_ lots ; the interns t of, the parking having increased the traffic-bearing capacity of the streets . Referencing the Staff Report of October 19 , - he reminded the Commissioners that credit to individual property owners was suggested as one alternative ; and increase of allocation on on-the-street parking spaces was another alternative . The ratio of allocation needed settling, whichever alternative was adopted . The right-of- way width needed to be determined , and the mode of parking (angled , straight , or curb side) needed to be settled . He outlined , briefly , the problems concentrated on each of the modes of parking . He said the Staff felt the owners at the front should receive allocation of parking , and additional parking be allocated on the basis of acerage , (18 spaces would be available/acre of land) . A further recommendation was that a local assessment .district arrang - ment might be worthwhile developing . Otherwise , the parkin would be installed on an incremental basis , or on a de- ferred development-agreement basis . The ownership pattern being highly fragmented , with little hope of consolidation , it appeared to be that a series of curb cuts had to occur on the street otherwise . i MINUTES OCTOBER 22 , 1979 REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEET13G ?C-320 J ?age 15 Assistant City Engineer Whitten pointed out that the exist �ng parking on the specific property in question was already od the right-of-way . Mr . Michael Lynch , developer , who wished to develop immed- iately , said that regarding the parking , he preferred the vertical because it was possible to turn either way . Due to the complexity of the problem, the Commissioners felt they could not make definitive decisions with re- liability and felt the matter should be continued pending receiving more specific information . COM. GATTO felt that the chances of development through combined effort was small , and he :elt a development would occur spottily as need for use arose . He suggested they concentrate on establishing a thread as a unifying theme for the area. COM. CLAUDY offered the option of giving a bonus to any property owner putting together a package of specific size (10M or 20M sq . ft . ) by consolidating -- they 'd get the credit . Thus , consolidation of properties could be en- couraged and fragmentation could to some extent be avoided CHR. GATTO asked Staff if they would be able to get specif c information back ana it was agreed that three weeks would be reasonable -- November 13 , 1979 . MOTION : Com. Adams , to continue ITEM #6 to November 13 , ' 9 . Second : Com . Claudy VOTE : PASSED - UNANIMOUSLY 5-0 I �. 7 , Applications 20-Z-79 and 24-U-79 of ALLEN DEGRANG : REZON G approximately . 3 of a gross acre from ML (L fight Industr 1) to P (Planned Development with commercial and industria intent) zone or whatever zone may be;d'eemed appropriate the Planning Commission; USE PJFR`MIT to con- struct a 6 ,000 q . ft . commercial and industrial building and ENVIRONMENTA�• REVIEW: The Environmen.t'al Review Com- mittee recommends t e granting of a Negative Declaration . Said property is loca d on the east/'side of Imperial Avenue approximately 12 ft . southerly of Stevens Creek Boulevard . First Hearing ntinwued . Tentative City Council hearing date - November 19 , 9 . Assistant Planning Director Cowan concluded a review of th Staff Report by askingthat the approval of rezoning and use permit be granted . He said the basic issue was the store-front comme•fcial related to back-61-site industrial activity . In kfis case -- back site used for plumbing supply materials . Site plans were exhibitid' and the var- ious prob,kems to-ated . Mr . A,Zlen DeGrange , architect representing Mr . Lynch , said ` 5,' Lynch ' s being forced out of his present location made .time very important and a decision was needed . 41b Aaner 1�s+Aatbn peon (',panty isdminlatrstlon building -. g �aR w ?0 Wtat M dlding Strv3at, County Santa Area Ca4e £s ltfomla TOp Clerk, City of Cupertino FROM: Local agency Formation Commission DATE: November 30, 1979 SUBJECT: MONTA VISTA 79-2 This is to advise that documents associated with the above change of organization have been found to be in order and the necessary filings have been made with the County Recorder, State Board of Equalization and County Assessor. as required by law. Enclosed is an endorsed copy of the Certificate of completion which was recorded with the County Recorder on November 30, 1979 If the above chance of organization included detachment from a fire district, it is required by law that detachm nt must be effected within one year ho ever, completion of the detac nt by January lot will prevent the roperty being taxed by b h the City and the fire district. ou are refore, encourage to complete the detachment by this date. After the territory has been detached from please complete and return the form below. (Fire District) Thank you, Paul E. Sagers Assistant Executive Officer -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local Agency Formation Commission 70 nest Redding Street, East Wing, loth F oor San Jose, California 95110 ,r rrr Detachment of from -- (Annexation (Fire District) has been camp t by the City of on (date) S gnature LAFC-50 An B� OpO�w �� Citil ®f C61 ertfmio 10300 Torre Avenue i;upertino, California 95014 Telephone (408) 252-4505 ilovember 27, 1979 Local tc ency Porination CoTm-tission 1555 Beis:er Drive Building 2, Room 207 San Jose, CA 95112 Attn: Anna Lerisian JNNM~ ATZON - "MONTA VISTA 79-2" Enclosed is the City's warra::t- in the amount of $95.00 for completion of tote "Morita Vista 79-2" island annexation. Please make effective December 1, 1979. Sincerely , DOROTHY CORNELIUS CITY CLERK tea encl. Local Agency ftrmatlon Commission County Administration Build ng 70 West Hedding Street, East wing County of Santa Clara San Jose, AreaCalifornia e 408 299-3191Area Code aoe California EXECUTIVE OFFICER°S CERTIFICATE OF FILING QF RESQLU3:2QN QF A P .T _ATTQN The undersigned certifies as follows: I am the duly selected and acting Executive Officer of the Santa Clara County Lud®l Agency Formation Commission. A resolution entitled, " A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE ISLAND DESIGNATED "MONTA VISTA 79 " and designated as MONTA VISTA 79-2 was filed with me on ;T_ „�16 , 19 79 - Said resolution has been duly adopted by the legislative body of the City of Cupertino which is an affected y/city/ dust 4iot, as defined in applicable law. Pursuant to Sections 35140-35141/ inclusive, Government Code, I have examined the resolution and find these documents to contain all the information and data requested by the Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission. Based upon such examination, it is HEREBY DETERMINED AND CERTIFIED that this resolution of application s hereby being certified for filing on the date shown below. This resolution will be considered at the September. 22 , 19 79 meeting of the Local Agency Formation Commission. Dated; August 14, 19-/9 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION WILLIAM M. SIEGEL, Executive Officer Paul E. Sagers ' —��� Assistant Executive Officer 78-7c Resolution of Application Citst ®f Cuperti"o 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 Telephone (408) 252-4505 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES June 20, 1979 Local Agency Formation Commission 1555 Berger Drive Building 2, Room 207 San Jose, CA 95112 Attention: Paul E. Sagers RE: "MONTA VISTA 79-2" ISLAND ANNEXATION In accordance with the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 the Cupertino City Council, at its regular meeting of June 18, 1979, adopted a resolution to initiate island annexation of the area designated "Monta Vista 79-2". On November 9, 1978 four petitions signed by a total of twenty persons were turned in to City offices. These petitions requested that Cupertino annex an island in the Monta Vista area located westerly of Freeway 85, southerly of University Avenue, easterly of Peninsula Avenue and northerly of Stevens Creek Boulevard. The territory consists of approximately 23 acres, 70 dwellings and 214 persons. Upon submission of the petitions Council directed staff to prepare a Master Plan for Services for Proposed Island Annexations, which was approved March 19, 1979. Council also requested preparation of. a Site Specific Plan based on this Master Plan. The Site Specific Plan describes how services will be provided to the island designated "Monta Vista 79-2". A public meeting was held in Cupertino City Hall on Tuesday, March 27 to review with residents and property owners the Plan for the proposed island annexation area. Notices of the meeting were mailed to all property owners and residents within the affected area. Persons were invited to review both the Master Plan for Services and the Site Specific Plan prior to the meeting in order to formulate questions they ma} wish to ask. Each person attending the meeting received a copy of the Master Plan and Site Specific Plan. No objections to either were expressed. There was overall support for the proposed annexation and questions pertained to how each individual would benefit. LOCAL AGENCY: FORMATION COMMISSION -2- JUNE 20, 1979 Council adopted the Site Specific Plan for "Monta Vista ?9-2" at their meeting of April 16, 1979. On May 14, 1979 the Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing for prezoning of the island. This was referred to Council for public hearing at their meeting of June 4. On June 18 Council enacted Ordinance No. 933 prezoni.ng the area. On June 18, Council also conducted a noticed public hearing in order to enable residents and property owners of the island an additional opportunity to ask questions or to protest the proposed annexation. No protests were made. Copies of the following documents are enclosed for LAFCO approval or informa- tion. 1) Master Plan for Services for Proposed Island Annexations 2) Site Specific Plan for "Monta Vista 79-2" 3) Ordinance No. 933, Prezoning the island (certified) 4) Resolution No. 5030 initiating annexation proceedings pursuant to MORGA (certified) 5) List of property owners and registered voters of the area 6) Petitions submitted by residents which initiated Council action. If you have any questions or any other documentation is necessary please contact me. CITY OF CUPERTINO Dorothy Cornelius City Clerk cm encs. _ n SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 22 AGENDA DATE June 18. 1979 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Consideration of island annexation "Monta Vista 79-2" BACKGROUND The enactment of the 1Iunicipal Organization Act of 1977 (WRGA) gave cities the ability to initiate annexation proceedings for island areas under certain specified conditions. 1. The territory to be annexed does not exceed 100 acres in its entirety; it is surrounded or substantially surrounded by the City; it is substantially developed or r+Qveloping; it is not prime agricultural land; it will benefit :from annexation or s already receiving benefits from the annexing city. 2. The City shall prepare a plan for providing serv.ces to the area proposed to be annexed. On November. 9, 1978 four: petitions signed by a total of twenty persons were turned in to City offices. These petitions requested that Cupertino annex an island in the Monta Vista area lccated westerly of. Freeway 85, southerly of University Avenue, easterly of Peninsula itvenue and northerly of Stevens Creek Boulevard. The territory consists of approximately 23 acres, 70 dwellings and 214 persons. Upon submission of the petitions Council directed staff to prepare a ;`faster Plan for Services for Proposed Island Annexations, which was approved March 19, 1979. Council. also requested preparation of a Site Specific Plan based on this Plaster Plan. The Site Specific Plan describes how services will be provided to the :island designated "Nonta Visl:3. 79-2". A public meeting was held in. Cupertino City Hall on Tuesday, itarch 2/ to review with residents and property owners the Plan for the proposed island annexation area. Notices of the meeting were mailed ro all property owners and resiients within the affected area. Persons were invited to review both the Master Plan for Services and the Site Specific Plan prior to the meeting in order to formulate questions they may wish to ask. Each person attending the meeting received a cop} of the Master Plan and Site Specific Plan. No objections to either were expressed. There was overall support for the proposed annexation and questions pertained to how each individual. would bcc'cr.fit. Council. adopted the Site Specific plan for "Morita Vista 79-2" at their meeting of i\pri 1. 16, 1.979. CONSIDERATION OF ISLAND AREYATION PACE 2 "MONTA VISTA 79-2" .AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 22 BACKGROUND (Cont.) Following LAFCO requirements, on Ma;, 14, 1979 the 'Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing for prezoning of the island. This was referred to Council for public hearing at their meeting of June 4. At that time Council conducted the hearing and the prezoning ordinance was given its first reading. That ordinance (Ordinance No. 933) is scheduled for enactment this evening. Prezoning the area and adopting the attached resolution of initiation of proceed- ings (Resolution No. 5030) would complete necessary actions to be taken by the City Council. The resolution, prezoning information, Master Plan .for Services, Site Specific Plan for Services, a list of property owners and registered voters would then be submitted to LAFCO. LAFCO, upon acceptance of the above, would conduct a noticed public hearing and deny or approve the island annexation. LAFCO denial terminates the proceedings and application may not be resubmitted :for one (1) year without LAFCO consent. Should LAFCO approve, a resolution is adopted and the Board of Supervisors is directed to initiate proceedings as conducting authority. They, too, conduct a public hearing. The Board of Supervisors may adopt a resolution ordering island annexation without an election; protest and election provisions do not apply. Proceedings terminate if the Board of Supervisors disapprove the annexation. However, should the Board approve, completion of annexation is carried out by 1.AFCO. This consists of recordation of a Certificate of Completion of Proceedings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Initiate annexation proceedings for "Monta "vista 79-2" by adoption of Resolution No. 5030. APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO THE CITY COUNCIL Robert W. Quinlan. City Manager DC:cm r 0 ' 1 tiE C.iTy MlAi;hvi:fi L9/2 ..>O ;=,tmcy ,''Ol"i:\.ii:.:LGit. l:�i:x17\i55iOi2 7J tieddii:g Street. S-1 .. OSe, Ca1.i.1Grni.a 9511.0 .:.-t�:::_i.t 71UN S .%i� Ti' ON`A Vli.S?i'. AREA ili Yi$1 Onsc t0 your ictti'i: OL lay 1.1, .L would ,Lixi to L:i lur'Llia Lite past LWG yeaj'Ex t,2E' CjA:Y Of CUPil:C:LZ;U, i1.i.Z5 succes-sfu Ll'r involved ii.uz-n cubs r.+.iiii::.CS GT �,.r; ij., .:iCG' V.LSi::1 i7CF'_a 1.i1 St'ti.l 10 `','Oii.9c:i::G p:i0._Lt_3Gti 1J.. i=C:c i.iiLli::c ii1.1'\',ji:�iJ::, i•. � lC C v. iL Las bec,I, tile. Ci t�y IS inte,n i.., y J.,RVO V-LIRL�, 1c_61 C.-e i.S i:i:Ol'- tii;ll.IZtir ar-'aa, CO iVe tile.11 C1iYE:C�i: i.7-1puC 171 i?CUi1i1CZC:Litc� )C .2C,i =U 1.2 i L,}' couiZC11_ COCiceril t.lb i CLLers wl)ii: l Ul irate' Wi G1Y L y u . 2GL to '1Tery Cuch a'>?a.re of '_'Cle ai.:tion. za',,-.en 1:'i;y' the 1.00ai A;t'.nci,; YCfzl.it. t1.i.� ti2i; l.it`\f Of ClipClLiilO CU wOYK +`lS ta, c:Lrea in Ord,2r tiia.` a. r:OYe uieariitlgfu I , CUxi.:pr t0 6ili11.2:ir1t 1.Ji: CGI :ila area. xxaS Jet'_il our opinion anion ;.Y'Oill till_ SJi'_g11 fn— of thi2 Cut)- 1:1 . ". ..x1VGlVi_'ia211t. of Lxx :Si:' -Si6el1i:.S would sure t.nen' of ":12 O;: Cuportiln. LG !"1c1:i:11C c..l_i_.L'LC-l'S ..YGiil i:'2 if ia•l`_C.i.. ].7 ipU,% LG the Jeciuicr,,;,mking UrGCet;5 OI ti7d 1., ,ty. e _ .. � ....i\i_ �i.i'ii Vi3L�� ..dC✓u.L�x�il� i1S related %O ;:Ile U_Li.ii.n.�H bU:i_,. Gi t_::1.,... i.:i-:.ail Ci71:(iOr at E'er al'L?u. d.S Mu.V ._.), t.,.LL}` -Staff :ii C:r'l)._'::3 i-"et wiCli, a t..4 Lx_,a.,..'t lU i".. Oiile.OW Ii<'.CS C,:4.i i_ i.(.)12 %O U..i.SCUSa CSC.! Ul.. s�il.;_t •.xx�1^.111. U:i the. ilYey Z;.. it 1.; oU ., tJ.:. <a..i 'Vi!lV\�Q. N'01. .,..'d u...xii1, is l;Lti Wi1.1. lid EI iu ile fziLi_u v'Ic"n [idle}:al-iCi',1. uZ Si,.alidl' Jarcolli Ll,iOn, i>.0 is\' ;OUli.lc,:ipal. water. Val. Lill. li.L•_7 J_.a.l4j V.c. .t.li.l.y i'.u.,.�..... j�� 'i-L... l.'..axC.l:] �4i�4.a. �ccx.u:OL 7C't' ti1:.5 1'1.iz•..i..cu 6 �'LtC i}_ i.:. -,c...a i..x��al ,...,. .i C... -: k2 1......a...c....c.. ua.. _.. lJ Ll l_ .L C.u.i.t <:.,.5'iiil. �.-11:J 1.r'1.c:1. ...it' C+i-.�.3 V.L is It.�L.= iti .a tltl: ciLiz Zc's of of ..t. .;.!aii7_:.abili? :.�vi`. Ol; De fie'.l is l co A/,Du if 1 cz::. Dc o a Z1. - ..... i-ssistance, pleabl Co:7tact 1 czo:,`Xf W. QUINL VN CC: City Council Stag Merlbers 972 R&oor�L W. Qu- G--E 0 rre Avenue t 21 S-L,�D e c Annexatioy,-S in lChe Y.onta Vista KC. Q'i-,iiilan; a.-d app-,:oving Cul.),:�Zzanols Local Agenc�.;, For:c;at-Lon Conctn,Isslon cfav ��-chwc a-,- pa irk amiexai�ion c);a-tern IIIEIS Oclz:,L,-- C; -L-- V1sta area. -L c n go SOICIe- d,st--anc�, dcwY -. a street -r-(D Picl�, i:,p a L ec,-e a se-rio"s ro is c c t l ain'L �:Lre anc. sewer servlc s aze noc r o,,ation, Hoviever, file Con-Lri-,-Lssicn did aci� to a-- n 6 iding at the tnat the Monll-,a Vis"ta Ir-corporati-on, ti, -v o' woui(: Work With 2%,on-1-a Vis a t-, .—a e Cit� 4- 0 p.-.-c'Pare, a plan 'f::or orcde:--J.y a"evelop-mcant- ar,'A' Of E).K,3 a comn,iissiw-1 wo.,:,ld like t--he, City of De -7 it e Cp CD rs-�-I.a S "D 7 a CdA--�I C, - J- -"..e i a l.. S S 4- L.a,:,1. -t o devel' op larger --'hEt v -em su ch as 2Aicazar 71-2 . c'�crr- s 'Ic-jz- ru I v yoars !1,0 C:L 1; A G .�,-.L cr a v 1 in a, C h a i rf,,i a.,i J j Out of Cupert4"o 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, Caiiiornia 95014 408)252-4505 TO: R. W. Quinlan, City Manager Bert Viskovich, Director, Dept. of Public Works DATE: May 9 1979 James Sisk, Director, Dept. of Planning y FR0wi' Dorothy Cornelius, City Clerk �v SU5JEC'T: ISLE-,, ANNEXATION "MONTA VISTA 79-2 ' Please add the following assessor parcel numbers t-) the legal description at the back of the Site Specific Service Plan for the island annexation "Monta Vista 79-2". APN 326-26-24, 25, 26 These parcels are part of the annexation but were inadvertently omitted from the legal. cm ! n- SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER— 32 ._AGENDA DATE_ April 16, 1979 — SUBJECT AND ISSUE Final consideration of the Site Specific Plan for "Morita Vista 79-2". BACKGROUND A public meeting was held in Cupertino City Hall on. Tuesday, March 27 to review with residents and property owners the Site Specific Plan .for proposed island annexation "Monta Vista 79-211. Notices of th.e meeting were mailed to all property owners and residents within the affected area. Persons were invited to review both the Master Plan for Services and the Site Specific Plan prior to the meeting in order to formulate questions they may wish to ask. Approximately four people came In to review the Plans and two individuals phoned the Clerk's Office to ask questions. Seven residents and/or property owners attended the public meeting. There was ov- -all support for the proposed annexation and questions expressed pertained to how each individual would benefit :from annexation. Each person attending received a copy of the Master Plan and Site Specific Plan. No objections x-sere made nor changes requested for either document. The City Clerk"s Office has received no citizen input subsequent to the public meeting. STAFF RE�OMMENDATIOPi As Council has previously reviewed the "Morita Vista 79-2" Site Specific Plan with. no request :for revisions, and affected persons within the area of: thy- proposed island annexation, have requested no changes, staff recommends the proposed Plan be adopted as submitted. AP13ROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO THE CITY COUNCTI,: Robert W. Quinlan, Cite `tanager. C Iil attachment AGENDA ITEM 30 SUMMARY Y try Ulr•, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 30 — AGENDA DATE March 19, 1979 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Review of Plaster Plan for Services for island annexations and Site Specific Plan. for proposed Monta Vista annexation. BACKGROUND As part of the island annexation procedures the Local Agency Formation. Commission (LAFCO) requires each city to prepare a Master Plan for Services (MPS) . Council has expressed the philosophy of not requiring municipal improvements in islands that might be annexed. Wlith this in mind staff has prepared the MPS according to LAFCO guidelines. The Master Plan for Services is a consolidation of service criteria, policies, capital improvement programs and funding mechanisms for all services provided in a city . The. MPS contains this information in the following areas: Fire Protection Police Protection. Library Services Parks and Recrearion Streets and Transportation Street Sweeping Water Supply Garbage Collection. Sanitary Sewer Storm Drains Flood Control. Street Lighting Land Use Regulation. LAFCO also requires that a Site Specific Plan be prepared for each island . This pla!i should reflect the guidelines of the MPS and is to be reviewed b , the island residents at a. public meeting. Staff has prepared a Site. Speci_Eic Plan for the pro- posed island annexation of a portion of Monta Vista. The public meet:inb to presenc the plan to rc!sidents has been scheduled for March 27, 1.979. At that time, interested persons may ask questions and express their feelings and attitudes toward all aspects of the proposed plan. (ioth the MPS and. Site Specific Plan are presented to Council at this time for review and comments. I'he Site Spec-ific Plan will be presented for approva following the public meeting w th island residents . At this time the. TIPS may be reviewed and revisions presented to staff; it maa' be rejected as presented with direction given for a flew <7ppraach, 0r :it may be cdopted with revisions or. a, presented . F STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council review the Master Plan for Services and ldopt as presented or with revisions. Staff will present the Site Specific Plan for approval after the public meeting with island residAnts . DC:rw APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO THE CITY COUN-dL: Robert W. Quinlan, City Manager "MONTA VISTA 79-2" This Site Specific Plan has been prepared in response to LAFCO planning requirements for evaluating annexation proposals under the Municipal Organization Act of 1977_ This plan is based upon the Master Plan for Services which was approved by the Cupertino City Council on March 19, 1979 The Site Specific Plan describes how services will be provided to the island desig- nated "Monta Vista 79-2" (legal description and plat attached) . I. Fire Protection and Prevention Service There will be no change in agency upon annexation. This area is presently part of the Central Fire Protection District, as is Cupertino. Annexation would not affect fire prevention and protection service or funding. II. Police Protection Since the California Highway Patrol announced it will no longer provide traffic enforcement off major highways, the area designated "Monta Vista 79-2" will be without traffic enforcement. Upon annexation the agency providing service will be the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department. Two Sheriff's vehicles patrol Cupertino 100 hours per week for traffic enforcement. The Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department currently provides other protection services to the island area. This would not. change. Cupertino's Code Enforcement Officer also responds to coinplaints of citizens within the City. Annexed area would have traffic and code enforcement extended to them without lowering level of service to current City residents. The Sheriff's services are funded through the General Fund. III. Library Service There will be no change in library service. No library expansion or reorganization will be required. (Refez to Master Plan for Services.) IV. Parks and Recreation The location of the nearest park is Stoke(; Avenue, the Somerset Square Park. This completed park consists of 1.7 acres and features open space play area, a picnic area, play equipment, outdoor basketball and volley- ball facilities. Annexation has no effect on park development. Recre- ation and park facilities are available regardless of residency; however, non-residents pay an additi_ona' $2.00 fee .for programs held at city-owned facilities. V. Streecs - Substantial].:= Developed or Developing Territory Except in cases of further development or redevelopment no upgrading of facilities will be required. The City w L 1 1. maintain all public streets as required. Service level- and financing will. be in accordance with. the Master Plan for Services. VT. Street Sweeping Streets will be swept regularly in areas with curbs and o!ttters. Sweeping in areas without curbs is relatively ineffective, but. will be done once or t:aice a year, which is the present Count}' program. This service is financed throu-h the general fund and/or. ; as tax. VII. Water Supply This island is currently served by the City of Cupertino hater. Utility. No change of agency or rates will occur with annexation. Refer to Master Plan for Services for City policy regarding hookup, the available capacity, and costs and financing. VIII. Gas and Electricity Annexation will not affect Pacific Gas & Electric Company rate structure. IX. Garbage Collection Los Altos Garbage Company provides refuse collection to unincorporated areas in Santa. Clara County at a rate of S4.50/2 cans. The same service is available to Cupertino residents for a rate of $3.05 for curbside pickup. Cupertino residents also receive a free Spring and Fall pickup to help maintain a litter-free community. X. Sanitary Sewer Service is provided by the Cupertino Sanitary District. There will be no change on annexation. As long as Santa Clara County Health Department safety criteria are being met, hookup is not required. Refer to Plaster Plan for Services for user charge and capacity. If, in the future, property owners wish sanitary sewer .facilities, these would be financed through an assessment district or other means. This area is located within Zone 1. XI. Storm Drains Storm drains are not available in this island area and will. not be required at time of annexation. If property owners request them, these could be :financed by said ownera. XII. Flood Control The City of Cupertino participates in the National. Flood Insurance Program. This island is not located within or near a flood plain. XIII. Street Lighting There are 12 street lights located within this area. If annexed, the City will maintain theses lights from the general. fund and/or gas tax. Additional lighting will not be required. If additional Li-liting is desired by the citizens, property owners will bear the cost. -2- XIV. Other Services The Monta Vista area has been one of primary emphasis for housing rehabilitation with Housing and Community Development funds administered by the City of. Cupertino. HCD funds have also been used in the area to improve water lines to provide for adequate fire protection and for a Higher level of water service. As participants in the housing rehabili- tation program, residents have been made aware of other social services available in the area. Cupertino currently has $100,000 for neighborhood improvements. The use of these funds will be determined through citizen participation. Annexation will not affect distribution of funds. Cable television is not available in Cupertino at this time. However, the City is meeting with Gill Cable in regard to acquiring this service. Annexation will not require any change in address or postal service. XV. Special Assessment Districts Special Districts within the area of proposed annexation. include: Cupertino Union School District Fremont Union Nigh School District Foothill Community College District Mid Peninsula Open Space Santa Clara Valley Water District Central Fire Protection District Cupertino Sanitary District XVI. Fiscal Implications Under Proposition 13 the basic tax rate for all areas is 84.00 per hundred dollars assessed valuation. The City has an additional .043 per $1.00 assessed valuatiOn for 1978-79 for Park and City Hall Bonds. Other agencies, such as school districts, may; also have a tax rate to cover bonded indebtedness, however, these would apply regardless of annexation. Less Homeowner`s C:itv's Tax Market Value Assessed Value. Exemption ($1750) (.043/$1.00 A.V.) 530,000 $ 7,500 $ 5,750 ?.47/yr. 40,000 1.0,000 8,250 3.55/yr. . 60,000 1.5,000 13,250 5.70/yr. 80,000 20,000 18,250 7.85/yr. -3- 0 The City requires every person engaged in business within Cupertino to pay a license tax of 225.00 per calendar year unless otherwise specified. Every person engaged in a business specified below shall pay a license tax as set forth. The license tax shall apply to each calendar year. Apartment house or group residences-------------------------$ 12.00 Plus $1.00 for each unit Auto court, motor court or inn------------------------------ 12.00 Plus $2.00 for each unit Automobile sales (new) including repairs, services,---------- 50.00 accessories Aggregates (Quarry Materials)------------------------------- 100.00 Barber shop-------------------------------------------------- 15.00 Plus $5.00 for each employee over one Bicycle and cyclery sales and repairs----------------------- 25.00 Beauty shop------------------------------------------------- 15.00 Plus $5.00 for each employee. Hotel------------------------------------------------------- 25.00 Plus $1.00 for each room Industrial or light manufacturing--------------------------- 100.00 Mortician-------------------------------------------------- 40.00 Oil Companies---------------------------•-------------------- 30.00 Planing mill------------------------------------------------ 25.00 Including 'lumber sales---------------------------------- 50.00 Rooming housc----------------------------------------------- 15.00 Plus $1.00 for each unit Restaur.ant------------------------------------------------ 25.00 Including creamery--------------------------------------- 37.00 Shoeshine-------------------------------------------------- 5.00 Theater: Less Char. 500 seats------------------------------- 100.00 More than 499 seats------------------------------ 150.00 Tractor sales, repairs, service, accessories ---------------- 50.00 Trailer court----------------------------------------------- 25.00 Plus $1.00 for each trailer space Upholsterer------------------------------------------------- 25.00 Vegetable truck making retail sales-------------------------- 40.00 Amusement concension, when not connected with any----------- 5.00 per day fair, carnival or circus; for each separate with a minimum activity requiring individual payment for of $50.00 participation Auctioneer (excluding any real estate. auctioneer------------ 50.00 whose business is limited exclusively to auctioning real estate and whose permanent place of business is outside the City who shall be issued a license without payment of: the fee) Billiard, poolroom or bowling alley------------------------- 50.00 Bowling game, bat ball or other similar device,------------- 15.00 equipment or entertainment Dance, publ:ic------------------------------------------------- 5.00 per day with a minimum of $25.00 Dog or cat breeding or boarding kenne's---------------------- 100.00 Dog or cat hospital-----------------------------------------5 25.00 Fire, bankruptcy or wreck sale-------------------------------- 100.00 Itinerant vendors of goods or services---------------------- 100.00 Handbillin -------------------------------•------- 120.00 Junk collector or dealer, per vehiicle----------------------- 1.00 per day Junk dealer------------------------------------------------- 50.00 Occult science (including astrology, palmistry,-------------- 1.00 per day prenology, life reading, fortune telling, cartomancy, clairvoyance, crystal gazing, hypnotization, mediumship, prophecy, augury, divination, magic or when the person who conducts same demands or receives a fee for the exercise or exhibition of his art therein, either, directly or indirectly, or as a gift or donation, or who charges admission) Parade permits---------------------------------------------- 10.00 Pawnbroker---------------------------------------------------- 100.00 Private patrol----------------------------------------------- 25.00 Riding academy, club, corral or school---------------------- 25.00 Shooting gallery--------------------------------------------- 25.00 Skatingrink------------------------------------------------ 100.00 Solicitor--------------------------------------------------- 50.00 Used motor vehicle dealer------------------------------------ 25.00 Wrecking yard--------------- ------------------------------- 100.00 In addition, the City levies fees for certain services, including the processing of planning applications, building permits, a plan checking fee, a charge for blueprinting and other engineering services. XVII. Land Use Regulation The General Plan calls for 4.4-7/dua (single family to duplex) with commercial along the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage for the area of the proposed annexation. Cupertino proposes to prezone the area Planned District with residential and commercial uses allowed. -5- 0 0 ` / C.iy l.;m:�5 br nh.ieun+.a.- e.c�.�led "I•-lpt}tESTE4D 3-C, Rev�ged ! � q 4h.VKo+-odf Rom• ` ; 1 j,. i 1 sTEr✓Ei� - eiz ®� v70 0 n rn�! \ \ \e` gCACE c" = Z SOO' Ov C ' J C. v � ro THE ~' \S"4�7(.-,3- �____�'_— I►� entitled ST E V E N S ° Cl ( CREEK n } MOW TA %VISTA '?C)— r m o C;A.y L,-.-;+s ey11 p �6 m I SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 24 AGENDA GATE March 5, 1979 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Island Annexation Timetable BACKGROUND This matter was continued from the last meeting to allow staff time to meet and formulate a time schedule. I have attached a report from Dorothy Cornelius of a tentative timetable as suggested by staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the t--hiietable as enclosed in the attached report. APPROVED FOR SUBNKISSION TO 'fill" CITY COUWIL Rol)ert W. Quinlan, 6ity iana�,c r is ls'ncl. Cit'4 of Cuperti"o TO: Robert W. Quinlan, City Manager .' DATE: March 1., 1.979 FROM. Dorothy Cornelius, Acting City Clerk SUBJEC'+ MONTA VISTA ISLAND ANNEXATION TIMETABLE A meeting was held Monday; "r'ebruary 26, to review a draft Master Plan for Services for island annexations and a Site Specific Service Plan for the proposed Monta Vist- annexation. The revisions of the above plans are now being completed. A tentative timetable: was established for the island annexation. It is as follows: March 19 'Taster Plan for Services and Site Specific Plan to be presented. to Council for review. March 27 Meet with island residents for review of plans and to receive input on Site Specific Plan. If residents basically approve of the Site Specific Plan the annexation could proceed with no delay. However, should they nog approve with the 1,roposed Planned District prezoning, both tite Director of Planning and Development and the Director. of ''ublic Works believe the necessary ordinances and legal descrip- tions for any other. prezoning would not be available until after completion of the Cupertino/San Jose boundary reorganization. Therefore the balance of this timetable is contingent upon residents' approval_ of the Plan. April 16 Final Council. approval of Master Service Plan and Site Specific .Plan May 14 Planning Commission prezoning hearing June 4 ouncil prezoning hearing June 18 Second reading of prezoning ordinance and adoption of resolution initiating proceedings This completes the proceedings conducted by the City. All documents ar.e then. submitted to LAFCO for. consideration. Attached is a Su(—estcd l.etcer which might ire sent to island residents . DC:na D R A .F T Dear Resident: The Cupertino City Council is considering the annexati.cn Of unincorporated land in which you reside. The potential for annexation results from the passage of a State law known as the Municipal Organization Act of 1.977 (`tORGA) and replaces former procedures and requirements for annexing unincorporated land into a municipality. NORGA requires that the City prepare two types of municipal service plans. Tile first is a general plan for service and the second is a site specific plan. The Master Plan for Service, as the general plan is titled, shows the municipal services that would be extended to the unincorporated areas. 'Tide Site Specific Plan shows how those services will be provided to each specific area. Based on Council direction, a Master Plan :for Services has been prepared, as has a draft Site Specific Plan for your area. You are invited to attend a public meeting for review of these plans. This meeting will provide residents the opportunity to ask questions and discuss concerns , as well as to provide input prior: to Council 's final approval of the Site Specific Plan for your area. The meeting for the unincorporated area in which you reside has been scheduled for (date and time) at (address of meeting) We hope you will be able to attend the meeting listed above. If you have any questi.ons,. please do not hesitate to call me at 25_'-4505. Ann 01111"Enk Am a R AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 34 AGENDA DATEFebruary 20, 1979 _ SUBJECT AND ISSUE Island Annexation iNlonta Vista BACKGROUND At the last meeting staff stated and intended to prov_.de at this meeting a time schedule for the island annexation program, with specific attention being given to the �Ionta Vista area petitioned by the residents for annexation. Due to the time required in reviewing the proposed agreements with San Jose on the boundary transfer issue and other urgent loatters that arose, we were unable to develop the schedule for this meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Continue the matter to the 2Iarch S meeting. APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO THE CITY COUC-'IL ;1oert W. Quin]_an, City Manager RWQ:j s ANNEXATION MONTA VISTA 79-2 2 of 2 1979 , .. . - M _. - - 11 c 11 _ _. „ 0 �� u ,. - '--- ) i .. li (: - 11 �� / I—i - (-" �� n t., _: 11 E 1I L- 3 :, / , , , 11 ) r, n �i;iI:l II.I��l�II!I I�I:��I I�I�::�:!��I.�;IF�i�II I II������I,I�!I1t� T __�. v„ °�• Y,r7..,.yh 3 ,r as H^nxrff.� 7 ,yrx: xy�p,­-.,,.,_,­'1',-�.,_,��,,_�,--6�v ",� �"1\-�,I I,�,M,w,I_)�I I,_I.-�--I�-�_'- 1,,I�//I\I, . 1 \,I_,\I.,,e--��:I I��­�i��. _,)II)i ll�,�.I IIII1 I,1i1I�-1."!1"I1.I.�I I �-�-,�,/,�-'�._I,���I, -I-",,,�"I-1�1I 11I,�,��,-,�o-lI"--1,,_,�..1I�I�/I,,'�I-�_).I"II-",I,I I�--I��I ��I J\\I,I�,-'-.,-�"IIO�I:J I" ..I,1\I I 1�I- _.-., I�)���-I,;1,1-.I I�I ­-�I'I ��i�(f��I�,�./",I/I1l,1 (I I�,.-I11�, I I i�I I-�_I��I,�_-/-,�"1�1�1. ,(�I II)I_ �, I�� I1 I,�-4�KI,/�I,I z.�7r-I"II I)�,—,,I��II3,�.,1I���6-.-V"II;,I!;,,)I I.:.1jI-!I1I.IIII;iU!1 1I�,III�1II.III�—II.i�I�III II�.,I"��I,IIIN!I�,I I-IIi�I.iiI_L ;�ii-..I.I,�,i,I--�._­I,�,,"..I%1,I.,,:-,1II I I I,�"I,,-,�',I l­.II",�,..,�L�I�,_,.I.1,_v,.�'..�I,..II-.,.I-.���,,1...�1�I.�,*�1..-rII.I��,I��.,I,,1-I._I.I'1,"I 1-"'",�1�1_.-�I1.,.�-I I 1I�,_"1-II`-,I1,I.��:II�-1���.-II�.,I.­,,1II��-7.,,I.I,1I-�_,,�I,�1_,.�I�I I:�I.�,4 1II I.?"��--�I�--1 I,��,II I-I['II�� ,I,iL1 ,�--.-1I,—I,I,,-,,1�-1,.II�:-.,I.,�I�_��I�­,_.—�-I',1].,�,,.-,�II I�,,—C.,I,,,,..II,��,.-,,'I.,'11, .r�.I I�'*1,�.I I�`�-,1,,���I.,�­�..��I-.'I I_��I1�I�.�',,�I 1:a�,..1.II,_A"�1��I,,�'-,1,jjj.­,.,-�-..I."I--I�.�,���',,,I 1:'1 I�,,,"V-.I.�­.I.�1I;;;.;—;.-..[��I,:f��I,I II,Ii-�'—�,�.I.,.,�1"��1II,I.I,_���,.,�. ,I.,-I,1-�."II�!1I I1.'II��I���I­,I-�,,.I:I,_I�.,,"-.,�,I,-�I I,-I�4—I,�I1,,�",III�".,-.0,_.,,�—,".�.II!.�I�.:I I,�-,..I...,,.I.II".,1I�-,,i1,I,.I I,�,�,:.�1'I,.,,�,-.�,I I,1.I.I,�l�..Ir,,.1�,1�z I�..i..I 1,-A'1,��1.-1,,..�1I-�-�',.I��I..,.-'1��.,1��,:II�,4��I�I._..,-1��,.oI�I*1I,.�-�,.I,).1I'I,�+,I,,",,W'��,Xl-,*�I.�.I-I,,II 1,I-��,I_"'I I,,.nII�_I­,I-II4-�1­-I%I-,�I,..I'-I.�:.I.,.I t.I-,,I-�-.a1.1,.1—,I,,I-..­.�'I.I�,I��I,I�.,�.I,I-_r I L---I,I,,�4�..,-"II,,c�I.I__,�II,-,I�.II,5I,.I.,,,I-r.,I I_I.�.I,F.�,II I,—��I-1.1 II�II—��.:I I,'1-1�,�-,,:I.:��-��...,I,,-I,-.-��..,��.,"-,-,:I,-17��I,..�-I�I1 I�1I­.I I.�I-_,:-1.,,,—,�:t LI.,I I�I",.1�"l--I,I1 1.1 I�I"_I��,e.:�,­L-rI�,,.._I.,�.�II��'��'iI�1�I"I'�;,:��1�I I:1-:-..,,I 1,,,.I,,..I:::I�I!�:1_,I�'­�I,1IIr".I'-�,,,,I,�,I t,;I,,�._��1,.I!0 1I�,"�;.1��:*.7_..�I�-.I�-I1��I_*iiI,�-.,,�'-�I.I.�1��-_,�-1,I_',11.'I,�-�"��-­.I-..-.I0�,.I"�,.,II-,� "I�-:,e�-I�I"I,I1_�;,��.�.��_�-I.I..,:-7I,.o I�,I',,,1%IA.I"-—I�­�I,,',-,:_"..�",�i.-1,1:I;,�-,'I,­,'1.�.:—,'1.I,'�­��.�.�.,.�-.-V,",­.,-�I.��.,_.;,I I O"����,�.I�-* �_,.1 I.,.,-'�*"�',-�I--��,��6 1,"_I._,,,;.,.I�"�,-,�-..��-'",I'I,_­I I-_.�1.I�,",..,.I����",-1�1 I�II,I�-.,*'�I*!�I?"�.,.��,1�*I,,,_,1I,I,i'.�-��,�1I��.,"_.,�:.II%;I,-"�"1 I.,,11I�1.�.����.�-:II�I, ,­1�1....��1.!I,�.,.,,,t�,-.-k,�Ip 1�.�,-',,:I�I-I.11-�i.�,I,II._;��.,,.,..,�I'I_�-.1.-��,,�.�,.y,�:"�,,�'",1.,.�I�;-,,,II iI,I�"�,,�,,,,I"..I,,.'.I1,II.,�­­.�I,I.���,,-I,,,�,..�".:,,��'�i��,I,I�'11�I,1..�—,�I'10..,�1�"�-.�.;..*,',I`-�,:�q,.I-1,�..��:,.,.,,I.�.�1.I%,:�.I.,,,F'I'I II.:,­1.,I�III,�.,,.��,-I,�..,;'..�,�'�I�I..I.,11..�.I�,,.,".�I�:."�i,,3�,1.�,:I,I­,,�i �, ' - g Y :;,i,1��, - ,I,,:",.I,�,�.,;..*.�-�i.,.-',.I-I,.�,,�.1,",".�11,I'.,..,�'�;-.,�.1;'­, ,11�-1.�'I .,,,,,,41,1..,,',.::,. _�.,oI 11;.,'I,��,�I,1I:`*,,,I!I I.,'-�,,'�,�nI�I�1,­�I��,�—4,r.IV.:.1�,���I� r,1�:_�,�.,1,."1-�­,...,�1.,",I;���..II1 o�'4 I,I,, ., _I�,1:,,"� �I,_:�.--- ,I'YI,,�.-�",n��,,���,I_, `��,1j'�I,,-.�1=��-�',I1.,e­4-I, -Il," �'1I.,,I---�,'.�.I.,,,I�-;a I II,.-,.'-;,,,, ,,."".1"I�'I.11�0,,,I�-.­�_,.I.1-,,�.,I'�,I I,Ii�,I,�,I 1..'�I.I`�-�--,,I.�I,�.,.I,y�,i,:.'i�m,,R,.� "1-,-1�1.I,-I�,..,.,..II...�,�I�t-1_I:!'�-I�,,�.,,_,1::,.,.-�I.�1,.1 ,",,�,.I:�I�­-.-,,,-­1:-��.,'-,,, �_I"���,��-�­.,1 0.�:�.I��-,I­�;1 1�,iI 1%�­'_—,,,I, ,'I�e.:, .,';�..t,,�'�. ,,"-�,1�,��.,---:"�,,j,--,"Iw!,-I,,­_,� I ��p.,�;'�—.�II­r,� ",1,.t-I,.'�4I1.,,,,i,:,,:­.�".:4'I +�Wt'1,,r-�"�7.-I 1',,!.�I�,,,�.�i-p.,­ �,,I".r��,�,:,,�� 1,,:,,�-,-�"1,��-1 i 1�I,.I" "���".1'1�j i r ~t {^.x , ' y #; r ,# 1 # ��, 1. a.5 t f, .*kr t MTYtzt ',"ff"y - ,� .�I��- ­­, �:1.�.�.- 11,1 ,II II IiII �--.I fi ... ,/� /� 'rn ,s .a, .i , '} t t nk,i+x :.�.* v �„e4.tck.y r �•�", �' sµ' '' Y ,f-' Y yu Ik't}! , ,. Y k: p �." r ,r, r p•� i .r'a..^ r .r ice? ta{�f6 5A d,.. i * '` f, p `�. tea^ .pis -" 'k ,1 • -,:.. , k .,it ! 'x#' F�. 5 .tt. ;Pie,,• .5t',c ' >3. !., 4c .t1 1, d r , ,..a:. a.,.y k :f$ z.'r (L�4 } ,�1 `SSW�`F`a t'yd �f'm,""r„ �"' 7`�... '�M +: ,, .. - ` t �y� ' w 4 4 . 7-k 1 ...; ,r "•- F **T /71t Y,4q tSa`.. 'r3�k y,t, '.Wl +:, .. t V II .� ! - t f.. 5- ,v ry ra': 4 .,r„g.,, .a 4 a ":ji* �T'L�"i^!�'>rl•�'Y �kt`x r `+- <�'f.•,r4 .Y>, '�k,._ ,8.k+„ `".x-• Y'P..A; �'ru lid J'", ,:,.., - ��1.I�1- 13 -11 II 11 ... . r , 4gy i. ,.:r { x t aj��,a�,; ''tf 4� t T wt 'Fi fi- ' r`�.r -! t{ ':fr 4 5.b„ '�a -:.-..r I. "' ^"' ' .:` r; I'C'i:-A$ - - .�.ilw...,, x, -;�,+ ,1•!3's!y 3f 1aY .a 4 „r •t,,.,;, b•'"�.,T Y+,I R ar,i: .ti.. r" 'b,�'a' .rs •fill rri� t, ._ ! 1. :, - r t~, .} .a ar '"-.Ik{t r $ �:. ,'i h C.r. .„ih r !ar,C,4't M,:.f) a4'-•i'.n;?";'ka S,{bye{.. ri`}:s,i.k •,# ._ ,r a a£ ` ` ,�1,,I,1%.,;.',.­o�I�1,.,�","-,I.1O11�`��,-_:,1-1­.�"��.,."�,..I;,I-,I,li,�,.�'1,­_X-,.-�,'­,,I;I,.7,"­1"'�.,;:"�1-��%-w,�".,,",,, �,1,1.­,;�,.;_�I�—;'NI-,��,,�1".1��..1"-,.;-�'11t,�,-,,.�,, ..- o A.. ,". I + z ,I ,t. "•i'. '. t; 14 r+`.c`.di. r I..t 't7iis;..t i '..i __, �' ..Frw t':. 't'•,'' 2, ';' t ".,,. :.4 ri+;a:;g? t a> t ,;a; f`dK" '.a,5:,,°4r `' i '=� ti - - /I1I(,' qO Ii II p y ' {" " " ',' ` 1 1!' r�.,.} C ��w r I F'' €{SrraY:S *t$e ,._' t, rw`•". ;r:\;. ,� -n,, I .`•t'S'u ,., t+�y}•� �,� I a b 4 "` �}s7,^w d...9 7. e. r �+t r Tt *r „ :_4,.VI�1-­I'_�1 I'-;,IE,,�I-,"4.2�?�,�I�.,1­"I�1.�l;f-�Or",:I,I--�t,�I,�,1 1­I�I�­-I".��� I r S, " x'ic , i P , -i�. &s� 4N1 Oft �D`,`A h�{Y3 v nu,7 r :: r yy .. r 4h ,'.fir,, iv3u'k2�,f$,,•J ` .sT,+[; a'!, - i"; a , kt P . ,, fi M, ,{ F a.�, r tw,.. a 44h, J�,y k cr+a t,, +� � ;r, �,, n , - ,\ I , -: I f . ,b :., 'P ,.' ..:;: >{..u.t}y.'1 'c vti.' .5t 1 �*'2..t li l= 1;d •t -s It,.'. C•k .e14's"€F',:.,a �„u"?`. -, , -- - I .A, :, _ �... c ;ac . .,.y,. : tt.��:,,•L'�ir,;":.;. 1 {, iy�..:,M S :? '> �f",','arr y,' ,T4, yA;p.. ,a'1 - .. 1 'y \.,{ ,,.ix,nE rY;. s' Y - `;'- •a-,',4' +�: t r ..+6,L w,{'' '. .y,`, i'i.a- } yir 1 1� ..�. _+ :i�h "`,^. ,. .: ,y, `,+,r #14q+ Nr,x �.'g., a :.,ut.:'� � .,kr ;y c'•a k:7; e1 "'L t(:� - -'1.. .. .._ r.,c ,. ,, ¢ , i.. , x:: ,`r* i --", •k '$�k,.Fa+y w �AZ; k'c rs{:.� .y #"' ta� .c:e'S aii'si' iyA fr ,.a y "A y„j., . _ ' ". . , , 5`A P 7., .}.. dx C .dt Y 1'\ �1{,,•�jj `4`�'' Wt S,t a t yy i4�„ - I w,- , 4. '.., ( ..x., r .,.. rt�e S r'j« h +`f.x r;,`€§°ri' ." r r ii" °:,SA. `t .t 3,!d'''�".r ty 'jn �Pt ))[� _ 1 ,Y i:. ,r" r+ 7 f, -a, a }r,ith ,7;.,5, & F.� ntr' ,-ZZ;, `r'---k,id n p �.D1,yy`" T <t �C -(.G'`" ,r.q:.., D �, ry a.. ,� ,,. "- M :vy.r t„ M i;,i .7 ; i` ,,v,f r a("+ ., -ht, ,�4 ry'S'``irF+, y,z- , • ! ��� ^' �'" .. : , ,,ury c ,`'" :a?- + t -`t i:',: d n .,'`' 3 ,r,n l�?5 i t, �. '+'#,; �. t x rua .1„I r.;:' '` ) = - �` I rr -•�,C •a. .,r ut•,w"xl t .kr �T,.�,e xxar ,,' y, " - r 1: t t W! t t. d 1y. "i";u'4M"M Y [ v 3^9v�,,.,r-' my.., ,t ) „ A �. / ' „ '' ,�3ti' , $• ,`i a a Via« a ' Y�fi,'�:5 an :.x # ; +fit Wt <_kr ✓ i �¢. �� : I. i< I U " - mi 'H1 #,.'h�, ,,ufx ,' t,.•Et+,t- -'ryy rM r, k"' rr, F'va,� r ,.yx T.y sk. -,Y`+�x l�, U � — ,. `fit }._ t ,} '` y. ;. f ri �f - I 4 t _t :. "C,''N, 53,r ,« c 4; �,t a 5 �5s`d,.IWWz�. tlf yf Mt "� �7 I i, i � �`� z 1 S Nsy+ rt -e t+ "s f',Y 'yut��+". �' rt _ + , i� o 1. '.y - w ., . I\I\ 1• s � � b , o ' i ,at r ;•,.( f If 4•_. - ,( .fl. 1 .' „ .. v , ..t l a :_.; • „ I` ' r, I I o,,. ... , c rt,, d M' P .s' a h4 t K t `, ry 1Y ` ,- c , S; 1' Y , M � k / a �$ {r .aka `} ti.- 1_,1��.,I�.,i I.�i�,�1;,,I,,,,1 i r i _. - M h ry 1 "+ Nat`� ,.aP. +.Y� n y i I •. _ '�- _/ 1 i . r ., v:. Wra C '. fiAa �'! 1 a -o- •4 L".t .1.t'. ,•f TF 1k 4v. ,S I ,r �t ti .. , n ," ( k N," a T y i� PASADENA AVENUE ;- ' u ;- asp'r7;fir W'r"`ryh t r'{ r a�'j t�. \, "? +w pry P .+`° a. u <r,e `t r r` �;Y Q -: -r ' e ''. h •k �rsk yam? P a ',a, 1• a t"{LF4Na�c .'.!'J '•tyf . ,�. ''`•`\ - 5 a✓ ',r r , a 17 r- L 'epi" '3r`u tCM t . } `?w? " \� ' l,;c , ' ,: f r- a'r )r i t 3Z K t 4 a,.C" s f4\ i r. -_ c '� ,,, '_. 4 k' 4 ' t,�. a xN -',� �'�� C s 4+€t ,„ r, s , _ ��,�. `J .Q ; ,t fit' ,.p r:. ♦a �ii>?, r a� i iy«Ir; - Ity i' s Y S` t l . ,. ti (' rho+•, \ N} j L'�,f" Y A. .I`J j1 A J.�'' "P ..'' _ i jL -, - L• '/ f .f t P b '!�tl'y S .t ft 1 .,,., J -, 7 I , n1 . t ,,, r „tx ,3r', t {a ,, t o j r �r 4 at a t d >; W ,ir { 1 4'q, '+ ,cC j ti1 D N a +.' I .I��1I�R,,`.I:�..--"1,,�'�1,._�":,�P''-,.�_'I.�;--�,1-�:,111"�I�;�1-,,.'1-�­,:;.�-t.,���,�-.,'�7�,,,1.!-,t.�,�1�",�,1..3-,"',.,I11,.I,,�;�c:­,.",�,��;.v�,,.,I,;.�,-.;�_!�!:­',..,�V&,�_,�����1_�,'�,,­ ,­ l - w`:5 :• t :,'Ax # -^ •' n.-I�h,�} 5' }` e �"Y v:s,t{s rro z,>s+�:, �rdY^.f L, '�"-., �� '`r /"lT t y. r -e'Y. ; t�" -a. r€; �i{ 'Cf I �,� N: r , ; i �, M r r fi q a s k�S ;4 `4 I s a r;) :��­-.�I I,1,1,"'­�,.__.,��1�2t_I;,,,��"�..,,�,�,-_­.4 1 I�.,7;.''1.�1."!:�, -.I:�:'_.,�,.,I,,',1-..�1,1,.?i­*:t I_1'vv,,:.. Y V 1 7 'K: '4 z ,�i ri, ..C,.q X y},y�y,`" ,,, Y kr.� Y'4 It ,., - s r l k i +'`r� , II - } `,, / `'r4 y..-- •{+ f �.f', Pw �sv a.'. n t4' { 7.c ,a z' Y i -: :! - *I ,., £ r 9 t� '1 .;tr N= 'T .w}tn�y`.3; t 4 pa��y k r+ f i f 01 Y,', �Y'"�' T�x.X'SkS� �I Yry,r,,,r{t'4,, r i b'p R i A ` a .:t Y .p yy 4. sr�,,a t t'p.'i .� ar wwx'k}.a H;�ky,'c �45 ( .,.'� -..-_I4.--_.II.�,,.,���.I�7-��1,,g i,�,�,"1�.1,,.1.�7,��,I_,,,!'—,I,I,.,-%���--"'�...,,,I I V.,�,,:.,,-.,��� t1 X L+y fYc yt 3 .ay'., ,_� 4 t.o` 1>S •, X. .. 1 T, { I- ; r .,"y ,.x xl f­ ,.icy i f' 'c m i vy;}, �.f M 7 r '1 ; Y as 4i R i w"'"�v x ^,'.fdt i Y ,:�",i� �x�i ;.N ' r r� tj .' @ 1 { t p y k, r s § {, 6+ x u L .r;o' ti',._ ,;t, �f.a +., -„t`! a1'kA+', f _. y r I :, r i, ..K } e+. '`G"Ps,' 'a'. ra .s3' �G.uS 5«-r.' t _ �tsi a , r{ '" t ;`+� o f+' I.,r J, r a 'i.. F'£ !� mow•". 'I.. T y ''".y .2y, ,�, .. W- t` a- x a ✓:` i -ry1''x�..,u v '`:1 wy ,.'R" �a,. F .+FS'k'?,-`�. �. ,'n .2 Ali �'r.,,,, �' -F,a:,;t T. `,,, s - ,•, k t -' :..+.9ka'Y'.�4'1,,, sr; #t-"c$5i"5�.� ;:$''" -0 J ,.t�3yIs X_.a ,,.°l. - t `l t x % a, il'!h, .k -:5Y Yo-L a .M.-.Pa t K Yr i•, 'a'4. 1 4" a 'r::� �. "'�a ',. ...sr w.$.. � t't'Q r,,n..'::»' ,•Lyy.. v,.0 +y,,, ��W.H3 ;':•I µ '.. ,ttr�,k:',� q S 'iY� �; t Yb ,J l 4 3 A Y Z,; 4 - �✓ i� ,. �, ,.,,r ,. s a t. ,,. eJ't}...:5' t`, 2:*•'»..t\. '1 xi+�':y!e 'c4ir '{7• .r,.�y : �, - I ,._ ,y ..-. y s t,... }}t" "1� ';a 4E4Yy, b-.=,,.. �;c. WC' f y Tti �2 `rt ;7•.- ,:, t ,: `r ' r.. i ., -' ''v k. ,,;. '' - ��'^ :::j! 1 `. - ,'",f -:m a fK) �,�� ,M E'r s i.ha `+fit`'`.�: ` t r ��ixk,`R. ,. } "....:. T ,.. ''Yi # 3 x. .n�m T�k .�':, _ w t p; Ir• :,i, 4 . , -I, ,t '1 >. . • - , Y. , ,. 3 .. .,cr -;x. . '$,' :'i.nt,Ty,' Z + 't`�`... ,z + ?g rlyt', r I ... [,; ..,. ,x'<-: $ ,'W,1"rt i �,'T+w« ti.: .fir,*" ti^a4} 1 ��,, �e is <. -[� T" L"J5 x 1 , 3t, ;H 4 n y+e: a _ ,: 3j .. t "I - � �'Y(1•� 'S ',�. L :a 'ajrr �'" , �u`D y' �t°� tiQt xt � �:Y..1 r.. ` �,-:: 'I, ,,, n rs.. ,t� ,tna, a: 2kxXM 4 -t?x} 3 d�. ,'1: i e , , ¢" _ v' , r bl t /// y , '« a" -3'1.- '.` ei s r rxc,' t xt 5 t , , Yi �r II �- II dI .:t. .w4 - 1 + w t{ {• ., t,, k t f F ;r pa�^' I.,Y" bi�'� Y ,;'r I _ .. k 1 "n ,r.r a,,,h, ;1yr•'Q,_"a. jsS�l a«7 4.: s• k c r1.3 yv ,a _.Q .3. ::;11 1 } tr.f i '.i C''r<lt v 1tM �T :�; '7-. ..3 Y :;�1. �,, *•9 f y •'$;T�, T L } ,,,i A 35 A] C,fN !}'' uY r } 2 "} ,,}i i, j" !; ^ eu" 4 I h a }} ,.I r x AM u 4. c I4'_ a t to y it {'u . , '',.� - :. ..:'..€ ' " ., t l ems, Y < Yr M ] s t +. m , ., J 1 ( ! vn 1 1 F, t_�s w'ka'*' a "Srt"� i•:, i •,Se 4+�f..(tz:, I ry` , �) r _ - - , s �' p. Tr „ . n. a g ra (I tt :: "• :: r < s, x r p, r �ii i fah i . . r,as �i'd "x I Y -, -ry;x' t4 ",,ham a`#,'�wr y. a Y,',rX": r 7 .:4I fro .:LCfI 1 - +� , j - :, O ".: ! o o __ i� a (- .. - .„ 1` ` :. 7 � � s, I RII J )i 12 '-1� 3 4 \ I Si B1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 71 12 13 14k 151 I - I �� J �, ,. . .1 I I , I 11 � � - 11 I k � 1, � 1'1��\ TP V ' f t dt ` `t',L,£4N � fFi• �'+,Y �i i,„,y-,�>r, ,-x�' •�.�c-: e,yy,}�•w ,�} ,•��t �''r�•st-�".:sf�?',y, e•>ti �h� µ4,t• a+�.„ � 1'�t �„n gr�`a••'��v� +- •;�i`i -_-"..(/J- ...-_.,�,_., 0.7- �a`�:a •t �.... x,.,.:e.. f�jr�` '.::... at- iy� .. '•:`.�,..a s�K: .,,,. :f: r,�r rt.��:.i..'ri �`r# '4�-a. t �k�{�!h u ��v, ., S P1.._ V .. J9 s�• p +},'a- gad ."rs RL°1'' ^'.!'tl1 i�.�`a{�Z Yf,. "F7,.9 ''tdi��j�'1.,�•�i�., { t y �•F- "c': .� a.. T-....-,,..,-.,P`.x 2 :.. i `�',, - ' ''»�'j�`! ..'.'`aT,ti'" ''i'•, y(• � •S�a:.'.,F'-'e� _ ,;tom >! A ,Lt;�¢�` 5 .h('4 M�t }r<,#y � t F�,c, 1/, ,t, Vi li 1 " ." ':.s; r \;, #h�,. ...w '�'� s;�".}::. •�,'' ��,.,,;t,*r t,•fnt$'a. y4 tt`r,��-t TfK,3,+c£3 /zs;-i;�W a ! �'�i:' 't r��3 ,'kr• 'fir.;, 'F �,. -sa ,a n:'Y o-i e ..�i• t :tfi ( f Mr» ,,.^^ s- "Y a ..'} P ;:"•�+<, Jh!v'ti;'a "a M"»r7,�i r. e,T.Fa,.we. •'.. 'm n Y, ryr nil errs w r ,r.C. A...c. 7?;7rr...fi. �=b.. - .:,- .. <: .=... #� �.�;+.a,:,. "�tT, .r.;e'E ,�•'e..,xA-+{,.• :. & i :sh axm�r.tyt: `.4�ka..:, �„'+" t{�*,-: PAW", ,t� Tyr •..+. TJr 2Y a ur t .,, sx '' }.t�N s' L z:; z3� ya � = } � ',•a+ ,. 1 r k'.:,Kte, M: +'. .A.r =r::'ra•�.;y+ t N' °'Ns.".+f+ r1 '}` ^w�Aei' M4+},tr .,rs. ,.a, YIP'")' � � ,,.,c.. ate, � -... "^;C ^r +r;i"'£> ., k .yh0a.€(,;y,�+�-,,,s.v ...s,� y�3 tF "�f,�J.. •�` h,.?c � "?3�� i'`"�,• .v,.,•r •�.. ;,:\t.:r y,,.,i.,..+!t< s.�»,k r�:rr 'k., p.v,� ^-e.,,.. -. ? '. �,:�'.k,G,,..._1i.... �+:.:•�4 ,r..?u,'';L;&.�1�-. .,u,s} "4- -"`�::;•. a,T+. � ''• :s5r5'4 a.s7 lk r t„ ,c`� f,Mt � 4r�� , ,(��M1. � , ..s .,,F +•• :,ar a, >a.�t3. N� a,4'{ ;.v ((ci,.�,x,,��,� .� �.�� 1`,}:.ii. f ,- y :, ii v.',�.�. �x 'fir.�,154 .y:r:� ,•.r ��'X �'-.f fi x: hxta'A?'. $� �i>t �� �.,�4yi. u��. 't{`�l e,t�"i' .. S., ,.s :.:. ( y,4„ih f . F(t..-:r(y �•:T,�..._.,�} '.� , .j;�V � ;�"-�. }ay 6..f'�{�•''\.L,�'�,1. 1$'dY+w. u,Tq !,,'� _ �,,e a;'' ,, ,-.d• � t...: ..,-.,._H...,.. , ... .. .... r , ... - - "�+,W •h nk.. �} t,n��!' A'`ix �, :�H, a." n.:'m Yt ye,„ a., � ..x ,,., . ,�-. � ,.� '�.�as. - �-t �, .+a.. ,� e..f�,r a•k r�. .,. �� ,�;+ u +, r v �l;� z �C�i�L,r r• �3� ^.1 r, . - ^',y,s y,...,.: '^ � il.� � :Y 4.y ,xt........ ,,v y";e.S4 '^t e. fnf. >,f �,.. 'vrRi`. S, `G- .}`+ •.{C','L ,.� N,'..�. '6pv, 4 r t r1. i ti 2 ,x •^: :r ,?:"£r` a,,;ti �. .� ,r.q'. x .... 'r. :.,5�, .: �t, :.x,±' � ,r. )�. 1 ri,.,... & �. 'ix F� . .:b. d r'x»+.:.5p t f� �+'' rs., ,. 'dF.a}"+t!'� +a e'�:x�'•`s 2'd+ ?4.v ti ,r�;. "r, 3;: �;'�i rF�.�•i�4.'. �"{; t A\ �� •t ,.,`x�� fib^ �:. ,• � �& tt« � ,_ n,. r� r t2s�#"` iy�a '~.t.y n 3,'7 C"' -,+`".t )} ,:. ,# '^.:.:' •^ ,. ,r'.;-a.. .. a,.',.., ..: t''",: . a.��' .fi f+.'s x •£i YC. � �.�y ,x,.p v-t I � �, r .. y r"A'. , :, •.;, �,, a ,., .. 4- .. .., ,. :a-`. ,.,,,. ,'. .., •' ,'' �' .,eJf- <T �y��: ,... � . >}rr ,..., r.s. w� r,.t� ?fit, x�{•" '�,. n ..,�.rF`k. }C =r ,x.- i i,'��'� �. ,N� , �•,f• ..""41s� $ t �� ,�, .:r.r v u , ...., .. s yy,..,. • ,,.,a ,,.'�" u-«-.N �;; „s ti�,, it:S..„ �, , : .t �r �s �" ��T t{ •t «;,"s.r; � _ Ip ;..,_. t ..qc.;,,t t ,.i ,., :.•, fi • (:.�.,.�,...: ,�,..„ ;l....,"'Uy'Ene. t,, u.�� .y,wy +�w, ';3'��, xa'.i,% �*:g4.7Y'r45 �� ,,r:,. �`� �: �+ +.•:r , ,'C r .2't a r .. ..,, 1 :. --�,, �:, ,. ,._ � +� a..:..., •,...,. v ir�r�� ;t� b t � I,. Ew �'i•�,J`ee .�.{y� ?' r ,. .- .. .. .�, 4r., � bas ,,,,r• �# #:{f",.. 4*, �cx =r�,�xr �t ,f.,^ ,,_,^+,rJ� �i,,: iqt '•k ,%«.�.� �r�..? `�.,.4, -�� ,.r,.i..;.H;./,•;/'^,i'.,'... s�f•k. ;n$k,.J,'a'.•::.':,Y i_n.;;,-•,r•h!rt N+xr,oncro.°,`>r".-,�:::r�:,.'W.x '"xevfi`y4,.g.rf[,P::�ir�.,p�:,�".r�,'?�s ry.•yC,x{{r•xi�'tre,,,t...#tv.-+F k"W..-rt,;,::..,>.•n...,.:..� , ah✓�k'2.ax Vi'{,t`,.a.'d,-.t,.:u:r>,ti,,a�.�,?�kJ x"s,.Fn a1a�,5a,,�gJ`w;.�t.i r!S•.""n,wx+:,.<r*ptti.7.,,i t_, w_r.,b..ra,J:w,£�'?e'�a:,.,aa�S4',,.�./.SM�;:'J'f,n="`j r-F.!u�yi"*.fiT.t.��•y.yK.,a'G fm.r'dt.,4:`. •Et,t.`1h,+q-bix.+.T,''z'{..�.i{:xr.X F+ / } ;Y + {ir'rfi{ , '' ,.,„•.tr dby:t.rSx..'y.4,^tRt•'^F�A.�=s Flna!.t r�-,uSY-+,a<�.v.",�•���F5.�E�+>,1F�ra4 t e'c+.r1-S,!,lY.`�vF.�.,^..�✓,'.,,:..t.w g+{ x� �� , � ,... �� ;.1 (`✓', :r ' o ,. fi .fit yta 'h:. �_ a �. �v#':�;.r d £ »� r `''" ` o'''' * 5 ^a t y` '.}±i yg 2 :.�4 fi` :.+;+�:} r.1§�•�','�F�S �� 'Ac p , ?;:` f iq�.. i� 'a.'y ;� �'�,1,`. '� s y5, ^r £ZiAab�. �•. � ya.a' � ).d` s . Fr. Icy .: v, .. �+k+,>�'9,•p e't t ,A ,r7, T ,Kr a ., _:,Q,t ', „.,., •.�7,.:`*rt „.:'.fi8`�' � - „ ` sr yF,' .,,.,,+ .k s,t: 1;h^.. .: $ � + •`G• ' p' yt...-{.- >{x0. x •:i. - .- , �Kx i y' { c� n - y, u , .. P .. I / � + ,+" t S + Y� t P F� ✓7:` t�t ^' � �t t1 � !.a.. 4-f, i• k 41 e -'� •z ..P��g•. �s, �' 'T rn M 1 x ?e, "� 's [ b+ .,.a.: n,„ l,. x „ li ;, 1 - . :- s ., '. ,;w r '� •j � t it#�1: t. t * rev T� ,fi?�t.t ' ( � ' \� - } ii •- '-' ,{ ,, ,� ,,,y# K° r<ne .'`s�,;;,.y f, k •$ ! yF . 'a.-�,.•,i�' t ,f '. :c tt t " +y. - I }{ v )9'�' 'I'..x M JI'. 1 ` J ry• } `.„3 OR .. -._ ( - a `. , C R a.Py. t:•••^ f y�r >.. i� �'x .4., `+.�. •r �'K n+?F w', l.=:t - •; �' QAS/ DE1r�1 V et 't h.2• .16'}f t'o : "M 1 vS "i'�, �-fe k•'t¢ TT,"' !F".wc tL y.1 11 _ t 1 � " # 9 �`-. L� 4a tr". «'x sx5. {t eK t t W& rh!' �`•�"' - x.� �. __ - JS`\ �._.._ 7 C f �� .4 •t� y E � r � a.. •i; t4 � f�,+, .r ,t, ;t 1+.1• ',.r` �:•r'`x.'s, r ,att� i t S ;. �J:`� Y r ti t { :,�, .a� s:�"", tr t`€�c•'. k ,;' � °��4 x.,�"`t ' zav';`I ra S ._-:v�3•, aD,t?..r,»A .�,. + Y�.! _ ! . a •1 R t `" _, a.e.,' �'�k X 9 r.- r d 'att ( u. „ t ' '.r� <4�A �! a t k"ev •. y"'` R w' rt t �y' r _T - ;1 ,: 'i{}\ -s i r � (\� 1 ( .t:: �'� ! - k �;� ,a � nx�'{�. �rp '�' f•n-:o- Y ••fi ar� y `a aq :� t! C {,a,•. ., 11 , ! ' � » t � ., � e Cw.'tr�?,_., :.,,;.• 4 z�F'�, )"/ Y,�};E } ,,r , Y: e {_,; � �''- " p ,,.y;•�y � ,t< R.}� `, J'� S. ,,f w,+' � „ • ; Yft a tt,. + ` '.R "`a. x- oi+?i:`w.'. f l 1 �'•+ is ,q{ `� 'S: K 'e< + t �y„ ate,. it,rr,'',` .# 1 +; tF , t •� MAIM h € 1 T^ _ � - v � ?,� Ise• ji at,d, � ,•�. ;?•✓^� � F taFy 1 1� -cc R � c4,-• ' �.;' �'t.ii',t" r ...t � •�# +t - r ,�..�.. 1 � vl:.' r 7t+•�„ � ."SonY f ..� } S� Y,� y. :.3+ £�t� r`'r$.'f` �t�`\-• - +. - . �\ ,, � .' `,: .,,I ', + ;y H,,a° a� � tuft '' r.. �, •,i t"° •'w` "" :F ,y;' n' e^^�„' ,. _ \l =. ,- ... ., r x. ...> .'' .di t;.x• ... ':•7 ''A ,�.r' -,�: '""-,�' +y},Y"4.., ,u-+t v}t„� �>,,,. .rY � r- - - er _.:, ,;. ,. •.'..,. „'S.*�: :� '.t., a,i$' .rwi c\y x "^,'+F X�'.�'"''t'-y 7. ';.?� �r two �Y,4w`` ,t q",N �� �i. I n< yz xr ,t C .,;.r ., ,y:- t. i• -*, ,"`- ,.,.,;•• t.:. &_:. t ,,:x � s~ r t -a %~ , x.'•.t e;. S .h" ,?t• t,T• „t{t . .•., fit y i t; w'er ,� .rva + i t t 7 _ ;•, �y+x '�-r.a'y,k £' ,^S •5 �'� 1' y�g 4 4,C� ,r, � S a� 1 - 1 Aw '?n - ',:, `` .x P. x,:': 1 +�''..;:' .., y<'S .✓, t'' :$. rs ;`d i 'af�","] F; ,y •k,.. � tr';•�it� �t- ' ' � r !, .• - \ _ .. � "'� c , !�'" y k < 1 i- ,* _ k Y r�vy.43r¢ 4tC' {`. q':�x Y �'� t' .. - .. '• ttt ,: t '\ ,' �' L,'S 1t a LA Vol ^y•,^*,j l ' ,i! -• ^''• i � v: .4, >41.. ,n .t.. ,d' �„r y } i t�.+1. - d + 1•.x t "SS•j:. ,. s�: �Sf�t".. � _ ., - Qfik ,. '$'r'il\[. • .+Y .. fi�Lam,, r nY.' -.:.. ..2- ♦ ,.:" v 1.'• ,. ', n6, l i< _ '{' h 1� Nr t .. 'y •' .• Yc y s,S�'E,�'rr i S a,uf�' •�tY• ter.a':t # .: r.:.` ..•n, •e^ > r':.,�* n* _ r$�: �,�:, _ a, . }.". < s � .,�•L. �� irrfi: °�' x. f.:- ,r��'r � _drns� ! �-. '�' -,n 4s tit t (S exxr kt ,Z.n ysaw art" ah �",` - -... .,� t cd* .:�'v, ." _�, .�''� S?h� `,�'.r{ ,,f,'3�::: w•. ;' r �'�-� s'q s.'�.` �,;,1,,<.�TIw},,,t y° � h �� .y, 1„r:v�"- .. r c •^ "h}„-t•- i,u i'�..., t ?%. ?'" ai`.{`t,,,w *°.a;'T5' 'r`=3w, 'a'i -r.:' j o G *� , :.:`�' w '• A,`.A �4u.�r °3u.., 'sr *r` i�?ti+`�>�d�fish r 4. :C,r� 'r*. Hd�•�'�. t _ - + 1 t I.i,7 ,q,; '£"s .+%� ..�:' ,�, t ,� ``ice ti•xc,,:', a L ,.i?[t{�s ,;h r 4..:.:�,.s r -�„'s, H;y�N•rw:T � ffli r><in? 5��� ,..,� .. l .. .., '+" >:�-: na R» ,.�'v:ti ::Tr;v ,rr, ':'Yrep >��^-& �"'`� t wt cf1-,t•t++�TF ,�,.�•� "ek`c'°.'�"'o-,.-� "t ��w �` a:' '�',�'`�i.Y�•i/,�"'��F► a.t 5��,Zt � a ,: �r'z;�c;^• "} "�"'t '�'",.s'� ,. n / c. .;: 12.a x. . w' - '1 our t, li . ': � .•{• •{x„ ..:' t F'}� ,S r v� , .. P ,.:. -�Fn .,. t._:k ,i irk.. .,�i....E:.Y 'Y � x _Y ,<.., �y5 } rrt` Xr {q• k r-e' sd` C Y'.#p 1 ti'�} ;5�,' t i - 1 / ,}^+.. '� :?,^'r'e. "�•., 5 #. )' .-{St`x,.. r r. t`` "t' t . ��;..eP .v •t �t ,ks �'! r e ,( �..:. ..,r ''•7, � .,ram tW. u, • 4.-- x t �. ly :r �} ; ON coy low Z 1 f 1. .. '�,. f;'• t i t� 't"' Y `.,t 's ram} �''t-i .• z �. \� .r: m R ATA lost ly � 17`7 G C y4 -�l r / 1.-Y :n'vi�,a 1.H..%3_., "..�.-,..=1a k'� -..+.+-..�.._�..�++»�•� -�...vx..�.�.�...�..�...+�s.�_.-r-...a_.���,�r .-- _ �-r'T 72rT-' 4 E hS� M 1 2 3� 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 !13 14, 15 %I