HomeMy WebLinkAboutSaratoga Hills No. 13 Annexation �XATION SARATOGA HILLS N0.13
NTY OF SANTA CLA RA
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
REPOT OF THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Designation SARATOGA HILLS NO. 1 Annex/r1%-XXU to Cupertino Sanitary
District
LAFC Agenda fearing No. 23 1000/. Consent ;t
LAFC Hearing Date 5-5-76 Not 100% Consent
1. REVIEW OF PROPOSAL:
(a) Acreage and location: 2.36 acresisouth of Pierce P.oad, westerly of
paloi,1171no way and east of Pike Road
(b) Effect on ca.-arnunity services:
D_istri. t
x Pro,-ision of all w�njcxpat services.
Municipal services not provided as follows:
Drtaclurent from:
(c) Bo::ndaries :
X Definite and certain.
Indefinite and uncertain.
N/A Conform to Urban Service Area.
Do not conform to Urban Service Area.
NIA Do not create island, corridor or strip.
Create island, corridor, or strip.
NIA Conforms to road policy.
Does not conform to road policy.
X Conforms to lines of assessment.
Splits lilies of assessment as follows :
(d) impact on School District : none
(e) Present land use: vacant land, residential
(f) Proposed land use: .residential.
2. SUGGEESTED CONDITIO".1S OR OnIER C01f"1ENTS: Neca.tive Declaration (C.on4
attached) filed with County Clerk 4-26-76. District requests I.�". : C
apply conditions outlined in Exhibit "C" of petition .
3. PROTESTS:
4. R.Ef'O:-us ir,,N111:TI0N 1 , Confirrii Negative Declaration.
2. Authorize Cupertino Sanitary District Bodr= :,f
Directors to proceed without notice or hcari.n-T,
subject to conditions outlined in Exhibit "C"
_ of petition.
SUBMITTED : w. CA.MPEN, Executive Officer
by - Date 4--27-76
LaMOIILca, 13951 pierce
Local Age ncy aFina 3t'cn Cornrniss:on
Counly
.. TO West Fieddinq St-eat.
County of Santa Clara _ San Jose, Area
�s1,^
299-2:^a Area Code -�;3
Caluornia
E�n'I RO'7"!ENTAL CLEARA��CE I2F:C0?�
PROPOSAL DESIGNATION Saratoxa hills No. 13 APPLICANTCupertino
DESC-RIPTInti Annexation of 2.36 acres; south of Pierce Rd, westerly of Palomino 'pia; arj -_
of Pike Rd. to provide sanitarr sewer service to one existing home and one planned
DETF.F'-IINATTONs ingle-family home.
1. Is proposal a project? YES
if no, proposal is cleared for processing.
If yes, complete #2
2. Is LAFCO Lead Agency? YES
If no, Lead Agency Statemant included with application, along with
appropriate environ-mental documents.
If yes; ^omplete F..nvironmantal Assessment below.
3. Project 'nvirormental. Data complete YES
Project exempt NO (ENDORSED)
Environmental Assessment complete YES
Negative Declaration complete �' d
Final Environmental. Impact Report
dQHN KAZUEOW' ., Clark
Project Environmental Data NOT COMPLETE BY N. MQ Ate! e Deputy
�� f A Y
Require:
S 1-11r1?S
PTegat•-iva Declaration Issued 4/?6/76 Draft EIR complex:%d
Final. £I R completed
E�JV!,RO VENT-7\ , ASSESS_IMIENNT: Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:
�~ Com-mun i t;7
Physical Resources Cultural Resources Facilities
Vegetation +` H15toric se •j`'ge ---
wildlife Archeological Water
Water Visual Aesthetic Police
Aix Local Community Plans Fire
Noise Displacement (Housing) Circulation
Geologic Employment,Business Schools
Misc. Hazards Other Community
Services
Staff Conclusion: Annexation to the Sanitary District and subsequent connection to a.
sanitary -;e-,er line will have a beneficial environmental impact ih that the potential
for p•round water contamination from ecutic tank failure will be reduced and Public
health safet:-r rill be increased. There may be a sli.Fht growth inducing :impact fro:::
extens;on of the Sanitary District Boundaries into the other portion of the surrounc,--n
foothills,'-=hicn may induce a(Witional lots to devlope. Staff accordingly is ues this
annexation apzlicateon a negative declaration.
S i C E1) l_ ..:�r r,ty t.'-J DATEApril ?6, 1976 --