Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDolores Avenue 88-13 Annexation tM8 XATION DOLORES AVENUE 88-13 =c recc: i t';? :t =e Y'' -., r- f; n• J 0 6 L 6 2 j- 7 } ••.•t . Co;e sec. County of Santa Clara f _ California APR =J b Lora.'A9Mey FWM21110n Conwnbobn - Counry Govommenl C-anler Eas+ Wing - 70 Want Maoo"np Strop Sl', san Jolt Ca"IC—O 9!>>0 399-a371 Anna Coo@ AM - CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION 1 , Sally C . Logothetti , the Assistant Executive Officer of the Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission , issue this Certificate of Completion pursuant to Sections 57200 and 57201 of the Government Code . I hereby certify that I have examined the resolution for a change in organization/M &tt^ched bereto and bave found this docu- ment to be in compliance with Section 56626 of the Government Code a•,;t�,orizing .cities within the County of Santa Clara to assume author- ity over certain changes in government organization. The name of the City is : Cupertino The entire City is located in Santa Clara County . The change of organization completed is an annexation A map an-i description of the boundaries of the change of organization Is appended hereto . The title of this proceeding is : DOLORES AVENUE 88-13 (uninhabited ) . The change of organization vas ordered subject to the folloving terms and conditions : None. The date of adoption of the City resolution ordering the change of organization/ is March 20. 1939 Dated April 4, 1989 sist nt Exec ive Offi r Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission Att : City Resolution Map Legal Description An Equal Opponunity Employor COu °y Of Sang Clara �,- ,,:��� l ; Department of 1'I<unnin};and t>c•vcIoplyxciit Off(c�tit the Cc�ul�ty Silr�'t }'(tr c'�funt� G„�'t'nunt•rn t t'nu•t,t..t51\�in}, � �� �.,' —r)A1 i it't!c!iTl SIH t't �' January 31 ,1989 Dorothy Cornelius, City Clerk City of Cupertino P.O.Bux 580 Cupertino, CA 95015 The attached map and description of territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Cupertino entitled DOLORES AVENUE 88-13 is in accordance with Government Code Section 56826. The boundaries of said territory are definite and certain. The proposal is in compliance with the Commission's road annexation policies. JAMES F. SIRR, Manager/County Surveyor by �� M. D. Marcott, Deputy Attachment cc: LAFCO Executive Officer (w/attachment) Lavenia Millar, Public Works Board ol.*.-i1 'rvisors:�u,.ntn, \\11'-un /I w t r)tt t'n 117utri,I,I I t;gon.Itt (!1)m(1,Itt.Ul,utnr\k ht•nn.t Coons% EXCU110iYl':ti.tii R Itt't(I T ' � 1 mQ W = Ns A1. I d OL N •h � D0L0 E� � W W S1TF- i yet„L.ELLAN Rp• trt) -� LO( AT!ON_ SCALE' 1"= 1000' SC.At.� : C=100' J y _1 71. 17 dim zo OM r t� tJ Pt�O -C--c-D °O G� S� pp�3�p " tiYi2NE A , ® L©7 4154 i I.►1 ' Ino•�� 7 LP i P® PROP©s�� �NNEXA�['lOf�l -TO THE 617Y OF GUPEF<T "\� o DE�����R- ► A per. 40 DOLORES AVENUE 88-13 (FUNK) ALL that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara State of California, more particularly described as follows: All of Lot 154 and a portion of Dolores Avenue as shown upon the Map of Subdivision "A" Monta Vista, which Map was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara in Volume "P" of Maps, Page 20, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 154 as shown on said subdivision: Thence from said point of beginning North 130.82 feet along the westerly boundary of said Lot 154 and it's Northerly prolongation to a point on the Northerly sideline of Dolores Avenue said point also being on the Easterly boundary of that certain proposed annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Byrne Avenue 88-11". Thence East 400.60 feet along the Northerly sideline of Dolores Avenue to a point on the Westerly boundary of that certain Annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Dolores Avenue 82-021: Thence South 40.00 feet along the Westerly boundary of said annexation "Dolores Avenue 82-02" to a point on the Southerly sideline of Dolores Avenue: Thence West 200.30 feet along the Southerly sideline of Dolores Avenue: Thence South 16.00 feet: Thence West 100.15 feet along the Southerly sideline of Dolores Avenue: Thence South 80.82 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 154. Thence West 100.15 feet along the Southerly boundary of said Lot 154 to the Point of Beginning. Containing: 0.60 Acres more or less .I.P.N. 357-14-16 REVISED 1-13-89 DOLORES AVENUE 88-13 (FUNK) ALL that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara State of California, more particularly described as follows: All of Lot 154 and a portion of Dolores Avenue as shown upon the Map of Subdivision "A" Monta Vista, which Map was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara in Volume "P" of Maps, Page 20, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 154 as shown on said subdivision: Thence from said point of beginning North 130.82 feet along the westerly boundary of said Lot 154 and it's Northerly prolongation to a point on the Northerly sidelinr of Dolores Avenue said point also being on the Easterly boundary, of that certain proposed annexation to the City of Cuperti.n- :-.C'.itled "Byrne Avenue 88-11". Thence East 400.60 feet along the Northerly sideline of Dolores Avenue to a point on the Westerly boundary of that certain Annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Dolores Avenue 82-02^. Thence South 40.00 feet along the Westerly boundary of said annexation "Dolores Avenue 82-02" to a point on the Southerly sideline of Dolores Avenue. Thence West 200.30 feet along the Southerly sideline of Dolores Avenue: Thence South 10.00 feet: Thence West 100.15 feec along the Southerly sideline of Dolores Avenue: Thence South 80.82 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 154. Thence West 100.15 feet along the Southerly boundary of said Lot 154 to the Point of Beginning. Containing: 0.60 Acres more or less A.P.N. 357-14-16 REVISED 1-13-89 Z ALGA R d p UOLO RES O t\' tf� 1 SITE ,. M6GLELl-_AN RD. L0 SCALE : I"=ioo, LOCATION MAP SLALE: I" " 1000' J � 1 r�.04�0EG `r t O U t'>=R'T I t--10 G l SY L-{M 1'f`:� �3Y 4 00• o � � s ' i pOLOE P�Y�t:p t3YRNE AVE.88-11 00.15 _t LOT I54 ,� ;�- ��QtJTi� 10.00 0-IWAG0 o 7 p. . w Up PD.�3. w - R.EV I I� PROPOSED ANNtX4T1ON TO THE ITY OF CI- U PF-.F<T 11,-1 CO ENT 1 TLEL �DL VEN UE DEEMt3EFz , 19SS A 5-1 4 - 11v 1 ' Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission Ph. : (408) 299-4321 County Government Center - 10th Floor., East Wing 70 West Hedding Street San Jose. CA 95110 PETITION for proceedings pursuant to the CORTESE-KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985 The undersigned hereby petition(s) the Local Agency Formation Commission of Santa Clara County for approval of a proposed change of organization or reorganization, and stipulate(s) as follows: 1. This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the California Government Code (commencing with Section 56000, Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985) . 2. The proposed change of organization or reorganization is designated as: and consists of: consolidation of special districts formation of new special district incorporation annexation to _ detachment from t (name City/District) of : (number of) acres on the (n/s/e/w) side of ! (Street/Avenue) between (Street/Avenue) and (Street/Avenue) ; and (if applicable) annexation _ detachment of the same to/from (name City(ies)/District(s) ) 3 . A metes and bounds description of the exterior boundaries of the terri- tory(ies) included in the proposal , marked Exhibit A. and a map of said territory(ies) , marked Exhibit B. are attached to this petition and by this reference incorporated herein. 4 . The territory to be organized/reorganized is: _ inhabited. ( "inhabited" = 12 or more registered voters) ^ uninhabited . 5 . This proposal is consistent with the Sphere of Influence of the is not affected city and/or district(s) . 6 . The reasons(s) for the proposed __;, t. = f�° (annexation, detach- mentT reo-rganization-,--et•a.. ) is/are: 7 . It is desired that the proposed change of organization or reorganization be made subject to the following terms and conditions: 8 . The person(s) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one) : owner (s) of land within the affected territory. registered voter(s) within the affected territory. 9 . The undersigned proponent(s) _ do own 100% of the territory pro- do not posed for change of organiza- tion or reorganization. LrFCO: Petition -2- 10. If the formation of new district(s) is included i:, the proposal , the principal act(s) under which said district(s) is/are proposed to be formed is/are: 11 . If an incorporation is included in the proposal, provisions are re- quested for appointment of : — City Manager City Clerk and City Treasurer Wherefore. petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in accordance with the provisions of Section 56000 et seq . of the Government Code and herewith affix signature(s) as follows: CHIEF PETITIONERS (not to exceed three) Signatures of Petitioners (Please print Assessor ' s Election name below Street Address Parcel or Precinct Date signature . ) City/State/Zip No. * __. No . ** Phone: Phone: i+ Phone: * - For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for landowner- initiated proposals . ** - For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident-voter initiated proposals . Rev. 1/l/86 Santa Clara County LAFCO Ph. : (408 ) 299-4321 - Secly County Government Center - 10th F1 . , E. Wing (408 ) 299-4716 Exec . 70 West Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110 Officer SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted , in original and 5 copies, with any petition or resolution of application to LAFCO for a change of organization (annexation or detachment) or reorgani- zation (multiple annexations and/or detachments) made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code Sec . 56000 et seq . ) PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: Annexation ) Detachingnt )to/from Reorganization) (City or Spec.District) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL as Lead Agency for environmental review (Name of City/District) of the project, has already (prezoned? other approval action? ) the territory on and in compliance with CEQA, has : (date) determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from pro- visions of CEQA pursuant to Ca1 .Adm.Code Sk7 (cite class exemption section) . completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. completed a Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. LAFCO is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the pro- ject and the completed Environmental Information Form required by LAFCO environmental assessment staff is attached to this applica- tion. tEnvironmental staff phone: (408) 299-2521. ) Proposal is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal . Adm. Code Sec . _ because CHARACTERISTICS 01 THE AREA 1 . Number of acres 2 . Number of inhabitants I 3 . Number of registered voters 4 . Number of dwelling units 5 , a . What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific) : b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are under contract with the County under provisions of the Williamson Act . c. What steps , if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken to release the above parcel (s) from the contract? FILING DEADLINE: 5 :00 p.m. on the first Wednesday of the month, for LAFCO hearing on the second Wednesday of the following month. 6 . a . For city annexations, what is the prezoning that has been applied by the city to the affected area (Note: Prezoning is a LAFCO fil- ing requirement for city annexations) : b. Does the applicant intend to propose a change in this zoning if and when the territory is annexed to the city? YES NO If YES, indicate the new zoning which will be sought. 7 . For city or district annexations, describe the development being pro- posed for the territory, if any, and when this development is ex- pected to begin. 8 . Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of assessment and ownership? YES NO If NO, please explain the reason for non-conformity and provide justification for LAFCO' s approving the boundary change7 as proposed: 9. Do the bounda.iss of any proposed city annexation create an island, corridor or skip of unincorporated territory? YES NO If YES, answer the following questions: a . Number of acres in the island, corridor or strip? ( If more than one island is being created, indicate the acreage of each island . ) r . Number of inhabitants? c . Assessed value? d . Land use and zoning in island, corridor or strip? e . Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island : f . Does the proponent request waiver of restriction agains- creation of an island? YES NO If YES, explain why creation of an island is justified. SERVICES 10. Is the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/r-e'org�&nizaticn in the City or District ' s urban service area? YES NO 11. If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development be permitted without community sewage discharging into an existing sanitary sewer system and disposal plant? YES NO ! If YES, what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal? 12 . Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the construc- tion of any public improvements to the affected territory be financed by the formation of a special assessment district? YES NO If YES, describe service(s) or improvement(s) and the average cost per resident/landowner of the district . Service/improvement : Cost : $�/yr . for yrs . $ /yr . for _ yrs . Sur)nl . Anal . - 2 13 . List all cities, special districts, (including school districts) and County Service Areas located within the area of this proposal . (Ex- clude Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco Ray Area Air Pollution Control District, County Library Zone, and Water Importa- tion. ) (Refer to County Tax Rate Code Rook for this information) : For changes in organization of Discricts, list all cities within 3 miles of the subject territory: 14 . For city annexations, list those concurrent or future detachments from Special Districts wnich are proposed for this territory. t LANDOWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS 15 . Please provide the information requested below: a . Owners of land* within the proposed annexation/dotachment/reor- ganizatten who consent to this proposal should show their consent by signing and printing or typing their names and addresses, with date, below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated by property-owner petition; put "see petition" below and type or print in names , addresses, etc. ) Assessor ' s parcel number, assessed land (not improvements) valuation, and, if 100% property-owner consent has been obtained, certification by City/ District Clerk, must be added prior to filing. Hearing not re- quired if 100% property owner consent is obtained. Assessed Signature Street Address/ Parcel Value of Date (Print name below) City/State/Zip Te1 .No. No. Land ( If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet & attach. ) * "Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last Equalized Assessment Roll; where such person is no longer the owner, then any person entitled to be shown as owner of land on the next Assessment Roll ; where land is subject to a recorded written agree- ment of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser, and any public agency owning land . " Government Code Section 56048 . CERTIFICATE OF CITY/DLSTR-I-CT CLERK (Required for 100% Consent Proposal) I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property located within the annexation/d:etachm"t/r"rgani-z'at,,!,on proposed by this applica- tion and that the (number) signatures above represent all of the owners of property included in this proposal . I FURTFER CERTIFY that, pursuant to Government Code Section 56839, the CitylDistaict waives the requirement for written notice and gives consent for the Commission to make determinations on this proposal without notice or hearing. Date : City/District Clerk (Seal ) City/District of Suppl . Appl . -3 b. Owners of land within the proposed annexation/detachment/reor- ganization who do not z-nsent to this proposal should be listed by name, address, parcel number and assessed land valuation below. Signatures and dates not required. Hearing will be held for less-than-100%-consent applications. Assessed Street Address Parcel Value of Name City/State/Zip No. Land (If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet & attach. ) c. FOR NOT-100%-CONSENT PROPOSALS, list all registered voters resid- ing in the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorgani- zation if different from the landowners shown in 15a . and 1.5b. above. Street Address Street Address Name City/State/Zip Name City/State/ZiP ( If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach) 16 . Print or type the name and address of officers or persons , not to exceed three in number, who are to receive copies of the Executive Officer ' s Report and mailed Notice of Hearing (in addition to the Clerk/Administrator of each affected city or district): Street Address Name City/State/Zip (j ) (2) (3 ) 17 . I hereby certify that all LAFCO filing requirements will be met and that the statements made in this application are to the best of my knowledge accurate. (Print name of person complet- ing this application) (Address) (Signature) (Date) NOTE: It is a general LAFCO filing requirement that a copy of this appli- cation be filed with each school district shown on question *13 of this document if the proposal involves ultimate new residential development of five acres or more . It is the applicant ' s responsibility to submit this information to the appropriate school district(s) and the signature above is considered verification that this filing requirement has been met. Suppl . Appl . - 4 Santa Clara County LAFCO Ph. : (408) 299-4321 - Sec 'y county Government Center - 10th F1 . , E. Wing (408) 299-4716 - Exec . 70 West Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110 Officer SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted, in original and 5 copies , with any petition or resolution of application to LAFCO for a change of organization (annexation or detachment) or reorgani- zation (multiple annexations and/or detachments) made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code Sec. 56000 et seq . ) PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: DOLORES AVE. 88-13 Annexation ) N)tWK Kt )to THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RRX=X J=)=ji VW (C i t.y or Spec .District) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL X THE CITY OF C_UPERTINO _ 4u Lead Agency for environmental review (Name of City/%t4X9cg1tAMX of the project, has already PREZONED (prezoned? other approval action?) the territory on JUNE 4, 1984 and in compliance with CEQA, has : (date) determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from pro- visions of CEQA pursuant to Cal .Adm.Code Sec. (cite class exemption section) . X completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. completed a Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. LAFCO is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the pro- ject and the completed Environmental Information Form required by LAFCO environmental assessment staff is attached to this applica- tion. (Environmental staff phone: (408) 299-2521. ) Proposal is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal . Adm. Code Sec . because CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA 1. Number of acres 0.60 2 . Number of inhabitants 2 3 . Number of registered voters 2 4 . Number of dwelling units 1 5 . a . What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific) : RESIDENCE b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are under contract with the County under provisions of the Williamson Act : N/A c. What steps , if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken to release the above parcel (s) from the contract? N !A FILING DEADLINE: 5 :00 p.m. on the first Wednesday of the month, for LAFCO hearing on the second Wednesday of the following month. LAFCO: Petition -2- 10. If the formation of new district(s) is included in the proposal , the principal act(s) under which said district(s) is/are proposed to be formed is/ate: N/A 11 . If an incorporation is included in the proposal , provisions are re- quested for appointment of : City Manager City Clerk and City Treasurer Wherefore, petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in accordance with the provisions of Section 56000 et seq. of the Government Code and herewith affix signature(s) as follows : CHIEF PETITIONERS (not to exceed three) Signatures of Petitioners (Please print Assessor ' s Election name below Street Address Parcel or Precinct Date signature,,) City/State/Zip No. * No. ** 357-14-16 Phone: Phone: ( ) Phone. * - For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for landowner- initiated proposals. ** - For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident-voter initiated proposals . Rev. 1/1/86 Santa Clara County LAFCO Ph. : (408 ) 299-4321 - Sec 'y county Government Center - 10th Fl . , E. Wing (408) 299-4716 - Exec. 70 West Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110 Officer SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted, in original and 5 copies, with any petition or resolution of application to LAFCO for a change of organization (annexation or detachment) or reorgani- zation (multiple annexations and/or detachments) made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code Sec. 56000 et seq . ) PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: DOLORES AVE. 88-13 Annexation ) 0My9WKbWft )to/qwww THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RRX=1At 1!XW (City or Spec.District) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL X THE CITY OF CUPERTINO as Lead Agency for environmental review (Name of City/DQ IM)O C of the project, has already PREZONED (prezoned? other approval action?) the territory on JUNE 4, 1984 and in compliance with CEQA, has : (date) determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from pro- visions of CEQA pursuant to Cal .Adm.Code Sec. (cite class exemption section) . x completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. completed a Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. LAFCO is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the pro- ject and the completed Environmental Information Form required by LAFCO environmental assessment staff is attached to this applica- tion. (Environmental staff phone: (408) 299 -2521. ) Proposal is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal . Adm. Code Sec. because CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA 1 . Number of acres 0.30 2 . Number of inhabitants 2 3 . Number of registered voters 2 4 . Number of dwelling units 1 5 . a . What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific) : RESIDENCE b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are under contract with the County under provisions of the Williamson Act : N/A C. What steps . if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken to release the above parcel (s) from the contract? N /A FILING DEADLINE: 5 :00 p.m. on the first Wednesday of the month, for LAFCO hearing on the second Wednesday of the following month. 6 . a . For city annexations, what is the prezoning that has been applied by the city to the affected area (Note: Prezoning is a LAFCO fil- ing requirement for city annexations) : R-1 7.5 b. Does the applicant intend to propose a change in this zoning if and when the territory is annexed to the city? YES NO If YES, indicate the new zoning which will be sought. 7 . For city or district annexations, describe the development being pro- posed for the territory, if any, and when this development is ex- pected to begin. NEW HOUSE - 1989 8 . Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of assessment and ownership? YES X NO If NO, please explain the reason for non-conformity and provide justification for LAFCO' s approving the boundary change as proposed: 9 . Do the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island, corridor or strip of unincorporated territory? YES NO x If YES, answer the follcwing questions: a . Number of acres in the island, corridor or strip? ( If more than one island is being created, indicate the acreage of each island . ) r . number of inhabitants? c . Assessed value? d . Land use and zoning in island, corridor or strip? e . Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island: f . Does the proponent request waiver of restriction against creation of an islanu? YES NO If YES, explain why creation of an island is justified . SERVICES 10. Is the territory proposed for annexation/ 14MIMMUM in the City or District ' s urban service area? YES _ x NO 11 . If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development be permitted without community sewage discharging into an existing sanitary sewer system and disposal plant? YES NO _x___ If YES, what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal? 12 . Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the const.ruc- tion of any public improvements to the affected territory be financed by the formation of a special assessment district? YES NO X If YES. describe services) or improvement (s) and the average cost per resident/landowner of the district . Service/improvement : Cost : $ /yr . for yrs . $ /yr . for yr:... Suonl . Anal . - 2 13 . List all cities, special districts, (including school districts) and County Service Areas located within the area of this proposal . (Ex- clude Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco Bay Area Air Pollution Control District, County Library Zone. and Water Importa- tion. ) (Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this information) : Cupertino Elementary School District Cupertino Sanitary Dsitrict Fremont High School District Mid Peninsula Open Space District Foothill Community College District _ For changes in ofganizati-on of Districts, list all cities within 3 miles of the subject territory: N/A 14 . For city annexations, list those concurrent or future detachments from Special Districts which are proposed for this territory. /A LANDOWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS 15 . Please provide the information requested below: a . Owners of land* within the proposed annexation/detachment/reor- ganization who consent to this proposal should show their consent. by signing and printing or typing their names and addresses. with date. below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated by property-owner petition; put "see petition" below and type or print in naves, addresses. etc. ) Assessor ' s parcel number , assessed land (not improvements) valuation, and. i.f 100% property-owner consent has been obtained, certification by City/ District Clerk, must be added prior to filing. Hearing not re- quired if 100% property owner consent is obtained. Assessed Signature Street Address/ Parcel Value of Date (Print name below) City/State/Zip Tel .No. No. Land Situs A.P,N, "SEE PETITION" 21920 Dolores _ SZ-IA- I L 0-539 Cupertino. CA 95014 ( If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet & attach. ) * "Owner of, land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last Equalized Assessment Roll; where such person is no longer the owner, then any person entitled to be shown as owner of land on the next Assessment Roll ; where land is subject to a recorded written agree- ment of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser , and any public agency owning land . " Government Code Section 56048 . CERTIFICATE OF CITY/ = CLERK (Rea, * red for 100% Consent Proposal) I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property located within the annexation/Xd WLV&Uxc proposed by this applica- tion and that the __L (number) signatures above represent all of the owners of property included in this proposal . I FURTHER CERTIFY that, pursuant to Government Code Section 56839, the City/DAXNKKI }C waives the requirement for written notice and gives consent for the Commission to make determinations on this proposal without notice or hearing. Date: City/ ZX1a Clerk ' (Seal ) City/nOMMM of Suppl . Appl . -3 's • b. Owners of land within the proposed annexation/detachment/reor- ganization who do not consent to this proposal should be listed by name, address, parcel number and assessed land valuation below. Signatures and dates not required. Hearing will be held for less-than-100%-consent applications. Assessed Street Address Parcel Value of Name City/State/Zip No. Land ( If additional space required. continue list on separate sheet & attach. ) c . FOR NOT-l00%-CONSENT PROPOSALS, list all registered voters resid- ing in the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorgani- zation if different from the landowners shown in 15a . and 15b. above. Street Address Street Address Name — City/State/Zip Name City/State/Zip ( If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach) 16 . Print or type the name and address of officers or persons, not to exceed three in number, who are to receive copies of the Executive Officer ' s Report and mailed Notice of Hearing ( in addition to the Clerk/Administrator of each affected city or district): Street Address Name City/State/Zip ( 1 ) (2 } (3) 17 . I hereby certify that all LAFCO filing requirements will be met and that the statements made in this application are to the best of my knowledge accurate. TRAVICE WHITTEN 10300 TORRE AVE. W" (Print name of person complet- CUPERTINO, CA 95014 fU� ing this application) (Address) (Signatur ) (Date NOTE: It is a general LAFCO filing requirement that a copy of this appli- cation be filed with each school district shown on question #13 of this document if the proposal involves ultimate new residential development of five acres or more . It is the applicant ' s responsibility to submit this information to the appropriate school district(s) and the signature above is considered verification that this filing requirement has been met. Suppl . Appl . - 4 Initial Study City of Cupertino Environmental Assessment Procedures E. A. File Number(s) 4-EA-84 Application File Numbers) 1-Z-84 Date February 27, 1984 The California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, requires public agencies to evaluate public and private projects to determine their pntentrial impact on the environment. \. This worksheet is intended to provide guidance for both you, the applicant, and City officials in assessing a proposed project to determine whether it may or may not have a significant impact on the environment. If, based upon the information provided' below, the City makes a determination that your project may have a significant impact on the environment, you still be required to prepare an Environmental Impact Report as provided by State law and the City of Cupertino's Environmental Assessment requirements. Detailed information regarding the environmental assessment procedure is avail- able from the Director of Planning and Development. Part I Information to be completed by the Applicant Project Type (Pre)Zoning X Tentative Map L-1 Other F7 Use Permit Variance ED Oftl Monta Vrsta Area generalTy GoundeU by Cranada AVenue to the nnrT' �niperial Location Avenue to the east, McClellan Road to the st th and by the westerly boundary oC the ac eri y Farm MIT Course [u Me wes . .Applicant City of Cupertino Address of Applicant 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 Phone (408) 252-4.505 General Description of Project Prezone and rezone the above areas to zoning districts consistent with the General Plan. The prolvet site contains approximately 97 acres. Rev.7/8/80 -1- Description of Project (cont'd. ) Specific Details of the Project 1. Size of Site NIA 2. Intensity of Development (a) If residential: (1) Number of units per gross acre (2) Residential Unit Schedule: Owner- No. of Size v Estimated Total Rental ship Bedrooms Sq.ft. Sales Price Number Unit Type O1 Unit type 02 I Unit type 03 Unit type 04 Unit type 05 TOTAL (3) Percentage in area of building coverage Percentage in area of recreational open space (4) Parking required Parking proposed (b) If commercial, industrial, or institutional: (1) Building square footage (2) Percentage of building coverage of site (3) Estimate of maximum number of employees per shift (4) Parking required Parking proposed -2- Questions Related to Potential Imoact of Project A. Social/Cultural Impacts : Yes Mavbe No (1) Will the proposed project result in the dis- placement of people? X (2) Will the project alter the employment base of the community? X (3) Will the project alter the housing needs of the community? X (4) Does the proposed project affect a historical or archaelogical site? X ',"ate 1) (Page 4) B. Physical Impacts: (1) Will the project result in a change of a natural body of water, vegetative cover, or land form? X (2) Will the project result in a change in a scenic view or vista from existing residential area or public lands or roads? X (3) Will the project change the development pattern, scale or character of general area of project? X (4) Will the construction and/or operation of the project result in significant amount of solid waste, litter, dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the vicinity? X (S) Will the project result in a change in stream or ground water quality or quantity or altera- tion of existing drainage patterns? X (6) Will the project substantially change existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity? X (1) Is the project site on filled land or on slope of 10Z or greater? w X (8) Does the project involve the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammable or explosive? _ X (9) Is the project a phase of an existing or future larger project or series of projects? X -3- Description of the Environmental Setting Provide the following information on a separate attachment: (1) Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of structures. A plot plan may be required for the description. (2) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any culeasral, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the Lyra of land use (residential, commer- cial, etc.) , intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of devel- opment (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.) . CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor- mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information pre- sented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date (Signature) For �i t-rZ � l�PdJe41 va t.._ (1) The project site is comprised of ea:1stin1r, urban development Including n acre golf course and picnic ground recreation complex. The entire area has general historic value. A few structures ma have greater historical value as separate entities. The recreation complex is located in the 100-year evelit flood plan for Stevens Creek. (2) The project area is bordered by the Old Nonta Vista Commercial District to the north, by the Wert Valley Industrial Park to the east anti by single-farm l y residential neighborlcoclds to the south and West . -4- Part I i Information to be completed by City Officials. A. Primary General Plan Considerations: Yes Mavbe No (1) Is the project in violation of the City of Cupertino's adopted General Plan? x (2) Will the project burden public utilities and services? (a) Fire and police services x (b) Parks and recreation system x (c) Schools x (d) Water system X. (e) Sewer system p; (f) Storm system x (g) Solid waste x (3) Is the project side outside of the Urban Ser- vice Area of the City as defined by Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission? x B. Social/Cultural Impacts: (1) Will the proposed project result in the dis- placement of people? x (2) Will the project alter the employment base of the co=uaity? x (3) Will the project alter the housing needs of the community? x (4) Does the proposed project affect a histori- cal or archaelogical site? x (S) Will the proposed project eliminate an existing recreational use at the project site? (6) Does the proposed project decrease public access to any public body of water or recrea- tional area? x (7) Will the proposed project alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? x .(8) Will the project result in: Yes Mavbe '4o (a) The disturbance of a natural or man—made feature in the project area which is unique? X (b) The obstruction of a .scenic vista open to the public? X C. Physical Impacts: (1) Will the proposed project result in the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? X (2) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? X (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X (d) The destruction, covering or modif ica— cion of any unique geologic or physical feature? X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soil, either on or off the site? X (3) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X (4) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (b) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X (c) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X —6— Yes Macbe No (d) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground water? X (e) Change in the gLantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavation? X M Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X (g) Exposure of people or property to water- related hazards such as flooding or tidal wave. X ($) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X (c) Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X (e) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X (f) Reduction'of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X (g) Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X_ (h) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X (6) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Increase in existing noise levels? X (b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X (7) Does the proposed project significantly affect the potential use extraction or conservation of a scarce natural resource such as agricultural land, a mineral deposit, or woodland? X 4, Yes Mavbe 40 (8) Will the proposed project involve the use, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials? X (9) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X (10) Will the proposed prcc ;eL;t result in: (a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X (c) Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circula- cion or movement of people and/or goods? X (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? r_ X (11) Mandatory Findings of Significance: (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X (b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (a short- cerm impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time, while long-term impacts will endure into the future.) X -8- Yes Mavbe No (c) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect'of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X (d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Disceission of Environmental Evaluation (note: Use additional sheets if necessary.) Determination: On the basis of this initial evaluation, the Environmental Review Committee finds: { That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environ- ment, and therefore recommends the GRANTING OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. r7 That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because of the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. It is recommended that A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HE PREPARED. F-1, That the prc:,osed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIROVKENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date an, Environmental/ Review Committee For -9- CILV of (at}tt•rt itto NI{CAT I VI-: !SIICLAHAT 1ON- Ma y 21 , 1984 A:; l'rt►vitletl by tht• Isrsvirmimetilal Asa;rs:::ultn1 I'r114-t•tlot't•, Idoptctl by Iltt• Cily Comwil '►f sFtr City of CIII)c•rt ino tin Matt-b 71, 1971 , as: antsntlt 'V , the 11111ow1nS, tlt•s;rr ibed }tt•o jet•t wits grant ell n Ne};:tt ivt• Iit•r l arat iun by the City Collar i I of the laity of Culserl inn on Mav 21 , 19811 . I'rt' jt rl Itt_s.rr il'I it'll :u►tl I.orrtl ioll A►t}tl iral ioo 4-1-A-81t A}tltl (rant : Ci1 Y ttl Cttl't•rt iot' (t11'1 Montt Vi!;la :11ca) I.ticat !on: Ct•ner:t I I v bountic•d by Cranada Aveiltiv 14, t he mirth, Imlu•t- !al Avenue to [ lit, vost . M11'1 t•1 last► Roatl l o I be t:oul It :still by [ Ile wt Its ly ht'ut►tl II-y of 11tt• lil:;vkhrrry Nat tit Co l f Cott -'e Ili t be we:;l . Di!;vt-et iun_ary Art ion kt tlnt :;l : I'rer.otit• :uul rtrunt al►proximalvIv 91 nrre:; within lltt• lilt! Monla Vir;ta area to RI -tt (Res;i(lc•nt ial Siligit!-fam! Iv) , VI -7.�i (Res idi•nI la SIlt},IC.-fall)ilv) . 1' (P1:tnnt•cl Dovelolttnc•ot wiLit a ICep;i'It•nl i;t1 it .it- 12 clwe1 I in}•, isms Iwr I,ros;s; V (I'I rtnntvl I)t•vt•1 oltutt•t►1 w!1 It .1 ilea;itlent in I h .h-7.7 dwe I I i nr. till i l lit t' y;ros:s; ar 1-4 Develottuu•t►I wi111 I, l):Its Intln:;I I- ia1 anti Rrs: idvilI lal ) . P (PI:tnnetl Ist•vt•It'l'nunI wiIIt A),rlrttllure/Rrrrt•al tonal ) , :uttl !►t? (I'ub I it- I►tt i Ili i uy;) 73111 i rn, tl i S1 r !r l s:. t:intl in}::;_','- 11e', i�,iosut►alcin}�, hotly- 'fbc• C i L y Cotntt i ! I"rallO'd a Nog.-il i ve Dvc I:tral iI," :;i IWV I lit' l'rt' jt•r t i:: ron:: i::1 rnt wiIIt the Cent,I.,I an anti Ilan; no s; il;nil irnstl etivirt:nutrnl ;tI iuytarlx. Janit ti li. S i ilk _ I'I;Itill 1 tit: IS i rt•r•1 or This is to certify that the above Negative. Declaration was filed In the office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on May 221 1984. eputy �CityClerk4 of the ir.swed mortgage and secured by said 1dwuauie aid tl)to any such uctuun or proceedutg ness created subsequent to Date of Policy,except insured,mortgage at the time of acquisition of such in effecting settlement, securing evidence,obtain- as to amounts advanced to protect the Dien of the estate or interest in the land;or ing Witnesses, or prosecuting or defending such insured mortgage and secured thereby. SCHEDULE A CLTA Standard Coverage- 1973 Policy No: AY 816547 Order No: 240217 206 000 .00 Amount of Insurance: $ � Date of Pollcy: AP RIL 15 , 1988 at 8:0 0 a.m. 7 30 .4 0 Premium: Y 1. Name of Insured: RHODA FUNK 2. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: RHODA FUNK, a single woman 3. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is a fee. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage, nor against costs, attorneys' fees or expenses, any or all of which arise by reason of the following: PART 1 1, Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing, authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property ar by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or 1aims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, o: claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claiia; (b) reservations or exccYcie-s in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under(a), (b)or (e) are shown by the public records. 6. Any right, title, interest, estate or easement in land beyond the lines of the area specifically described or referred to in Schedule A, or ir, abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways, but nothing in this paragraph %hall modify or limit the extent to which the ordinary right of an abutting owner for access to a physically open street or highway is insured by this policy. Continued s CLTA Suaadard Coverage— 1973 SCHEDULE S(Continued) 7. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part, whether or not shown by the public records at Date of Policy, or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation, whether or not shown by the public records at Date of Policy. 8. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records. 9. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse cUrns, or other matters(a) whether or not shown by the public records at Date of Policy, but created, caused, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not shown by the public records and not otherwise excluded from coverage but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disr•losed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an i-sured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had been a purchaser or encumbrancer for value without knowledge. PART H A. Currently Assessed Taxes for the fiscal year 1988-1989 a lien, but not yet due or payable . 1 . The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Section 75, et. seq. of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the :state of California. 2 . Right of the public to use as a roadway that portion of the herein described premises lying within the bounds of Dolores Avenue . 3 . Declaration of Restrictions with no express words of forfeiture in the event of violation thereof, but deleting restrictions, if any, based on race, color, religion or national origin, recorded April 18, 1944 in Book 1198 of Official Records, page 276. Said Declaration contains a Mortgagee Protection Clause. f CLTA Standard Coverage — 1973 PART II (Continued) 4. A Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount stated herein Dated : April 6, 1988 Amount : $164,800.00 Trustor : Rhoda Funk, a single woman Trustee : Serrano Reconveyance Company, a California corporation Beneficiary : Home Savings of America, F.A. , a corporation Recorded : April 15, 1988 Instrument No. : 9659726 NOTE: Taxes for the fiscal year 1987-88, have been paid in full SCHEDULE C The land referred to in this policy is situated in the County of Santa Clara St-ite of California. and is described as follows: �- SECTION 154, as laid down, designated and delineated upon that certain Map entitled "Map of Subdivision "A" Monta Vista" , which Map was filed for record in the office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California on April 11, 1917 in Rook "P" of Maps, at page 20. 357-14-016 63079 (A) 357-14-16 yl