HomeMy WebLinkAboutMcClellan Road 88-06 Annexation ANNEXATION MCCLELLAN ROAD 88-06
1988
FE RnIA'1D
nP1 ul
R 77
W
MLGLCit-
51'{�
SCALfE: 1",t00' LJC-�TIOnI t 17
I
I I II I
I �AeT I ,Q I
I Ioo.ly ► ,
0
i?O.P�. F 1 MGvl-f- .LArj 1�0.
Ih-C�,l 1'�'vt'�S>✓() A�-!ti1G�A'f1vrJ
1 'Jf1 CA,)j
\� 'm-(
�� I.,`�GL-EI.I--A�-1 Rom. >'�•o�"
CITY Cuper Lin0
DATE OF FILING 11-18-88
Ordinance or Resolution:
Uninhabited - McClellan Road 88-06
1. Area involved in the ai•aexation? 0.3( (act or square
miles)
2. A. Assessed value (exclusive of all exemptions except the homeowner's and busi-
ness inventory exemptions) of annexed area on the county assessment roll as
of March-1, 198e (see item 4 below)
3 io
B. If est ted how was the estimate derived?
3. A. Assessed value of state-assessed properties (if known).
A/14
B. Is this estimate included in item 2A above't
Yea No
C. If not known, are there any significant state-
assessed properties located in the annexed
area? Yea No
D. If yes, please list the utilities and describe briefly their properties:
4. We would prefer to receive assesses values as of March 1, 1988 rather than
March 1, 1987 Values as of 1987 are acceptable, but some estimate of the
asseseed value changes between the 1987 and 1988 lien dates is needed if there
has been any significant activity in the annexed area between these two dates.
If 1987 data is submitted, please indicate so by correcting the year in item
2A d� provi3e an estimate of value changes here.
r
RETURN TO: Signed
Research and Statistics Divinion
State Board of Equalisation Title
F.O. Box 942879 c Sacramento, CA 94279-0001 Date
_ 991&1(17
:re recur withD.:t :re ' ,
Cc::e Sec. 63C3 F- I �u 'I�16 u P,�
OR RECORD
County of Santa Clara - - A? . .OUFST OF
California /
VOtor.W As~y 0"-fton co-mwan �.� Nov 17 q 03 MIS
Counp Gwemment Cenun Eaei W.np
70 WM+MeOMIg st-1 c
San 1. aS 110 OFF-IC 141 RF;ORpS
299-1321 Arne Cooe.oA SAN'A .,Re ;;!l.NTY
LAUR!E K sr
RECORDER
_ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
I, Sally C. Logothetti, the Assistant Executive Officer of the Santa
Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission, Issue this Certificate
of Completion pursuant to Sections 57200 and 57201 of the Government
Code.
I hereby certify that I have examined the resolution for a change in
organ Izat ion k g -'e�q �3 yr{ attached hereto and have found this docu-
ment to be in compliance with Section 56626 of the Government Code
auttori.zing cities within the County of Santa Clara to assume aut!;or-
ity over certain changes in govern;nent organization.
The name of the City is: Cupertino
The entire City is located in Santa Clara County.
The change of organization completed is an annexation
A map and description of the boundaries of the change of organization
Is appended hereto.
The title of this proceeding is: McCLELLAN- ROAD 88-06 (uninhabited).
The change of organization was ordered subject to the following terms
and conditions:
None.
The date of adoption of the City resolution ordering the change of
organisation tAXn094M4MMVXJMXis October 31, 1988
Dated November 16, 1988 Ak(t C�y �� (,y/
Adsir aut E cutiv officer
Santa Clara County
Local Agency Formation Commission
Art: City Resolution
Map
Legal Description
v An Eduel Opponumty Employer
Ilou"nty of Santa Clara
I)"I�i%n i i ic n i i A Planning and I)c vc i o 1)111 c i I I
'Iffa co(dwcowll�silryt,vor
August 22, 1988
Dorothy Cornelius, City Clerk
City of Cupertino
P.O.Box 580
Cupertino, CA 95015
The attached map and description of territory proposed to be
annexed to the City of Cupertino entitled McQLELLAN ROAD 88-06 is in
accordance with Government Code Section 56826. The boundaries of said
territory are d9finite and certain. The proposal is in compliance with the
Commission's road annexation policies.
JAMES F.SIRR,
Manager/County Surveyor
by
M. D. Marcott, Deputy
Attachment
cc: LAFCO Executive Officer (w/attachment)
Lavenia Millar, Public Works
• hP� FEeNA,J7
J
-ALIAZ R 7
W q
McLLtt1M1
�cnw: 1",I o0' LOGATIon� N1AP
I I �
I 1 I I
I I
Axe<1
IL I L
Lji
II
MCCLELLAN ROAD, 88-06
(MANRAO)
All that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State
of California, more particularly described as: follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 172, as shown on that certain map
entitled, "Map of Subdivision 'a' Monta Vista", which map was filed for
record in the office of the Recorder of the Co•-.%nty of Santa Clara, State
of California, on April 11, 1917, in Book "P" of Maps, at page 20; said
point being along the boundary of that certain annexation to the City of
Cupertino entitled "Howell 76-9",
Thence NORTH, 109.21 feet along the westerly boundary of said Lot 172;
Thence EAST, 50.07 feet along the southerly boundary of Lot 159 of said
aforementioned map;
Thence NORTH, 109.21 feet along the westerly bou„dary of said Lot 159;
Thence EAST, 100.15 feet along the northerly boundary of said Lot 159;
Thence SOUTH, 109.21 feet along the easterly boundary of said Lot 159;
Thence WEST, 25.04 feet along the southerly boundary of said Lot 159;
Thence SOUTH, 109.21 feet along the easterly boundary of said Lot 172
to a point along said annexation "Howell 76-9";
Thence WEST, 25.04 feet along said annexation "Howell 76-9" to the Point
of Beginning.
Containing: 0.31 acres more or less.
APN: 357-14-6,7
Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission Ph.: (408) 299-4321
County Government Center - 10th Floor, East Wing
70 West Heddinq Street
San Jose, CA 95110
PETITION
for proceedings pursuant to the
CORTESE-KNCA LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985
The undersigned hereby petition(s) the Local Agency Formation Commission
of Santa Clara County for approval of a proposed change of organization or
reorganization, and stipulate(s) as follows:
1. This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the
California Government Code (commencing with Section 56000, Cortese-Knox
Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985).
2. The proposed change of organization or reorganization is designated as:
McCLELLAN RD. 88-06
and consists of:
_ consolidation of special districts
formation of new special district
incorporation
:C annexation to THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
detachment from (name City/District)
of 0.31 (number of) acres on the (n/s/e/w)
side of McCLELLAN AVE. (Street/Avenue)
between BYRNE AVE. (Street/Avenue)
and ORANGE AVE. (Street/Avenue)-
and (if applicable) _ annexation
detachment
of the same to/from
(name City(ies)/District(s))
3. A metes and bounds description of the exterior boundaries of the terri-
tory(ies) included in the proposal, marked Exhibit A. and a map of said
territory(ies), marked Exhibit B. are attached to this petition and by
this reference incorporated herein.
4. The territory to be organized/reorganized is: _ inhabited.
("inhabited" = 12 or more registered voters) uninhabited.
5. This proposal X is consistent with the Sphere of Influence of the
is not affected citygxHH1t %1�txQ�1 .
6. The reasons(s) for the proposed ANNEXATION (annexation, detach-
ment, reorganization, etc.) is AWM:
TO PROCURE CITY SERVICES FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
7. It is desired that the proposed change of organization or reorganization
be made subject to the following terms and conditions:
NIA
8. The person(s) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one):
x owner(s) of land within the affected territory.
_ registered voter(s) within the affected territory.
9. The undersigned proponent(s) X do own 100% of the territory pro-
do not posed for change of organiza-
tion or reorganization.
1
LAFCO: Petition -2-
10. If the formation of new district(s) is included in the proposal, the
principal act(s) under which said district(s) is/are proposed to be
formed is/are:
11. If an incorporation is included in the proposal, provisions are re-
quested for appointment of:
_ City Manager
City Clerk and City Treasurer
Wherefore, petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in accordance
with the provisions of Section 56000 et seq. of the Government Code and
herewith affix signatures) as follows:
CHIEF PETITIONERS
(not to exceed three)
Signatures
of Petitioners
(Please print Assessor's Electign
name below Street Address Parcel or Precinct
Date signature.) City/State/Zip No.* No.-
-7 7 58J_-D4N mr'L P.ON 35-7-/4-07
LcS A�7o5 t'h 9/fc72 35-2-
J Phone: 51 b
-- Phone:
Phone:
« - For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for landowner-
initiated proposals.
«* - For proposals involving inhai.ited territory or for resident--voter
initiated proposals.
Rev. l/1/86
Santa Clara County LAFCO Ph_: (408) 299-4321 - Sec'y
r_ounty Government Center - 10th Fl., E. Wing (408) 299-4716 - Exec.
70 West Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110 Officer
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION
FOR
MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY
This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted, in
original and 5 copies, with any petition or resolution of application to
LAFCO for a change of organization (annexation or detachment) or reorgani-
zation (multiple annexations and/or detachments) made pursuant to the
Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code
Sec. 56000 et seq.)
PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: McCLELLAN RD, 88-06
Annexation )
3YdCSX)Vfi%92Ut )tOXIEM _ THE CITY OF CUPERTTNO
1WA% V8=is7 aA7p (City or Spec.District)
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL
X THF, CITY OF CUPERTINO as Lead Agency for environmental review
(Name of City/District)
of the project, has already PREZONED -
(prezoned? other approval action?)
the territory on JUNE 4, 1984 and in compliance with CEQA, has:
(date)
_ determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from pro-
visions of CEQA pursuant to Cal.Adm.COde Sec.
(cite class exemption section).
X completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the
annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application.
completed a Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is
attached to this application.
LAFCO is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the pro-
ject and the completed Environmental Information Form required by
LAFCO environmental assessment staff is attached to this applica-
tion. (Environmental staff phone: (408) 299-2521.)
Proposal is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA pursuant to
Cal. Adm. Code Sec. because
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA
1. Number of acres 0.312 A
2. Number of inhabitants 0
3. Number of registered voters 0
4. Number of dwelling units 0
5. a. What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific):
VACANT
b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are
under contract with the County under provisions of the Williamson
Act: N/A
c. What steps, if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken
to release the above parcel(s) from the contract?
N/A
FILING DEADLINE: 5:00 p.m. on the first Wednesday of the month, for LAFCO
hearing on the second Wednesday of the following month.
6. a. For city annexations, what is the prezoning that has been applied
by the city to the affected area (Note: Prezoning is a LAFCO fil-
ing requirement for city annexations):
R-1 7.5
b. Does the applicant intend to propose a change in this zoning if
and '.hen the territory is annexed to the city? YES _ NO tx
If YES, indicate the new zoning which will be sought.
7. For city or district annexations, describe the development being pro-
posed for the territory, if any, and when this development is ex-
pected to begin.
RESIDENCE 1988
8. Do the b,)undaries of the subject territory conform to lines of
assessment and ownership? YES X NO
If NO, please explain the reason for non-conformity and provide
justification for LAFCO's approving the boundary change as proposed:
9. Do the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island,
corridor or strip of unincorporated territory? YES _ NO
If YES, answer the following questions:
a. Number of acres in the island, corridor
nr strip? (If more than one island is
being created, indicate the acreage of
each island.)
n. plumber of inhabitants?
c. Assessed value?
d. Land use and zoning in island, corridor
or strip?
e. Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island:
f. Does the proponent request waiver of restriction against
creation of an island? YES _ NO
If YES, explain why creation of an island is justified.
SERVICES
10. Is the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorganization in
the City or District's urban service area? YES x NO _
11. If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development
be permitted without community sewage discharging into an existing
sanitary sewer system and disposal plant? YES _ NO _X—
If YES, what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal?
12. Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the construc-
tion of any public improvements to the affected territory be financed
by the formation of a special assessment district? YES _ NO X
If YES, describe service(s) or improvement(s) and the average cost
per resident/landowner of the district.
Service/improvement:
Cost: $ /yr. for _ yrs. $ /yr. for _ yrs.
Suc,l. A�ol. - 2
13. List all cities, special districts, (including school districts) and
County Service Areas located within the area of this proposal. (Ex-
elude Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco Bay Area Air
Pollution Control District, County Library Zone, and Water Importa-
tion.) (Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this information):
CUPERTINO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT
FREMONT HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT MID PENINSULA OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
FOOTHILL COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
For changes in organization of Districts, list all cities within 3
miles of the subject territory:
N/A
14. 'or city annexations, list those concurrent or future detachments
from Special Districts which are proposed for this territory.
N/A
LANDOWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
15. Please provide the information requested below:
a. Owners of land` within the proposed annexation/detachment/reor-
ganization who consent to this proposal should show their consent
by signing and printing or typing their names and addresses, with
date, below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated
by property-owner petition; put "see petition" below and type or
print in names, addresses, etc.) Assessor's parcel number,
assessed land (not improvements) valuation, and, if 100%
Property-owner consent has been obtained, certification by City/
District Clerk, must be added prior to filing. Hearing not re-
quired if 100% property owner consent is obtained.
Assessed
Signature Street Address/ Parcel Value of
Date ;Print name below) City/State/Zip Tel.No. No. Land
"SEE PETITION"
KENNETH S. MANRAO 357-14-6,7 $I4,310
ROSEMARY A. MANRAO
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet 6 attach.)
• "Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last
Equalized Assessment Roll; where such person is no longer the owner,
then any person entitled to be shown as owner of land on the next
Assessment Roll; where land is subject to a recorded written agree-
ment of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser, and any public
agency owning land." Government Code Section 56048.
CERTIFICATE OF CITY/DISTRICT CLERK (Required for 100% Consent Proposal)
I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property located
within the annexation/WDMQWJAUBXWWA94VdgggVM proposed by this applica-
tion and that the i (number) signatures above represent all of the
owners of property included in this proposal. I FURTHER CERTIFY that,
pursuant to Government Code Section 56839, the City/M&XXXXM waives the
requirement for written notice and gives consent for the Commission to
make determinations on this proposal without notice or hearing.
Date:
City/DAXX L1=. Clerk
(Seal)
City/� of
Suppl. Appl. -3
b. Owners of land within the proposed annexation/detachment/reor-
ganization who do not consent to this proposal should be listed
by name, address, parcel number and assessed land valuation
below. Signatures and dates not required. Hearing will be held
for less-than-100%-consent applications.
Assessed
Street Address Parcel Value of
Name City/State/Zip_ No. Land
N/A
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet 6 attach.)
c. FOR NOT-100%-CONSENT PROPOSALS, list all registered voters resid-
ing in the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorgani-
zation if different from the landowners shown in lSa. and M.
above.
Street Address Street Address _
Name City/State/Zip Name City/State/Zip
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach)
lb. Print or type the name and address of officers or persons, not to
exceed three in number, who are to receive copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and mailed Notice of Hearing (in addition to the
Clerk/Administrator of each affected city or district):
Street Address
Name City/State/Zip
(1)
(2)
(3)
17. I hereby certify that all LAFCO filing requirements will be met and
that the statements made in this application are to the best of my
knowledge accurate.
TRAVICE WHITTEN _ 10300 TORRE AVE
(Print name of person complet- CUPERTINO, CA 95014
ing this applicat on) (Address)
(Signatu e) (Date)
NOTE: It is a general LAFCO filing requirement that a copy of this appli-
cation be filed with each school district shown on question H13 of this
document if the proposal involves ultimate new residential development of
five acres or more. It is the applicant's responsibility to submit this
information to the appropriate school district(s) and the signature above
is considered verification that this filing requirement has been met.
Suppl. Appl. - 4
MCCLELLAN ROAD, 88-06
(MANRAO)
All that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State
of California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 172, as shown on that certain map
entitled, "Map of Subdivision 'a' Monts Vista", which map was filed for
record in the office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State
of California, on April 11, 1917, in Book "P" of Maps, at page 20; said
point being along the boundary of that certain annexation to the City of
Cupertino entitled "Howell 76-9",
Thence NORTH, 109.21 feet along the westerly boundary of said Lot 172;
Thence EAST, 50.07 feet along the southerly boundary of Lot 159 of said
aforementioned map;
Thence NORTH, 109.21 feet along the westerly boundary of said Lot 159;
Thence EAST, 100.15 feet along the northerly boundary of said Lot 159;
Thence SOUTH, 109.21 feet along the easterly boundary of said Lot 159;
Thence WEST, 25.04 feet along the southerly boundary of said Lot 159;
Thence SOUTH, 109.21 feet along the easterly boundary of said Lot 172
to a point along said annexation "Howell 76-9";
Thence WEST, 25.04 feet along said annexation "Howell 76-9" to the Point
of Beginning.
Containing: 0.31 acres more or less.
A^N: 357-14-6,7
hP'
ALXAZAF-
MoGL.tu-/v-1
51'f�
LOCATIG nl FAAP
1
DSO LO R.�S Ave.,
v0 1
1 Zo .31tq�i. o� � �� ,jam• I— — -- V
I� Q
-IJ - - -
I I— yD.v1ICati.oa-
g z N
�wF'sT MGC�LEL.-LA►J Tzo.
Nowt to-9'
!0 I1Af-,
OP
C M�4tilru�v)
Arc Kiev
t aa0ta• /Ebl:i QY02-MK
CaGlornia LeM TWO Calnpony nsreby comma
Arw �fi57-30;/357�14-006rn ,ln':" ;:hin Inetmmol l .una eno+.. ..�1
•etas ao •yinal it
otuce«. , -,of ow Ooer.r�al
r 1 Ciara, rrnia,
RFStCRi S.MAMNO i ROSE11Afly A.
w.m. IWJ.4A0 flacsroe� a..----.
•••�' CALIFORNI LAND TITLE 60--NY
Ava,r
sow�w L-I SaAtr ABov wls.,ar sow artowora•S a
Grant Deed
•m.aaaN.lrn.a rraaWlal OmW(.�
aoealnmlary b.rw.,ua a i290-S..__
dI I oom oTan an tall vwa of propany mavera4 o.
i I eomputaa m fufl ratua In.value of Utas and alelmba sa•ra..WA x at vans of was.
II( I Unbmrpmataa aran: I I COY at..._.._.._.._....._............._....................._........._................
I I.Irrl/y—ama.
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERAMON,recelpt of which Is hareby acknowlLd9Cd,
DOfURE.S E.Fop-MM,an wmarried waxen
hereby GRAM(S)to XCI ETS S.MRM0 and EGSvtW A.MAN W,husband and wife
a: Joint Tenants
IMI propony to •SAMA CLAM Coontl',State or Caldo..W.daanbad
IM 159 and 172,as shorn an that certain Map entitled. 'Nap of Slbdiview W
Monte Vistas,Mich Meg was filed for record in the office of the Recorder of the
C'nty of Santa Clare,State of California on April 11.1917 in Book aP'of Nape,at
page(e) 20.
M•II w mtwmu u-.(�pKp(t-p�.e�epaa- /1—�"
D -lalf�-25tprigSS•----- -- /mac- -�C/—
STATE OF CALIrOaNI' I. }`•a• OflAAPS S.FORSYM1BE
COUNTY O�SIB
asters ev,Ma w0anlrna0.
a Notary Pubea m am To,ru atala MaeonRy app—ad.
Dolores E Atha
- m,praaaa to m.m w.w.ra of
utataalory vlAannl Iv M Ia param,_wboo oama� __.._ -. —
Warw•p b tM WWn bW.Wnmt am aeanowla0ra0 Wl
Sh9_aaaoulaa lea.una wi—my nand son arrow rw. 11-HOAL 5L^L
/ MAILU K.KKED0
IUL)fNC .Oown.u w.Ia:a.w�
/lWEII. R. IOiIDD
n.a.rYro.aw 1luupl ur o�mn..m Ewrn+era Iwc
IV'v1"O^
I MAIL TAX b/ATIMENTS AS DINICttD AkOVE
CH of C,.Iir1I
N I•;l:A'1'I V I•: I1I•:I:I.A It A I'I t IN
Moo 21, 1981,
Ali pruvitled by the linvlruuuu•ulal A!avrvr:uu•nl I'e Ile—, adopt rd by ibr Clly
Cnnnt:ll of the City of Cuprrt Lnu oa March 2.7, 1971, ;or. am,•ndrd. tha• gal Iowinit
drtirrlbed pr(:jrrl wlta gr/utled a NnGnl Ivr 11rrlaral ion by the City Council of
Lhc City of Cupvrl.lno .,it May 21. 1984.
I'r„.jrt.l Ilc!:rripl Ion_and Lnraliun
Appl lent ion 4-HA-114 Appl leant: City ,1 Cupnrl inn (0111 Plop Ut VisLn nren)
l.rcnt loll: Crnrrnl Iv bounded by Granada Avenue Yu the
m rill, Imperial Av(•aur to, Ihr east,
Mrl;lellnn It—ad In (lie s..alb and by the
w,•!:I t•,I bmntd;,,.y ur Ihr Nlackbcrry
Dorm (;,,If Curse to I.he wr::t.
U lsr rel Iun_ary Ac_I Ina Itt.qurrl: I'rrznnlr :utd rrznm
---approximntrly 97 nerrw wllhln the Old Month VIvL;I
n-ra to iti-N (Itr;Id(,at Iol S(nl;l e-I'amI Iv), I'I-7.5
(Itrs idea 1.l;tl Sinl;I v-fatal Iv), I' (I,I nom•d Nrvrlopnu•nY.
wIL11 11 Ita•S ld('nl het 11./1-12 deal,II Inl; nn llv ptv I;rocs
nv rr), I. (I'Innnrd IL•vrlupuu•nt will, a Ilraldrul Inl
4.4-7.7 dwrl l h,P, unit!: I,r 1;env!: arrr), 11 (VI;nn...I
Developmrnl will, 1.11:hl Indnvtrl:tl and Itr•Ild(.nt lal),
1' (111anord tlrvri"I'l I wllh Altrlrnllure/Rerreat tonal),
and RI) (publ Iv Itu11d11,R) zuninl; distrlrts.
Iaudlnls of Mrclylumm�klnp__Ilutly.
'1'hr Clly Council I:rMILrd :I Nr};ot Ive Nrvinrnl lull vint•r Ihr prrjrrt Is rotisistout
wlLh file C(meral I'Ian mud line: no sigtill Nail (•nvlr nntnonl.al Immpaviss./
�11t•!: II. SI!ck
I'L•Inn lnl; IIIruvinr
This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed
In the office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on May
22t 1984.
. y C1�Cl.r�k (�
Initial Study
City of Cupertino
Environmental Assessment Procedures
E. A. File Number(s) 4-EA-84
Application File Number(s) 1-Z-84
Date February 27, 1984
The California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, requires public
agencies to evaluate public and private projects to determine their potential
impact on the environment.
This worksheet is intended to provide guidance for both you, the applicant, and
City officials in assessing a proposed project to determine whether it may or
may not have a significant impact on the environment.
If,based upon the 'nformation provided below, the City makes a determination that
your project may have a significant impact on the environment, you will be required
to prepare an Environmental Impact Report as provided by State law and the City
of Cupertino's Environmental Assessment requirements.
Detailed information.regarding the environmental assessment procedure is avail-
able from the Director of Planning and Development.
Port I
Information to be completed by the Applicant
Project Type (Pre)Zoning I X1 Tentative Map t other
Use Permitl= Variance U
OW Monta Vista Area genera y -on<et! )y raonra_venue rn Elie'norfii, "tmperlal
Location Avenue to the east, McClellan Road to the at th and by the westerly boundary of
the Hfackberry Parm GoLl. Course to tile west.
Applicant City of Cupertino
Address of Applicant 10100 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 Phone(408) 252-4505
General Description of Project Prezone and rezone the above areas to zoning
districts consistent with the 'General Plan. The projrt.t site contains approximately
97 acres.
Rev.7/8/80
-1-
Description of Project (cont'd.)
Soecific Details of the Proiect
1. Size of Site N/A
2. ?ntensity of Development
(a) If residential:
(1) Number of units per gross acre
(2) Residential Unit Schedule:
Owner- No. of Size Estimated Total
Rental ship Bedrooms Sq.ft. Sales Price Number
Unit type ®1
Unit type 02
Unit type 03
Unit type 04
Unit type 05
TOTAL
(3) Percentage in area of building coverage
Percentage in area of recreational open space
(4) Parking required Parking proposed
(b) If commercial, industrial, or institutional:
(1) Building square footage
(2) Percentage of building coverage of site
(3) Estimate of maximum number of employees per shift
(4) Parking required Parking proposed
-2-
Ouestions Related to Potential Imoact of Project
A. Social/Cultural Impacts: Yes Mavbe No
(1) Will the proposed project result in the dis-
placement of people? X
(2) Will the project alter the employment base
of the community? V
(3) Will the project alter the housing needs
of the community? X
(4) Does the proposed project affect a historical
or archaelogical site? X (Nnte t)
(Page 4)
B. Physical Impacts:
(1) 'Will the project result is a change of a natural
body of water, vegetative cover, or land form? !_ X
(2) Will the project result in a change in a scenic
view or vista from existing residential area
or public lands or roads? X
(3) !All the project change the development pattern,
scale or character of general area of project? X
(4) Will the construction and/or operation of the
project result in significant amount of solid
waste, litter, dust, ash, smoke, fumes or
odors in the vicinity? X
(5) Will the project result in a change in stream
or ground water quality or quantity or altera-
tion of existing drainage patterns? X
(6) Will the project substantially change existing
noise or vibration levels in the vicinity? X
(7) Is the project site cn filled land or on
slope of 10% or greater? X
(8) Does the project involve the use or disposal
of potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammable or explosive? X
(9) Is the project a phase of an existing or
future larger project or series of projects? X
-3-
Desctiotion of the Environmental Setting
Provide the following Information on a separate attachment:
(1) Describe the project site as It exists before the project,
including information an topography, soil stability, plants
and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of
structures. A plot plan may be required for the description.
(2) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on
plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commer-
cial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment
houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of devel-
opment (height, frontage, set-back, teat yard, etc.).
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infoi-
motion required for this initial evaluation to the best of my
ability, and that the facts, statements, and information pre-
sented are true and correct to the est of my knowledge and
belief.
DateMAKt6f Q_ T->I /___ +�
(Signature)
For G t r —517 &UpeI_f1A�o
(1) The project-site is comprl9cd of existing irl,nn dr"Iopment Inrludfut! a
acre golf eonrse and picnic ground recrrnCloo romplex. The entire, Wren
has general historlc value. A few Ntrnctores Tff I+nve greater historical
vottie ns separate entities. 'I'ho rrrreafAml complex in located In the
100-year event flood plan for Stevens Creek.
(2) Tile project area is bordered by the. Old Nnnta Vista Cocuno rr lnl Dictricr
to the north, by the Went Valley industrial Vark to the east nod by
single-family residential ne LFhhorl+c+oda to the a++oth and we,,t.
Part I I
Information to 6e completed 6y City Officials
A. Primary General Plan'.Considerations: Yes Havbe' No
(1) Is the project in violation of the City of
Cupertino's adopted General Plant X1
(2) Will the project burden public utilities and
services?
(a) Fire and police services X
(b) Parks and recreation system X
(c) Schools X
(d) Water system X
(e) Sever system X
(f) Storm system X
(g) Solid waste X
(3) Is the project side outside of the Urban Ser-
vice Area of the City as defined by Santa
Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission? X
B. Social/Cultural Impacts:
(1) Will the proposed project result in the dis-
placement of people? X
(2) Will the project alter the employment base
of the community? X
(3) Will the project alter the housing needs
of the community? X
(4) Does the proposed project affect a histori-
cal or archaelogical site? X
(5) Will the proposed project eliminate an
existing recreational use at the project site? X
(6) Does the proposed project decrease public
access to any public body of water of recrea-
tional areal X
(7) Will the proposed project alter the location,
distribution, density or growth rate of the
human population of an area? X
.(8) Will the project result in: Yes Navbe No .
(a) The disturbance of a natural or man-made
feature in the project area which is unique? X
(b) The obstruction of a.scenic vista open to
the public? X
C. Physical Impacts:
(1) Will the proposed project result in the exposure
of people or property to geologic hazards such
as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground
failure or similir hazards? X
(2) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructures? X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? X
(c) Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? X
(d) The destruction, covering or modifica-
tion of any unique geologic or physical
feature? X
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soil, either on or off the site? X
(3) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? X
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally? X
(4) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns or the rate and amount of surface
water runoff? X
(b) Alterations to the course or flow of
flood waters? X
(c) Discharge into surface waters, or
in anv alteration of surface water quality,
includinq but not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
Yes Maybe No '
(d) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground water? X .
(e) Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavation? X
(f) Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for. public water
supplies?
x
(g) Exposure of people or property to water-
related hazards such as flooding or tidal
wave. X
(5) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants? X
(c) Introduction of new species of plants into
an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species? X
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop? X
(e) Changd in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X
(f) Reduction'of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? X
(g) Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a harrier to
the migration or movement of animals? X
(h) Deteridration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? X
(6) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Increase in existing noise levels? _X
(b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X
(7) Does the proposed project significantly affect
the potential use extraction or conservation of
a scarce natural resource such as agricultural
land, a mineral deposit, or woodland? _x_
Yes Mavbe No
(8) Will the proposed project involve the use,
storage, or disposal of hazardous materials? X
(9) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy? X
(b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy? X
(10) Will the proposed projaut result in:
(a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement? X
.(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X
(c) Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems? X
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and/or goods? X
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air
traffic? X
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X
(11) Mandatory Findings of Significance:
(a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? X
(b) Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (a short-
term impact on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time, while long-term impacts will
endure into the future,) X
• Yes !lavbe No
(c) Does the project have impacts which are
individually Limped, but cumulatively con—
siderable? (A project may impact on two or
more separate resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively small, but where
the effect of the total of those impacts
on the environment is significant.) A
(d) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
(Note: Use additional sheets if necessary.)
Determination:
On the basis df this initial evaluation, the Environmental Review Committee finds:
_I That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environ—
ment, and therefore recommends the GRANTING Of A NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
nThat,alrhough the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because
of the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. It is recommended that A NEGATIVE DECLARATION BE PREPARED.
r-1 That the proposed project NAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENNVVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date
H an, Environmental Review Committee
Far