HomeMy WebLinkAboutFoothill 79-1 Annexation ANNEXATION FOOTHILL 79-1
1979
ti
F-A
rt"
m aqo4o,0 o" 20
V zA 1_6-
-OLD
71
L_!n-
i"
. I �
%I 1 -
LOC.AcIaoffm% BIND.M
C__-
^'
�,° PARCEL I cp —
� FIF
Ao 342 - Z - 42 , ppfV cR. _ w 9v 106
" 0, e
t4 8914d oe w. 53,9.42.
Z94 or,' < z2sl4- - �RD p py
PARCC-L.
342 - 43
00
EP4,
200'
S.417'
PROPOSED Art"EXA-no"
C_
i
-n %
THE- _TTo `f OF' CLIF:3'CR_r' '40
I
e; 4-4.�15MAM'0-4
01:OOTHILL
R 1 .5 F_D
-m 48 7'2>
I 19-19 zoo
Local Agency Formatlor,Commission
County Administration Building
70 West Hedding Street,
County of Santa Clara San Jose, California 1
10
rea Codea 408
California
7Y-1: City of Cupertino
FROM: Local Agency Formation Commission
DATE: March 30, 1979
SUBJECT: FOOTHILL 79-1
This is to advise that documents associated with the above change of
organization have been found to be in order and the necessary filings -
have been made with the County Recorder, State Board of Equalization
and County Assessor, as required by law.
Enclosed is an endorsed copy of zne Certificate of Completion which
was recorded with the County Recorder on March 30, 1979 .
If the above change of organization included detachment from a fire
disprict, it is required by law that detachment must be effected within
on year; however completion of the detachment by January st will
pre en the prope ty from being taxed by both the City an the fire
dis rict. You a e therefore, encouraged to complete detachment by
thi date.
After t ritory has n detached froct�.
please complete and return the fUM--bdrow. (Fire District)
Thank you,
v
Paul E. Sagers
Assistant Executive Officer
-----------------I----------------------------------------------------------
J
Local Agency Formation C ission f
70 West Hedding Street, Eas Wing, loth Floor '
San Jose, California 95 0
J�
Detachment of from
(Annexation) / (Fire District)
l
has been completed b e City of
on
(date)
Signature
® LAFC-50
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Local Agency Fonn.abn Cenunlalon
County Administration Building
�` 70 West Madding Street,
`es Of, Son Jose, California 95110
County of Santa Clara Area Code 4W
California
F
w -trn
o v 7JC7
M
�� ♦\� by OW
0..Zo/ O '? C,�.
N0) -Z ' n
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
I, Paul E. Sagers, the Assistant Executive Officer of the Santa
Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission, issue this Certificate
of Completion pursuant to Section 104 1/35351 of the Government
Code.
I hereby certify that I have examined the resolution for a change
in organization/ attached hereto and have found this
document to be in compliance with the resolution adopted on
March 7, 1979 by the Santa Clara County Local Agency
Formation Commission approving said change in organization or reorganization.
The name of the t/City is:_ e42ertino
r
The entire t/City is located in Santa Clara County.
The change of organization xnpleted is an anne3:ation
A map and description of the boundaries of the change of organization is
appended hereto.
Tie title of this proceeding is: FOOTHILL 79-1
The ehan,e of organization was ordered subject to the following terms
and conditions:
None
The date of adoption of the resolution ordering the change of organization/
is March 19, 1979
Dated March 30, 1979 A ��
Assistant Executive #Fficir
Santa Clara County
Local Agency Formation Commission
r
t;
Logal Apm Foneistlon Coweni ston
County Administration Building
70 west Nodding stras1;ROOM
g 11�g
— County of Santa Clare 299 31J91 WUto a—4 ling
Ana Cods408
Cellf0mle
EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION OF SIGNATURES TO
-PETITION OF LANDOWNERS AND CERTIFICATE OF FILING
The undersigned certifies as follows:
I am the duly selected and acting Executive Officer of the Santa Clara
County Local Agency Formation Commission.
A petition entitled "Petition for Ant:exation/ of
Territory to the City of Cupe'r'ti.n
and designated FOOTHILL - --
was filed with me on Jan,"�I , 1979 .
Said petition is signed by landowners and, pursuant to Sections 35110 to
35124 inclusive, Government Code, I have examined the
petition.
The results of my examination are as follows:
1. All signatures on the petition ware secured within six months of
the date on which the first signature on the petitiot: was affixed, and the
petition was submitted for filing within 60 days after last signature was
affixed.
2. Said petition was signed by all of the landowners owning land
within the territory proposed to be annexed • * �! who also
own all of the assessed value of land within slHch territory.
3. The petition and supplemental application filed on this proposal
contain all of the information and data required by Section 35110/56t*IP of
the Government Code, and all the information and data requested by the
Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission.
Based upon such examination, it is HEREBY DETERMINED AND CERTIFIED that
the petition is a sufficient petition and was signed by all of the owners
of land within the territory proposed to be annexed/
and said petition is hereby being certified for filing on the date shown
below.
This petition will be considered at the march 7 1979 meeting
of the Local Agency Formation Commission..
Dated: Feb. 14, 1979
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
WILLIAM M. SIEGEL, Executive Officer
i
by
Paul E. Sagers/
Assistant ExeCrutive Officer
78-7a
Property owner Petition - 10O% Consent
R
*OUNTY OF SANTA CLA71A
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISON
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Designation FOOTHILL 79-1 Annex/DWwb . to city of L-ula rtino
LAFCO Agenda Hearing No. 5 100% Consent AX
LAFCO Hearing Date 3/7/79 Not 100% Consent
t
1. REVIEW OF PROPOSAL:
(a) Acreage and location: 15.38 acres; west side of Foothill Blvd. between
Stevens Creek Blvd. and Freeway 280
(b) Effect on community services:
X Provision of all municipal/district services.
Municipal/District services not provided as follows:
Detachment from: None
N/R School Disti ict Impact Report
NA County Transit impact Report
(c) Boundaries:
X Definite and Certain.
Indefinite and uncertain.
X Conform to Urban Service Area.
Do not conform to Urban Service Area.
Do not create island, corridor or strip.
_X__ Create island, corridor or strip. 403 acre island created. Approx. 40 residents
X— Conforms to road policy.
—� Does not conform to road policy.
X Conforms to lines of assessment.
Splits lines of assessment as follows:
(d) Present land use: Vacant Land
(e) Proposed land use: Residential
2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF PROPOSAL
Annexation is categorically exempt from provisions of CEOA.Class Exemption
_X_ The City has prezoned the territory and, as Lead Agency for the environmental review of the
annexation,has completed an Initial Study and Negative DeclarationbF*lekFM(copy attached)which
in LAFCO staffs' opinion does/kno of adequately address LAFCO rf gional concerns.
LAFCO is the Lead Agency for the environmental review of this annexation and staff has prepared the
attached Negative Declaration/Draft EIR for your review and adoption.
3. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OR OTHER COMMENTS: Annexation is necessary for the orderly
development of City. LAFCO should waive prohibition against creating
islands.
4. PROTESTS:
5 RECOMMENDATION: Certify that you have considered Cupertino's Negative
Declaration, waive the prohibition against creating islands and authorize
the city of Cupertino to proceed without notice or hearing.
by Date Feb. 26, 1979
Paul E. Sagers
Distribution: Assistant Executive Officer
Don Haler, Land Dev Eng/Press,/City of Cupertino/Daniel %lalsh, Archdiocese of
San Francisco, Chancery office, 445 Church Steeet, San Francisco, CA 94114/
LAFC 2 4/77
i
i
i
i
i
4
i
13113SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION
MR
CITY OR SPEGIATI sia*p-m
MANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
County Government Center, East wing
70 West Hedding Street
San Jose, California 95110
Commission Secretary - Phone 299-4321
Assistant Executive Officer - Phone 299-3191
This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted
with any petition or resolution of application to LAFCO for a change
of organization (annexation o sat ow _ e _.._;,.-a_., (MU irp e
the Municipal
Organization Act of 1977 (Government Code 35000 et seq.) -__ _he D__t___-
s
Please reference the separate information sheet for all LAFCO filing
requirements.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL
k/The proposal involves annexation to a city and the city council
adopted an ordinance prezoning the subject territo rY on
December 18,1978 ?ursuant to Cal. Adm. Code Section 15065,
therefore, the city as Lead Agency for the environmental review
of this annexation has:
determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from
provisions of CMA pursuant to Cal. Adm. Code Section
(cite cuss exemption section)
X completed an initial Study and Nevative Declaration for the
annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application.
completed a Final EI R for the annexation, a copy of which is
attached to this application.
LAFCO is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the
project and the Project Environmental Data required by the LAFCO
Environmental Assessment Staff is attached to this application.
(Environmental Staff phone 299-2521.)
Prc-focal is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA pursuant
to Cal. Adm. Code Section because
GENERAL INFORMATZOr1
1. Nature of Proposal: Annexation
CITY OF CL'PERTINO
DESIGNATED AS: FOOTHILL 79 - 1
Proposal being made pursuant to:
x Municipal Organization Act of 1977 (Govt. Code 35000 et seq)
District Reorganizaion Act of 1965 (Govt. Code 56000 et seq)
78-3
FILING DEADLINE -5 :00 P.M. this office, last Wednesday of each month
(for the L pc meeting approximately 5 weeks hence)
E
2. Location of proposed change of organizatiaa or rearganization:
WEST side of FOOTHILT, BOULEVARD
(north, south, etc.. ;street or road)
at/between STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD and YREEWAY 280
3 . what is the chief reason c`ur this proposal?
To obtain City services
4. it is desired that the proposed annexation
be made subject to the fallowing terms and conditions (ref. Govt.
Code Section 54790.1 and 56470) :
N/A
MLAACT£RISTICS OF M AREA
S. Number of acres 15.38
6. Number of inhabitants 0
7. Number of registered voters 0
S. Number of dwelling units 0
9. a. what is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific) :
VACANT
b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are
under contract with the County under provisions of the Williamson
Bill
C. what steps, if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken
to release the above parcel(s) from the contract?
10. a. For city annexations, what is the prezoning that has been applied
by the city to the affected area (Note: ?rezoning is a L',FCO
filing requirement for city annexations) :
R1(7.5) P1(10) Rl(20) and BQ
B. Does the applicant intend to propose a change in this zoning if
and when the territory is annexed to the city? YES NO X
if yea, indicate the new zoning which will be sought.
ll,. For city or district annexations, describe the development being
proposed for the territory, if any, and when this development is
expected to begin:
Residential 1280
12. Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of
assessment and ownership? YES X NO
If No, please explain the reason for non-conformity and provide
justification why IAFCO should approve the boundary change as
proposed:
-2-
13 . Do the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island,
corridor or strip of unincorporated territory? YES_.,I_ NO
if YES, answer the following questions:
a . Number of acres in the island, corridor or strip? 4�.: o.
(if more than one island is be.'ng created,
indicate the acreage of each island.)
b. Number of inhabitants? 40. +
c. Assessed value? $129,325.00
d. Land use and zoning in island, ctarridor or strip.
a„ e identi l -
e. Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in
Island: c,it®aterr and ;s r:*ct aewer service
f. Does the proponent zequest waiver of restriction againut
creation of an island? YwS„I NO
if YES, explain why creation of an island is justified:
The Citv has contacted the residents in the area and 100% cvnsenc
does not appear to be obtainable_.
SEA
14. is the territory proposed for annexation/ _ � (
in the City or Districts urban service area? YES_X_ NO
15. if new development is proposed on the site, will this new development
be permitted without community siewage discharging into an _xisting
sanitary sewer system and disposal plant? YES X NO
if YES, what arrangements will be made to provide for sewage disposal?
16. will the extension of sewerage and/or water services, or the
construction of any public improvements to the affected -t-erritory
be financed by the formation of a special assessment district?
YES NO X
If YES, describe service (s) or improvement (s) and the average cost
per resident/landowner of the district:
Service/improvement $ /yr. for`vyears.
17. List all cities, special districts (include all school dish=e-ts) and
County Service Areas located within the area contained in this propo-
sal, (exclude Santa Clara County water District, San Francisco Bay
Area Air pollution Control District, County Library Zone and water
Tmportation) (Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this information) :
Cupertino Union School District Central Fire District
Fremont Union High School District Mid-Peninsula Regional Parks
Foothill Collage District Cupertino Sanitary District
For proposals made pursuant to District Reorganization Act, list all
cities within 3 miles of the subject territory:
N/A
-3-
18. For City annexans made pursuant to MORGO list those concurrent or
future detachments from Special Districts which are proposed for this
territory.
LhM)OMRS MM REGISTERED VOTERS
19. Please provide the information requested below:
a. If the owners of land* within the proposed annexation /
onsent to this proposal, each should show his/her
consent by signing his/her name, address, and date below. (Sig-
natures not rewired if proposal is initiated by property owner
petition: put "see petition" on this line and type or print in
names.) Assessor's parcel number, assessed valuation and certi-
fication by City/District Clerk must be added prior to filing.
Rearing not required if 100% property owner consent is obtained.
Signature Address Date Parcel **Assessed
Number valuation
.a.e
342-12-42 $13,325.00
342-1.2-43 $60,825.03
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach.)
*"Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last
Equalized Assessment Rolls where such person is no longer the owner, then
any person entitled to be shown as owner of land on the next Assessment
Roll; where land is subject to a recorded written agreement of sale, any
person shown therein as purchaser, and any public agency owning land. "
Government Code Section 54797.1.
CERTIPT�CATE OF CIS ' '��� CLEREC (Reetuired for 102% Consent Proposals) .
I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property located within
the annexation proposed by this application and
that the / signatures above represent all of the owners of property
included i proposal.. I FURTHER CERTTFY that pursuant to Government
Code Section 35151/56261 the city/district waives the requirement for written
notice and gives consent for the Comission to make determinations on this
proposal without notice or hearing. }
Data:
City � Clerk
City/W of
b. If owners of land within the proposed annexation/
do not consent to this proposal, list their names,
addresses, parcel numbers and assessed valuation below. Signatures
and dates not required. Hearing will be held for less than 100%
consent applications.
Name Addrass Parcel **Assessed
Number valuation
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach.)
**Assessed values should be shown for land only for proposals made pursuant
to DRA or for inhabited proposals made under MORGA; values for land and
improvements should oe shown for uninhabited city proposals made pursuant
to MO PGA.
-4-
c. For Not 100% Consent proposals, list all registered voters
residing in the territory proposed for annexatiorr�R-attment/
reorganization if different from the Landowners shown in 19a.
and i9b. on page 4.
Voter Name Address Voter Name Address
(if additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach)
20. Print or type the name and address of officer or persons, not to
exceed three in number, who are to receive copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and mailed Notice of Rearing (in addition to Chief
Petitioners and the Clerk/Administrator of each affected city(s) or
district (a)
Name Address
(1)
(2)
(3)
21. I hereby certify that all IAFM filing requirements will be met and
that the statements made in this application are to the best of my
knowledge accurate.
Travice Whitten 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, Ca.
(Print name of person completing Address
this application.
January 31, 1979
ignature ,Date
NO3'E: It is a general IAFCO filing requirement that a copy of this appli-
cation be filed with each school district shown on question 017 of
this document if the proposal involves ultimate new residential
development of five acres or more. It is the applicant 's responsi-
bility to submit this information to the appropriate school dis::ict (s
and the signature above is considered verification that this filing
requirement has been met.
-5-
City of Cupertino
NtGATIVE DECLARATION
December 4 , 1978
As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City
Council of the City of Cupertino on March 27, 1973, as amended, the follow-
ing described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the City Council
of the City of Cupertino on December 4, 1978-
Project Description and Location
Application 39-EA-78 Applicant: S.A.S. Homes , Inc.
Location: Westerly side of Foothill . alevard approxi-
mately 150 ft. southerly of Poppy Drive
immediately opposite the s„tersection of
Salem Drive.
Discretionary Action Request: Prezoning approximately
15.4± acres from Santa Clara County R1-10 (Single-
family residential) to various City of Cupertino
zoning districts including approximately 3.7t acres
to City of Cupertino R1-7.5 (Residential, single-
family, 7,500 sq. ft. minimum lot size) ; approximately
3.6 acres to City of Cupertino R1-10 (Residential,
single-family, 10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) ;
approximately 2.0± acres to City of Cupertino R1-20
(Residential, single-family, 20,000 sq. ft. minimum
lot size) ; approximately 6.1 acres to City of Cupertino
B{ (Quasi-Public) zoning district; Tentative Map to
subdivide said property into 27 single-family lots
ranging in size from 7,500 sq. ft. to 26,000 sq. ft.
and two lots consisting of a total of approximately
6.4 net acres; and Annexation of said property into
the City of Cupertino.
Findings of Decisionmaking Body_
The City Council granted a Negative Declaration since the project is consistent
with the General Plan and has no significant environmental impacts.
ames H. Sisk
Tanning Director
This is to certify that the attached Negative Declarations was filed in the :,ffic
of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on ��.,� -�
Date
City Clerk