The URL can be used to link to this page

TR-2022-038 - Approved Plans and Documents \ J Krpch PI - �1 - '- •� - EX C&C TO REMAIN AC SAWCUT&12"AC PLUGS SAWCUT AND DOYe 7Q - 1 (rrn) . � rc sD sS EX.c&c TO REMAIN �-y (N)4"PVC SDR-26 SS LATERAL®2% (N)DRIVEWAY PER, _5 FL 90X5 r CITY B1D DTL 1-�3 FL 9057 (E'ENFORM) 0 TT'9¢20-" _ TC 92.24 _ OF)FL 89.80 C FL 9P 24 FL 91.70 (CONFORM) Community LJ� t)6b'' entJ CONFORH) �+ HSw 90.30 FAI ING WALL TO BE REM VED 1 UTC 93.4 ° P I a n li!i TY STIJI�Dimph CW 9112 CE)FL 929 4n pq, a61. (EiTC U UW 3 \ 'C U P E RT I N Q [C;FLA 5 / DWY 90.67 },� I 5 S CN o,be'r n ' 0WY_9180 �A - FG 9990 TV 92 0 }�. R @. -BSw 93,49 HSw 9243 y pWY 910Z� J - Case fit I� �-. - -I VY 9L90 `� -� Application r(s) FG g325 -A FIG 114� FG 9475 ,,I ( (N)WATER METER V x�x DAYLIGHT Appro Val Body. Director/lSta TW.,.9�Fi0: APN)SSCO ` APPROXIMATE LOCA➢ON INV 91,50 BW N9E.5 FlELOOVERITE L0CAVI 4 FIELD VERIFY WY 913E `� DWY 9198 1 1 Approva I Date 02/02/23I TO 95O �86 6'PVC 0 5% - ----- F BW 92.00 INLET ALP SUBDRAIN __} TO 93.00 Signature Emi Su I ama NV 9530 r SD NV 4°PVC(IN)92.50 NV 89.00 x E.77 e (OVERFLOW RUN __ ._y, TDS 95,50 - ` TO STREET GLITTER INLET/DRYWELL Case M nage - TDS 960 ;,, S ALLOW G kl_BASIN ia% �8% TO 92.50 d' 1 TIES965 R•C T%4'DEE4y '1.[,.. t I [NV 9100 1 FG 9560 - kA OVERFLOW RUNS TO SF IDS 5,90 _ 5 5_�2% TES 94.20 ml .-TW 9500 DVY 9380 -BW 93.20 IP PI TOS 9380 - YP)INDICATES DOWNSPOUT TO SPLASH BLOCK �1 -2' KICKBOARD^ JO of L A71ONS ARE CONCEPTUAL VERIFY WITH ROOF PLAN TIPV 9AIN 300 �. c gg �x g9.62 NEW GAS&ELEC. TW 95,00 W �' � BW 93,20 w METER(PG&E) I� Tw 97.75 Bw 95,75 l nl 1 IR, " w `� � � ' � LL �I GARAGE � I� {I 1 98 0 TW 95,00 1--B6V-l5.fi0 �n TFl$94,00 I� BW 93,40 98.E5 .62 �� g�1 EARTH SWA.LE 0 17 99.5� "- _ L r FF 97.75 1 TV 9eso i4 � PAD t95.25 N I BW 96,00 �TW 97.0- io BW 9450 s CONC. `TI - / m m s 2X9"m II �I '� xa,s.Fl° a, DRIP I to g i. } I ':F3.7 - TW 900 BW 95,6.00 100,01 T0.S 91.F5 -I U 91,fiS TDS 97.25 t 9 1 TV 99.70 °' yl i% [% 1 tBW'96•P0 9 .881 TOS 97.P 70S 97.12 98.76 Imo, al x _ TDS 96,6) TDS 96.60 I @' KICKBDARp '8 1 5 1 Uq o FG 9640 FIG 9639 e HP SUBDRAIN o HP SWALE FL 95.50 i� � __ FL 95,90 Tw 96,00 y TFlS 9675 2 TFlS 9675 - Dv 95,00 FL 5WALE --. �� iC2.6 x FG 9650 FG 9¢50 z I FG 945U C`>��-/ (E o x102. 7 x103.0 } A -`EART SWALE,.31% !2 1q 3J(�. i x 99, 4 3,42 ! 1C2. 9 TW IODUTNC. x z ! Bw 97D00 . INV 96.50 + -- / \ x 99.78 i 99,D' ~ I - I 9 �T CON C. 9p.96 URIP 34 f 1 Y �- 99.55 99.75 / i' 99. °9.0 TV 100.010 \ .} pR x1b0 3� i 98 Tc / C 0 its Plan 9.15 J2bb oad, t C 3x.TO 1 98,99 �l �g 1 99.1 D IF 4 + TV 1000 00 100 6 1 4�_ 1( x 99.25 .07 f 5.97 99.48 9. ) 6 HP SUBDRA / 79 NV 98 50 / I .23 10 9' 09 . 9 99.1b / 98.48 . � 99.49 �S HEED \ J Krpch Plac - �1 - '- •� - E$ C&C TO REMAIN AC SAWCUT&12"AC PLUG/ SAWCUT AND DOYe 7Q - 1 (rrn) . � rc sD sS Ex.c&c TO REMAIN �-y (N)4"PVC SDR-26 SS LATERAL®2% (N)DRIVEWAY PER, _5 FL 90105 CITY S1D DTL 1-�3 FL 9057 (E'ENFORM) 0 TT'99,20-" _ TC 92.24 _ OF)FL 89.80 C FL 9P 24 FL 91.70 (CONFORM) Community LJ� t)6b'' entJ CONFORH) �+ HSw 90.30 FAI ING WALL TO BE REM VED 1 UTC 93.4 ° P I a n li!i TY STIJI�Dimph CW 9112 CE)FL 929 4n p, a61. (EiTC U ue 5 \ 'C U P E RT I N Q [C;FLA 5 / BWY 90.67 S CN o,be'r 1 n ' EW1.9180 �A - FG 9990 TV 92 0 }�. R T@. -BSw 93.49 HSw 92�43 y DWY 9-.- --- J Case fits -.. �� - Application I r(s) �(N) 25 s - - FG 9475 rL 9425 I ,.91� p ( WA \ x 4�. '� DAYLIGHT Approva I Body: Director/ISta TW..,91aFi0: APN)SSCOTE LOCAB:1 APPR0I;1 711 vv INV 91,50 Bw95.5 FlEl➢VERIFY FIELD VE� i`9L96 BWY 9198 1 1 Approval Date 02/02/231 59 rile-INV --- F BW 3400 TO 95,00 18� 6'PVC® TW 92.00 00 ALP SUBORAIN __}I TO .DO Signature Emi S50 u I ama INV 9530 r S➢ - NV 4°PVC(IN) 2.7 NV 69.W x r c ,7 e TO STREET RUN ._y, TOS 95,50 - TO STREET GLITTER INLET/DRYWELL Case IVI ndKe - TOS 96�0 ; 5 ALLOW GF�hYEL BASIN �g� �� `�' TO 92.50 d' 1 TOS 96�5 R•C T%4'DEE4y A r,[,.. I [NV 9100 " ' 1 FG 9560 - k �' OVERFLOW RUNS TO ST IDS 5,90 _ S 1,25_�2% TFlS 94.20 ml .-TW 9508 DVY 9380 -BW 93.20 IP PI TOS 9380 - j YP)INDICATES DOWNSPOUT TO SPLASH BLOCK m-1 -2' KICKBFlARB^ JO of L A71ONS ARE CONCEPTUAL VERIFY WITH ROOF PLAN V 9300AIN - . c gg �x g9.52 NEW GAS&ELEC. TW 95,00 W �' � DW 93,20 w �•� METER(PG&E) I� Tw 97.75 Bw 95,75 LL GARAGE � I� {I 1 98 0 TW 95,00 1--B6V-l5.fi0 �n TFl$94,00 I� BW 93,40 98.E5 .62 �� g�l EARTH SWA.LE 0 17 99.5� "- _ LP FF 97.75 1 TV 9850 i4 � PAD ±95.25 I Bw 96.00 �TW 95.0- io BW 9450 t. s CONC. `TI - / m m s 2X9"m II �I '� xa,s.Fl° a, DRIP I to g i. } I ':F3.7 - TW 900 B'd 95,6.00 100,L11 T0.S Pz. TDS 91,fiS TOS 97.25 t 9 I TV 99.70 °' yl i% [% tBV'96•PO �x9 .88i TOS 97.P 70S 97.12 98.76 Imo, al x _ TDS 96,6) TFlS 96.60 I @' KICKBDARp '8 1 5 1 Uq o FIG 9640 FIG 9639 e HP SUBDRAIN o HP SWALE FL 95.50 i� SA ALE 10 __ FL 95,90 Tw 96,00 y � TFlS 9675 2 TFlS 9675 - -� Bw 95,00--. i02.6 x FG 9650 FG 9¢50 I FG 945U C`>��/ (E o 97. 4ED_. - 2.6") 1 x 02. p x103.0 `EART SWALE,.@ 17, !2 1 q 3J(�. i x 99, 4 3,42 ! 1C2. w too 9 opNC. ! Bw 97000 x 2. INV s6.5D + -- i \ x 99.78 i 99,D' ~ I - I 9 �T CON C. 9p.05 DRIP 34 f 1 Y �- 99.55 99.75 / i' 99. TV 10D.00 \ x100 Rep lacement Plan og �2 )Bubb Road, lot C + 59.1 � C IF 4' f�l , 98,99 TV 100�0 0 �9 ( x 99.25 .07 f`.H 8.97 99.48 9. ) E HP 41BDRAJ / 79 NV 98 50 / I 10 1.23 9' 09' 9 99.10 / 98.48 ELI] Communit Development Department rAIRI R, AnS-Tup8t9or O R T `�+-' CVPEEtT APPROVED NO - �� • Case# RE: TRE,E_IM5TOMSESSMENT �I� 0 Application Number(s) :• FIRESTONE App vaI BAO� Hid AI,/ ?tQai?F2 Consulting & Design A va I D e 02/02/23 11' pp REPARED FOR: TRACY HSU Signz ture Emi Suqiyama P R OJ E CTcaseJJz2,i2gfi,,SUBB RD., LOT C CUPERTINO, CA 95014 ASSIGNMENT On August 3, 2022, I visited the proposed building project at 11226 Bubb Road, Lot C. My assignment as Project Arborist was to generate a report to document the basic characteristics and proposed project impacts for all significant trees on the property and determine their suitability for preservation. I was also asked to review the adequacy of privacy screening provided by existing trees along the eastern viewshed. Instructions for working close to trees during construction were not included in the scope of this report. This report may be submitted to the City of Cupertino as part of the permit review process. LIMITATIONS Trees assessed were limited to the scope of work identified in the assignment. I have estimated the trunk diameters of trees with barriers to access or visibility (such as those on neighboring parcels or behind debris). Although general structure and health were assessed, formal Tree Risk Assessments were not conducted unless specified. Disease diagnostic work was not conducted unless specified. All assessments were the result of ground-based, visual inspections. No excavation or aerial inspections were performed. Recommendations beyond those related to the proposed construction were not within the scope of work. My tree impact and preservation assessments were based on information provided in the plans I have reviewed to date, and conversations with the involved parties. I assumed that the guidelines and setbacks recommended in this report would be followed. Assessments, conclusions, and opinions shared in this report are not a guarantee of any specific outcome. If I I 1 BO FIRESTONE TREES&GARDENS BUSARA FIRESTONE,CERTIFIED ARBORIST#WE-8525A 2150 LACEY DR.,MILPITAS,CA 95035 61 SM RCA E: BUSARA@BOFIRESTONE.COM P:(408)497-7158 Registered Consulting Arborist® # # WWW.BOFIRESTONE.COM 11226 Bubb Rd., Lot C• 08/14/22 Community Development Department Tree Impact Assessment Planning Division — Cupertino Page 2 of 13 CuFLRTINQ APPROVED Case # add itionTFdraW2 $(such as engineering or landscape plans) is provided for my review, these be subject to change. Approval Body: Director/ Staff Approval Date 02/02/23 Signature -, rk,jv i a Vaa Manager DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT & TREE STOCK After review of proposed site plan L1 (2/15/22 by Gregory Lewis Landscape Architect), it was my understanding that Lot C would be split from the original property and developed with a new two-story house, driveway and hardscaping, and a developed landscape. Trees on and overhanging the property were a mix of conifers, palms, and one (1) coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia). These trees were labeled #73 - #79 in this report. The trees were in "fair" to "good" condition overall. Please see attached tree inventory and map for measurements, condition ratings and locations. TREES TO BE REMOVED Tree #76 (Mexican fan palm, Washingtonia robusta, 2 X 15" DBH): this double-trunked palm was within the footprint of the new landscape retaining wall. This relatively low-value tree would need to be removed for the landscaping to be installed as planned. The tree would incur"severe" impact (loss of 100% roots and trunk) during installation of this landscape improvement. Please see attached tree inventory for summary of tree impact and suitability assessments. Tree#78(Douglas fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii, 12" DBH): This species was not listed as protected under City code. Therefore, removal and replacement with a typical screening tree along the fence is acceptable so that the grounds may be landscaped as the developer desires. Tree#79 (blue atlas cedar, Cedrus atlantica, 16" DBH): this tree was within the footprint of the new sidewalk and would need to be removed for the hardscaping to be installed. The tree would incur"severe" impact (root loss>30%) during installation of this landscape improvement. Please see attached tree inventory for summary of tree impact and suitability assessments. PREPARED BY: BUSARA FIRESTONE ISA-CERTIFIED ARBORIST#WE-8525A WWW.BOFIRESTONE.COM 11226 Bubb Rd., Lot C• 08/14/22 Community Development Department Tree Impact Assessment Planning Division — Cupertino Page 3 of 13 CUPERTINO APPROVED Case# PRIVACWWOMM ASSESSMENT Application Number(s) It as my assessme that as defined by Cupertino City Code Chapter 19.28.070D, that Trees Approval B#d• Dire for/St Jco aktand #75 (blue atlas cedar, Cedrus atlantica) provided adequate privacy Approva I Date � � scree111116 UI LIM! VICWbIICU dIUFIr, LIM eastern property line. These were large evergreen trees Signaturem� Case Manager CONCLUSIONS Trees#73 - #75 and #77 would incur root loss of no more than 10%from the project and may be preserved. Tree #76 (palm) and Tree#79 (cedar) would be expected to sustain "severe" impacts from the project and therefore had "low" suitability for retainment. If a suitable mitigation is prescribed as per City regulations, removal of trees#76, #78, #79 would be justified for the economic development of the parcel. If the parties involved have any questions, please feel free to contact me at busara@bofirestone.com or (408) 497-7158. Sincerely, Bo Firestone ISA Certified Arborist WE-#8525A I ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist RCA#758 I ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor I ASCA Tree and Plant Appraisal Qualification I Member—American Society of Consulting Arborists Wildlife-Trained Arborist PREPARED BY: BUSARA FIRESTONE ISA-CERTIFIED ARBORIST#WE-8525A WWW.BOFIRESTONE.COM r �t r a r �t 1 1 • �^� � •by. .T M�, r~ s "ia s4 1 s.1rZ'� d Z , �•Se" r1 f "_ -- ; shk }Zr WIN v�. e^ f D ,► i 6ti �'v�, T''� J� / 4�? � r y ✓ y1� �� V'" � Y 1 .yi r L ' xS �}ikSI pPJ{'.t1� � a ti 1 nn wo IV jA ., R 1� .✓ys i i ✓� .'i'aBl1 91IIf0 ❑IIIL~M,!j # h - ' ,hYr r ,r •�1•=,.-. tea- 5��..g� '�_� ' S .t�9 11226 Bubb Rd., Lot C• 08/14/22 Community Development Department Tree Impact Assessment Planning Division — Cupertino Page 7 of 13 CUPERTINO APPROVED Case# TR-2022-038 Application Number(s) Approval Body: Director/ Staff Approva l Date 02/02/2,3 Signature Emi Su i Ca ana er TREE#77: 21" coast live oak Provides privacy screen along eastern + x' property line along with adjacent Tree#75. `` Taken by B. Firestone 08/03/21 x PREPARED BY: BUSARA FIRESTONE ISA-CERTIFIED ARBORIST#WE-8525A WWW.BOFIRESTONE.COM 11226 Bubb Rd., Lot C• 08/14/22 Community Development Department Tree Impact Assessment Planning Division — Cupertino Page 8 of 13 CUPERTINO APPROVED Case# TR-2022-038 Application Numbers) Approval Body: Director/ Staff Approval Date Signature Emi Suqiyama Case Manager i sue, Y N� Hye TREE#78: 12" Douglas fir(Pseudotsugo menziesii) TO BE REMOVED Taken by B. Firestone 08/03/21 PREPARED BY: BUSARA FIRESTONE ISA-CERTIFIED ARBORIST#WE-8525A WWW.BOFIRESTONE.COM - 1 1 9� r 9> _ 43, 4 a ",� �� ..aye, �� ✓ ✓/ y ty> 7 y i 344 .yam, • 4 1 LWJ W M LOI •— • • err,t y ,v y a�.� • • a� ON .TA j a ! t 3 ,.i� d h ��: S"• ff �ti' . ��AAy GGGGGG�� i�'. "'r\r-�,• k*r,�� 1�.:- :4 1 ��, oaf++'� � _ ,. .� • / ' X _ !� i 11226 Bubb Rd., Lot C• 08/14/22 Community Development Department Tree Impact Assessment Planning Division — Cupertino Page 11 of 13 CUPERTINO APPROVED Case# (_11 n S SJh2022-038 — -ApplicatiGn-Nurrmb-er-(s A rovaI Bodvv pirector t {{%� pp DSIi: �UL� L� �above grade. SPREAD: Diameter of canopy between farthest branch tips Approva I Date UL L CONDITION-Ground based visual assessment of structural and physiological well-being: Signature Emi Suqiyama "Excel temIIarraal- 100%; Good health and structure with significant size, location or quality. "Good" =61-80%; Normal vigor,full canopy, no observable significant structural defects, many years of service life remaining. "Fair" =41-60%; Reduced vigor, significant structural defect(s), and/or other significant signs of stress "Poor" =21-40%; In potentially irreversible decline, structure an aesthetics severely compromised "Very Poor" =6-20%; Nearly dead, or high risk of failure, negative contribution to the landscape "Dead/Unstable" =0-5%; No live canopy/buds or failure imminent AGE: Relative to the lifespan of the tree; "Young"<1/3; "Mature" 1/3-2/3; "Overmature" >2/3 IMPACT: Anticipated impact to an individual tree including...... SEVERE- In direct conflict, removal necessary if plans proceed (distance to root cuts/fill within 3X DBH or root loss of>30%anticipated). HIGH—Work planned within 6X DBH and/or anticipated root loss of 20%—30%. Redesign to reduce impact should be explored and may be required by municipal reviewer. Retainment may be possible with monitoring or alternative building methods. Health and structure may worsen even if conditions for retainment are met. MODERATE- Ideal TPZ encroached upon in limited areas. No work or very limited work within 6X TPZ. Anticipated root loss of 10%-25%. Special building guidelines may be provided by Project Arborist. Although some symptoms of stress are possible,tree is not likely to decline due to construction related activities. LOW-Anticipated root loss of less than 10%. Minor or no encroachment on ideal TPZ. Longevity uncompromised with standard protection. VERY LOW- Ideal TPZ well exceeded. Potential impact only by ingress/egress. Anticipated root loss of 0%-5%. Longevity uncompromised. NONE- No anticipated impact to roots,soil environment, or above-ground parts. TOLERANCE: General species tolerance to construction (GOOD, MODERATE, or POOR) as given in Managing Trees During Construction, Second Edition, by International Society of Arboriculture SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT: An individual tree's suitability for preservation considering impacts, condition, maturity,species tolerance, site characteristics, and species desirability. (HIGH, MODERATE, or LOW) PREPARED BY: BUSARA FIRESTONE ISA-CERTIFIED ARBORIST#WE-8525A WWW.BOFIRESTONE.COM Comm I �Fp-w IuTdq-FhYz_� 1226 Bubb Rd,Lot C,Cupertino pg. 12 PlaLKhi`iffet lion — Cupertino CUPERTINO PW-Tow-40-� math. TREE IMPACT ASSESSMENT r: Height Spread Suitability r Case # (inches) (inches) (feet) (feet) Tolerance Factor Radius(ft) Rating PRESERVE 7AppRr 06WNltFM,bM,) Phoenix conariensis 36 36 30 30 GOOD MATURE MODERATE 12 36 VERY LOW HIGH PRESERVE �74 oBllueeAtlas Cedar Cedrus atlantica 18 18 60 40 FAIR MATURE MODERATE 12 18 LOW MODERATE PRESERVE Approval Bod c r pe4e&taff Cedrus atlantica 18 18 40 35 FAIR MATURE MODERATE 12 18 LOW MODERATE PRESERVE 7602fykvciga Palm Washingtonio robusta (2)15 21 20 12 FAIR YOUNG MODERATE 8 14 SEVERE LOW REMOVE(X) Approval Date eVL 21 21 45 35 GOOD MATURE HIGH 8 14 LOW HIGH PRESERVE Signature MI-SU ffl"&glas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 12 12 45 25 GOOD YOUNG MODERATE 8 8 LOW HIGH REMOVE(X) 79 BleAi4sWffa er Cedrus atlantica 16 16 60 40 FAIR MATURE MODERATE 12 16 SEVERE LOW REMOVE(X) KEY: # on neighboring parcel City Street Tree proposed removal SEE GLOSSARY FOR DEFINITION OF TERMS *ASSUMES STANDARD AND SPECIAL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES ARE FOLLOWED. Prepared by Busara Firestone ISA Certified Arborist#WE-8525A Community Development Department Planning Division - Cupertino CUPERTINQ APPROVED Case # TR-2022-038 Application Number(s) 1 Approval Body: Director/ Staff — 1 Approva I Date 02/02/23 ACESignature Emi Sugiyama //-� STREET Case Manager \ .H 1 TRPF -r K?a v »w:t FRONT YARD REET EE d 13 EE d O d PC r' 41 Z ° 2% a 3 - ° d � a P, L L LM LM L LM q � W BF LM LM LM LM_ LM L q L LM LM LM LM M LB L LE P L th 2 l g q T EP U Iry Lg R L LB EP /M LB L TPZ MAP LEGEND: /M LB LB L L Lo L INLET/ DRYWELL ri EP O 1 TREE TO REMOVE SIC a P th 2 U 7 7 1 st Story 0 �1 TREE TO REMAIN 15�- ❑ a a o CD 14 10 ❑ ❑0 LO TREE ON NEIGHBORS'PROPERTY/ a DV CITY STREET TREE [ O 1 st Story d 10 9❑ 3❑ q❑ DV � W o NC VI PRIVACY TREE TO ADD TO LAND- 14 NCCD C �1 SCAPING PLAN IN RESPONSE TO (� CITY COMMENTS 7 NC a DV ❑ 0 - 0 NOTE: TREES #73, #76, #78,AND #70 WERE PLACED BY 2 d o PROJECT ARBORIST REFERRING TO EXISTING SITE PLAN - NC ( t 9❑ LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. Ln NC ° a3❑ NC co 00 10 q 1stSto NC 14 15 0 CNC 15 4 15 10 1 st Story / 4 a 16 ® ( •I/ NC a a / LP 7 ma Kid's R ° 3 Play Area LP 15 Bark 0 I /LY w W Lawn 15 w Kid's w w W W Play Area 15 LP W w w DV 12 Bark 14 w Ex.21"CA Live Oak . / to remain DATE: 17 LP DV b),o 08/14/22 L Steps as required Retaining wall to maintain ° 12 existing grade under trees 7 14 DV ° o DV Q. 17 TPZ ELEMENTS DRAWN: 9 �v • I B. FIRESTONE 17 ISA-CERTIFIED ARBORIST 12 #WE-8525A P Ex.8", 13"Ce ° to remain Kid's a) 0 E ._ 17 Play Area = U 14 Bark 3 C Ex.3x10"Cedar [5 7 Play Area to remain w.o BASE MAP: SITE PLAN L1 12 17 Bark 14 by GREGORY LEWIS PGO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1 (02/15/2022) J O O O O PG o 10 -0�l PG 51 0 0 p' 5' 1 p' — �Landscape Privacy Scr ening-PG max 10'OC _ ARBORIST REPORT p9. 13 DocuSign Envelope ID:C7407D4F-944A-491E-B57B-05A6FB73104E ammmunity Development Department Planning Division — Cupertino CUPERTINO APPROVED Case# TR-2022-038 Application Number(s) Approve-1 /Staff Approval Date 02/02/23 City of Cupertino SignpiNriong ciPn y,,$wiyama Case Manager Dear Planner: The 16" Blue Atlas Cedar tree of 11226 Bubb Road, lot C is located on the future public works. I would like to request tree removal and replace it with a 24" box of crape myrtle in the front yard.This replacement tree will serve as the front yard tree for a new two-story building as well. Sincerely, DocuSigned by: fir f�%L Tracy I"ISUC665F3069E4E2_ Owner