Written CommunicationsParks and Recreation, Bicycle
Pedestrian, and Sustainability
Commissions
Special Joint Meeting
September 8, 2022
Written Communications
Item 1
Consider an update on Fiscal
Year 2021-22 City Work Program
item regarding the Blackberry
Farm Golf Course Needs
Assessment
From:Edson Whitehurst
To:City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission; City of Cupertino Bike and Ped Commission; City of
Cupertino Sustainability Commission
Subject:Sept 8 meeting and BBFGC
Date:Wednesday, September 7, 2022 1:35:17 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I wanted to offer comments on the future of Blackberry Farm Golf Course. I have been playing at
BBFGC for over 25 years. I am also a member and past president of the Blue Pheasant Hackers, a golf
league which has been playing at BBFGC since 1976. We even still have one founding member
playing. Over the 47 years of its existence, the Hackers have had many members, at its height, over
90. It has been a great source of comradery and interaction.
Over the 25+ years I’ve been playing at BBFGC, it has become a second home. I cannot imagine how
my life would be different without it. All the friends and relationships over the years. I have met
people form all ages and walks of life and all over the world. There is no other place (or golf course)
like it.
It seems to me that if the decision was being made over an empty, unused piece of land, the
arguments for both sides, and the considerations overall, would be completely different. But we are
talking about destroying something to replace it with something else. And I intentionally used the
word ‘destroy’, because once it’s gone, there will never be another. It will never be rebuilt, newly
built, or anything. It will be gone forever. Natural Habitats can be built, created, recreated, almost
anywhere. And very likely will in the future whatever the decision on this particular plot of land.
There WILL BE more (and that is a good thing).
But there will NEVER be another place like Blackberry Farm Golf Course. Once it’s gone, it’s gone.
Where many people over the years learned to play golf. Friends and families from all over the bay
area (and the world for that matter) have met and gathered. Children as young as 6 learning to play
with their parents, to retirees in their 80’s and 90’s. I’ve met parents who learned to play at BBFGC
when they were kids, bringing their children for the first time. I’m almost in tears thinking of all the
friends and people I have met who have moved on from this world. All the people, moments,
memories, and the possibility of future friends and moments and memories that will never happen.
It really breaks my heart.
Just my two cents I hope you take into consideration on this very difficult, and momentous decision.
Edson Whitehurst
From:Charles Crane
To:City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission; City of Cupertino Bike and Ped Commission; City of
Cupertino Sustainability Commission
Cc:City Clerk; City Council
Subject:Blackberry Farm Golf Course
Date:Thursday, September 8, 2022 10:56:37 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
September 9, 2022
Dear Cupertino Commissioners and City Council,
I urge the city to keep the golf course Option A. Please do not replace it with natural
plantings Option B. I am a retired fire chief and I am writing you to caution the city
against considering Option B because it would create a health and safety hazard to
nearby homes. Replacing the irrigated golf course with natural habitat creates a
Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) issue which increases the hazards of wildfire. Recent
days further show that we are entering a period of extreme weather which will further
aggravate the situation. Additionally, the city has drastically underestimated the cost of
maintaining this land once the watering stops. Keeping the underbrush short enough to
prevent a wildfire risk is not feasible. The golf course greens provide natural fire breaks.
One only needs to look at the fires that approached Silverado Golf course in Napa just a
short time ago. In this case the fires came from outside of the golf course, but the golf
course served as a natural fire break, saving many other homes. If not for any other
reason, the City of Cupertino should retain the Blackberry Farm Golf Course to protect its
citizens from fire.
Sincerely,
Charles Crane
BC Retired
--
Charles Crane
Director of Emergency Services
O: 844-623-3946 ext. 710
M: 415-377-8888
E: 1-800-262-7387
1570 Wistaria Lane, Los Altos, CA
94024
From:Don Halsey
To:City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission
Cc:Jim Lee; Mehul Dholakia
Subject:Slides to be presented at 9/8 P&R meeting
Date:Thursday, September 8, 2022 4:18:21 PM
Attachments:Slides for Parks and Rec on 9-8-22 r00.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I have registered to make comments during tonight's meeting. I would like to share this
document / visual material so the slides can be presented during item 1 E (Analysis of
Comparative Costs ...). I will have 2 co-presenters, Jim Lee and Mehul Dholakia, both
Cupertino residents. I might have another person from our group "Friends of Blackberry Farm
golf" attend the meeting virtually. If so I think we will have 8 minutes to present.
Thank You
Don Halsey
650 996 3021
Public Comments
to
Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission
about
Blackberry Farm Golf vs. Natural Habitat
9/8/22
Friends of Blackberry Farm Golf
Contacts: Don Halsey 650 996 3021 or donhalsey3021@gmail.com
Next Door group: https://nextdoor.com/city/cupertino--ca/
(E) Blackberry Farm Course
Use Analysis and Comparative Costs –25
Year Outlook
2 ways golf course revenue can be increased
Quick overview of Costs and Revenue
https://engagecupertino.org/bbfgolfcourse
But golf course makes a LOT more revenue.
Golf course costs the city more!
Altogether, golf course is $2
million more favorable
Other nearby 9 hole courses charge at least 20% more than Blackberry Farm
Pruneridge
Deep Cliff
28% more
22%
44%
Table from Blackberry
Farm Feasibility Study
•https://engagecupertino.org/bbfgolfcourse
•Sunken Gardens: 28% premium
•Pruneridge: 22% premium
•Deep Cliff: 44% premium
•If estimated revenue was increased 25% it
would grow by $2,344 656 to $11,723,280.
•City could give the $2.3 M extra to
Cupertino teachers
•Or give a number of free season passes to
Monta Vista HS golf team
•Or some other good purpose.
Second way: Education
•$500 K revenue under the Natural Habitat option
•$20 K / year x 25 years
•A variety of ranger programs in classroom or on
the trail
•how different plants and animals interact in an
ecosystem …
•how ancient people lived off the land …
•how geologic processes have shaped the
landscape …
•ranger walks and interpretive programs …
•animals and plants on the trail, the creeks, etc.
Examples of courses and venues
(Parks and Recreation brochure, Fall 2022)
•Q: Is the $500K of courses duplicative to courses already
being offered? Perhaps.
•Q: Is the plowing up the fairways and greens required in
order to give courses? No.
•Q: Will course subscribers repeat, or will the revenue tail
off?
•A: Offer the new courses whether or not there is golf.
•Add $500K to Alternative A side of the table also.
Blackberry Farm is
Cupertino’s best location for
kids to get exposed to golf
Blackberry Farm golf –a family-oriented activity in Cupertino
•Youth On Course foundation
•Blackberry farm is #13 out of 357 YOC courses in
Northern California
•It is the ONLY course that does not have day or time
restriction.
•Since 2018, YOC has subsidized more than 7,600
rounds of golf at Blackberry Farm for community
youth.
•Those 7,600 rounds equate to tens of thousands of
hours of physical activity, lifeskill development, and
recreation that would go away if the course was
closed.
•Nearly 2,500 of those rounds were in 2021.
•There are few other options available for kids and
their families to play golf in and around the local
area. Add statistics for BBF by itself
Availability of short / 9-hole courses
From:EAC Chair
To:City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission; City of Cupertino Bike and Ped Commission; City of
Cupertino Sustainability Commission
Cc:Shani Kleinhaus; director@scvas.org; Ranif@scvas.org
Subject:Public Comment – Item 1: BBF Golf Course
Date:Thursday, September 8, 2022 4:34:46 PM
Attachments:Cupertino Joint Commissions – BBF Golf Course.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Chairs and Commissioners of the Parks and Recreation Commission, Bicycle Pedestrian
Commission, and Sustainability Commission,
Please see attached for our comments.
Regards,
Annie Yang
Annie Yang
Environmental Action Committee ChairSanta Clara Valley Audubon Society
22221 McClellan RdCupertino, CA 95014
eac@scvas.org
September 8, 2022
RE:Item 1 –Consider an update on Fiscal Year 2021-22 City Work Program item regarding the
Blackberry Farm Golf Course Needs Assessment
Dear Chairs and Commissioners of the Parks and Recreation Commission,Bicycle Pedestrian
Commission, and Sustainability Commission,
The Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society (SCVAS)is one of the largest National Audubon
Society chapters in California.We are proud to be based at McClellan Ranch in Cupertino,right
next to Blackberry Farm.Our mission is to promote the enjoyment,understanding,and
protection of birds and other wildlife,and we have long advocated for increasing and protecting
habitat that increases biodiversity.We are writing in support of Option B,conversion of the
Blackberry Farm (BBF) Golf Course to natural habitat.
Conversion of the golf course to natural habitat not only saves a valuable resource,water,but
will also add habitat value to the Stevens Creek corridor,an important wildlife corridor.
Especially in our current extreme drought conditions,choosing an option that uses 90%less
water seems wise.Besides the water savings,the increase in wildlife habitat will add to the
ability of the City to support biodiversity.In a time when we are seeing massive bird loss and
insect declines,every bit of land planted with native plants that supports a healthy ecosystem
helps.This is especially important along riparian corridors,such as Stevens Creek,where good
quality habitat is often threatened and fragmented in the South Bay.Connecting BBF to the rest
of the Stevens Creek Corridor will provide a valuable connection of habitat.
We join the majority of the public survey respondents from Cupertino (57%)in favoring Option
B.The amazing number of participants who want to see the site converted to natural habitat
shows that bolstering natural ecosystems while providing more equitable enjoyment of the
space is a popular choice in a time when we need to actively mitigate human impact on the
climate and the environment.BBF and McClellan Ranch Preserve are popular birding areas for
both beginner and experienced birders,with Anna’s Hummingbirds,Acorn Woodpeckers,
Chestnut-backed Chickadees,Red-breasted Sapsuckers,White-breasted Nuthatches,Brown
Creepers,California Towhees,Red-shouldered and Red-tailed hawks,and many others easily
spotted there.Improving the value of this stretch of riparian and grassland habitat will help these
birds and other wildlife,such as the threatened steelhead trout.SCVAS already offers
educational opportunities there,and we will be happy to partner with the City and Park Rangers
to provide more ways for the public to appreciate and learn about our natural spaces.
The golf course as it stands today provides some habitat value;however,if the City chooses
Option A,we strongly recommend adding wildlife habitat as an improvement to the golf course.
Native vegetation should be added to the edges of the golf course.The ponds should be
restored,and trees added.Complex vegetation structure should be used wherever possible.
Additional netting should be avoided.Although we prefer Option B,we urge the City to make
maximizing habitat value as a goal in either option.The City of Mountain View recently passed a
Citywide Biodiversity Strategy through which it will integrate biodiversity outcomes into all
private development and City projects and policies. We encourage Cupertino to do the same.
As stated on the Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan,“expanding access to
nature is a top priority for the community,”and “residents would like to see a decreased
emphasis on large lawn areas and more focus on retaining a site’s natural character”(p.18).
We hope that you take this opportunity to choose to rewild an important connection for wildlife
and return a small part of land back to nature.The benefits will outlast all of us who are here
today.
Regards,
Annie Yang
Cupertino Resident
Environmental Action Committee Chair
Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society
22221 McClellan Rd
Cupertino, CA 95014
eac@scvas.org
From:Rhoda Fry
To:City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission; City of Cupertino Bike and Ped Commission; City of
Cupertino Sustainability Commission
Cc:City Clerk; City Council
Subject:September 8 2022 Agenda Item #1 Keep Golf Course
Date:Thursday, September 8, 2022 4:48:54 PM
Attachments:091113 (1).pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Commissions,
The following outlines the reasons to retain the golf course and includes some questions about this
agenda item. I am not a golfer and have no intent on becoming a golfer but the golf course fills a
unique niche within our City’s recreational offerings where people of all ages can exercise, enjoy the
great outdoors, and play. Recent data shows that 41,000 people per year have used the golf course
and I’m guessing it would be more if tee times were less spread out because the times between tee
times has been expanded during covid. I doubt we can say the same for the teen center or the pools
at Blackberry Farm. Consider also that people from outside of Cupertino who use the golf course
also shop Cupertino while they’re in the area and increase our City’s tax revenue!
Question 1: Can you explain where the projected $20K in revenue would come from with the new
venue? It does not seem very different from McClellan Ranch where there already is some
programming. If there were more programming, it seems that it could happen at McClellan Ranch.
By adding programming to McClellan Ranch and retaining the golf course would add revenue and
maintain a diversity of recreational options. Please explain what projected programming would be
and how it would differ from other programming.
Question 2: In the reconfigured golf course, one of the holes is changed to reduce golf balls in the
golf course parking lot. I heard it mentioned on an open-house that the reconfiguration would be for
balls within the orange orchard. Can you explain? Also, what would be done to resolve other issues
with errant golf balls from the golf course such as those along the entrance driveway to the
pool/picnic area?
Question 3: Over the years, a number of trees have died and been removed on the golf course.
Many of them were Monterey Pines, whose life expectancy is only about 50 years. Why were the
trees not replaced?
Question 4: Does the golf course have a dedicated water meter and pg&e meter? How do we know
what the actual utility costs are?
Survey: It seems to me that the survey was leading the respondent in a direction to select “natural
habitat.” However, the actual proposal looks more like a city park with a parcourse, education area,
and a 40-car parking lot that would eat into the existing golf course at the swimming pool area. If I
were asked if baseball fields, soccer fields, library field and more were to be converted to natural
habitat and walking trails would I use them? I’d say sure. But it doesn’t mean that I think we should
get rid of them. I remember a former councilmember saying that surveys were designed to create a
desired outcome.
2006 Golf Course Plan: Please ask the Parks and Recreation staff to refer to the 2006 plan pertaining
to the golf course. The 2000 vision is mentioned but not the plan. Much of that plan was built out,
but not all of it.
A) The 2006 plan replaced the aging irrigation system. My recollection is that the cost was estimated
to be $250K. I searched through the City’s public documents, but could not find the cost.
B) The 2006 plan summary intended to refurbish onsite water: “Damaged water storage tank that
held well water to irrigate the golf course would be demolished. An existing 35,000 gallon
underground cistern would be reconditioned to provide irrigation for the golf course.” Around 2012
there was an extensive study to investigate using onsite water vs potable San Jose water at the golf
course.
C) The plan was emphatic about retaining the ponds, affectionately referred to by many as lakes.
These ponds had become a naturalized wildlife habitat that was teeming with wildlife that included a
substantive red-wing blackbird population and a regular green heron among others. The plan
mentioned the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s keen interest in retaining these ponds.
The 2006 plan summary stated, “No change in side-stream diversion to golf course ponds.” Several
Parks and Rec Directors assured me these ponds would be restored (along with replanting the 30 or
so trees that failed in the new parking lot adjacent to the pools).
Environment: The golf course has been host to quite a bit of wildlife including several coyotes,
hawks, woodpeckers and more. As mentioned previously, the ponds were a unique naturalized
wildlife habitat. And there are many trees on the golf course and there could be more. Many areas
of the golf course are not being watered now and they could be replaced with natural habitat. And
there could be more trees – especially to replace the ones that died. Golf courses and natural
habitat are not mutually exclusive – we can have both. Another benefit to the adjacent
neighborhood is that the wide open areas are less attractive to mountain lions, so having a golf
course would be better than natural habitat. In the past, a mountain lion entered the animal
enclosure at McClellan Ranch and ate a goat. Another mountain lion hung out in a tree for several
days adjacent to McClellan Ranch as well.
Fire Safety: The golf course provides a firebreak for the homes up on Byrne Avenue and beyond. The
City’s most important job is to protect the safety of its inhabitants and there needs to be a significant
amount of irrigated area to protect them. Attached please find one of many articles written on this
topic. And we have a record of fire issues within the “Stevens Creek Corridor.” In 2022 and possibly
2021, people had been setting a fire in McCllelan Ranch in the middle of the night about once a
month. You can still see the scorch marks where it happened. One of my neighbors walked by one
morning and saw that it was still smoldering and called the authorities. We were lucky. Over at the
Stocklmeir property, there had been some sort of calamity that caused the windows to be boarded
up. Later, a resident lodged multiple complaints to the City and the Fire Department about the dried
brush around the building adjacent to the townhouses. Thankfully, the City cleaned up the area but
it is hard to understand how it stayed a safety hazard until a resident complained about it. I am
worried that natural plantings could get out of hand as it did at the Stocklmeir house.
Money: It seems that the fees charged for the golf course are very low. An increase of just $1 or $2
could make a big difference. When the City runs programs that look like businesses, they are run
through Enterprise Funds which provides a Profit and Los Statement for that business. In the past,
pool/picnic and golf shared the same enterprise fund. At some point, pool/picnics were removed
and we have no idea as to what that facility is costing us. As to golf course, in my opinion, there have
been charges for the enterprise fund that do not belong there and make it look like the golf course is
performing worse than it actually is. For example, studies to modify or remove the golf course have
been charged to the enterprise fund. Consequently, for people who don’t know the details, golf
performance look worse than it is. It seems that the golf course has been left in limbo for quite some
time – as previously mentioned, we already should have had the new watering system in place, the
ponds should have been left intact to support wildlife, and trees should have been replaced. We
need to get more transparency for the businesses that are run by the City.
History: In 1844 Elisha Stevens led the first wagon train to cross the Sierra Nevada and from 1848
until 1862 he lived in a small home in Cupertino near Blackberry Farm’s playground stands today. At
the time, the creek was called Cupertino creek and it has since been renamed to Stevens Creek.
Although there is a California Historical Landmark for his final home in Bakersfield, there is none for
his first home. In the later 1800s people would arrive by stagecoach and enjoy picnicking at the
creek. Later, people arrived by train. The land now occupied by the golf course had been an orchard
failed. Recognizing a business opportunity, two brothers purchased the property in the 1950s, built 2
homes along the driveway, and created a picnic business followed by swimming pools, the golf
course, and the restaurant/nightclub. It was at this time that access to the picnic area from Stevens
Creek blvd ceased. The family had considered purchasing some of the Stocklmeir property in order
to provide an entrance to the picnic grounds from Stevens Creek blvd because neighbors had been
impacted.
In 1990, Cupertino citizens voted to tax themselves the utility tax to purchase the property for open
space, save the oak trees, and prevent housing development. Keep in mind that in 1990, the
majority of the homes around that property were in unincorporated County. The pool/picnic
business would continue to be run by the city for 25 years in order to pay for the property (it ceased
operating well before that). Although pool/picnics and golf had been profitable for the family, the
pool/picnic business lost money and golf made money for the City. Sometime after the area was
renovated, only golf was tracked through an enterprise fund. When you go to the golf course, you
will see a sign that says Don Brown on it. I haven’t seen the name anywhere else. Don Brown was
Cupertino’s City manager at the time of the City’s purchase of the pool/picnic area, the golf course,
and the Blue Pheasant. As you can see, I am into some of the history and was glad to learn that
former City architect Terry Greene had interviewed the Nelson family about the history of Blackberry
Farm. I hope that his notes are still around. Part of the “Stevens Creek Corridor” project was to have
some historical signage and I hope that comes to fruition someday.
Long story short – let’s keep the golf course – it is good for the community.
Thanks,
Rhoda Fry
Golf course turf, in
addition to the
requirement of a fuel
modifi cation zone on
slopes, helped save
dozens of homes in the
path of the Yorba Linda
fi r e i n 2 0 0 8 .
The many benefi ts of turf have been well
documented in scientifi c literature. Add
to that list the fact that golf courses and
large turf areas serve a valuable role as
fi rebreaks.
Wildfi res occur frequently throughout the
Southwest, causing extensive devastation and
property damage. It is reported that more than
1,445 structures each year are destroyed by wild-
fi res in California. At the same time, it is impor-
tant to note that many structures are saved as a
result of the fi rebreaks created by large turf areas
and landscaping techniques that minimize the
spread of fi res to homes and structures (CAL
FIRE, 2005).
Complicating matters is the fact that drought
conditions in the Southwest over the past eight
years have put pressure on turf managers to
reduce water use, either by voluntary or man-
datory means. The prevailing opinion by water
regulators and politicians is that turf irrigation
is wasteful. On the contrary, there are many
examples indicating that healthy, well-watered
golf courses and large turf areas have played an
important role in stopping wildfi res and
protecting property.
NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2009 13
Golf Courses on the Fire Line
Golf courses and large turf areas serve a valuable role as fi rebreaks.
BY PATRICK GROSS
DEVASTATION CAUSED BY FIRE
Fire-fi ghting experts refer to three essential
components of wildfi res, known as “the fi re
triangle” — fuel, heat, and oxygen. Eliminating
one of these components helps slow or stop the
fi re. Firebreaks remove fuel. Water helps reduce
heat. Flame retardants block oxygen from
reaching the fuel (Riggs, 2002).
The height, type, and spacing of plants impact
the intensity and spread of a fi re. In many wild-
fi res, a “ladder effect” is created when fi re
sweeps through low-growing brush and climbs
into the canopy of nearby trees, where fl ames
and embers can be spread greater distances
(Nader, 2007). In particular, live embers from a
fi re have been known to travel up to one mile,
landing on brush and structures and accelerating
the spread of the fi re.
Each wildfi re will spread and behave differ-
ently depending on wind, terrain, humidity,
weather conditions, and the amount of fuel. The
only factor that can be controlled by human
activity is the amount of fuel available to sustain
a fi re. Structures surrounded by dense, dry brush
and closely spaced trees are at high risk of fi re
damage. At lower risk are properties with a
defense zone of at least 100 feet that includes
well-watered turf and landscape plants.
BENEFITS OF TURF
AND GOLF COURSES
IN FIRE-PRONE AREAS
Although fi re experts warn that there is no such
thing as a plant that will not burn, previous
experience in California indicates that well-
watered and properly maintained landscapes did
not burn as readily as dry plantings (Youngner,
1970). Plants that are low growing, open struc-
tured, and less resinous, such as turf, present a
lower fi re risk (Nader, 2007). Additional benefi ts
14 GREEN SECTION RECORD
Golf courses provide
large open areas with
low fuel volume that
create a defensible
space in fi re-prone
areas. In addition, water
hazards on golf courses
can be used as a source
of water to fi ght fi res.
of large turf areas and golf courses in fi re-prone
areas are noted below:
• Healthy turf is less likely to burn due to the
high water content within the plant tissue,
which ranges from 75% to 85% by weight
(Beard, 1974).
• The low, prostrate growth habit of maintained
turf limits the amount of fuel available to sustain
a fi re (Beard and Green, 1994).
• Golf courses provide large open areas with a
low fuel volume that create a defensible space in
fi re-prone areas. This establishes an effective
fi rebreak, placing more distance between fi re
and nearby structures. Golf courses are especially
helpful in stopping the spread of fi re when situ-
ated on the side of the prevailing wind (Riggs,
2002).
• Trees growing on golf courses are less likely to
ignite because the turf beneath limits the avail-
able fuel source, thus stopping the “ladder effect.”
• Wind-blown embers start many house fi res.
Golf courses and large turf areas create distance
between combustible vegetation and homes,
creating more area for embers to potentially fade
(Anderson, 2009).
• Water hazards on golf courses are sometimes
used as a source of water to fi ght fi res.
• For fi refi ghters, the open space provided by
golf courses has been used as a staging area for
equipment and personnel as well as the fi re
command center (Liske, 2009).
• Golf courses provide an escape route and safe
zone for fi refi ghters should the direction and
intensity of the fi re change and the fi refi ghters
need to evacuate the area (Liske, 2009).
GOLF COURSES ON THE FIRE LINE
Wildfi res have been a common occurrence
throughout California for decades, and recent
experience indicates that golf courses have
served a valuable role by creating fi rebreaks to
stop the spread of fi res as noted in the following
examples.
Simi/Vale Verde fi re, October 2003:
In October 2003, a wildfi re consumed 750,000
acres north of Los Angeles, destroying 3,500
homes and causing 22 deaths. Tierra Rejada Golf
Club in Moorpark, California, was in the path
of the fi re. According to general manager Tom
Szwedzinksi, the fi rebreak created by the golf
course prevented the fl ames from crossing Hwy.
22 into a densely populated Moorpark neighbor-
hood (Bailey, 2003).
Ramona fi re, October 2003: During the
same time of the fi res north of Los Angeles,
fl ames swept through the chaparral-covered hill-
sides of Ramona, in north San Diego County.
The San Diego Country Estates development on
the outskirts of Ramona borders the San Vicente
Inn & Golf Club, which helped stop and redirect
the fi re away from homes in a portion of the
development. Only 27 of the 3,000 homes in the
subdivision were lost to the fi re. According to
Captain Dave Hypes of the California Depart-
ment of Forestry and Fire Protection, the green
grass didn’t allow the fi re to spread and the golf
NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2009 15
The intense heat
generated by wildfi res
destroys homes and
damages property,
including this irrigation
controller on the
border of Black Gold
Golf Course in
Yorba Linda, California.
course created a very nice fi rebreak (Bailey,
2003).
Yorba Linda fi re, October 2008: With the
help of strong Santa Ana winds, a brush fi re that
started in Corona, California, rapidly moved
west toward the neighboring city of Yorba
Linda. Several homes in the path of the fi re were
destroyed as it burned through the chaparral-
covered hillsides and up to the edge of Black
Gold Golf Course. The golf course stopped
fl ames from reaching the housing development
on the southern edge of the property. According
to Bret Anderson with the Orange County Fire
Authority, there were several factors that helped
stop the fi res and spare the surrounding homes:
• The golf course put more distance between
the combustible vegetation and the homes. This
provided more area for wind-driven embers to
fade.
• The green grass on the golf course was less
combustible than the brush on the hillside.
Although turf along the edge of the course was
scorched, it did not sustain the fi re.
• A fuel modifi cation zone around the homes
was required during development. These areas
were established with fi re-resistant plants and
also prevented fi res from reaching the homes
(Anderson, 2009).
Griffi th Park fi re, May 2007: A discarded
cigarette started a brush fi re in the Aberdeen
Canyon area of Griffi th Park in Los Angeles.
The terrain and heavy winds created very erratic
fi re conditions that ultimately burned 800 acres
and damaged one home. As the fi re changed
direction and moved southward, it stopped at the
edge of the Roosevelt Golf Course and Tregnan
Golf Academy. According to senior arson
investigator David Liske, the golf courses were
great fi rebreaks that saved dozens of expensive
homes south of the golf course (Liske, 2009).
Roosevelt Golf Course also served as a landing
area for helicopters that were used for aerial
observation and to direct fi refi ghters on the
ground.
SUMMARY
Aside from being an aesthetic element of the
landscape, turf is a practical environmental tool
as a fi re barrier in addition to the other benefi ts
of providing erosion control, producing a cool-
ing effect, and trapping pollution particulates.
As noted in the previous examples, golf courses
served a valuable function as fi rebreaks due to
the low fuel content of the green, prostrate-
growing turf. The green belt created by golf
courses was especially important as a buffer
for homes and buildings adjacent to extensive
woodland and dryland chaparral. In fi refi ghting
terms, expansive turf areas and golf courses
create a defensible area that not only stops the
spread of a fi re but also can be used as a staging
area and safety zone for fi re department
personnel.
In times of drought, turfgrass irrigation is
often deemed to be wasteful. This often results
in political pressure to eliminate golf course
irrigation and remove turf from landscapes.
Ironically, areas affected by drought tend to be a
greater fi re risk, and expansive turf areas, such as
golf courses, serve a practical role in reducing
fi re danger. When it comes to reducing fi re
hazard, it is important to recognize that the
benefi ts of turfgrass far outweigh the water
requirement.
REFERENCES
Anderson, Bret. 2009. Orange County Fire Authority.
Personal communication.
Bailey, Mike. Firebreak: Courses Survive California Wild-
fi res as Flames Devour Land Around Them. Golf Week’s
Super News. November 21, 2003. 5(21):12-13.
Beard, James B. Turfgrass: Science and Culture. 1973.
Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. p. 261.
Beard, James B.; R. L. Green. The Role of Turfgrasses in
Environmental Protection and Their Benefi ts to Humans.
Journal of Environmental Quality. May-June 1994.
23(3):452-460.
Bloyd, Stephanie. Southern California Courses Spared
Wildfi res’ Worst. Golf Course Management. December
1993. 61(12):42-43.
CAL FIRE (California Dept. of Forestry and Fire
Protection). 2005. Make Your House Fire Safe. CAL
FIRE Website, http://www.fi re.ca.gov/about_content/
downloads/Defens_space_fl yer4_11fi nal.pdf.
Liske, David. 2009. Los Angeles Fire Department.
Personal communication.
Nader, Glen; G. Nakamura; M. DeLasaux; S. Quarles;
Y. Valachovic. Home Landscaping for Fire. 2007.
Oakland, California. University of California Division of
Agriculture and Natural Resources. ANR publication
8228.
Riggs, Nancy. Arizona Golf Courses Survive Fires.
Turf:West. October 2002. 12(10):B9-B11, B20.
Youngner, V. B. 1970. Landscaping to Protect Homes
from Wildfi res. California Turfgrass Culture. 20(4):28-32.
PAT GROSS is the director of the Southwest Region of
the USGA Green Section. As a lifelong resident of
California, he has seen the devastation caused by
wildfi res.
16 GREEN SECTION RECORD
From:Anne Ezzat
To:City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission; City of Cupertino Sustainability Commission
Cc:City of Cupertino Bike and Ped Commission; Darcy Paul; Kitty Moore
Subject:Golf Course
Date:Thursday, September 8, 2022 6:19:05 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear commissioners,
I am writing to urge you to keep the golf course at Blackberry Farm, though I believe golf is a
snooze-fest. It is a perfectly sized golf course for a community. And a public golf course. If
we can have a swimming pool, tennis courts, baseball fields, and cricket fields, why not a golf
course?
Furthermore, the city has not done a really good job of maintaining preserves. Look at the
overgrown brush along the Stevens Creek Trail. And the dead trees. Why do we need more
of the same? And the additional 40 parking spaces? It seems as if there is a rush to pave over
parks, and eliminate parking spaces at residential buildings. Utterly nonsensical.
Please do not turn the golf course into another unkempt nature preserve.
Thank you and best regards,
Brooke Ezzat
From:Connie Cunningham
To:City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission
Subject:Sep 8, Joint Commission Agenda Item 1
Date:Thursday, September 8, 2022 8:28:34 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I am sending this copy of my spoken remarks for the written record of this meeting. Thanks,
Connie Cunningham
Good Evening, Chairs and Commissioners of the Park and Recreation Commission, Bicycle
Pedestrian Commission and Sustainability Commission,
My name is Connie Cunningham, Member of Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society and a
longtime resident of Cupertino.
Thank you for this excellent report. Cupertino’s Blackberry Farm and McClellan Ranch are
environmental jewels in the increasingly urban environment of our County. I prefer Option B,
Restore Natural Habitat. I share that opinion with 57% of Cupertino residents who answered
the survey.
The restoration to nature will use less water, it will open the area to more people to enjoy, and
become a home to increased biodiversity based on using California native plants and trees.
I urge the City to apply for grants from the State and other resources to make the restoration
financially feasible. Fixing the irrigation system is critical to minimize the use of potable
water during drought conditions that are getting worse. Putting California native trees, shrubs
and grasses in the islands of the golf course will enhance biodiversity.
A return to nature is the best for our environment. As the South Bay becomes increasingly
crowded with development, it is critical that Blackberry Farm and the Stevens Creek riparian
area be retained as environmental jewels in our City and for the region.
I have heard the comment that golf is good for older people. However, many elderly people
can no longer golf. They may be able to walk, or to sit in a wheelchair and watch nature
around them. Teaching their grandchildren about nature will be a marvelous inheritance.
Our City has supported the environment in many ways. The Bird-safe Design and Dark Skies
Ordinance is a valuable way to preserve wildlife health and human health. Another support is
in the accomplishments of the Climate Action Plan. By adding this jewel of a property to its
open space system, the City will strengthen the sustainability of the City.
Wildlife, from fish to birds, to squirrels and rabbits, to bees and butterflies, will thrive, delight,
and strengthen coming generations of residents. Residents, current and future, will thank the
City for doing this today.
Thank you for this time to speak.
Connie Cunningham
From:Peggy Griffin
To:City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission; City of Cupertino Bike and Ped Commission
Cc:City Clerk
Subject:FW: 2022-09-08 BBF Item #1 Peggy"s Slide for Public comments
Date:Thursday, September 8, 2022 8:31:06 PM
Attachments:Peggys Comments-Dead Zone.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Commissioners,
This photo is an example of how our city is NOT able to plant and maintain natural habitat. It’s a
dead zone! The creek trail from McClellan Ranch has been closed for a long time. Additional trails
are closed because of invasive plants.
Keep the golf course!
Sincerely,
Peggy Griffin
From: Peggy Griffin <griffin@compuserve.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 7:13 PM
To: parksandrecreationcommission@cupertino.org
Cc: 'City Clerk' <CityClerk@cupertino.org>
Subject: 2022-09-08 BBF Item #1 Peggy's Slide for Public comments
Dear City Clerk,
Please display this PDF when I speak on Item #1 during this meeting.
Thank you,
Peggy Griffin