06-15-2022 Final BPC PacketCITY OF CUPERTINO
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION
AGENDA
This will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location
Wednesday, June 15, 2022
7:00 PM
Teleconference Meeting
TELECONFERENCE / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION TO HELP STOP THE
SPREAD OF COVID-19
In accordance with Government Code 54953(e), this will be a teleconference meeting
without a physical location to help stop the spread of COVID-19.
Members of the public wishing comment on an item on the agenda may do so in the
following ways:
1) E-mail comments by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 15 to the Commission at
bikepedcommission@cupertino.org. These e-mail comments will be received by the
commission members before the meeting and posted to the City’s website after the
meeting.
2) E-mail comments during the times for public comment during the meeting to the
Commission at bikepedcommission@cupertino.org. The staff liaison will read the emails
into the record, and display any attachments on the screen, for up to 3 minutes (subject to
the Chair’s discretion to shorten time for public comments). Members of the public that
wish to share a document must email bikepedcommission@cupertino .org prior to speaking.
3) Teleconferencing Instructions
Members of the public may observe the teleconference meeting or provide oral public
comments as follows:
Oral public comments will be accepted during the teleconference meeting. Comments may
be made during “oral communications” for matters not on the agenda, and during the
public comment period for each agenda item .
To address the Commission, click on the link below to register in advance and access the
meeting:
Page 1
1
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda June 15, 2022
Online
Register in advance for this webinar:
https://cityofcupertino.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_G1zxeiNuSFS8PJTcMeHCFA
Phone
Dial 669 900 6833 and enter Webinar ID: 957 2226 2170 (Type *9 to raise hand to speak)
Unregistered participants will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number .
Or an H.323/SIP room system:
H.323:
162.255.37.11 (US West)
162.255.36.11 (US East)
213.19.144.110 (Amsterdam Netherlands)
213.244.140.110 (Germany)
103.122.166.55 (Australia)
69.174.57.160 (Canada)
Meeting ID: 957 2226 2170
SIP: 95722262170@zoomcrc.com
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about
joining the webinar.
Please read the following instructions carefully:
1.You can directly download the teleconference software or connect to the meeting in your
internet browser. If you are using your browser, make sure you are using a current and
up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain
functionality may be disabled in older browsers, including Internet Explorer .
2.You will be asked to enter an email address and a name, followed by an email with
instructions on how to connect to the meeting. Your email address will not be disclosed to
the public. If you wish to make an oral public comment but do not wish to provide your
name, you may enter “Cupertino Resident” or similar designation.
3.When the Chair calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on “raise hand.”
Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak.
4.When called, please limit your remarks to the time allotted and the specific agenda
topic.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to
Page 2
2
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda June 15, 2022
attend this teleconference meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability
that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48
hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in
advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the
meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative
format.
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1.Subject: May 18, 2022 Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve May 18, 2022 Minutes
A - Draft Minutes
POSTPONEMENTS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter
within the jurisdiction of the Commission and not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect
to a matter not on the agenda.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
OLD BUSINESS
2.Subject: Future Agenda Items (Ganga)
Recommended Action: Develop and Maintain a List of Future Agenda Items for the
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
NEW BUSINESS
3.Subject: Bicycle Boulevard Project, Phase 2 (Aumentado)
Recommended Action: Receive Presentation on the Bicycle Boulevard Phase 2
Conceptual Design and Provide Direction to Staff (Action Item)
4.Subject: Regnart Creek Trail/Campo de Lozano Public Pedestrian Walkway Easement
Vacation and Rodrigues Avenue Midblock Pedestrian Crosswalk (Stillman)
Recommended Action: Consider Recommendation:
1) Vacation of Public Pedestrian Walkway Easement through Campo de Lozano; and
2) Installation of Midblock Pedestrian Crosswalk Across Rodrigues Avenue between
Torre Avenue and Blaney Avenue (Action Item)
A - Rodrigues Avenue Aerial Exhibit
Page 3
3
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda June 15, 2022
STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS
5.Subject: Staff Update and Commissioner Activity Report (All)
Recommended Action: Receive Updates from Staff and Commissioners Regarding
Recent Activities
FUTURE AGENDA SETTING
ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this
meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should
call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for
assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and
writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate
alternative format.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members after publication of the agenda will
be made available for public inspection. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office in City Hall located at
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014, during normal business hours.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code section
2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff
concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These
written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet
archives. Do not include any personal or private information in written communications to the City
that you do not wish to make public, as written communications are considered public records and will
be made publicly available on the City website.
Members of the public are entitled to address the members concerning any item that is described in the
notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the
members on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment .
Page 4
4
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
22-11111 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
Agenda #: 1.
Subject: May 18, 2022 Minutes
Approve May 18, 2022 Minutes
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 6/8/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™5
Page 1 of 7
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting
May 18, 2022
DRAFT MINUTES
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION
May 18, 2022
Draft Minutes
The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Jack Carter (VC), Gerhard Eschelbeck, Ilango Ganga (C), Grace John, Erik
Lindskog
Absent:
Staff: David Stillman, Staff Liaison
Others Present: Birgit Werner, Community Coordinator
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. April 20, 2022 Minutes
MOTION: Vice Chair Carter moved, seconded by Commissioner Eschelbeck to
approve the minutes as presented.
MOTION PASSED: 4‐0, John Absent
POSTPONEMENTS
No Postponements
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Byron Rovegno, public speaker discussed Carmen Road Bridge and the valuation placed on
that project in the budget. Regarding the Regnart Creek Trail Project, there was no completion
date listed, that he was able to see.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
David Stillman, Transportation Manager said there was one from Byron Rovegno, but he
addressed it in Oral Communications.
6
Page 2 of 7
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting
May 18, 2022
Chair Ganga saw one from Liana Crabtree. Commissioner Eschelbeck confirmed but said the
Written Communication from Liana Crabtree was related to Agenda Item five.
OLD BUSINESS
2. Future Agenda Items (Ganga)
Carmen Road Bridge
Public Places for Bike Racks (include e‐bike parking)
Education on How to Use Two‐Stage Left Turn Boxes
Path between Lincoln Elementary and Monta Vista High School
The Impact of Semi‐Rural Designation on Bike and Ped Projects/Priorities
Adaptive Traffic Signal Pilot Update
Multi‐Modal Traffic Count Pilot Update
Reassess the Intersection at Bubb Road/McClellan Road
Stevens Creek Boulevard, Phases 1‐3
Legally Allowed Behavior at Stop Signs for Bicyclists
Vision Zero
Lead Pedestrian Walk Interval
Diagonal Crosswalks
Lawson Middle School Bike Path
Input from Seniors on the Bicycle Pedestrian Improvements
Bollinger Road Safety Corridor Project
AB 43 – Summary and how Commission can support implementation
Bicycle Licensing (to prevent bike theft)
Rodriguez/Lozano Pedestrian Pathway to Regnart Creek Trail, including crossing
Improvement of existing Class IV Bike Lanes, including maintenance
Commissioner John joined the meeting at 7:24 p.m.
Byron Rovegno, public speaker suggested putting the Future Items in several buckets, or lists,
to help the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission stay organized.
NEW BUSINESS
3. School Walk Audit Update and Prioritization (Stillman)
David Stillman, Transportation Manager gave a presentation on the School Walk Audit Project
Status List, Draft School Walk Audit Project List for the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
(Commission) Consideration, and the Draft Criteria for Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Project
Engagement.
Vice Chair Carter asked why sidewalks and crosswalks were not part of the purview of the
Commission. Chair Ganga wanted to know the criteria for bringing in the Pedestrian
Improvement Projects. Mr. Stillman said, historically, Pedestrian Improvement Projects were a
7
Page 3 of 7
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting
May 18, 2022
common practice, such as converting crosswalks to high visibility crosswalks, upgrading the
striping, or the installation of America with Disability Act (ADA) ramps. Vice Chair Carter
thought of someone falling off a raised platform; he wanted to have things like these discussed
by the Commission.
Commissioner Eschelbeck thought it was good to acknowledge all the improvements made. He
said the list of projects was manageable, and all the projects mentioned were good for the
Commission to review. It was good to cast the Rules of Engagement, so they were inclusive.
Chair Ganga said, related to the Rules of Engagement, that there were vertical elements,
temporary versus permanent. Due to cost, there were some vertical elements that looked
temporary, but were permanent. Mr. Stillman relayed that the installation of posts and flexible
bollards (plastic delineators,) fell under item one of the Rules of Engagement. Permanent
change to the vertical elements was proposed to be brought before the Commission.
Chair Ganga pointed out that item one of the Rules of Engagement did not catch some of the
pedestrian projects. There might be cases where improvements were needed, such as at
Bollinger Road or Stelling Road, where there was a pedestrian fatality. Improvements at those
intersections needed to be reviewed by the Commission. Mr. Stillman suggested that, instead of
identifying the projects to be be reviewed, have the Rules of Engagement say, “all pedestrian
projects, excluding marked crosswalks at intersections.” Anything else was something the
Commission wanted to be involved in.
Chair Ganga pointed out there was a Pedestrian Master Plan, which the City was
implementing. Items related to the Pedestrian Master Plan came to the Commission for review.
Minor improvements did not need to come before the Commission, which could include
crosswalks, etcetera; there needed to be something that captured that. Mr. Stillman clarified that
a crosswalk was not a major improvement, it was a local safety enhancement. Vice Chair Carter
interjected that was not true and cited the example of the intersection between McClellan and
De Anza, where crosswalks were part of the presentation. He added that the Bollinger Road
project included crosswalks as part of the presentation. Mr. Stillman replied that it was part of a
larger plan. Those projects cited were part of a larger plan, and the crosswalks were a
component of that.
Liana Crabtree, public speaker commented that transit stops were not well situated to consider
pedestrian needs. She cited the example of a transit stop in front of Trader Joes. She wanted the
area around them ADA compliant.
Chair Ganga suggested splitting item one into two items, one being bicycle and the other
pedestrian, so there were the right attributes for the pedestrian projects that would fall within
the right criteria. He wanted to add “major improvements” to pedestrian projects and proximity
to transit stops. Mr. Stillman suggested adding “at‐grade improvements to existing legal
crossings” as an exemption to pedestrian projects. This excluded simple crosswalks and ADA
8
Page 4 of 7
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting
May 18, 2022
ramps at corners. There was also the possibility of mentioning bus stops, to capture the public
comment. Vice Chair Carter noted that it was not just bus stops, there was a need to be more
specific, such as large areas where people congregate at a church. Chair Ganga responded that
what Mr. Stillman suggested would include bus stops. Mr. Stillman said his suggestion would
include that because it did not have anything to do with a street crossing.
MOTION: Vice Chair Carter moved, seconded by Commissioner Eschelbeck to adopt the
following Rules of Engagement for the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission project review:
1. Bicycle projects which involve a permanent change to vertical elements within the street
between existing curbs
2. Pedestrian projects other than at‐grade improvements to existing legal crossings
3. Projects with community outreach
4. Bicycle or pedestrian projects which are heard as a Council discussion item, except items
requested by Council to be heard directly
5. Staff recommendations for active traffic control devices (such as stop signs, traffic
signals, crossing guards)
6. Council requests for Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission recommendations
7. Major development projects, on‐site and off‐site (if more detailed, or if it differs from the
Bike Plan)
8. All items falling within the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission’s Mission Statement, per the
Municipal Code
MOTION PASSED: 5‐0
4. Bubb Road and Kennedy Middle School Separated Bike Lane (Stillman)
Birgit Werner, Community Coordinator gave a presentation on the Bubb Road and Kennedy
Middle School Separated Bike Lane proposal.
Vice Chair Carter said this was his neighborhood and he wanted to emphasize the bollards,
they were safer and made things more visible.
Commissioner Lindskog asked if there was any risk that a car door would open into the
separated bike lane; there needed to be enough of a separation. Another question was where the
cars turned into the school and crossed the bike lane. He wondered if it was possible to make it
clearer for vehicles crossing a bike lane. Ms. Werner said there was already a separation
installed between the cars and the bike lane. Parents, for the most part, did not let their children
out on the street. Commissioner Lindskog clarified that cars were turning right into the school
and could cut off a cyclist. He suggested having the bike lane raised, so vehicles went over a
bump, indicating they need to slow down. Mr. Stillman replied that usually there would be
additional striping installed across the driveway, to highlight to cars that there was a driveway.
They could consider signage, such as “yield to bike,” to make cars more aware.
9
Page 5 of 7
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting
May 18, 2022
Chair Ganga wondered if there was signage directing motorists to go around a loop. Ms.
Werner showed a picture of a sign that was used in the pilot, asking people to use the Pumpkin
Loop if the lot was full. Parents were notified of this by flyer and e‐bulletins, so they had
advance notice. Additionally, the Police patrolled, and by the end of the two weeks, the parents
followed the direction on the sign. Chair Ganga reiterated that permanent signage was needed.
Ms. Werner suggested addressing this inquiry through the school as well, as there were pick‐up
and drop‐off maps that were provided to the parents. She added that the problem was at the
beginning when people had to learn the behavior, but as soon as it was learned, there were no
problems. Chair Ganga understood that there was an expectation for parents to learn the
behavior, but signage was still needed because the parent might not read the flyer.
Chair Ganga pointed out that this was not a Class 4 bike lane, it was more of a separated bike
lane that was getting improvements. Mr. Stillman responded that it was possible to have a Class
2 on one side of the street and a Class 4 on the other side of the street. The suggestion met the
definition of a Class 4 if permanent posts were installed.
Liz, public speaker commented that many of her peers do not bike to school because many cars
drove in the bike lane. She supported the Bubb Road separated bike lane because it was a safe
solution.
Commissioner Eschelbeck supported the recommendation.
Commissioner Lindskog and Chair Ganga supported the recommendation to proceed with the
separated bike lane. Chair Ganga reiterated the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission’s comments:
make sure the entry way is clearly marked, clear signage, and to make sure this project should
be prioritized like any other project.
MOTION: Commissioner Eschelbeck moved, seconded by Commissioner Lindskog to:
1. Make the separation of the bike path from temporary to permanent with bollards on the
west side of Bubb Road, between Hyannisport Drive and Rosario Avenue; and
2. Direct staff to evaluate measures to increase the awareness of bicyclists to drivers
turning right into the Kennedy Middle School parking lot and implement measures as
appropriate.
MOTION PASSED: 5‐0
5. Junipero Serra Trail/I‐280 Trail Naming (Stillman)
David Stillman, Transportation Manager did not have a presentation for this item but explained
how some Council members and members of the public have requested that staff consider a
different name for the Junipero Serra Trail/I‐280 Trail. He wanted the Bicycle Pedestrian
Commission (Commission) to discuss a new name for this trail.
10
Page 6 of 7
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting
May 18, 2022
Liana Crabtree, public speaker suggested the new name honor the native people, the tribe that
inhabited the area before Junipero Serra came along. She wanted someone to reach out to that
tribe and ask them if they had ideas for the new name of the trail.
Chair Ganga wanted to know if there were opportunities for the public to provide their input.
Mr. Stillman said that could be a recommendation. This was the first real opportunity for public
input. The Commission was able to recommend that the naming be a larger public outreach
effort, beyond the confines of the Commission.
Vice Chair Carter commented that, before suggesting an indigenous name, someone contact the
indigenous people to make sure they were okay with it. He did not want to unintentionally
suggest a name that was crude or did not make sense; the name needed to be vetted.
Commissioner Eschelbeck liked the idea of a naming scheme, like Northern Loop. That
assumed there was a Southern Loop. He wondered if that recommendation should be adopted.
Mr. Stillman thought that was a good idea and added that it was good to look at the network of
trails, choosing something that worked for all the pieces, rather than looking at each trail in
isolation. He suggested bringing bring back a naming scheme to the Commission. Chair Ganga
thought a name needed to be vetted by the legal team. He said suggestions could be made by
the public, or when the Commissioners come to the next meeting, they could come with a list of
suggested names. He wanted Commissioners to come to the commission and have a list of
names, that will make the process easier. There needed to be prescreened names and a criterion
used. Mr. Stillman asked if he was referring to the names being prescreened by the City
Attorney’s Office. Chair Ganga said yes. Mr. Stillman said there needed to be some kind of
outreach process where there was wider input from the community.
Commission Lindskog liked the idea of using local tribal names. Commissioner John thought
checking with indigenous people first was a good idea.
Chair Ganga wanted outreach and then have it come back to the Commission. Mr. Stillman
asked for suggestions on the method of outreach. There was a suggestion of having a name
suggestion contest during the Bike Fest and having something broadcast on social media. Chair
Ganga wanted to follow the same method the Fine Arts Commission used when they renamed
their Commission. Vice Chair Carter pointed out that Safe Routes to School reached a lot of
interested people in the community; he liked the suggestion of having a contest during the Bike
Fest.
STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS
6. Staff Update and Commissioner Activity Report (All)
David Stillman, Transportation Manager relayed that the new crosswalk at Stelling Road and
Alves Drive was almost complete. Half of the pedestrian beacons were installed; the rest were
to be installed in a week or two. Regarding Vision Zero, it was looking like the Council was
going to approve it for next year’s Work Plan. This allowed staff to move forward with a
11
Page 7 of 7
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting
May 18, 2022
consultant and to be able to do a proper Vision Zero Program, which was built upon the work
of the Local Road Safety Plan. In other news, the Regnart Creek Trail won award by the
American Public Works Association for best project of the year. There was a luncheon and staff
accepted the award.
Commissioner Lindskog updated the Commission on the Valley Transportation Authority
(VTA) Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) meeting.
Chair Ganga discussed the Safe Routes to School (SR2S) meeting and the Mayor’s meeting.
Commissioner Lindskog was scheduled to attend the Mayor’s Meeting and the SR2S meeting in
June.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 9:23 p.m.
SUBMITTED BY:
____________________________
David Stillman, Staff Liaison
Note: Any attachments can be found on the Cupertino Website
https://www.cupertino.org/our‐city/agendas‐minutes
12
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
5/18/2022
Written Communication
Two recommended agenda items for 5/18 Bike Pedestrian Commission Meeting:
CARMEN BRIDGE
Background: In the September 30, 2019 Carmen Bridge Feasibility Study the cost
for the bridge was estimated at $1.25-1.95M [See page 3] for the three favorite
designs [See page 30]. The latest CIP excludes and funding for Carmen in the 22-
23 fiscal year and noted it as a project in years 2-4 for an amount of $5.25M. It is
incredulous that the cost of this pre-fabricated bridge could have increased 270-
420%.
Recommendation: With remaining Carmen funds from the 21-22CIP, hire the
consultants that did the feasibility study to update their cost estimate for options
1, 4 & 5 within the next 30 days AND use their answer in the 2-4 year CIP. The city
can always ask for a larger amount of grant money when the time comes, but the
shear increase to the $5.25M estimated cost assures that this bridge will continue
to be pushed to the bottom of competitive projects. A more realistic CIP figure is
required and could be obtained from the consultant for what is sure to be a small
cost.
Consultant was:
Mott MacDonald
2077 Gateway Place, Suite 550
San Jose CA 95110
Phone: 925 398 7274
Website: mottmac.com
REGNART CREEK TRAIL
Background: Regnart Creek Trail has been fully funded and built except for some
adjacent homeowner fencing which is currently under contract. The report by
David Stillman shows no completion date and therefore no projected trail
opening date.
Recommendation: Please provide the trail opening date and publish it to the
community who has waited years for this project to be undertaken and
completed. It could also be quite politic given the upcoming November elections.
13
Kennedy Middle School
Bubb Road
Separated Bikeway
May 18, 2022
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
May 18, 2022
Agenda Item #4
14
•Kennedy has 2 parking lots:
•Hyannisport Dr -
•Has a large enough
loop to hold most
cars, am and pm
•Bubb Rd -
•Drive through lot that
does not hold all
waiting cars at pick up
Kennedy Middle School
Pick up and Drop off
15
•Cars wait in Bubb Rd lot for afternoon pick up
•If lot is full, cars idle on Bubb Rd next to curb
•This is currently a green bike lane
•No parking signs are already posted
•Cars block the south bound bike lane
•Bike lane users: Monta Vista HS, Lincoln
ES, some commuting traffic
•More bikes expected next year due to
Regnart closing
Bubb Road Parking Lot
16
•Kennedy MS staff requested a separated bike lane
•From Hyannisport Dr to Pumpkin Dr
•This is the block in front of Kennedy MS
•Walk Audit Item:
•Bubb Rd from Hyannisport to Pumpkin:
Consider implementing Class IV bike lane along
school frontage after testing the concept with a pop-
up separated bike lane.
Separated Bikeway Request
17
April 4-15, 2022 –Pilot
Hyannisport Dr to Rosario Ave
18
April 4-15, 2022 –Pilot Feedback
•Feedback from community:
•“Amazing” –student on bike
•“I’m so glad they’re finally doing something. I’ve seen so many kids
almost get hit.” –lady walking
•“This is great. It’s about time.” –man walking
•“I think it’s a good thing. Traffic here is increasing”
•“I like it! So this will turn permanent like McClellan? I really like that. I
don’t feel safe biking down Bubb during the day.” –man on bike
•“Thank you for the cones. This is the best idea ever. I have been
dealing with this for 55 years. I was a student here too” –man from car
•Unanimous consensus from Kennedy SR2S Team
•Please make it permanent
19
April 4-15, 2022 –Pilot Observations
•The bike lane stayed clear at pick up!
•Noticeably more bike traffic at the end of the two weeks compared
to the beginning
•No appreciable difference to Hyannisport parking lot
•Estimated 10-20 more cars in Pumpkin –Cranberry –Holly Oaks
neighborhood
20
Recommendations
•City to make separation permanent with bollards
•City to study extending the separated bike lane from Hyannisport to
McClellan
•School to monitor parking lot to make sure cars pull forward
21
Thank You
22
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
22-11113 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
Agenda #: 2.
Subject: Future Agenda Items (Ganga)
Develop and Maintain a List of Future Agenda Items for the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 6/8/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™23
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
22-11114 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
Agenda #: 3.
Subject: Bicycle Boulevard Project, Phase 2 (Aumentado)
Receive Presentation on the Bicycle Boulevard Phase 2 Conceptual Design and Provide Direction to
Staff (Action Item)
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 6/8/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™24
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
22-11115 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
Agenda #: 4.
Subject:Regnart Creek Trail/Campo de Lozano Public Pedestrian Walkway Easement Vacation and
Rodrigues Avenue Midblock Pedestrian Crosswalk (Stillman)
Consider Recommendation:
1) Vacation of Public Pedestrian Walkway Easement through Campo de Lozano; and
2)Installation of Midblock Pedestrian Crosswalk Across Rodrigues Avenue between Torre Avenue
and Blaney Avenue (Action Item)
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 6/8/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™25
City of Cupertino Property Information
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,
Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Property Info Poly
Right of Way
City Boundary
2020 Aerial
Red: Band_1
Green: Band_2
Blue: Band_3
August 27, 2021
0 0.02 0.040.01 mi
0 0.03 0.060.01 km
1:1,128
The City of Cupertino does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or usefulness of any information. The City does not warrant the positional or thematic accuracy of the GIS data. The GIS data and cartographic digital files are not legal representations of the depicted data. Information shown on these layers
Attachment BAttachment A
26
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
22-11116 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
Agenda #: 5.
Subject: Staff Update and Commissioner Activity Report (All)
Receive Updates from Staff and Commissioners Regarding Recent Activities
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 6/8/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™27