Loading...
Presentations PRC Meeting 8/6/2020 Presentations Item # 1 Receive Email Phishing Campaign Presentation from Chief Technology Officer Mitchell PRC 8.6.20 Item #1 Commission 1 Cybersecurity July 9, 2020 CUPERTINO 49 • Cyber Threat Landscape • Ransomware • City's Cybersecurity Defense • Questions 2 1 Cyber Threat Landscape TH[FT• - --- ------�+ DATA VIRUS MALICIOUS SOFTWARE SOCIAL MEDIA A 5 t �.(j, / EYIERWARFARE' ■\uS • SOFT RE FAILURE DATA SP SM l NETWORK IFFtN'. HU A ERROR SECURITY SOFTWARE ERROR THREATS CYB ATTACKS QH CKI •G PASS ORDCRACKI /�►�. �IV FRIu1D Q fRCRIMINALS ADWAI�E f YS1EM P[NEIEETiON � CAPER ST.LN�w� � - Cyber Threat Landscape Ransomware 2020 Ransomware by Country Taiwan Norway New Zealand Hong Kong Rome Austria Croatia Portugal South Africa Singapore Switzerland France Oman Japan Denmark Germany Canada Australia United Kingdom United States 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Ransomware 2020 Ransomware by Industry 25 20 15 10 5 0 �°,a`� �. °�eee` L scar �a�tiec Q,ca Qa PRC 8.6.20 Item #1 Ransomware Successful Recent Attacks • Las Vegas, NV • Tillamook County, OR • Racine, WI • New Orleans, LA • North Miami Beach, FL • Torrance, CA • Knoxville, TN • UCSF — $1.14M Cybersecurity Defense IN 1�15 Co�?%R,Wtr NAVE � >;IWWALLS,IEWCgrKIoN, ANTIVIR05 SOFTWARE,ETC. AtAD IN T"6 CoN01 '� Vv1= NAB DA��1I now � `�• Q g 4 PRC 8.6.20 Item #1 Cybersecurity Defense Training & Notification • Mandatory for all employees • COVID-19 • Phishing Campaigns • Fail-Remedial Training • Caution Banner - Outside of Cupertino CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and knowthe content is safe. 9 Where we stand: See more phishmg reports Phishing Security Tests-Last 6 Months 189 Clicks 7 Replies 36 Anachmens Opcn 0 Macra Enabled 0 Oara Enrered 499 Reported Industry Benchmark Data Q 2% so ——————————————————————— YOUR LAST PHISH-PRONE% 3.8 % 2<% I I ' • 60 0 � INDUSTRY PHISH-PRONE% 3 % i I6% ' I 10 S Industry. Government 20 company Size Medium(250-1000 users q5 - Program Matumyl Baseline Clicks ✓♦Replies •Anach.—I Open 0 Macra Enabled Oasa Enrered Reported PH:h-Prone% Indusrry Avenge 10 5 City's Cybersecurity Defense ace 1011, Questions? Oe « .-.Eve r [Bpi P ochediv e mouth PRC Meeting 8/6/2020 Presentations Item #3 Update on the Coronavirus ' Impacts to Cupertino Parks and Recreation Programs PRC 8.6.20 Item #3 Coronavirus' Impacts on Parks and Recreation Programs Parks and Recreation Commission August 6, 2020 CUPERTINO 1 Overview: • Virtual Fitness Classes (free & paid) • In Person/Virtual Camps Golf Tennis Presentations/Social Groups/Workshops Shakespeare At Home <hack> Cupertino 2020 Planning for Fall Classes/Programs/Activities 2 1 PRC 8.6.20 Item #3 Participation: • Virtual Fitness Classes (July 27th—August 2nd) 343 • In Person Camps (August 3rd—7th) 110 of 142 • Virtual Camps (August 3rd—7th) 115 3 Participation: • Golf (July 27th—August 2nd) 1,110 Reservations • Tennis (July 27th—August 2nd) 638 Reservations • Presentations/Social Groups/Workshops Over 100 attendees 4 2 PRC 8.6.20 Item #3 HighlightsFREE SHAKESPEARE WINC . . Shakespeare At Home: King Lear Final Shows August 8t" at 7pm ooary q August 9t" at 4pm .- Free at youtube.com/user/SFShakes Place <hack> Cupertino 2020 WeCupertino July 18t"-July 25tn Apple Airpods .. .. ..... .. . . . . .. . .... .. ... .... . First virtual hackathon 120 participants, 43 submissions 5 3 PRC Meeting 8/6/2020 Presentations Item #4 Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District Survey Results and Options for Additional Community Outreach Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting August 6, 2020 CITY OF CUPERTINO PRC 8.6.20 Item #4 Background • Last year, LAFCO commissioned a report • Option 1 : Maintain RRRPD's current governance (status quo) • Option 2: Merger of RRRPD with the City of Cupertino 3 Survey Distribution • Letter was hand delivered to 1 ,295 RRRPD households • Rancho Rinconada project webpage • eNotifications 4 2 PRC 8.6.20 Item #4 Survey Responses 79 Individual Responses Some households had more than one respondent District Household Response Rate: 50 Households (3.9%) Non-District Household Responses: 17 Based upon your knowledge of District and the governance options presented in the special study,would you prefer to see Option 1 or Option 2? Option 1 -27 (34%) Option 2-51 (65%) 5 Master Plan - Aquatics 4.11 Consider adding new major facilities to meet community needs at existing 4.0 Expand swimming and waterplay opportunities. parks,through renovations to existing facilities,or at sites acquired in the i Continue m operate the elacwerry Farm pool complex as a place for future. ' Iseisure and swimming.if fea ble in the future,pursueexpanding the Prepare a business plan prior to developing new major facilities wmmm�g sea Pursue partnerships with otheren-thathaveswimmingpoolsNand to help identify the optimal size,amenities,location,programming,tees, Cupertino,a:pedauy f«,rsed on aernrmg nme for famuy swimming reven and operating model for facilities with high operating costs,such swim Iessons,lap swimming and aquatic exemse. as a performing arts center,an aquatic facility or a gymnasium/recreation ranter.Evaluate grouping similar uses(e.g.,maker space,art studio spas, "' Evaluate providing a new year-mood agnarics complex in the airy based on a business and opera'ores plan that recommends a design program. performing arts)for synergies and operating efficiencies. Cotuider a full range of aquatics programming to provide the most opportunity for users and increase revenue potential.PmAde programs n Evaluate options for joint-use partnerships and/or renovation of existing and tacilitles that focus-varied re fill opponurdties for families and - facilities(public,private or partner)prior to building new ones. for au ages and abilific, rrr Explore potential equity partners,operating partners and sponsors before w Provide more.—play features(splash pads/spray play areas/ planning and designing major facilities. inte did water featuma)for play in warm weather geographically dispersed in the city. iv Consider adding the following facilities in the future,if warranted and desired: - Year-round AquaNcs(see4Cbelow) T4- 6 3 PRC 8.6.20 Item #4 Master Plan - Aquatics ---- aquatics facility opportunities Pursue opportunities to partner with existing ,. y ..,.. w...�.....w. aquatics providers,including schools.If a new - city facility is desired,prepare a market analysis and business plan.If a new,aquatics facility is warranted and pursued,consider providing POTENTIAL ELEMENTS a year-round swimming facility designed for lap pool recreation and instructional swimming,aquatic —ter instructional pool exercise,lap swimming,and pool events. recreation pool hottub SITE SELECTION AND DISTRIBUTION - - - If pursed,develop one facility in an accessible - location,considering sites in central and east water ploy features Cupertino or opportunities to co-develop with Iffeguard/office,space another centralized City facility. locker rooms family changingroomsPOTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES outdoor sho�ers • Memorial Park areaslounge Cmekside Park spectator • ]ollyman Park birthday party rooms concessions • Wilson Park rental_- -_ Potential new site nearby parking • Public-private partnership 7 Next Steps • Additional Community Engagement • Send Another Survey • Include all Cupertino residents • Consider survey questions s 4 PRC Meeting 8/6/2020 Presentations Item #5 Update on the Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 Strategic Plan Guidance Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting August 6, 2020 0 CUPERTINO 1 Agenda • FY 2019/20 Funded Projects Carried to FY 2020/21 • FY 2020/21 Funded Projects Considerations for the Strategic Plan Evaluation for Strategic Plan Implementation Next Steps 2 1 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 FY 2019/20 Funded Projects Carried Over to FY 2020/21 Prol. I RENEW- Amount Description ■ All Inclusive Playground at Jollyman $5.53M Design and construct an all-inclusive playground at Park ($1.44M grant) Jollyman Park. On Hold Citywide Satellite Gardens $300,000 Identify sites and build additional community garden(s). Community Gardens at McClellan $1.2M Renovate the community gardens at McClellan Ranch Ranch,and implement a new process and procedures for a more effective,community-driven gardens program. Preschool Shade Structure $125,000 Design and construct a new shade structure over the existing play area and sand box at the preschool. Seismic Retrofit at Sports Center $1.275M Design and construct structural upgrades to the Sports Center for increased resiliency in the event of an earthquake. Lawrence/Mitty $8.27M Acquire a parcel at Lawrence Expressway near Milly (Purchase& Ave for trail expansion and park development. Development) Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan $610,000 Study the various uses of public lands along Stevens Creek for optimal public use and operation. 3 FY 2020/21 Funded Projects id K61 - • • Park Amenity Improvements $200,000 Annual Playground Replacement $300,000 BBF Golf Course Alternatives $50,000 Analysis 4 2 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 New Project Annual Playground Replacement �il 41' DESCRIPTION Replacement of older playground equipment -- that is dated and wom starting with Creekside(1998)and Varian(2002) Estimated Project Cost: 5300,000 annually Location: City-wide Funding:General Fund Requesting Dept.: Public Works PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The playground at several City playgrounds is over 18 years old with the equipment at Creekside park over 22 years old.The equipment is worn and dated.This project allows for the replacement of the equipment on an annual replacement schedule starting with the oldest to the newest. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACTS: The staff time is incvded in the operating budget. 5 Park Amenity Improvements DESCRIPTI N Funding for various park amenities-cf,as benches,hydration stations,outdoor table tennis,romhoh,shade(structures and/or // trees),dogof-least,pic leball striping,etc Estimated Project Cost SlAW,000(5-year tota) Location:City-wide $200,000 Annually Funding:General Fund Requesting Dept: Public Works PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This project provides a funding r-c anism to respond to dozen regncsts for minor park amenities in a cost effective and timely manner.Citizen suggestions for minor park improvements should be encouraged and supported.Approval of this project will allow the City to respond to such requests. OPERATING BUDGET ABACTS: A slight impact to the Operating Budget is anticipated in order to install these park improvements. 6 3 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 Strategic Plan Considerations I Description Recreation Elements and Identify and recommend potential Improved Comfort and Amenities sites for improved amenities such as benches,hydration stations, outdoor table tennis,cornhole, shade(structures and/or trees), pickleball striping,etc. Citywide Satellite Gardens Identify and recommend potential sites for satellite community gardens Prospective DOLA Locations Identify and recommend potential sites for Dog Off Leash Areas 7 Evaluation Form- _ Recreation Elements/ Garbage Hydration Benches/ Shade Outtloor Table Other(eg.Mile Markers, Pickleball Striping Cans/Rerycling Cornhole Improved Comfort and stations Bins Picnic Tables (trees/structured tennis InGusive Elements) Amenities Master Plan Rating 1-5 Rating 2-5 Rating 1-5 Rating 1-5 Rating 1-5 Rating 1-5 Rating 1-5 Item Rating 1-5 Memorial Park x Stevens Creek Corridor Park :a• ear... Creekside Park Hoover Park Jollyman Park Linda Vista Park Monte Vista Park&Rec renter x Portal Park Varian Park x Wilson Park .a• ear... Canyon Oak Park Franco Park Little Rancho Park Somerset Park Sterling Barnhart Park Three Oaks Park Civic Center Plaza Library Field Rams marked under master plan were recommended for that specific topic(reference Key for details on each taplc) Rating of 1-5 11=not recommended 5=highly remmmended) 8 4 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 Evaluation Form- DOLAs/Gardens DogPark(s)/DOLn(s) satellite Community Gardens Master Plan Rating 1-5 Master Plan Rating 1-5 • Memorial Park Stevens Creek Corridor Park x Creekside Park x x Hoover Park x x Jollyman Park x x Linda Vista Park x x Monta Vista Park&Rec Center x x Portal Park x x Varian Park x x Wilson Park x x Canyon Oak Park Franco Park Little Rancho Park Somerset Park x x Sterling Barnhart Park Three Oaks Park x x Civic Center Plaza Library Field Items marked undsr'Master Plan"were recommended tar thatspeclflc topic ireference Key tar detailson each topitl Rating of 1-5 11=not recommended 5=h1ghly recommendedl 9 Key-Opportunities - rmpwreeranrzrtaureraen p w_Ism II g rn pa y neee rmmo upeare ers(w'M ahlez/rM1airslapini rabies,or meer seaungy rg e�gsiar rm p wnM1r , .ally a.mag ovmarragiaaparg. .nAre..Ik...•id mxl.rk:wm. niviesw reAen parF ma umaim/phon g le NleN 1,annking alsM1B e .I�drmrg .. rvrcv� and.a rnmagnau<<n. tin/.m g revaae: n 1p2nn arg.l wa/or w ry par9 wayrne a1— erslry rssfoah alt ponluel eamna sp pp nu urnamem-men vp eeaa venue iv: rm o nal mexgsarg .rnnrysu p �rplpvoi ameor vencein rya crn nro� r a.an rnwaaml nn u.m.pl.a. m neee nr wwamparxrrmesa aervnies wr senors ane aeul¢ eon p.nl.]Ipoubl mg cola, w w.+ry Pe .a.m.aa a.rre 1br.�gaag.. .agar po<.mi.l.nes and a.e..m�a. marax-yea: eiawa rn„n.raane.am�rrry a+N=rv��i.moose ge ee nmp�m ga m,�namee�a g, mnea.wnn rn rgapiry an munnycareem nie.kr - si Wag,k 1—diywnaeu fors a su a e � impememawn. mgarawmar�r n an aaeaamleplam�ng are,: �ree,n��aaenna�amarea nr W�md an p p r a�w mgn.. n a�etlaan na erewrl�ns a ra ampw�uemr. w qam ee�a oremgerows g� � erouslrcawru si rsmaller. 6 iMoo-sr 6 ns armme unlN 6areense lam iuonal rommuarry gar nzaao gy 10 5 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 =27-111=11.1,=d I,I,I,1 7 een ors fezhrn•rmreamnmm Pay'PP umnn. "n, ........................ aced P11W.1h. I p I—­ 5 z= Mire planxed ne play I�d­ adhmma zl­ merry 1. =1.I1­..­­­­I1­­ law =e .pap—.— p- .1d he l­tsaz.softball area Z­ Th'.'M I .1 P—Il,' ass—il ll-d Web rap I—- leas Key Perk Dl­rIpl Guyon Oak Park Playnode for Meal use. N.,—IV pI­.d,NV­N­ rtgalnraM odenutlonmtMvreap of open space.S­ leanly MM'll, . sNad..M smallgroup pll,&.1l and bcYd. ­from r.— [oun,evaluate poufile on­0 w1lbl,II;Ill,ld Mv—for 1­1 Sommer Park HIll park ­IAIV pI­.d­p­­bees arrd pI.N1k% duualn Ill leanly lox"­.d�j re receMty added IN 11191 the 5-11,ka.h­Fah M,—Wth­W­W � ,` ' --I.a (2010) 1d along IN, INA 11­1 1"�­Il, I a�._Vim=WmAdm property. IN'.Oa.part Wlffi­PA wth N­ Ho suneMlY pI­.d'W­Atltlltlonal benches play area-IA 11" emphasis. —1y'l-Alk a. Mlull A f,(PI ll=b.,FkI "I"P­­1­1 5­1111 IAI�1,9,plld 19 1—�.Ihg d.l on ­ ..d I—) ­d­Nd gfl 1 11 ­­I1I­1d,.ckf4d wll,l,..d.n.Adj.­ Nd—pIng."'y g C­.,. P...parcel for 1A ll�M.7 Pot t1ff retlunaon.1d to IhIl— uhrary FIl and rexoning 11 as ft dFIXIII Plall!JngI.The 1­11dve fllltlll was emn mar. 12 6 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 -- _ ❑ Perks& Recreation I Fcu oDepartment MaP of E R.Parks,.Pan Sp— andd R¢cr¢oXon Reso.— urc¢s .c I , I r 9 a i �W x _ - �,oiNm.a a ww raw:„ u u ias.�rw vwl�" e rasa a 9.. 6 c.,ron o.k a.,E 9 r�nea wu uro.i.i a.,k ]s samrur 10 R.mwkt Puk 13 Next Steps 0 Evaluate east side parks ] Evaluate oldest parks ❑ Evaluate all parks ❑ Evaluate in batches or all at once ❑ Have sub-groups to evaluate a batch of parks 14 7