The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda Packet CITY OF CUPERTINO AGENDA lop C U P E RTI N O PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION This will be a Teleconference Meeting with no Physical Location Thursday, August 6, 2020 7:00 PM This Meeting Will Be Televised TELECONFERENCE/PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION TO HELP STOP THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 In accordance with Governor Newsom's Executive Order No-29-20, this will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location to help stop the spread of COVID-19. Members of the public wishing to observe the meeting may do so in one of the following ways: 1) Tune to Comcast Channel 26 and AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 on your TV. 2) The meeting will also be streamed live on and online at www.Cupertino.org/youtube and www.Cupertino.org/webcast Members of the public wishing comment on an item on the agenda may do so in the following ways: 1) E-mail comments by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 6 to the Commission at parkscommissionecupertino.org. These e-mail comments will be received by the commission members before the meeting and posted to the City's website after the meeting. 2) E-mail comments during the times for public comment during the meeting to the Commission at parkscommission@cupertino.org. The staff liaison will read the emails into the record, and display any attachments on the screen, for up to 3 minutes (subject to the Chair's discretion to shorten time for public comments). Members of the public that wish to share a document must email parkscommission@cupertino.org prior to speaking. 3) Teleconferencing Instructions Members of the public may observe the teleconference meeting or provide oral public comments as follows: Oral public comments will be accepted during the teleconference meeting. Comments may Page 1 Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda August 6,2020 be made during "oral communications" for matters not on the agenda, and during the public comment period for each agenda item. To address the Commission, click on the link below to register in advance and access the meeting: Online Please click the link below to join the webinar: https:Hcityofcupertino.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_6TOrECFvQju7mfhGNPtU1w Phone Dial 888 788 0099, enter Webinar ID: 916 9742 9870 (Type *9 to raise hand to speak) Unregistered participants will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number. Or an H.323/SIP room system: H.323: 162.255.37.11 (US West) 162.255.36.11 (US East) 213.19.144.110 (EMEA) 103.122.166.55 (Australia) 69.174.57.160 (Canada) Meeting ID: 916 9742 9870 SIP: 91697429870@zoomcrc.com After registering,you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. Please read the following instructions carefully: 1. You can directly download the teleconference software or connect to the meeting in your internet browser. If you are using your browser, make sure you are using a current and up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers, including Internet Explorer. 2. You will be asked to enter an email address and a name, followed by an email with instructions on how to connect to the meeting. Your email address will not be disclosed to the public. If you wish to make an oral public comment but do not wish to provide your name,you may enter "Cupertino Resident" or similar designation. 3. When the Chair calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on "raise hand." Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. Page 2 Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda August 6,2020 4. When called, please limit your remarks to the time allotted and the specific agenda topic. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this teleconference meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request,in advance,by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS 1. Subject: Receive Email Phishing Campaign Presentation from Chief Technology Officer Mitchell. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2. Subject: Meeting of July 2, 2020. Draft Minutes POSTPONEMENTS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission and not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect to a matter not on the agenda. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS OLD BUSINESS 3. Subject: Update on the Coronavirus' Impacts to Cupertino Parks and Recreation Programs. Staff Report 4. Subject: Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District Survey Results and Options for Additional Community Outreach. Staff Report Attachment A-Rancho Rinconda Survey Overview Page 3 Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda August 6,2020 5. Subject: Update on the Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan. Staff Report Attachment A-Key Opportunities Matrix Attachment B-Park Description Matrix Attachment C-Park and Facility NEW BUSINESS STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS 6. Subject: Receive Monthly Update Reports from: -Director - Commissioners COMMISSIONER ATTENDANCE AT FUTURE MEETINGS AND EVENTS ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this teleconference meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members after publication of the agenda will be made available for public inspection. Please contact the City Clerk's Office in City Hall located at 10300 Torre Avenue during normal business hours. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City's website and kept in packet archives. You are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights you may have on the information provided to the City. Members of the public are entitled to address the members concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the members on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment. Page 4 CITY OF CUPERTINO CUPERTINO Legislation Text File#: 20-7831, Version: 1 Subject: Receive Email Phishing Campaign Presentation from Chief Technology Officer Mitchell. CITY OF CUPERTINO Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/6/2020 powered by LegistarTM PRC 8.6.20 Item #1 Commission 1 Cybersecurity July 9, 2020 CUPERTINO 49 • Cyber Threat Landscape • Ransomware • City's Cybersecurity Defense • Questions 2 1 Cyber Threat Landscape TH[FT• - --- ------�+ DATA VIRUS MALICIOUS SOFTWARE SOCIAL MEDIA A 5 t �.(j, / EYIERWARFARE' ■\uS • SOFT RE FAILURE DATA SP SM l NETWORK IFFtN'. HU A ERROR SECURITY SOFTWARE ERROR THREATS CYB ATTACKS QH CKI •G PASS ORDCRACKI /�►�. �IV FRIu1D Q fRCRIMINALS ADWAI�E f YS1EM P[NEIEETiON � CAPER ST.LN�w� � - Cyber Threat Landscape Ransomware 2020 Ransomware by Country Taiwan Norway New Zealand Hong Kong Rome Austria Croatia Portugal South Africa Singapore Switzerland France Oman Japan Denmark Germany Canada Australia United Kingdom United States 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Ransomware 2020 Ransomware by Industry 25 20 15 10 5 0 �°,a`� �. °�eee` L scar �a�tiec Q,ca Qa PRC 8.6.20 Item #1 Ransomware Successful Recent Attacks • Las Vegas, NV • Tillamook County, OR • Racine, WI • New Orleans, LA • North Miami Beach, FL • Torrance, CA • Knoxville, TN • UCSF — $1.14M Cybersecurity Defense IN 1�15 Co�?%R,Wtr NAVE � >;IWWALLS,IEWCgrKIoN, ANTIVIR05 SOFTWARE,ETC. AtAD IN T"6 CoN01 '� Vv1= NAB DA��1I now � `�• Q g 4 PRC 8.6.20 Item #1 Cybersecurity Defense Training & Notification • Mandatory for all employees • COVID-19 • Phishing Campaigns • Fail-Remedial Training • Caution Banner - Outside of Cupertino CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and knowthe content is safe. 9 Where we stand: See more phishmg reports Phishing Security Tests-Last 6 Months 189 Clicks 7 Replies 36 Anachmens Opcn 0 Macra Enabled 0 Oara Enrered 499 Reported Industry Benchmark Data Q 2% so ——————————————————————— YOUR LAST PHISH-PRONE% 3.8 % 2<% I I ' • 60 0 � INDUSTRY PHISH-PRONE% 3 % i I6% ' I 10 S Industry. Government 20 company Size Medium(250-1000 users q5 - Program Matumyl Baseline Clicks ✓♦Replies •Anach.—I Open 0 Macra Enabled Oasa Enrered Reported PH:h-Prone% Indusrry Avenge 10 5 City's Cybersecurity Defense ace 1011, Questions? Oe « .-.Eve r [Bpi P ochediv e mouth CITY OF CUPERTINO CUPERTINO Legislation Text File#: 20-8041, Version: 1 Subject: Meeting of July 2, 2020. CITY OF CUPERTINO Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/6/2020 powered by LegistarTM CITY OF CITY OF CUPERTINO is PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Community Hall CUPERTINO Teleconference Meeting Thursday, July 2, 2020 7:00 PM DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Kumarappan called the meeting to order at 7:05p.m. via teleconference. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Commissioners present: Gopal Kumarappan, Carol Stanek, Neesha Tambe, Xiangchen Xu, Sashikala Begur Commissioners absent: None Staff present: Joanne Magrini, Christine Hanel, Whitney Zeller Guest speakers: None CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS None APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting of Tune 4, 2020. Commissioner Tambe asked for clarification on what information is captured in the context and requested to amend the minutes to reflect that Commissioner Tambe voted no,based on the tiered system. Commissioner Tambe motioned to approve the minutes with the amendment of the discussion and rationale behind the tiering system of the funding to Item 3. Chair Kumarappan seconded the motion. Vice Chair Stanek asked for clarification on the amendment to the minutes. Commissioner Tambe amended specified the amendment should reflect one No vote from Commissioner Tambe on the basis of a tiered system. Motion passed with 5 votes yes. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None POSTPONEMENTS 2. Satellite Community Garden Project. Joanne Magrini provided an update on the item which has been on hold due to COVID-19. Commissioner Tambe recommended looking at non-traditional spaces for potential satellite garden sites. OLD BUSINESS 3. Update on the Coronavirus' Impacts to Parks and Recreation Programs. Joanne Magrini provided an update on the Coronavirus' impacts to Cupertino's Parks and Recreation Programs, including new guidance for the use of face coverings, no aquatics programming this summer, camps being offered, updated virtual recreation website, private lessons offered (golf, tennis personal training), electric carts available at the golf course, park bathrooms opening, and the #CupertinoCares initiative. Commissioner Tambe requested information on registration numbers vs capacities for camps and the unique number of participants at the golf course. 4. Provide Recommendation to City_ Council Regarding the Dog Off Leash Area Trial at Tollyman Park. Joanne Magrini reviewed the staff report for the item and asked the Commission to provide a recommendation to City Council on the Jollyman DOLA as well as the hours if extended. Community member Ankita Goyal spoke in favor of the DOLA and spoke in favor of changing the hours to 1 hour before sunset and 1 hour after sunset. Community member Sameer Raheja spoke in favor of the DOLA and supported the proposal to change the hours to 1 hour before sunset and 1 hour after sunset. Community member Deepa Mahendraker spoke in favor of the DOLA and supported the proposal to change the hours to 1 hour before sunset and 1 hour after sunset. Community member Madhu Krishnan spoke in favor of the DOLA and supported the proposal to change the hours to 1 hour before sunset and 1 hour after sunset. Community member Raj Avasarala and his children spoke in favor of the DOLA. Community member Manjaya Hegde spoke in favor of the DOLA. Community member Debashis Patnala spoke in favor of the DOLA and supported the proposal to change the hours to 1 hour before sunset and 1 hour after sunset. Commissioners asked clarifying questions Vice Chair Stanek spoke in favor of changing the hours to one hour before and one hour after sunset. Commissioner Tambe spoke in favor of changing the hours to one hour before and one hour after sunset, so long as staff are able to accommodate the adjusted hours and recommended continuing to identify potential DOLA locations while the trial continues. Commissioner Tambe motioned to approve the extension of the DOLA trial to June 30, 2021. Chair Kumarappan seconded the motion. Commissioner Begur added an amendment to the motion to include "or until 2 months of coexistence with youth sports, whichever comes first". Amended motion passed with 5 votes yes. Vice Chair Stanek motioned to change the DOLA hours to 1 hour before and 1 hour after sunset all year long. Commissioner Tambe seconded the motion. Motion passed with 5 votes yes. 5. Parks and Recreation Commission FY 2020/21 Work Program. Joanne Magrini reviewed the staff report and asked the Commission to provide a recommendation to City Council. Commissioners asked clarifying questions. Joanne Magrini suggested to change the wording of the DOLA item project objective to read "To identify additional areas suitable for permitting dogs to be off leash and establish other areas, if the current trial period is successful" and change the item's performance goals to read "..and establish other DOLAS". Commissioner Tambe recommended re-adding the original recommended State of the Trails item to align with the City Work Program's transportation item 6, which references traffic mitigation and adding the marketing research and implementation item. Commissioner Tambe motioned to approve the Parks and Recreation FY 2020/21 Work Program with the following items: Blackberry Farm Golf Course Dogs Off Leash Areas (DOLA) Rancho Rinconada (RR) Parks and Recreation Department Strategic Plan Use of Athletic Fields in Parks Community Garden Improvements State of the Trails And DOLA item project objective to read "To identify additional areas suitable for permitting dogs to be off leash and establish other areas, if the current trial period is successful". Chair Kumarappan seconded the motion. Motion passed with 5 votes yes. NEW BUSINESS STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS 6. Receive Monthly Update Reports from: Director - No items to report Commissioners - Commissioner Tambe provided an update on the Strategic Plan subcommittee - Vice Chair Stanek provided an update on City Council's decision on Community Funding Grant Program - Commissioner Xu provided an update from the Rancho Rinconada subcommittee COMMISSIONER ATTENDANCE AT UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS Commissioner Xu will attend the July 151h Mayor's meeting. ADJOURNMENT-Chair Kumarappan adjourned the meeting at 9:56p.m. to the August 6, 2020 meeting at 7 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Whitney Zeller, Administrative Assistant Parks &Recreation Department Minutes approved at the regular meeting Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting 8/6/20 Written Communications Item #4 Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District Survey Results and Options for Additional Community Outreach From: Jennifer Griffin To: City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission Cc: Subject: Concerns About Rancho Rinconada Survey Date: Thursday,August 6,2020 12:57:07 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Park and Recreation Commission: I have read the information about the Rancho Rinconada survey which I participated in last spring. I have some concerns about the surbey. It appears that there were 11 responses from one household. Was this house actually in Rancho Rinconada? Can this be verified? How can you have 11 responses from one household? Was the survey designed to have one response from each household or as many as 11 people in a household? That is a lot of people in one household. I would be wondering who lived in that house? How does the survey make sure only Rancho Rinconada residents respond? I think that there should be another survey that is just for Rancho Rinconada residenys. I don't think Next Door should be involved in the survey. Not every one is on Next Door and Next Door has a lot of problems. It is not secure. I do think the survey should be redesigned if they are going to use it again. When I was taking it I did not feel it was secure and I was afraid our comments would be shown to people who should not see them. I do not think the survey was secure enough and confidential. Please redo the survey if that is what you are going to do and only let Rancho Rinconada resdents participate. It is our one million dollars assets that are in the pool facility and the land and no one outside of Rancho Rinconada can comment on or have the authority to say how that how that money is to be retained on-site at the facility or is addressed in any other way. Rancho Rinconada is in the Special District and no one else. Others should not be deciding what to do with the one million dollars assets and it is not theirs to"give"to the city. Please redo the survey and make it secure and more confidential and only for Rancho Rinconada residents . And also do not let 11 people from one household weigh the responses. My husband has a Masters in Statistics and he said this was not a random sampling and the data responses are skewed. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Jennifer Griffin From: sandra yeaton To: City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission Subject: Fw: rancho Please distribute this to all commisioners and director magrini Date: Tuesday,August 4,2020 10:14:27 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. From: Sandra yeaton Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 9:24 PM To: Carol Stanek<cstanek@cupertino.org> Subject: Re: rancho thank you carol. I think some of the comments were concerns about taxes. We pay the same property tax regardless . 4.61 percent of it now goes to the special district. I'm not aware of Barrington Bridge ever being concerned before. Their comments seem a little contrived. Based on my knowledge and experience of nearly 30 years on that board, I can say the city with experienced people in Parks and Recreation are infinitely more capable and honest in their ability to create something really good for all the community opposed to people with no experience (at least for the past 7 years) who have no interest other than that of the 1/2 million dollar tax that comes in there every year and the little system they have set up spend it. Not on programs. i will watch the meeting on tv. I can only hope this comes out well for the community. I went to LAFCO because this District is not operating for the people. It would be a travesty if it were allowed to continue. sandra yeaton From: Carol Stanek<cstanek@cupertino.org> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 8:08 PM To: Sandra yeaton Subject: Re: rancho Hi Sandra, Rancho Rinconada is on the Parks and Rec Commission agenda for Thursday. I've attached the agenda if you'd like to review the item. Wishing you well, Carol Stanek CITY OF CUPERTINO CUPERTINO Legislation Text File M 20-8042, Version: 1 Subject: Update on the Coronavirus' Impacts to Cupertino Parks and Recreation Programs. CITY OF CUPERTINO Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/6/2020 powered by LegistarTM CITY OF PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT QUINLAN COMMUNITY CENTER 10185 NORTH STELLING ROAD • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-5732 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3120 • FAX: (408) 777-1305 CUPERTINO CUPERTINO.ORG STAFF REPORT For the Parks &Recreation Commission Meeting on August 6, 2020 Subject Update on the Coronavirus' Impacts to Cupertino Parks and Recreation Programs. Recommended Actions Receive an update from staff regarding the impacts of the Coronavirus on the Parks and Recreation programs. Discussion Since March 2020, when the impacts of the coronavirus were felt in Santa Clara County, the City of Cupertino has taken multiple actions for the public's health and safety. All facilities,recreation programs,rentals and special events were initially closed or cancelled, and staff then handled the administrative tasks while working from home. The Parks Rangers continued to monitor the trail, and a few employees tended to the animals at McClellan Ranch. The Parks and Recreation Department has continued to monitor updates to the County's Shelter in Place Order and adapt as needed. At the August 6th Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, we will provide the most up-to-date information on the Coronavirus' impacts to the Parks and Recreation Department's programs. Sustainability Impact No sustainability impact is associated with the receipt of this report. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with the receipt of this report. Prepared by: Whitney Zeller,Administrative Assistant Reviewed by:Joanne Magrini,Director of Parks and Recreation Approved by:Joanne Magrini,Director of Parks and Recreation Attachments: None PRC 8.6.20 Item #3 Coronavirus' Impacts on Parks and Recreation Programs Parks and Recreation Commission August 6, 2020 CUPERTINO 1 Overview: • Virtual Fitness Classes (free & paid) • In Person/Virtual Camps Golf Tennis Presentations/Social Groups/Workshops Shakespeare At Home <hack> Cupertino 2020 Planning for Fall Classes/Programs/Activities 2 1 PRC 8.6.20 Item #3 Participation: • Virtual Fitness Classes (July 27th—August 2nd) 343 • In Person Camps (August 3rd—7th) 110 of 142 • Virtual Camps (August 3rd—7th) 115 3 Participation: • Golf (July 27th—August 2nd) 1,110 Reservations • Tennis (July 27th—August 2nd) 638 Reservations • Presentations/Social Groups/Workshops Over 100 attendees 4 2 PRC 8.6.20 Item #3 HighlightsFREE SHAKESPEARE WINC . . Shakespeare At Home: King Lear Final Shows August 8t" at 7pm ooary q August 9t" at 4pm .- Free at youtube.com/user/SFShakes Place <hack> Cupertino 2020 WeCupertino July 18t"-July 25tn Apple Airpods .. .. ..... .. . . . . .. . .... .. ... .... . First virtual hackathon 120 participants, 43 submissions 5 3 CITY OF CUPERTINO CUPERTINO Legislation Text File M 20-8043, Version: 1 Subject: Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District Survey Results and Options for Additional Community Outreach. CITY OF CUPERTINO Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/6/2020 powered by LegistarTM CITY OF PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT QUINLAN COMMUNITY CENTER 10185 NORTH STELLING ROAD • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-5732 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3120 • FAX: (408) 777-1305 CUPERTINO CUPERTINO.ORG PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting August 6,2020 Subject Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District Survey Results and Options for Additional Community Outreach. Recommended Action Review results from the Rancho Rinconada survey administered in March (2020) and discuss options for additional community outreach. Discussion The Parks and Recreation Department distributed a survey to the 1,295 Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District(RRRPD)households in March of 2020. The survey was available from March 7111—23rd and had a response rate of 3.9% (50 households). The Rancho Rinconada subcommittee was provided an overview of the survey,which includes how the survey was distributed, response rates, survey questions and survey results (Attachment A). After reviewing the survey results, the subcommittee recommended to facilitate additional community outreach to provide the Commission with a better understanding of the community's response to the topic. Staff are asking the Commission to recommend how to proceed with community outreach. The March survey can be redistributed to gather additional responses, or the Commission can recommend changes to the survey before opening it to the public. Staff recommends that the redistributed survey be open to all residents rather than RRRPD residents exclusively, as all residents will be impacted by any decisions made. Sustainability Impact No sustainability impact. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impact. Prepared by: Whitney Zeller,Administrative Assistant Reviewed bv:Joanne Magrini, Director of Parks and Recreation Approved for Submission by:Joanne Magrini, Director of Parks and Recreation Attachments: A-Rancho Rinconada Survey Overview Survey Questions:Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District Call to Action:Let us know what you want for the future of Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District Survey Introduction:Last year,the Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission(LAFCO) commissioned a report—at the request of a few Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District(District) residents—to consider the District being dissolved and absorbed by the City of Cupertino(City).If the City were to absorb the District,this action would not impact property taxes on Cupertino homes within the District.More information can be found at cupertino.org/ranchorinconada. The main distribution and outreach method to let the Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District (RRRPD)residents know about the survey was hand delivering a letter to all 1,295 households within the RRRPD.This was done to keep the outreach to only RRRPD residents as best we could. Alternatively,we created a webpage(http://cupertino.org/ranchorinconada)dedicated to the RRRPD project and an eNotification group with six subscribers.eNotification were sent to this group about the opening and closing dates of the survey(March 7h—23rd).Survey respondents who opted into the eNotification group have not yet been added. District Household Response Rate(1,295 Households in the District):50 District Households(3.9%) Responses from the Same Household-11 1. Name (First and Last) Information Redacted—79 Respondents 2. Address (Example: 10300 Torre Ave) Information Redacted 3. Is your household located within the Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District(District) limits? • Yes—65 (82%) • No—10 (13%) • Not Sure—4(5%) Verified Response to Question 3: • Yes—61 (77%) • No—17(22%) • NA—1 (1%) 4. Where you aware of the Rancho Rinconada District's existence as a Special District within Santa Clara County? • Yes—52 (66%) • No—26 (33%) • NA—1 (1%) 5. Do you currently use the Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District facilities and services? • Yes—38 (48%) • No—39 (49%) • NA—2 (3%) 6. If you use the Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District,when do you typically use it? (select all that apply) • Year-Round—24(30%) • Winter-0 • Spring-0 • Summer—22(28%) • Fall-0 7. How often did you use District's facilities within the past year? • Regularly—22(28%) • Occasionally—11 (14%) • Rarely—15(19%) • Never—27(34%) • NA—4(5%) 8. If you use the Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District, what types of activities do you participate in? (select all that apply) • Swim Lessons—19(24%) • Pre-competitive Swim Training-3(4%) • Youth Swim Team—8(10%) • Public Swim—33(42%) • Summer Camps—7(9%) • Facility Rentals—19(24%) • Other: o Barrington Bridge Community Board Meetings o Morning Lap Swim-2 o Meetings and social o Voting Location-3 o Basketball Court o Aqua Exercise(discontinued) o Yoga Class 9. If do not use the Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District,what types of activities would you be interested in participating in? (select all that apply) • Swim Lessons—15(19%) • Pre-competitive Swim Training—9(11%) • Youth Swim Team—6(8%) • Public Swim—32(41%) • Summer Camps—10(13%) • Event Rentals—26(33%) • Other: o Senior Programs-3 o Community Meeting Place o Classes-2 o Community Events o Teen Programs The Cupertino City Council is asking the Parks &Recreation Commission to consider the two options below as described in the special study. 10. Option 1:Maintain RRRPD's Current Governance (Status Quo) —RRRPD remains intact as an independent recreation and park district, and continues to be governed by an independent Board of Directors. Do you have any concerns about Option 1? Conflict of interest, lack of transparency and accountability No concerns. I think the district is fine as it is. Having a separate RRRPD board is a waste of resources and funds; maintenance of the property seems to have fallen off No,we like this idea Yes, Next Door had a lot of info about misappropriated funds... Having reliable board members, non-biased and actually spend time getting to know the facility. My concern is that the size of the special district, in terms of personnel needed to operate and govern and use of funds, is inefficient versus the benefits of merging into the bigger Cupertino organization. Yes-the employees (lifeguards) said they were not being paid regularly. We wanted to rent the facility space for a birthday last year and were unable to due to poor management. No. I prefer this option. I see no reason why this special district exists and why it should not be absorbed. It is open to people outside our district; it also is not terribly economical; its finances do not have great transparency and seem too expensive; the board members aren't especially great governors; management of the pool is not very experienced;the swim lessons program contract seems to be run by friends or family members, increasing issues regarding transparency. I feel it belongs to the Cupertino or Santa Clara community and can benefit from the city or county's legal, compliance,financial, and pool management standards. Maintenance and development of facilities and programs lacking due to ineffective leadership No oversight with this option. Corruption among those in charge has run unabated over the last 20 years. I worry about safety. People use the pool when it's closed and without a lifeguard.the pool right now isn't serving the community with programs the community asked for.Also,the administrative costs are rising. does not function for community's benefit Yes, it looks to me like the facility is currently use,for the most part, as the private play ground of those that run it. YES Bad option Concerned about long term viability of district independence due to small size. Yes. I am not happy about the way the funds are managed and the programs offered. No, I like how things are managed now. Poor governance; lack of transparency Corruption, poor management, misuse of staff and facilities, used for personal use of few, cliques within management with preferred treatment to a selected few, hidden shady practices, meetings are corrupt, one sided, overall pulling wool over public and govt eyes No-This option strongly preferred No oversight by a specific agency of the Board/Management I do not support option 1. (1 am very concerned with the current Governance.) Yes,too much effort and board does not really have time to do a good job. Who overseas the budget aside from the BON i like this idea 11. Option 2:Merger of RRRPD with the City of Cupertino—RRRPD would be dissolved and its functions,services, assets,and liabilities transferred to the City of Cupertino. The City would integrate RRRPD programs and facilities into current City operations and recreation planning. This option assumes that RRRPD's current property tax allocation would be transferred to the City, and that all RRRPD services would be maintained at current levels(or better). Do you have any concerns about Option 2? Seems MUCH better than what we have now Yes, several. Currently a part of our property tax is used exclusively for RRRPD and receive discount at Rancho for it. We would not be willing to continue paying the tax if district merges with city as we will not be sure that our funds are used for RR district. Also, we live in the private community where RR facility is located.This will create a major safety and security issue,with city driving more people to this tiny facility. It will also create extra traffic, parking issues and nuisance to this private community. If city ends up taking over this facility, city would have to approve of this community becoming a gated community and be prepared of entry and exit only being from Bollinger Rd. Also, RR district has an agreement with the Barrington Bridge community since it was built regarding several factors including free facility usage for board meetings and neighborhood events. City would have to honor this agreement. I see no benefits at all in city taking over this district. This would be acceptable over the current management Yes We dont like city take over, it always end ugly Much better idea given the sketchy history Cupertino I believe the city would not have the pool be open year-round,which would effect summer staffing as year round employees would be less inclined to stay. Rancho's swim team quality of swimmers and training would also be neglected. No, I support Option 2 to be implemented as soon as possible. Yes the facility is already crowded with just special district members. Cupertino Yes. I do not want Cupertino to take the Special District as an asset. I do not want the one million dollars in assets transferred to the city or General Fund. If the city does this, I want the Special District to become a park site.That means that the buildings are taken down and the pool filled in and the land becomes a city park for Rancho Rinconada and the East side of Cupertino. Yes,this would be a huge risk to the safety of our kids who play on the streets, due to increased traffic. As it is we have enough non-residents who use our streets as short-cuts and speed through them. If it is decided to transfer over to the city, then we should make our community a gated one to keep it separate from the center. I think the existing structure works well. No. this seems to be the best plan. Cupertino Cupertino Yes. I don't know how the traffic would impact the Richonada community. Especially the security and the usage of the private roads. Cupertino Milpitas Yes We live in the community adjacent to the community center(Barrington Bridge). We are concerned about increased traffic and folks illegally parking in our community. We would like to know what the city plans to do to address this issue. We have a lot people parking in our community and there is no enforcement from the city. Yes, I have concerns for the kids safety, increase in traffic as we use to lane across frequently. Yes Yes This appears to be a scam aimed at putting property taxes paid by Ranch Riconada residents into the Cupertino general fund. I assume this can be done with out my taxes going up. I think the tax allocation should be reallocated not just to the city but could be use for other things like library, school, etc. Make the total tax amount that goes to the city comparable to other residents in Cupertino. Or if the residents pay more than they should get a substantial discount on the services at the pool. Cupertino we do NOT want RRRPD being dissolved and absorbed by the city of Cupertino. We would like to keep RRRPD as an independent recreation and park district since we want to keep the current service No. I think this is the best move. Yes,too much uncertainty with change since I like how things are managed now. Currently, RRRPD residents are assessed a tax that other Cupertino residents are not, and are rewarded with reduced fees when using the facilities. If all Cupertino residents pay the same fees for usage,then all Cupertino residents should be assessed the same property tax. That's fair. Best option Yes. I do have concerns about Option 2. Yes-strongly oppose option 2. Concerned with additional traffic and security issues. City needs to make Barrington bridge community gated if city takes iver RR. Kids play in the streets- high risk with significantly increased traffic if it becomes city run. Major nuisance to residents. RR was private-thats why we decided to move to Barrington bridge. Cannot change terms of RR now. Residents will havevto review legal options if this changes. Employee salaries and benefits I would like the swimming pool and other facilities to be kept open without interruption. I support option 2. No, but would like RRRPD to be upgraded and maintained well. Always thought it was run by the City, so was surprised to see that it wasn't How will it be assured that the tax allocation would only go to this property? Yes 12. Based upon your knowledge of District and the governance options presented in the special study,would you prefer to see Option 1 or Option 2? • Option 1 —27/34% • Option 2—51 /65% • NA-1 /1% 13. Please share any additional comments,your feedback is important to us. Having read about the dissatisfaction of the board's actions on next-door.com, I hope that you adopt option 2 and bring back some sanity. For years,we have not been told how our tax money was spent on that tiny facility. It is time to get it under the sun. I strongly feel that this district is good the way it is. It does not need to be taken over by the city. I believe the city could take better advantage of this recreation site. We like Rancho independent The place is chaotic. We visit other neighbor pools and avoid Rancho specifically. It would be nice to improve it. Integrating the special district, which primarily is located within and serves Cupertino citizens and residents, into the city of Cupertino makes perfect sense.The district is a legacy of the previous Rancho Rinconado separate status within the county prior to the City of Cupertino annexing the area. It's time to merge this special district as well into the city. Option one- keep things the same as they are now is the best course of action. Combining it with city will add complexity in the management and may lost the dedicated focus and attention as of today I'm very disappointed in the board members currently serving,the fallout and angry attacks they placed on outgoing board members who resigned for health & personal reasons-with that kind of behavior I see only burdensome overhead and inexperience in running this entity. I don't even think it's worth the expense to run an election for the board members.This entity should be run by the city. I think RRRPD should be dissolved and its functions and services transferred to the City Barrington Bridge community had a discounted access to the facility. I am concerned we will loose that and in addition. New traffic will go through the community and will adversely impact the security on the neighborhood. Will city take over the maintenance of the road/landscaping? We live in the community adjacent to the community center(Barrington Bridge). We are concerned about increased traffic and folks illegally parking in our community. We would like to know what the city plans to do to address this issue. We have a lot people parking in our community and there is no enforcement from the city. Leave our park alone Do not change if you are 100 percent sure that you can do it better. Show proof that you can do it better. If option 2 is selected. Please make sure that you need to have proof showing that option 2 will serve local residents better than it's now. Having City of Cupertino in charge will ensure efficiencies of scale are employed and proper oversight is exercised. We also will be much more aware of the facility unlike its almost invisible presence up until now. more investigation needs to be done about the financials not matching up. Lafco studies said for years that there is overlap with the Cupertino Parks and Recs and the Rancho Special District. Let's consolidate and make this pool serve the community its been paying millions to for years. would like more programs for senior activities senior swim water aerobics and more community activities for east side. we are happy and satisfied with all the service that our current swim team support to us. Keep RRRPD independently is beneficial for all our residence I think the city could run the facility in a fashion that will be of much greater benefit to the community. having the RRRPD aborpsed by the city will just take away the RRRPD facilities which is only paid for by the RRRRPD households. Shame on the city trying to strong arm their way into this facility. Rancho is a wonderful family swim center which serves the needs of the neighborhood well. Please keep it from changing! Bring back the aqua excercise classes! I enjoy the pool and would like to learn swimming there. It is a community asset. It doesn't seem like a proper audit was done. Audit firm used was located in Sacramento, it wasn't even local. a)The illegally run after school program and its subsequent closure, b) corruption allegations about the use of swimming pool - all points to one thing.The current management must go. Important to improve pool facility as that is the main draw. Also, incorporate schedules into Recreation System for easier awareness building. As a long time resident of Rancho, we love the idea of the RRRPD. Have not used it much since our kids have grown up, but feel it adds a lot to creating a community within our neighborhood. we love this place!!! 14. Please provide your email if you would like to receive eNotification updates regarding this issue. Information Redacted Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting August 6, 2020 CITY OF CUPERTINO PRC 8.6.20 Item #4 Background • Last year, LAFCO commissioned a report • Option 1 : Maintain RRRPD's current governance (status quo) • Option 2: Merger of RRRPD with the City of Cupertino 3 Survey Distribution • Letter was hand delivered to 1 ,295 RRRPD households • Rancho Rinconada project webpage • eNotifications 4 2 PRC 8.6.20 Item #4 Survey Responses 79 Individual Responses Some households had more than one respondent District Household Response Rate: 50 Households (3.9%) Non-District Household Responses: 17 Based upon your knowledge of District and the governance options presented in the special study,would you prefer to see Option 1 or Option 2? Option 1 -27 (34%) Option 2-51 (65%) 5 Master Plan - Aquatics 4.11 Consider adding new major facilities to meet community needs at existing 4.0 Expand swimming and waterplay opportunities. parks,through renovations to existing facilities,or at sites acquired in the i Continue m operate the elacwerry Farm pool complex as a place for future. ' Iseisure and swimming.if fea ble in the future,pursueexpanding the Prepare a business plan prior to developing new major facilities wmmm�g sea Pursue partnerships with otheren-thathaveswimmingpoolsNand to help identify the optimal size,amenities,location,programming,tees, Cupertino,a:pedauy f«,rsed on aernrmg nme for famuy swimming reven and operating model for facilities with high operating costs,such swim Iessons,lap swimming and aquatic exemse. as a performing arts center,an aquatic facility or a gymnasium/recreation ranter.Evaluate grouping similar uses(e.g.,maker space,art studio spas, "' Evaluate providing a new year-mood agnarics complex in the airy based on a business and opera'ores plan that recommends a design program. performing arts)for synergies and operating efficiencies. Cotuider a full range of aquatics programming to provide the most opportunity for users and increase revenue potential.PmAde programs n Evaluate options for joint-use partnerships and/or renovation of existing and tacilitles that focus-varied re fill opponurdties for families and - facilities(public,private or partner)prior to building new ones. for au ages and abilific, rrr Explore potential equity partners,operating partners and sponsors before w Provide more.—play features(splash pads/spray play areas/ planning and designing major facilities. inte did water featuma)for play in warm weather geographically dispersed in the city. iv Consider adding the following facilities in the future,if warranted and desired: - Year-round AquaNcs(see4Cbelow) T4- 6 3 PRC 8.6.20 Item #4 Master Plan - Aquatics ---- aquatics facility opportunities Pursue opportunities to partner with existing ,. y ..,.. w...�.....w. aquatics providers,including schools.If a new - city facility is desired,prepare a market analysis and business plan.If a new,aquatics facility is warranted and pursued,consider providing POTENTIAL ELEMENTS a year-round swimming facility designed for lap pool recreation and instructional swimming,aquatic —ter instructional pool exercise,lap swimming,and pool events. recreation pool hottub SITE SELECTION AND DISTRIBUTION - - - If pursed,develop one facility in an accessible - location,considering sites in central and east water ploy features Cupertino or opportunities to co-develop with Iffeguard/office,space another centralized City facility. locker rooms family changingroomsPOTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES outdoor sho�ers • Memorial Park areaslounge Cmekside Park spectator • ]ollyman Park birthday party rooms concessions • Wilson Park rental_- -_ Potential new site nearby parking • Public-private partnership 7 Next Steps • Additional Community Engagement • Send Another Survey • Include all Cupertino residents • Consider survey questions s 4 CITY OF CUPERTINO CUPERTINO Legislation Text File M 20-8044, Version: 1 Subject: Update on the Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan. CITY OF CUPERTINO Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/6/2020 powered by LegistarTM CITY OF PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT QUINLAN COMMUNITY CENTER 10185 NORTH STELLING ROAD • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-5732 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3120 • FAX: (408) 777-1305 CUPERTINO CUPERTINO.ORG PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting August 6,2020 Subject Update on Parks and Recreation Department Strategic Plan Recommended Action Provide feedback and identify next steps for the Parks and Recreation Department Strategic Plan Discussion The Citywide Parks and Recreation System Master Plan adopted February 2020 provides a framework for establishing priorities and decision-making as the next steps of the Strategic Plan are determined. Items for consideration to guide the process are: • Fiscal Year 2019/20 Funded Projects carried to Fiscal Year 2020/21 • Fiscal Year 2020/21 Funded Projects • Considerations for the Strategic Plan • Evaluating Sites for Strategic Plan Implementation • Options for Moving Forward Due to the impacts of COVID-19, significant reductions were made to the Capital Improvement Program. An update on the Capital Improvement Program will be provided as it pertains to the funding for the Parks and Recreation Department's outdoor spaces and facility enhancements. The Parks and Recreation Commission is being asked to provide input on the following Strategic Plan considerations: Citywide Satellite Gardens: Identify and recommend potential sites for satellite community gardens. Prospective Dog off Leash Area (DOLA) Locations: Identify and recommend potential sites for Dog Off Leash Areas. Park Amenity Improvements: Identify and recommend potential sites for improved amenities such as benches,hydration stations, outdoor table tennis, cornhole, shade (structures and/or trees), pickleball striping,etc. The Commission is being asked how best to approach the review of the large inventory of City parks.Potential ways to evaluate the parks would be by location, such as east side parks;oldest parks in the city;evaluate all parks;evaluate in specific batches; or have sub-groups evaluate parks. Input is requested so that a priority list of projects may be determined. Sustainability Impact No sustainability impact. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impact. Prepared by: Christine Hanel,Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation Reviewed bv:Joanne Magrini,Director of Parks and Recreation Approved for Submission by:Joanne Magrini,Director of Parks and Recreation Attachments: A—Key Opportunities Matrix B—Park Description Matrix C—Park and Facility Map Key-Opportunities Nature Play Provide natu re play elements in •climbable elements such as logs,stumps,boulders, Develop 3 to 4 geographically dispersed a cross the city.Provide play areas in a Short Term:Create a pi lot program at one site,considering a park with parks to connect people to nature mounds and trees mix of community parks,large neighborhood parks,smaller parks and trail good tree canopy and natural features.Evaluate and pursue opportunities and supportexp,r,,nti,l play. water features or water play features flood pump,e.g.) orridors.Locam at least one in a more natural site and in a park where natural for a destination nature play area that incorporates water play elements. sand,mud,wood chips,rocks elements/native plantings exist or are being added.These may replace an ova ble pieces,suchmsbranchesforfon-building existing play area at the and of its lifecycle.Create at least one destination Longer Term:Build a permanent nature play area. •other natural play elements consistent with the site cha racter nature play facility In a more centralized,accessible location. Develop 2-3 additional nature play areas at parks or along trail corridors •plants and trees that are geographically distributed. •butterfly gardens Dog Park(s)/DOU(s) Provide additional dog parks, unfenced off-leash area;may be temporary or permanent and demarcated by signage, Provide two or more additional facilities or off-leash areas to be geographically Short Term:Identify potential sites and determine mailer dog runs,and/or off-leash imilarfeatures distributed(away from existing facility at Mary Avenue).Consider large and neighborhood support.Respond to residents'request for a trial off-leash as. mailer dog run,mid-size dog area,or full size dog park with different fenced areas for small neighborhood parks. dog area.if implemented a nd successful,pursue at additional suitable mall and large dogs sites. •fence,suited to character of park •double entry gate Longer Term:Develop dog runs,off-leash areas or •turf,deco mposed granite,other suitable surfacing,or combination dog parks.Note:the timing may be considered in •dog waste dispensers conjunction with park site master planning. •dog drinking stations water pools seating and picnic tables •shade shelter lighting •topography and landscaping Pickleball Court Provide pickleball courts to diversify•pickleball courts(paired if possible) Provide 4 or more courts to be geographically distributed and tournament Short Term:Develop 2 courts.Consider overlays or recreation and sports opportunities.•tournament-friendly pickleball venue(6+courts) venue In a convenient location.Consider joint-striping of existing tennis courts joint striping of existing tennis courts that only support recreational play. at Varian Park,Monte Vista Park and Memorial Park.(Avoid joint-striping tennis Consider pickleball striping for multi-court tournament venue in courts used forcompetitive play.)Consider providing courts in neighborhoods conjunction with Memorial Park Master Plan. r sites in need of to hni ict fitness activities for seniors and adults. Longer Term:Develop 2 or more additional courts and pickleball complex. Gardens Provide more opportunities for For community gardens: Provide 1-2 or more new community gardens at sim(s)agricult—Ily suitable for Short Term:Develop a community garden healinunity gardens.Pursues combination of in-ground,raised beds,and accessible planting areas growing,based on aspects such as soil conditions,topography and solar access. implementation plan that renovates in a timely g garden.Consider individual reservable plots and group spaces Geographically disperse from existing facility at McClel lan Ranch.Consider manner the existing site at McClellan Ranch and opportunities for gardens of other •fencing,water,composting/green waste recycling locations suitable to support educational and social use,such as near a school or identifies suitable sites and priorities for types in parks,such as native plant hedges or hedgerows senior center.Consider areas of higher residential density with less access to implarn-tation.Add at least one or more community gardens in an demonstration gardens,rain seating,shade gardening space.Consider smaller,neighborhood -scalegardens at more underutilized area or gardens and orchards. For Healing garden: no mar-locations.Identify.van ue for a healing garden that is agriculturally needed lawn area within a park,preferably in an •garden showcasing healing plants suitable and can accommodate ntrnded features and visltorship. a ree with higher density population. informational/educational elements Other gardens: Longer Term:Evaluate demand and needs for •demonstration garden showcasing methods of gardening or different plant palettes additional community gardens.Implement such as organic gardening techniques,xeriscaping,native species,plantings for additional community gardens accordingly.Select a pollinators,birds and wildlife location and support implementation of a healing •bird baths and bird houses garden.Consider development of other types of min garden and stormwmter garden elements horticultural gardens. orchards or permaculture plantings sister ci -si red ardens Improved Comfort&Amenities Provide amenities to create seatingwithshade through structures or plantings Consider needs at all parks.(Small neighborhood parks may not need restrooms Short Term:Update amenities and furnishings at 1-2 welcoming,inclusive,safe,and •state shelters(with movable tables/chairs,picnic tables,or other mating) or pa rking,e.g.) sites in conjunction with other park projects.Prioritize pa rks with trails, omfortable parks for people of al l variety of seating options and groupings with active walkers and that lack shade. ages and Cultural groups.Integrate •restrooms where appropriate enities to reflect park character. •drinking fountains/bottle fillers/dog drinking dishes Longer Term:Seek to provide comfort improvements •lighting at one site every year,distributed throughout the •trash/recycling receptacles system. parking •permeable paving •bike racks,docking stations •alternative transportation pickup/drop offs •an)playable,Integrated,stand-alone,and/or temporary displays) •signage and wayfinding interpretive elements,information kiosks coif to-working stations/outdoor work space multilingual or icon-based signage Key-Park Descriptions Vision/Focus Recent/Planned Improvements Immediate/Short Term Opportunities Memorial Park Community hub and multi-use,civic- The tennis courts were resurfaced in 2017.Landscaping Consider repurposing the inactive pond,renovating the focused event space. in front of Quinlan was renovated in 2018 with drought amphitheater,adding walking path improvements and tolerant planting and drip irrigation. playable feature,enhancing the tree canopy,integrating natural features,expanding recreation facilities to enhance indoor and outdoor event space,community gathering space, active/healthy recreation uses and play opportunities. Stevens Creek Corridor Park Community-focused natural area Replastering of the pools,a feasibility study is funded to Complete the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan,enhance supporting environmental education, identify alternatives for improving pedestrian and bike natural/habitat areas and facilities supporting environmental outdoor gathering and recreation access at the San Fernando entry. education,gatherings and recreation uses.Provide consent with protecting wildlife and connections to the Stevens Creek Trail. habitat value. Creekside Park Neighborhood recreation and sports The restrooms were renovated in 2018.Unused turf was Nature play and/or inclusive play elements,enhancements to hub. recently replaced with drought-tolerant plants and drip recreation diversity,enhance recreation building and irrigation. reactivate or repurpose the concession area,sustain existing uses. Hoover Park Neighborhood park and recreation No currently planned improvements.Within the last 5 Sustain existing use and sports space. years,new benches and picnic tables were installed, trees were planted around the play structure and a walkway to it added,drought tolerant plantings and drip irrigation installed,as well as trees and more efficient irrigation. Jollyman Park Neighborhood and community hub Accessibility upgrades were added in 2018 at the north All inclusive play area,grouped seating,picnic shelter,all- for sports,recreation programs and playground as well as a walkway to the south playground weather loop path(including east side of the park), activities. from Stelling Rd.A drinking fountain with water bottle neighborhood-serving event utilities and infrastructure, filler was added in 2018.An inclusive playground project sustain existing uses,DOLA. has been approved.Benches were recently added,the fence at the Sterling Rd.entry replaced and extended, and trees planted in the southwest part of the site. Linda Vista Park Neighborhood and community hub No currently planned improvements.Within the last 5 Select design concept to repair or repurpose the inactive for picnicking and nature-based years,new benches and picnic tables were installed, ponds.Sustain existing uses. recreation. trees were planted around the play structure and a walkway to it added,drought tolerant plantings and drip irrigation installed,as well as trees an Monta Vista Park&Rec Center Neighborhood recreation and sports The tennis courts were resurfaced in 2017. Consider temporary options to expand play opportunities near hub. preschool.Consider restriping tennis courts to share for pickleball,explore opportunities to relocate or expand gymnastics/martial arts and preschool programs to other facilities,sustain existing uses. Portal Park Neighborhood park and gathering No currently planned improvements.The concrete area Improve walkway lighting and signage,explore options to space. behind the recreation building was recently improved. share adjacent school parking,sustain existing uses. Varian Park Neighborhood park with tennis, The tennis courts were resurfaced in 2017.Minor Consider expanding or replacing play area with nature play or passive recreation,orchard and accessibility upgrades to the entry were constructed in thematic inclusive play elements,consider restriping tennis habitat focus. 2017. courts to share for pickleball,consider other enhancements for recreation diversity,sustain existing uses. Wilson Park Neighborhood and community hub Drought tolerant and native plantings with drip irrigation Consider adding neighborhood-serving event utilities and for sports,recreation and activities. were recently installed. infrastructure,picnic shelter,and a large/full size basketball court.Sustain existing uses. Canyon Oak Park Play node for local use. No currently planned improvements Maintain orientation to the view of open space.Sustain existing uses. Franco Park Neighborhood park No currently planned improvements.Park is less than 10 Sustain existing uses,consider adding shade and small group years old. seating,improve pedestrian and bicycle access from Franco Court,evaluate possible on-street parking and crosswalk to Franco Court access point. Little Rancho Park Play node for local use. No currently planned improvements. Sustain existing uses. Somerset Park Neighborhood park No currently planned improvements.Trees and planting Sustain existing uses. were recently added throughout the park. Sterling Barnhart Park Play node with trail connection No currently planned improvements.Trees were recently Sustain existing uses,consider effects of an extension of planted along the frontage,and a concrete walkway and Saratoga Creek Trail or the acquisition of Lawrence Mitty mowband added. property. Three Oaks Park Neighborhood park with nature No currently planned improvements.Additional benches Sustain existing uses. emphasis. were recently installed. Civic Center/Library Field Multi-use civic area for green space, A storage area for sports equipment was installed in Sustain existing pending uses pending decision on recreation,and gatherings. 2017.A design for a trail along Regnart Creek is in implementation of Civic Center Master Plan and cricket field preparation.Adjacent landscaping at City Hall was long-term location.Consider creating a separate parcel for renovated in 2017 for turf reduction and to showcase Library Field and rezoning it as PR zoning. drought-tolerant plantings.The interactive fountain was re-opened in 2017. imltz ' Elementary Gr ant Stocklmeir Parr ; Elementary R a or Parr Parks & Serra Parr SUNNYVALE � � , � Recreation' LOS ALTO , ■ ;.■ Ortega { WestValle CupertinoPrrDepartment . L ,{ diddle + , i Elementary cho of 13 — Homestead Rd • { .{ +, ti," 1'S.{� ; '1 . 14Little * �� Homestead , . . { ,{• , {' , , , Franco Park ParkSANTA High school, u}} eyo ,y r. L r: Map of '.41 'in + f ExistingParks , Open Space 7 { + ,• ;,7 { , ■ a { , {I 7 7 { , ■ + ,• ■�7 { , ■ a { , { ■ Garden Gate{ " + 7 I + ■ + I Rancho . + 1 + " + I. Park 15 �} Ma v�rood • . • , , " , . , nrEI I I I nt{.�r `a� r" San'Antonio': ;�O" , . 5 1 _ � Parr Rancho.... { . County Parr {I,■ { ,,, :, ■ :",�, Lawson i--� � � Westwoodand � I� tion Resources • an ntorl •7'. . • ■ 7 7 . . L� Collins ' Oaks a { .{ , 1 ■ { •{ 1 ■' d + 6 1 1 . - Mar }eve 1Yliddle -a; 1 Va s Park • . ■ en Space '.. ■ . . , a — ■ + , �rese , " , , .d. . " ,;• ! . 1 ' School _ Elem entar} a+ { • ' rve: + + { . • { . + y,{ anran og Park _ r • Stevens Creek * ��' '1'''{' ■+:1'1' �::.'' •.. yak r Elementar ° ' Jenn Eisenhower .. :•{ , �� ,• . , .,;'' Park ", _ Main street Elementary ■ {. " ,r. �`•_ memorial 10 I Strand ;{ .'I. +{. + �� - Park _ I 12 Por#al Parr Parr Varian Par 1G • ' V : Park ?Tav, r� 1 • . 1 !t 1 1: { { , ' :•, I # " " { � � ' ' 'F'+rp�rt � �por#s Center •��Square I _ Stew it k 8Nd � � Cali dill r' • S#ocklmeir Plaza +Ranch p � i _ �. Cupertino Parks and TrailsFaria Center Park e _ BI ackberry Fa rn Elementary ' it son * Golf bourse Sena City Hall ` 17 Park r ' Cupertino Community Parrs Mon a Vista Recreation � � % S chool =. College -�_ J _ I Center Park 1 + Ciic� ommuni 'Hall '' - - r I -F, " . _ I __i Parr I +.—� a John Lameleighborhood Parrs • Blackberry Farm Park �erti no I � � l�li se . `.� . McClellan MiKiellan Rd Lil rar 4 -r reeksi�e Sterling Parr Small Neighborhood Parrs Flanch West a - 5 ' Barn h ar# onta Field a Park 0 Sedgwicr . � �C1fW� � � � � ..• .� Park Special Use bites I Vista Percolation ;' do Elementary Archbishop c l el la n High Lincoln: Pond I Eaton I Mitt High School Fields Managed b City - - Ranch school Elementary � � Elementary � �•• � � School • �— Preserve N, ■` Hyde Middle -Rancho 094000410 Shared-Use Paths -- pep CI i '�. Ienned i dd le School Rinconada v I col f Course School 8 � - M 4 ` . . _ De Vargas Other Recreation Resources •� •�-� '� �' ' ' a of lyman Park Elementary •�•�•�• `•� " . �. R Linda � _ � Local Parrs open to Public Dilworth 9Vista Elementary County Parrs Regional Open Space Preserves + IV Park T _ - ! eyerho Iz { • J{ 7 , Stevens ' ■ �. i . ■{ ' , { �* � — Elementary lulu rdo cr-Portal County' '# _ E I emen tar School s and Colleges 11' Park � Miller golf Course " ' I Regnant ,a - Calabasas Middle � 7 ,7• Elementary — Parr School MurdockPark ' Three yaks Rainbm Dr Recreation nter sf Field s , ; '■ fir- _ Park 18 .11 did " ' I - L - Rai nbo High h School of Saratoga RecreationCenters/Facilities iii ■ ......... y ' '■`W . +{. ■ '1 .•{ • , I - �, Parr g Creek Parr I % Stevei i iii I. J0 Other Facilities ' • � r••r� ,••ram,■ 5 � .'' .+ , Creek •,{, F., + {: a :' + { Hoover Park Ay l J E A N J O E " ', a +"{ •' ','' { ■+ ;; Reservlllr- :..{ ,• + '■ " { ■+{I'1. ,•'+ '■ + ++1 yz 4 Base Map Features �;' {■ {, • " {{ • �:. ' ,■ { ' { .{ Fremont Ide'r {' - PTOSp Rd Cupertino itly� Poundarly� + 1 +{ I " ■ ". 1 '■ {' i, +{ 1 " ■ "+ 1 ''a{ 0 pp e n Space . ' { '{ { ,■, ' {'■ • !■ ' { '{ { ,,, ' {•■ F. ' {' { ' { {� { '�'',,, ' ,'■ Preserve ; { '{ { { �• : ; : , ' : Cupertino here of Influence * , Pi1Jcche tti Ranch '+{ " . • '' " 1'"• ' { '"}' " I " { • '' r " I " { •� ' '' " 1'J '+{ ■ " " { I P P aJ en Space 'll + , , • ', • '.• ' •. ,'ll • .".+ .. , •• '.• ".+ :. ', '.• ' :. I'll • ".+ {f Railroad •.•■ 7 1 ■ { {■ F-'/ -'■ •7 ■'. •7 { L ■ • 7 1 ■ { {■ • ■ ■'. •7 i l • ■ •'� 77 ■'. •7 { L ■ ■ 7 1 ■ { {' • , 1 •{ .'7 , r e Se r V e , {.■ .{+ 8� " •+ {, • { ■ "{+ ■ 1 ■•{ a + {, •r ■ I ■•{ „ " •+ i I ■ {.■ I ! ... f` ,{ ■ • y 7a,' 7 , ','. .'y • • ''{ ■ • �7 7 ,' 7 , •,.'. , 7 • • ' ■ { ' �7 7'1' 7 1 ■ ��' , • ' S 7 7',' 7 , '■'7 1'■ +{ �■+ 5■{ + ' 1'77 'I, ■ + • 1'■ +{ ■+ 5�i + 1,177 ''■. , . 1'"{ '+ 5'i + 1,177 1■. , 1'1 "{ •+ �'i + . Creeks and Channels . � "■■+' {,{ ,;{ +' • ' +' {,{ ',+{ ' + {; • .,,+• {;{ ', ., + {; :{ • .,,+• {;{.',+ SALR LTO AL I {' ■+ 1; ■■. '•'+ IN " .1 ■+ •1; ■■+ '+ '■ "M1 + { . ■+ 1; ■■+ '•'+ ■ "' , . . 14 ■+ ' ■■ Water Bodies in 1 J 1 �' + 1 ■ 1 �' 1 + 1 on ■ �' 1 ■ .77 ■ , . , ,77 ■ 7 . ,77 1 ■ ME I ME 41 ME " . 1 " " ' Stevens' " • { 1 ; ± i 1,■ I I 1 i 1 11 1,• Creek ' ; 1■ 1 { 1,■ I I ' , ,� : ': . :'1' ■". ' ,"• ' + { „' 11 ' : ' • + I'J County Miles ,,•.', ,• ■, , .', ', y j { "{, ,,'•.', ,• ■, . {. , . .Park . •.', , {. , 1 , { ', 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1,25 1.5 , ■ y, February 2018 ■';' {','� ■';' ■';' {','� '{' • , ■'. Note. der Local Aenc Form at ion ornrnission { " Sources; City of Cupertino and Santa Clara County, 2017. 1 Stevens Creek 4 Library Field 7 Hoover 10 Memorial Park 13 Franco Park 16 Varian Corridor Park Sterling Barnhart Creekside Park Joll man Monta Vista Little Rancho Wilson Items in green are 2 g 5 8 y 11 14 17 � r . F Park on the East side of unded Projects Cupertino 3 Civic Center Plaza 6 Canyon Oak Park 9 Linda Vista 12 Portal Park 15 Somerset 18 Three Oaks Park PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 Strategic Plan Guidance Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting August 6, 2020 0 CUPERTINO 1 Agenda • FY 2019/20 Funded Projects Carried to FY 2020/21 • FY 2020/21 Funded Projects Considerations for the Strategic Plan Evaluation for Strategic Plan Implementation Next Steps 2 1 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 FY 2019/20 Funded Projects Carried Over to FY 2020/21 Prol. I RENEW- Amount Description ■ All Inclusive Playground at Jollyman $5.53M Design and construct an all-inclusive playground at Park ($1.44M grant) Jollyman Park. On Hold Citywide Satellite Gardens $300,000 Identify sites and build additional community garden(s). Community Gardens at McClellan $1.2M Renovate the community gardens at McClellan Ranch Ranch,and implement a new process and procedures for a more effective,community-driven gardens program. Preschool Shade Structure $125,000 Design and construct a new shade structure over the existing play area and sand box at the preschool. Seismic Retrofit at Sports Center $1.275M Design and construct structural upgrades to the Sports Center for increased resiliency in the event of an earthquake. Lawrence/Mitty $8.27M Acquire a parcel at Lawrence Expressway near Milly (Purchase& Ave for trail expansion and park development. Development) Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan $610,000 Study the various uses of public lands along Stevens Creek for optimal public use and operation. 3 FY 2020/21 Funded Projects id K61 - • • Park Amenity Improvements $200,000 Annual Playground Replacement $300,000 BBF Golf Course Alternatives $50,000 Analysis 4 2 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 New Project Annual Playground Replacement �il 41' DESCRIPTION Replacement of older playground equipment -- that is dated and wom starting with Creekside(1998)and Varian(2002) Estimated Project Cost: 5300,000 annually Location: City-wide Funding:General Fund Requesting Dept.: Public Works PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The playground at several City playgrounds is over 18 years old with the equipment at Creekside park over 22 years old.The equipment is worn and dated.This project allows for the replacement of the equipment on an annual replacement schedule starting with the oldest to the newest. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACTS: The staff time is incvded in the operating budget. 5 Park Amenity Improvements DESCRIPTI N Funding for various park amenities-cf,as benches,hydration stations,outdoor table tennis,romhoh,shade(structures and/or // trees),dogof-least,pic leball striping,etc Estimated Project Cost SlAW,000(5-year tota) Location:City-wide $200,000 Annually Funding:General Fund Requesting Dept: Public Works PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This project provides a funding r-c anism to respond to dozen regncsts for minor park amenities in a cost effective and timely manner.Citizen suggestions for minor park improvements should be encouraged and supported.Approval of this project will allow the City to respond to such requests. OPERATING BUDGET ABACTS: A slight impact to the Operating Budget is anticipated in order to install these park improvements. 6 3 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 Strategic Plan Considerations I Description Recreation Elements and Identify and recommend potential Improved Comfort and Amenities sites for improved amenities such as benches,hydration stations, outdoor table tennis,cornhole, shade(structures and/or trees), pickleball striping,etc. Citywide Satellite Gardens Identify and recommend potential sites for satellite community gardens Prospective DOLA Locations Identify and recommend potential sites for Dog Off Leash Areas 7 Evaluation Form- _ Recreation Elements/ Garbage Hydration Benches/ Shade Outtloor Table Other(eg.Mile Markers, Pickleball Striping Cans/Rerycling Cornhole Improved Comfort and stations Bins Picnic Tables (trees/structured tennis InGusive Elements) Amenities Master Plan Rating 1-5 Rating 2-5 Rating 1-5 Rating 1-5 Rating 1-5 Rating 1-5 Rating 1-5 Item Rating 1-5 Memorial Park x Stevens Creek Corridor Park :a• ear... Creekside Park Hoover Park Jollyman Park Linda Vista Park Monte Vista Park&Rec renter x Portal Park Varian Park x Wilson Park .a• ear... Canyon Oak Park Franco Park Little Rancho Park Somerset Park Sterling Barnhart Park Three Oaks Park Civic Center Plaza Library Field Rams marked under master plan were recommended for that specific topic(reference Key for details on each taplc) Rating of 1-5 11=not recommended 5=highly remmmended) 8 4 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 Evaluation Form- DOLAs/Gardens DogPark(s)/DOLn(s) satellite Community Gardens Master Plan Rating 1-5 Master Plan Rating 1-5 • Memorial Park Stevens Creek Corridor Park x Creekside Park x x Hoover Park x x Jollyman Park x x Linda Vista Park x x Monta Vista Park&Rec Center x x Portal Park x x Varian Park x x Wilson Park x x Canyon Oak Park Franco Park Little Rancho Park Somerset Park x x Sterling Barnhart Park Three Oaks Park x x Civic Center Plaza Library Field Items marked undsr'Master Plan"were recommended tar thatspeclflc topic ireference Key tar detailson each topitl Rating of 1-5 11=not recommended 5=h1ghly recommendedl 9 Key-Opportunities - rmpwreeranrzrtaureraen p w_Ism II g rn pa y neee rmmo upeare ers(w'M ahlez/rM1airslapini rabies,or meer seaungy rg e�gsiar rm p wnM1r , .ally a.mag ovmarragiaaparg. .nAre..Ik...•id mxl.rk:wm. niviesw reAen parF ma umaim/phon g le NleN 1,annking alsM1B e .I�drmrg .. rvrcv� and.a rnmagnau<<n. tin/.m g revaae: n 1p2nn arg.l wa/or w ry par9 wayrne a1— erslry rssfoah alt ponluel eamna sp pp nu urnamem-men vp eeaa venue iv: rm o nal mexgsarg .rnnrysu p �rplpvoi ameor vencein rya crn nro� r a.an rnwaaml nn u.m.pl.a. m neee nr wwamparxrrmesa aervnies wr senors ane aeul¢ eon p.nl.]Ipoubl mg cola, w w.+ry Pe .a.m.aa a.rre 1br.�gaag.. .agar po<.mi.l.nes and a.e..m�a. marax-yea: eiawa rn„n.raane.am�rrry a+N=rv��i.moose ge ee nmp�m ga m,�namee�a g, mnea.wnn rn rgapiry an munnycareem nie.kr - si Wag,k 1—diywnaeu fors a su a e � impememawn. mgarawmar�r n an aaeaamleplam�ng are,: �ree,n��aaenna�amarea nr W�md an p p r a�w mgn.. n a�etlaan na erewrl�ns a ra ampw�uemr. w qam ee�a oremgerows g� � erouslrcawru si rsmaller. 6 iMoo-sr 6 ns armme unlN 6areense lam iuonal rommuarry gar nzaao gy 10 5 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 =27-111=11.1,=d I,I,I,1 7 een ors fezhrn•rmreamnmm Pay'PP umnn. "n, ........................ aced P11W.1h. I p I— 5 z= Mire planxed ne play I�d adhmma zl merry 1. =1.I1..I1 law =e .pap—.— p- .1d he ltsaz.softball area Z Th'.'M I .1 P—Il,' ass—il ll-d Web rap I—- leas Key Perk DlrIpl Guyon Oak Park Playnode for Meal use. N.,—IV pI.d,NVN rtgalnraM odenutlonmtMvreap of open space.S leanly MM'll, . sNad..M smallgroup pll,&.1l and bcYd. from r.— [oun,evaluate poufile on0 w1lbl,II;Ill,ld Mv—for 11 Sommer Park HIll park IAIV pI.dpbees arrd pI.N1k% duualn Ill leanly lox".d�j re receMty added IN 11191 the 5-11,ka.hFah M,—WthWW � ,` ' --I.a (2010) 1d along IN, INA 111 1"�Il, I a�._Vim=WmAdm property. IN'.Oa.part WlffiPA wth N Ho suneMlY pI.d'WAtltlltlonal benches play area-IA 11" emphasis. —1y'l-Alk a. Mlull A f,(PI ll=b.,FkI "I"P11 51111 IAI�1,9,plld 19 1—�.Ihg d.l on ..d I—) dNd gfl 1 11 I1I1d,.ckf4d wll,l,..d.n.Adj. Nd—pIng."'y g C.,. P...parcel for 1A ll�M.7 Pot t1ff retlunaon.1d to IhIl— uhrary FIl and rexoning 11 as ft dFIXIII Plall!JngI.The 111dve fllltlll was emn mar. 12 6 PRC 8.6.20 Item #5 -- _ ❑ Perks& Recreation I Fcu oDepartment MaP of E R.Parks,.Pan Sp— andd R¢cr¢oXon Reso.— urc¢s .c I , I r 9 a i �W x _ - �,oiNm.a a ww raw:„ u u ias.�rw vwl�" e rasa a 9.. 6 c.,ron o.k a.,E 9 r�nea wu uro.i.i a.,k ]s samrur 10 R.mwkt Puk 13 Next Steps 0 Evaluate east side parks ] Evaluate oldest parks ❑ Evaluate all parks ❑ Evaluate in batches or all at once ❑ Have sub-groups to evaluate a batch of parks 14 7 CITY OF CUPERTINO CUPERTINO Legislation Text File#: 20-8045, Version: 1 Subject: Receive Monthly Update Reports from: - Director - Commissioners CITY OF CUPERTINO Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/6/2020 powered by LegistarTM