10-20-2021 Final BPC PacketCITY OF CUPERTINO
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION
AGENDA
This will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location
Wednesday, October 20, 2021
7:00 PM
Teleconference Meeting
TELECONFERENCE / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION TO HELP STOP THE
SPREAD OF COVID-19
In accordance with Government Code 54953(e), this will be a teleconference meeting
without a physical location to help stop the spread of COVID-19.
Members of the public wishing comment on an item on the agenda may do so in the
following ways:
1) E-mail comments by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 20 to the Commission at
bikepedcommission@cupertino.org. These e-mail comments will be received by the
commission members before the meeting and posted to the City’s website after the
meeting.
2) E-mail comments during the times for public comment during the meeting to the
Commission at bikepedcommission@cupertino.org. The staff liaison will read the emails
into the record, and display any attachments on the screen, for up to 3 minutes (subject to
the Chair’s discretion to shorten time for public comments). Members of the public that
wish to share a document must email bikepedcommission@cupertino.org prior to speaking.
3) Teleconferencing Instructions
Members of the public may observe the teleconference meeting or provide oral public
comments as follows:
Oral public comments will be accepted during the teleconference meeting. Comments may
be made during “oral communications” for matters not on the agenda, and during the
public comment period for each agenda item.
To address the Commission, click on the link below to register in advance and access the
meeting:
Page 1
1
BPC 10-20-2021
1 of 56
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda October 20, 2021
Online
Register in advance for this webinar:
https://cityofcupertino.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_33lKLM0STqCEDdgATRlUSg
Phone
Dial 669 900 6833 and enter Webinar ID: 927 7379 2834 (Type *9 to raise hand to speak)
Unregistered participants will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number.
Or an H.323/SIP room system:
H.323:
162.255.37.11 (US West)
162.255.36.11 (US East)
213.19.144.110 (Amsterdam Netherlands)
213.244.140.110 (Germany)
103.122.166.55 (Australia)
69.174.57.160 (Canada)
Meeting ID: 927 7379 2834
SIP: 92773792834@zoomcrc.com
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about
joining the webinar.
Please read the following instructions carefully:
1. You can directly download the teleconference software or connect to the meeting in your
internet browser. If you are using your browser, make sure you are using a current and
up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain
functionality may be disabled in older browsers, including Internet Explorer.
2. You will be asked to enter an email address and a name, followed by an email with
instructions on how to connect to the meeting. Your email address will not be disclosed to
the public. If you wish to make an oral public comment but do not wish to provide your
name, you may enter “Cupertino Resident” or similar designation.
3. When the Chair calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on “raise hand.”
Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak.
4. When called, please limit your remarks to the time allotted and the specific agenda
topic.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to
Page 2
2
BPC 10-20-2021
2 of 56
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda October 20, 2021
attend this teleconference meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability
that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48
hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in
advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the
meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative
format.
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1.Subject: September 15, 2021 Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve September 15, 2021 Minutes
A - Draft Minutes
POSTPONEMENTS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter
within the jurisdiction of the Commission and not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect
to a matter not on the agenda.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
OLD BUSINESS
2.Subject: Future Agenda Items (Eschelbeck)
Recommended Action: Develop and Maintain a List of Future Agenda Items for the
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
3.Subject: City of Sunnyvale Vision Zero Program (Tsang)
Recommended Action: Receive Presentation on the City of Sunnyvale's Vision Zero
Program
4.Subject: City of San Jose Vision Zero Program (Mintz-Roth)
Recommended Action: Receive Presentation on the City of San Jose's Vision Zero
Program
NEW BUSINESS
STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS
5.Subject: Staff Update and Commissioner Activity Report (All)
Page 3
3
BPC 10-20-2021
3 of 56
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda October 20, 2021
Recommended Action: Receive Updates from Staff and Commissioners Regarding
Recent Activities
FUTURE AGENDA SETTING
ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this
teleconference meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special
assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the
meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability,
meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available
in the appropriate alternative format.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members after publication of the agenda will
be made available for public inspection. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office in City Hall located at
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014, during normal business hours.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code section
2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff
concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These
written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet
archives. Do not include any personal or private information in written communications to the City
that you do not wish to make public, as written communications are considered public records and will
be made publicly available on the City website.
Members of the public are entitled to address the members concerning any item that is described in the
notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the
members on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment.
Page 4
4
BPC 10-20-2021
4 of 56
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
21-9972 Agenda Date:
10/20/2021 Agenda #: 1.
Subject: September 15, 2021 Minutes
Approve September 15, 2021 Minutes
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 10/13/2021Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™5
BPC 10-20-2021
5 of 56
DRAFT MINUTES
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION
September 15, 2021
Draft Minutes
The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Jack Carter, Gerhard Eschelbeck (Chair), Ilango Ganga (Vice Chair), Erik
Lindskog
Absent: Maanya Condamoor
Staff: David Stillman, Staff Liaison
Others Present: Chris Corrao, Senior Transit & Transportation Planner, Cherie
Walkowiak, Safe Routes to School Coordinator
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. August 18, 2021 Minutes
Commissioner Carter motioned to approve the minutes as presented, Vice Chair Ganga
seconded the motion. Motion passed 3-0, Condamoor & Lindskog absent
POSTPONEMENTS
None.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
OLD BUSINESS
2. Future Agenda Items
Carmen Road Bridge
Public places for bike racks
Education on how to use two-stage left turn boxes
Path between Lincoln Elementary and Monta Vista High School
6
BPC 10-20-2021
6 of 56
Touchless pedestrian push buttons
The impact of semi-rural designation on bike and ped projects/priorities
Adaptive traffic signal pilot update
Multi-modal traffic count pilot update
Junipero Serra Trail
Reassess the Intersection at Bubb Rd/McClellan Rd
Vision Zero
Stevens Creek Boulevard, Phases 1-3
Bicyclist legally allowed behavior at stop signs
Commissioner Lindskog joined the meeting at 7:12 p.m.
3. Cupertino 2021 Fall Bike Fest
Cherie Walkowiak, Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Coordinator discussed the event
details, event highlights, family ride details and Commissioner responsibilities for the
2021 Fall Bike Fest. The standard activities will be the bike rodeo, a bike ride, the
blender bike smoothie, some vendors, a bike mechanic, helmet fits, contests, first aid,
and the Mayoral Address. Some new highlights planned are a ‘How to Lock your Bike’
clinic, bike bells for the bike rodeo participants, and art and poetry.
Chair Eschelbeck asked if people were going to wear helmets. Ms. Walkowiak said
helmets were mentioned on all the publicity. Chair Eschelbeck asked again about
helmets, wondering if they were required. Ms. Walkowiak said there was no helmet
policy and in the past, it was not required; it is the law for riders under age 18. David
Stillman, Transportation Manager said it was best to stick with the law and it would be
difficult to enforce a helmet requirement that was stricter than prescribed by law.
Commissioner Lindskog agreed to do the bike blender smoothie.
Ms. Walkowiak inquired about the Ride Coordination Meeting date and if a
Commissioner would volunteer for the ‘How to lock your bike’ Clinic. Commissioner
Carter volunteered. Before the Bike Fest, a Coordination Meeting needed to be held, and
the day of the Bike Fest, a meeting with all the chaperones needed to be held. It was
decided to hold the Coordination Meeting on Thursday at 6:00 p.m. The Chaperone
Meeting was scheduled for Saturday. Ms. Walkowiak agreed to send out a timetable to
all the volunteers for the day of the event.
4. Cupertino Vision Zero Program
Chair Eschelbeck recapped the last Vision Zero Program discussion and recalled there
was talk of forming a Subcommittee. He thought goals should be established, then the
7
BPC 10-20-2021
7 of 56
formation of a Subcommittee, with two Commissioners. Lastly, a regular check-in
needed to be established. Vice Chair Ganga suggested having Task Members or staff
members from neighboring jurisdictions present at the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
(Commission).
Commissioner Carter thought the hardest part was getting the Task Force together
because it included the Mayor’s Office, Police Department, etc. He wondered how big
the Task Force needed to be. Chair Eschelbeck agreed and thought it was beneficial to
have representatives from neighboring cities that have a Vision Zero program visit the
Commission first. Commissioner Carter said a lot of what Portland, Oregon did was
gather data, build on maps, and identify school routes. He thought enforcement was a
big issue as well; there needed to be a buy in from the community and local law
enforcement.
Commissioner Carter discussed ways to encourage drivers to reduce speed. Rainbow
Drive was reconfigured so that it was uncomfortable to go fast. Commissioner Lindskog
suggested narrowing lanes. High speed intersections were the biggest problem; he
wondered how to reduce speed there. Vice Chair Ganga thought enforcement was not
the highest priority. Task Forces were important because all the stake holders were
brought in; Task Forces were something that were brought out as an Action Item from
the Vision Zero Policy. After the Policy is established, then appropriate stake holders
needed to be identified for the City of Cupertino. Typically, a Task Force meets
quarterly to review progress and review data; enforcement was going to come later.
Chair Eschelbeck thought the question was ‘how will the Commission get started.’ He
agreed with having someone visit the Commission, someone who was part of an
established Vision Zero program. Commissioner Carter thought it was good to find a
representative that was part of a city that was comparable to Cupertino. Vice Chair
Ganga did not think it would do any harm to get information from a larger city. Since
the City of Sunnyvale was a neighboring city, Cupertino had to coordinate with them
because Cupertino shares boundaries with them. The City of San Jose has things like a
data analytics tool to help collect data and a Geographic Information System (GIS) map.
This helps residents see an average in the form of statistics for the past five years. They
also identified problematic corridors so they can prioritize their work. So, Cupertino can
learn from a large city like San Jose, and just scale the formats down to fit Cupertino.
Chair Eschelbeck asked David Stillman, Transportation Manager to coordinate with the
cities of Sunnyvale and San Jose to see if a representative could visit the Commission.
8
BPC 10-20-2021
8 of 56
Vice Chair Ganga recalled there was mention of goal setting and the Subcommittee
working with staff. He wanted to know the Commission’s thoughts on how to proceed
with those. Chair Eschelbeck suggested goal setting after there was more context from
neighboring agencies.
NEW BUSINESS
5. Cupertino E-Scooters
Chris Corrao, Senior Transit & Transportation Planner gave a presentation on Electronic
Bicycles and Scooters (e-bikes/e-scooters) and how that connects to shared micro
mobility. His presentation entailed what it is, why do it now, what the plan is, and how
to measure success.
Vice Chair Ganga inquired of the kinds of micro mobility options considered for
Cupertino. Mr. Corrao wanted to leave options open when he sought feedback from the
public, but e-bikes and e-scooters were the most popular.
Commissioner Carter did not know the rules for operating electronic mobility in
Cupertino; he wondered if people knew how to ride e-bikes/scooters and if they knew
what the laws were. Mr. Corrao said some knew the rules and added that the law says
any electrified device needs to be in the bike lane and is limited to 15 miles per hour.
The institution of the program would include significant outreach to schools. There
would be a helmet program and an education program.
Bob Walsh, public speaker works for a vendor that would be interested in working with
the City. He commented that there is a lot of education that takes place, as part of the
vendor implementation. Many people were familiar with these programs, so he did not
think the learning curve would be steep.
Commissioner Lindskog did not think scooter parking was too big of a problem.
Chair Eschelbeck wondered how the pilot was envisioned, versus implementation. Mr.
Corrao envisioned virtual hubs at high activity locations, such as coffee shops or along
Stevens Creek Boulevard. People could ride them during the day, and at night, they
would be charged and brought back to those key locations. Separately, he wanted the
Commission’s feedback on having some in neighborhoods because it was convenient.
Chair Eschelbeck wondered how to ensure scooters were properly returned so there
were no scooters in the walkways. Mr. Corrao said this was why a pilot made sense
because it gave staff the ability to test the waters and to end it if there was a negative
response. Chair Eschelbeck inquired if the model allowed people to leave the scooters
9
BPC 10-20-2021
9 of 56
anywhere, of if they had to be brought back to some specified location. Mr. Corrao
envisioned virtual hubs where people could get the devices, the rider could ride them
anywhere, and then at night they would be picked up and brought back to those hubs.
He suggested asking the community if there were specific areas they wanted blocked
out, such as schools or large private employers.
Vice Chair Ganga observed mopeds, e-scooters, and e-bikes in other cities, and he
noticed people used them as a one-way commute. He thought the virtual hubs were a
good idea, including at multi-unit housing areas.
Chair Eschelbeck wanted to know the requirements for someone to participate. Mr.
Walsh said a person needed to be 18 and it is not a requirement to use a bike helmet.
The rider would first scan their driver’s license and take a picture of themselves (the
picture needed to match the license for use of the device), then they needed to take a
tutorial. Mr. Corrao thought a California State Identification would work for use. He
noted that the age limit for e-bikes was much lower.
Mr. Corrao mentioned that Cupertino was trying to partner with Sunnyvale, which
allowed for a much larger ridership.
Chair Eschelbeck inquired about the 18-month commitment. Mr. Corrao said 16 months
was a good amount of time to tell if the pilot worked, but it did not need to be that long.
6. Class IV Separated Bikeway Concrete Barriers
David Stillman, Transportation Manager gave a presentation regarding Class IV
Separated Bike Lanes, what they are, where they exist now and what the future
locations are anticipated to be. He also discussed resident concerns.
Commissioner Carter commented that the issues were with debris, branches etc. being
left in the bike lane. The parts of McClellan Road that were close to Saratoga Sunnyvale
Road had escape routes for bicyclists to get around the obstacles, but other areas had no
escape routes.
Vice Chair Ganga heard similar complaints. He also heard complaints from drivers that
the barriers were a hindrance. He cited one instance where he saw a child ride through
a gap in the separated bike lane and into vehicle traffic.
Commissioner Lindskog felt the separated bike lanes added safety, especially for
younger bicyclists. Most of the gaps in the protected bike lanes were not frequent
because of lack of space; escaping into traffic on the left was not advisable.
10
BPC 10-20-2021
10 of 56
Mr. Stillman said there were precast concrete barriers on Stevens Creek Boulevard that
were about eight feet long with a gap of about two feet; he wondered if the two-foot
gap was an acceptable enough gap. If a truck were blocking the bike lane completely,
the two-foot gap could provide an escape route, although inconvenient. Commissioner
Carter thought if he had to stop, then that would be dangerous, plus he would be forced
to go into traffic, which was also dangerous.
Commissioner Lindskog suggested taking the road. Chair Eschelbeck indicated that
some bike lanes might appear narrower on one street over others. Commissioner
Lindskog commented that there was simply not enough space.
Vice Chair Ganga said the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission could look at other
alternatives and see what improvements there were, within the boundaries of safety.
Commissioner Lindskog said having the lanes be perceived as narrower was what was
wanted because it caused motorists to drive slower.
Vice Chair Ganga commented on the vertical posts. Visually, they did not look good,
but they were less expensive, and they could provide more of an escape route. Data on
traffic accidents typically pointed toward problems at the intersection, not bike lanes.
Commissioner Carter concluded that McClellan needed a class IV solution, it’s safer
now. Mr. Stillman said this was good feedback and it was a learning process. Chair
Eschelbeck noticed that the feedback tonight was more about the style used on
McClellan. He was not aware of any feedback on the newer style used at Stevens Creek;
it seemed to be more acceptable to people. He thought it was good to monitor the
Stevens Creek model.
STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS
Staff Update and Commissioner Activity Report
David Stillman, Transportation Manager had no updates except that the Transportation
Division was hiring an intern in the Safe Routes to School (SR2S) group.
Commissioner Lindskog said the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) meeting and
the Mayor’s meeting were both cancelled. He reported on the SR2S meeting.
Chair Eschelbeck said Commissioner Condamoor was scheduled to attend the SR2S
meeting next month.
11
BPC 10-20-2021
11 of 56
Commission Carter asked if ‘bikes yielding at stop signs’ was on the long-term agenda.
Commissioner Lindskog noted a new law being considered about not stopping at stop
signs when vehicles were not present.
FUTURE AGENDA SETTING
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 9:32 p.m.
SUBMITTED BY:
____________________________
David Stillman, Staff Liaison
Note: Any attachments can be found on the Cupertino Website
https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/agendas-minutes
12
BPC 10-20-2021
12 of 56
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
2021 Fall Bike Fest
Planning Meeting
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
September 15, 2021
Agenda Item #3
13
BPC 10-20-2021
13 of 56
Bike Fest 2021
•Event Details
•Event Highlights
•Family Ride Details
•Commissioner Responsibilities
14
BPC 10-20-2021
14 of 56
Saturday, September 25
9am – 1pm
Event Details
15
BPC 10-20-2021
15 of 56
9:00am: Event Start Time
10:00: Mayoral Address
Bike Challenge Announcements
10:30am: Safety Talk & Family Bike Ride
12:00 pm: Clinic
1:00 pm: Event End Time
Event Timeline
16
BPC 10-20-2021
16 of 56
•Bike Rodeo
•Bike Ride
•Blender Bike
Smoothies
•Vendors
Standard Highlights
•Bike Mechanic
•Helmet Fits
•Contests
•First Aid
•Mayoral Address
17
BPC 10-20-2021
17 of 56
•How to Lock Your Bike Clinic
•Bike Bells for Bike Rodeo Participants
•Cupertino Library
•Art and Poetry
New Highlights
18
BPC 10-20-2021
18 of 56
10:30am –Brief Safety Talk & Departure
Water and Play break at the halfway point
Chaperones:
•BPC members
•4 Volunteers
Family Bike Ride Details
19
BPC 10-20-2021
19 of 56
20
BPC 10-20-2021
20 of 56
21
BPC 10-20-2021
21 of 56
22
BPC 10-20-2021
22 of 56
•Safety Talker
•Intersection Safety
•Chaperone Roles
Details to Figure Out
23
BPC 10-20-2021
23 of 56
7:45 am: set up registration table & blender bike
8:45am: volunteer orientation
8:55am: Erik train smoothie volunteers
Gerhard train registration volunteers
9:15am: ride chaperone meeting
10:30am: safety talk & family bike ride
Week of: Erik check blender bike
Commissioner Responsibilities 9/25
24
BPC 10-20-2021
24 of 56
•Take Signed Waivers & Stamp Hand for
Rodeo and Ride
•Hand Out Route Maps
•Send Folks to WBC Booth for Helmet Check
Registration Table
25
BPC 10-20-2021
25 of 56
•Bike Blender Check
•BPC Chaperones
•Ride Coordination Date
•How to Lock Your Bike Clinic: BPC or SR2S
Feedback Needed
26
BPC 10-20-2021
26 of 56
Thank you!
See you on September 25th
27
BPC 10-20-2021
27 of 56
City of Cupertino
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Public Works –Transportation Division
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
September 15, 2021
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
September 15, 2021
Agenda Item #4
28
BPC 10-20-2021
28 of 56
Vision Zero
What is Vision Zero?
•Strategy to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries,
while
•Increasing safe, healthy, equitable mobility for all
Strategies:
•Building collaboration among stakeholders
•Collecting and analyzing data
•Prioritizing equity and community engagement
•Managing speeds
•Setting timelines 29
BPC 10-20-2021
29 of 56
Vision Zero
Work Plan proposal:
•Develop policies to guide Cupertino’s Vision Zero
Program
•Develop Action Plan to achieve Vision Zero goals,
incorporating strategies
•Ensure school areas receive attention
30
BPC 10-20-2021
30 of 56
Vision Zero
Action Plan:
•Living document
•Two key components: Foundational Elements and
Actionable Strategies
•Foundational Elements:
•Baseline best practices
•Actional Strategies:
•Robust community engagement
•Equity priority
31
BPC 10-20-2021
31 of 56
Vision Zero
Foundational Elements:
•Build a Robust Data Framework
•Collect crash data prior to creating Action Plan
•Are crashes more likely at certain times and
locations?
•Are some demographics over-represented?
•What crash factors are prominent?
•Set Measurable Goals with Implementation Timeline
•Identify “reach zero year” as baseline, along with
interim goals
•What is success? What are measures of success?
•Whose responsibility to achieve goals?
•What are conditions and limitations for success?32
BPC 10-20-2021
32 of 56
Vision Zero
Foundational Elements (cont):
•Be Accountable:
•Identify lead agency responsible, partners, budget
needs
•Are strategies funded?
•Is training for staff or others needed?
•Ensure Transparency
•Maintain Vision Zero website
•Meet routinely with Task Force and residents
•Report progress to stakeholders and decision makers
33
BPC 10-20-2021
33 of 56
Vision Zero
Actionable Strategies:
•Prioritize Roadway Design:
•Design for slower, safer speeds, especially locations of
serious injuries
•Focus on Speed Management
•Employ specific strategies to lower speeds
•Utilize Impactful Educational Strategies
•Use data and research to identify most effective
strategies
•Expand SR2S program
•Develop Vision Zero training manual
•Ensure Enforcement is Equitable 34
BPC 10-20-2021
34 of 56
Vision Zero
35
BPC 10-20-2021
35 of 56
Bicycle & Pedestrian Commission
Shared Micromobility
Pilot Program
Chris Corrao
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
September 15, 2021
Agenda Item #5
36
BPC 10-20-2021
36 of 56
Shared Micromobility
What is it?
Why now?
What’s the
plan?
Measuring
Success
37
BPC 10-20-2021
37 of 56
What is Shared Micromobility?
•Transportation devices available
to the public.
•Includes: scooters, bicycles, and
more.
•Devices:
•travel freely all day,
•are charged at night
•Re-staged in the morning.
38
BPC 10-20-2021
38 of 56
Why Now?
•Outdoor and COVID friendly.
•Climate emergency.
•Vendors engaging with cities now.
•America is falling in love with
micromobility.
39
BPC 10-20-2021
39 of 56
Rapid Growth of Micromobility
40
BPC 10-20-2021
40 of 56
In a 2019 survey of 7 cities, 45% of those using shared
micromobility (bikes & scooters) said they would have
completed their trips using a personal vehicle or rideshare
vehicle if the bike/scooter was not available.*
Shared Micromobility Is Replacing Car Trips
NACTO Bike Share & Shared Mobility Initiative Report
https://nacto.org/shared-micromobility-2018 41
BPC 10-20-2021
41 of 56
What’s The Plan?
•16-month pilot program (1 vendor)
•To include scooters, bikes, etc.
•If successful, create a permanent program.
42
BPC 10-20-2021
42 of 56
Measuring Success
•Rider & Community Survey
•Key Performance Indicators
•Overall environmental assessment:
•Total miles travelled
•Miles replacing vehicle trips (vs walk/bike trips)
•Embodied environmental impacts of devices
43
BPC 10-20-2021
43 of 56
Next Steps
•Solicit feedback from bike/ped commission
•Launch “Engage Cupertino” & community outreach
•Outreach to vendors to gauge interest
•Design a 16-month pilot program with one vendor
•City Council
44
BPC 10-20-2021
44 of 56
City of Cupertino
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Public Works –Transportation Division
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
September 15, 2021
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
September 15, 2021
Agenda Item #6
45
BPC 10-20-2021
45 of 56
Bicycle & Pedestrian Commission
Shared Micromobility
Pilot Program
Chris Corrao
46
BPC 10-20-2021
46 of 56
Class IV Separated Bike Lanes
Cupertino Locations – Existing:
•Stevens Creek Blvd, Wolfe Rd –Tantau Ave
•McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr, Imperial Ave –Torre Ave
•Bubb Road, Stevens Creek Blvd –Results Way
Cupertino Locations - Future:
•Stevens Creek Blvd –Wolfe Rd –Foothill Blvd
•Mary Ave – Stevens Creek Blvd –Meteor Dr
•Blaney Ave – Homestead Ave –Bollinger Rd
47
BPC 10-20-2021
47 of 56
Class IV Separated Bike Lanes
Concerns Raised:
•Vehicle Lanes Too Narrow (Perception Only)
•Lack of Visibility
•Conflicts with Driveway Ingress/Egress
•On-street Parking Prohibited
•Right-turn hook conflicts
•Emergency Vehicle Access
•Blockage of lanes from construction/slow
bikes/debris
48
BPC 10-20-2021
48 of 56
Class IV Separated Bike Lanes
49
BPC 10-20-2021
49 of 56
Class IV Separated Bike Lanes
50
BPC 10-20-2021
50 of 56
Class IV Separated Bike Lanes
51
BPC 10-20-2021
51 of 56
Class IV Separated Bike Lanes
52
BPC 10-20-2021
52 of 56
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
21-9975 Agenda Date:
10/20/2021 Agenda #: 2.
Subject: Future Agenda Items (Eschelbeck)
Develop and Maintain a List of Future Agenda Items for the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 10/13/2021Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™53
BPC 10-20-2021
53 of 56
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
21-9976 Agenda Date:
10/20/2021 Agenda #: 3.
Subject: City of Sunnyvale Vision Zero Program (Tsang)
Receive Presentation on the City of Sunnyvale's Vision Zero Program
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 10/13/2021Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™54
BPC 10-20-2021
54 of 56
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
21-9977 Agenda Date:
10/20/2021 Agenda #: 4.
Subject: City of San Jose Vision Zero Program (Mintz-Roth)
Receive Presentation on the City of San Jose's Vision Zero Program
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 10/13/2021Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™55
BPC 10-20-2021
55 of 56
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
21-9978 Agenda Date:
10/20/2021 Agenda #: 5.
Subject: Staff Update and Commissioner Activity Report (All)
Receive Updates from Staff and Commissioners Regarding Recent Activities
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 10/13/2021Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™56
BPC 10-20-2021
56 of 56