Loading...
04-21-2021 Final BPC PacketCITY OF CUPERTINO BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION AGENDA This will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location. Wednesday, April 21, 2021 7:00 PM TELECONFERENCE / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION TO HELP STOP THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 In accordance with Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No-29-20, this will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location to help stop the spread of COVID-19. TELECONFERENCE / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION TO HELP STOP THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 In accordance with Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No-29-20, this will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location to help stop the spread of COVID-19. Members of the public wishing comment on an item on the agenda may do so in the following ways: 1) E-mail comments by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 21 to the Commission at bikepedcommission@cupertino.org. These e-mail comments will be received by the commission members before the meeting and posted to the City’s website after the meeting. 2) E-mail comments during the times for public comment during the meeting to the Commission at bikepedcommission@cupertino.org. The staff liaison will read the emails into the record, and display any attachments on the screen, for up to 3 minutes (subject to the Chair’s discretion to shorten time for public comments). Members of the public that wish to share a document must email bikepedcommission@cupertino.org prior to speaking. 3) Teleconferencing Instructions Members of the public may observe the teleconference meeting or provide oral public comments as follows: Oral public comments will be accepted during the teleconference meeting. Comments may be made during “oral communications” for matters not on the agenda, and during the public comment period for each agenda item. Page 1 CUPERTINO Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda April 21, 2021 To address the Commission, click on the link below to register in advance and access the meeting: Online Register in advance for this webinar: https://cityofcupertino.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_nYna1oPJQfeMORBTNnpFuQ Phone Dial 669 900 6833 and enter Webinar ID: 960 5777 6189 (Type *9 to raise hand to speak) Unregistered participants will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number. Or an H.323/SIP room system: H.323: 162.255.37.11 (US West) 162.255.36.11 (US East) 213.19.144.110 (Amsterdam Netherlands) 213.244.140.110 (Germany) 103.122.166.55 (Australia) 69.174.57.160 (Canada) Meeting ID: 960 5777 6189 SIP: 96057776189@zoomcrc.com After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. Please read the following instructions carefully: 1. You can directly download the teleconference software or connect to the meeting in your internet browser. If you are using your browser, make sure you are using a current and up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers, including Internet Explorer. 2. You will be asked to enter an email address and a name, followed by an email with instructions on how to connect to the meeting. Your email address will not be disclosed to the public. If you wish to make an oral public comment but do not wish to provide your name, you may enter “Cupertino Resident” or similar designation. 3. When the Chair calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on “raise hand.” Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. 4. When called, please limit your remarks to the time allotted and the specific agenda Page 2 Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda April 21, 2021 topic. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this teleconference meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.Subject: March 17, 2021 Minutes Recommended Action: March 17, 2021 Minutes A - Draft Minutes POSTPONEMENTS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission and not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect to a matter not on the agenda. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS OLD BUSINESS 2.Subject: Future Agenda Items (Eschelbeck) Recommended Action: Develop and Maintain List of Future Agenda Items for the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission NEW BUSINESS 3.Subject: Review of FY2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects (Michael) Recommended Action: Receive Report and Provide Input on FY2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 4.Subject: E-bike Operations in Cupertino (Eschelbeck) Recommended Action: Discussion on E-bike Operations in Cupertino Page 3 Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda April 21, 2021 STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS 5.Subject: Staff Update and Commissioner Activity Report (All) Recommended Action: Receive Updates from Staff and Commissioners Regarding Recent Activities FUTURE AGENDA SETTING ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this teleconference meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members after publication of the agenda will be made available for public inspection. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office in City Hall located at 10300 Torre Avenue during normal business hours. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. You are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights you may have on the information provided to the City. Members of the public are entitled to address the members concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the members on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment. Page 4 DRAFT MINUTES MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION March 17, 2021 Draft Minutes The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Gerhard Eschelbeck, Ilango Ganga, Erik Lindskog, Jack Carter, Maanya Condamoor Absent: None Staff: David Stillman, Staff Liaison Others Present: Roger Lee, Director of Public Works. Pranav Bollineni, Cupertino High School Junior. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item 1: February 17, 2021 Minutes Vice Chair Ganga motioned to approve; Commissioner Lindskog seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0. POSTPONEMENTS No postponements ORAL COMMUNICATIONS No oral communications WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS No written communications OLD BUSINESS Item 2: Future Agenda Items (Eschelbeck) Carmen Road Bridge McClellan Separated Bikeway Phase 3 Public places for bike racks Commission review and make recommendations on Capital Improvement Projects E-bikes Education on how to use two-stage left turn boxes Path between Lincoln Elementary and Monta Vista High School Next steps for Commission Work Plan Item Vice Chair Ganga requested that the Future Agenda Items be posted on the Commission website. David Stillman, Transportation Manager reported that he will confer with the City Clerk and recommend an approach that is consistent with other commissions. Item 3: Cupertino Crash Data Analysis (Ganga) Vice Chair Ganga reported that Pranav Bollineni updated the data based on feedback received from the commission. Pranav Bollineni followed with his presentation, which is included with these minutes. Commissioners Carter and Condamoor, and David Stillman, Transportation Manager suggested that accident data be normalized by length of roadway or volume of traffic to allow comparison of risk among different roadways. Chair Eschelbeck inquired if there was a way to follow accident trends in real time. Vice Chair Ganga described a City of San Jose Vision Zero Program which incorporated a Geographic Information System (GIS) map on their website that is updated with San Jose Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) accident data, allowing “before and after” trends to be evaluated. NEW BUSINESS Item 4: 2018 Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan Project Review (Stillman) David Stillman, Transportation Manager presented an update on the status of projects within the 2018 Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan (Plan). The presentation is included with these minutes. Commissioner Condamoor asked for an explanation of the project scoring, and if the intention was to adopt all projects contained within the Plan when the Plan was approved. Mr. Stillman explained that it could take up to 20 years to complete the largest projects, though progress on many projects would be made within five years of Plan’s adoption. Pedestrian Plans are generally updated every five years. Mr. Stillman also stated that many factors went into the project scoring, based mostly on need. In response to discussions related to the Carmen Road Bridge, Vice Chair Ganga noted that the commission has a responsibility to make recommendations to the Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Budget. He requested that the proposed CIP Budget be brought to the commission to allow the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission (BPC) to make recommendations before the May 4, 2021 Council Study Session. Vice Chair Ganga inquired whether staff will be requesting funding for any new projects from the Pedestrian Plan in the upcoming CIP Budget cycle. Mr. Stillman responded that staff will likely be recommending funding for the Stelling Road/Alves Drive crosswalk relocation. Item 5: Stevens Creek Blvd Separated Bikeway Project (Stillman) David Stillman, Transportation Manager gave a presentation with an update of the Stevens Creek Boulevard Separated Bikeway Project and a description of the new signal phasing at Stevens Creek Boulevard/Wolfe Road. The presentation is included with these minutes. Mr. Stillman explained that staff will be exploring a variety of funding sources for construction of Phase 2, including grants and private donations. Chair Eschelbeck suggested that staff consider lowering the bicycle signal heads. Vice Chair Ganga suggested integrating vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian counts into the project. STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS Item 6: Staff Update and Commissioner Activity Report (All) David Stillman, Transportation Manager reported that the award of the design contract for Phase 3 of the McClellan Road Separated Bike Lane Project (the De Anza/McClellan intersection) was approved by City Council at their March 16, 2021 meeting. Commissioner Lindskog gave an update of the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) meeting. The presentation is included with these minutes. Chair Eschelbeck provided an update on the March Safe Routes to School Working Group meeting and the March Mayor’s meeting. Both updates are included with these minutes. Vice Chair Ganga reported that work is continuing to find a way with the City’s guidance to continue the joint Bicycle Pedestrian Commission (BPC)/Technology, Information & Communications Commission (TICC) Subcommittee. Vice Chair Ganga reported on his attendance at the last City Council meeting when the proposed City Work Plan was presented. He noted that (1) the Safety Around Schools item as recommended by the BPC is being combined with the Vision Zero recommendation; (2) The Traffic Garden item was presented as a BPC recommendation, which it was not, and (3) the public and some Council Members requested more detail about Vision Zero. He is hopeful more information will be presented by staff at the March 30, 2021 Council Study Session. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. SUBMITTED BY: ____________________________ David Stillman, Staff Liaison Cupertino Traffic Collision Data Analysis Pranav Bollineni Oct 2020 -Jan 2021 Junior @ Cupertino High School Agenda Item #3 Changes ●Added Time of Day ●Added Seasonality ●Added Collision Factor ●Focused More On Bike/Ped ●Added Vehicle Type at Fault Background ●The Smart City pilot project’s aims to make the city safer with new technology. ●The Commision wants data on which streets are more susceptible to accidents and what vehicles were involved. ●This data should be easily understandable through visualization. The Project Goals ●The Commission requires Collision data from the past 5 years. ●This data must be in the form of a map and display the collision type. ●The types of collisions are: motorcycles, vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. Methodology Data Retrieval Using the Santa Clara County SWITRS website, the raw data is retrieved as CSV file along with meta information about data. Data Processing Using Java and Python programming, unnecessary data was cleaned up to make the map visuals relevant. Data Visualization Using Google maps, the data was applied in the map format for easier human interpretation. Data Analysis From the maps, data was interpreted and some conclusions were derived (in the following slides). Pedestrian Collisions Map 2015-2020 Bicycle Collisions Map 2015-2020 What Classifies An Injury? Fatal Injury:Results in death within 30 days after the crash occurred. Suspected Serious Injury (Severe Injury): Severe laceration exposing underlying tissues/muscles/organs or resulting in significant loss of blood. Broken or distorted extremity (arm or leg) Crush Injuries Suspected skull, chest or abdominal injury other than bruises or minor lacerations Significant burns (second and third degree burns over 10% or more of body) Unconsciousness when taken from crash scene Paralysis Suspected Minor Injury (Visible Injury): Minor injury is any injury evident at the scene, other than fatal or serious injuries. Ex: Lump on head, abrasions, bruises, minor lacerations. Possible Injury (Reported Pain): Any injury reported or claimed, not fatal, not suspected serious, or suspected minor. Ex: Possible injuries reported or indicated by behavior but not readily evident. Cupertino Pedestrian Collisions by Street Street Name Crashes Stevens Creek Boulevard 14 De Anza Boulevard 13 Stelling Road 6 Homestead Road 5 Finch Avenue 3 McClellan Road 3 Bollinger Road 2 Table 6. Most frequent pedestrian collisions by primary street Cupertino Bicycle Collisions by Street ●Most crashes occur on major streets Street Name Crashes Stevens Creek Boulevard 37 De Anza Boulevard 24 Homestead Road 19 Stelling Road 10 McClellan Road 10 Tantau Avenue 8 Bicycle Collision Data Year Total Bicycle Collisions 1 Injury per incident 2 Injuries per incident 2015 11 11 0 2016 15 15 0 2017 15 15 0 2018 17 15 2 2019 8 8 0 2020 4 4 0 Total 70 68 2 No fatalities recorded in this data grouping. Pedestrian Collision Data Year Total Pedestrian Incidents 1 Injury per incident 2 Injuries per incident 2015 13 2 11 2016 18 0 18 2017 23 2 21 2018 11 0 11 2019 9 2 7 2020 2 0 2 Total 76 6 70 2 Fatalities recorded in this data grouping Bicycle Collision Data: Percentages Type Of Collision Number of Collisions Percentage of Total Collisions Head-On 1 3.23% Sideswipe 2 1.82% Rear End 3 0.59% Broadside 10 5.62% Hit Object 5 4.59% Overturned 6 17.14% Vehicle/Pedestrian 2 2.30% Other*40 39.60% * Type not listed Pedestrian Collisions Data: Percentages Type Of Incident Number of Incidents Percentage of Total Incidents Head-On 0 0% Sideswipe 0 0% Rear End 0 0% Broadside 0 0% Hit Object 0 0% Overturned 0 0% Vehicle/Pedestrian 20 95.24 Other*1 4.76% * Type not listed Vehicle Type at Fault: Pedestrian Primary Collision Factor Total Accidents Passenger Car 37 Pickup Truck 3 Bus 2 Bicycle 1 Pedestrian 16 Vehicle Type at Fault: Bicycle Primary Collision Factor Total Accidents Passenger Car 99 Pickup Truck 6 Truck 2 School Bus 1 Bus 2 Bicycle 79 Collision Factor: Pedestrian Primary Collision Factor Total Accidents (Vehicle) Code Violation 74 Unknown 1 Collision Factor: Bicycle Primary Collision Factor Total Accidents (Vehicle) Code Violation 175 Other Improper Driving 1 Unknown 3 Seasonality: Pedestrian Season Total Accidents Spring 15 Summer 13 Fall 20 Winter 27 Seasonality: Pedestrian Winter Months Accidents December 8 January 13 February 6 Total 27 Spring Months Accidents March 9 April 3 May 3 Total 15 Summer Months Accidents June 6 July 4 August 3 Total 13 Fall Months Accidents September 9 October 5 November 6 Total 20 Seasonality: Bicycle Season Total Accidents Spring 42 Summer 52 Fall 56 Winter 29 Seasonality: Bicycle Winter Months Accidents December 7 January 12 February 10 Total 29 Spring Months Accidents March 12 April 9 May 21 Total 42 Summer Months Accidents June 13 July 8 August 31 Total 52 Fall Months Accidents September 32 October 13 November 11 Total 56 Time of Day: Pedestrian Time Total Accidents 7 PM-6 AM 61 6 AM-7 PM 14 Time of Day: Bicycle Time Total Accidents 7 PM-6 AM 26 6 AM-7 PM 179 Highest Collisions By Location ●Intersections ○Stevens Creek(63) ○De Anza(45) ○Homestead(19) ○Wolfe(16) ○Bollinger(12) ●Streets ○Stevens Creek(142) ○De Anza(111), ○Homestead(55), ○Stelling(40), ○Wolfe(38), ○Bollinger(27) ●Highways ○I280S/B(126) ○I280N/B(98) Conclusions ●The three corridors with the highest number of reported collisions (Bicycles and Pedestrian) were ○Stevens Creek Boulevard (51) ○De Anza Boulevard (37) ○Homestead Road (24) ●Stevens Creek and De Anza Boulevard both have higher volumes of auto traffic and vehicle speeds since they are larger main roads ●Stelling Road is also a major corridor through Cupertino and prone to higher incidents (16) High Risk Corridors from the Previous Master Plan Conclusions from This Analysis Next Steps ●Sort by demographic ●Summary on what was requested and what was done References ●Santa Clara County Police Dept. ●SWITRS Website ●2016 Bike Transportation Plan ●2018 Pedestrian Transportation Plan #Project Location Start End Score Status/Notes 1 Sidewalk McClellan Road San Leandro Ave Orange Ave 80 Complete 2 Sidewalk McClellan Road Bonny Dr McClellan Pl 80 Complete 3 Grade Separated Crossing SR 85 Overcrossing Grand Ave Mary Ave 75 4 Sidewalk McClellan Road SR 85 overcrossing Rose Blossom Dr 75 Complete 5 Sidewalk Orange Ave Granada Ave Alcazar Ave 75 Design underway. Construction 2022. 6 Crosswalk Stelling Road Alves Dr 75 7 Shorten Turn Lane Stevens Creek Blvd Oaks Shopping Center Entrance 75 Westport to complete 8 Add Right-Turn Phase Stevens Creek Blvd SR 85 NB On-ramp 75 Westport to complete 9 Shorten Turn Lane Stevens Creek Blvd De Anza College West Entrance 75 Westport to complete 10 Sidewalk Byrne Ave McClellan Rd Granada Ave 70 Complete 11 Grade Separated Crossing Carmen Road Stevens Creek Blvd south side Stevens Creek Blvd north side 70 Feasibility Study complete. No funding for future phases. 12 Sidewalk Foothill Blvd (east side)Stevens Creek Blvd Rancho Ventura St 70 13 Sidewalk Foothill Blvd (west side)Stevens Creek Blvd Rancho Ventura St 70 14 Shared-use Path Junipero Serra Trail Mary Ave Vallco Parkway 70 Design of east and central segments in progress. 15 Class 1 Path Mary Ave Don Burnett Bridge Stevens Creek Blvd 70 Separeted bikeway in progress 16 Sidewalk Mary Ave Dog Park Oaks Shopping Center 70 17 Bike/Ped Bridge McClellan Road at Stevens Creek 70 18 Shared-use Path Regnart Creek Trail Pacifica Dr E. Estates Dr 70 Construction in progress. Anticipated completion end of 2021 19 Sidewalk Stelling Road Catalano Ct Orion Ct 70 20 Class 1 Path Oaks Shopping Center Mary Ave Stevens Creek Blvd 70 Westport to complete Class III 21 Grade Separated Crossing Linda Vista Trail at McClellan Rd 65 22 Install Curb Extensions Stevens Creek Blvd at Phar Lap Dr 65 Design complete. No funding for construction. May use posts 23 Bike/Ped Bridge and Sidewalk UPRR/Stevens Creek Blvd UPRR Foothill Blvd 65 24 Sidewalk Bubb Rd Edward Wy Krzich Pl 60 25 Reconfigure Intersection De Anza Blvd at McClellan Rd 60 Design contract awarded by Council 26 Install Curb Extensions Phil Ln at Finch Ave 60 27 Reconfigure Intersection Torre Ave at Town Center Ln 60 28 Shared-use Path Union Pacific RR north of Stevens Creek Blvd South City limit 60 Project shelved 29 Shared-use Path West side Vallco Property Junipero Serra Trail Stevens Creek Blvd 60 Project shelved 30 Sidewalk Foothill Blvd (east side)Rancho Ventura St Walnut Cir 55 31 Shared-use Path Linda Vista Trail and Stevens Creek Trail McClellan Ranch Stevens Creek County Park 55 Linda Vista Trail construction in progress. Anticipated completion May 2021 32 Sidewalk Blackberry Farm Entrance Road Bynre Ave Blackberry Farm 55 Feasibility Study complete. No funding for future phases. 33 Shared-use Path Wilson Park Portal Ave Rodrigues Ave 55 34 Stop sign Alves Dr At Saich Way 45 35 Install Curb Extensions Bandley Dr at Mariani Ave (SE corner)45 Design complete. No funding for construction. May use posts 36 Bike/Ped Connection Imperial Ave Alcadar Ave Almaden Ave 45 37 Install Curb Extensions and High Vis Crosswalk Rainbow Dr at Gardenside Ln 45 Completed with flexible posts 38 Shared-use Path Saratoga Creek Barnhard-Sterling Park Stevens Creek Blvd 40 Parcel acquired 39 Stop sign Alves Dr at Beardon Dr 35 40 Install Curb Extensions Bandley Dr at Alves (south leg)35 41 Sidewalk Beardon Dr Alves Dr Valley Green Dr 35 42 Sidewalk Alcalde Rd Footill Blvd Avenida Ln 30 43 Install Curb Extensions, High-Vis Crosswalk and consider stop sign Bandley Dr at Lazaneo Dr 30 High-vis crosswalk with RRFB installed 44 Install RRFB Valley Green Dr at Bandley Dr (west leg)30 Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Agenda Item #4 51.CfadClrd. (;llll'll_ft'-,,1rt -�.,,, .. -. a: 0: J�lj11 1•1 £ ,.,. .. • • Ma Elements Priority Projects Land Use • Spots Segments 0 0.25 0.5 -- Apple Campus Civic School Park Commercial 1 Miles N A p Project Update City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Class IV Bikeway Public Works –Transportation Division David Stillman, Transportation Manager Agenda Item #5 Stevens Creek Blvd Class IV Bikeway Stevens Creek Class IV Bikeway •Phase 1 Tantau to Wolfe, Phase 2 Wolfe to Highway 85 •Precast concrete buffer islands installed along bike lane •Separate protected signal phasing for bicycles at Wolfe (westbound) and Finch (eastbound) Stevens Creek Class IV Bikeway -Status •Phase 1: •Apple donation $1.8 million •Project substantially complete •Phase 2: •Design fully funded •Design efforts have begun, will continue through summer •No funding or timeline identified for construction phase. Staff researching grant opportunities. May construct in phases Stevens Creek Class IV Bikeway –Phase 1 Stevens Creek Class IV Bikeway –Phase 1 VTA BPAC Report For March 10, 2021 VTA BPAC meeting Erik Lindskog Agenda Item #6 Main items to report on •Public comment •Santa Clara County Staff Report •Mt. Diablo bike improvements •Transportation Systems Monitoring Program Report •Central Bikeway Study –Alignment options •Announcements Public comment •Roland LeBrun –Commented on that the costs for the BART extensions has become very expensive. Total cost now $5.25B. Santa Clara County Staff Report •Measure B planning grant application planned for foothill expressway. •Another project on foothill, widening, almost complete, complete in May 2021. •Q: What is the state of bike lanes? Will shoulders be converted to Bike lanes? A: Will study. Maybe have separated bikeway Mt. Diablo Bike Improvements •Had 23 collisions per year on the road up/down Mount Diablo. •Unsafe passing •Too close •Passing in blind curves causing collisions with bicyclists going down the mountain. •Added bike lanes on the side of the road going uphill, at places. •Facilitates cars to passing bikes. •Collisions reduced to 1 in the past two years Transportation Systems Monitoring Program Report •Presentation of various metrics of the roads and their usage in Santa Clara County, including some collision statistics. •See VTA agenda packet for March 10 meeting: •http://santaclaravta.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=3217&Inli ne=True Central Bikeway Study – Alignment options Alignment options •The Walsh Wizard •The Trail Trackway •The Shortliner Can combine segments from the different options. Announcements •Bike -To -Work -Day or Bike-To -Wherever-Day •See Silicon Valley Bike Coalition’s webpage: •ttps://bikesiliconvalley.org/btwd/ •May 21 (Nationally). •May -Bike to wherever month (locally). •Need to sign up before the end of April if we want to run an energizer station. •May be better to have, say, at mid-day, on a suitable day as people does not necessarily bike to work. Summary from the Safe Routes 2 School Meeting March 10, 2021 * David Stillman provided an update and information on the recently implemented protected bicycle path along Stevens Creek Blvd from Tantau to Wolfe. In particular, he highlighted the use of technology to coordinate and control traffic lights to provide a safe crossing for bicyclists. The automatic detection of bicyclists combined with dedicated bicycle light makes it a new approach within the city of Cupertino. * Lauren Freeman from the Outride Foundation provided an overview of their organization, and some of their programs. The Outride Foundation is a 501c3 and was created by the founder of Specialized. They are providing grants to bicycling related programs - at the meeting they were sharing about their Bike Education Program for Middle Schools, which is in use by some of the middle schools in the bay area including Sunnyvale. Agenda Item #6