Loading...
03-17-2021 Final BPC PacketCITY OF CUPERTINO BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION AGENDA This will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location Wednesday, March 17, 2021 7:00 PM Teleconference Meeting TELECONFERENCE / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION TO HELP STOP THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 In accordance with Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No-29-20, this will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location to help stop the spread of COVID-19. Members of the public wishing comment on an item on the agenda may do so in the following ways: 1) E-mail comments by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 17, 2021 the Commission at bikepedcommission@cupertino.org. These e-mail comments will be received by the commission members before the meeting and posted to the City’s website after the meeting. 2) E-mail comments during the times for public comment during the meeting to the Commission at bikepedcommission@cupertino.org. The staff liaison will read the emails into the record, and display any attachments on the screen, for up to 3 minutes (subject to the Chair’s discretion to shorten time for public comments). Members of the public that wish to share a document must email bikepedcommission@cupertino.org prior to speaking. 3) Teleconferencing Instructions Members of the public may observe the teleconference meeting or provide oral public comments as follows: Oral public comments will be accepted during the teleconference meeting. Comments may be made during “oral communications” for matters not on the agenda, and during the public comment period for each agenda item. To address the Commission, click on the link below to register in advance and access the meeting: Page 1 1 Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda March 17, 2021 Online Register in advance for this webinar: https://cityofcupertino.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_FB76hShqTLCxwDiRwuXY5w Phone Dial 669 900 6833 and enter Webinar ID: 992 9701 3538 (Type *9 to raise hand to speak) Unregistered participants will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number. Or an H.323/SIP room system: H.323: 162.255.37.11 (US West) 162.255.36.11 (US East) 213.19.144.110 (Amsterdam Netherlands) 213.244.140.110 (Germany) 103.122.166.55 (Australia) 69.174.57.160 (Canada) Meeting ID: 992 9701 3538 SIP: 99297013538@zoomcrc.com After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. Please read the following instructions carefully: 1. You can directly download the teleconference software or connect to the meeting in your internet browser. If you are using your browser, make sure you are using a current and up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers, including Internet Explorer. 2. You will be asked to enter an email address and a name, followed by an email with instructions on how to connect to the meeting. Your email address will not be disclosed to the public. If you wish to make an oral public comment but do not wish to provide your name, you may enter “Cupertino Resident” or similar designation. 3. When the Chair calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on “raise hand.” Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. 4. When called, please limit your remarks to the time allotted and the specific agenda topic. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to Page 2 2 Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda March 17, 2021 attend this teleconference meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.Subject: February 17, 2021 minutes Recommended Action: February 17, 2021 minutes A - Draft Minutes POSTPONEMENTS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission and not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect to a matter not on the agenda. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS OLD BUSINESS 2.Subject: Future Agenda Items (Eschelbeck) Recommended Action: Develop and Maintain List of Future Agenda Items for the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission 3.Subject: Cupertino Crash Data Analysis (Ganga) Recommended Action: Receive Follow-up Report on Crash Data in Cupertino between 2010 and 2014 NEW BUSINESS 4.Subject: 2018 Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan Project Review (Stillman) Recommended Action: Review Status of Projects Within the 2018 Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan 5.Subject: Stevens Creek Boulevard Separated Bikeway Project (Stillman) Recommended Action: Receive Report on Stevens Creek Boulevard Separated Bikeway Project Page 3 3 Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda March 17, 2021 STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS 6.Subject: Staff Update and Commissioner Activity Report (All) Recommended Action: Receive Updates from Staff and Commissioners Regarding Recent Activities FUTURE AGENDA SETTING ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this teleconference meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members after publication of the agenda will be made available for public inspection. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office in City Hall located at 10300 Torre Avenue during normal business hours. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. You are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights you may have on the information provided to the City. Members of the public are entitled to address the members concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the members on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment. Page 4 4 DRAFT MINUTES MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION February 17, 2021 Draft Minutes The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Gerhard Eschelbeck, Erik Lindskog, Ilango Ganga, Jack Carter, Maanya Condamoor Absent: None Staff: David Stillman, Staff Liaison Others Present: Roger Lee, Director of Public Works. Dianne Thompson, Assistant City Manager. Kirsten Squarcia, City Clerk 1. Oath of Office for Newly-Appointed Commission Members; Training on Commissioner Handbook Approved by City Council on January 19, 2021 (Squarcia) Kirsten Squarcia, City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Commissioners Ganga, Carter and Condamoor. She continued with her presentation, summarizing the highlights of the Commissioner Handbook approved by the City Council on January 19, 2021. The presentation is included in these minutes. David Stillman, Transportation Manager provided a summary of protocols relating to commissioner communication and interactions with staff and members of other commissions. Muni Madhdhipatla spoke to congratulate new commissioners on their appointment and to express appreciation for the remaining commissioners, including staff. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2. Approval of January 20, 2021 Minutes Commissioner Ganga motioned to approve, Commissioner Lindskog seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0. POSTPONEMENTS No postponements CUPERTINO 5 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Byron Rovegno requested a future agenda item be considered regarding public places for bike racks. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Two written communications were received and included in these minutes. OLD BUSINESS 3. Future Agenda Items (Eschelbeck) Carmen Road Bridge Stevens Creek Boulevard Class IV McClellan Separated Bikeway Phase 3 Public places for bike racks Crash data analysis follow-up Commission review and recommendations on Capital Improvement Projects Review of projects within Pedestrian Transportation Plan E-bikes NEW BUSINESS 4. Election of Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Chair and Vice Chair for 2021 (Eschelbeck) Commissioner Lindskog nominated himself as Chair. Commissioner Condamoor seconded the motion. Commissioner Ganga presented a substitute motion to nominate Chair Eschelbeck as Chair. Commissioner Carter seconded the substitute motion. Substitute motion passed 4-1, with Commissioner Lindskog voting against. Commissioner Lindskog motioned to nominate himself as Vice Chair. Commissioner Condamoor seconded the motion. Chair Eschelbeck presented substitute motion to nominate Commissioner Ganga as Vice Chair. Commissioner Carter seconded the substitute motion. Substitute motion passed 3-2, with Commissioners Lindskog and Condamoor voting against. 5. Safe Routes to School Working Group Coordination (Eschelbeck) Commissioner Lindskog voted to have a rotating attendance of Bicycle Pedestrian Commissioners at the monthly Safe Routes to School Working Group meetings. Chair Eschelbeck amended the motion, adding that the rotation schedule will mimic the Mayor’s meeting rotation schedule. Commissioner Lindskog seconded the amended motion. Motion as amended passed 5-0. 6 STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS 6. Staff Report (Stillman) David Stillman, Transportation Manager reported that discussions were underway to begin the design phase for Phase 2 of the Stevens Creek Boulevard Class IV Bikeway Project, which will extend from Wolfe Road to Highway 85. Project Scope is currently being defined, which will be immediately followed by a consultant selection. Mr. Stillman reported that Redwood Construction has been issued the Notice to Proceed for the Regnart Creek Trail project. Initial biological surveys have been completed. Staff continues to reach out to fencing contractors to solicit quotes for privacy fencing work. Mr. Stillman reported that the design contract for Phase 3 of the McClellan Separated Bikeway Project at the intersection of De Anza/McClellan is being negotiated with Kimley-Horn. Mr. Stillman reported that the Tier 1 work orders for the School Walk Audit Project have been issued, and City crews are in the process of completing that work. Staff is in the process of coordinating Tier 2 items. Staff expects construction on Tier 2 items to begin within the month. Tier 3 coordination will begin once Tier 2 coordination is complete. Staff expects to complete all Walk Audit work by the end of 2022, assuming the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions have lifted enough to allow for traffic studies, which are required for some of the projects. Mr. Stillman reported that the webpage and survey for the Bollinger Road Corridor Safety Study Project is now live. The survey closes February 26, 2021. Website is www.cupertino.org/bollingerstudy. Commissioner Lindskog inquired about the Work Plan recommendations. Mr. Stillman responded that all commissioners will be informed about which projects are being recommended to City Council once the decision has been made by Public Works. 7. VTA BPAC Report (Lindskog) Commissioner Lindskog gave a presentation summarizing the most recent Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) meeting. The presentation is included in these minutes. 8. Report on Subcommittee Assignments and General Comments Vice-Chair Ganga provided an update from the February 2021 Mayor’s meeting. Notes are included in these minutes. 7 ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 8:52 p.m. SUBMITTED BY: ____________________________ David Stillman, Staff Liaison 8 Summary of Notes from Mayor’s meeting Feb 10, 2021 Housing Commission: Connie Cunningham • Worked on City work program items • Mayor’s feedback: Create Pipeline of projects o Identify funding sources o What good projects to support, including BMR units o Any support for apply, engaging, dialog for affordable housing, inclusionary zoning o We are in good lock step - commission & council Audit Committee: Daisy Liang • Worked on City work program items Fine Arts Commission: Sudha Kasamsetty • This year’s focus: Visibility of the commission • Artist award program, more programs, accomplished artists of the area • Collaboration with Parks & Rec commission • Lots of exciting programs, incorporate in the Work plan • Bringing up festival in Cupertino, Display art work in library windows, there is a way forward Sustainability Commission: Gary Latshaw • Earth & Arbor day planning, cannot be an outdoor event • Recommend a fee on carbon, very complicated issue, will talk about it in march, may do a recommendation to the Council • Mayor will be attending the environmental day this Saturday Teen Commission: Rushil Jayant • Fiscal year program and what is done in the past year • Judge for Essay contest, submissions coming soon • How to improve life in Cupertino • Next meeting discussion on collaboration with Safe route to school program • Earth day volunteer opportunity 9 TICC commission: Mukesh Garg • Work plan recommendations for 21-22, few ideas proposed: Revisit 5G policy & guidelines, touchless cross-walk signaling, Smart cities technology to support Vision Zero recommended by BPC, IOT technology to enhance public safety, climate monitoring, water conservation • Chair & vice chair election Library Commission: Rahul Vasanth • Three new commissioners joined the commission • Progress report: In the agenda packet for o Library expansion project top priority, showed picture of artistic view of the project, virtual ground breaking scheduled for March 5th o City manager met with the foundation on the expectations o Parks & Recreation Commission: Neesha Tambe • Completed Parks & Rec Master plan last year • Next year focus is Strategic plan • Strategic plan phase: $200K annual budget for strategic plan implementation, not enough, bigger projects will need more funding o Short term implementation:  small changes to parks like benches, hydration stations, trash cans, etc.,  Commissioner visited every park to assess short term improvements needed o Bigger builds:  Play area, Basketball court, bike parking etc., • Community garden • CUSD collaboration for park space for residents use • Jollyman park all inclusive playground came to a halt Bicycle Pedestrian Commission: Ilango Ganga • Recommendations for City Work program o Vision Zero o Traffic Safety around schools o Building code assessment for onsite facilities to encourage bicycle commuting o Encourage staff to fund Stevens creek Class IV bike lanes and Carmen road bridge • Other items reviewed: Bollinger road safety study in progress, Review Cupertino crash data analysis 10 Planning Commission: Ray Wang • New commissioners joined the commission, chair vice chair election • 5G rollout review, Aesthetics guidelines, lot of complexities • Looking at RHNA numbers Public safety: Hymanand Nellore • Work plan for next year: o Strategic: Technology use for public safety  Theft of catalytic convertors  Public places o Wildlife safety: living with wildlife, Coyotes sighted in backyards o Bird safety & Dark skys o Concerns about package theft, house break-ins  Revamp neighborhood watch program, activate for these issues /End of notes/ 11 Bicycle Pedestrian Commission February 17, 2021 Commissioner’s Handbook Review Agenda Item #1 CUPERTINO 12 Commissioner’s Handbook ●Structure of Government ●Commission Purpose ●Attendance ●Public Meetings (Brown Act) ●Conflict of Interest (Political Reform Act) ●Parliamentary Procedure (Rosenberg’s Rules) ●Ethics ●City Work Program ●City Email Policy 13 City Organization Citizens of Cupertino Ci ty Counc il Committees a nd -Comm issions I I I I City Treas urer City Attorney City Ma nager's Office (Director of Administrative Internal Aud itor Services) I I I I I I Economic Sustainabi lity Community Outreach Office of Disaster Preparedness Deve lopment Prog rams and Neighborhood City Clerk Communications Watch L I I I I I La w Enforcement Administrative Community Innovation an d (Santa Cla ra County Parks a nd Recreation Pu blic Works Video Sheriffs-Contract) Services Deve lopment Technology -Finance a nd Budget -Bui lding -Recreation a nd Deve lopment Services ■ .. Capital Improvement Infra structure .. ■ GIS Education Program -Human Resources -Planning -Sports, Safety, a nd Environmental ■"" Transportat ion ■ Applications Ou tdoor Recreation Programs -Code Enforcement -Business a nd Service Center Community Services I I I ■ ■ ... Hous ing Facil it ies and Fleet Trees a nd ROW Streets Grounds 14 Council-Manager Structure of Government ●City Council sets policy and vision ●City Manager implements policy and directs day-to-day citywide administrative operations and staff ●City staff has two primary roles: 1.Develop policy alternatives/make professional recommendations 2.Implement Council direction 15 Commission Purpose,CMC Ch. 2 A. The powers and funct io ns of th e Bicycle Pedestrian Comm iss ion shall be to review , monitor and suggest recommenda tions for C ity transportat ion matters including , but not limited to , bicycle an d pedestria n tra ffic , parking , education a nd recrea t ion w ith in C u pertino . B. To fu lfi ll t hei r m ission , the Commission may involve itself in the following activi t ies: 1. To mon itor a nd update the bicycle transportation plan and pedestria n transporta tion g uidelines ; 2 To suggest recommendations, rev iew and mon itor the City 's general pla n transporta t ion e lement ; 3 . To rece ive p ublic input pertain in g to bicycle and p edestrian transportat ion and infrastructure issues; 4 . To make recommendations rega rding the implementation of roadway and transportat ion improvements as it pertains to bi cycle and pedestrian needs ; 5 . To make recommendations rega rding the allocation of funds for capit al expendi tures relating to b icycle a n d pedestrian transportation ; 6 . Any other activity that may be deemed appropriate a nd necessary . 16 Attendance •25% of regular meetings missed or three consecutive meetings missed in a calendar year results in removal •May request a waiver of this provision to Council 17 The Brown Act “All meetings of the legislative body of a local agency shall be open and public, and all persons shall be permitted to attend any meeting . . . except as otherwise provided in this chapter.” Gov’t. Code Sec. 54953(a) 3 key requirements: (1) conduct business and make decisions only in open public meetings; (2) publish and follow meeting agendas; and (3) provide an opportunity for public participation before making decisions 18 Brown Act –Meetings ●“ . . . any congregation of a majority of the members of a legislative body at the same time and location, . . . to hear, discuss, deliberate, or take action on any item that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.” ●Regular meetings ●Special meetings called by Chair or majority of commission 19 Brown Act –Action Taken ●a collective decision made by a majority ●a collective commitment or promise by a majority to make a positive or a negative decision; or ●an actual vote by a majority when sitting as a body or entity, upon a motion, proposal, resolution, order or ordinance. Gov’t. Code Sec. 54952.6 20 Brown Act –Serial Meetings ●A majority of the members of a legislative body shall not, outside a meeting . . ., use a series of communications of any kind, directly or through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate, or take action on any item of business that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body. Gov’t. Code Sec. 54952.2(b)(1) 21 Brown Act –Serial Meetings ●Daisy Chain: A to B, B to C, C to D ●Wagon Wheel: A to B, A to C, A to D ●Includes Email, Texting, Notes ●Do not “Reply All” in emails ●Limit risk by sending communications to commission liaison and not stating position outside of meetings < 22 Brown Act –Exceptions ●Individual Contacts and Staff Briefings –less than quorum ●Staff may have separate conversations or communications with members, outside of a meeting, in order to answer questions or provide information ●Staff may not communicate the comments or position of any other member of the legislative body. Gov’t. Code Sec. 54952.2(b)(2) 23 Brown Act –Exceptions ●Purely Social and Ceremonial Gatherings & Seminars ●Open, Publicized Community Meetings ●Meetings of Another Agency ●Members should not discuss City business 24 Brown Act -Agendas ●Post 72 hours before regular meeting and 24 hours before special meeting ●Scope of discussion and action is limited to agendized matters ●Brief general description of items to be discussed – to inform interested members of public of the subject matter ●May schedule future items, hear staff/commissioner announcements, have very brief clarifying questions/responses to public 25 Brown Act –Public Participation ●Public right to speak on (1) any item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission and (2) the specific items of business before or during the commission’s consideration ●Comments may be anonymous ●May impose reasonable time limits on public comment ●Cannot prohibit public criticism of policies, procedures, programs, or services of the agency or the acts or omissions of the body itself ●Public right to review communications distributed to a majority of the commission 26 Political Reform Act,Gov Code 81000 et seq. ●FPPC Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700) filing requirement ●Disclosure of personal financial interests ●Serves as a reminder in potential conflict situations ●Filed when assuming office and annually thereafter 27 Rosenberg’s Rules of Order ●Simple rules for parliamentary procedure ●How to establish order at meetings ●How motions are made ●How the chair runs the meeting 28 Rosenberg’s Rules of Order Agenda format handled by the Chair: 1)Announces the agenda item 2)Invites the staff report 3)Asks members for clarifying questions 4)Invites public comments 5)Invites a motion 6)Invites a second to the motion 7)Ensures motion is understood 8)Invites discussion/deliberation 9)Takes a vote 10)Announces the vote result 29 City Work Program ●Established by the City Council ●Guides the work of the City ●Commissions provide suggestions related to their purpose Nov/Dec 30 Ethics ●Cupertino Ethics Policy ●Elected/appointed officials and staff receive regular training on ethics as required by state law (AB 1234) ●Options to satisfy the requirement: o Online self-study o Training led by City Attorney’s Office o Annual conference or seminar 31 City Email Policy ●Commissioners assigned City email address ●Use your City email to conduct City business ●Follow “netiquette” guidance set forth in Technology Use Policy ●Do not use your personal email account for City business 32 Questions? Contact the City Clerk’s Office: Email: cityclerk@cupertino.org Telephone: 408-777-3223 33 1 Kim Lunt From:Ajit Shanware <ajitshanware@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, January 20, 2021 10:56 PM To:City of Cupertino Bike and Ped Commission Subject:Pedestrian crossing on Prospect CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the  sender and know the content is safe.  Hi:   My name is Ajit Shanware and I have been a resident of Cupertino for 11 years. Our address is 7537 Prospect Rd,  Cupertino, CA 95014. We have observed an increase in traffic on Prospect since last few years.  There is no safe way to  make crossing from one side of the prospect to another particularly on the stretch between DeAnza Blvd and crossing at  Stelling. This is a big problem for residents from both Cupertino and Saratoga who are trying to avoid collision with  oncoming traffic but it is just a matter of time that somebody might get hurt. I urge Cupertino City to install a safe  crossing path potentially at Galway Dr. intersection or at Via Roncole. We need signs that warn traffic about people  crossing the road.  Thank you for considering this request.  Please let me know if you have any questions.  Regards  Ajit  650‐417‐5035  34 1 Kim Lunt From:Brock Carpenter <brockcarpenter@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, January 26, 2021 5:14 PM To:David Stillman; Erik Lindskog Subject:Hazard to Pedestrians at 85 & Stevens Creek - Help! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you  recognize the sender and know the content is safe.      Hi David & Erik,    I’d like the city to help alleviate a hazard to pedestrians walking Westbound on Stevens Creek using the crosswalk over  the on‐ramp to Northbound 85.  (See photo below)    The issue is when a pedestrian is about to enter the crosswalk, the pedestrian cannot see the on‐ramp traffic through  the bushes alongside the sidewalk.  The drivers (traveling 35+ mph) don’t have to stop at this intersection and they can’t  see the pedestrians until they are into the turn and accelerating (not slowing).    If you drive through the on‐ramp, you won’t realize the issue if there is not a pedestrian about to enter the sidewalk.  If  you try using the crosswalk as a pedestrian, you will easily realize you have no sight line to know if there is oncoming  traffic.  The bushes themselves are not very high, but the crosswalk is a couple of feet below the level of traffic on  Stevens Creek which allows the low bushes to block the line of sight.    Perhaps the city could remove the bushes for the safety of the pedestrians?    Thanks for listening,    — Brock Carpenter    Sent from my iPad  35 VTA BPAC Report For Feb 10, 2021 meeting Erik Lindskog Agenda Item #7 36 VTA Staff Report •Caltrans district 4 Ped and Bike commissions had a joint meeting Feb 9: •Oakland slow streets •Ped plan and Bay Area Bike Highway Study updates •Caltrans Complete Streets program 37 County Staff Report •E-bike study program: •Study: •Mode shift •CO2 emissions •Will outfit 4 low income residents in Gilroy. •Will evaluate benefits. •Vacant seats on the county roads commission. 38 Project Initiation Document and Work Plan •List of projects that may be studied over the next few years, 3 year work plan, updated every year. •Possibly Cupertino related in this fiscal year: •SR 85 Noise Reduction Program (Phase 2) - Various Locations •The projects that are tentatively planned to be studied in the upcoming fiscal year, FY 2021, are as follows: •US 101/10th Street Southbound Off-ramp, Gilroy •SR 87/Capitol Expressway Interchange, San Jose •I-280/Bird Avenue Interchange, San Jose •SR 237/Lawrence Expressway Interchange, Sunnyvale •US 101/Ellis Street Interchange, Sunnyvale •SR 87 Technology-based Corridor Improvements, (various locations to-be-determined) •Fiscal year 22/23 –Possibly Cupertino Related: •SR 85 Noise Reduction Program (Phase 2) - Various Locations •Cities can submit projects. •Await review and approval from Caltrans. 39 Fast Transit –Bus Stop Balancing •Bus Stop Balancing aligns with VTA’s business line to provide fast, frequent, and reliable transit. •Some bus stops are proposed to be removed, see next slide. 40 Sunnyvale + Wolfa•nd Prunoridgo Cupertino -~:~~~ • =:.'.%, ·~~~~!! Y A + Wolfo '111d EIAl•nor + Millar and Ri chwood 3 ,, ROUTES6 To make your ride on transit f:ilster, we :are proposing to rnmove stops whern th<!y arn too close together. This means less time stopping in traffic , at red Ughts , and time spent picking up p:assengers on almost every block. Par; h:acer quC! su viaje en transporte publico sea m:is r:ipido, le proponemos eliminar las paradas que es«in demasiado juntas. Est.o significa menos tiempo para deteflE!rse en el tr.Hico, en los 5'!m.3foros en rojo y ti<lmpo para recoger pasai@ros en casi todas las cuadras. 05 lam cho chuy~ di cOa b•n tr~n phl/o'ng t1~ cOng cOng nhanh hon, ch ling tOi d~ xuit lo~i bO cac di~m dl'lng qua g.\n nhau. O~u nay c6 nghTa la It thoi gian di'.mg xe, o, den dO han va danh thoi gian d6n khach tr~n h.\u hi!! cac khu ph6. Let us know what you think! iHiiganos saber lo que pie nsas! Cho chling toi biet ban nghi gl! w~.vta.org/BusStopBalancing Emait BusStopBa/ancing@vta.o,p 408-321-5930 !f Campbell ,.... ____ :::.---.J I ,.....-----....:, Pro1poct and Eng~sh i 6 ; HamMton + Hamilton and Cnioksido +H•milton•nd Nottingham !Attachment A: Rid ers Not ic es I +Hamiton and Birch Effective February 8 • • + • Ballng,;ir LEG-END Bu s mipspr~ till I:,,.. ~~ Norr!tloound to ~ rtin ou:t hoound to T ·mi..,-, Sm1ion d =••==== H mili and 41 Announcements •BTWD (Bike-To -Wherever-Day), May 21 or all of May 42