06. DIR-2005-28 Smith
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM
Application: EXC-200S-17, DIR-2005-28 Agenda Date: November 22, 2005
Applicant: Cal Com Systems (for Verizon Wireless)
Property Owner: Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
Property Location: 10110 California Oak Way (PG&E Monta Vista Substation)
Project Data:
General Plan Land Use Designation: Quasi-Public/InStitutional
Zoning: A-Agriculture
Existing Land Use: electrical substation
Height of Existing Utility Pole: 82 feet
Maximum Antenna Height: 55 feet
Proposed Panel Antennas' Height: 94 feet
Closest Distance to Residential Property Line: 580 feet
APPLICATION SUMMARY:
DIRECTOR'S MINOR MODIFICATION with REFERRAL to the Planning
Commission (file no. DIR-200S-28) to install six (6) 4' x l' panel antennas of a
personal wireless service facility to be mounted to a proposed structural
extension to an existing 82-foot tall P.G.&E. transmission tower, and the
installation of related ground equipment shelter.
HEIGHT EXCEPTION (file no. EXC-200S-17) to allow the six panel antennas to
be mounted at a height of 94 feet - twelve feet above a 82-foot tall P.G.&E.
transmission tower.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of DIR-200S-28 and EXC-200S-17 per the rnodel
resolutions.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, Cal Com Systems, representing Verizon Wireless, is proposing to
install a personal wireless service facility at the P.G.&E. Monta Vista electrical
substation with six proposed antennas (4' x 1') mounted to a structural extension
to be erected twelve feet above an existing 82-foot tall P.G.&E. transmission
tower (Exhibit A). The antennas are a collocation on a tower that currently hosts
two other wireless carriers: Sprint PCS and Cingular Wireless. The tower is
centrally located in the substation and is surrounded by residential uses to the
north, east and south at the distances indicated on the aerial photograph.
Rancho San Antonio Park and the Gate of Heaven Cemetery are located to the
west.
fer I
EKC-Z005-1?, DIR-Z005-28
Page 2
November 22, 2005
Personal Wireless Facility Location Photograph with
Distances to Residential Property Lines
. Personal Wireless Service Facility Location
Discussion:
Existing & Approved Facilities. Four wireless communication companies: Sprint
PCS, Cingular Wireless, T-Mobile and Metro Pes already have approvals for
personal wireless service facilities at the P.G.&E. Monta Vista Substation. The
antennas are collocated on two adjacent transmission towers (two carriers per
tower). The antennas are all mounted on the available legs of the towers below
the lowest insulator arm at heights allowed by the City's wireless
communication facilities ordinance (55 feet and below).
All of these facilities were administratively approved by the Director of
Community Development over the last five years because the facilities have
minimal visibility from public rights-of-way and residential properties (CMC
Section 19.108.090(B)(1)).
2
~ -;;¿
EXC-2005-l7, DIR-2005-28
Page 3
November 22, 2005
Height Exception Tustification. The current applications cannot be approved by
the Director because of the request for an antenna height exception, which
requires a public hearing and Planning Commission approval.
There is no more usable space on the legs of this tower to mount additional panel
antennas. Wireless companies desire a certain separation between its own panel
antennas and those of another company, and P.G.&E. requires a separation of at
least 8 feet between the antenna and the closest high tension wire.
To collocate on the tower, the only available space is on a structural extension to
be mounted 8 feet above the highest wire, which places the antennas at a
maximum height of 94 feet, which is above the 55-foot ordinance maximum. The
structural extension would increase the tower height by approxirnately 15%,
which is minimal, considering that the visual landscape is dominated by
numerous transmission towers and the substation facilities (photo simulations
Exhibits B & C will be available at the hearing). The structural extension,
antennas, and associated cabling should all be painted the same color as the
tower to help mitigate any increased visibility. Such a condition of approval has
been added to the model resolution.
The increased height has the added benefit of extending wireless coverage to a
larger west Cupertino geographic area that is largely underserved for wireless
communications. The obvious benefit of an expanded coverage area is the
potential avoidance of another monopole proposal in a visually sensitive
neighborhood.
Equiprnent Shelter. Verizon Wireless typically builds an equipment shelter to
house the ground equipment: telephone, power, back-up systems for its personal
wireless service facility. The proposed one-story, shelter is approximately 11.5' x
20.5'. The shelter requires mechanical ventilation, but there are no neighbors to
be disturbed by the equipment noise. The proposed shelter is located in a
relatively flat area that requires minimal grading and no tree removal.
Alternatives Analysis & Wireless Coverage. The applicant looked at various
sites in West Cupertino (Exhibit D). As the area is predominately residential,
most sites would require a variance or exception, and generate public
controversy. Existing and proposed coverage maps (Exhibits E & F) show
existing Verizon coverage in the Foothill Boulevard/Stevens Canyon Road
corridor from Highway 280 south. With the facility, there is marked increase in
coverage (red, yellow and green areas) on the west side of Foothill Boulevard
from Oak Valley south to almost McClellan Road.
3
0~3
EXC-2005-17, DIR-2005-28
Page 4
November 22, 2005
Radio Frequency Radiation IRFR) Emissions Assessment. The applicant has
commissioned a study to assess the RFR and compare it to federal safety
standards (Exhibit G). The issue is the cumulative emissions that would be
generated by the two existing and the proposed third personal wireless service
facility at this tower. The study was prepared by Hammett & Edison, lnc. and
signed by a state licensed electrical engineer. The engineer concludes that the
cumulative emissions for the simultaneous operation of all three carrier facilities
would be 2.7% of the maximum public exposure (mpe) limit measured at ground
level. The engineer also calculated the potential exposure if the second floor of a
hypothetical residence was located 360 feet away. The figure was 0.76% of the.
rnpe. Note that the closest residence is even further away at 580 feet, so the
exposure is even less than 0.76 of the mpe.
As the project and cumulative RFR emissions are well below federal safety
standards, federal law (The Telecommunications Act of 1996) prohibits local
government agencies from regulating personal wireless service facilities on the
basis of RFR emissions.
Height Exception Findings.
A height exception may be granted if the Planning Commission can make all of
the prescribed findings. Staff has listed the findings below and discussed
whether the applicant's exception request meets the finding.
A. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in
restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title.
Staff believes that this finding can be made as the extra antenna height allows the
company to provide more complete wireless communications coverage in a
known underserved area. One of the purposes of the ordinance is to "facilitate
the development of a wireless communications infrastructure in the City for
commercial, public and emergency uses..."
The height exception also facilitates the collocation of antenna on the
transmission tower, which is a preferred design strategy where visual irnpacts
are minimal.
B. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition that will be
detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will
not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare.
Staff believes this finding can be made. The company uses a technology with
power outputs that are well below federal standards for exposure to radio
frequency radiation. Cumulative RFR emissions from all three carriers are also
below federal safety standards. The project will have a minimal visual impact as
4
b~L-f
EXC-200S-17, DIR-200S-28
Page 5
November 22, 2005
the panel antenna will be flush-mounted to a short structural extension of an
existing transmission tower and painted to match the pole. The extension is less
than 15% of the total tower height in a visual landscape dominated by numerous
other transmission towers and the electrical substation.
C. That the exception to be granted will not result in a hazardous condition for
pedestrians and vehicular traffic.
The location of proposed improvements do not interfere with pedestrian or
vehicular travel ways nor do they obstruct lines of sight for these travel ways.
Public Notification. For the purposes of this public hearing, meeting notices
were mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the property boundaries
of this P.G.&E. property as depicted in Exhibit H.
Enclosures:
Model Resolutions
Exhibit A: Applicant's Project Description
Exhibit B & C: Photo Simulations (will be available at the hearing)
Exhibit D: Alternatives Analysis
Exhibit E: Existing Verizon coverage map
Exhibit F: Proposed Verizon coverage rnap
Exhibit G: RFR Assessment for Proposed Verizon Wireless Base Station
prepared by Hammett & Edison, Inc. and dated November 14, 2005.
Exhibit H: Mailing radius for project applications
Plan Set
Colin Jung, Senior Planner .
Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development };;ÞA..Æ ~ ~ a _ II
. -·~>4Z..1
C lcJ ð<..ð2f2J.p
Submitted by:
Approved by:
g:plarming! pdreport! pcEXCreportsfEXC-2005·17.doc
5
/P -5
EXC-2005-17
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A HEIGHT EXCEPTION TO ALLOW SIX PANEL ANTENNAS TO BE
MOUNTED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 94 FEET ON AN EXTENSION TO AN
EXISTING P.G.&E. TRANSMISSION TOWER AT 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
EXC-2005-l7
Cal Com Systems, Inc. (for Verizon Wireless)
I 0 110 California Oak Way
SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR EXCEPTION
WHEREAS, in order to provide height flexibility in situations when collocation of personal
wireless service antennas is desirable from a design and visual standpoint, an applicant for
development may file an exception request to seek approval to deviate from the standards; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regards to the Height Exception
for this application:
1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title in that the extra antenna height above the
ordinance maximum is needed to provide more extensive wireless communications coverage
in a known, underserved area and the height exception facilitates the collocation of antenna
on the transrnission tower, which is a preferred design strategy where visual impacts are
minimal.
2. That the proposed project will not be injurious to property or irnprovements in the area nor be
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare in that the wireless technology
produces radiation below federal exposure standards on an individual and cumulative level.
The equipment will have minimal visual impact as the panel antenna will be flush-mounted
to the tower extension and painted to match the tower and the extension represents less than
15% of the existing tower height.
3. The proposed development will not create a hazardous condition for pedestrian or vehicular
traffic because it is not sited within the travel ways or sight lines of pedestrian or vehicular
traffic.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted
in this matter, application no. EXC-2005-l7 is hereby approved; and
fc ~(,
Resolution No.
Page 2
EXC-2005-l7
November 22, 2005
That the sub conclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are
based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXC-2005-l7, as set
forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 22, 2005, and are
incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION ill: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "VERlZON WIRELESS, FOOTHILL & McCLELLAN,
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY, CUPERTINO, CA 95014, SANTA CLARA COUNTY",
consisting of eight sheets dated 11/11/05 and labeled: T-l, T-2, C-l, C-2, Al through A-4,
except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES. DEDICATIONS. RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount
of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are
hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020( a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such
exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Gilbert Wong, Chair
Planning Commission
g:/planning/pdreport/res/EXC-2005-17 res. doc
0~'7
DIR-2005-28
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
MODEL RESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A DIRECTOR'S MINOR MODIFICATION TO ALLOW THE ERECTION OF A
PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY THAT INCLUDES SIX PANEL ANTENNAS
MOUNTED TO A STRUCTURAL EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING P.G.&E. TRANSMISSION
TOWER LOCATED AT 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
SECTION 1: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received a referral of a
Director's Minor Modification, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application;
and has satisfied the following requirements:
1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and Cupertino Wireless Facilities Master Plan
and the purpose of this title.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application for Director's Minor Modification is hereby approved;
and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. DIR-200S-
28 as Set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 22, 2005,
and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
&,s
Resolution No.
Page-2
DIR-2005-28
November 22, 2005
SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
DIR-200S-28
Cal Com Systems (for Verizon Wireless)
10110 California Oak Way
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "VERIZ0N WIRELESS, FOOTHILL &
McCLELLAN, 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY, CUPERTINO, CA 95014, SANTA
CLARA COUNTY", consisting of eight sheets dated 11/11/05 and labeled: T-1, T-2, C-1,
C-2, Al through A-4, except as rnay be amended by the conditions contained in this
resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other
exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you
rnay protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. 1£ you fail to file a protest within this 90-
day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
3. TOWER EQUIPMENT COLOR
All panel antennas, mounting hardware, tower extension and cabling shall be painted to a
flat gray color to match the existing transmission tower.
4. ABANDONMENT
Aerial facilities not used for their permitted purpose for a period of 18 months is
considered abandoned and must be removed by the property owner or applicant who
bears the entire cost of demolition.
s. EXPIRATION OF APPROVAL
This approval expires five (5) years after the effective date of this exception. The
applicant may renew this permit upon a review of the technology to determine if the
visual impact can be further minimized.
~ ~q
t\ìt\\åï': Pt
CAl COM SYSTEMS II NC.,
2001 Omega Road # 20t, SanRamon, CA 94583
September 23, 2005
City of Cupertino Planning Department
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Dear Planning Official:
INTRODUCTION
Verizon Wireless is the largest wireless communications provider in the U.S. with more
than 31 million wireless voice and data customers. The coast-to-coast wireless provider
was formed by the combination of the U.S. wireless businesses of Verizon
Communications and Vodafone, including Bell Atlantic Mobile, AirTouch Cellular, GTE
Wireless and PrimeCo Personal Communications. With demand for wireless service
growing steadily, Verizon Wireless needs to build and expand its wireless network to
meet customers' expectations for reliable, high quality wireless service. Wireless service
also enhances public safety and emergency communications in many Bay Area
communities. Hundreds of E-911 calls are made everyday reporting crirnes, medical
emergencies, and car accidents, making roadways and neighborhoods safer. In an effort
to irnprove coverage in the area around Stevens Creek and Foothill Boulevards in
Cupertino, Verizon is seeking to construct a wireless telecommunications facility to
better serve its customer's needs.
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
Verizon Wireless is pursuing an unmanned wireless communication facility to be co-
located atop an existing PG&E transmission tower at the Monte Vista Substation facility
in Cupertino.
The proposed facility will consist of six (6) 4'x l' panel antennas, to be mounted to a
proposed twelve foot structural extension to the tower. The proposed ll'x 20' equipment
shelter would be located in space adjacent to the existing tower.
The proposed facility is an unoccupied passive use. After initial construction period of
approximately one-month the site will be visited by Verizon for visual inspection and
maintenance only as needed.
& -/1
'Ei.\t\SlT: D
CAL COM SYSTEMS II NC.,
2001 Omega Road # 201, San Ramon, CA 94583
November 14, 2005
Colin Jung
City of Cupertino Planning Department
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
RE: Proposed Verizon Wireless Facility at the Monte Vista PG&E Substation
Dear Mr. Jung:
Pursuant to the application submitted on 9/27/05 for the above-referenced project, the
following is an alternative site analysis and explanation of the specific coverage
objectives of the site, Coverage maps depicting the existing and proposed coverage
levels in the area have been included for your review, The color scheme used on these
maps is as follows: red - in building coverage, highest levels; yellow - in car coverage,
moderate levels; green - on street coverage, low levels. All other colored areas on the
map indicate little or no coverage, Also included for your review is a copy of the RF
compliance form stating that the site will be within the allowable FCC standards for
emissions,
Alternate Site Analysis/Coverage Objectives
The proposed site is needed to improve the existing low signal levels in the areas around
the intersection of Foothill and Stevens Creek boulevards. The area is currently served
by three existing sites: Hwy 280IMary to the north, and the Hwy/85 and Deanza College
sites located to the east. There are currently no existing Verizon sites south of the
proposed site at the Monte Vista Substation, which results in poor coverage to the areas
to the south along Foothill Boulevard down to McClellan Rd.
In response to numerous customer complaints in the Rancho Deep Cliff area, Verizon
first investigated the possibility oflocating a facility somewhere within the Rancho Deep
Cliff development, and met with a member of the homeowners association to evaluate
possible locations. The first possible site explored was an abandoned 40' self supported
lattice tower previously used for television transmission purposes by the association.
While this existing tower would have worked well for antenna placement, there was no
available space for the equipment shelter, and the proximity of the adjacent residential
uses could have posed a problem with equipment noise. We next looked into the
possibility of locating atop the existing club house building near the tennis courts. The
0-(3
local topography of this area being in a "bowl" prevented this building and most other
parts of the Rancho Deep Cliff area fi:om meeting the coverage objectives of the site, and
would only cover a very small area with the signal levels not even reaching Foothill
Boulevard. It was therefore determined that the only way to effectively cover the
surrounding areas trom within Rancho Deep Cliff area would be to construct a tower
approximately 70-80' in height, which would rnost likely be met with opposition fi:om
surrounding property owners. The adjoining Deep Cliff Golf Course was also
approached by Verizon with a proposal to construct a 70' treepole, bur was not interested
and declined the offer.
Height Exception Justification
The proposed PG&E transmission tower at the Monte Vista substation will meet the
coverage objectives of the site, and serve to be part of active co-location with two other
carriers on the tower. Because there are two other carriers on this tower, Verizon is
seeking a height exception to add a proposed 12' extension to the tower for the placement
of their antennas. This additional height would also allow for extended coverage to the
areas south ofthe site along Foothill Boulevard.
Sincerely,
~.1C~/~
~~~mlth
Cal Corn Systems
925-683-5041
0-1+
f>Ht \ tXI: G
Verizon Wireless' Proposed Base Station (Site No. 161556 "Foothill & McClellan")
10110 California Oak Way' Cupertino, California
Statement of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers
The finn of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has been retained on behalf of Verizon
Wireless, a personal wireless telecommunications carrier, to evaluate the base station (Site No. 161556
"Foothill & McClellan") proposed to be located at 10110 California Oak Way in Cupertino, California,
for compliance with appropriate guidelines limiting human exposure to radio frequency ("RF")
electromagnetic fields.
Prevailing Exposure Standards
The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") evaluate its actions
for possible significant impact on the environment. In Docket 93-62, effective October 15, 1997, the
FCC adopted the human exposure limits for field strength and power density recommended in Report
No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields,"
published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and
Measurements ("NCRP"). Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions,
with the latter limits generally five times more restrictive. The more recent Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers ("IEEE") Standard C95.l-l999, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human
Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," includes nearly identical
exposure limits. A summary of the FCC's exposure limits is shown in Figure 1. These limits apply
for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons,
regardless of age, gender, size, or health.
The most restrictive lirnit for exposures of unlimited duration to radio frequency energy for several
personal wireless services are as follows:
Personal Wireless Service
Personal Communication ("PCS")
Cellular Telephone
Specialized Mobile Radio
[most restrictive frequency range]
Annrox. Frequency
1,950 MHz
870
855
30-300
0CClWational Limit
5.00 mW/cm2
2.90
2.85
1.00
Public Limit
1.00 mW/cm2
0.58
0.57
0.20
Power line frequencies (60 Hz) are well below the applicable range of these standards, and there is
considered to be no compounding effect from simultaneous exposure to power line and radio frequency
fields.
General Facility Requirements
Base stations typically consist of two distinct parts: the electronic transceivers (also called "radios" or
"cabinets") that are connected to the traditional wired telephone lines, and the passive antennas that
send the wireless signals created by the radios out to be received by individual subscriber units. The
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SAN FRANCISCO
VW161556596
Page 1 of 4
b-1'7
Verizon Wireless. Proposed Base Station (Site No. 161556 "Foothill & McClellan")
10110 California Oak Way· Cupertino, California
transceivers are often located at ground level and are connected to the antennas by coaxial cables about
1 inch thick. Because of the short wavelength of the ITequencies assigned by the FCC for wireless
services, the antennas require line-of-sight paths for their signals to propagate well and so are installed
at some height above ground. The antennas are designed to concentrate their energy toward the
horizon, with very little energy wasted toward the sky or the ground. Along with the low power of
such facilities, this means that it is generally not possible for exposure conditions to approach the
maximum permissible exposure limits without being physically very near the antennas.
Computer Modeling Method
The FCC provides direction for determining compliance in its Office of Engineering and Technology
Bulletin No. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to
Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997. Figure 2 attached describes the calculation
methodologies, reflecting the facts that a directional antenna's radiation pattern is not fully formed at
locations very close by (the "near-field" effect) and that the power level ITom an energy source
decreases with the square of the distance from it (the "inverse square law"). The conservative nature
of this method for evaluating exposure conditions has been verified by numerous field tests.
Site and Facility Description
Based upon information provided by Verizon, including drawings by AT! Architects and Engineers,
dated September 19, 2005, it is proposed to mount six Andrew directional antennas, three cellular
Model BXA-80063-8CF and three PCS Model BXA-185063-l2CF, on a new l2-foot extension to be
installed above an existing 82-foot PG&E tower (#18/114) located near 10110 California Oak Way in
Cupertino. The antennas would be mounted at an effective height of about 92 feet above ground and
would be oriented in pairs toward looT, 80oT, and l50°T. The maximum effective radiated power in
any direction would be 930 watts, representing simultaneous operation of seven cellular channels at
30 watts each and three PCS channels at 240 watts each.
Presently located on the same tower are similar antennas for Sprint PCS, and Cingular Wireless has
proposed to install antennas for its network there, too. For the limited purposes of this study, it is
assumed that Sprint has installed EMS Model RR90l7 directional panel antennas at an effective height
of28 feet above ground, that Cingular will install Kathrein Model AP14/17-880/l950/065D directional
dualband antennas at an effective height of 38 feet above ground, and that the maximum effective
radiated power in any direction is 1,000 watts for Sprint and 2,000 watts for Cingular.
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SAN FRANCISCO
VW161556596
Page 2 of4
~ ~/0
Verizon Wireless' Proposed Base Station (Site No. 161556 "Foothill & McClellan")
10110 California Oak Way' Cupertino, California
Study Results
For a person anywhere at ground, the maximum ambient RF exposure level due to the proposed
Verizon operation by itself is calculated to be 0.00045 mW/cm2, which is 0.045% of the applicable
public limit. The maxlinum calculated cumulative level at ground for the simultaneous operation of all
carriers is 2.7% of the public exposure limit; the maximum calculated cumulative level at the second-
floor elevation of any nearby building' is 0.76% of the public exposure limit. It should be noted that
these results include several "worst-case" assumptions and therefore are expected to overstate actual
power density levels.
No Recommended Mitigation Measures
Since they are to be mounted on a PG&E tower, the Verizon antennas are not accessible to the general
public, and so no mitigation measures are necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure
guidelines. It is presumed that PG&E already takes adequate precautions to ensure that there is no
unauthorized access to its tower. To prevent exposures in excess of the occupational limit by
authorized PG&E workers, it is expected that they will adhere to appropriate safety protocols
adopted by that company.
Conclusion
Based on the infonnation and analysis above, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that the base
station proposed by Verizon Wireless at 10110 California Oak Way in Cupertino, California, will
comply with the prevailing standards for limiting public exposure to radio frequency energy and,
therefore, will not for this reason cause a significant impact on the environment. The highest calculated
level in publicly accessible areas is much less than the prevailing standards allow for exposures of
unlimited duration. This finding is consistent with measurements of actual exposure conditions taken
at other operating base stations.
'" Located at least 360 feet away, based on aerial photos from Terraserver.
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SAN FRANOSCO
VW161556596
Page 3 of 4
~ -/Q
Verizon Wireless· Proposed Base Station (Site No. 161556 "Foothill & McClellan")
10110 California Oak Way· Cupertino, California
Authorship
The undersigned author of this statement is a qualified Professional Engineer, holding California
Registration Nos. E-13026 and M-20676, which expire on June 30, 2007. This work has been carried
out by him or under his direction, and all statements are true and correct of his own knowledge except,
where noted, when data has been supplied by others, which data he believes to be correct.
November 14, 2005
,P.E.
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
CONSULTWG ENGINEERS
SAN FRANOSCO
VW161556596
Page 4 of4
o ~;«()
FCC Radio Frequency Protection Guide
The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC")
to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have
a significant impact on the environment. The FCC adopted the limits from Report No. 86, "Biological
Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radioftequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the
Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, which are
nearly identical to the more recent Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standard
C95.l-l999, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic
Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz." These limits apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are
intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or
health.
As shown in the table and chart below, separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure
conditions, with the latter limits (in italics and/or dashed) up to five times more restrictive:
Frequencv
Applicable
Range
(MHz)
0.3 - 1.34
1.34 - 3.0
3.0 - 30
30 - 300
300 - 1,500
1,500- 100,000
Electromagnetic Fields (f is frequencv of emission in MHz)
Electric Magnetic Equivalent Far-Field
Field Strength Field Strength Power Density
(Vim) (Nm) (mW/cm')
614 614 \.63 1.63 100 100
614 823.81f \.63 2. 191f 100 1801/
1842/f 82Hlf 4.89/f 2. 191f 900/F 180//
6\.4 27.5 0.163 0.0729 \.0 0.2
3.54Vr 1.59{¡ Vr 1106 {f/238 fY300 f/1500
137 61.4 0.364 0.163 5.0 1.0
1000
~ 100
þN
~ ..-< S 10
~ i'J ~
o "
"'~S 1
~
0.1
./ Occupational Exposure
,/'" PCS
,
, FM
,
~
/'-
Public Exposure
____I
-
0.1
1
10 100 103
Frequency (MHz)
104
105
Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or
thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits, and higher
levels also are allowed for exposures to small areas, such that the spatially averaged levels do not
exceed the limits. However, neither of these allowances is incorporated in the conservative calculation
formulas in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) for
projecting field levels. Hammett & Edison has built those formulas into a proprietary program that
calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any
number of individual radio sources. The program allows for the description of buildings and uneven
terrain, if required to obtain more accurate projections.
HAMMEIT & EDISON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SAN FRANCISCO
FCC Guidelines
Figure 1
(rJI
RFRCALC TM Calculation Methodology
Assessment by Calculation of Compliance with FCC Exposure Guidelines
The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to
adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a
significant impact on the environment. The maximum permissible exposure limits adopted by the FCC
(see Figure 1) apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent
margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for
short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for
occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits.
Near Field.
Prediction methods have been developed for the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip
(omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireless telecommunications cell sites. The near field zone is
defined by the distance, D, from an antenna beyond which the manufacturer's published, far field
antenna patterns will be fully formed; the near field may exist for increasing D until some or all of three
conditions have been met:
1) D>~
2) D > 5h
3) D > 1.6^
where h = aperture height ofthe antenna, in meters, and
^ = wavelength of the transmitted signal, in meters.
The FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) gives this formula for
calculating power density in the near field zone about an individual RF source:
. S 180 0.1 x Puet
power density ~ tJBW x 1t x D x h' in mW!cm2,
where eBW = half-power beamwidth of antenna, in degrees, and
Pnet = net power input to the antenna, in watts.
The factor of 0.1 in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This formula has
been built into a proprietary program that calculates distances to FCC public and occupational limits.
Far Field.
OET-65 gives this formula for calculating power density in the far field of an individual RF source:
d . S -_ 2.56 x 1.64 x 100 x RFF2 x ERP ¡'n mW!cm2
Power enslty
4x7txD2 ' ,
where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatts,
RFF = relative field factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and
D = distance from the center of radiation to the point of calculation, in meters.
The factor of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assuming a
reflection coefficient of 1.6 (1.6 x 1.6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a half-wave dipole
relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor of 100 in the numerator converts to the desired units of
power density. This formula has been built into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location
on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual
radiation sources. The program also allows for the description of uneven terrain in the vicinity, to
obtain more accurate projections.
;;:~,.,-,~j, ~r~:':;
.'.i".'·.i(\<p'~·"
;;;r (~3L;;2;;~.;
HAMMETT & EorSON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SAN FRANCISCO
Methodology
Figure 2
(¡;-J ,p,
hi
~I
J~ ~IIII .u~
..:....,~
..,co......
~~;.~
~.=~f,1
G ~;i
!~~"-
- -
- -
~ .
ve"7onwlreless
YElUOI'IWlREl£SS
27~ IIIITCHEI..I.DRM:
W"'-HJT~CAI4_
FOOTHILL 6. McCLELLAN
SITE NO. 1615'58
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
APPROVALS
LEASING: 0.1[,_
ZONING: DATE:_
Rf ENGINEER; DATE=-
CONSTRUCTION; DATE:_
EQUIP. ENGR: DATE:_
OWNER: DATE:
I SITE NO 161556 I
¡APPROVED BY "' I
I DRAWN BY IN I
I CHECKED BY "' I
NO DATC" ISSUE
~ 09/06/05 ZD REVIEW
09/19/05 ZD SUBMITIAL
11/"/05 CITY COMMENTS
SHEET TITLE
TITLE SHEET
SHEET NUMBER
T-1 ]
tÞ~
COMPANY J08 NO. CA0242 I
wireless
-
rl
McCLELLAN
&
FOOTHILL
NEWARK/
MAGNESIUM
TOWER #: 18/114
LINE NAME
.
WAY
SAP # : 40752557
SITE NO. 161556
10110 CALIFORNIA
CUPERTINO. 95014
SANTA CLA OUNTY
OAK
PROJECT DATA
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
77 BEALE STREET, ROOM 2.361
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
CONTACT: RICHARD SARTlNI
TEL If. 415-.308-9400
TOWER OWNER:
CODE COMPLIANCE
ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING
CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES.
NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK
NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES.
MAP
VICINITY
MAP
LOCATION
GO SOUTHWEST ON MITCHELL DR TOWARD N WlGET LN. TURN LEFT ONTO
N WlGET LN. TURN RIGHT ONTO YGNACIO VALLEY RD. MERGE ONTO
1-680 S TOWARD SAN JOSE. TAKE THE MISSION BLVD WEST EXIT
TOWARD 1-880/WARM SPRINGS DISTRICT/UC EXTENSION. MERGE ONTO
MISSION BLVD/CA-262 W. MERGE ONTO 1-880 S TOWARD SAN JOSE.
MERGE ONTO CA-237 W TOWARD MTN VIEW. MERGE ONTO CA-85 S
TOWARD CA-82 SILOS GATOS/SANTA CRUZ. TAKE THE STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD EXIT. TURN RIGHT ONTO STEVENS CREEK BLVD. TURN RIGHT
ONTO CALIFORNIA OAK WAY. END AT 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
CUPERTINO, CA 95014-5655. US
00
A TI A&E
3860 BLACKHAWK ROAD
DANV1LLE, CA. 94506
CONTACT: MARK SORENSON, P.E.
TEL II: 925-648-8800
FAX II: 925-648-8811
SHEET
{PAGE
(PAGE 2
SI TE PLAN
SHELTER PLAN & ANTENNA PLAN
NORTHEAST [LEVA T¡ON
NORTHWEST ELEVATION
342-63-001
61556
4'-O~ VERIZON PANEL ANTENNAS
.3 SECTORS - 2 ANTENNAS PER SECTOR
90 FT.
90 FT.
90 FT.
NOTES & DETAILS
VERIZON \'t1RELESS
2785 MITCHELL DRIVE
WALNUT CREEK, CA. 94598
CONTACT: JIM GRAHAM
TEL ff: 925-279-6333
CAL COM SYSTDAS
2001 OMEGA ROAD, SUITE
SAN RAMON, CA 94583
CONTACT: KEITH SCHMID
TEL #: 408-679-1141
SITE SURVEY
SITE SURVEY
A1
A2
A3
A4
LEGEND
SITE DATA
GROuP U
N.R.
SECTOR
SECTOR 2
SECTOR .3
A.P.N.
SITE NUM8ER
ZONING :
ANTENNA TYPE
COAX LENGTH
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A TOTAL OF (6) 4'-O~ VERIZON PANEL ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED
ON THE EXISTING PG&E LATTTlCE TOWER. VERIZON WIRELESS
EQUIPMENT SHELTER TO BE INSTALLED IN A 20'-0~ x 30'-0" LEASE
AREA. (2) GPS ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED TO SHELTER.
NDEX
TITLE SHEET
LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS, GENERAL
OF 2)
Of 2)
BUILDING
OCCUPANCY
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
@
o
"
,
<
·
"
~
·
o
l
.,
~
~
<
5>
~
;:
·
~
"
~
]
·
~
"
i
5>
¡
..
~
¡
",
81
~
o
<
5>
5>
·
APPLICANT
ARCHI TECTURAl/EN GIN EER
T1
T2
C1
C2
AGENT
CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE {INCLUDING TiTlE 24 & 25
CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 2001
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 2001
CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2001
CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE, 2001
COUNTY ORDIN ANCES
THE PROJECT TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT SHELTER (VERIZON
WIRELESS SHELTER) IS DESIGNED UNDER THE JURtSDICTION OF THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT Of HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
(HCD). THE VERIZON SHELTER IS DESIGNED UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS
(STANDARDS) FOR COMMERCIAL COACHES (DESCRIBED IN INFORMATION
BULLETIN HH9.3-10). THE HCD PRESENTLY UTILIZES THE 1991 AND 1994
UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AS THEIR GOVERNtNG REGULATIONS FOR
COMMERCIAL COACHES.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION.
HANDICAPPED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT REOUIRED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE.
CALIFORNIA COACH
NOTE
CUPERTINO
@
CREEK
STEVENS
SITE DIRECTION
WlRELESS (WALNUT CREEK)
AVE.
CALIFORNIA
OAK WAY
FROM VERIZON
CREEK
Bi
OAKLAND
SITE
JOSE
QJ
~I ~
È
~I ~
J~ ~llllllml
id2~
o .
-
-
~
Verl70nwireless
YERtZON"'REILSS
21B$Wfctl£lLDfiIY[
WNJIUfœEEK. CII'~~B
FOOTHILL &. McCLELLAN
SITE NO. 161556
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
APPROVALS
LEASING: DI\TE_
ZONING: DATE_
Rf ENGINEER: DATE:_
COHSTRUCTlON: DATE:_
EQUIP. mGR: DATE:_
OWNER: 0.1[,_
I SITE NO 151556
¡APPROVED BY "5
DRAWN BY J'
CHECKED BY "5
NO DATE ISSUE
j 09/06/05 ZO REVIEW
09/19/05 ZD SUBMITTAL
11/11/05 CITY COMMENTS
SHEET TITLE
LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS,
AND GENERAL NOTES
SHEET NUMBER
T-2
-
41 !COMPANY JOB NO. CA0242
GROUT OR PLASTER
(E) BRICK
(E¡MASONRY
CONCRETE
EARTH
GRAVEL
PLYWOOD
SAND
WOODCONr
WOOD BLOCKING
STE(L
CENTERLINE
PROPERTY/LEAs[
LINE
GROUND CONDUCTOR
TELEPHONE CONDUIT
ELECTRICALCONOUIT
COAXIAL CABLE
MECHANICAL
OVERHEAOSER\IIŒ
CONDUCTORS
CH,o,lNlINKFENCING
PRIMARY VOLTAGE
ELECTRICAL CONDUIT
JOINT TRENCH
(ELECTRIC/TELCO)
f1
(N) VERIZON
'MRELESS
AN1ENNA, TYP.
21/2" HORIZONTAL
PIPE BRACKETS
ATTACH TO
TOWER LEG
21/2" ANTENNA
~OUNTING PIPE -
6' LONG
J'-O'
"'~-~._-,~~..' -,~
.. ....
I·; t
~Tr"'~6,-6'T~'-;-¡
,,~~~~~ ~~~,~:~;t
"" ,n
t:; 'co' -.. --:,._~
I2$:J
c:::;;:J
"'" "'"
-,-
-,-
-,-
-,-
-T/E-
-,-
-,-
-E/T-
Ç> NEW ANTENNA
Y EXISTINGANITNNA
0 GROUND ROD
~ GROUND BUS BAR
. UECIO'NICAL GRND.
CONNECTION
. CAOWElD
0 CHRISTY BOX
[;] ElECTRICBDX
j) LIGHT POlE
0 FND ~ONUIoIENT
~ SPOT ElEVATI(X\I
ð. SET POINT
& RE\I1SIDN
0 GRID REFERENCE
@ DETAllREHRENCE
~ ElEVATlDNFlEFERENCE
0 . SECTIONRErERENCE
Q I.cATCHllNE
~ WORK POINT
2 LEGEND
;¡
0
x
<
x
~
x
<
0
,
'"
5 ANTENNA DETAIL
SPEClFlCATION(S)
"'"''''
STAINLESS STEEl
SEESTRUClURAlDRA.....NGS
STANOARD
"'...
STRUC'JURAl
TO BE DElERWINED
TDoIPORARY
THICX(NESS)
TOE NAIL
TOP OF ANTENNA
TOP Of" CURB
TOP Of" PLATE (PARAPET)
TOP Of STEEl
TOP Of" WALl.
TYPICAl
UNDERGROUND
UNDERWRITERS lABORATORY
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
VERIFYINflELD
'MDE(WlDTH)
~'"
WOOD
WEATHERPROOF
"'''"'
TRANSFORUER
crnTERUNE
....'"
AZIUUTH
F.O,C.
F.O.U.
F.O.S
F.O."".
F.S.
n·n
'"
GR.
"
..
'm
Gl8.(GlU-lAN)
'"
0""'.
_.
"'"
"'.
,COS.
J~f)
LB.(f)
L'.
U.
L
UAS.
""
W.B.
WECH.
"eR
WIN.
WISe.
"'"
~NJ.(f)
N.T.S.
O.C,
DPNG.
'I'
'"
PLY.
""
,eo
,eo
P.S.F.
P.S.!.
P,T.
"'...
on
RAD.(R)
..".
RÐNF.
REO·D.
..".
"'".
SLD.
SHT.
...
"
3 ABBREVIATIONS
rM:~ g~~S)
',',',;,'-,',
c=
'" ',',',',',',
'" """
. .
2 PER UNISTRU1
UIN..TYP._
1/4" .. ~ J" LOI
LAG BOLT. TYP,
GPS ANTENNA DETAIL
1-1/4"' PlP£
CABLE TO PIPE CONNECTOR
BURNDY TYPE GAR
CDNT\'IUOUS BEAD OF
SllICONES£ALANT
. TOP OF UNISTRUT (T"rP.)
CONDUIT ClAMP
NEopRENE WASHER
. ATTACHMENT (TYP.)
12" WIN. LENGTH
UNISTRUT P5DOO (TYF'.)
(E) WECHANICAl EOUIPWENT SCREEN
16 AWG GROUNDING KIT CABLE
1/2"' COA>CAl CABLE
COPPER ISOlATED GROUND BUS
SPEC.
'"
S.S.
S.S.D
sm.
S"-.
STRUe.
T.B.O.
TEt.lP.
'"'.
T.N.
T.OA
T.O.C.
T.O.P.
T.O.S.
T.O.W.
w.
oo
'.L
U.N.O.
V.I.F.
.
:t.
W.P.
'"
"'""
<
.
.,.
FACE OF CONCRETE
FACE OF WASONRY
FACE Of"STVO
FACE OF WAlL
FINISH SURfACE
FOOT(FEET)
FOOTING
GROWTH (CABIH£T)
GAUGE
GA1.VANlZf{O)
GROltIDfNJlTORtUlTlHttRlM'TER
GLUE LAMINATED BE"'"
GLOBAl POSITIONING SYSTEM
"''''''
HEADER
HANGER
HEIGHT
tSOLATm COPPER CROOND BItS
:=~~~
POUND(S)
LAG BOlTS
liNEAR FEET (FOOT)
LONG(I'JUDINAL)
MASOHRY
MAXIMUM
MACHINE BOlT
MECHANiCAl
MANUfAClURER
MINIMUM
MISCELLANEOUS
METAL
"'.
NUMBER
NOT TO SCALE
ON CENTER
OPENING
PRECAST CONCRtTE
PÐlS(J(AlWlIIJNlCA1KII!iÐ!YICES
""""""
POINT OF CONNECTION
POWER PROTECTION CABINET
PRIMARY RADIO CABINET
POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT
POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
PRESSURE TREATED
POWER (CABINET)
QUANTITY
RADIUS
REFERENCE
REINfORCEt.lENT( NG)
REQUIRED
RIGID GALVANIZED STEEl
SCHEDULE
SCE ELECTRICAL ORA~NC:S
'"Err
SI~llAR
SERVICE PANEl
ANCHOR BOlT
"""
ANTENNA CABLE
COYER ASSEMBLY
ADDITIONAl
ABO'vt: FlKlSHED FlOOR
ABOVE: FINISHED OftAOE
ABO'Æ GROUND LEVEL
ALUt,lINUW
AlTERNATE
ANTENNA
AF'PRDXlt.lAT£(LY¡
AROiITECT(URAL
AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE
BARE COPPER WIRE
""""'
..'"
BlOCKING
'''"
BOUNDARY NAlUNG
BOTTOM OF FOOTING
BACK-UP CABINET
CABINET
CANTlL£'ÆR(EO)
CAST IN PLACE
CEILING
OU:'"
COlUMN
CONCRETE
CONNECTlON(OR)
CONSTRUCTION
CONTINUOUS
PENNY (NAILS)
""'"
DEPARTMENT
DOUGlAS FIR
DlAWETER
DIAGONAL
DIMENSION
DRAWlNG(S)
OO'llO.(S)
<AC><
Ð.EVATION
ELECTRICAl
ELEVATOR
£l£GTRIGAl1ofETAll1CT\JBING
EDGE NAil
ENGlNŒR
''''''
EXPANSION
EXISTING
EXTERIOR
FABRICATlON(OR)
fINISHFl~
FINISH GRADE
FlNISH(ED)
n.,,"
FOUNDATION
A.B.
ABV.
ACCA
""'.,
A.F.F.
A.F.G.
'CL
"""'
m.
"',.
APPRX.
"'''".
'WOo
BCW.
'"".
,"'.
BLKG.
...
B.N.
B,O.f.
''''
CAB.
CANT.
C.I.P.
0.'.
0.><.
",-
00<0
CONN.
CONST.
CONT.
,
DBL
DEPT.
D.f.
DIA.
DIAG.
DIM.
'WO.
0....
".
'L
ElEC.
ElEV.
EMT.
E.N.
ENG.
".
"0>.
EXST.(E
EXT.
FAB.
F.F.
F.G.
FIN.
nR.
"N.
,. THE FAaUTY IS AN UNOCCUPI£D MOBILE RADIO FACILITY.
,. PLANS ARE NOT TO BE SCAlED. THESE PLANS ARE INTEND(¡) TO BE A
DIAGRAMMATIC OUTUNE ONLY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE WORK SHAll
INClUDE fURNISHING MATERiAlS. EQUIPMENT AND APPURTENANCES. AND LABOR
NECESSARY TO EFFECT ALL. INSTAlLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.
J. INSTAll All EQUIPMENT AND t.4ATERIAlS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENDATIONS UNlESS SPECIFICAllY OTHERWISE INDICATED OR WHERE LOCAL
COOES OR REGUlATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE.
4. CONTRACTOR SHAlL NOTIFY PROJECT WANAGER Of" ALL PRODUCTS OR ITEMS NOITo
AS "EXISTING" WHICH ARE NOT FOUND TO BE IN THE fiELD.
5. ALL WORK PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTAlLED SHALL BE IN STRICT
ACCORDANCE, AS A MINIt.lUM STANDARD, 'MTH ALL APPUCABLE CODES,
REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES HA'ANG ..LJRISOICTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE
AlL NOTICES AND COt.lPlY 't\'lTH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES. RULES, REGULATIONS
AND LAlWUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBUC AUTHORITY BEARING ON THE PERFORI.IANCE
OF THE WORK. ELECTRICAl SYSTEI.IS SHALL BE INSTAlLED IN ACCORDANCE 'MTH
ALL APPUCABLE MUNICIPAL CODES, NATIONAl ELECTRIC CODE, AND UTIUTY
COMPANY SPEClflCATIONS. AND LOCAl AND STATE .AJRISDICTIONAL CODES,
ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATla-IS.
,. SEAL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED AREAS IMTH U.l. LISTED AND FIRE
CODE APPROVED t.4ATERIAlS.
7. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHAll BE IN ACCORDANCE Wl1H CHAPTER 16 Of" THE UNIFORW
BULLDING CODE REGARDING EARTHQUAKE PROVISIONS FOR PIPING. UGHT
flXTURES. CEILING GRID, INTERIOR PARTITIONS AND MECHAN!CAl EQUIPMENT.
ALL. WORK MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL EARTHOUAKE COOES AND
REGULATIONS.
NOTE.
AlL POWER AND TELEPHONE UTILITIES REQUIRED FOR SITE SERVICE ARE LOCATED
WITHIN THE EXISTING PARCELS.
GENERAL NOTES
·
i!
·
<
~
g
0
0
l
~
{
"
~
<
5J.
ß
;:
·
~
·
.,
0
J
Ë
·
'i
",
·
õ
~
<
5J.
¡
~
,
¡
",
õ
~
~
0
<
5J.
5J.
;:
EDGE OF PAVEt.4ENT
-E E-
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
-X-X-x-
FENCE LINE
tJ RRE HYDRANi
t.4ANHOLE
LEGEND
@
>:1-
if
NOHUMEHT
®
6.
LIGHT POLE
o mEE
e,p JOINT
<'OlE
þP POWER
,,"-'
Phil Auer
Survevin.
1<H07 Corle LeJOIf,
Bakersfield, CA 93314
Phone: (661J 567-6129
E_~~els5&~~~e~.~el
~~~~PEDI____________.____
PRQPERTY LINE
ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
"'SL.
ACL.
OCP
eTP TELEPHOHE
POLE
60
PG
342
BK
A,P"N
.ABDVE GROUND l£VEl
.FlElD CONTROL POINT
SPOT
ELEVAT1QN
.
a_'Z4.5"
~ .
VeTlZQlJwlreless
~~
=~-
MMnCIIŒX.ca._
FOOTHILL & McCLELLAN
·161556
10110 CALlFORNL'. OAK WAY
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
APPROVALS
LEASING: DATE=-
ZONING: DATE=-
Rf'£NGlN££R: DATE~
CONSTRUCTION: DATE:_
EGUIP. [HGR: DATE:_
OWNER: CA'
NOTES:
TIllE REPORi WAS AVAILABLE AT TIr.lE or FlELO SURVEY. THIS IS
NOT A BOUNOARY SURVEY. THIS IS A SPEClAUZED TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY IoIAP ¥11TH
PROPERTY LINES AND EASEr.lENiS BEING A GRAPHIC DEPIC110N OF VARIOUS
INFORr.lAT1ON GATHERED FRQU PRElIt.4INARY TITlE REPORTS OR PROPERTY HISTORY
RtPORTS. BACK-UP DOCUMENTS OF RECORD, MAPS AND AVAIlABLE IoIQNUIoIENiS
FOUND DURING lHE FIELD SUR\r£Y. NO PROPERTY 1oI000MENTS WERE SET.
UNLESS OlHERWlS( NOlED, NO UNDERGROUND UT1l1TY lDCAl1NG SERVICE COt.4PANY
WAS CONTAClED PRIOR TO THIS t.4AP BEING PREPARED; THEREFORE, THERE MAY BE
NON-'dSlBLE OR OBSCURE UTIUl1ES EXISTING ON "THE PROPERTY NOT SHOWN ON
THIS UAP.
SUB.Æ:CT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA ClARA. BEING THE LANDS
DELINEAlED IN THAT CERTAIN RECORD OF SURVEY ENTITlED "RECORD OF SURVEY
OF A PARCEL OF LA~ IN RANCHO SAN ANTONIO ~IoIESA¿. BEING IN THE N.W. ~4
or SEC. 1S & N.E. 1 4 OF SEC. 16, T. 7 So, R.2 .1oI.D..&: t.4'". PER RECORD
SURVEY THEREOf RE ORDED AUGUST 18, 1976, IN BOOK 376 OF RECORD OF
SURVEYS AT PAGE 47, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS.
l£ASE AREA DESCI'!Pl1ON (PARCEL A):
~~~Tha~E~k~~~~k~?~\!L~~r~f1~9r FE~ M~ Yf~TlAJt.D¡E~~~
NING: ENCE SOUTH 44-'6'19' \lÆST 20.00 FEET: THENCE NORTH 45'43'41" \lÆST
30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44-'6"9' EAST 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45"43'41"
EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT Of" BEGINNING.
CONTAlNINC 600 SQUARE FEET WORE OR l£SS.
TOCETHtR WITH A PRoPOSED 12 FOOT WIDE ACCESS [A.SE~ENT AS GENERALlY
SHO\llt.l HEREON.
TOGETHER WITH PROPOSED 5 FOOT WIDE AND 6 FOOT WIDE Ul1L1TY EASEMENTS AS
GENERAlLY SHOWN HEREON.
BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: NGv[) 29 CATUM.
BASIS OF BEARINGS: 281 1.1. 10, SANTA Q.ARA COUNTY RECORDS.
PRO..ECT BENCH: AS SHOWN ON SHEET 2 OF 2.
OWNER'S INFORIoIATION: PAClRC GAS 4c EL£CTRIC COMPANY
77 SEAl£ ST.
SAN FRANaSCO, CA 94106
A..P.N. 342-63-001 (PORTION)
NET AREA OF:
UNDERLYING PARCEl(S): 42.61:i: At. LEASEAREA;~.
flOOD PLAIN ELEVAl1QN Of LEASf: AREA IN ZONE D. AN AREA OF UNOElERMINED, '
BUT POSSIBLE. FLOOD HAZARDS, AS SHO\llt.l ON FtUA FIRM IoIAP COMMUNITY-PANEL!
NU!.IBER 06DJ3702050, DAlEO AUGUST 2. 1982-
FAA 1A CERT1F1CATlON:
LATlTUOE AND lONGl1\IÐE WAS OBT....NED FRot.I INFQRIoIAl1ON PROVIDED BY A GPS
SURVEY. lHE GEODETIC POSITION SHOWN WÞS OElERMINED Ul1l1ZING FAST-STATIC
GPS OBSf:RVATlONS FROM USGS MONU~ENTS USING TRft.4BLE 46OO1.S
RECEIVERS. THE DATA WAS DIFFERENTIAlLY CORRECTED WITH TRIUBLE GPS
SURVEY SOFTWARE.
LATJTUDE ANO LONGITUDE DENOlED ON THIS PlAN ARE ACCURAlE TO WITHIN
15:1: FEET HORIZONTAlLY AND THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THS PlAN ARE
ACCURAlE TO WlTHfN 3:i: FEET VERl1CAlLY.
ELEVATION OF GROUND AT GPS POINT: 425.2' AMSL
STRUCTIJRE HEIGHT: TOP or (E) TOWER/EL..S07.2' A~SL/HT..82.0' ACt
LAl1TUDE: 37'19'30.24" LATITlJOE: 37,9'30.03"
lONGITUDE: 122"04'26.52" (NAD 27) LDNGlTlJD£: 122"04'30.38' (/oIAD 83)
,//
/
/
/ ,/
/ /
/ /
l/6" Ol';/l
/ þ. 0/
.o'~"//
l'/"¡' ø~o'
/ q"t(J- / /-'
~ ^or I '/fJoo'
I~- $/#"
.',_"" r ~./
I', 0-" '. I ~/ <:/
,_ A .1' ~.
?'/~ ,_ '\ -ò/ Y"/'
or ~'\ I .IF
J-- _ ~,!, /
,~.r /
- /
:: -. ~v!'
/ "
/ /
è,i /
<b'X~ /
A~^ I
,/ /
- / / /
- . /
-- . / /
-_/ / /
-<---_ '" "'0'.>7 // ..
N~-'" ,"""'"'' D.'m'DO'} // /
D,5'¡¡-- -L- 55.50' L_""'" ,,/ /'
\-- ----- ----' ,,/ ..---.
L ---------------
S45"53'J5.W PRoPERTY WE
2.24'
OI1_PhUipAuer
L5. 5075
Expires 06/30/07
,..
08/22/05
GRAPHIC SCA1.t 1".100'
~
,"0 'DO ""
BK 342 PG 62 I SURVEYED BY/OR UNDER THE DlRECl1QN OF:
/
/
/
.'\
. \
/ \
/ \
" \'D,
/ ~~.
/ .,jí-..
1;>,),('"
.' \
/ \ /\
/ '. #~/ \
.' "4' \
/ ~;.q -#~1o'iP \
/' I"..;>~..~,,#.... \
·6'"."e,./ ,
' ~ \
.,/ ,
"z ,
~ \
~ \
' '.
' ~
/ ~
' . ~
' / ~
". ,r/ \.
' ¥ ~
,~ ,
~ ~
/ ~
' \
/.. '.
.. \
/ ~~'
CORNER
/ (~R.S.~
.
\
\
i
,
\
i
.
i
\
.
~\~
';'<JI
<JI't.
<&]<".
£\
\
\
DAlE Of SURVEY:
o
A.P.N
61556
DPA
DPA
TCN
L1 08/23/05 ISSUED FOR
90" REV.
& 09/02/05 ISSUED FOR
REV. #1
& 09/06/05 ISSUED FOR
REV. #2
ð 09/06/05 ISSUED FOR
REV. 63
NOT TO SCALE
SHEET TITLE
~
,"'''""0 + SURVEY
SHEET NU~BER
I S"Œ1,=
"''''
ICOMPANY JOB NO. CA02421
SITE NO
APPROVED BY
CHECKED
BY
DRAWN BY
MAP
\1CINITY
CALIFORNIA-
OAK WAY
TRACT 6551
(PER 449101. 24)
.
i
o
i
.
!
I-TT-----
: "I
1 >- '
,~I
, ,
I ",I
: <X: I
10'
o !
o :c '
1 V1 I
0_,
, ...Jo
1 '-'I
'Z,
¡WI
,) 1
r~ I :
!Jj;1t- GAlE ___________________-'. !
W;'.!!i------ ______ _._._.___' /
i~D,,><,Ay ~-----------"
í( ~JF---T· ~-----MAJESTIC OAK WY.
. ~<:P'
¡¡I
: , IPP
! ! :
~
'..100'
1
J2
PG.
TRACT 48Z4
(PER 281 101. 10)
342-IZ-030
,.,
BK.
~)
#2
2)
A,P.N.
CENlERUNE
Of" PROPOSED
12' WIDE \/ERIZCH
WlREL£SS ACCESS
ðt 5' WIDE UTlUTY
EASEMENTS
SEE
P.O.C. OETAIL
(SHEET 2 OF
A..P.N.
SOO"01·1ïw·
237,97'
"
CALIFORNIA
OAK WAY
PC.
,
BK.
A.P.N.
342-63-001
(376R.S.47)
2)
SEE
SITE MAP
(SHEET 2 OF
A.P,N
342-63-002
\
i
.
.i
>0
<¡.
~\
~\
i
o
)
//'
/
/
A...l
r.~
~,'
...:Y'~'ò"
/
MAP
SITE
A,P.N
OVERALL
Phil Auer
Surveying
14407 Corte Ù! OIl,
Bakersfield, CA 93314
Phone: (G61J 587-6129
E_~a'iP:eis5~~~I!~r::.~el
APPROVAlS
DATE=-
DATE=---
DATE=---
DATE=-
DATE=---
DATE:
Y:' .
VeTl70nwlreless
-~
~~-
WUI.II'-'CA_
FOOTHILL & McCLELlAN
161556
10110 CALlFORNl'I OAK WAY
CUPERTINO. CA 95014
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
NOT TO SCALE
,."..
"..
".
El_S01.G' A~SL
HT_76.4' AGl
"'.
EL-482.3' AMSl
HT=:l7.1' AGL
< PT OF TOWER
EL_477.2' AIdSl..
HT"S2.0'AGL
""
EL.,492.4'
HT_67.2'
TOWER ELEVATION
(E¿&.fW~A
EL-45J.2' N.lSL
HT..28.0' AGL
4.6' HIGH
61556
0"
TCN
OPA
ISSUED FOR
90::1; REV.
ISSUED FOR
REV. /11
SSUED FOR
REV. 12
ISSUED FOR
REV. #3
lEASING:
ZONING:
RrEHCIHEER:
CONSTRUCnOH:
[OUIP. EMGR:
OWNER:
SITE NO
APPROVED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
~ 08/23/05
&. 09/02/05¡
6 09/06/051
b. 09/06/05
GROUND
(1.-425.2' AloiSI.
P.C..,.~
""LT V
.
..,~
..,c~·
"'.....'"
'o~
SCAI..£:
'"-10'
1
".
JO
,"-
20
jJ
SO"",
GRAPHIC
"
"
,
INTt:RVAL
J~~1ro'w~
HT-Z.9/GL
."
PRO..l:CT BENCH
..X" ON TOP or FOOTING
EL=420.2' At.ISL
CONTOUR
GENERATOR ~'
CONNECTION/I.'
PANE!,."/
...-,rfÓP OF' WALL
/ EL":\~.~~Sl \/
"
<PT./
OF /"J).ú.
6
CUT
l/ERIZON WIRELESS
NON-EXCLUSIVE 9' X 14'
EASEt.lENT FOR USE OF
TD.IPORARY Et.IERGENCY
GENERATOR PARKING
SITE MAP
PROPOSED
20'X30' VERIZON
WIRELESS
LEASE AREA
(PARCEL A)
TIT\..E
SHEET
UNKNOWN
VAULT
HYDRANT
ÖFlRE
t.lANHOlL
SURVEY
NUMBER
CA0242'
C-2
SHEET 2 OF 2
JOB NO.
ElECTRICAl~
VAUlT
EDGE OF PA\lEt.lEHT
-E E~
OVERHEAD ELEClRlC UNE
-X-X-x-
FENCE UN(
t.lQNUIdEN
LIGHT POlL I®
HANDlCAPPE,
PARKING
6
TREE
~
-¢-
()
...
m,
j
I
j
I
j
i
¡
p
<
p
~.
.~
.w
pU
NU
<
~
~
CENlERUNE
OF PROPOSED I
' 2' WlD£ \'ERIZON I 'I
Yt1RELESS ACCESS
&; 5' Vv1DE UTlUTY I '
EASE"ENTS I:; 1
I'"
CENTERUNE I I-!
OF PROPOSED I I
5' WIDE VERIZON
YltRElESS Ul1UTY I I'
EASE"ENT I'~ I
J ,"
E. ""::>,'36:W ·'::¡·~~I
,.-.1 --,'~ T 1 i~ I
,p
I !§I
I! I I
II
L..L_L
342-63-001
(J76R.S.47)
A,P.N
p
<
p
w'
p.
'Ô
~~
~
~
" ",-
'16'19"W' ~ ".t. :.. , .
"".00'. '-'. ~"IIIf.'b'.'
Jjß~ -~, .... '.'b!-' II'
. '''';.- -r----<P....~ /1 "....~ '
' '-"i'!:._" >Ii -=,0," '1.~/1" V
' J....~ . " ,("-<;' ~/
\ ~ - <I' ,:,~, '/
\ , ..Ii' ....\>.-Q'i., ,'"
\ ,"& ""'\>,,,
\ ,: . '.>'. 'ý"~. OW""'>
\ RUNE! ~~t ^ /. ~L..4JI.7
. AibeOSEO I Jj ,f,'R'-... '>:' < .
\ 6' "0' VER'Z~ j" '1I., e', '-:X/ /
)/. RELESSt.I~N~U /~X8CKER};/:1~'Íx.'''-'''''''''''"'' '\. / /
.. . EASE / '/J' r·· 'y'''' /v '
// / / ·r.o'r·~l,· -....... / '...." / /
I ".. .0, " '...., ,.
..(. .~'" "~/ -' ,-t \ ',\,'" I / "'v~.~.<,. /
GR~N~S.&ri~~~/ -~ / I ~: V ,~Š< I .
GOES INTO GR PfW dE VERIZON / ~/ :'\--'''~c )<, <., -....... .... / /
' , "~'- '. "~_"^. :
>I {$ Yt1RfELE~~EN T ~. ' , <t\ / '" VAUL~' "~,"LT '>.... '',: ..... 'f" P. ß. ,
. .EA 1"50 '\\"'1 ~ ...., .....,....., 'LA""" .n ,
. m> I ¡ // \,;,;¡, : ,. 'i . I ¡ ^' )'<::;,,-~ /,(~;~\:~: V ~
-, -, . " , , .., '.', , '-. ""-"
'f'''"LT,/ \. _+---~". ~,.";., ~,,/ ~ ,. / ,,;,_' ~, "II~III~ ,
I/' ''-- ~"~·~f"" ~'-< '" / _" \' , '~S .<
' , ~^"A"'", _, '. . " _
:, / ~, ~.,. "" /--r-: , "\\ \ \ '\ /
. / ~"'. . . , . ""'" .
/ \ // CENTERUOSED" ""," ...... 'V, " , , , "". "\\ /
". - ~ .~,~,. .' ", " , '"'' .
(/ ,<> /"?!... ~". , ",,!.' "PS ,/ ! I \ \ \, \, \'\ /'
/. '~ , , . , "" ~ -" , , , " , .
.. / , , ',-, '-.., , , , " " ,
\ ~ . , '" ~'¡ "'~m., I I', ^ ~ '\ " ,
\'" / ""''''' ~"~ '~'" '-1-"1, ! ; i ) I ) \
Y (m""'" '".... -........-;,.¡z.." ~.......... \ f / ; t' ¡ ¡ ! // /
""" '" -....... ""ê I, ~ / / / /
/ ~.." ',,> ,~.....¡ i / ¡ / //,
"".... -........... " -......., ~''''' I I 1/ ";JL'
' .............:,,,> '~:L ! ,I /
"'-.. -....... ............... ~~ / /
" '-......................~"-
~.....:,.......,'--..-.......".
,..............,,,-.......,
""~' '-....'."
-......." ...."\
·'c'''" ~,.....,
A~'oESS '''' "..... .....:,.......,'--.. ;-........."'.
......... '-.... ......."".0. '-
J~;¡¡;'~~O .......... '--..'~~" '."
2' "DE "RIZ~ '-.... ..... ........ '-.... ''',-
:'R'~~EA~h '" " ........ '-.... ""'-
.. SEASEMENTS -........ '-.... '....... -....... . "-
,,'-...., -....... ......
'" '-..........., '-...."'~
......... '-.... ............... '-.... .....
~-......., '-.........
" , " " '" / - -" ~
........... '-.... ........ -....... ' /. ~- ---- ........
' ',.. ~-,,-- -:~/ -- ,-,,~, ,
" '-.......... ........ " ---- ------==- - --- ,--- ....... ....
' ,,, "" -- / -- .. . ~
......... ................ --- ---- - - - :;;-~---. --- - .......'%-~
.... .... ~·".Oo· o."""'LL._ --- ___ ~_ ........ ,c¡;,~.
,- ~ --- ~.~._. --- --- ~ " ,'0,.
'0.~.... -.." _ -""-c,,, ___ ./ >00' ~
~ --- - - ../ c~;g"",7"
, --- - - ".1 L-28.48
'..... "
'.",.
PACBELL\
VAULT b
SLIDING GATE
I.,
I ~!
I!
I
i~1
,N
1~1
i~1
tl
I
I I
I I
-.I
CENlERUNE
OF PROPOSED
12' WIDE VERIZON
YltRELESS ACCESS
& 5' WIDE UT1UTY
EASEMENTS
N89-S6'3B·W·
15.D6'
CENlERUNE
OF PROPOSED
5' ~DE VERlZON
'MRELESS UT1UTY
EASEIdEN T
~i
¡
I
i
___________a_____
PROPERTYUNE
.ABDVE t.lEAN SEA LEVEl
.ABOVE GROUND LEVEL
FIELD CONTROL POINT
AUSl...
AGL.n
o CP I..
TDif'HONE
'01.,
SPOT
ELEVATION
.'"
+
a·'2'1.:J"
"'''
POl.E
POWER
POl.E
LEGEND
.pp
3
01~,
#2
DETAIL
P.O.C.
2
01 s;::,
#1
DETAIL
P.O.C.
APPROVAlS
DAlI_
_DATE_
.DAlIo_
DATE:_
DAlI_
DATE:.
-
61556
-
MS
IN
-
MS
-
~
ZD REVIEW
ZD SUBMITTAl
CITY COMMENTS
WAY
!~i~
~¡;~::¡:
.:!!,c;:¡i!
1íi¡¡¡Q
¡¡;;;:~~
g~~~
~ 1.
SHEET TITLE
SITE PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
A-1
COMPANY JOB NO. CA0242
~
Vert70nwire/es
'ÆltllCIH"'A£l.ESS
2JaliMrfCHELLD!IVt
WAl.N\1TCIIEEK. co. ~~~
~;¡¡8
}.~~
~ð"
:.....
"!II';;;;;
~H
~ ...
FOOTHILL & McCLELLAN
SITE NO. 161556
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
l
I
I
I
~
~
t!
~ 09/06/05
2 09/19/05
3 11/11/05
SITE NO
APPROVED BY
DRAWN BY
LEASING:
ZONING:
RrENGINEER:
CONSTRUClION:
EQUIP. ENGR:
OWNER:
J~
$"~'/
fit'Ó/
,.#/
~/.
/
I
\
\~
~ q,
\ ~
\ "
,-
\
\
\
\
, ,
\ ~gfi i~
t..!¡ \ o~ b&
It \ ~ '" ;d,1:l
') CON"'''' .""- ;", \ -5 ,~
~-- \:j \ ~s iii~
- . , ,;-- '" ""UN ""LT \ ~~~~~:~~~Ü-=ª~ ~~~~~~-=_ ;.-=?-:;_< _
--=-i~· -'""'''-.-:', l~~~ê'=-.o~-~------:~.....,J;5..c--=-=---=-=-='",4=.==:c.=~_============ ====-"'''''-~':'
< C-c~~ cè:5 'c 'C,:;,':, ,1"- '^1t :":':0'. ,~ /,I/I[ "! '- -_ _ _ _ ~-":,:,'Z;~"
\;O;:'OI":Ó:',:,ccc:cc:-.::oor"".:;. -, 1.\ " ~,<)""" ",,,,,,,,,,~þ ',/'/) :.~ \ -./1 """~''';'.''. ,
<> " ~IC,~ ~"': , _ 'I ~" ' , _',' I>"~ ,. , " "."'"
·:<.-..-n , "", '" ~/"_'" '''''''.,
-.::~: ..:.1>~____",- 1tl.. I h.' )wr \ ". ----=----~_.ç..........~ 'I' \ "''''''I'''~ '."",','"C
- -·t I I ,Lj', ' ,,1, ~- / ~ . VAULT ',"\. "\" ~\:
,~ ~ , ',"" -", , '_:-n --~-. _n ~~= --, c', ',,' .'
r:\.. '+~ '--. , , ~",,----,', ~, l'~";--'!...c.~=~-~-=.-=-~=-~-=- =-__\ '\, '." " 'E) '''' \ , ~~:¡"',\'\
""', '·iffY-!., ':"c~>_~Oë,,'~n- '" ! "" 'd""",','"
I ,,",,~ - ß=.=._- ,<) """ PO, a:: ~stC'r~ J 'I \ 6:ø:. '''~'~''''\''
- .... " '''-". - " .., '" ,'" ','W,',
,.-- ",. ,.~" .- O. f" .. """,
,,,,,,..=<. y", , ",- " !, '" ""'-'i'""
---.,.. ",0 -, ,. ,,_, I ,y~(',..,~,\.'y,
i\ ""'1," / ","'oo"",, ~"'''''''' \ \ -.// "\.,.:::-,,'....'~+,
", "', j! : \ ". ,,""~::-,
(E)ElECTRICALf~ ;-J_3 \ \ <"'i'\.\.(" GATE
-, ,. '<C' "".,- , ''',''.'" 'f ,
'. 'm~-__ 'I "'""',/
x ~ i~ \, ") ''''''''''' " ,".,', 'c. ,
../ . " '.,_.. '." "'. ,
'" "'oo "" ) I ""'" """ """" ',. , /
-. "" I, _._, ~""",'" ,_, .. /. .
¡: , " """",.,., .' ',,-,'
¡-i-j '\ , ','"" ", , / ~~'/""
' , , , , """N" / ,/ ,~ .. "
'I I " ,),> ',"\ " -' /.,fi' " /
' y/V "/' .' ..
' . /~Y\', Y'" '/' " /
'\ \ J ~,~.¡/ ") '.,¡ , / "
\ \ y.\~,,'ÆW" i/ ! .I
I , -'Ii
(E)TtLCOPOLE-:/ ' ,_ ",~'.
(TELCO P.D.C.) ,/ '"', ("-, '\ '.
/ "'-, \ "'- '" "
'" """" "", \\ '\, "'... '\. ",
/ '.', ... " '.
' \~' '\. .I?.., '..:. .
/ "', 0.. "
. . ~ '\. ..,... ~ ...,
/ \. " '
' . "'-
/ "'-, '",-
./ "'- ,
. , '
/ .
' "'-
/ ,
' "'-
"'-
"
,/
"
eo,
'"
A.P.N.BK.
34:1.-12-030
.....P.N.
/
./
./
/
>:>+"'/
'Ó '
&~/
oF'
€'/
/
,
---1
VAULT
eo",
'"
~,'.'
~
I
¡
I
\
SITE PLAN
SCALE: I".. 30'-0·
\
g
i
.
g
ñ
,
~
n
p
1
!
!
j
i
\
i
>
.
"
"
¡,
o
§
\
\
ì
\
ì
1"
~,
~ )
~\
~
\~
ACPAVEt.lENT
V¡\ULT
eo",
;toft';?
¿p ,
;>
"
,
VERIZON
WIRElESS
ANTENNA
PLAN
~
~
"
::H2-6J-OOI
A.P.N.
...-------¡
~~~
--
,
"
VERlZGI
WIRELESS
EOUIPI.IENT
SHELTER
·
o
1
~
~
d
s
<
~
s
..
,
<:
~
o
¡
]
·
~
õ
-,
~
~
~
¡
'-
~
¡
",
8
,
~
~
~
~
·
·
~
~
n
·
,;
, hi
"
~I
~ ~ I 1111 I!!!
o. J'
110 LL
" .
~
~:~onwireless
21& 'OITCIIEI.L ÐRM
""'-MITCllŒK..CA94508
FOOTHILL &. McCLELLAN
SITE NO. 161556
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
APPROVALS
\jlEASING: OATE:_
\ ZQMNG: DATE:_
Rf ENGINEER: DATE:_
CONSTRUCTION: OAT£: -
EQUIP. ENGR: DATE:_
OWNER; OATE:_
ISITE NO 161556
IAPPROVED BY MS
I DRAWN BY IN
I CHECKED BY MS
N'" "ATE ISSUe
~ 09/06/05 ZD REVIEW
09/19/05 ZD SUBMITTAL
11/11/05 CITY COMMENTS
SHEET TITLE
SHELTER AREA &
ANTENNA PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
A-2
-
COMPANY JOB NO. CA0242
1~.
-
_f-l
\...1'~
='
t,~ I
~~! I
20';"'0· \/ERIZON 'ft1RELESS LEASE ARt...
SUR'v'E)f SHEET 2 or 2 FOR LEAS[ AREA lOCATI~
,
,
- -
,
- -
"
.
"
,
,.,
.,
j
.,
"
-,
.'!!iII
..!"
"
"7 SEE
)
~
ili
(1'1) WAVEGUIDE
"'"
3'''::~t
"
\
I .
ì -.
:J
, I
I
I
I . . _:,
: 1 [, ~J
1 ,
I ....--..::.r........,......
/ [7 I..... __
r /: L....--'----' !
I I
'I' I
L _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
\ -.,oE
\ (1'1) ~·-¿,sE¡,tE!.fr
lnuJ1Y
,
--
HVAC
,
HVAC
'N
.
(N) DISCONNECT
SWITCH
I
1,-
\
,
.
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
OOOR
(N) 11'-6". 20'-0·
\/ERIZON'Mf!EL£SS
EOUIPIdENTSHELTER
TELCO BOX
(N)TOf' OF" SLAB
ELEVAT1ON: 432'-6" AIdSI
(N)EIdERGENCY
GENERATOR
RECEPTAQ.E
-A----A
- -
- -
-
,------
I
I
I
I
I
1-'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
t¡1f ~ \
.,: I' ".
<-i' "v "-
,
"
-------~ ,
---~,,~-~_...~-~.=-
~- -"-. "
''..
;:,
~\01
",\"'"
'Ó.
,
'c.
E)TO~FOOT1NG
(N)VERIZONI'o'IRELESS
GPSANTENNAS
@
,
/---"'.1----
,'I> I (N) PG&£:
I
1---
r
.
'".
o
,
'"
'"
I
J---_
I
I
.c
"
:~'~/-
,-
'..,'~/
/~.'--. J,_/~/_.G,.>c:_,.~j·
.
~
b ;1
tj
.~
~
~
.
~
"
,
g
ffi
CUtJB1NG
(E)SPRINTPCS
PANELA.NTENNA,
(TYP.OF2)
{N)VERlZ{J-;'MREL£SS
PANEL ANTENNAS
(' SECTORS, 2 ANTtNNAS
PER SECTOR)
,
CINGUlAR ANTENNAS
(N) TOP HAT
EXTENSION
~,
Az ... ISO" ;?
-i'"
: LEG
"
'~.,
./ .
,
16"-0"
/
--~-~\~?l:
_I' - __
/' \ ,'---- /
' \j\\;;~:~:~-:;17
/
L
\: X
o
z
c
ê
;
g
w
o
,
;,
'~
1
-, \
.
\
~~ -
~ --
/ )/;;
/' ~ ~
.... ~ 1'ft~t<3'_···
--f-'\ \~3.~'b
-- ~~. ;.
-" -
/
-,
./ ~i5
.~
b!;2
,-
!:<E
g~
,
,
í
.
\
~:\-
\
\
,---:."'.----
T·
I
\
m
~
(N) VER¡ZON 'MRElESS
NON-EXQUSlVE 9'.14'
TEr.tpœARYEIdERGENCY
GENERATOR PARKING
SHEL TEA PLAN
SCALE: 3/6"· 1'-0'
__-í-
1
\
JV
.
\
\
I
,
TO (N) ANTENiAS
UOUNTED ON
E) PC&( LATTlCE TOYoUl
_.-
---~,,---
\
\
/
---
/'
---
/
/
/
/
ê
~
ANTENNA PLAN
SCALE: 1/2'.1'-0"
/
/
/
/
_---J
--
--~---
2
---
--
-_--:-
o
.,
~
,
·
~
·
o
l
~
·
·
~
~
>'
C
~
~
i
d
~
õ
u,
·
Õ
~
~
>'
¡
i
~
¡
~
~
·
iJ
·
>'
>'
;:
-
? ///
/'
"
, I~ I
' 1\ I
.'" \. \
~ \1
-.--" '~I
.~---- <\ I
\ ----~..;;" \
' - ,
,
--:..---.. \
\ --------.. 'xo\j-,\
------~-- ø<,,, "
\ -- ~ !
¿ \ ,./
/ '--, )
/ \ -- /
/ / /
/ '/ /
/ \, / /
/ \ / /
/ , .
/ Y /
/ /' /
/ / /
/ / /
J . /
- / /
- / /
/
/
.
----'
~.....:,,,-
--,,-
,
\ \
E) aNGULAR ANl'£tmAS\
\:
Ii ;,
í1 /1 Gi)
f ~~
\; , ,
.! ,,','
¡ }, /~{<_...__.
j J¿:~=/
'. i ti--------- -'--.-------.-
, .1
.-----,.-
/
TO PO\'£R ~~
-'= mco
P.O.C.
(E) PCkE LAmCE
roWER
,
,-
~
o
,"
~~
e'
~o.
.'
%~
------
--
.-1.'::-,,--
~<õ8
'::J::;!
!~~
;i~
g.~~
" I!! ~
0_,
. .
"
I
I
~
~
~~~¡;;
~<Ii~:
~lH.~
'á .:!:J...
~ ~;~
:¡:.:!':¡¡~
. .
l
J~
@
(N)VERIZON'ttIRELESS
PANEL ANTENNAS
(3S£CTORS,
2 AHTtNNAS PER SECTOR)
Y:" .
Vefl70nwlrefes
_lON~EILSS
2~MITCHEU._
W.-uN'TCftED(.CAV4i
(N) TOP HAT EXTENSION
L~l~r~_
,
FOOTHILL &. McCLELLAN
SITE NO. 161556
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
._i'
/ç5\
11'··f,I'
~>xj
ff~- _,,",,0>"1\ (E)CINGUlARENo..OSURE
,. """".~" 1¡ WlTHINf£NCEO
,f. .d-""""'-~h. CONCRETE PAD AREA ON (N) VERIZOH V/lREL.(SS
("-,,._' '<-. I; GPS ANTENNA.
~ ~é4' (TTP OF 2)
(r)S?RINTPCS _~_}'!I
EOUIPIoIDH EN~~E ~ - -~ LCE) WOODEN f£NCE
" '\, "
" ¿ \¡ r
, !1 ~ , (N) VERIZON WIRElESS
=,,~.. . ..,,~_m'~' .., HPIHPiP!l'i!P!:TfC-=,.""....-iW, .... ~ ~~ ~~ \, _\,_,1 D' ~"."D "'''';;7
".,. ,.,,,,",'""""""",TJF"""""' ""'''''''''''''''' ,.."," ,,,' 'm' I mTT'·' '"II''' 'I ~
~It~~!~~~c~=:~,~é
WAY
APPROVALS
o.TE,_
_DATE:_
_DAT£:_
DATE:_
DATE_
DATE:.
LEASING:
ZONING:
Rr ENGINEER:
CONSTRUCTION:
EQUIP. EHGR:
OWNER:
(N) VERIZON WlR£1.ESS
EOUIP~ENT SHELTER
TOP OF (N) V£RIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS
94'-0· A.G.L
CENTER Of{N) 'ÆRIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS
92'-0" A.G.L
TOP OF (€) PG&E LATTICE TOWER
82'-0· A.G.L
(E) PG&E INSULATOR AR~
76'-5· A.G.L
(E) PG&£: INSULATOR AR~
67'-2· A.C.L
ro.."
ANTENNA'
(E) SPRt,,¡T PCS
ANTENNAS
PC&[ LATI1CE
ONGlA..AR
,
,
"'.
(E) PG&E INSULATOR
S7'-1· A.G,L
61556
"5
ISSUE
09/06/051 ZD REVIEW
/19/05 ZD SUBMITTAl
/11/05 CITY COMMENTS
TITLE
NORTHEAST ELEVATION
CA0242
"5
IN
SITE NO
Þ-.PPROVED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKEO
A-3
JOB NO.
BY
"~m--.ç..
-i';'i;;'b-~.;¢.
NUMBER
COMPANY
~
~""'~ 2,~~::;;"
:?-,*;;".þ0{; .i.-t,i.f:ò;1.'c:;. ii",;¡'J~~. ;fJ',;:.~~~-
SHEET
SHEET
-_._---~~--~---
i:i:~~ ~~ i:~~ .~--ç.. ~~;;::
-i!'-,-4.w¡;~ ~-\.i't>?;;~ .~~
.-i"!~'h4i":
~-q.:..'-i:Õ:,\~{:
;:!~\~~---;.. i~;¡,~~?;'
~~~
:j-i~~----';"
E) 12"-0· WIDE PAVED ACCESS ROAD
NORTHEAST. ELEV A TIQN
SCALE: 1/8"-1'-0'
II!:i!!I
.~~~~:::;~
i;ç.~~::,. __i;&;:;&.~--;
i.t;,j¡j¡."
-;...
CONCRETE WALL
,
;;
,
<
~
~
"
o
"
~
¡
~
i
o
<
;>
~
..
.
~
~
5
~
.
~
õ
~
o
<
;>
¡
~
,
¡
u
,
~
~
o
<
;>
;>
;:
ANTENNAS
ecs
CENTER Of (E) SPRIN
2S'-10"A.CL
(E) GRADE
0'-0' A.C.L
'§!i
¡.-
iI"'';'
",uJ;:.
:,i§"
ão1'-
H!
~ if
I
I
~
~
l '§.-
I ~.~;
1.""
;;;u~~
~~Rª
:i:i~;
::!c~...
J~
~
Vert70nwireless
DATE_
DATE_
OATE:_
DATE'_
DATE_
DATE:
SUE
REVIEW
SUBMITTAL
COMMENTS
WAY
FOOTHILL & McCLELLAN
SITE NO. 161556
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
61556
MS
MS
IN
1<
~ 09/06/051 ZO
2 09/19/05 ZO
3 11/11/05 CITY
APPROVAlS
DRAWN BY
VEIltZOW""'£l.tss
Z18~ wrrC>£ll OR"'E
W'"-NUT CREE", CA ~~'
APPROVED By
LEASING:
ZONING-
RFENGINEER:
CONSTRUCTION:
EQUIP. ENGR:
OWNER:
SITE NO
(E) OVERHE!\O 1RANS~ISSIQl\ UNI
-~--
(E) 12'-0" WIDE PA\ltO ACCESS ROAD
6B
(N)VERIZONIVIRELESS 6B
PANELAN'fENNAS 4
(3 SECTORS, 12
2 ANTENNAS PER SEGlOR)
{N)TOPHATEXTENSlON
("I) VERIZON WIRELESS
GPSANTENNA
(TVP.Of2)
~",;,.
{N)VERI20t 'MRELES
EQOJIPMENT SHELTER
:';i"J!¿i
,;ß~;,~
::'"":;t;,c;:"'~
-~~.
.",;..,~;¡,~~
,(i;;.-
,¿<iL~
'è·
,
-
þ
-;''-_\i.T-,:.
.
TOPOf(N)VERIZONWlRELESSANTt:NNAS
94'-0" AG.L
CENTER OF (N) \iERIZON WIRELESS AtHE"NA
92'-0"AG.l.
TOP OF (E) PG&E LATTICE TOWER
62'-0"A.G.L
(E) PG&E INSULATOR ARt.!
76;'::5" A.G.L
(E) PG&E INSULATOR ARt.!
67'-:i;'A'-ci.L.-
(E) PG&E INSULATOR ARt.I
57'-1-~·"Ä:"C.L
(E) PC&:£ LATTICE TOWER
(E) ClNGULAR ANTrNNAS
(E)SPRI"TPCS-
ANTt:NNAS
CENTER or (E) SPRINT PCS ANTENNAS
25'-10" A,C.L
(E)CINGULAR-
EOVIPt.4ENT ENCLOSURE
WlTHINFENCEOAREA
ON CONCRETE SLAB
(E) GRADE -
O>-O"A.G.I
(E) CONCI ..,
SHEET TITLE
NORTHWEST ELEV A nON
CA0242
NUMBER
A-4
COMPANY JOB NO.
SHEET
NORTHWEST ELEV A TIQN
SCALE: 1/6"g1'-O"
~
·
·
~
"
·
o
·
,
·
~
·
~I
·
f
..
·
~
<
·
o
,
!
Õ
~I
Õ
i'
/
¡
~
i
,
õ
U
~I
·
G
/
"