Loading...
PC 02-09-2021CITY OF CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA This will be a teleconference meeting with no physical location Tuesday, February 9, 2021 6:45 PM Teleconference Meeting TELECONFERENCE / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION TO HELP STOP THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 In accordance with Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No-29-20, this will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location to help stop the spread of COVID-19. Members of the public wishing to observe the meeting may do so in one of the following ways: 1) Tune to Comcast Channel 26 and AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 on your TV. 2) The meeting will also be streamed live on and online at www.Cupertino.org/youtube and www.Cupertino.org/webcast Members of the public wishing comment on an item on the agenda may do so in the following ways: 1) E-mail comments by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 9th to the Commission at planningcommission@cupertino .org. These e-mail comments will be received by the Commission members before the meeting and posted to the City’s website after the meeting. 2) E-mail comments during the times for public comment during the meeting to the Commission at planningcommission@cupertino.org. The staff liaison will read the emails into the record, and display any attachments on the screen, for up to 3 minutes (subject to the Chair’s discretion to shorten time for public comments). Members of the public that wish to share a document must email planningcommission@cupertino.org prior to speaking. 3) Teleconferencing Instructions Members of the public may observe the teleconference meeting or provide oral public comments as follows: Page 1 Planning Commission Agenda February 9, 2021 Oral public comments will be accepted during the teleconference meeting. Comments may be made during “oral communications” for matters not on the agenda, and during the public comment period for each agenda item . To address the Commission, click on the link below to register in advance and access the meeting: Online Please click the link below to join the webinar : https://cityofcupertino.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_-ad4ImkXRjyhSudS0RvdUw Phone Dial 669-900-6833 and enter Webinar ID: 962 0534 1688 (Type *9 to raise hand to speak) Unregistered participants will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number . Or an H.323/SIP room system: H.323: 162.255.37.11 (US West) 162.255.36.11 (US East) Meeting ID: 962 0534 1688 SIP: 96205341688@zoomcrc.com After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. Please read the following instructions carefully: 1. You can directly download the teleconference software or connect to the meeting in your internet browser. If you are using your browser, make sure you are using a current and up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers, including Internet Explorer . 2. You will be asked to enter an email address and a name, followed by an email with instructions on how to connect to the meeting. Your email address will not be disclosed to the public. If you wish to make an oral public comment but do not wish to provide your name, you may enter “Cupertino Resident” or similar designation. 3. When the Chair calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on “raise hand.” Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. 4. When called, please limit your remarks to the time allotted and the specific agenda topic . Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda February 9, 2021 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this teleconference meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS 1.Subject: Oath of Office for newly-appointed Planning Commission members; training on Commissioner Handbook approved by City Council on January 19, 2021 Recommended Action: That the City Clerk: 1) Conduct Oath of Office for newly-appointed Planning Commission members; and 2) Conduct training on Commissioner Handbook 2021 Commissioner Handbook ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS 2.Subject: Election of Chair, Vice Chair and Committee appointments. Recommended Action: 1) Elect a Chair and Vice Chair of the Planning Commission, assign representatives to various Committees, make a recommendation to the City Council for the Planning Commission representative to the Environmental Review Committee; and 2) Review the upcoming meeting calendar for 2021 Staff Report 1 - Municipal Code Sections 2.86, 2.84 and 2.90 2 - Planning Commission Appointees (blank) 3 - 2020 Planning Commission appointees 4 - 2021 meeting calendar APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3.Subject: Draft Minutes of January 26, 2021 Recommended Action: Approve or modify the Draft Minutes of January 26, 2021 Draft Minutes of January 26, 2021 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission and not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect Page 3 Planning Commission Agenda February 9, 2021 to a matter not on the agenda. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.Subject: Hillside Exception application to consider allowing the construction of an 864 square foot deck expansion on slopes greater than 30% to an existing single family residence. Application No(s).: EXC-2020-007; Applicant(s): Curt Cline (Raifi residence); Location: 22637 San Juan Road APN #342-17-064 Recommended Action: That the Planning Commission adopt the proposed draft resolution to: 1) Find the proposed project exempt from CEQA; and 2) Approve the Hillside Exception Planning Commission decision final unless appealed Staff Report 1 – Draft Resolution for EXC-2020-007 2 – Plan Set OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS ADJOURNMENT If you challenge the action of the Planning Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Cupertino at, or prior to, the public hearing. In the event an action taken by the Planning Commission is deemed objectionable, the matter may be officially appealed to the City Council in writing within fourteen (14) days of the date of the Commission’s decision. Said appeal is filed with the City Clerk (Ordinance 632). In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this teleconference meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available Page 4 Planning Commission Agenda February 9, 2021 in the appropriate alternative format. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission after publication of the packet will be made available for public inspection in the Community Development Department located at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours and in Planning packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the Cupertino web site. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. You are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights you may have on the information provided to the City . Members of the public are entitled to address the Planning Commission concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the Planning Commission on any issue that is on this agenda, please complete a speaker request card located in front of the Commission, and deliver it to the City Staff prior to discussion of the item. When you are called, proceed to the podium and the Chair will recognize you. If you wish to address the Planning Commission on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so by during the public comment portion of the meeting following the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes or less. For questions on any items in the agenda, or for documents related to any of the items on the agenda, contact the Planning Department at (408) 777 3308 or planning@cupertino.org. Page 5 COMMISSIONER’S HANDBOOK 2021 ii WELCOME AND ORIENTATION Welcome and thank you for your willingness to serve as a member of a City of  Cupertino Commission. Advisory bodies play an important role in City governance by  assisting the City Council in addressing specific issues in detail and facilitating  community decision‐making.    The City of Cupertino has a number of advisory bodies, each with distinct  responsibilities. As a new advisory body member, you should familiarize yourself with  the documents governing your particular body including City ordinances, City Council  resolutions, relevant element(s) of the General Plan, and other documents, all available  from your staff liaison. Reviewing these documents will help you get a sense of your  responsibilities.    This Handbook is designed to serve as a reference for the basic protocols that apply  generally to all City advisory bodies. Orientation is necessarily an active process. As a new  member you may want to meet with the Chair of your advisory body to get a better sense  of your role and the business of the body, as well as with the staff liaison assigned to the  body. Along with familiarizing yourself with your advisory body’s foundational  documents, you may want to review agendas and minutes from recent meetings to see  what current issues have been under consideration, as well as the City Work Program to  familiarize yourself with current goals.    Learning your role and developing an effective voice takes time and familiarity.  We hope this Handbook will assist you towards a satisfying and productive experience.  Your participation is deeply appreciated by the City Council, by city staff, and by your  community. The vitality and strength of our community results from the willingness of  people like you to serve.             ________  Darcy Paul, Mayor  City of Cupertino   iii Table of Contents WELCOME AND ORIENTATION ii STRUCTURE OF GOVERNMENT 4 Form of Government 4 City Council 4 City Manager and Staff 4 Commissions 5 COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP 6 Quorum and Attendance 6 Vacancies 6 Resignations and Removals 6 MEETINGS 6 Regular Meetings 6 Adjourned Meetings 6 Special Meetings 7 Subcommittees 7 Agendas 7 Preparation for Meetings 7 Minutes 8 Procedure 8 Decorum at Meetings 8 Basis for your Decision 8 CITY WORK PROGRAM 9 COMMUNICATIONS 9 Staying Informed 9 Use of City Email 10 Resources 10 4 THE STRUCTURE OF GOVERNMENT A. FORM OF GOVERNMENT    The City of Cupertino operates as a general law city with a City Council‐City Manager  form of government where the City Council sets policy and the City Manager manages  the implementation and administration of those policies.     B. CITY COUNCIL    The City Council is the governing legislative body of the City, consisting of five members  elected in odd numbered years to staggered four‐year terms. These councilmembers then  elect the mayor and vice mayor to one‐year terms. It sets goals and priorities and  establishes policies. The Mayor is the presiding officer of the Council, and the official  spokesperson and representative of the City.    C. CITY MANAGER AND STAFF    City Manager  The City Manager has complete responsibility and authority for the administration  of the City’s government. This individual is appointed by and serves at the  pleasure of the Council and is the appointing authority for the City, selecting the  department heads and other employees. The City Manager coordinates and directs  the services of the City staff, and commissioners should not attempt to direct or  prioritize work for departments or individual staff.    City Clerk  The City Clerk plays an important role for advisory bodies. The City Clerk accepts  and maintains applications, processes appointments, updates membership rosters,  bylaws, informational booklets, and yearly attendance records. The City Clerk is  the filing officer for Statements of Economic Interests, and any other required filing  as identified by the City Council and the State.    Staff  When assigned by the City Manager, staff assist and act in a technical advisory  capacity to the commissions. It is not expected that every staff recommendation  will be followed; however, because of the staff’s technical knowledge, full  consideration should be given to their recommendation. Staff are at liberty to make  their recommendation to the City Council through the City Manager, even though  the commission may have taken a different position. However, in these cases, the  commission recommendation will be made clear to the City Council.      Staff Liaison  A staff liaison is assigned to each commission.  Their main duties include  facilitating meetings, preparing agendas, advising commissioners, and writing  5 meeting minutes.  Commissioners should reach out to their liaison if they have any  questions regarding matters of the commission or if they would like to contact  other staff regarding official business.     D. COMMISSIONS    The primary purpose of the City’s commissions is to serve as advisory bodies to Council  by weighing public input and rendering recommendations to the City Council. There are  times when the advisory body’s recommendation will not be sustained or will be modified  by the City Council. It is important to recognize this not as a rejection of the integrity of the  recommendation, but as an inevitable part of the process of community decision‐making.  The Council has appointed commissioners as advisors to them. This underlying  philosophy makes it improper for an individual commissioner, acting in their official  capacity, to try to persuade the Council into the acceptance of a recommendation other  than that voted by the majority of the commission. The role of a commission is to assist the  City Council in the formation of policy, having been created for the purpose of advising.  The scope of work, purpose, and other primary functions for each commission can be  found in the City Municipal Code Chapter 2.     Chair and Vice Chair  Each year, every commission will elect from its membership a Chairperson  (Chair) and a vice Chairperson (Vice Chair) who serve at the pleasure of the  commission for a one‐year term. The Vice Chair acts in this capacity when the  Chair is not available.    The Chair should:    Maintain order of the meeting, ensure respect for all opinions, protect  commissioners, staff, and the public from personal attacks.   Keep discussion focused on the issue at hand.   Solicit opinions from commissioners. Encourage evaluation of new, tentative,  or incomplete ideas. Discourage overly dominant commissioners from  having disproportionate control over the discussion.    Attempt to reach decisions expeditiously on action items. At those times  when action would be premature, guide discussion toward a timeline or  framework for responsible action.   Set meeting rules early and make sure everyone abides by them without  exception.   Set an acceptable time limit for public testimony (generally three minutes per  individual and 10 minutes per group) and stick to it. At the Chairʹs discretion,  the public can interact with the members of the commission beyond the  public‐comment time limit in order to facilitate better communication of the  agendized topic.   Provide periodic written updates, approved by the full body, to Council  regarding the status of their activities at least every six months.    6 COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP A. QUORUM AND ATTENDANCE     A quorum consists of a majority of the members of the commission. A quorum is required  to conduct business at any meeting whether it is a regular, adjourned, or special meeting.  While it is expected that members be present at all meetings, the Chair should be notified  if a member knows in advance that he/she will be absent. A member shall be considered  removed from an advisory body under the following conditions:     A member misses more than three consecutive meetings   A member misses more than 25% of the advisory body’s meetings in  a calendar year (Resolution 10‐048)    B. VACANCIES    Vacancies are filled by appointment by the Council. Appointments made in the middle of  a term are for the unexpired portion of that term. Council‐appointed Alternates will  automatically fill a vacancy.    C. RESIGNATIONS AND REMOVALS    If a member is unable to continue serving because of health, business requirements or  personal reasons, a letter of resignation should be submitted to the City Council.    The position of any member is automatically vacated when the member ceases to meet the  qualifications for office, when Council accepts the member’s resignation, or when the  Council so declares.  MEETINGS A. REGULAR MEETINGS    Commissions are required to hold regular meetings open to the public as provided by the  enabling ordinance. The agenda for this meeting must be posted at least 72 hours prior to  the meeting.    B. ADJOURNED MEETINGS    If the business to be considered at a regular meeting cannot be completed, the commission  then may designate a time and date for an adjourned meeting.       7 C. SPECIAL MEETINGS    A special meeting may be called by the Chair or a majority of the members with  coordination with the staff liaison.    D. SUBCOMMITTEES    The Chair may appoint special subcommittees of less than a quorum of the commission  who then may meet at their convenience to carry out the purpose of the subcommittee. If  the subcommittee has a continuing subject matter or a regularly scheduled meeting time,  it may qualify as a Brown Act committee and public notice provisions will apply.    E. AGENDAS    Each commission has a staff liaison responsible for preparing agendas in consultation  with the Chair. If a commissioner or staff member intends to bring up an item for  discussion or action, the item must be included on the agenda in accordance with the  Brown Act. For each meeting, a date should be scheduled for the Chair and staff liaison to  set the agenda. Commissioners can propose agenda items within the purpose of the  commission to the staff liaison prior to the agenda setting date.     Future Agenda Setting  The staff liaison will maintain a list of future agenda items that the commission  plans to discuss. The Chair, the staff liaison, or any two commissioners can add an  agenda item within their purpose to the future agenda item list and it will be  scheduled at the discretion of the Chair and staff liaison. To provide  commissioners an opportunity to discuss whether to add an item to the future  agenda item list, each regularly‐scheduled agenda will include a “Future Agenda  Setting” item.  Once an item is added to the future agenda item list, it cannot be  removed until it is discussed for removal at a regularly scheduled meeting during  the item for “Future Agenda Setting.” In addition, the item will not be removed if  the Chair or at least two commissioners wish for the item to remain on the future  agenda item list.    Staff Updates and Commissioner Activity Report  Each regularly scheduled agenda will also include a “Staff Updates and  Commissioner Activity Report” item for staff to report on updates and the  members to report any activities they have taken part in related to the commission  since the prior regularly scheduled meeting.    F. PREPARATION FOR MEETINGS     Thoroughly review the agenda packet, including agenda reports, and any other  materials before the meeting. Check if you may have a conflict of interest with any  of the items due to property or monetary interests. If it is unclear, the commissioner  8 can explain the situation to the staff liaison who can seek legal counsel from the  City Attorney. For more information on conflicts of interest, please review the Fair  Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Conflicts of Interest Rules.    Understand what action you are being called upon to take for each particular agenda  item.   Contact the Chair or your staff liaison before the meeting to clarify questions about  the agenda or request further information.   Understand the responsibilities of your commission. As a member of an advisory  body you will be asked to provide recommendations to the City Council about  specific issues. Keep in mind that your appointment does not empower you to  supervise or direct City staff.    G. MINUTES    The approved minutes are placed on file by the City Clerk for public access. Commissions  should strive to keep summary minutes as opposed to action minutes. If automatic  transcription is made available to supplement official minutes, action minutes may be  sufficient.    H. PROCEDURE    Commissions follow the guidelines on parliamentary procedure contained in  Rosenberg’s Rules of Order (Rules). These Rules outline how motions are made and the  basic format for an agenda item discussion.     I. DECORUM AT MEETINGS     Discourage outward signs of agreement or disagreement from the audience such  as cheering or clapping. Such demonstrations can intimidate those wishing to  express alternate views and delay the meeting. Also see Conduct of Members in  the Cupertino Ethics Policy.    Limit your own comments to the issues before the commission. Avoid the  appearance of straying from the subject or ʺgrandstandingʺ.    J. BASIS FOR YOUR DECISION    Commission decisions should be based principally on the information presented to you  in the open public meeting process. If you collect pertinent information outside of the  public process through a meeting with stake holders or site visits, you should share  that information with your fellow commissioners in the public meeting. This sharing of  information will ensure that other commissioners and members of the public have a  better understanding of the rationale for your decision.    Commissioners are free to meet or refuse to meet with residents, resident groups,  9 developers or prospective contractors or any persons outside of the public meeting  process concerning issues before the commission. If you meet with any individuals  outside of the public meeting you should disclose the content of that meeting in the  public meeting to again ensure that everybody is aware of the facts and have similar  information upon which to base their decision; this disclosure is required for quasi‐ judicial matters1.     All governmental procedures and process must follow due process and allow an  affected party a right to be heard, and to present controverting fact or testimony on the  question of right in the matter involved. Unfair determinations, such as bias,  predetermination, refusal to hear, etc., may invalidate actions.     Keep an open mind. An objective, balanced, and receptive approach will help you  assess the facets of a given issue and evaluate new ideas. When receiving written and  oral public testimony it will be necessary to discern between fact and opinion, as well as  between those concerns which are relevant and those which are secondary to the issue  at hand. Keeping an open mind will make it easier for you to understand all sides of an  issue before you make a judgment or take a position.    CITY WORK PROGRAM   The City Council approves an annual City Work Program to guide the work of the City.  Prior to the first draft of the City Work Program each year, staff will reach out to the  commissions to ask for recommendations of items to add. These recommendations will be  provided to the City Council for consideration, but ultimately the City Council will  determine the final items on the City Work Program. Commissions support City Work  Program items within their scope by reviewing the items and making recommendations to  City Council. Since the City Council sets the City Work Program to guide the priority  efforts in the City, commission agendas should be aligned accordingly. By August 15, each  commission should provide an annual report of all of the topics the commission has  addressed in the prior year.  COMMUNICATIONS A. STAYING INFORMED     Commissioners should sign up for City email notifications to stay informed of various  community events and public meetings. Council encourages commissioners to attend at  least two community meetings or meetings of other commissions each year.    The City uses social media outlets, surveys, email notifications, the Scene, and the City  website to perform outreach for City business. For appropriate conduct on social media,  1 More information on quasi‐judicial proceedings can be found in the Imposed Restraints document  in the Commission Resources folder. 10 see the City’s Social Media Policy. For questions about City outreach, speak with your  staff liaison.      B. USE OF CITY EMAIL    All newly appointed City commissioners will be assigned a mandatory City email  address after reviewing and signing the Technology Use Policy.    As noted under the Brown Act, care should be taken with regard to emails. Never select  “Reply All” to an email to all commissioners or forward an email sent to you by one  commissioner to another commissioner since that would constitute a quorum. All  questions and concerns should be directed to the Chair and staff liaison.    All City emails are subject to the Public Records Act and you should use your City email  only to conduct City business as a commissioner. Please do not forward or reply to a City  email from your personal email address. Once your term on the commission is over, your  City email will be terminated.    RESOURCES   Commissioners should familiarize themselves with the following resources:    City policies relating to ethics, social media, commissions, diversity, and technology, as  well as the City organizational chart, a Rosenberg’s Rules of Order cheat sheet, and  guidance on imposed restraints, can be found online in the Commission Resources folder.     League of California Cities   Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, Brown Act, Public Records Act, and other resources    Institute for Local Government  Parliamentary Procedure Simplified  Ethics and Transparency PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Date: February 9, 2021 SUBJECT Appointment of a Chair, Vice Chair and Committee representatives RECOMMENDATION Elect a Chair and Vice Chair Recommend an Environmental Review Committee (ERC) representative Appoint a Design Review Committee (DRC) member and an alternate Appoint a Housing Commission representative Appoint an Economic Development Committee representative Discuss the Hearing Schedule for 2021 BACKGROUND Terms The terms of office of the Chair, Vice Chair and Design Review Committee members are for one year and end in January of each year. DISCUSSION Chair and Vice Chair: The selection of the Chair typically is the Vice Chair, who was R Wang (re-appointed in January 2021, second term ends 2025). The selection of the new Vice Chair typically is based on seniority and rotation. The following Commissioners are listed below based on seniority and rotation: 1. Vikram Saxena – appointed in January 2019 (first term ends 2023) 2. Sanjiv Kapil – appointed December 2020 (first term ends January 2023) 3. Steven Scharf – appointed January 2021 (first term ends January 2025) 4. Muni Madhdhipatla – appointed January 2021 (first term ends January 2025) Environmental Review Committee Typically, the City Council reviews the staff members of ERC annually. Historically, the Planning Commission recommends its Chair to serve on the Environmental Review Committee. The Planning Commission’s recommended ERC member will be reviewed and formally appointed by the City Council. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333 Design Review Committee The Municipal Code provides that the Vice Chair of the Planning Commission is the Chair of the Design Review Committee, so only one member and an alternate need to be appointed. Housing Commission The Planning Commission sends a representative to the Housing Commission to provide better communication between the Commissions. The Planning Commissioner is not a voting member and there is no term of office. New appointments occur from time-to-time; the same representative may be re-appointed or a new representative may be selected. Usually the selection is determined by the level of interest of a particular Planning Commissioner. Economic Development Committee Each year, the Planning Commission sends a representative to the Economic Development Committee to help enhance awareness and communication with the business community. The Economic Development Committee is an ad hoc committee. There are no term limits, the same representative may be re -appointed or a new representative may be selected. ______________________________________________________________________________ Prepared by: Beth Ebben, Deputy Board Clerk Approved by: Albert Salvador, Acting Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS: 1 - Planning Commission Committee Appointees (blank) 2 - 2020 Committee Appointments 3 - Tentative 2021 Planning Commission Hearing Calendar PLANNING COMMISSION COMMITTEE APPOINTEES updated 2/09/21 Planning Commission Meeting / 2nd & 4th Tuesday, 6:45 p.m. – Chair – Vice Chair R “Ray” Wang – Commissioner Vikram Saxena – Commissioner Steven Scharf – Commissioner Sanjiv Kapil – Commissioner Muni Madhdhipatla - Commissioner Environmental Review Committee / 1st & 3rd Thursday, 9:30 a.m., Conference Room C – representative – alternate (City Council representatives: Moore and Wei) Design Review Committee / 1st & 3rd Thursday, 5:00 p.m., Conference Room C - Chair - Commissioner - alternate Housing Commission Meeting / 2nd Thursday, 9:00 a.m., Conference Room C – representative - alternate Economic Development Committee/ Quarterly, 2nd Wednesday, 10:00a.m., Conference Room A (2-10-21, 5-12-21, 8-11-21 and 11-10-21) – representative – alternate (City Council representatives: Paul and Wei) Mayor’s Monthly Meeting/ 2nd Wednesday, 5:00pm, Conference Room A Sanjiv Kapil…January 6th Vikram Saxena…February 10th …March 10th …April 7th …May 12th …June 9th …July 14th …August 11th …September 8th …October 13th …November 10th … December 8th PLANNING COMMISSION COMMITTEE APPOINTEES updated 1/28/20 Planning Commission Meeting / 2nd & 4th Tuesday, 6:45 p.m. Catherine “Kitty” Moore – Chair R “Ray” Wang – Vice Chair Vikram Saxena – Commissioner Alan Takahashi – Commissioner David Fung - Commissioner Environmental Review Committee / 1st & 3rd Thursday, 9:30 a.m., Conference Room C Kitty Moore – representative David Fung – alternate (City Council representatives: Chao and Willey) Design Review Committee / 1st & 3rd Thursday, 5:00 p.m., Conference Room C R Wang - Chair David Fung - Commissioner Vikram Saxena - alternate Housing Commission Meeting / 2nd Thursday, 9:00 a.m., Conference Room C Kitty Moore – representative Vikram Saxena - alternate Economic Development Committee/ Quarterly, 2nd Wednesday, 10:00a.m., Conference Room A (2-12-20, 5-13-20, 8-12-20 and 11-11-20) Alan Takahashi – representative Vikram Saxena – alternate (City Council representatives: Sinks and Chao) Mayor’s Monthly Meeting/ 1st Wednesday, 5:30pm, Conference Room A cancelled…January 1st David Fung…February 5th Vikram Saxena…March 4th Kitty Moore…April 1st Alan Takahashi…May 6th R Wang…June 3rd David Fung…July 1st Vikram Saxena…August 5th Kitty Moore…September 2nd Alan Takahashi…October 7th R Wang…November 4th David Fung… December 2nd ◄ Dec 2020 January 2021 Feb 2021 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 HOLIDAY 2 3 4 5 City Council Meeting 6 7 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 8 9 10 11 12 Planning Commission Meeting 13 14 Housing Commission Meeting 15 16 17 18 HOLIDAY 19 City Council Meeting 20 21 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 22 23 24 25 26 Planning Commission Meeting 27 28 29 30 31 ◄ Jan 2021 February 2021 Mar 2021 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 City Council Meeting 3 4 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 5 6 7 8 9 Planning Commission Meeting 10 11 Housing Commission Meeting 12 13 14 15 HOLIDAY 16 City Council Meeting 17 18 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 19 20 21 22 23 Planning Commission Meeting 24 25 26 27 28 ◄ Feb 2021 March 2021 Apr 2021 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 City Council Meeting 3 4 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 5 6 7 8 9 Planning Commission Meeting 10 11 Housing Commission Meeting 12 13 14 15 16 City Council Meeting 17 18 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 19 20 21 22 23 Planning Commission Meeting 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ◄ Mar 2021 April 2021 May 2021 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 2 3 4 5 6 City Council Meeting 7 8 Housing Commission Meeting 9 10 11 12 13 Planning Commission Meeting 14 15 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 16 17 18 19 20 City Council Meeting 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Planning Commission Meeting 28 29 30 ◄ Apr 2021 May 2021 Jun 2021 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 City Council Meeting 5 6 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 7 8 9 10 11 Planning Commission Meeting 12 13 Housing Commission Meeting 14 15 16 17 18 City Council Meeting 19 20 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 21 22 23 24 25 Planning Commission Meeting 26 27 28 29 30 31 ◄ May 2021 June 2021 Jul 2021 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 City Council Meeting 2 3 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 4 5 6 7 8 Planning Commission Meeting 9 10 Housing Commission Meeting 11 12 13 14 15 City Council Meeting 16 17 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 18 19 20 21 22 Planning Commission Meeting 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ◄ Jun 2021 July 2021 Aug 2021 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 2 3 4 5 HOLIDAY 6 City Council Meeting 7 8 Housing Commission Meeting 9 10 11 12 13 Planning Commission Meeting 14 15 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 16 17 18 19 20 City Council Meeting 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Planning Commission Meeting 28 29 30 31 ◄ Jul 2021 August 2021 Sep 2021 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 City Council Meeting 4 5 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 6 7 8 9 10 Planning Commission Meeting 11 12 Housing Commission Meeting 13 14 15 16 17 City Council Meeting 18 19 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 20 21 22 23 24 Planning Commission Meeting 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ◄ Aug 2021 September 2021 Oct 2021 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 3 4 5 6 HOLIDAY 7 City Council Meeting 8 9 Housing Commission Meeting 10 11 12 13 14 Planning Commission Meeting 15 16 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 17 18 19 20 21 City Council Meeting 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Planning Commission Meeting 29 30 ◄ Sep 2021 October 2021 Nov 2021 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 City Council Meeting 6 7 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 8 9 10 11 12 Planning Commission Meeting 13 14 Housing Commission Meeting 15 16 17 18 19 City Council Meeting 20 21 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 22 23 24 25 26 Planning Commission Meeting 27 28 29 30 31 ◄ Oct 2021 November 2021 Dec 2021 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 City Council Meeting 3 4 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 5 6 7 8 9 Planning Commission Meeting 10 11 HOLIDAY Housing Commission Meeting 12 13 14 15 16 City Council Meeting 17 18 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 19 20 21 22 23 Planning Commission Meeting 24 25 HOLIDAY 26 HOLIDAY 27 28 29 30 ◄ Nov 2021 December 2021 Jan 2022 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 3 4 5 6 7 City Council Meeting 8 9 Housing Commission Meeting 10 11 12 13 14 Planning Commission Meeting 15 16 Design Review Committee Environmental Review Meeting 17 18 19 20 21 City Council Meeting 22 23 HOLIDAY 24 HOLIDAY 25 26 27 City Hall Furlough 28 City Hall Furlough 29 City Hall Furlough 30 HOLIDAY 31 HOLIDAY CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 CITY OF CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ACTION MINUTES, January 26, 2021 At 6:45pm Vice Chair Wang called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting. This was a teleconference meeting with no physical location. ROLL CALL Present: Vice Chair R Wang, Commissioners David Fung, Alan Takahashi, Sanjiv Kapil Absent: Vikram Saxena APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. Subject: Draft Minutes of January 12, 2021. Recommended Action: Approve or modify the Draft Minutes of January 12, 2021 Moved by Fung and seconded by Takahashi to: “Approve the minutes”. The motion carried 4-0-1 (Saxena absent) POSTPONEMENTS: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Jennifer Griffin – spoke about High Density Rezoning in the City of San Jose WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Two emails were received regarding item #3 STUDY SESSION: 2. Subject: Study Session to compare standards for mixed use developments and high density residential guidelines with other cities Recommended Action: Receive presentation and provide any input to Staff Associate Planner, Jeffrey Tsumura, reviewed the comparative study with the Planning Commissioners. He was asked clarifying questions, which he answered. Vice Chair Wang opened the public comment period and the following individual(s) spoke: Jennifer Griffin Vice Chair Wang closed the public comment period. The Commissioners thanked Staff for the study. They commented that some areas of the study were not necessarily “apples to apples” comparisons with other cities specifically in terms of setbacks, building heights and the density housing plan along transit corridors. PUBLIC HEARING: 3. Subject: Consider the modification to an existing Use Permit (U-2004-01) to amend the conditions of approval to allow 100% non-retail commercial uses where only 50% are allowed. Application No(s).: M-2020-002; Applicant(s): Catherine Chen; Location: 20130 Stevens Creek Blvd APN #369-56-001 Recommended Action: That the Planning Commission consider the evidence presented, conduct the public hearing and consider either adopting; 1) the Draft Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Use Permit modification; or 2) The Alternate Draft Resolution recommending that the City Council deny the Use Permit Modification Gian Martire, Senior Planner, reviewed the Staff Report with the Planning Commissioners. He was asked clarifying questions, which he answered. Vice Chair Wang opened the public comment period and the following individual(s) spoke: Jennifer Griffin Rick Kitsen Vice Chair Wang closed the public comment period. The applicant, Catherine Chen, also addressed the Commissioners. She would like to convert the space to non-retail uses for several reasons including the lack of parking. Retail uses require more parking spaces than are available on site. The Commissioners agreed that old legislation and old planning methodologies have contributed to the need for these kinds of exception requests. Moved by Wang and seconded by Fung to: Recommend that the City Council approve the modification to the Use Permit. The motion carried 4-0-1 (Saxena absent) The Planning Commission took a five minute break at 9:00 p.m. 4. Subject: Consider A Municipal Code Amendment as part of the transition from Level of Service (LOS) to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) for determination of transportation impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which is a change required by Senate Bill (SB) 743. Application No(s).: MCA-2021-001; Applicant(s): City of Cupertino; Location: citywide Recommended Action: Conduct the public hearing and recommend that the City Council; 1) find that the proposed action is exempt from CEQA; and 2) Add Title 17 (currently reserved) to the Cupertino Municipal Code for Environmental Regulations and adopt regulations in a new Chapter 17.08: VMT Standards, which establishes screen criteria, a 14.4% VMT reduction threshold, and a qualified exemption for local-serving retail projects, for purposes of CEQA analysis, per the Draft Resolution Chris Corrao, Senior Transit and Transportation Planner in the Public Works Department, reviewed the Staff Report and proposed Ordinance with the Planning Commissioners. He was asked clarifying questions, which he answered. Vice Chair Wang opened the public comment period and the following individual(s) spoke: Jennifer Griffin Vice Chair Wang closed the public comment period. The Commissioners discussed the model with Staff and the Consultant to understand the formulas and metrics. They appreciate that the LOS calculations can still be used to determine potential traffic impacts while using the VMT methodology for CEQA purposes when evaluating a development application. Moved by Fung and seconded by Takahashi to: The Planning Commission hereby finds and declares that each of the recitals and findings are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution and hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Draft Ordinance as attached hereto as Exhibit A, in substantially similar form. The motion carried 4-0-1 (Saxena absent) OLD BUSINESS: 5. Subject: General Plan Annual Review for the year 2020 Recommended Action: That the Planning Commission provide input into the General Plan Annual Report for the City Council Planning Manager Piu Ghosh, reviewed the City Work Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 with the Planning Commissioners. She was asked clarifying questions, which she answered. Vice Chair Wang opened the public comment period and the following individual(s) spoke: Jennifer Griffin Vice Chair Wang closed the public comment period. The Commissioners discussed the changes made to the report from section LU-30.2 to the end of the report. They provided additional comments and suggestions. The report will be submitted to the City Council in March. NEW BUSINESS: None REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Manager, Piu Ghosh, thanked Commissioners Takahashi and Fung for their service on the Planning Commission. She re-stated that the Draft RHNA number has been adopted by the ABAG Executive Board. Cupertino’s Draft RHNA is 4588 units. The RHNA is in draft form until HCD first approves the methodology and the ABAG Executive Board adopts it in final form. Deputy Board Clerk, Beth Ebben, also thanked Commissioners Takahashi and Fung for their service on the Planning Commission. REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Vice Chair Wang thanked Commissioners Takahashi and Fung for their service on the Planning Commission ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 pm. to the next regular Planning Commission meeting on February 9, 2021 at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted: ______/s/Beth Ebben_______________ Beth Ebben, Deputy Board Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting: February 9, 2021 SUBJECT Hillside Exception application to consider allowing the construction of an 864 square foot deck expansion on slopes greater than 30% to an existing hillside residence. (Application No(s).: EXC-2020-007; Applicant(s): Curt Cline (Rifai residence); Location: 22637 San Juan Rd. APN(s): 342-17-064) RECOMMENDED ACTIONS That the Planning Commission adopt the proposed draft resolution (Attachment 1) to: 1. Find the proposed project exempt from CEQA; and 2. Approve the Hillside Exception (EXC-2020-007) DISCUSSION Project Data: General Plan Designation: Very Low Density (1/2 Acre Slope Density Formula) Zoning Designation: RHS-30 (Residential Hillside with minimum net lot area of 30,000 sq.ft.) Net Lot Area 15,770 sq. ft. (.36 acres) Project Data Allowed Existing Proposed Total Flat Yard Area (square feet) 2,500 sq. ft. max., exclude driveways 1,148 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. 1,148 sq. ft. Project Consistency with: General Plan: Yes Zoning: Yes, with approved Hillside Exception Environmental Assessment: Categorically Exempt per Section 15303 (Class 3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) construction or conversion of small facilities or structures. Background: The project site (Figure 1) is located within the Inspiration Heights neighborhood in a Residential Hillside (RHS) zoning district and is surrounded by hillside single -family residences to the north, south, and west, and a Single Family R-10 neighborhood to the east. The RHS district is intended to balance residential uses with preserving natural settings and protecting life and property from natural hazards. The property is accessed off of San Juan Road by a shared private driveway. The site contains a 4,256 sf two story home developed in 1970 and remodeled in 2011. Proposed Project The applicant, and property owner, Steven Rifai, is proposing adding an 862 sf deck extension to an existing deck and pool along the rear facade of the home. The deck will be made of Ipe wood with artificial grass in the middle and surrounded by a cable wire railing approximately 3.5 ft in height. The developed deck will be supported by structural columns that require no grading to install. A new wooden staircase will replace an existing one along the southern edge of the new deck allowing access below the deck and maintain the yard downslope. No trees will be removed as part of this addition. Hillside Exception: The RHS Ordinance, Chapter 19.40 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, prohibits any structures or improvements over 500 square feet in area on slopes greater than 30% unless an exception is granted. The intent of the requirement is to minimize and discourage unnecessary hillside grading activities and visual disturbances. However, if the project/property presents unique circumstances or hardships (typically physical/topographic challenges), then the City may consider an exception provided that the project is designed to minimize the extent of the exception and impacts to the Figure 1 Site Aerial surrounding hillside. The City has historically granted exceptions to allow reasonable development of steeper hillside properties planned for residential use. Much of the property has slopes greater than 30% (see Figure 2). Therefore, almost any development on the property, outside of the existing building footprint, including the addition of any type of accessory structure (except an Accessory Dwelling Unit) such as the proposed deck, cannot be feasibly constructed on the property without a hillside exception request. The siting and design of the proposed structure eliminates the need for grading as it is adjacent to the house and existing deck and pool. Except that the proposed development is occurring on slopes greater than 30%, the proposed deck complies with all other aspects of the RHS zone’s site development regulations. The development will be constructed with appropriate geotechnical review and inspections as described below. Geological Review: The property is in a hillside and slope instability geologic hazard zone. The City’s Geotechnical Consultant has peer-reviewed the applicant’s geotechnical reports and has concluded that the project is feasible from a geologic standpoint. Their recommendations have been added as conditions of approval. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”), together with the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.) (hereinafter, "CEQA Guidelines"), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15303. The exemption applies to new construction or conversion of small facilities or structures, including single-family residences (see CEQA Guidelines § 15303(a)) and accessory structures, such as patios and swimming pools (see CEQA Figure 2 Slope Percentage over 30% Guidelines § 15303(e)), and none of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply. Other Department/Agency Review: The City’s Building Division, Public Works Department, and the Santa Clara County Fire Department have reviewed and conditionally approved the project. Their pre-hearing comments/conditions have been incorporated as conditions of approval in the draft resolution (Attachment 1). PUBLIC NOTICING & OUTREACH The following table is a brief summary of the noticing done for this project: Public Notice Agenda  Site Signage (14 days prior to the hearing)  Legal ad placed in newspaper (at least 10 days prior to the hearing)  45 public hearing notices mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site (10 days prior to the hearing)  Posted on the City’s official notice bulletin board (one week prior to the hearing)  Posted on the City of Cupertino’s website (one week prior to the hearing) No public comments have been received as of the date of production of this staff report (January 29, 2021). PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT This project is subject to the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Section 65920 – 65964). The City has complied with the deadlines found in the Permit Streamlining Act. Project Received: November 4, 2020; Deemed Incomplete: December 5, 2020 Project Resubmission: December 9, 2020; Deemed Complete: January 8, 2021 The City has 60 days from when the project is deemed categorically exempt to decide on the project. CONCLUSION The lot is surrounded by existing hillside single-family residences and any onsite development that is greater than 500 square feet on a slope greater than 30% would require a Hillside Exception. Development cannot feasibly occur on the property without a Hillside Exception request as the undeveloped portion of the lot is virtually entirely sloped greater than 30%. The location and design of a proposed deck will align with the existing deck and also eliminate grading and minimize the removal of landscaping necessary on site to develop the property in a manner consistent with the Residential Hillside Ordinance. A geotechnical study has been conducted for the proposed project and all recommendations of the geotechnical consultant have been incorporated into the development conditions of the approval. Staff recommends approval of the Hillside Exception since the plans and conditions of approval address all concerns related to the proposed project. Additionally, all the findings for approval of the proposed project, consistent with Chapter 19.40 of the Cupertino Municipal Code have been met. NEXT STEPS Should the project be approved, the Planning Commission’s decision on this proposal is final unless an appeal is filed within 14-calendar days of the date of the mailing of the decision on February 9, 2021. The applicant may apply for building and other permits at the end of the appeal period. This approval expires on February 9, 2023, at which time the applicant may apply for a one-year extension. Prepared by: Gian Paolo Martire, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Piu Ghosh, Planning Manager Approved by: Albert Salvador, Acting Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS: 1 – Draft Resolution for EXC-2020-007 2 – Plan Set DRAFT RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A HILLSIDE EXCEPTION TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN 864 SQUARE FOOT DECK EXPANSION ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 30% AT AN EXISTING HILLSIDE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 22637 SAN JUAN ROAD SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2020-007 Applicant: Curt Cline Property Owner: Steve Rifai and Patricia Billard Location: 22637 San Juan Road (APN#342-17-064) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR A HILLSIDE EXCEPTION: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Hillside Exception as described in Section I of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”), together with the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.) (hereinafter, "CEQA Guidelines"), the City staff has independently studied the proposed Project and has determined that the Project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to the categorical exemption in CEQA Guidelines section 15303 for the reasons set forth in the staff report dated August 25, 2020 and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, on February 9, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to receive public testimony on the Project, including the categorical CEQA exemption in CEQA Guidelines section 15303, and reviewed and considered the information contained in the staff report pertaining to the Project, all other pertinent documents, and all written and oral statements received by the Planning Commission at or prior to the public hearing; and Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 2 WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. The proposed development will not be injurious to property or improvement s in the area nor be detrimental to public health and safety; The proposed site is surrounded by existing hillside single-family residences. A geotechnical study has been conducted for the proposed project and all recommendations of the geotechnical consultant have been incorporated into the development conditions of the approval. In addition, the development is required to meet the Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD) air quality standards for construction activities. The project is also required to adhere to the City’s C.3 Municipal Permit for storm water runoff management. Therefore, the development will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the public health and safety. 2. The proposed development will not create a hazardous condition for pedestrian or vehicular traffic; The proposed deck will not create any new traffic impacts and/or driveways to the shared private access. Therefore, the development will not create a hazardous condition for pedestrian or vehicular traffic. 3. The proposed development has legal access to public streets and public services are available to serve the development; The property is accessed by the private shared driveway onto San Juan Road. In addition, water and sewer connections are available in the street. The proposed project does not propose any changes to such access or services. Therefore, the development has legal access to public streets and public services to serve the development. 4. The proposed development requires an exception which involves the least modification of, or deviation from, the development regulations prescribed in this chapter necessary to accomplish a reasonable use of the parcel; Any onsite development that requires construction of a structure greater than 500 sf on slopes gretare than 30% requires a Hillside Exception. Development cannot feasibly occur on the property without a Hillside Exception request as the site is constrained by steep slopes over 30%. The siting and design of the deck will minimize grading, and minimize the removal of landscaping necessary on site to develop the property in a manner consistent with the Residential Hillside Ordinance. Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 3 5. All alternative locations for development on the parcel have been considered and have been found to create greater environmental impacts than the location of the proposed development; The proposed development will be located adjacent to the existing home an swimming pool in order to avoid excessive grading of the site. Further, the site is constrained by steep slopes that limit areas on the parcel where development may occur. The siting and design of the accessory structure will minimize grading, and minimize the removal of landscaping necessary to develop the property in a manner consistent with the purpose of the Residential Hillside Ordinance. Other alternative locations for development on the parcel would result in greater grading on the site and removal of additional landscaping and/or native trees. The proposed development is located to minimize environmental and grading impacts on the site. 6. The proposed development does not consist of structures on or near known geological or environmental hazards which have been determined by expert testimony to be unsafe or hazardous to structures or persons residing therein (See General Plan Policies 2-49); The geotechnical report and peer review do not indicate any significant conflicts with geological or environmental hazards. Additionally, all recommendations of the geotechnical engineers have been incorporated into the conditions of approval in order to ensure structural stability of the proposed building. Therefore, the proposed development does not consist of structures that have been determined by expert testimony to be unsafe or hazardous to structures or persons residing therein. 7. The proposed development includes grading and drainage plans which will ensure that erosion and scarring of the hillsides caused by necessary construction of roads, housing sites, and improvements will be minimized (See General Plan Policies 2-53, 2-54 and 2-57); The proposed development follows, as closely as possible, the primary natural contours of the lot to minimize erosion and scarring of the hillsides caused by necessary construct ion of the housing site and improvements. Drainage and grading plans have been reviewed and will continue to be reviewed by the City Engineer and the City’s consultant geotechnical engineers to ensure the safety of the development and of those neighboring residences. 8. The proposed development does not consist of structures which would disrupt the natural silhouette of ridgelines as viewed from established vantage points on the valley floor unless either: a. The location of a structure on a ridgeline is necessary to avoid greater negative environmental impacts; or Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 4 b. The structure could not otherwise be physically located on the parcel and the size of the structure is the minimum which is necessary to allow for a reasonable use of the parcel (See General Plan Policies 2-46, 2-47 and 2-48); The property is not located located on a prominent ridgeline. 9. The proposed development consists of structures incorporating designs, color s, materials, and outdoor lighting which blend with the natural hillside environment and which are designed in such a manner as to reduce the effective visible mass, including building height, as much as possible without creating other negative environmental impacts (See General Plan Policies 2-46, 2-50, 2-51 and 2-52); The applicant is required to use natural earth tone and/or vegetation colors, which blend with the natural hillside environment (as a condition of approval) and has designed the project in such a manner as to reduce the effective visible mass to surrounding neighbors as much as possible. 10. The proposed development is located on the parcel as far as possible from public open space preserves or parks (if visible there from), riparian corrid ors, and wildlife habitats unless such location will create other, more negative environmental impacts (See General Plan Policies 2-55, 5-14 and 5-28); The parcel is not located adjacent to public open space preserves, parks, a riparian corridor, or wildlife habitats. The project site is adjacent to other developed properties with a similar zoning. 11. The proposed development includes a landscape plan, which retains as many specimen trees as possible, which utilizes drought-tolerant native plants and ground covers consistent with nearby vegetation, and which minimizes lawn areas (See General Plan Policies 2-54, 5-15 and 5-16); A preliminary landscape plan has been evaluated and the project is conditioned to provide a landscape plan to be reviewed and approved prior to Building Permit issuance. The project shall also comply with Chapter 14.15: Landscape Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC). Additionally, since the site is located in an area designated as Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area by CMC Chapter 16.74, fire-prone plant materials and highly flammable mulches are strongly discouraged. In conformance with California Public Resources Code Section 4291, plants shall be selected, arranged, and maintained to provide defensible space for wildfire protection. The installation of invasive plant species and noxious weeds is also prohibited. Further, Residential Hillside homes are required to minimize turf areas on hillsides and turf may not be planted on slopes greater than 25%. Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 5 Through the proposed site design and conditions of approval, which limit invasive species of plants and turf areas, a balance between the residential development and preservation of the natural hillside setting can be maintained. 12. The proposed development confines solid fencing to the areas near a structure rather than around the entire site (See General Plan Policy 5-17); and To allow free movement of animals, in compliane with the RHS fencing standards, only 5,000 square feet (excluding the principal building) of net lot area may be enclosed with solid fencing. 13. The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the City's General Plan and with the purposes of this chapter as described in Section 19.40.010. The development meets all the development standards for RHS zoned properties and is consistent with the City's General Plan and with the purposes of Chapter 19.40 as described in Section 19.40.010. These have been described in detail in each of the findings above. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has independently reviewed and considered the Project and the basis for the exemption prior to taking any approval actions on the Project, and exercising its independent judgment, based upon the entire record before it, has determined that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15303, which applies to new construction or conversion of single-family residences and accessory structures; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission takes the following actions: 1. Exercises its independent judgment and determines that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15303 and that none of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply. The exemption in CEQA Guidelines section 15303 applies to new construction or conversion of single- family residences and accessory structures. The proposed project is accessory to the existing single-family residence. 2. Approves the application for a Hillside Exception, Application no. EXC-2020-007 subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 6 thereof. The conclusions and subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based, including those contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. EXC-2020-007 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of February 9, 2021, are hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 6 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are included herein by reference as findings. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set consisting of seven (7) sheets, labled Sheets A0.0 through A4.1 entitled, “Planning Permit Review Set: Rifai Residence,” drawn and submitted by Modern House Architecture and Design, the Civil Drawings consisting of two (2) sheets, submitted by Westfall Engineers, Inc. 2. ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the first page of the building plans. 3. ACCURACY OF PROJECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 4. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS/TREATMENTS Final building exterior treatment plan (including but not limited to details on exterior color, material, architectural treatments and/or embellishments) shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The exterior colors and materials shall be natural earth tones and have low light reflectivity values of 60 or less. The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Any exterior changes determined to be substantial by the Director of Community Development shall require a minor modification approval with neighborhood input. 5. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible to the satisfaction of the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition/grading permits. 6. PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN Prior to commencement of construction activities, the applicant shall arrange for a Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 7 pre-construction meeting with the pertinent departments (including, but not limited to, Building, Planning, Public Works, Santa Clara County Fire Department), prior to issuance of grading and/or building permits, to review an applicant-prepared construction management plan including, but not limited to: a. Plan for compliance with conditions of approval b. Plan for public access during work in the public right-of-way c. Construction staging area d. Construction schedule and hours e. Construction phasing plan, if any f. Contractor parking area g. Tree preservation/protection plan h. Site dust, noise and storm run-off management plan i. Emergency/complaint and construction site manager contacts 7. CONSTRUCTION HOURS The applicant shall comply with the standards in Chapter 10.48, Community Noise Control, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. The developer shall be responsible for educating all contractors and subcontractors of said construction restrictions. Rules and regulation pertaining to all construction activities and limitations identified in this permit, along with the name and telephone number of a developer appointed disturbance coordinator, shall be posted in a prominent location at the entrance to the job site, prior to commencement of demolition and/or grading activities. 8. DUST CONTROL The following construction practices shall be implemented during all phases of construction for the proposed project to prevent visible dust emissions from leaving the site: a. Water all exposed surfaces areas (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) at least twice daily and more often during windy periods to prevent visible dust from leaving the site; active areas adjacent to windy periods; active areas adjacent to existing land uses shall be kept damp at all times, or shall be treated with non-toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 8 e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. The applicant shall incorporate the City’s construction best management practices into the building permit plan set prior to any grading, excavation, foundation or building permit issuance. 9. NESTING SURVEY Nests of raptors and other birds shall be protected when in active use, as required by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California of Fish and Game Code. The construction contractor shall indicate the following on all construction plans, if construction activities and any required tree removal occur during the breeding season (February 1 and August 31). Preconstruction surveys shall:  Be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to tree removal or grading, demolition, or construction activities. Note that preconstruction surveys are not required for tree removal or construction, grading, or demolitio n activities outside the nesting period.  Be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the start of tree removal or construction.  Be repeated at 14-day intervals until construction has been initiated in the area after which surveys can be stopped.  Document locations of active nests containing viable eggs or young birds. Protective measures for active nests containing viable eggs or young birds shall be implemented under the direction of the qualified biologist until the nests no longer contain eggs or young birds. Protective measures shall include: Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 9  Establishment of clearly delineated exclusion zones (i.e., demarcated by identifiable fencing, such as orange construction fencing or equivalent) around each nest location as determined by the qualified biologist, taking into account the species of birds nesting, their tolerance for disturbance and proximity to existing development. In general, exclusion zones shall be a minimum of 300 feet for raptors and 75 feet for passerines and other birds.  Monitoring active nests within an exclusion zone on a weekly basis throughout the nesting season to identify signs of disturbance and confirm nesting status.  An increase in the radius of an exclusion zone by the qualified biologist if project activities are determined to be adversely affecting the nesting birds. Exclusion zones may be reduced by the qualified biologist only in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife.  The protection measures shall remain in effect until the young have left the nest and are foraging independently or the nest is no longer active. 10. LANDSCAPE PROJECT SUBMITTAL: The applicant shall submit a full landscape project submittal, per sections 490.1, 492.1, and 492.3 of the Department of Water Resources Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, for projects with landscape area more than 500 square feet; the applicant shall submit either a full landscape project submittal or submit the Prescriptive Compliance Checklist per Appendix D of the Department of Water Resources Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance for projects with landscape area more than 500 square feet and less than 2,500 square feet. The Landscape Documentation Package or Prescriptive Compliance Checklist shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 11. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY As part of the application, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall agree to indemnify, defend with the attorneys of the City’s choice, and hold harmless the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees, and agents (collectively, the “indemnified parties”) from and against any liability, claim, action, cause of action, suit, damages, judgment, lien, levy, or proceeding (collectively referred to as “proceeding”) brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 10 related to any Ordinance, Resolution, or action approving the project, the related entitlements, environmental review documents, finding or determinations, or any other permit or approval authorized for the project. The indemnification shall include but not be limited to damages, fees, and costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys’ fees, and other costs, liabilities, and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether incurred by the Applicant, the City, or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City its actual attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. Such attorneys’ fees and costs shall include amounts paid to the City’s outside counsel and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. The applicant shall likewise agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the indemnified parties from and against any damages, attorneys’ fees, or costs awards, including attorneys’ fees awarded under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, assessed or awarded against the indemnified parties. The Applicant shall cooperate with the City to enter a Reimbursement Agreement to govern any such reimbursement. The Applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City for all costs incurred in additional investigation or study of, or for supplementing, redrafting, revising, or amending, any document (such as an Environmental Impact Report, negative declaration, specific plan, or general plan amendment) if made necessary by proceedings challenging the project approvals and related environmental review, if the applicant desires to continue to pursue the project. The Applicant shall agree that the City shall have no liability to the Applicant for business interruption, punitive, speculative, or consequential damages. 13. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 11 1. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the Director of Public Works in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 2. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Hydrology and pre- and post-development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may include, but is not limited to, subsurface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), bioretention basins, vegetated swales, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff from the site and improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on- site (e.g., via buried pipes, retention systems or other approved systems and improvements) as necessary to avoid an increase of the ten percent flood water surface elevation to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Any storm water overflows or surface sheeting should be directed away from neighboring private properties and to the public right of way as much as reasonably possible. 3. FEES The project developer shall provide payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said fees shall be executed and paid prior to issuance of Building permit. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: Per current fee schedule ($1,046) b. Storm Drainage Fee: Per current fee schedule ($3,875 per DU) The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 4. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 12 5. EROSION CONTROL PLAN Developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 6. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all grading/erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 7. DEDICATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS Developer shall “quit claim” to the City all rights to pump, take or otherwise extract water from the underground basin or any underground strata in the Santa Clara Valley. 8. GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DESIGN COORDINATION The Project Geotechnical Consultant and Project Structural Engineer should coordinate to provide a deck foundation system that p erforms in a manner consistent with the swimming pool and residence. Pier recommendations for the swimming pool and residential underpinning included minimum embedment depths of 8 feet into bedrock, whereas the deck pier recommendations include minimum bedrock embedment of 5 feet. If the residential structure was not underpinned, then the performance differences between the deck and residence should be taken into account in the new deck design. 9. STRUCTURAL PLANS Structural plans and calculations should be generated that incorporate the recommendations of the Project Geotechnical Consultant. 10. GEOTECHNICAL PLAN REVIEW The applicant's geotechnical consultant should review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the development plans (i.e., including site preparation and grading, site drainage improvements and design parameters for building foundations) to ensure that their recommendations have been properly incorporated. The Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Coordination, Structural Plans, and Geotechnical Plan Review should be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Staff and City Geotechnical Consultant prior to approval of Building Permits. The following should be performed prior to final (as-built) project approval: Draft Resolution EXC-2020-007 February 9, 2021 Page 13 11. GEOTECHNICAL FIELD INSPECTION The geotechnical consultant should inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspections should include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface and subsurface drainage improvements, and excavations for pier foundations prior to the placement of steel and concrete. The results of these inspections and the as-built conditions of the project should be described by the geotechnical consultant in a letter and submitted to the City Engineer for review and appr oval prior to final (asbuilt) project approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of February, 2021, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Piu Ghosh R Wang Planning Manager Vice Chair, Planning Commission CIVIL C1 C2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 10 1 2 2 A8.12 A GRID LINE - F.O.S. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED DIMENSION TO FACE OF FRAMING DIMENSION TO CENTERLINE DIMENSION TO FACE OF FINISH DETAIL REFERENCE SHEET LOCATION INTERIOR ELEVATION KEY AND SHEET LOCATION DOOR NUMBER, SEE DOOR SCHEDULE WINDOW NUMBER, SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE ELEVATION DATUM POINT CROSS SECTION SHEET LOCATION EXTERIOR ELEVATION SPOT ELEVATION DRAWING KEYNOTE MATCH LINE DRAWING REVISION SYMBOLSABBREVIATIONS NOTES 00.00' 1 A4.1 1A3.1 1 A7.1 COVERSHEET A0.0 AS NOTEDSCALE : SHEET : REVISIONS:RIFAI RESIDENCE DECK EXTENSION22637 SAN JUAN ROADCUPERTINO, CATHESE DRAWINGS ARE THE ORIGINAL UNPUBLISHED WORKOF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED OR USEDWITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ARCHITECT.© MODERN HOUSE ARCHITECTSFILE PATH: /Users/moderndesignco/Desktop/00 Projects/Rifai/Rifai_DeckExtension 8-17-20.pln • LAST SAVED BY: Modern House - Natsumi • PRINTED ON 10/29/20 @ 4:14 PM***PROJECT COMPANY*** • RIFAI RESIDENCE • 4|15|2011 • A0.0101 ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Curt Cline Architect 1245 Howard Ave. Burlingame Ca. 94010 P. 650.347.9600 C. 415.596.7281 modernhouse@mac.com www.modernhousearchitects.com 10/29/20DATE :342-17-064PLANNING PERMIT REVIEW SETA.F.F. ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AB ANCHOR BOLT ABV. ABOVE AC AIR CONDITIONING ADJ. ADJUSTABLE ALUM. ALUMINUM ASPH. ASPHALT B.O. BOTTOM OF B.U.R. BUILT-UP ROOFING BD BOARD BLDG. BUILDING BLKG. BLOCKING BLW. BELOW BM. BEAM BRZ. BRONZE BTW. BETWEEN C.I. CAST IRON C.I.P. CAST IN PIPE C.O. CLEAN OUT CAB. CABINET CL CENTER LINE CLG. CEILING CLO. CLOSET CLR. CLEAR CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COL. COLUMN CONC. CONCRETE CONT. CONTINUOUS CSK. COUNTERSINK CSMT. CASEMENT CTR. CENTER CW COLD WATER DF DOUGLAS FIR DH DOUBLE HUNG DIA. DIAMETER DIM. DIMENSION DISP. GARBAGE DISPOSAL DN. DOWN DR. DOOR DTL DETAIL DW DISHWASHER DWG. DRAWING DWR. DRAWER (E) EXISTING EA. EACH EL. ELEVATION ELEV. ELEVATOR (OR ELEVATION) EQ EQUAL EXP. EXPOSED EXT. EXTERIOR F.G. FINISHED GRADE/FIXED GLASS F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH F.O.S. FACE OF STUD FD FLOOR DRAIN FDN. FOUNDATION FIN. FINISH FLR. FLOOR FRPR. FIREPROOFING FTG. FOOTING G.I. GALVANIZED IRON G.W.B. GYPSUM WALLBOARD GA. GAUGE GL. GLASS H.C. HOLLOW CORE H.W. HOT WATER HB HOSEBIB HDR. HEADER HOR. HORIZONTAL HT HEIGHT HTR. HEATER I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER INS. INSULATION INT. INTERIOR J.H. JOIST HANGER JB JUNCTION BOX JST. JOIST JT JOINT K.D. KILD DRIED L.H. LEFT HAND LAV. LAVATORY LT. LIGHT MAX. MAXIMUM MED. MEDIUM MFR. MANUFACTURER MIN. MINIMUM MIR. MIRROR MTD. MOUNTED MTL. METAL (N) NEW N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE NIC NOT IN CONTRACT O/ OVER OC ON CENTER OPG. OPENING P.T. PRESSURE TREATED PL. PLATE PLAM. PLASTIC LAMINATE PLYWD. PLYWOOD PNL. PANEL PR. PAIR PTD. PAINTED R RISER R.H. RIGHT HAND R.O. ROUGH OPENING R.W.L. RAIN WATER LEADER RAD. / R. RADIUS REINF. REINFORCED REQ'D REQUIRED RESIL. RESILIENT RM. ROOM RWD. REDWOOD S.A.D. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS S.C. SOLID CORE S.C.D. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS S.L.D. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS S.P. SOLID PIPE S.S. STAINLESS STEEL S.S.D. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS S.T. STEEL TROWEL SH. SHELF SHR. SHOWER SIM. SIMILAR SPK. SPEAKER STL. STEEL STN. STAIN T&G TONGUE & GROOVE T. TREAD T.O. TOP OF T.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETE T.O.P. TOP OF PLATE T.O.S. TOP OF STEEL / SLAB T.O.W. TOP OF WALL T.P.H. TOILET PAPER HOLDER T.S. TUBE STEEL THK. THICKNESS TYP. TYPICAL U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD V.T.R. VENT THROUGH ROOF VP VENT PIPE W.O. WHERE OCCURS W.P. WATERPROOFING W.S. WEATHER STRIPPING W/ WITH WC WATER CLOSET WD. WOOD WDW. WINDOW WH WATER HEATER 1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE DISTURBANCE, A LICENSED SURVEYOR OR CIVILENGINEER SHALL STAKE THE BUILDING CORNERS, ESTABLISH AVERAGENATURAL GRADE, AND SET A REFERENCE POINT (IF HEIGHT REFERENCE ISOTHER THAN NATURAL GRADE, LICENSED SURVEYOR OR CIVIL ENGINEERSHALL DETERMINE THE SPECIFIED REFERENCE POINT). 2. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY 6' OPAQUE FENCE AT ALL TIMESDURING CONSTRUCTION. 3. NO CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, PORTABLE TOILETS, TRASHCONTAINERS, OR DEBRIS SHALL BE PLACED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 4. A TRASH CONTAINER SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES ANDDEBRIS ON SITE WHICH COULD OTHERWISE BLOW AWAY, SHALL BEREGULARLY COLLECTED AND PLACED IN CONTAINER. 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS (WOOD SCRAPS AND OTHER DEBRIS, WHICHCANNOT BLOW AWAY) SHALL BE PILED WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES OF THEPROJECT IN A NEAT AND SAFE MANNER. 6. PROJECT SHALL HAVE A SIGNAGE VIEWABLE FROM THE PUBLIC STREET THATINDICATES THE HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION AS: MON-FRI FROM 7:30AM TO6:00PM, SATURDAYS FROM 9:00AM TO 5:00PM. 7. PRIOR TO REQUESTING A FOUNDATION INSPECTION BY THE CITY, THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR CIVIL ENGINEER WHO PREPARED THE SOILINVESTIGATION SHALL PROVIDE A FIELD REPORT (IN WRITING) WHICH SHALLSTATE THE FOLLOWING: A. THE BUILDING PAD WAS PREPARED AND COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE SOIL REPORT AND SPECIFICATIONS B. THE FOUNDATION AND/OR PIER EXCAVATION, DEPTH AND BACKFILLMATERIALS, AND DRAINAGE (IF APPLICABLE) SUBSTANTIALLYCONFORM TO THE SOIL REPORT AND APPROVED PLANS. 8. PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION FOR ANY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR CIVIL ENGINEER WHO PREPARED THE SOILINVESTIGATION SHALL ISSUE A FINAL REPORT STATING THE COMPLETED PAD,FOUNDATION, FINISH GRADING, AND ASSOCIATED SITE WORK SUBSTANTIALLYCONFORM TO THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND INVESTIGATION. 9. POOL EXCAVATION, E.V. CHARGER AND CONSTRUCTION NOT APPROVED ASPART OF THIS PROJECT. A SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE OBTAINEDPRIOR TO ANY POOL EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. ARCHITECT SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE SITE AT ALL TIMES ARCHITECTURAL A0.0 A0.3 A1.0 A2.1 A3.1 A3.2 A4.1 A5.3 COVERSHEET WHITE MODEL RENDERING & COLOR/MATERIAL ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN NEW DECK EXTENSION PLAN SOUTH ELEVATION (PROPOSED) NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS(PROPOSED) SECTION Lighting Specifications (Interior) NEW DECK, CONCRETE STEPS AND NEIGHBOR GATE FOR STEVE RIFAI AND TRISH BILLARD STEVE RIFAI AND TRISH BILLARD22637 SAN JUAN RD., CUPERTINO, CATel:  408-230-5984EMAIL: steve@endicia.com MODERN HOUSE ARCHITECTS 1265 INDIANA STREET SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA TEL: (415) 800-8520 EMAIL: MODERNHOUSE@ME.COM *** GENRAL CONTRACTOR *** CONTACT ADDRESS CITY, STATE TEL: FAX: WESTFALL ENGINEERS BIG BASIN WAY SARATOGA CA PH:408-867-0244 EMAIL:karel@westf.com SITE N OWNER: ARCHITECT: GENERAL CONTRACTOR: CIVIL ENGINEER: DIRECTORY PROJECT DATA DRAWING INDEX LOCATION: 22637 SAN JUAN ROAD CUPERTINO, CA 94022 APN: 342-17-064 ZONING: RHS-30 LOT SIZE: 16,203 SQ. FT. BLDG USE: SINGLE FAMILY LAND USE: VERY LOW DENSITY (1/2 ACRE SLOPE DENSITY FORMULA) CONSTRUCTION TYPE TYPE V BLDG. CODE: 2019 CBC, CGBC, CRC, CMC, CPC, CFC, CEC AND C ENERGY CODE PROJECT SCOPE: NEW DECK EXTENSION (862 SQ. FT.) TO ALIGN WITH EDGE OF ADJACENT POOL AND POOL DECK. ALSO THE ADDITION OF NEW WOODEN STEPS TO ACCESS REAR YARD AS WELL AS A NEW WOODEN WALK AND STOOP TO INCLUDE A NEW NEIGHBOR GATE IN EXISTING SIDE YARD FENCE FLOOR AREA PROPOSED FLOOR AREA: (E) WALKOUT BASEMENT 1,256 SQ. FT. (E) FIRST FLOOR 2,370 SQ. FT. (E) GARAGE 630 SQ. FT. NEW DECK EXTENSION 862 SQ. FT. BUILDING LOT COVERAGE: PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: TOTAL BUILDINGS: 2,664 sq. ft. TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: MDA: 7,176 sq. ft. VICINITY MAP RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP WHITE MODEL RENDERING & COLOR/ MATERIAL A0.3 AS NOTEDSCALE : SHEET : Revisions: DATE :THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE ORIGINAL UNPUBLISHED WORKOF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED OR USEDWITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ARCHITECT.Curt Cline© MODERN HOUSE10/29/20FILE PATH: /Users/moderndesignco/Desktop/00 Projects/Rifai/Rifai_DeckExtension 8-17-20.pln • LAST SAVED BY: Modern House - Natsumi • PRINTED ON 10/29/20 @ 4:14 PM***PROJECT COMPANY*** • RIFAI RESIDENCE • 4|15|2011 • A0.3ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Curt Cline Architect 1265 Indiana St. San Francisco Ca. 94107 C. 415.596.7281 modernhouse@me.com www.modernhousearchitects.com RIFAI RESIDENCE DECK EXTENSION22637 SAN JUAN ROADCUPERTINO, CA342-17-064PLANNING PERMIT REVIEW SETEXISTING REAR FACADE WITH PROPOSED DECK EXTENSION (E) REAR DECK AND GUARDRAIL PHOTO (N) CABLE GUARDRAILTO MATCH EXISTING (N) IPE DECK WITHNATURAL FINISHTO MATCH EXISTING ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A1.0 AS NOTEDSCALE : SHEET : Revisions: DATE :THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE ORIGINAL UNPUBLISHED WORKOF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED OR USEDWITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ARCHITECT.Curt Cline© MODERN HOUSE10/29/20FILE PATH: /Users/moderndesignco/Desktop/00 Projects/Rifai/Rifai_DeckExtension 8-17-20.pln • LAST SAVED BY: Modern House - Natsumi • PRINTED ON 10/29/20 @ 4:14 PM***PROJECT COMPANY*** • RIFAI RESIDENCE • 4|15|2011 • A1.0ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Curt Cline Architect 1265 Indiana St. San Francisco Ca. 94107 C. 415.596.7281 modernhouse@me.com www.modernhousearchitects.com RIFAI RESIDENCE DECK EXTENSION22637 SAN JUAN ROADCUPERTINO, CA342-17-064PLANNING PERMIT REVIEW SET1 LEGEND - ENLARGED SITE PLAN: EXISTING CONTOURS PROPERTY / SETBACK LINE AREAS WITH SLOPES 30% OR GREATER 9"BLK WNT. 20"BLK WNT. 9"WNT+9"BLK WNT 18"OAK 30"RDW 18"RDW 14"ACA 14"TREEELEC. COELECTRICAL AD 36"EUC. IP CO 24"TREEN 13°48'40" E 44.39'N 47°17'00" W 71.56'N 21°50'34" E 50.84'N 50°16'54" E 89.32'N 45°03'51" W 154.09'N 13°48'40" E 66.12'N 74°44'00" E 125.24'12"OAKGAS 520 510 530540540540INGRESS & EGRESS E S M N T . (E) 5' BLOCK WALL DECK20"RDW14"RDW490 20.00'(E) WOOD STEPS(E) GRASS PAVE 2 EXISTING RESIDENCE TO REMAIN UNCHANGED (E) PAVE. (E) UPPER DECK (E) PERVIOUS GARDEN (E) WOOD STEPS TO BE REMOVED (E) POOL NO NEW BOUNDARY FENCES ARE PROPOSED. EXISTING BOUNDARY FENCES ARE TO REMAIN. (N) NEIGHBOR GATE (N) LOWER DECK (N) WOOD FLATWORK BELOW (N) WOODEN STEPS BELOW DN (E) FENCE(E) 10'-0" SIDE YARD SET-BACK500 510 (E) 20'-0" REAR YARD SET-BACK (E) 10'-0" SIDE YARD SET-BACK(E ) 10 ' -0 " S IDE YARD SET -BACKDRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2% DRAIN TO REARFOUNDATION WALL2% DRAIN TO REARFOUNDATION WALL2% DRAIN TO REARFOUNDATION WALL2% SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 4 SITE PLAN A1.0 ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING IS LESS THAN 100WATTS/FIXTURE AND IS SHIELDED EXISTINGINGRESS ANDEGRESS DRIVETO REMAIN EXIST.DRAINAGEUNCHANGEDEXIST.DRAINAGEUNCHANGEDEXIST.DRAINAGEUNCHANGEDEXISTING SEWERTO REMAIN UNCHANGED THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHOULDINSPECT, TEST (AS NEEDED), ANDAPPROVE ALL GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTSOF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION 2% TYP. AREA OF NEW WORK N NEW DECK EXTENSION PLAN A2.1 AS NOTEDSCALE : SHEET : Revisions: DATE :THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE ORIGINAL UNPUBLISHED WORKOF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED OR USEDWITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ARCHITECT.Curt Cline© MODERN HOUSE10/29/20FILE PATH: /Users/moderndesignco/Desktop/00 Projects/Rifai/Rifai_DeckExtension 8-17-20.pln • LAST SAVED BY: Modern House - Natsumi • PRINTED ON 10/29/20 @ 4:14 PM***PROJECT COMPANY*** • RIFAI RESIDENCE • 4|15|2011 • A2.1ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Curt Cline Architect 1265 Indiana St. San Francisco Ca. 94107 C. 415.596.7281 modernhouse@me.com www.modernhousearchitects.com RIFAI RESIDENCE DECK EXTENSION22637 SAN JUAN ROADCUPERTINO, CA342-17-064PLANNING PERMIT REVIEW SETC CEE 8A6.1R/FB C D 1 2 3 4 5 5 E F 9 A8.1 NEW WOOD STEPSTO MATCH DECK48'-6 1/2"4'-0"5'-0 1/8"10'-8 1/4"2'-7 3/8"17'-9 1/4"20'-0"4'-0"14'-0 1/8" 6'-7 3/4"38'-0 1/8"3'-10 5/8"6'-6 1/4"11 1/4"12'-10"4'-0"(N) GRASS DECK AREA487.30 sq ft (N) DECK AREA383.98 sq ft UP (E) POOL (E) SPA DWHOSEBIB HOSEBIBHOSEBIBDN 1/2"DN 1/2"DN 1/2"DN 1/2"DN 1/2"DN 1/2" DN 1/2" TOP OF WALL 7'-6" AFG/ANG CLAD IN STONE TOP OF WALL 2'-6" ABOVE LOWER WALL CLAD IN STONE WATER HEATER HVAC 4" CONC. PAD FOR A.C. DIM. OF NEWDECK DIM. OF NEWDECKDN (N) WOOD FLATWORK(N) WOOD FLATWORK(N) NEIGHBORGATEDRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%DRAINAGESLOPE 2%(E) 10'-0" SIDE YARD SET-BACK(E) 10'-0" SIDE YARD SET-BACK(E ) 10 ' -0 " S IDE YARD SET -BACK DRAIN TO REARFOUNDATION WALL2% DRAIN TO REARFOUNDATION WALL2% DRAIN TO REARFOUNDATION WALL2% (N) EXTERIOR LED BOLLARD (N) EXTERIOR LED BOLLARD (N) EXTERIORLED BOLLARD CRAWLSPACE FAMILY ROOM BATH 2 EXERCISE STEVE'S STUDY 1 A4.12 A3.2 2A3.11A3.2NOTES - FLOOR PLAN: -- ALL GRIDLINES ARE TO FACE OF STUD, U.O.N. -- ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD, U.O.N. SEE DIMENSION SYMBOLS ON COVER SHEET -- SEE SITE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL HARDSCAPE INFORMATION -- ALL 125-VOLT, 15 AND 20 AMPRE RECEPTACLE OUTLETS SHALL BE LISTED TAMPER RESISTANT RECEPTACLES CEC 406.111 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 NEW DECK EXTENSION PLAN A2.1 ENTIRE DECK SURFACE AT ALL EXTERIOR DOORS IS 1/2" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR MEETS R311.3 AREA OF WORK N SOUTH ELEVATION (PROPOSED) A3.1 AS NOTEDSCALE : SHEET : Revisions: DATE :THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE ORIGINAL UNPUBLISHED WORKOF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED OR USEDWITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ARCHITECT.Curt Cline© MODERN HOUSE10/29/20FILE PATH: /Users/moderndesignco/Desktop/00 Projects/Rifai/Rifai_DeckExtension 8-17-20.pln • LAST SAVED BY: Modern House - Natsumi • PRINTED ON 10/29/20 @ 4:15 PM***PROJECT COMPANY*** • RIFAI RESIDENCE • 4|15|2011 • A3.1ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Curt Cline Architect 1265 Indiana St. San Francisco Ca. 94107 C. 415.596.7281 modernhouse@me.com www.modernhousearchitects.com RIFAI RESIDENCE DECK EXTENSION22637 SAN JUAN ROADCUPERTINO, CA342-17-064PLANNING PERMIT REVIEW SETNOTES: ELEVATION 00 CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIES FA3 (N) TYPICAL DECK CONSTRUCTION SC1 (N) WOODEN STAIR CASE 10 SPECIALTIES 10.29 MIN. 42" TALL CABLE GUARDRAIL TO MATCH EXISTING A B C D E F 0'-0" FIN. FLOOR (E) 8'-0" CLG. (E) 11'-3 7/8" ROOF BRG. -9'-7" FIN. DECK 12'-3 7/8"9'-7"8'-0"3'-3 7/8"8 1/8"SC1 S1 10.29 FA3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 SOUTH ELEVATION A3.1 AREA OF WORK ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED COLORS,MATERIALS, AND EXTERIOR FINISHES SHALLBE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITYOF CUPERTINO PLANNING DIVISION PRIOR TOINSTALLATION/APPLICATION. NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS(PROPOSED) A3.2 AS NOTEDSCALE : SHEET : Revisions: DATE :THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE ORIGINAL UNPUBLISHED WORKOF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED OR USEDWITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ARCHITECT.Curt Cline© MODERN HOUSE10/29/20FILE PATH: /Users/moderndesignco/Desktop/00 Projects/Rifai/Rifai_DeckExtension 8-17-20.pln • LAST SAVED BY: Modern House - Natsumi • PRINTED ON 10/29/20 @ 4:15 PM***PROJECT COMPANY*** • RIFAI RESIDENCE • 4|15|2011 • A3.2ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Curt Cline Architect 1265 Indiana St. San Francisco Ca. 94107 C. 415.596.7281 modernhouse@me.com www.modernhousearchitects.com RIFAI RESIDENCE DECK EXTENSION22637 SAN JUAN ROADCUPERTINO, CA342-17-064PLANNING PERMIT REVIEW SETNOTES: ELEVATION 00 CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIES FA3 (N) TYPICAL DECK CONSTRUCTION S1 (N) STRUCTURAL COLUMN SC1 (N) WOODEN STAIR CASE 10 SPECIALTIES 10.29 MIN. 42" TALL CABLE GUARDRAIL TO MATCH EXISTING D C B AFE 0'-0" FIN. FLOOR (E) 8'-0" CLG. (E) 11'-3 7/8" ROOF BRG. -9'-7" FIN. DECK 9'-7"8'-0"3'-3 7/8"8 1/8"10.29 FA3 5 4 3 2 1 SC1 S1 10.29 FA3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 NORTH ELEVATION A3.2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 EAST ELEVATION A3.2 AREA OF WORK AREA OF WORK ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED COLORS,MATERIALS, AND EXTERIOR FINISHES SHALLBE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITYOF CUPERTINO PLANNING DIVISION PRIOR TOINSTALLATION/APPLICATION. SECTION A4.1 AS NOTEDSCALE : SHEET : Revisions: DATE :THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE ORIGINAL UNPUBLISHED WORKOF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED OR USEDWITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ARCHITECT.Curt Cline© MODERN HOUSE10/29/20FILE PATH: /Users/moderndesignco/Desktop/00 Projects/Rifai/Rifai_DeckExtension 8-17-20.pln • LAST SAVED BY: Modern House - Natsumi • PRINTED ON 10/29/20 @ 4:15 PM***PROJECT COMPANY*** • RIFAI RESIDENCE • 4|15|2011 • A4.1ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Curt Cline Architect 1265 Indiana St. San Francisco Ca. 94107 C. 415.596.7281 modernhouse@me.com www.modernhousearchitects.com RIFAI RESIDENCE DECK EXTENSION22637 SAN JUAN ROADCUPERTINO, CA342-17-064PLANNING PERMIT REVIEW SET2"3"2"6 7/8"1 1/2"1"3 3/4"6 3/8" 1 3/8" ARTIFICIAL GRASS FIBER OVER WASHED SILICA SAND AND RECYCLED CRYOGENIC RUBBER INFILL DRAINAGE LAYER WITH ROOT BARRIER DRAINAGE TILE SYSTEM ROOF MATERIAL (N) STRUCTURAL DECK (E) FOUNDATION DRAIN TO (E) SITE DRAINGETYP.CABLE RAIL SYSTEM BY Feeney Inc.  2603 Union Street  Oakland, CA 94607-2423  Toll Free: 1-800/888-2418  Phone: 1-510/893-9473  Fax: 1-510/893-9484  E-mail: sales@feeneywire.com CHICHIPATE RAIL 1X2 BAR STOCK VERTICAL SANDBLASTED AND CLEAR POWDER COATED 1/4" STEEL PLATE SANDBLAST AND CLEAR POWDER COAT CONT. WELD TO BAR STOCK VERTICAL (4) 1/2" THRU-BOLTS WITH CARRIAGE HEADS CONT. IPE FASCIA P.T. BLOCKING 1X4 IPE DECKING OVER EXIST DECK FRAMING FRONT ELEVATION LED Garden and Pathway Bollard - 77277 / 77276 By BEGA Call Us 866 428 9289 Product Options Finish: Black, Bronze Model: In-Ground Details Designed in 2015 Made In USA Dimensions Fixture: Width 3.5", Height 9.9", Depth 3.5" Lighting Integrated LED Additional Details Product URL: https://www.ylighting.com/led-garden-and-pathway-luminaire---77276-by-bega-BEGP15078 6.html Notes: Product ID: BEGP150786 Prepared by:Prepared for: Project: Room: Placement: Approval: Created March 11th, 2020 NOTES: SECTION 00 CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIES FA3 (N) TYPICAL DECK CONSTRUCTION S1 (N) STRUCTURAL COLUMN 10 SPECIALTIES 10.29 MIN. 42" TALL CABLE GUARDRAIL TO MATCH EXISTING 26 ELECTRICAL 26.1 (N) EXTERIOR BOLLARD FIXTURE LED GARDEN AND PATHWAY BOLLARD - 77277 DIMENSIONS: 3.5"W X 9.9"H X 3.5"D MANF.: BEGA D C BFE TRISH'S STUDY 104 PH. GAL. 110 BATH 1 108 CRAWLSPACE EXERCISE 003 2 A4.1 3'-8 1/8" 16'-10 1/2" 10.29 S1 26.1 FA3 EXISTING GRADE SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 2 SECTION AT NEW DECK A4.1 SCALE: 1:1.11 3 EXTERIOR LIGHTING SPECIFICATION A4.1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 CROSS SECTION AT NEW DECK A4.1 C1C1 C2C2