PC 05-24-82
CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014
Telephone: (408) 252-4505
PC-385
Page 1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON MAY 24, 1982 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, CITY HALL
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m.
SALUTE TO THE FLAG
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Adams, Binneweg, Blaine, Koenitzer, Chair-
person Claudy
Staff Present: Director of Planning and Development Sisk
City Clerk Cornelius
Director of Public Works Viskovich
Assistant Planning Director Cowan
City Attorney Kilian
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes
by Com.
approve
of Regular Adjourned Meeting of April 22, 1982 - It was moved
Blaine, seconded by Com. Adams and passed unanimously to
as submit ted.
Minutes of the Regular Adjourned Meeting of May 12, 1982 - It was
moved by Com. Blaine, seconded by Com. Koenitzer and passed with Com.
Claudy abstaining to approve as submitted.
POSTPONEMENTS OR NEW AGENDA ITEMS: It was moved by Com. Blaine, sec-
onded by Com. Adams and passed unanimously to continue Item No.2,
Application 2l-U-80 of Far West Savings and Loan Association to
the regular meeting of June 14, 1982.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Application I-GPA-80 of City of Cupertino: General Plan Amend-
ment to consider a comprehensive amendment of the City of Cuper-
tino General Plan and a Specific Plan for the Stevens Creek Boule-
vard Planning Area. The General Plan Amendment will concentrate
on land use, traffic circulation, housing and economic issues
which affect the entire community. The Stevens Creek Boulevard
Specific Plan will concentrate on the development of a more de-
tailed land use, circulation and urban design plan for properties
which abut the reach of Stevens Creek Boulevard between Stelling
Road on the west and Stern Avenue on the east. First Hearing
continued.
P~ 185
E ,2
MINUTES OF THE MAY 24, 1982 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MAJOR DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Staff presentation
1. Public Safety: Central Fire District and County Sheriff's
Department
2. Circulation
3. Housing
4. Land Use/Community Character
B. Discussion
Assistant Planning Director Cowan briefly reviewed the application
and planned format for discussion with the Commission. He introduced
Capt. Don Tamm of the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department and
Chief Doug Sporleder of Central Fire Protection District.
1. Public Safety: Central Fire District and County Sheriff's
Department
Capt. Tamm informed the Commission that in determining public safety
needs he had considered maximum buildout which would basically consist
of a change of style from horizontal to vertical policing. Problems
include visibility and communications. Plans should call for built-
in communication systems in areas of high intensity development.
Other issues to consider would be increase of establishment of private
security, both during and after construction; built-in surveillance
equipment for underground parking and concealed area; adequate
planning for access and parking of emergency vehicles; adequate
roadways for peak traffic (including holidays, conventions, etc.);
business use of modern security devices. Capt. Tamm informed the
Commission that maximum buildout could at times require double the
number of Sheriff personnel on the streets in Cupertino. He stated
that there are models in other areas available that could be used.
Chief Sporleder stated that at present there are two fire stations
and ten staff members in Cupertino. With buildout, no high rise (over
60 feet), and estimating 50,000 population, and the addition of a
station in the Seven Springs area, Chief Sporleder stated that there
would be an increase to a total of twelve firefighters on duty. Any
problems would be very little different from those faced now. A
fire could be fought inside or outside the building. With develop-
ment of high rise buildings, a fire can be fought from inside the
structure only. Approximately 15 additional firefighters would be
necessary as well as one more pumping apparatus. Additional staffing
would include three battalion chiefs and an additional fire prevention
inspector. Chief Sporleder stated that access was critical. It
was necessary to make sure that underground parking areas were accessible
to emergency vehicles. Additional training of firefighters was also
necessary. This is being undertaken and is expected to be completed
when development is done.
MINUTES OF THE MAY 24, 1982 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
PC-385
Page 3
Discussion followed regarding the use of plastics
hotels. Chief Sporleder said that the hotels are
sure they are in conformance with the Fire Code.
nishings are difficult to control.
and synthetics in
inspected to make
However, the fur-
The Commission requested that the Chief submit any information he might
have regarding this particular area.
The Commission was informed that inspection of the structures are done
during construction and subsequent to completion of the building they
are done on an ongoing basis. The Chief would recommend that a partic-
ular party be assigned to a large complex to do inspections on a routin
basis. The Chief stated that buildout with no high rise would be mini-
mal cost to the District, particularly if part of the conditions of
development of the Seven Springs area were the dedication of land and
building of a fire station. With high rise structures the estimated
additional staffing costs is a total of $773,000. This is an ongoing
expense and does not include a plan checker. The additional building
and equipment costs would be $945,000 for a total of $1,718,000. This
includes a Seven Springs station.
Dr. Barbara Stofer, 20555 Prospect, stated that she was at the MGM
Hotel the day before the fire. She presented the Commission with an
article entitled, "Seven Steps to Preserving Rural America", and a
list of research services.
Alf Modine, 10385 Prune Tree Lane, asked if the fire district were
informed when the City closed streets or put up traffic barriers becaus
of traffic problems. He was informed that each station noted such
things on a response card. The Chief also informed Mr. Modine that it
was City policy to notify the fire district. If the district feels
it does affect response time, they will submit comments.
(City Clerk's Note: Capt. Tamm and Chief Sporleder left at 8:20 p.m.)
2. Circulation
Director of Public Works Viskovich reviewed the traffic information
with the Commission. He pointed out different levels of service and
the cost of each scenario. He also reviewed various options for im-
provements in the west Cupertino area. The options included Highway
85 extension, including partial extension, Bollinger extension, a four-
lane Stelling, a diversion (adding a southbound lane on De Anza Bouleva d
at Stevens Creek). He also presented the Commission with a summary
showing various intersections, the current level of service and the
level of service at the intersections projected for 1990 with decreased
existing, intermediate, or increased development and the total cost.
Discussion followed regarding traffic on De Anza Boulevard. It was
stated that perhaps on De Anza southbound over 280 the addition of
a number three lane and extension of the two left turn lanes would
help the flow of traffic. Other measures suggested were removal of
some of the traffic lights and eliminating some of the curb cuts allow-
ing turning movements in and out of business parking lots.
P~385
P 4
MINUTES OF THE MAY 24, 1982 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Director of Public Works Viskovich suggested that the lights and
curb cuts allowing the people out on De Anza keep cars out of the
neighborhoods. He suggested that the commuter not be given a better
level of service than the residents. He was asked why the free
right turn lane from Stevens Creek east to De Anza Boulevard south
was removed. It was stated that the free turning movement was
found to be a hazard.
Mr. Madine asked what information was used as baseline data. He
was informed that staff's and CH2M Hill's report was used. He
was also informed that the County's computer model was not used
but the consultant stated that there is very little difference
for the Cupertino area.
Mr. Madine asked what effect Highway 85 would have on improvements
mentioned in the report. He was informed that CH2M Hill had found
there would be an impact on the City in the a.m. peak.
Upon being asked by the Commission, Director of Public Works Visko-
vieh informed them that the State is not planning in the immediate
future to finish the third lane from Homestead to 101 along Highway
85. Mr. Viskovich discussed the proposed five-cent Countywide tax
on gasoline which would be allowed under SB 215. Dr. Stofer stated
that the local people have created the problem and perhaps they
should pay the five cents.
Chairperson Claudy informed Dr. Stofer that planning had been done
based on the State's stated plan to build Highway 85. In reply
to Dr. Stofer's comment that Cupertino had planned to build on
the Highway 85 right of way, Chairperson Claudy replied that it was an option
if only a two-lane road were built in that corridor.
Bill Lewis 7573 Bollinger, expressed the opinion that the two-thirds
vote required for the additional five-cent tax would probably
not be achieved. He felt that the City should rule out help from
that source. He also stated that Highway 85 had priority 10 in the
area at this time. He stated that of the six or seven problem
intersections mentioned, some type of roadway built in the 85
corridor would probably help. He suggested that even two lanes
could be built and the results tested. He expressed hope that
the staff would refine the costs of the alternatives and their com-
ponents.
Director of Public Works Viskovich stated that he is in touch with
Caltrans regarding the 85 corridor and requirements of an EIS.
He stated that San Jose got funding and approval for Highway 85
regarding the regular procedure - completion of an EIS and alternative
analysis.
RECESS: 9:33-9:52 p.m.
(City Clerk's Note: City Attorney Kilian left at 9:45 p.m.)
MINUTES OF THE MAY 24, 1982 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
PC-385
Page 5
Frank Mulkern, Cupertino Chamber of Commerce, asked if San Jose had
been required to do an entire ErS on the Guadalupe Corridor including
part of 85 and if they did not, why would we be required to do an en-
tire EIS on the corridor even if we built in only a part of it. The
Director of Public Works stated that he would find out that information.
Jim Jackson, 10455 Torre Avenue, stated that he felt that San Jose
probably tied that portion of 85 into Highway 87 as part of that EIS.
3. Land Use/Community Character
Assistant Planning Director Cowan reviewed three diagrams with the Com-
mission. He pointed out the General Plan Amendment study area showing
vacant and underdeveloped acreage with the relationship between the
FAR and footprint. A second diagram showed the General Plan Amendment
study area with the existing FAR as of January 1, 1982. He reviewed da
and evening population estimates during peak periods as well as a
summary of land use activities resulting from the four alternative
land uses and the effect upon community character. The third diagram
showed the General Plan area in relationship to bar and dining facil-
ities. Mr. Cowan also showed drawings of possible development patterns
of Vallco Park and Town Center was well as a map demonstrating location
of high rise development currently existing or approved in the local
bay area. Commission was informed that such concerns as lack of servic
population included in household figures and use of more realistic
figures regarding incomes and down payments on houses would be pre-
sented when the Housing Element of the General Plan was discussed.
It was pointed out that restaurant facilities do bring income into the
City as employees do eat lunch and dinner in the City as well as going
to "happy hour".
Mr. Modine asked if any public housing projects were included in the
General Plan. He was informed that that would show up in the Housing
Element and not the Land Use Element.
Assistant Planning Director Cowan also stated that the present General
Plan does include publicly subsidized housing. It was stated that the
Goals Committee took an opposing view to this.
It was moved by Com. Koenitzer, seconded by Com. Blaine and passed
unanimously to adjourn at 10:32 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., May 26,1982 for
further hearing on the General Plan Amendment.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
4~ ¿4..b
City Clerk