Oaks redevelopment and bicycle pedestrian infrastructure desk item.msg1
Beth Ebben
From:Gerhard Eschelbeck <gerhard@eschelbeck.com>
Sent:Sunday, May 10, 2020 2:10 PM
To:City of Cupertino Planning Commission
Cc:City Council; Deborah L. Feng
Subject:Oaks redevelopment and bicycle / pedestrian infrastructure
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Written Communication/Public Comment Agenda Item 2 Oaks Redevelopment
Dear Members of the Cupertino Planning Commission,
I am a resident of Cupertino and also the chair of the Cupertino Bicycle‐Pedestrian Commission. I am writing this
comment solely as a resident of Cupertino.
The redevelopment of a large parcel such as the Oaks project is a unique opportunity to consider bicycle and pedestrian
facilities. In particular, a safe connection between Mary and Stevens Creek Blvd for bicycle and pedestrians is a critically
important need.
An earlier version of the redevelopment plans submitted proposed a dedicated bicycle / pedestrian trail connection
between Mary and Stevens Creek Blvd on the far west side of the parcel, which would be a safe and dedicated
connection for bicycle and pedestrian traffic. The latest version of plans seem to no longer consider such bicycle and
pedestrian facility, but possibly a shared use facility more to the center of the parcel.
I strongly recommend to reconsider the originally proposed dedicated and safe bicycle and pedestrian path. This is
especially important at a time where Cupertino is making significant investment in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure
throughout the city. The lack of a dedicated bicycle / pedestrian connectivity on the property is a big miss that
will impact Cupertino for many years to come. I appreciate the work the property owner has done on planning the
redevelopment, and encourage the Planning Commission to review the proposed project keeping such dedicated bicycle
pedestrian facility in mind .
Thanks,
Gerhard Eschelbeck.