Reso 1649 33-TM-76
RESOLUTION NO. 1649
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE. SUBDIVISION
®
MAP TO DIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 20.4 ACRES INTO SIX LOTS.
APPLICANT: Richard H. Childress, et al.
ADDRESS: 22025 Regnart Road, Cupertino, California 95014
SUBMITTED: December 28, 1976
LOCATION: In the Regnart Canyon west of Regnart Road approximately 2,000
ft. southerly of the intersection of Regnart Road and Lindy Lane
ZONE: R1-120 (Residential, single-family, 120,000 sq. ft. per dwelling
unit)
FINDINGS AND SUBCONCLUSIONS:
Approval is recommended subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and
subconclusions as set forth in the minutes of the Planning Commission meet-
ing of January 24, 1977.
CONDITIONS:
1-14. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the
improvement requirements set forth in Policy Statement No. 3 of the
Hillside General Plan and the special conditions enumerated herein.
In the event a conflict does exist, the special conditions as
enumerated herein shall apply.
15. The approval is granted based upon tentative map Exhibit A of 33-TM-76
as may be modified by additional conditions contained herein.
16. The grading concept and building location for each lot shall sub-
stantially reflect Exhibit A of 33-TM-76.
17. In order to permit migration of wildlife and to retain the natural
open character of the hillside area, solid fencing shall be limited
to a building envelope. Fencing may be permitted outside of the
building envelope subject to approval by the Architectural and Site
Approval Committee.
18. The grading for the public street, driveways and sites shall be sub-
stantially as shown on Exhibit A. Architectural plans including
proposed lot grading, drainage, and building morphology, shall be
submitted to the Architectural and Site Approval Committee for review
prior to issuances of a building permit for any construction on each
individual lot within the subdivision.
19. A minimum of fifteen (15) feet of slope rounding shall be provided
at the top of all existing and future cut slopes.
20. The applicant or subsequent building permit applicant shall retain
a registered landscape architect to review existing and future grading
plans and in consort with -the Project and City Engineer, shall submit
4111 a plan to prevent soil erosion. In those instances, where plant
materials are to be used, indigenous plants are preferred.
21. Adequate turnaround spaces and four off-street parking spaces shall
be provided on each lot to compensate for the lack of public street
parking and provide space for emergency equipment.
-2-
33-TM-76
Resolution No. 1649 (continued)
110 22. All private driveways serving the development shall be improved as
required by Policy No. 3 of Hillside General Plan and as directed by
the City Engineer.
23. The applicant shall record an appropriate deed restriction and covenant
running with the land subject to the review and approval of the City
Attorney, for all parcels which share a common private drive or private
roadway with one or more other parcels as displayed on Exhibit A.
Said deed restriction shall provide for the necessary reciprocal ingress/
egress easements to and from the affected parcels. Said easements shall
be recorded at such time as interest in one or more of the affected
parcels is initially sold or transferred to another party.
24. A reciprocal maintenance agreement to be reviewed and approved by the
City Attorney, shall be required for all parcels which share a common
private drive or private roadway with one or more other parcels within
the tract. Said agreement shall be recorded in conjunction with
recordation of the final map.
25. That the applicant shall record a covenant on each lot to be transferred
informing future lot purchasers of the existence of geologic hazards
in the area, and additionally, that special development regulations
apply to any construction on the lot.
26. The developer shall agree to participate in an improvement district
to install street improvements on public roadways within the Regnart
® Canyon area as defined by the General Plan. The City shall relieve the
developer of the above requirement if and only if the assessment district
is not foxed- within a reasonable period of time at which time the
developer shall install on his own the required improvements as outlined
in the condition of approval.
27. The landscape area within the cul-de-sac on the public street shall be
landscaped with California natives requiring no City maintenance and
subject to approval of the Architectural and Site Approval Committee.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of January, 1977, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the fol-
lowing roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Blaine, Gatto, Koenitzer, Markkula, Chairman Adams
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST: APPROVED:
110 rbr
James H. Sisk Victor Adams, Chairman
Planning.Director Planning Commission
-3-