PC Reso 1619 '' 26-TM-76
RESOLUTION NO. 1619
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
SUBMITTING A REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDING
4) APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP APPLICATION 26•-TM-76,
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS' OF APPROVAL .
APPLICANT: Dr, Joseph F. Brown
ADDRESS: P. 0. Box C, Cupertino, California 95014
SUBMITTED; October 15, 1976
LOCATION: Northeast corner of the intersection of Lazaneo Drive and Bandley
Drive with. a small segment fronting on North. De Anza Blvd.
ACREAGE: 3.79 acres
CONDITIONS:
1-14. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the
special conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does
exist, the special conditions as enumerated herein shall apply.
15. The tentative map is approved based upon tentative map Rxhibit A,
26-TM-76, as may be modified by additional conditions contained herein.
16. The developer shall participate in the costs of the installation of the
traffic signal at De Anza Boulevard and Lazaneo Drive as the amount is
determined by the City's assessment attorney based upon benefits.
110 17. A reciprocal vehicular circulation easement shall be recorded to permit
access to a 20-ft. wide future private roadway which shall be located
contiguous to the full length of the westerly boundary line of Parcel C.
The easement shall be 30-ft, 'wide for that section between Parcels B and
C. The easement shall be written in a manner, as approved by the City
Attorney, so as to allow access to said easement for Parcels A & B, both
parcels labeled "Lands of Brown" located to the north of the map boundary,
"Lands of Murphy, Lands of Spain, Lands of Posty, Lands of City of Cupertino,
and Lands of Durkee", as labeled on Exhibit A of 26-TM-76.
18. The roadway improvements for the private driveway, described in Condition
17, shall be installed when necessary to service future development of
the properties referenced in Condition 17. The City shall determine
the necessity of access based upon a subsequent proposal for development
on one or more of the properties referenced by Condition 17. A suitable
financial guarantee approved by the City Engineer shall be submitted to
the City guarantying completion of said improvements.
-2-
CITY . OF CUPERTINO
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014 •
Telephone: (408) 252-4505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING
THE APPROVAL OF A. TENTATIVE MAP
WHEREAS, the attached application has been' submitted to the City of Cupertino
requesting approval of a tentative map; and
11,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in
regard to the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has. duly IConsidered and heard all evidence
submitted in regard to said application; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the
subdivision and procedural ordinances of the City of Cupertino.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the Planning Commission makes the, following findings:
a) That the proposed map is consistent with the general and specific
plans. III
b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the general and specific plans.
c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development.
d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
•
e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are
not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially
and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
f) That the design of the subdivisio4 or the type of improvements are
not likely to cause serious public health problems.
g) That the design of the subdivision, or the type of improvements will
not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for
access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.
•
-1- ilk
r
26-TM--7 6
Resolution No. 1619 (continued)
•
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of November, 1976, at a regular adjourned
meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California,
by the following roll call vote;
AYES: Commissioners Blaine, Gatto, Chairman Adams
NAYS: Commissioner Koenitzer
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
APPROVED:
/s/ Victor J. Adams
Victor J. Adams, Chairman
Planning Commission
ATTEST:
ames H. Sisk
Planning Director
•
-3-