PC Reso 1611 25-TM-76
RESOLUTION NO. 1611
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
® RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE
1.39 ACRES INTO TWO PARCELS.
APPLICANT: Denny's Architectural Services
ADDRESS: 16420 Valley View Ave. , La Mirada, California 90637
SUBMITTED: October 13, 1976
LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of Stevens Creek Blvd. and
Blaney Ave.
ACREAGE: 1.39 acres
FURTHER FINDINGS: None
9
411
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November, 1976, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Blaine, Gatto, Koenitzer, Chairman Adams
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
APPROVED:
/s/ Victor J, Adams
Victor J. Adams, Chairman
Planning Commission
ATTEST:
James H. Sisk
111 Planning Director
-2-
CITY OF CUPERTINO
111
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone: (408) 252-4505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING
THE DENIAL.OF A TENTATIVE MAP
WHEREAS, the attached application has been submitted to the City of Cupertino
requesting approval of a tentative map; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in
regard to the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has duly considered and heard all evidence
submitted in regard to said application; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the
subdivision and procedural ordinances of the City of Cupertino.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the Planning Commission makes the following findings:
aZ That the proposed map is inconsistent with the general and specific •
plans.
b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is
inconsistent with the general and specific plans.
c) That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.
d) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are
likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially
and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are
likely to cause serious public health problems.
g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will
conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large; for
access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.