Reso 227 4
File No. 12-V-64
RESOLUTION NO. 227
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING
THE GRANTING OF A VARIANCE for a 6 ' fence in lieu of a 3' fence.
APPLICANT: Mr. K. L. Knapp
ADDRESS: 22344 Riverside Drive, Cupertino
SUBMITTED: September 4, 1964
LOCATION: 22344 Riverside Drive .
ZONE: R-1
(continued from Page 1)
CONDITIONS AND FURTHER FINDINGS: None
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of September, 1964, at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino,in ,
State of California, by the following roll call vote :
AYES: Commissioners Frolich, Gates, Hirshon, Thomson
NOES: Commissioner Traeumer
ABSENT: Commissioners Johnson, Small
APPROVED:
ATTEST: Scott Thomson
Chairman, Planning Commission
- Ill Odd,- c>4•601;41,
Adde Laurin
City and Traffic Planner
1
• I
CITY OF CUPERTINO
City Hall, 10321 South Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road
Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone : (408) 252- -505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOM-
MENDING THE GRANTING OF A VARIANCE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino
received an application for a VARIANCE, as stated on page two; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met ;the burden of proof required to
support his said application; and
WHEREAS, the application shows :
1. That there are special, conditions or exceptional characteris-
tics in the nature of the property to be affected, or that it 's loca-
tion, or it ' s surroundings are such as will permit the Commission to
make a determination that a literal enforcement of the Ordinance would
result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships; and
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and
3. That the hearings show that the granting of the application
will not materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the property which is the
subject of the application, and that the use of said property in the
manner which it is proposed to be used will not be materially detri-
mental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of property or
improvements located in said surroundings;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and
other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the
VARIANCE be, and the same is, hereby recommended for approval to the
City Council of the City of Cupertino for appropriate action, subject
to the conditions stated on page twd; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the aforementioned findings are approved and adopted, and
that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify the parties
affected by this decision.
111(continued on page 2)
-1