Reso 223, 224, 225 410
API 8v-64
9--v-64
File No. 10 V-64
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2.23 - 224 - 225
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received
the application of Blossom View Homes
For a VARIANCE for 8 r fence where ordiance allows
at 20025, 20065, and 20105Cei.ar Tree :Lane
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has. met the burden of proof required to
support his said applications^'��
NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and
other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the
VARIANCE be, and the same is, hereby recommended for approval to the
City Council of the City of Cupertino for appropriate action, subject
to the following conditions:
That the location of the fence be checked with the Building
Department for compliance with the Building Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the report of findings attached hereto are approved and
adopted, and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify
the parties affected by this decision.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Cupertino, Sate of California, this 24th day of August, 1964, by
the following roll call vote:
AYES : Commissioners : Frolich, Hirshon, Small, Thomson
NOES: Commissioners: Gates, Johnson, Traeumer
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
Scott Thomson
Chairman, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
CE_ CYO-g iv
City and Traffic Planner
411
8-v-64
9,v-64
File No. 10-V-64
REPORT OF FINDINGS
The application for a VARIANCE on behalf of Blossom View Homes
shows:
1. That there are special conditions or exceptional character-
istics in the nature of the property to be affected or that it ' s
location, or itfls surroundings are such as will permit the Commission
to make a determination that a literal enforcement of the Ordinance
would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships; and
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and
3. That the granting of the application will not materially
affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working
in the neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the
application, and that the use of said property in the manner which11/
it is proposed to be used will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the value of property or improvements
located in said surroundings.
110
-2