Reso 207 File No. 5-tr_64
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 207
1110 • WHEREAS, the Planning Co. missj,orl of tha Cii ty of Cupertino received
the application of GUY W, PI'Eii't;.ED i'1TCE?: w'.;6- a VAH?:..ANCE for a front
P
yard set back of 15 ' where Ordinance re 1u.ir :s 20 r ; a ld
WHEREAS, the applicant has me t the burden of p�•oof. required to support
his said. application.
NOW, TT41REP OiE, BE IT RESOLVED
That after careful consideration. of maps, facts, exhibits and
other evidence submiti..cd in •Uhis matter, the application for the VAR-
IANCE be and the same is hereby recommended for approval .to the City
Council of the City of Cupertino for appropriate action, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Plan as presented to be an exhibit to accompany this
variance and the variance to be limited to the details
contained thereon.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the report of findings attached hereto are approved and
adopted, and that the Secretary be; and is hereby directed to notify
the parties affected by this decision.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Cu-
ll State of California, this 27th day of April, 1964 by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners : Adamo, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Thomson, Frolich
NOES : . Commissioners : None
ABSENT: Commissioners : None
/s/ Donald Frolich
On airman,rrnan, Planning Conimission
ATTEST:
/s/ Robert S, Shook
Secretary, Planning Commission
111
-1-
File No. 5-V-64
REPORT OF FINDINGS
The application for a VARIANCE on behalf of GUY W. & MILDED FITCH
shows;
1. That there are special conditions or exceptional characteris-
tics in the nature of the property to be affected or that it ' s loca-
tion, or. it's surroundings are such as will permit the. commission :to
make a determination that a literal enforcement of the Ordinance would
result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships; and
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of substantial property rig}!i:s; and
3. That the granting of the application will not materially af-
fect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in
the neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the applica-
tion, and that the use of said property in the manner which it is pro-
posed to be used will not be materially detrimental to the public wel-
fare or injurious to the value of property or improvements located in
said sorroundings.
110
-2-