Reso 199 File No. 2-V-64
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 199
WHEREAS., the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received
the application .of WARD CRUMP DEVELOPMENTS, INC. for a VARIANCE for _.
front yard set backs of 15' where, ,Ordinance requires 20' ,. Lots 152,
153 and 154, Tract NNo". 3492, Baywood Terrace,; Unit #3; and
WHEREAS, the applicant[ has .met: theburden of proof .r,equired to
support his said application.
NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE:.IT 'RESOLVED:.: .
' ' That• after' careful consideration of, maps, facts,, exhibits and
other evidence submitted .in this matter, the application for the VAR-
- IANCE be, and the. same is •hereby recommended for approval to the .City
Council of the City Of Cupertino: for appropriate .action, subject to the
following conditions: ..
1- 'Plot plans .be submitted. . .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: . .
• That the report of findings : attached hereto -are approved and
adopted, and that the .Secretary be, . and is hereby .dir-ected to notify
the parties'.affected. by, this decision: .
• PASSED •AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission' of the City.: of Cu-
pertino, State of. California, this 23d day of March, 1964, by the
following roll .cali vote: •
AYES.: Commissioners -• Adamo., .Small, Snyder, Thomson, Fitzgerald
NOES; Commissioners -. Tone • .
.ABSENT i Commissioners;.--- Frolich, Rampy. • ,
/s/` Jerry•Fitzgerald
Vice-Chairman,Planning Commission
ATTEST": '
/s/ Robert S. Shook
Secretary, Planning Commission .
•
-1-
•
File No. 2-11-64
•
•
• • • •
• , •
. . , . ., • • • v,
• . • •• . • .„ , . •
. - • , •• ••
• • -.REPORT OF FINDINGS.
•• . .
• • .• • •• • • • • .• • • • • •
•, . •. :
The application for a: VAAIANCE on behalf,ofWARD: CIPT DEVELOP-
MENTS,, INC. shows:
•.. •
1. That there are specialcOndftiOht. br_pxcep.tional dbar-
„adteribtics.,14 :the..nature. of the property to be affected or that
itEe:lo-catio.:1,1:-or- 4:t!.':62'.P.IirrOundings-:are.::suchas:.,will. permit :the
-:...:,CoMMissionto. M4.1.c0,14HdeterMination that .A literal entorbelft0#:
of the Ordinance would result in practical difficulties or un
hedessary .hardships.; ' and'
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for
the preservation and enjoyment of substantial .property rights;
and
. • • ••.,
That the granting of the application will not mater-
ially affedt adversely the health -or safety of' persons residing
working - in ,the neighbOrhockUof the property whiCh is thesubo-
, ject of the application, and that the use of said property in
the-MAhnermhich it is proposed to be used will not be materially
- - • detriMental .tothe ..pUblid yelfare .Or- injuriousto the value of 410
property or improvements located in said surroundings.
.• ,• ..
•
,„ . •
. , • • •, „. : j. • .
„ •
•
• • •• • r
. . .
%.• „.
• 7•
•
, • ,
,• _
•• .
-2- : •••.•
• , .
• • . .
. . . •
.„. . .. •
1• ., • . '