Loading...
PC 09-12-79 CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10300 Torre Avenue~ Cupertino, CA 95014 TelephOne (408) 252-4505 PC-3l7 Page 1 (14) MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CUPERTINO CALIFORNIA CALL TO ORDER: 7:40 p.m. SALUTE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Chairman Gatto Com. Koenitzer Com. Claudy Com. Adams Com. Blaine Absent: None Staff Present: Assistant Associate Assistant Assistant Planning Dire c tor Cowan Planner Piasecki City Attorney Kilian City Engineer Whitten APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Postponed to end of meeting per Motion of Recessed Regular Meeting September 1 CHR. GATTO advised the audience that the meeting was a con- tinuation of the Regular Meeting of September la, 1979, and would begin with Item #7. I ì I I ! I ! ITEM #7, Application l7-U-79 of ELDON R. HOFFMAN (ANY MOUN- i TAIN, LTD.): USE PERMIT to temporarily operate a ski ramp to ' be located in the parking lot of the existing Any Mountain i building and ENVIRONMENTAL.REV~EW: T~e projec: is categor~- \ cally exempt, hence no actl0n 1S requlred. Sa1d property lS I located on the southwest corner of Mariani Avenue and North I De Anza Boulevard in a P (Planned Development with industrial commercial and residential intent) zoning District. First Hearing. Tentative City Council hearing date - September 17, 1979. PUBLIC HEARINGS OPENED Assistant Planner Piasecki reminded the Commissioners that the proposal was similar to the one requested a year earlier. He rcported no unusual problems, except that the City had re- ceived complaints from neighbors in a recently constructcd de velopment that traffic and parking problems had gotten out of hand. The two issues were separate (the Use Permit and the parking problem). Referring to the map on the board, he said that there was feeling in the neighborhood that the fence should be extended ,along the cul-de-sac to Sever access to Any Mountain parking area. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION PC-317 Page 2 In response to COM. CLAUDY, Mr. Piasecki advised that con- struction had not started on the proposed building at Any Mountain, Ltd. and that the plans called for additional oarking. (15) COM. KOENITZER asked that they be advised that during the construction work they should not eliminate any existing paved parking spaces and that construction materials should be put on the other part of the lot. CHR. GATTO, because of thc absence of the applicant, invited the interested public to speak to the Use Permit. Mr. Robert Jessinger, 20685 Greenley (extension of Mariani Avenue) said that although they had had a large delegation of neighbors at the City Council Meeting, conflicts prevented their being at the meeting; so, he'd represent them. He said his home was located on a cul-de-sac that could be called an extension of Mariani. At the time of the Any Mountain sale, which he realized was a once-a-year event, it had come to the attention of the neighborhood that the traffic and parking problems resulting from the sale were out of control. Traffic 30es to and fro, making "y" turns, parking in driveways:, and lining up on either side of the street so that the residents were unable to park. The planting of trees as a barrier might relip.ve the congestion in the area. He asked Commissioners to come up with some solution to their problem. In addition he said the industrial parking in the area was also being used by Any Mountain customers and even that did not spero to be sufficient parking space to relieve the neighhorhood problems. COM. BLAINE asked if the parking problem existed during the regular Any Mountain Reason, and was told that a Rass home sales trailer had prevented people from seeing the parking spac..,.e available in the home area -- the removal of th~ trailer takiftg away the visual harrier, and the trees had died. CHR. GATTO and COM. KOENITZER, concerned about the trees, asked Staff to check whether the developers were not responsible for a year. The adjacent Water District property was located on the south of "the bouses, and it was noted that customers of Any Mountain used the dirt parking there. COM. ADAMS asked for identification of streets in the area most affected, and was told all the area was involved. CHR. GATTO explained the purpose of the application before the Planning Commission. .Mr. Klass, a residenti presented photographs of the congested area to the Commissioners and confirmed the severity of the problem. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 5-0 A lengthy discussion by the Commissioners covered all the alternatives to solving the situation and they concluded that there were two problems to handle, both of which could be handled more successfully through the Public Hearing process. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 1979, RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION by Com. Adams to continue l7-U-79 and coordinate a hearing on the parking situation. Second: Com. Claudy WITHDRAWN by Com. Adams after discussion. MOTION: Com. Adams to Continue Application l7-U-79 to October 22, subsequent to a Public Hearing on the Any Mountain-created parking problem. Second: Com. Claudy AYES: Commissioners Claudy, Adams, ~ Blaine NOES: Chr. Gatto & Com. Koenitzer VOTE ITEM #8, Application l8-U-79 of WARREN B. HEID (BORELLI BROTHERS): USE PERMIT tó construct a two -story office buildin consisting of approximately 6,500 sq. ft. and ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration. Said property is located on the north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard approximately 150 ft. easterly of De Anza Boulevard in a P (Planned Devel- opment with commercial and professional office use intent) zoning district. First Hearing. Tentative City Council hearing date - September 17, 1979. Assistant Planning Director Cowan reviewed the Staff Report 0 August 31, 1979, informing the Commissioners that two key points were l} the traffic conformance standards and, 2) a requirement that reciprocal parking be negotiated with Pacifi Valley Bank, wbich was verified by a letter £rom the presiden of the bank. Mr. Cowan advised COM. KOENITZER that the Staf was apprehensive about dead-end parking based on an overall philosophy. PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Warren Heid, Architect, 14630 Big Basin Way, Saratoga, CA, said it was felt if parking was harder to get into there woul be fewer people using it, and further that they felt bringing the parking in from the east would be appropriate for the j building provided all of the sites tied together with recip- rocal parking agreements; and, future expansion and saving th trees might be possible to provide a park-like setting. COM. CLAUDY noted the trash area and said he assumed it would have a gate and that there would be sufficient right-of-way for trucks. Mr. Heid said both assumptions were correct. PUBLIC HEARINGS CLOSED: Com. Adams. Vote: PASSED Second: Com. Koenitzer 5-0 COM. KOENITZER stated that the parking ratio was of concern t him because in recent applications the 1 - 200 ratio for commercial seems to be converted to 1 for 50 office space, and that seemed to be inconsistent. For òffices it seemed to be high. PC-317 Page 3 (16) PC-317 Page 4 MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION (17) COM. CLAUDY noted that whereas forty-three spaces were re- quired for the size of the building, they seemed to be ending up with only thirteen. Assistant Planning Director Cowan said that the net parking spaces represented a reciprocal agreement; and he added that Staff felt that the projection of 150 ratio for office was re- strictive (based on Cal-Trans information), and that it was still being used by a number of communities. COM. CLAUDY brought up the fact that because ~f the parking the trees did not seem to be getting enough moisture to the ¡root systems. I IICHR. GATTO was told, in response to his question, that the parking spaces were 9 ft. 6 in. spaces. Com. Koenitzer to approve l8-U-79, Standard Con- ditions #1 through #14; #15 through #16 per Staff memo with modifying Exhibit A to place µar~ing spaces in the rear of the driveway of the building as per recommendation of Staff Memo. Second: Com. Blaine AMENDMENT: Chr. Gatto, that H-Control have the discretion of dealing with parking space to save the trees and eliminate the dead-end; thus, deleting 1st sen- tence of Condition #17 in favor of a MINUTE ORDER to H-CONTROL. AMENDMENT PASSED UNANIMOUSLY MOTION: PASSED UNANIMOUSLY MOTION: VOTE: MOTION: VOTE: VOTE: Com. Claudy to approve Negative Declaration. Second: Com. Adams PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 5-0 5-0 5-0 Assistant City Attorney Kilian asked the Commissioners if they were sure they had made the four findings (not injurious to health, safety and welfare) ,and adopted the sub-conclusions found in the Staff Report regarding the site design -- parking ingress and egress for Mr. Dempster's benefit. , !MINUTE ORDER TO H-CONTROL: Request that they change the parking configuration and eliminate the dead-end parking to a parking area; and, address the concerns brought out during the meeting, maximizing the landscaping and tree protection to create the most direct and easy movement for the cars, and to provide at least five parking spaces in those spaces. Second: Com. Blaine VOTE: APPROVAL PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 5-0 MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM #9, Application 26-U-74 (revised) of BETHEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: AMENDMENT OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED USE PERMIT to operate a primary school covering preschool through the thirï grade at the existing Bethel Lutheran Church and ENVIRON- MENTAL REVIEW: The Environmental Review Committee recommend the granting of a Negative Declaration. Said property is located on the southwest corner of Finch Avenue and Sorenson Avenue in a BQ(Quasi-Puólic Duilding) zoning district. Firs hearing. Assistant Planner Piasecki reviewed the Staff Report and sug gested that they were talking about an amendment to a Use Permit, there should not be any difficulty, except that con- sideration for future noise and congestion might well be a part of approval. He called attention to request to build a a single-story storage building to replace a metal storage unit, and also development and expansion of playground facil ities to the south. Ms. Barbara Myers, Brookdale Estates Homeowners Association, led the contingent of neighbors concerned and also opposing the request. Mentioning the Mercury-News article, Ms. Meers strongly objected to Rn amended Use Permit. Since they éz-", pected noige, intrusion of the children into their area, increased traffic congestion, and increased acerbatiòn of already present high school noise, traffic and congestion, she asked that the Commissioners deny the amended Use Permit. Mr. Wayne Lichtenþ!rger, regident of Brookdale Estates, said that he agreed with Ms. Myers, and asked the Commissioners not to approve the amendment to the Use Permit under any cir cumstances.. The Rev. James Erickson, Business Administrator, Bethel Lutheran, said that the extended care mentioned in the appl'- cation was for a few students who had to arrive early of necessity and also had to stay late after classes -- the time extended for students already attending classes -- and only seven children were involved; arriving at 7:00 p.m. an staying ~ntil 6:00 p.m. The Rev. Erickson said that their principãl had expended much time and effort contacting the appropriate authorities to discuss all aspects of the schoo operation, had received clearance from each of them. ' A con flict prevented her from being present. However, she had discussed the matter with Staff also. It was her under- standing that all questions, applications, standards, per- mits from the state and county, and other interested partie had been satisfied -- all areas having been checked before school commenced. COM. BLAINE questioned future plans and number of students in each classroom. Referring to the newspaper article, she explained she knew the news was not always accurate. PC-317 Page 5 (18) PC-317 Page 6 MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION (18) The Rev. Ericksen explained that expansion of the student body and physical plant was a dream for some remote future time -- the present thrust being operating with a 20-student class size (160 children at the most). He advised the pre-school would continue to occupy the present site. The Rev. Harold W. Brown, Pastor of Bethel Lutheran, said Bethel, as a congregation, had authorized operation of a school to the 3rd grade for the present time and going be- yond that would require a new vote and mandate of the congre- gation to possibly increase the present classroom area by an- other story, which they understood would require a new appli- 'cation to the City of Cupertino. He pointed out that the amendment to the Use Permit noted "church-related activities" and they so regarded their school endeavor. They felt that clarification, through the amendment to the permit, was nec- essary so they could continue their school. For Com. Blaine he explained that the pre-school was in a separate buiiding with a separate playground. !At the request of the CommLssioners, PaStor Brown located the ¡various classrooms, the activity and functions of the area presently under use. He then outlined the plans for improving ¡the existing area under the use permit being clarified. Ms. Myers and Mr. Lichtenberger returned to the podium to point out that it was felt, by the unified group of home- owners in the area, that the impact on their daily lives would be greater and create jeopardy at such time as the Bethel Lutheran came back to the Planning Commission for approval of plans for expansion of the facility. !ie' asked, again, that the Amendment to the Use Permit be denied. They asked for Environmental Impact Study, and detailed des- criptions of the buildings and plans prior to granting the permit. Ms. Myers, Brookdale Estates, said that after reading the criteria for issuance of the Use Permit, they were challenging the appropriateness of the church's compliance to all the statements and considerations of the original permit -- the ,church property being for religious worship and related Imeetings. There was nothing contained therein that permitted them a large commercial school development. The space avail- able was insufficient to accomodate expansion; and, she noted that the two-lane street was already at capacity due to the high school across the street and multi-family dwellings on either side of the church. Further, she estimated that the market value of the homes in Brookdale Estates would be ad- versely affected by the expansion of the church property. A 20% loss would represent over $400,000 loss to owners: In response to COM. BLAINE, Ms. Myers said there were child- re.n in the development. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION PC-317 Page 7 (19) PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: Com. Koenitzer. Passed: Second: Com. Blaine 5-0 COM. ADAMS clarified that they were only looking for the expansion of use of the existing space. Agsistant Planner Piasecki advised that was true except for the one request to expand into the conference center on the premiseg. The number of students, the size and location and. use of the proposed storage area, the extension of the playground, and the use of the playground area were discussed in depth.' In the absence of absolute size of building information, the commissioners felt R little apprehension. The play area defined again by Pastor Brown, and the fact that the play area would be used with supervision was established. COM. ADAMS related his experience with a loéal school and indicated that the situation was not too unpleasant. At times, if intrusion into private property happened, the school personnel were more than willing to control it. COM. KOENITZER and COM BLAINE said they would like to see exhibits detailing the buLlding, the parameters of the playL ground area and uses. COM. BLAINE suggested dropping the storage building from the application since there was not an immediate need to replace the existing metal storage unit. PUBLIC HEARINGS REOPENED: Com. Blaine. PASSED: Second: Com. Koen"ltz r 5-0 Pastor Browh answered the Commis~ioners qllestions by ~tating that they were under the jurisdiction of state and county authorities, and, of course, had to meet city re- requirements. He stated that the architect responsible for the original church buildings would also be working on the i landscaping for the playground area -- the present play are~ being the parking lot of the church until such tLme as they I were permitted to plant grass. He stated that the storage would be used for Christmas, Easter, Youth Group aod sunday School program materials and props. The southerly end of the proposed improvement (beyond the gragsed in area) wag only in the planning stage. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 5-0 CHR. GATTO indicated the point of view of the Commissioners was that they were afraid of the piecemeal development of the site and a lack of proper definition of size and tlSe of property; and, he suggested that the two issues be dealt with separately -- allowing the present amendment, but ex- pecting some documentation on present and futllre plans. PC-3l7 Page 8 MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION (20) MOTION: VOTE: MOTION: Com. Claudy, recommend Declaration of 26-U-74 Second: Com. Adams PASSED UNANIMOUSLY approval of the Negative Revision. 5-0 Com. Claudy, Approval 26-U-]4 (Revision) subject to Standard Conditions #1 through #14; #15 as outlined in Staff Report; #16 modified to read that the 2nd sentence shall read: "...the private school shall be operated in conformance with state and county require- ments, and shall be limited to K through 3rd grade..."; #17 as stated in the Staff Report; #l8 replaced with the following condition, "...enrollment in grades K through 3 shall be Ilmited to RO (eighty) students.."; #i9 changed to read: "...organized school activities and organized games, shall not take place in the southernmost part of the site and is not approved at this time (which refers to the undøveloped area ad- jacent to the paved parking area), subject to the Findings and Sub conclusions of the Staff Report. Second: Com. Adams COM. CLAUDY explained that he was speaking of games such as voliyball, hasketball, hopscotch, or any group games. Children running out spontaneously, without permission, would be subject to the discipline of the teachers or supervisors. AMENDMENT TO MOTION: Com. Koenitzer, Condition #21 added to read:..."extended daycare shall be limited to the students of the school and the hours of operation from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. AMENDMENT FAILED for lack of a Second. VOTE ON MOTION: PASSED: AYES: Chr. Gatto, Com. Koenitz~r 4-1 Claudy, Adams, NOES: Com. Blaine COM. BLAINE and CHR. GATTO advlsed Ms. Myers that it was her right to inform the Sheriff's Department and the City if there were infractions of the terms of the permit. "And, it was em- phasized that one-time events with high noise levels wouid not be considered infractions. Assistant City Attorney Kilian advised the Commissioners and the Applicant that this being a final decision of the Planning Commission, it was the perogative of the Applicant to Appeal the decision in writing to the City Council within 5 (five) days commencing on September 13, 1979. A lack of appeal with- in that period would make the decision of the Planning Com- mission binding on all parties. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION PC-317 Page 9 (21) RECESS ll:15 p.m. RECONVENED 11:30 p.m. ITEM #10, Applications l5-Z-79, 19-U-79, and 19-TM-79 of SEM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. (KENSINGTON SQUARE): REZONING approximately 1.8 gross acres from Rl-lO (Residential, single-family, 10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size and RJ (Residential, multipl& family) to P (Planned Deve!opment with commercial and office use intent) zone or whatever zon may be deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission; USE PERMIT to construct office buildings and private racquet ball facilities consisting of a total of approximately 21,000 sq. ft.; TENTATIVE MAP to subdivide the subject property into 19 condominium office parcels and one parcel to be held in common ownership and ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration. Said property is located on the north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard approximately 300 ft. westerly of Portal Avenue. First hearing. Tentative City Council hearing date - October 1, 1979. Assistant Planning Director Cowan exhibited drawings of the proposed development, a condominium office development and a first of that design and intent for Cupertino. He called attention to the joint use of the Top Furniture, store drive way to the east and the possibility of connection of the property to the west at a future date. Landscaping would he sufficient to screen the style of architecture as dif- ferent than that of surrounding buildings on Stevens Creek. COM. CLAUDY called attention to the area behind that was only marginally developed -- parking for the furniture store. Mr. Robert Linde~fer (phonetic). representing SEM Development I Company, Inc., said th& unusual architectural deaign, the I racquetball site, the saunas, were for the specifi~ use. of : owners within tne complex -- a complex that represented th.e~1 first of its kind on the_ Pení.nsula, whose time h.ad come in his esti'mation, and which. represe.nted an opportunity for those looking for offí.ce space to acquire it at an a[ford- able price. Mr. Dave Semis, the developer, had done a num- ber of projacts in Santa Clara, w£th one across from the Santa Clara Police Departme-nt and Muni.cipal Building. They were proud of the spacious, landscaped grounds -- only 27% of the building space be-ing take.n up with structures. He. mentioned the controversy of what the. architectural style of Cupertino seemed to be and said that they had met with approval from business men interested in purchasing office space from them. The average office would be about 750 sq. ft., except for Mr. Semi's office, which would be 2,600 sq. ft. and would house the main office of SEM Development Co., Inc. PC-Jl7 Page 10 MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING OF THE P~ANNING COMMISSION (22 ) COM. ADAMS was assured the racquetball facility and sauna were for the sole use of members (owners) and guests and not for public admission. The use of the property would be during the daytime mainly -- night use at the election of the particular owner who wished to work. COM. KOENITZER noted there were two-story structures. But, it was pointed out that the roof lines gave the appearance of two -story, but the buildings were in fact one-story except for the structures ho\\sing the courts, saunas', and Mr. Semis' offIce. Out of 16,000 sq. ft. ba~ically 2,600 sq. ft. would be 2nd floor. COM. ADAMS and CHR. GATTO were told that there were no facIlities for public commercial sales on the premises be- cause most of the space would be used for professional office use, consulting, etc.. In other words, no retail sales uses. A massage parlour could only come under local ordinances. However, Mr. Dempster sald he did not think of it as a pos- sihility. Even though purchasing office space in a condo- minium, one was still restricted by Cupertino rules and regulations; and, in addition, in response to COM. BLAINE, he said it was possible to have restriction in the covenants governing the owner's association. Assistant City Attorney would need a Use Permit and would be subject to a general CG zone. Kilian interjected the fact that one for operations within the project the restrictions of the permit under Associate Planner Piasecki said that office use should be permitted but personal service establishment should not be permitted. Assistant City Attorney Kilian pointed out that personal ser- vice establishments do not require use permits --shoe repair, bakery goods, tailor shops, cleaners and laundry shops are all allowed without use permits PUBLIC HEARINGS CLOSED: By Agreement, 5-0 VOTE: Com. Claudy, approve the granting of a Negative Declarati.on. Second: Com. Adams PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 5-0 MOTION: COM. KOENITZER, noting that use of the health facilities would occur during evening~ asked what control would keep the public out. Mr. Dempster advised that gates and checking by personnel or issued pass cards. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION: Com. Claudy, approval of 19-U-79 subject to Standard Conditions #1 through #14; Conditions #15, #16, & # 17 as outlined in the Staff Report; additional Condition #18 as per "Additional con- dition for Application 19-TM-79" dated September 10, 1979 per Staff Recommendation; in accordance with the Findings and Sub conclusions of the Staff Report. Second: Com. Adams VOTE: PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 5-0 MOTION: Com. Claudy, recommend approval of 19-TM-79 sub- ject to the Standard Conditions #1 through #14; Conditions #15, #16, & #17 from the Staff Report; Condition #18 added from Staff Memo of September 10, 1979; subject to Findings and Sub conclusions outlined in the Staff Report. Second: Com. Adams VOTE: PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 5-0 Item #10 to go to City Council on October 1, 1979. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: APPROVAL OF MINUTES May l4, May 16, Planning Commission Minutes, approved as submitted. Planning Commission Minutes, approved as SUbmitted.! Com. Adams abstained - absent from meeting. Planning Commission Minutes, approved with followin correction: I May 29, Page ~, change Magic Walk to Magic Wok - Com. Blaine. Page 2, last line, change Simi Springs to Seven Springs Page 3, change reference to Otis Ford property. Page 6, par. 3, name spelling to Nancy Erhertert. MOTION TO APPROVE AS CORRECTED: Com. Claudy. Second: Com. Koenitzer. PASSED 4-0 Com. Gatto - absent from meeting Abstain: -August 27 Planning Commission Minutes: Page 1, Motion to Approve Vote 2-0 from 3-0 MOTION TO APPROVE: Com. Claudy. Second, Com. PASSED 3-0 Com. Adams and Com. Koenitzer Blaine. Abstained: - absent from meeting. REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR COM. KDENTIZER advised the Staff that over a couple of months he had noticed that the City Council seemed to be PC-317 Page 11 (23) . PC-317 Page 12 MINUTES SEPTEMRER 12, 1979 RECONVENED REGULAR MEETINC qF THE PLANNING COMMISSION (24) changing one or two line-s, or in some cases, wording of Planning Commission approvals. H" continued th.at. since. ther did not have the Resolutions. at the time of-approval, it was hard to figure out what th.e.y we·re· changing, He requested that Staff note these changes and report them back during the Report of the Planning Director part of each meeting. He was referring to this being done more to hear what they had to say but not a detaileù description of what and why. He felt it woùld be valuable to match it with Planning Commission approvals and check whether or not they are still looking at things the way the Council does. . A discussion of the pending agendas for the immediate future was .discussed. It was agreed to include all the Items and hope [or continuations or withdrawals.-to pare down tIle size of the agenùas. UNFINISHED BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT 11:45 p.m. Adjourned to September 27, 1979, 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room. ATTEST: {b@.: Ci -y Clerk APPROVED: P1.