Reso 189 File No. 46-V-63
PLANNING COMMISSION RFSOLUTION NO. 189
• WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received
the application cf Allen L. Chadwick for a VARIANCE for a total sign
area of 361 square feet where Ordinance allows 169 square feet; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to
support his said application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and
other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the VAR-
IANCE be and the same is hereby approved, subject to the following:
1 . Rear signs have a maximum height of 11 feet.
2. Variance expires at such time as additional development
takes place on this property.
3. Minimum light shining to the rear of rear signs.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the report of findings attached hereto are approved and
adopted, and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify
the parties affected by this decision.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Cu-
• pertino, State of California, this 13th day of January, 1964, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Adamo, Rampy, Small, Thomson, Frolich
NOES: Commissioners: Fitzgerald
ABSENT: Commissioners: Snyder
/s/ Donald Frolich
Chairiic.n, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
/s/ R. S. Shook
Secretary, Planning Commission
•
-1-
File No. 46-V-63
REPORT OF FINDINGS •
The application for a VARIANCE on behalf of ALLEN L. CHADWICK shows:
1. That there are special conditions or exceptional characteris-
tics in the nature of the property to be affected or that it ' s loca-
tion, or it ' s surroundings are such as will permit the Commission to
make a determination that a literal enforcement of the Ordinance would
result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships; and
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and
3. That the granting of the application will not materially af-
fect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in
the neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the applica-
tion, and that the use of said property in the manner which it is pro-
posed to be used will not be materially detrimental to the public wel-
fare or injurious to the value of property or improvements located in
said surroundings.
411
I •
-2-