Reso 121 •
•
File No. 24-J-62
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 121
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City . of Cupertino received •
the application of Am.coe. Sign Co.
for a VARIANCE for 5 . signs 113" x 7 3" each., in e-xc-e'ss of maximum as.
perordinance. 89;'• northeast corner:. o.f Portal &, .Stevens. Creek Blvd.
• ; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has, ht, met the burden of proof re-
quired to support his said application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: •
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, . exhibits and other
evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the VARIANCE be;
maxim, and the same is, arm-ix, hereby recommended for approval .to TE.e .
City Council Of the City of Cupertino for appropriate -Action, subject
to the tei'uus and conditions which are attached hereto and made •a part
hereof as Exhibit "A" .
1. Planter boxes at base. of sign previously- agreed to- by builder-
be . constructed and planted to satisfaction of Building Inspector before
building permit for sign additions are: issued.
�. That. when signs areerect.ed, all non-conforming. signs be removed.
0 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
ba •
That the report of findings attached hereto/approved and adopted,
and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify the parties
affected by this decision.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertinc
State of California, thus 13th day of November- , 1962 , by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Fitzgerald., Frolich.,- Leonard, Rampy, Small, Snyde..r
NAYS: Commissioners: None •
ABSENT: Commissioners: Adam°
/s/ Charles K. Snyder
Chairman of the Planning Comm.
ATTEST:
Lawrence K. Martin
Secretary of the Planning Commission •
-1 •
-
File No.24-1,62
REPORT OF FIND:INGS
The application for a VARIANCE- on behalf of Atoe Sign CO, '
•
shows
1, That there . are ,special .conditions- or exceptional characteristics
in the nature of the property to be affected. or that 'it ' s location, or
it ' s surroundings are such as will pe_r.rtiit the Commission to make a deter-
mination that a literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in
practical difficulties or •unnecessary. hardships; and
•
2e That the granting of the application is necessary for the pre.-
servation and enjoyment of substantial property :rights; and
•
3e That the granting of the application will not materially affect
adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the application, •
and that the use of said property in the manner which . it is proposed to
be used will not be materially detrimental to tune public welfare or in-
juri ous to the value of property or improvelrient s located in said surr-
oundings,