Reso 102P
/
•
•
File No. 22-V-62
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 102
�' - WHEREAS, _ the Planning .Commission- of .the City of Cupertino received
i the application of GEORGE YAMA.OKA
for a VARIANCE for a sign 35' high where ordinance requires 20' ;
19675 StevensCreek Blvd. - Portal Plaza
and - .
WHEREAS, the applicant has, loclxmak, met the burden of proof re
quired to support his said application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other
evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the' VARIANCE be,'
xHz xbg, •and- the same is, XXx.MIX, hereby recommended for. approval to.- the •
City Council of the City of Cupertino for appropriate action, subject
to-the-'eels-arc -eenclitions-wkiei=1-are-attaeAec -herete-anc -made-a-part
h.epeGf as-Exht- Al .
to the following terms and conditions:
Landscaping at the discretion of the City Officials.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the report of findings attached hereto approved and adopted,
and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify the parties
affected by this decision.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertinc.:
State of California, this 12th day of March , 19 62, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Frolich, Leonard, Rampy, Small
NAYS: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Snyder
/s/ E. J. Small
Chairman of the Planning Comm.
ATTEST:
/s/ Lawrence K. Martin .
Secretary of the Planning Commission
° ill .
-1 -
File No. 22-V-62
REPORT OF FINDINGS •
`
The application for a VARIANCE on behalf of GEORGE YAMAOKA =,
•
shows:
1. That there are special conditions or. except.ional .characteristics
in the nature of the property to be affected or that it ' s location, or
it ' s surroundings are such as will permit the Commission to make a deter-
mination that a literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in
practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships; and
•
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the pre--
servation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and
3 . That the granting of the application will not materially affect
adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood -of the property which is the subject of the application,
and that the use• of said property -in the manner which it is proposed tp
be used -will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare. or in-
furious to the value of property or improvements located. in , said surr-
oundings. . .
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
--2-