Reso 091 File No, 20-V-62
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 9.1
WHEREAS; the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received-
the application of MAYFAIR MARKETS
for a VARIANCE for AN ADDITION OF 44 0" x 6 t 0" to an existing sign,
southwest -corner of East Estates and Stevens Creek Boulevard.'
•
and
•
WHEREAS, the applicant has, x , met the burden of proof re- •
quired to support his said application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other
evidence submitted in this. matter, the application for the VARIANCE be,
Rakxkx, and the same ' is, ±xxrugegy hereby recommended ' for approval to .the
City Council of the City of Cupertino for appropriate action, subject
t_e-thei-te G-aR -se19.ditielas-wh eh-ape-aaehed--H.ei-e e-axd-made-a-pact
h®reef-as-E�kib�t
to the following condition: That the variance is. granted .only fo:r•the
copy "Open 24 Hours" and will be removed otherwise .
•
411 BE IT FURTHER .RESOLVED:
•
That the report of findings attached hereto approved and adopted,
and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify the parties
affected by this decision.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino,
State of California, this 26th day of February , 19 62, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Frolich, Fitzgerald, Leonard, Rampy, Small
NAYS: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Adamo, Snyder
J. Small
Chairman of the 'Planning Comm.
ATTEST:
/s/ Lawrence K. Martin
Secretary of the Planning Commission
-1-
File Noe 20-V-62
REPORT OF FINDINGS •
The application ,for a VARIANCE on behalf of MAYFAIR MARKETS.
shows:
•
1. That there - are- spacial conditions or •exceptional characteristics
in the nature of the property to 'be affected`or that it ' s locatioh, r'orc
it ' s surroundings are such as will perigt the Commission to make a deter-
mination that a literal enforcement 'of' the Ordinance would result in
practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships;. and •
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of substantial 'property rights; and
3. That the granting of the application will not materially affect
adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the application.,-- .
and that the use of said property in the manner which it is- proposed--to
be use .-wi.1l.-not._be_..materially._detrime t ,l_to_ the_public welfare or in-
jurious to the value of property or improvements located in said surr-
oundings a located
•
•
•
•
•
•
.
•
-2-