Reso 050 File No. 1OV
• PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 50
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received.
the application of Camino Del Homes
for a VARIANCE for A lot 65 ft. wide where the ordinance requires
70 ft. ; 10534 N. Blaney Avenue
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has, biaamem met the burden of proof re-
quired to support his said application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other
vice submitted in this matter, the application for the VARIANCE be,
and the same is, XiXXXX, hereby recommended for approval to the
C t Council of the Cit, of Cupertino for appropriate action, ffa(NX
. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the report of findings attached hereto approved and adopted,
and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify the parties
affected by this decision.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino .
State of California, this 10th day of April. , 19 61 , by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Adam, Rio ;ar, Rampy, Small, Jnyde», Leonard
NAYS: Commissioners: None
II ABSENT: Commissioners: Fitch
/s Burrel Tenn::ro
Chairman of the Planning Comm.
ATTEST:
/s/ Lawrence K. Martin
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I
1
-1-
• File No. lOV
REPORT OF FINDINGS
The application for a VARIANCE on behalf of Camino Del Homes
shows:
1. That there are special conditions or exceptional characteristics
in the nature of the property to be affected or tnat it ' s location, or
it ' s surroundings are such as will permit the Commission to make a deter-
mination that a literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in
practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships; and
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and
3. That the granting of the application will not materially affect
adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the application,
and that the use of said property in the manner which it is proposed to
be used will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare cr in-
jurious to the value of property or improvements located in said surr-
oundings.
•
•
-2-