Loading...
Reso 2666 21-U-85 RESOLUTION NO. 2666 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN (IV EXISTING 1 ,000 SQ. FT. SINGLE-STORY HOUSE INTO A 1 ,750 SQ. FT. TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING. APPLICANT: Dave Hobson ADDRESS: 22655 Oak Crest, Cupertino, California 95014 SUBMITTED: May 28, 1985 LOCATION: South side of Granada Avenue approximately 100 ft. west of Imperial Avenue • FINDINGS AND SUBCONCLUSIONS: Approval is subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and the subconclusions as set forth in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of July 22, 1985. CONDITIONS: • 1-15. STANDARD CONDITIONS Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the special conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does exist, the special conditions as enumerated herein shall apply. • 16. APPROVED EXHIBITS That the recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits A 2nd Revision (Alternative 1) and B 1st Revision of Application 21-U-85 except as may be amended by special conditions enumerated herein. 17. USE LIMITATIONS The subject approval permits the proposed .structure to be used for office activities only. Other uses, such as commercial uses, are not permitted. le. PARKING Parking shall be provided at a ratio of 1 space for every 285 sq. ft. of gross floor area. 19. SQUARE FOOTAGE The applicant shall reduce the proposed office building ' to approximately 1 ,750 gross sq. ft. 1 S A CITY OF . CUPERTINO City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 Telephone: (408) 252-4505 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMEND- ING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a USE PERMIT, as stated on Page 2; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application meets the following requirements: a. That the use or uses are in conformance with the general plan and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. b. That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. c. That the proposed use will not generate a level of traffic over and beyond that of the capacity of the existing street system. d. That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use nor injurious to property and improvements in the' neighbor- hood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application of the USE PERMIT is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions stated on Page 2; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the aforementioned findings be approve and adopted, and that the Secretary be, and is hereby directed to notify the parties affected by this decision. S Planning Commission Resolution No. 2666 (continued) 21-U-85 20. JOINT DRIVEWAY 111 The applicant shall sign an agreement to participate in a joint driveway easement with the adjoining easterly property owner at such time as in the future as said adjoining property owner is obligated to participate in a similar agreement. The intent is that the applicant and adjoining property owner share a driveway in the future which extends from Granada Avenue to parking located at the rear of the properties. 21. STREET LIGHTS Street lights shall be consistent with the standards outlined on Page 24, Section 12a of the Monta Vista Design Guidelines. 22. MODIFICATION OF THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN In the event that the applicant or subsequent property owner shall desire to make any -minor change, alteration or amendment in the approved development plan or building permit, a written request and revised development plan or building permit shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development. If the Director makes a finding that the changes are minor and do not affect the general appearance of the area or the • interests of owners of property within or adjoining the development area, the Director may certify the change on the revised plan. If such approval is withheld the applicant may appeal to the Planning Commission. If the changes are material , the Director shall submit said changes to the Planning Commission for approval . If the change is denied by the Planning Commission, the applicant may appeal to the City Council as provided in Ordinance 652 of the City of Cupertino. If the change is approved, an appeal my be made by an interested party. Further, any member of the City Council may request a hearing before the City Council , said request to be made within ten (10) days from the date of approval - when the change has been approved by the Planning Commission. 2 . LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The applicant shall prepare and implement a coordinate landscaping plan involving landscaping beds adjoining the common property line for the property located to the west of the project site. The coordinating landscaping plan shall involve the removal of a fence line and the extension of the landscaping bed as illustrated on Exhibit A 1st Revision, Alternative 1 by approximately 2 410 ft. into the applicant 's project site. The curb for the 2 ft. extension will act as a wheel stop for parked cars. 2 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2666 (continued) 21-U-85 The applicant shall omit a written agreement between the property owners for the property to the west and the applicant 's site guaranteeing that the common property line would be kept clear and free of fencing and jointly maintained based upon an agreed upon maintenance responsibility. The intent of the Condition is to provide a landscaped bed separating parking for the applicant 's project and the adjoining project t❑ the west. The City staff shall the authority to approve the landscaping plan and aforementioned letter of agreement- The applicant shall attempt to coordinate a landscaping plan with the property owner to the south whereby additional trees and other landscaping materials could be planted on the southerly property. The City staff shall determine if reasonable attempt was made to accomplish the off-site landscaping. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22th day of July, 1985, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll-call vote: AYES: Commissioners Adams, Mackenzie, Sorensen, Chairman Claudy NAYS: Commissioner Szabo • ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/Robert Cowan /s/John Claudy Robert Cowan John Claudy, Chairman Planning Director Planning Commission