Reso 2553 •
•
15-U-79 (Revised)
1111 RESOLUTION NO. 2553
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO •
RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A USE PERMIT MODIFICATION
TO ALLOW ELECTRONICALLY AMPLIFIED BAND MUSIC AND
DANCING IN AN EXISTING COCKTAIL LOUNGE.
APPLICANT: John Vidovich (Edward Yamaoka)
• ADDRESS: 1307 South Mary Avenue, Sunnyvale, California 94087
SUBMITTED: August 17, 1984
LOCATION: Portal Plaza Shopping Center on the Northeast
Quadrant of Portal . Avenue and Stevens Creek Boulevard
FINDINGS: •
1. The location of proposed high activity, late night
entertainment use is in close proximity to the adjoining
residential area and would result in detrimental activities
such as late night traffic leaving the site and noise from
the patronage in the parking lot area.
2. Due to the location of the proposed activity, the General
Plan policy of encouraging these types of uses to locate in .
larger complexes such as Vallco Park and Town Center should
be adhered to.
4
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of September; 1984, at a regular •
meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino,
State of California, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Adams, Claudy, Chairperson Blaine
NAYS: Commissioners Koenitzer, Szabo •
-
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST: ' APPROVED:
•
/s/.James H. Sisk /s/ Sharon Blaine
•
4110 . - James H. Sisk Sharon Blaine, Chairperson
Planning Director Planning Commission
CITY OF CUPERTINO
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue410
Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone (408) 252-4505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING
DENIAL OF A USE PERMIT.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a use permit, as stated on Page 2; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has not met the burden of proof required to support
said application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application does not meet
all of the following requirements : �.
a) That the use or uses are in conformance with the General
Plan and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses
specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed
use is to be located.
b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape
to accommodate the proposed use.
c) That the proposed use will not generate levels of traffic
over and beyond that of the capacity of the existing street
system.
d) That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the
health and safety, peace, morals and general welfare of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such
proposed use not injurious to property and improvements
in the neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other
evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the use permit
be, and the same is hereby denied; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the findings quoted above and on Page Two be approved and adopted,
and that the Secretary be, and is hereby directed to notify the parties
affected by this decision.
ames H. Sisk
Planning Director
6