Reso 2572 13-TM-84
RESOLUTION NO. 2572
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 6.7 ACRES INTO 31 PARCELS
RANGING IN SIZE FROM 6,000 . 50. FT. TO APPROXIMATELY
9,900 Se!. FT.
APPLICANT: , The Alden Company (Hoo Gee Hom)
ADDRESS: 411 Borel Avenue, Suite 410,
San Mateo, California, 94402
SUBMITTED: August 31, 1984
LOCATION: Between the terminus of September Drive
and November Drive, approximately 800 ft.
west of Stelling Road
FINDINGS AND SUBCONCLUSIONS:
Approval is subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and
the subconclusions as set forth in the minutes. of the Planning
Commission meeting of October 8, 1984.
CONDITIONS:
1-15. STANDARD CONDITIONS
Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not
III conflict with the special conditions enumerated herein.
In the event a conflict does exist, the special
conditions as enumerated herein shall apply.
16. APPROVED EXHIBITS
That the recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits
A and B of , Application 13-TM-84 except as may be amended
by special conditions enumerated herein.
17. CASH DEPOSIT
The applicant shall contribute a cash deposit toward
constructing the access road from. Orogrande over the
Highway 85 Frontage Road across Regnart Creek to the
adjoining property to the east. The amount of the cash
deposit shall be based upon the applicant's proportionate
share of acreage, of developable land in the area
including the applicant' s site, and the two adjoining .
parcels to the east as determined by the City Engineer.
18. LOT WIDTH
All parcels shall equal a minimum lot width of 60 ft.
measured at the front building setback line.
1
CITY OF CUPERTINO
City Hall , 103007orre Avenue
Cupertino , Calif'drnia 95014
Telephone: (408'), 252-4505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP
WHEREAS , the attached application has been submitted to the City
of. Cupertino requesting approval of a tentative map ; and
WHEREAS , the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing
in regard to the application; and
WHEREAS , the Planning Commission, has duly considered and heard all
evidence submitted in regard to said application; and
WHEREAS , the necessary public notices have been given as required
by the subdivision and procedural ordinances of the City of
Cupertino.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED :
1. That the Planning Commission. makes the following findings :
41)
a. That the proposed map is consistent with the general and
specific plans .
b. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision
is consistent with the general and specific plans .
c. That the site is physically suitable for the type of
development.
d. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density
of development.
e . That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements
are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat.
f . That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
are not likely to cause serious public health problems .
g. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements , acquired by the public at
large , for access through or use of , property within the pro-
posed subdivision.
P%ANAING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2572 (CONTINUED) 13-TM-84
19. BUILDING PAD HEIGHTS
Building pad heights shall not exceed the pad heights
illustrated on Exhibit B by more than one foot.
20. COMBINE LOT 32 WITH LOT 31
Unless purchased by an adjacent property owner, Parcel 32
shall be combined with Parcel 31 to avoid creating a
legal lot of record which would be difficult to develop.
21. VEHICULAR ACCESS
If vehicular access rights exist over the easement from
Stelling Road through Parcel 32 to the site, all
construction vehicular access shall utilize this route to
gain access to the site.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of October, 1984, at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino,
. State of California, by the following roll call vote:-
AYES:
� Commissioners Adams, Mackenzie, Sorensen, Szabo,
Chairman Claudy®
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
•
ATTEST: APPROVED:
/s/ James H. Sisk /s/ John Claudy
James H. Sisk John Claudy, Chairman
Planning Director Planning Commission
2