Reso 24993-U-84
RESOLUTION NO. 2499
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A USE PERMIT TO EXPAND AN
EXISTING 5,000 SO. FT. OFFICE BUILDING BY ADDING
APPROXIMATELY 6,500 SO. FT. FOR A TOTAL OF
11,500 SO. FT.
APPLICANT: Lawrence Guy
ADDRESS: 20432 Silverado Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014
SUBMITTED: March 2, 1984
LOCATION: South side of Silverado Avenue approximately 140
ft. east of De Anza Boulevard
------------------------------------------------------------------
FINDINGS
The Planning Commission finds that General Plan Amendment
1-GPA-80, Policy 6 a(6) was misinterpreted in terms of
calculating permitted floor area. The ".33 FAR-+ 1,000 sq. ft.
or .40 FAR whichever is lesser" policy should apply to the entire
project site rather than individual properties which comprise the
project site. The total permitted building area should be
10,760+- sq. ft. not 11,500 sq. ft.
11
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of April, 1984, at a regular
adjourned meeting' of the Planning Commission of the City of
Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Adams, Claudy, Koenitzer, Szabo!
Chairperson Blaine
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
/s/ James H. Sisk
-------------------------
James H. Sisk
Planning Director
0
APPROVED:
/s/ Sharon Blaine
--------------------------
Sharon Blaine,.Chairperson
Planning Commission
C I T Y OF C 'U . P Ell R T I N 0
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone (408) 2521-4505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING.
DENIAL OF A USE PERMIT.
I
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the 'City of Cupertino received an application,
for a use permit, as stated on Page 2; and,
WHEREAS, the applicant has not met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and
j
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application does not meet all
of the following requirements.
a. That the use or uses are in conformance with the General Plan
and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically
permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located.
b. That the property involved is aequate in size and shape to accommodate
the proposed use.
i
C. That the proposed use will not generate levels of traffic over
and beyond that of tie capacity of the existing street system.
d. That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health
safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of such proposed use nor injurious
to property and improvements in the neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
I
That after careful consideration of maps; facts, exhibits and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application for the use permit be, and the same
is hereby denied; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the findings quoted above and on Page Two be approved and adopted,
and that the Secretary be, and is hereby directed to notify the parties
affected by this decision.
i
Rob ttA Cowan
r Assistant Planning Director (Continued on Page 2)
d