Reso 25004-U-04
k7ESOLUTION NO. 2500
Or THE PLANNING COMMISSION bP THE CITY or CUPERTINO
DENYING AN APPLICATION rokt A USE 1: thH t T TO dt'ERATE A
Dk7I VE-THROUGH SERVICE WINDOW IN LOWC�RT WITH AN
EXISTING TAk.S-Wf NESTAUhANT.
APPLICANT: k:entucky Pried Chitken (Lem Overset)
AbDkt�S5: 19q k i t st Street; Suite 212, Los Altos, CA ��C)
SU+MITTEb: March 16, 1984
L-OCATION: Northeast corner of Silverado Avenue and
South be AntA boulLevard
-------------------------------------
k=indings:
i. Beni al is subject to the findings as set forth on PAda lind
subcbnclusions As set forth in the minutes of the PlAhhlhd
Commission meeting of April It, 1984.
2. Thu �l Anni ng Commission finds the proposed drive-tht-6Udk
window to be in conflict with Criteria 2P, 2D, 4b and 7p atg
contained in th.e ' gui del i hes for development of df-i ve—thrbUdh
facilities adopted by City Cbuncil on April 2, 1994.
----==----------
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of April, 1984, at a t-6dUjar
adjourned meeting of the Planning Commission of the City, 64
Cupertino¢ State of California# by the followlhd roti tAli Vbtcl
AYES: CbMissieners Adams, Claudy, koenitier,
Chairper-son Blaine
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
AtTESt
James_ H. Sisk
James H.. Si sk --
pl �riri� ,g b� Fedor
APPROVED:
91 A66
Sharon Blaine
---------------------------
Sharon Blaine, Chairpersbh.
Planning Commission
II
C I T Y OF C U.P E R T I N O
�I
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, Californian 95014
Telephone (408) 252-4505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF'THE CITY OF CUPERTINO 1)ENYING A
ISE PERMIT.
II
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application.
for a use permit, as stated on Page 2; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has not met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and
II
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application does not meet all
of the following requirements. II
a. That the use or uses are in conformance with the General Plan
and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically
permitted in the zone in which t!he proposed use is to be located.
b. That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the proposed use.
C. That the proposed use will not generate levels of traffic over
and beyond that of tie capacity Pf the existing street system.
d. That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health
safety, peace, morals and generall welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of such proposed use nor injurious
to property and improvements inllthe neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: i'
That after careful consideration of maps)l facts, exhibits and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application for the use permit be, and the same
is hereby 'denied; and 11
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the findings quoted above and on Page Two be approved and adopted,
and that the Secretary be, and is herebydirectedto notify the parties
affected by this decision.
Rob t Cowan
Assistant Planning Director
�I
(Continued on Page 2)
II
16
•