Loading...
PC 07-22-91 CITY OF ClJPERTINJ S'lME OF CALIFæNlA 10300 Torre Avenue CUpertino, CA 95014 (408) 252-4505 MDU.ŒS œ '1BB ~ .......~..uG œ '1BB PlAIIIJK; CXHIISSIQf HBm QI JOLY 22, 1991 SAU71E '10 'mE FLP.G ROLL CALL: Cannissioners Present: Chairperson Mackenzie Vice C1air Fazekas Cannissioner Austin Cannissioner Mahaney Cannissioner Mann staff Present: Rebert Cowan, Director of Camlmity Develcpnent ~ Cornelius, City Clerk Travice Whitten, Deprt:y Director of Public IIbrks Cià:Iy W::>rdeU, City Planner Marilyn Norling, Housing and Sel:vioes Coordinator Cheryl Kershner, Deprt:y City Attorney API'R:NAL œ MIIÐŒS: M1l'IŒ: SEXnID VOlE: Can. Fazekas IIDIIed to ðku-<Ne the minutes of J'uly 8, 1991, as presented. Can. Mahaney Passed tu»"U'UfllIiIITS œ _ ~ 1'D!JIS: Itan 3: ADDlil"At";nn 8-u-91 John P. r..........;na r",rviaroar.. MI'I.....-..::uL _ Mr. Cowan stated that he had received a letter ñan the attorney representing the çliœnt, John P. Gad1ina Landsœpe Management, requesting that Item No. 3 be a:ntinued. Deprt:y City Attorney Kershner stated tbat the çliœnt was not pi: s_tL and if Cannissiat did not amti.nue the itan, there C'OIÙd be a prcblem in the future. Mr. Cowan stated that t:he City wculcI start a CXJde enf~II"",L acticn in the 1Æ!IIntime. M1l'IŒ: Can. Mann IIDIIed to amti.nue oonsi.derat.i.oo of Itan No. 3 for bio ¡,¡ee œ and that Code Enf~....d. initiate an abatement process. ~ PIRtiI!G CXHŒSSICN MDCŒS ~1lA'" MeetiDg of July 22, 1991 Page 2 At that time the a¡:plicant entered ChaniJer and Can. MaIm withdrew the nDtion. Item No.7: ADDliœHnn 26-u-90 Nelson Chao - Mr. Cowan stated that staff requested that Item No. 7 be oontinued to the meeting of August 12, 1991. KJI'ICN: SEXnID: VOlE: Can. MaIm IIDWd to oontinue Item No. 7 to the meeting of August 12, 1991. Can. Mahoney Passed A gentlemm in the audience stated that the a¡:plicant dJes want it heard as he feels that the case has been mishandled. MJI'ICN: SEXnID: VOlE: MJI'ICN: SEXnID: VOlE: Can. MaIm IIDWd to nHJPeIl the a¡:plication and cancel the previous nDtion to CX>Iltinue the matter. Can. Mahoney passed Can. MaIm IIDWd that if there was not time to amsider Item No.8, it 'AOI1ld be cxmtinued to the meeting of August 12. Can. Mahoney passed Foll~ discussion, the nDtion and secorxi were ameOOed to set oonsideration of Item No. 8 for the meeting of August 12. '!he dj,eJded nDtion was aà::¥ed unaninDusly. ŒAL <XMDŒCM'ICJIS: Linda Stuckey, P. O. Box 1115, CUpertilJc, addressed Camlission regarding the Saratoga CountJ:y Club ~v¡,.vdðl to ext:em their <Flf 0JUrBe fran nine 1x>les to eighteen 1x>les. She stated that the Saratoga Plarming Camlission <pes out to the site and reviews the ~~. 'Ibis appears to be quite helpful in making cpx1 decisions. She stated she 'AOI1ld like CUpertilJc' s Plarming Camlission to amsider such action as policy. She particularly cited St. .:1osEiP1' s Olurc:h property. Can. Mahoney stated that 'AOI1ld ~ '<IIOrth discussing and requested that the item be pIt at a future agenda for amsideration. Can. Austin and MaIm CX>Ilcurred. ~ aHfiSSICIi' MnI11ES /lAJ11- IetÏDJ of July 22, 1991 P8ge 3 PœLIC IIBMUIDI: 1. A ;plicatia1 No(s): A ;pliœnt : Pì.<-p=ty OWner: Project IDeation: 3-Z-91 Deep Cliff Golf Course Peter 1IuI::back, Trustee 10700 Clubbouse Lane cœsIIERATICIi' 'IO REZCIi'E ~te1y 53 acres gross £ran Agricultural Single-family Residential (Al) to Private Recreational or other such zoning classification as deellled aw<-l.¥Liate by the Planning Camlission or City Council. Rh.ff l?re£ootaHnn: Chairperson Mackenzie turned the Jœetinq over to Vice Chair Fazekas. 'D1ree cx:mnissioners, Austin, Mahoney, and Mackenzie, stated a amflict of interest because of ownership of property within a 300 ft. area. As it was necessary for one of these cx:mnissioners to vote on the a¡;:plication, each of the three drew a straw. Based on the result, it was det:eImined that Can. Mahoney '<o'CIÙd vote on the a¡;:plication¡ hc7.iever, he CDUld not take part in any discussion. Deputy City Attorney Kershner infoDDBd cx:mnissioners that it '<o'CUld take all three voting IIIE!IIiJers to vote "yes" in order for a J1Dti.on to pass. Can. Austin and Chairperson Mackenzie left 0IarrtJer. Following review of the staff LEPOtL, Acting Chair Fazekas qø¡ed the ¡;AJblic hearing. He stated that each mc.,'-'= of the ¡;AJblic '<o'CUld be limited to five minutes. AIDlicant PresentaHnn: Eric Bracher, 19542 Chardonnay Court, Saratoga, and one of the l'L<-p=Ly owners, requested a mininun 90 day amtinuance.. As no one else £ran the ¡;AJblic wished to speak, Acting Chair Fazekas announced that the ¡;AJblic hearing was closed. SI!XX:tID : VOlE : Can. Mimn 11DVed that staff initiate a ¡;AJblic hearing for appraximately 90 days £ran this date. ('Ihis '«IUld be the first Planning Camlission meeting in Oct:àJer, which is scheduled for 0ct:àJer 14.) Qn. Fazekas Pessed (3-0) M:n'ICIi' : Can. Austin and Chairperson Maclœnzie re-entered 0IarrtJer. 2. A ;plication No( s) : A ;plicant: Pt"q)erty OWner: Project IDeation: 4-Z-91 CUpertioo Hills SWim & Ra~ Club Rebert: and Sherry Me1bye 22090 Rae Lane PUHIIlC a:HfiSSIœ MIICŒS F""J11..r Meeting of July 22, 1991 Pðge 4 CI:NSIIERATIœ '10 REZCNE ~tely 2.99 acres gross fran Agricultural Single-famai1y Residential (Al) to Private Recreational or other such zoning classification as dee1"ed élwLUI:'áate by the Planning Cmmissicn or City Council. ~..ff Presentation: Acting Chair Fazekas stated that the same three cx:mnissioners 'NCUld need to abstain because of oonflict. Each of them is a IIIeI'!ber of the CUpertino Hills SWim am RaCXIUet Club. Following the drawing of the straws, Can. Austin remained in ChaIòJer to vote while Can. Mahoney am Mackenzie left. Director of CCrrm.mity Developnent Cowan reviewed his staff report. Acting Chair Fazekas opened the public hearing am stated that each speaker IoIOUJ,d be limited to five minutes. Ed Lichtman, 21675 Regnart Road, CUpertino, requested that J1IEIIèers of the Club who 10Iere present stand. He stated that club 1I.""L.:a.S are in basic <Ii ......,11 cdllent with the inte1:pretation being given the wording of Policy 5-25 of the CUpertino General Plan. He stated the \\ICrding really means "enoourage". '!he rezoning, as proposed, 'oIOIÙd limit future flEÐdbility. IJcr.mzoning is not enrouraging the club's cx>ntinued existence. '!his is not an incentive am, therefore, is against the General Plan. John Marshall, 11101 South Stelling RDad am club 1I,,",L.:a. expressed the following exmcems: lack of cx:mnmication fran the City (the club became aware of this zoning hearing '!hursday); the ~~ 00es not g:J with the General Plan. Nothing in CUpertino a:mpares with this club. He 'NCUld like to see incentives for devel\.¥"".It CXII1trol. Dick Wilson, 10850 Santa Teresa, charter IIIeI'!ber of the club, stated that the club is an outstaIxiing citizen of CUpertino. He saw no reason for change of zoning. M:.,L.:a.e want to J:'L.!.serve the club am open space. Charles M:>nahan, 11259 La Jolla Court, club IIIeI'!ber, said the club has a neighborhood-type spirit. He enjoys the facility am the financial growth of l!1EI1èership. Ed Licht:Jœn said four years aJP.. when he had joined the club, ",,",L.:a.Bhip oost $4,000; it is IrM valued at $6500. '!be City need not '4IIC1:'J:'Y about an offer the club cannot: refuse. He stated that the zaùng is a psycOOlogica1 factor. '!be IIIE!IIÌJerShip is backed by the laOO value. '!be proposed zoning makes IIIE!IIÌJerShip valueless. '!be ~..........8 of any future upzoning 'oIOIÙd be a tremendous ~\AA:ds. PIMtIIH; CIHfiSSICN HIlmES p..gI.1...r H.get.inq of July 22, 1991 P8I:J! 5 Bob ~losky, a club 1IIf!IIiJer, said that the City is currently ~ open space envL-uu,,"..ul. and would not let the IÆIIi:Jers upzane the ~'-\"=L Lt in the future. Although this is a private club, it is not exclusive. Dennis ~talœr, club mCIlbc.. and CUpertino resident, stated in regard to the f4~ change of zoning, if it isn't broken, à:m't fix it. '!be club is running SIIDOthly. If there is a prd>lem such as the October 1989 earthquake disaster and repairs had to be made, the club might have difficulty getting a loan with a change in zoning. GaIy Jones, club 1II!I\t)er, said II1I!IIly J;IE!qI1e bought in at the cun-ent price. ,CUrrent zoning SURJOrts that value. Paul Ng, club 1IIf!IIiJer, stated that the þI.'~ rezoning would induce loss of value in the market place. Unless all ~'-\"=Lt.ies are à:Ine at the same time, others will prOOably sell. 'Ibis results in discouraging open space. '1here being no other IÆIIi:Jers of the public wishing to speak, Acting C1air Fazekas closed the public hearing. Mr. Fazekas expressed a:mœrn regarding the land use diagram. He stated that at saœ point it seaœ it sOOuld be changed. MJl'ICN: Can. Mann 11DVed to find that the language oontained in the General Plan is an'bigucus and that there be no zoning public hearing at this time, but that this item should be part of the Geœral Plan hearingø. Any language anbiguities and the rœp shall be reviewed at that time. No zoning act:ia1 will be taken at this time. Can. Fazekas Passed (3-0) SI!JCCIID : VOlE: Mr. Cc7.im1 stated he will keep Mr. Lic:l1tJœn infoImed. Can. Mahoney and C1aizperson Maclœnzie re-entered ChaniJer. CbaiJ:person Maelœnzie anncunœd that Item No. 4 'oOUld be taken out of order . 4. Awlicati.a1 No( s) : Awliamt: PL'-\"=L ly OWner: Project Iocaticc: 3-V-9l I.ewin Kinq . I.ewin and Nancy King 10741 Santa :wci.a Road VARIAM:E to Secticn 8 of Ordinance No. 1449 regarding side yard setbacks to an existing single-family residence. PUHl]]C <XMfiSSICN MINu.IES ~11"T MBetinq of July 22, 1991 Page 6 Following staff report, Chairperson Mackenzie cpened the public hearing. As no one present wished to speak, he announced that the public hearing was closed. MJrICN: Can. Mahoney IIDved to 1.......,"cOO the granting of a Negative Declaration . Can. Fazekas Passed SEa:tID: VUŒ: MJrICN: Can. Mahoney IIDved to l.......",,,,,¡d a¡:proval with findings and oonditions as per Planning Calmission Resolution No. 4357. Can. Austin Passed SEa:tID: VUŒ: 5. AR'lication No(s): AR'licant: 81,120 City of CUpertino Sh,ff Presentation: fbJsing and Services Coordinator Norling reviewed her report and the prq¡osed ordinance with the Calmission. She stated that staff is rea:mnending one change to the h'L~ ordinance: on page 5-16, Itan A, the statement, '''lhese procedures shall not include height requirements or front yard setbacks" to be deleted. Following discussion, Chairperson Mackenzie opened the public hearing. Nancy Burnett, 729 Stendahl lane, speaking on behalf of CURB (CUpertinians urging Restraint on Building) , expressed cxmoern regarding residential areas. She asked hew tlùs 'oOUld affect the General Plan. She felt it 'oOUld weaken it. 'lhe City IIU.ISt acbpt an acceptable housing element as soon as possible. 'lhe City nust aài ßDre housing. By neglecting the housing requirement, the City ¡œy be wasting General Plan dollars. She gave her phone m.mtler to the exmnissioners and urged anyone with any questions to call her. Chairperson Mackenzie then closed the public hearing. 'lhe Calmission discussed whether or not to delete the sentence rea:mœncIed by staff. Chair Mac1œnzie then leq¡ened the public hearing. Me. Burnett asked if the Calmission was assuming that the fbJsing Element could be accepted without meeting the City's regional share. P.I.ANmI; <X:MfiSSICN MIH1lES 1lR}.1Ar H!et:ing of Jtùy 22, 1991 Page 7 Mr. Cowan stated the City I!D.ISt have adequate sites. '!his is being looked at with the General Plan process. We need a better definition regarding the ultimate capacity of housing. 'Ihe Chair, once again, closed the ~lic hearing. IDl'ICN: SFXnID: VOIE: IDl'ICN: SI!XXIID: VOIE: IDl'ICN: SI!XXIID : VOIE: Can. Austin IIDVed to rev.....llCI.d the granting of a Negative Declaration. Can. MaOOney Passed Can. Austin IIDVed to ~uve the çlication and rev.....llCI.d ~ of the ordinance as orig:i.nally sutrnitted without the deletion. Can. Fazekas Defeated (Can. Mann, Mahaney, Mackenzie dissenting) Can. Mann IIDVed to re.......I.llCI.d ~ of the çlication and the ordinance with the exception of the sentence an Page 5-16, A as requested by staff. . Can. MaOOney Passed (Can. Austin, Fazekas dissenting) 3. AR>lication No(S): AR>licant: &'-'1'= ly Owner: Project IDeation: 8-U-91 John P. Gachina I.anclscape !gnt. Rebert Ersepke and Rick S:iIraùni 10026/10038 Orange Avenue USE PERMIT to occupy bio single-family residences, an a 1:atporaty basis, to q,erate a landscape office business. Rt-~TT Presl:mrAT.; nn: Council. City Plarmer ~me11 reviewed the staff .L'¥J1.l with Al:Dlicant Press..,I.A1-itTI: John Gac:hina, çliœnt and resident at 21811 HentDsa Avenue, reviewed historical background for the a:mnission. He stated that he thought that the operation was an approvec:\ use. 'Ihe CXIIp!my oould not IIDve at this time, hIt wcu1.d like to remain at this location through the S"'SBa!. and then start seeking a new location. He has spent thousands of cbllars an ilrprovenenœ. 'Ihe Chair ~-d the ~lic hearing. PI.IIttiI!G a:HŒSSIœ MIlCIES 1l-J'.1"T MeetiDq of July 22, 1991 Page 8 RcI::b Craig, 10035 Orange Avenue, said he lived across the street fran the operation. When Mr. Gachina originally IIDIIed in, he said he wculd be there 6-8 WBeks¡ then, he revised the estimate to 1-2 years. 'lhere are 5-6 trucks parked at that location every night. Also, there is a storage roan. 'Ihe applicant did renovate the property on the right side. Mr. Craig expressed cx:mcern regarding storage and use of. fertilizers and other chemicals. Mr. Gachina has said that he does not store on site, but sanewhere else in the area. 'Ihe site is small and trucks with trailers block the streets. (bce a \>1eek, the dunprt:er is changed by the garbage cœpany and this also causes traffic cx:mgestion. !bIday through Friday, the office opens at 5:30 a.m.¡ trucks start up at 6:00 a.m. (b Saturday, it is very similar. (b SUnday, the office is open. Mr. Craig sul::mitted four photos of the site. He said that one of the neighbors had called and infonœd the City of the operation. Mr. Gachina needs to follOW' the rules . Lance Schendorf told CannÌ8sion he 1!ICuld like to explain how they had çptten into the situation. Mr. Schendorf said he had looked at a zoning map and ta1lœd to saneone at the desk in City Hall. He was told that this operation could exist without a use peIIllit only in HI. zone. He looked at the map of the area where it says P(. .-MI... . ). Assuming that meant that HI. uses were ði¥L'-¥'-iate in the area, he ~vC'eeded. Evidently, this was a mistake. 'Ihe cœpany is yc¡mg and trying to get through a bJsy I1~B""'1 in drought. It needs another six m:mths. 'Ihe applicants have tried ~ address the neighbors' ooncerns. Nancy Hertert, San JUan Read, urged preservation of the old alnDnd tree on the site. It was planted in 1876. Two arborists say it is in relatively !}XXI oondition cx:msidering its age and is probably the only one that old. She shl::Jwed slides of the tree. It was planted by Sanuel R. Williaœ, the first man to clear land in Cupertino. By clearing 100 acres, planting and harvesting grapes, he received 50 of those acres fran the owner. He then planted alnDnd trees arouOO the perimeter of the site. 'l1ú.s is the only remain.ing alnDnd tree. Mr. Craig said that the residents have no ill feelings regarding the office b.1siness ¡ it is the traffic and tool sharpening noise that are problEIIB. OI:he1:wise, Mr. Craig stated, he 1!IC1.Ùd have no problem to allOW' the use for six m:mths or a little longer. Chairperson Mackenzie closed the public hearing. During discussion, o::mnissioners made the following u.aIl'cuLs: can. Mahoney - eliminate the paving requirement and aài restriction pertaining to hours of use and garbage pickup. PIAlIIIlC aHíISSIŒ MnI11ES ~11AT Meeting of July 22, 1991 PIIge 9 Can. Austin - change hours of use to start at 7:00 a.m., otherwise allow it to cp!I'8te basically the same for six IIDIlths. Can. Fazekas - do not BURX>rt truck parking there; a landsœping OOsiness does not belc:mg there; office use wculd be all right with parking for users; paving does not matter. 'lbere sOOuld be no storage aIXi c:iunpJterB. Chair Mackenzie - use should start at 7:00 a.m. arxi tools should not be allowed to be sharpened there. 'lbere shculd office use only, with no overnight parking am no trucks; OOwever, it is not necessary to ~t. Mr. Cowan stated he oould understand IDw the ~ occurred. 'ttJe uses listed an the map pertain to the entire geceral area. Text ~ to be CXJI1SIllted to find the exact locations for each use. 'ttJe Carmission oould allow the use to cxmtinue for six m::nths with mitigation measures being taken regarding the c:iunpJterB, early JIDming starting, arxi trucks . Mr. Gachina said that five trucks are IIODIBlly there, rut they all cculd be at the site in early 11DrI1ing when ~ is in the office. He has Il1!Ide sane arrangements so sane of the trucks are out of the way. Can. Mann arxi Austin stated that four trucks wculd be ac::oeptab1e to thEm; the other amnissioners stated there should be no trucks an the site. SI!XXtID: VOlE: Can. Austin nDWd to ~u,¡e the ~liœtia1 arxi leave the use as is allowing the overnight parking of up to four trucks with trailers attached with 00urs to cxmfOI1ll to the general cx:mnercial ordinance; J................Jd a¡:.proval of a six-ilDllth use per planning Carmissicn Resoluticn No. 4359, with postinq of the boIxI. as stated in Caxiitia1 No.2; delete the requiraœnt for paved parking; allow use of a dimpIter; no storage of chemicals, arxi to allow the shed to remain for the six-ilDllth period. Findings are Il1!Ide that this is the extraœ edge of Uoall'oc::rd.al use. Can. MLWmey Passed (3-2) with Can. Mann arxi Fazekas dissenting MJrICN: Rl!X:ESS: 9:00-9:15 P.M. 6. ~licaticn No(S): ~liœnt: Prq)erty owner: Project IDœ.tia1: l-V-91 arxi 3-EXC-91 Ilsang :u,e Ilsang :u,e 10091 Hillcrest Road PIMI!IIIC CXHŒSSICJi MDIJTES Ih'oJI.hlr Meeting of July 22, 1991 Page 10 gt-.q-ff Presenta+-inn,: a:mnission . City Planner \\brdell reviewed the report with the ADDlicant Presentation: James lee, architect, presented historical info:cnation to the a:mnission. Chair Maclœnzie opened the public hearing. John \"bJlfolk, Hillcrest Road, stated he was not in support of the requested variance and exception and did support staff recx:mnendation. He felt that the lot CDUld be developed without the variances. 'l11e I:W.lding in back of the structure is not being used for storage. People are living in it with a kitchen and a bat.hrcan. Chair Maclœnzie closed the public hearing. Ms. \\brdell stated that Bob Brushwiler, resident, 10143 Hillcrest Road, has suJ::rnitted a letter qp:>sing the variance. Can. Marm, Mahoney, and Fazekas stated that this awlication 00es not meet the necessary =iteria for approving a variance. Mr. Fazekas requested that the City investigate the possible use of the secxmd I:W.lding as an apartment. Ms. Austin also requested that use be investigated. She ~=sed cxmoern regarding the dis=epancy in parcel width, as _11 as the height and II'ðSS of the proposed dwelling. She stated there is no reason for a variance. SEO:'tID : VOŒ: Can. Fazekas IIDVed to adept Planning Camlission Resolution No. 4360, rcu..llll,,,,,Jding denial of the variance and to deny AF;. . ication 3-EXC-91 as per staff report. Can. Austin Passed M:lI'ICJi: 7. Jlt:plication No(S): Jlt:plicant: Property OWner: Project IDeation: 26-U-90 Nelson Chao Nelson Chao North s.ide of Peni.nsul.a Avenue northerly of and adjacent to Stevens creek Boulevard ~"'Tf PresentaHnn: City Planner \\brdell said that it is necessary for the neighbors to reach ðýl:ea'letlt regarding parking. All of their use peDllits are exmtingent on that. PLAMmG aHaSSlœ MII«1.IES RstJ11Ar IØ!t.ÌD] of July 22, 1991 PBge 11 ADDliœnt Pì._!II,t..ðt-inT1: Frank Oldham, architect, San Jose, said the applicant has resolved part of the problem; however, Dr. Brown has stated he is not willing to enact the condition of his use penni.t regarding the parking and circulation inprovanents. Mr. Oldham stated he feels it is up to the Planning Camlission to enforce the requirBœnt. Mr. Chao bought his property eight IIDIlths aq:J. He wculd like to be able to use his building; he wculd like the water tmned an and ~ for four people to caxiuct business. Ms. \'brdell stated that the building has been physically changed so a use peIIDit is needeñ. No change in parking has been prcposed by the applicant. Can. Mann stated she agrees with the staff rb.u.IIUC..dation. '!hen, if the neighbors are not willing to inplement the condition, the City should µ¡rsue it. Mr. Oldham stated that earlier an the agen: a, the Camlission had given sanecne a six-llDllth~. He suggested the amnission cb the same for Mr. Chao and one eøployee and visitors while the City pursues the neighbors . Michael Pericus, owner of the M:mta vista Inn, said that ~tly, Dr. Brown and others did not receive notice about this bearing. He stated he did not kncJw what ~ the City ~ £ran the other owners. His street cannot be eliminated; he J:"""'"",.....1ded that the amnission leave things as they are. He stated this WðS the first time he had heard of that obligation. Chair Mackenzie closed the pmlic bearing. Discussion followed regarding setting a pmlic bearing for abancDment. '!he bearing oould be cxn:Iucted in SepteIItJer. In the meantime, the amnission CXJUl.d cxmtinue cxmsideration of this application. Deplty Director of Public tbrks \tú.tten said Dr. Brown is not cxmcerned regarding this matter. 1ÞoIever, Mr. Chao and the M:mta vista Inn wculd have a circulation problem. Mr. Cowan suggested that the he¡D:ing be oontinued to AugUst 12 so staff can try to get the three owners together. eansicleration for setting a pmlic hearing CDUl.d be placed an the agen: a of the AugUst 19 City Council meeting . P.LAMmI; aHfiSSICN M:INUŒS ~lbr Meeting of July 22, 1991 P8ge 12 Mr. Whitten stated that a public hearing pertaining to road abanoou"....lt muld then be set by the Council for October 7. MJTICN: Can. Fazekas IIDVed to oontinue CDI1Sideration of this awlication to the meeting of August 12 at which time a cmpleted awlication with re<:ulll.....dations and mmber of parking places needed will be presented. SECX:tID: Can. Mahoney VOIE: Passed AnDHM!Bl': At 10:00 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully subnitted, R~4~ Do Corne . ReCDrcting Secretary ~ by the Planning Camlission at the Regular Meeting of August 12, 1991 Attest: 1".12".;£ /.J~.~ . r . ~ / Dorotliy Cornelius, ty Clerk